非饱和土边坡临界破坏面的比较研究
非饱和土边坡临界破坏面的比较研究
1051/matecconf/202439401005
ICCEE2023
Abstract. Landslides are rapid downslope movements triggered by factors such as rainfall, earthquakes, or
human activity, where factors like relative permeability, air flow, and variations in hydraulic conductivity
affect the mechanisms behind rainfall infiltration and landslide occurrence. This study investigates these
phenomena using the finite difference method (FDM) and finite element method (FEM) in FLAC and
PLAXIS software. These methods account for the coexistence of water and air, including the Two-phase
flow option, in evaluating unsaturated slope stability and identifying critical failure surfaces. The efficiency
of these approaches is gauged by varying soil parameters and exploring the impact of different values of
suction and hydraulic conductivity, as well as soil-water characteristics, on the safety factor. It was observed
that there are disparities between both software packages at high suction values, which impact the safety
factor. FLAC is noted for its conservative approach and superiority in representing unfavourable conditions.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
MATEC Web of Conferences 394, 01005 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439401005
ICCEE2023
Pc P0 S e m 1
(FDM) locates the critical failure surface based on a
1
(3)
calculation of failure shear strain zones which have been
shown to coincide with rupture surfaces in experimental
tests. The method of calculation of FoS in PLAXIS 2D w g
P0 (4)
and FLAC 2D is the shear strength reduction method.
When analysing unsaturated slopes in FLAC, Where (Se) is effective saturation; m and P0 are the
suction is typically incorporated through constitutive shape parameters and P0 is the reference capillary
models such as the Soil Water Characteristic Curve pressure.
(SWCC) and the unsaturated soil shear strength Equation (5) defines the relationship between the
parameters. The impact of suction on the safety factor of mobility coefficient utilized in FLAC, which
unsaturated slopes in FLAC is influenced by the explicit characterizes permeability, and the hydraulic
representation of soil-water-air interactions, allowing conductivity commonly employed in expressing Darcy's
for a detailed analysis of moisture-induced changes in law in terms of head.
soil behaviour and its effect on slope stability. On the Ks
other hand, PLAXIS utilizes a finite element method K (5)
( g w )
(FEM) for numerical analysis, focusing on the
discretization of the soil domain into finite elements.
PLAXIS offers various constitutive models to account 2.3 Slope Parameters
for unsaturated soil behaviour, including the Van
Genuchten model for the soil-water retention curve. In The primary aim of this comparative study is to assess
PLAXIS, suction influences the safety factor of soil infiltration processes using FLAC and PLAXIS
unsaturated slopes by affecting soil shear strength software while exploring how the hydrological and
parameters and pore-water pressure distributions. mechanical properties of soils impact the slope stability
To numerically model the initiation of slope failures and length of the arc of failure. The slope angle of
caused by rainfall under unsaturated conditions, it is approximately 34 degrees was selected, as shown (see
necessary to develop a hydromechanically coupled Fig. 1). which was considered for the analysis.
transient analysis in a systematic way. In the case of
unsaturated soil, the pore volume is partially filled with
water, while the remaining portion is occupied by air.
Consequently, the key disparity between the shear
strength of saturated and unsaturated soils lies in the
definition of effective normal stress.
A practical Equation (1) provided by Bishop is used
in PLAXIS and FLAC to define the shear strength of
unsaturated soil. This equation incorporates parameters
like the frictional resistance angle ( ), pore air pressure
(Pa), and pore water pressure (Pw), and it is expressed
as:
Fig .1. Slope geometry and boundary conditions adopted in
max ( Pa ) tan ( Pa Pw ) tan c this study.
the safety factor is obtained as: Field and laboratory tests, direct shear tests, and
soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC), were conducted
max to obtain the necessary material properties of the soil.
Fs (2)
n These tests provide crucial data for accurately
simulating the behaviour of the slope and analysing the
Where (τn) is the reduced shear strength that is just large infiltration process. When constructing the model, the
enough to maintain equilibrium. layer inputs were tailored to the specific properties of
the soil slope being simulated. A detailed description of
2.2 Unsaturated flow these inputs can be found in the provided (see Fig. 2 and
Table.1).
Matric suction is described as the difference between
pore air pressure and pore-water pressure. The
connection between soil water content and pore-water
pressure is represented as the soil-water characteristic
curve (SWCC), which plots volumetric moisture content
against matric suction.
2
MATEC Web of Conferences 394, 01005 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439401005
ICCEE2023
3
MATEC Web of Conferences 394, 01005 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439401005
ICCEE2023
points during the numerical integration process in finite 3.3 Impact of rainfall intensity on the slip
element seepage analysis. surface length
In this study, the impact of rainfall intensity on the slip
3.2 Safety factor comparison surface was carefully examined, with a particular focus
on the length of the failure arc (La) as a quantitative
To inspect the outputs from PLAXIS and FLAC the
variable. To accurately assess this, precise
models were chosen up to their properties and exposed
measurements were obtained by creating circles using
to various rainfall intensities as shown in Tables 2 which
AutoCAD software to identify entry and exit points
summarizes the distinction between the FOS acquired
within the slope area, allowing for a comprehensive
from both programs and compares these results using
analysis of the failure arc.
the following formula:
FOS(FLAC) − FOS(PLAXIS)
𝐷𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 = × 100
FOS(FLAC) + FOS(PLAXIS)
2
Table 2. The difference of FOS between FLAC and
PLAXIS.
