Lees_greatest_hits_diff_geom_list
Lees_greatest_hits_diff_geom_list
LIST OF PAPERS
the eigenvalues of the Laplacian on a compact Riemannian manifold with the lengths of its
closed geodesics.
• S. Marvizi and R. B. Melrose, Spectral invariants of convex planar regions, J. Differential
Geom. 17 (1982) 475–502. Uses wave asymptotics to find spectral invariants of convex
domains in the plane.
8. Minimal submanifolds
• H. Federer and W. Fleming, Normal and integral currents, Ann. of Math. 72 (1960) 458–
520. Introduces the concept of integral currents (generalized submanifolds), the main tool
of geometric measure theory which is used to study minimal submanifolds.
• J. Sacks and K. Uhlenbeck, The existence of minimal immersions of 2-spheres, Ann. of
Math. 113 (1981) 1–24. Introduces the technique of rescaling to handle the “bubbling”
phenomena that are ubiquitous in geometric nonlinear PDE’s.
• R. Harvey and H. B. Lawson, Calibrated Geometries, Acta Math. 148 (1982) 47–157. This
paper introduced an important and creative new point of view, that of “calibrations”, into
the subject of minimal submanifolds.
• E. Bombieri, E. De Giorgi, and E. Giusti, Minimal cones and the Bernstein problem, Invent.
Math. 7 (1969) 243–268. Constructed counterexamples of nontrivial global minimal graphs
in R9 .
to the conformal case. He described his approach to the problem, and, with a very long
and difficult argument, proved that it works for some invariants in some dimensions.
• C. Fefferman and C. R. Graham, Conformal invariants, in “Élie Cartan et les Mathé-
matiques d’Aujourd’hui”, Astérisque, 1985, pp. 95–116. Here Fefferman’s framework for
constructing invariants is extended to the conformal case.
• T. N. Bailey, M. G. Eastwood, and C. R. Graham, Invariant theory for conformal and
CR geometry, Ann. of Math. (2) 139 (1994) 491–552. The problem of describing scalar
conformal invariants is completely solved in odd dimensions.
22. CR manifolds
• S. S. Chern and J. K. Moser, Real Hypersurfaces in complex manifolds, Acta Math. 133
(1974) 219–271. Solved of the “equivalence problem” for CR manifolds (abstract models
of real hypersurfaces in Cn ), based on the construction of CR invariants in two different
8
ways: by putting the power series of a real hypersurface in a “normal form” (Moser); and
by constructing a canonical connection on a certain fiber bundle over the CR manifold
(Chern).
• S. M. Webster, Pseudohermitian structures on a real hypersurface, J. Differential Geometry
13 (1978) 25–41. Carries out the analogue of the Chern connection for a CR manifold
endowed with a specific choice of Levi form (a “pseudohermitian structure”).
• N. Tanaka, “A Differential-Geometric Study on Strongly Pseudoconvex Manifolds”, Kinoku-
niya Company Ltd., Tokyo, 1975. An alternative construction of the canonical connection
associated with a pseudohermitian structure, carried out more or less simultaneously with
and independently of Webster’s.
for turning classical dynamical systems into quantum systems, now called “geometric quan-
tization”.
• B. Kostant, Graded manifolds, graded lie theory, and prequantization, in “Differential Geo-
metrical methods in Mathematical Physics”, Springer Lecture Notes in Math. #570, 1977,
pp. 177–306. Introduced “supermanifolds,” now studied by both mathematicians and physi-
cists.
• R. S. Hamilton, The inverse function theorem of Nash and Moser, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.
7 (1982) 65–222. A very general treatment of the celebrated Nash-Moser theorem, which
extends the inverse function theorem to spaces of C ∞ functions.
• M. Gromov and R. Schoen, Harmonic maps into singular spaces and p-adic superrigidity
for lattices in groups of rank one, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. No. 76 (1992),
165-246.
• M. Gromov, Filling Riemannian manifolds, J. Differential Geom. 18 (1983) 1–147. In this
seminal paper, Gromov proves (among many other things) that any compact subdomain of
Euclidean space is boundary rigid by showing that the “filling volume” of the boundary is
greater than or equal to the volume of the domain. The rigidity follows by showing that
equality implies flatness. Like most of Gromov’s papers this is hard to read.
• C. Croke, Rigidity and the distance between boundary points, J. Differential Geom. 33 (1991)
445–464. A simplification of Gromov’s proof of boundary rigidity.
• Dmitri Burago and Sergei Ivanov, Riemannian tori without conjugate points are flat, Geom.
Funct. Anal., 4 (1994) 259–269. A proof of Hopf’s conjecture that any metric without
conjugate points on the n-torus must be flat.