unit 3
unit 3
CHEMICAL TO ELECTRICAL
ENERGY
Dr.A.Manivannan
Associate Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Anna University, Chennai – 600 025
Content
Fuel Cell :
Basics – working, advantages and drawbacks
– types
–comparative analysis
– thermodynamics and kinetics of fuel cell process
– performance of fuel cell
– applications
History
• The principle of the fuel cell was discovered by German scientist C. F. Schönbein in 1838.
• Based on this work, the first fuel cell was demonstrated by Welsh scientist Sir W.R. Grove in
1839
• In 1939, British engineer F.T. Bacon successfully developed a 5 kW stationary fuel cell.
• In 1955, W.T. Grubb, a chemist working for the General Electric (GE) Company (USA), further
modified the original fuel cell design by using a sulphonated polystyrene ion-exchange
membrane as the electrolyte.
• Three years later another GE chemist, L. Niedrach, devised a way of depositing platinum onto
the membrane, which served as catalyst for the necessary hydrogen oxidation and oxygen
reduction reactions.
• This was the first commercial use of a fuel cell. In 1959, a team led by H. Ihrig built a 15 kW
fuel cell tractor for Allis-Chalmers, which was demonstrated across the U.S. at state fairs.
• This system used potassium hydroxide as the electrolyte and compressed hydrogen and
oxygen as the reactants.
• In the 1960s, Pratt and Whitney licensed Bacon's U.S. patents for use in the U.S. space
program to supply electricity and drinking water (hydrogen and oxygen being readily available
from the spacecraft tanks).
• International Fuel Cells (IFC, later UTC Power) developed a 1.5 kW alkaline fuel cell (AFC) for
use in the Apollo space missions. The fuel cell provided electrical power as well as drinking
water for the astronauts for the duration of their mission.
• IFC subsequently developed a 12 kW AFC, used to provide onboard power on all space
shuttle flights.
FUEL CELL
Fuel Cell
O2 H2O
Heat
5
Basic Working Principle of Fuel Cell
• In its basic form a fuel cell operates as follows: hydrogen
reacts with oxygen in the presence of an electrolyte and
produces water, while at the same time an electrochemical
potential is developed, which causes the flow of an electric
current in the external circuit (load)
2 H2 → 4 H+ + 4e-
Basic Operation Principle of Fuel Cells
7
• At the anode, ions and free electrons are produced. Ions
move towards the cathode through the electrolyte.
• This is why they are characterised as low temperature fuel cells. The
operating pressure in some cases is a few atmospheres, but most
often it has been the atmospheric pressure.
14
• The electrolyte in this fuel cell is concentrated (85 wt percent)
KOH in fuel cells operated at high temperature (~250 °C), or
less concentrated (35 to 50 wt percent) KOH for lower
temperature (<120 °C) operation
• Since it tends to evaporate the water product, the hydrogen have to be done to
circulate in order to extract the evaporated water solution with a condenser.
• The bigger problem inside this design is the chemical reaction between the
potassium hydroxide (KOH) and the carbon dioxide (CO2) that is present in the air.
• This reaction is unfavorable because the efficiency of the fuel cell depends upon the
purity of the potassium hydroxide solution.
• In order to solve this problem a carbon dioxide scrubber (very expensive) is used to
maintain the solution as pure as possible. This type of design is the one that was
used inside the Apollo space shuttle , where the cost was not a problem .
Static electrolyte AFC’S
• In this design, the potassium solution is held inside
asbestos with a matrix structure which prevents the
electrolyte to circulate.
• This type of AFC, which is not suitable for large power generators,
have high problems regarding the fuel crossover but they can be
ignored since the catalyst used is not platinum (thus greatly reducing
the costs for the substitution of the catalyst)
• Another big problem is that the most suitable fuel for this cell is the
hydrazine (due to the capacity to dissociate into hydrogen and
nitrogen) which is a toxic, carcinogen and explosive fuel
Advantages & Disadvantages
• Advantages
– excellent performance on hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2)
compared to other candidate fuel cells due to its active O2
electrode kinetics and its flexibility to use a wide range of
electro-catalysts
– wide operating temperature range;
– high simplicity of the cell structure;
– fast start up;
– Competitive costs for the cell construction (due to the
simplicity of the materials involved);
– Capacity to reach an electrical efficiency of 65% (which is
really high for cold fuel cells);
– a life cycle time between 10,000 and 15,000 hours due to
the good compatibility of the materials in the cell
(however life cycles of 40,000 hours are required in order
to a full commercialization of a fuel cell technology).