Rain FLAC PLAXIS Difference
Soil
Intensity FOS FOS %
Type
(mm/h)
0 1.64 1.662 -1.33
2.5 1.611 1.637 -1.6
1 5 1.576 1.534 -2.7
7.5 1.533 1.274 18.45
10 1.463 1.175 21.8
0 2.225 3.25 -37.44 Fig .4. Failure arc creation in AutoCAD
2.5 2.209 3.196 -36.52
2 5 2.186 3.973 -30.5 Inclusion of Figures (5) in this study offer a
7.5 2.158 2.782 -25.26 comprehensive visual depiction of the research findings.
10 2.127 2.415 -12.68 These figures elucidate the relationship between
0 1.762 1.926 -8.89 hydrological characteristics and rainfall intensity,
2.5 1.74 1.901 -8.84 shedding light on their collective impact on the variation
3 5 1.725 1.862 -7.63 in the length of the failure arc within the unsaturated
7.5 1.706 1.761 -3.17 slope systems under investigation. Through meticulous
10 1.678 1.663 0.89 analysis, it becomes evident that heightened rainfall
intensity correlates directly with a discernible reduction
The influence of rainfall intensity and hydrologic in the length of the surface failure arc.
characteristics on the safety factor is visually Moreover, an observation arises from the
represented in the table. Notably, there is a significant comparative analysis of the results obtained from FLAC
difference in FOS values between the FLAC and and PLAXIS. Despite FLAC exhibiting lower safety
PLAXIS programs in certain cases. For the first type of factor values, it is intriguing to note that the length of
soil, under steady-state conditions and with rainfall the failure surface in FLAC surpasses that in PLAXIS.
intensity less than 5 mm, there was no difference. This observation unveils a compelling insight into the
However, it is important to note that the greater the nuanced interplay between numerical modelling
initial suction, the larger the difference in the safety methodologies and the resulting surface failure
factor. As rainfall rate increased, the disparity also characteristics.
increased. It is noticeable that FOS values obtained from
FLAC are lower in 80% of the scenarios, and the rate of
decrease in FOS from 0 to 10 mm/h in PLAXIS is
greater than in FLAC.
4
MATEC Web of Conferences 394, 01005 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439401005
ICCEE2023
It suggests that the choice of software platform can exert 5. H-E. Chen, T-L, Tsai, J-C, Yang, Threshold of
a discernible impact on the morphology of failure Slope Instability Induced by Rainfall and Lateral
surfaces within unsaturated slope systems. Such Flow. Water. 9, 722 (2017)
observations prompt a deeper exploration into the https://doi.org/10.3390/w9090722
underlying mechanisms driving these variations, 6. D.G. Fredlund, N.R. Morgenstern, R.A. Widger,
necessitating further investigation and analysis to The shear strength of unsaturated soils. Canadian
elucidate the factors influencing the discrepancy Geotechnical Journal. 15, 313–321 (1978)
between FLAC and PLAXIS results in terms of failure
https://doi.org/10.1139/t78-029
surface length. This insight underscores the importance
of meticulous consideration when selecting a numerical 7. S.L. Barbour, D.G. Fredlund, M.D. Fredlund, A.
modelling approach, as it can profoundly shape the Xing, The relationship of the unsaturated soil shear
outcomes and interpretations derived from slope strength to the soil-water characteristic curve.
stability analyses. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 33, 440–448
(1995)
https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-065
4 Conclusions
8. S.G. Goh, E.C. Leong, H.Rahardjo, Shear Strength
This comparative review of popular computer programs Equations for Unsaturated Soil under Drying and
for rainfall-induced seepage unsaturated slope problems Wetting. Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-
highlights the direct relationship between hydrological environmental Engineering. 136, 594-606 (2010)
characteristics, rainfall intensities, and safety factors. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-
Notably, in fully coupled numerical models using FLAC 5606.0000261
and PLAXIS 2D, hydraulic conductivity (ks) emerges as 9. Itasca Manual. Fluid–Mechanical Interaction,
the primary controlling parameter for the FLAC 8.0, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc (2011)
hydromechanical response and failure time of
unsaturated slopes subjected to rainfall infiltration. 10. S.U. Cho, S.Kang, S.T. Lee, Slope stability
Despite FLAC's inherent complexities, it emerges analysis of unsaturated soil slopes based on the
as the more conservative software for slope stability site-specific characteristics: a case study of
studies compared to PLAXIS, because usually gave out hwangryeong mountain, Busan, Korea.
the lowest value for factor of safety in comparison. Sustainability. 12(7), 2839 (2020)
Furthermore, an increase in rainfall intensity results in a https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072839
reduced length of the failure arc (La) and factor of safety 11. K. Terzaghi, Mechanism of Landslides, The
(FOS), with FLAC showing the longest failure length Geological Society of America. Berkey volume,
compared to PLAXIS. This characteristic makes FLAC 83–123 (1950)
a suitable choice for engineers, as it represents the most
12. M.T. Van Genuchten, A closed-form equation for
unfavorable conditions. Further studies and
predicting the hydraulic conductivity of
modification to the DLL file in the PLAXIS program are
unsaturated soils. soil science society of America
needed to simulate the infiltration process.
journal. 44, 892–898 (1980)
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.0361599500440
References 0050002x