– As a result if compared with PEM fuel cells the AFCs are
cheaper and more efficient.
• Disadvantages
– The sensitivity of the electrolyte to CO2 requires the use
of highly pure H2 as a fuel. As a consequence, the use of a
reformer would require a highly effective CO and CO2
removal system.
– In addition, if ambient air is used as the oxidant, the CO2
in the air must be removed. While this is technically not
challenging, it has a significant impact on the size and
cost of the system.
Applications
• AFCs are still the main technology used inside the space
environment as well as inside many applications regarding
submarines, but they are not considered a suitable
technology for static or mobile applications on earth.
• Typically, carbon electrodes with platinum electro-catalyst are used for both
anode and cathode, and with either carbon or metal interconnects.
• The electrodes and the electrolyte layer are then joined together, by
hot pressing process, in order to create a “membrane electrode
assembly” (MEA)
PEMFC structure
PEMFC Cell Stack
The Membrane
• Although many different types of membranes are used, by far that
most common is Nafion (DuPont), a sulphonated polymer with a
PFTE (Poly Tetra Fluoro Ethylene)backbone.
– Good proton (H+ ) conductor if well hydrated, but doesn’t allow the
conduction of electrons which are constricted to follow an external
path thus generating an electrical current;
– does not allow the intermixing of the hydrogen and oxygen thus
maintaining the two gas separated;
• In both the anode and cathode, the catalyst layer is the location of the half-
cell reaction in a PEM fuel cell. The catalyst layer is either applied to the
membrane or to the gas diffusion layer.
• The differences between DMFC and PEMFC resides in the fuel used, which in this
case is constituted by liquid methanol dissolved in water.
• The main advantage of DMFC resides in the fuel used, since methanol is a cheap
and easy to produce fuel which can be directly injected and used inside the cell
itself thus allowing a simple cell structure and consequently lower weights.
DMFC Structure
• The core of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell is the polymer
electrolyte ion exchange membrane. As the PEMFC the
state of the art in membranes is Nafion. This polymer
has sites with strong ionic properties acting as proton
exchange sites
• When the cell is activated a liquid flux of methanol is injected into the anode
from where it is diffused inside the diffusion layer.
• The methanol reaches the catalytic layer where it is oxidized into carbon
dioxide, protons and electrons.
• At this point the protons diffuse trough the Nafion membrane and electrons
trough the catalytic layer but, while the electrons are collected by the
cathode thus generating an electrical current, the protons that diffuses
through the membrane react at the cathode with oxygen to produce water
Advantages
• These cells is that they work on methanol which is much
more easy to store and to produce than hydrogen,
without the hazard of explosions as in the case of the
hydrogen
• Still, due to the low efficiency, the power density that the
DMFC are able to provide, which is around 200-400 mW/cm , 2
60
• The basic cell structure is made of a ceramic matrix
impregnated with a solution of phosphoric acid which is
surrounded by a couple of porous electrodes used to
collect the ions and to diffuse the gasses
• In addition, the waste heat from PAFC can be readily used in most
commercial and industrial cogeneration applications, and would technically
allow the use of a bottoming cycle.
Disadvantages
• Cathode-side oxygen reduction is slower than in AFC,
and requires the use of a Platinum catalyst.
• The eutectic mixture consists of 68% Li2CO3 and 32% K2CO3, which at
the operating temperature of 600-700oC is at liquid phase.
• The high temperature available heat can be used either for thermal
processes (cogeneration) or in a bottoming cycle for additional
power production. Experimental units have been constructed, but
the MCFC technology is still at the development phase.
78
• The focus of MCFC development has been larger
stationary and marine applications
– both CO and certain hydrocarbons are fuels for the MCFC, as they are
converted to hydrogen within the stack (on special reformer plates)
simplifying the BoP and improving system efficiency to the high forties to
low fifties
• Two types of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells actually exists: the oxygen
ion conducting type and the hydrogen ion conducting type
• The solid oxide fuel cell is an all-solid-state power
system, which uses yttria-stabilised zirconia (Y2O3-
ZrO2), a ceramic material, as the electrolyte layer.
• The system provides high quality waste heat, which is ideal for
cogeneration or for additional power production by a bottoming
cycle. It is envisaged that units at the order of tens of megawatts
can be combined with a gas turbine – steam turbine combined
cycle: hot gases exiting the cell stack will drive a gas turbine.
• After the exit from the gas turbine they will pass through an
exhaust gas boiler producing steam for thermal processes or for
additional power production by a steam turbine.
90
Advantages
• The SOFC is the fuel cell with the longest continuous development period,
starting in the late 1950s, several years before the AFC. Because the
electrolyte is solid, the cell can be cast into various shapes, such as tubular,
planar, or monolithic. The solid ceramic construction of the unit cell
alleviates any corrosion problems in the cell.
• The kinetics of the cell are relatively fast, and CO is a directly useable fuel as
it is in the MCFC. There is no requirement for CO2 at the cathode as with the
MCFC.
• The materials used in SOFC are modest in cost. Thin-
electrolyte planar SOFC unit cells have been demonstrated to
be cable of power densities close to those achieved with
PEFC.
Distributed
Light Traction Portable Power
Power
Vehicles (Cars) Generators
Generators
Heavy Traction
Combined Heat Consumer
Vehicles (Buses,
and Power Electronics
Trucks)
STATIONARY FUEL-
CELL POWER
SYSTEMS
Fuel Cell Power Plant Major Processes
Fuel cell used in
Mobility Applications
Fuel cell used in Portable Applications
[ELECTRONICS]
Fuel cell used in
Portable Applications
[MILITARY]
Typical Gadgets used by a
Armed person in Mission
Fuel Cell used in Space Applications
H2 Electricity
Fuel Cell
O2 H2O
Fuel Cell
Heat
1
= ℎ𝑓 − ℎ𝑓 + ℎ𝑓
𝐻2 𝑂(𝑙) 𝐻2 (𝑔) 2 𝑂2 (𝑔)
H2 1 Τ
+ 2 O2 g → H O 𝐥 +
286 kJ/mole
( g) ( ) 2 ()
1 Τ
H2 + 2 O2 g → H O 𝐠 + 242 kJ/mole
( g) ( ) 2 ( )
The overall reaction in the direct methanol fuel cell is
CH3OH(l) + 3/2 O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2H2O(l)
3
= 2 ℎ𝑓 + ℎ𝑓 − ℎ𝑓 + ℎ𝑓
𝐻2 𝑂(𝑙) 𝐶𝑂2 (𝑔) CH3OH l
()
2 𝑂2 (𝑔)
kgH 2 kgH 2
mH 2 ,Consumed (1429 kA) X 0.037605 53.73
hr kA hr
• Note that without the simplifying assumption that the fuel cells
were arranged in parallel, the same hydrogen mass flow could have
been calculated with a few extra steps.
• For example, if the fuel cell stack was composed of 500 cells in
series, then the stack voltage would have been 350 volts [(500
cells)(0.7 V/cell)],
• The stack current would have been 2.858 kA/cell [1429 kA / 500
cells]. Because this stack current passes through 500 cells arranged
in series, the hydrogen consumption is calculated as
kA kgH 2 kgH 2
mH 2 ,Consumed 2.858 X 0.037605 X 500 Cells 53.73
Cell hr kA hr
(b) The utilization of fuel in a fuel cell is defined as
• Leonardo Giorgi, and Fabio Leccese, “Fuel Cells: Technologies and Applications”,
The Open Fuel Cells Journal, 2013, 6, 1-20.