Crystallization Process--Encylopedia of Science
Crystallization Process--Encylopedia of Science
Crystallization Processes
Ronald W. Rousseau
Georgia Institute of Technology
91
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
92 Crystallization Processes
in recent years to improve the understanding of crystal- product that meets purity specifications. For example, in
lization, and a large portion of the research on the topic the manufacture of the amino acid L-isoleucine, the prod-
has dealt with mechanisms of nucleation and growth. Es- uct is first recovered in acid form, redissolved, neutralized,
pecially important has been elucidation of the effects of and then recrystallized in order to exclude the impurity
process variables on the rates at which these phenomena L-leucine and other amino acids from the product.
occur. Additionally, extensive progress has been achieved A simple change in physical properties also can be
in modeling both steady-state and dynamic behavior of achieved by crystallization. In the process of making soda
crystallization systems of industrial importance. The pri- ash, referred to earlier, the sodium bicarbonate crystals are
mary elements of the discussion that follows are the princi- subjected to heat that causes the release of carbon dioxide
ples that influence yield, morphology, and size distribution and produces low-density sodium carbonate crystals. The
of crystalline products. density of these crystals is incompatible with their use in
glass manufacture, but a more acceptable crystal can be
obtained by contacting the sodium carbonate crystals with
I. OBJECTIVES OF CRYSTALLIZATION water to form crystalline sodium carbonate monohydrate.
PROCESSES Drying the resulting crystals removes the water of hydra-
tion and produces a dense product that is acceptable for
Several examples of objectives that may be satisfied in glass manufacture.
crystallization processes are given in the following dis- Separation of a chemical species from a mixture of sim-
cussion. Soda ash (sodium carbonate) is recovered from ilar compounds can be achieved by crystallization. The
brine by contacting the brine with carbon dioxide that re- mode of crystallization may fall in the realm of what
acts with sodium carbonate to form sodium bicarbonate. is known as melt crystallization. In such processes, the
Sodium bicarbonate, which has a lower solubility than mother liquor largely is comprised of the melt of the crys-
sodium carbonate, crystallizes as it is formed. The pri- tallizing species, and, subsequent to its crystallization,
mary objective of the crystallizers used in this process crystals formed from the mother liquor are remelted to
is separation of a high percentage of sodium bicarbonate produce the product from the crystallizer. Para( p)-xylene
from the brine in a form that facilitates segregation of the can be crystallized from a mixture that includes ortho
crystals from the mother liquor. The economics of crystal and meta isomers in a vertical column that causes crys-
separation from the mother liquor are affected primarily tals and mother liquor to move countercurrently. Heat is
by the variables that control the flow of liquid through the added at the bottom of the column to melt the p-xylene
cake of crystals formed on a filter or in a centrifuge. For crystals; a portion of the melt is removed from the crys-
example, the flow rate of liquid through a filter cake de- tallizer as product and the remainder flows up the col-
pends on the available pressure drop across a filter, liquid umn to contact the downward-flowing crystals. Effluent
viscosity, and the size distribution of crystals collected on mother liquor, consisting almost entirely of the ortho and
the filter. With a fixed available pressure drop and defined meta isomers of xylene, is removed from the top of the
liquid properties, the crystal size distribution controls filter column.
throughput and, concomitantly, the production rate from Production of a consumer product in a form suitable
the process. for use and acceptable to the consumer also may be an ob-
Crystallization can be used to remove solvent from a jective of a crystallization process. For example, sucrose
liquid solution. For example, concentration of fruit juice (sugar) can be crystallized in various forms. However, dif-
requires the separation of solvent (water) from the natural ferent cultures are accustomed to using sugar that has a
juice. The common procedure is evaporation, but the de- particular appearance and, unless the commodity has that
rived juices may lose flavor components or undergo ther- appearance, the consumer may consider the sugar to be
mal degradation during the evaporative process. In freeze unacceptable.
concentration, the solvent is crystallized (frozen) in rela- In all these processes, there are commmon needs: to
tively pure form to leave behind a solution with a higher form crystals, to cause them to grow, and to separate the
solute concentration than the original mixture. Significant crystals from the residual liquid. While conceptually sim-
advantages in product taste have been observed in the ap- ple, the operation of a process that utilizes crystallization
plication of this process to concentrations of various types can be very complex. The reasons for such complexity in-
of fruit juice. volve the interaction of the common needs and process re-
The elimination of small amounts of an impurity from a quirements on product yield, purity, and, uniquely, crystal
product species may be an objective of crystallization. In morphology and size distribution. In the following discus-
such instances, a multistep crystallization–redissolution– sion, the interactions will be discussed and general princi-
recrystallization process may be required to produce a ples affecting crystallizer operation will be outlined. More
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
Crystallization Processes 93
extensive discussion of the subject matter can be found in conditions and the limitations placed on the operation by
the bibliography at the end of the chapter. the system properties. The curves AB and BC represent
solution compositions that are in equilibrium with solids
whose compositions are given by the lines AD and CE,
II. EQUILIBRIUM AND MASS AND respectively. If AD and CE are vertical and coincident
ENERGY BALANCES with the left and right extremes, the crystals are pure S and
R, respectively. Crystallization from any solution whose
A. Solid–Liquid Equilibrium equilibrium composition is to the left of a vertical line
through point B will produce crystals of pure S, while
The solubility of a chemical species in a solvent refers
solutions with an equilibrium composition to the right of
to the amount of solute that can be dissolved at constant
the line will produce crystals of pure R. A solution whose
temperature, pressure, and solvent composition (including
composition falls on the line through B will produce a
the presence of other solutes). In other words, it is the
mixture of crystals of R and S.
concentration of the solute in the solvent at equilibrium.
Now suppose a saturated solution at temperature T1 is
As with all multiphase systems, the Gibbs phase rule
fed to a crystallizer operating at temperature T2 . Since it is
provides a useful tool for determining the number of inten-
saturated, the feed has a mole fraction of R equal to xF . The
sive variables (ones that do not depend on system mass)
maximum production rate of crystals occurs when the so-
that can be fixed independently:
lution leaving the crystallizer is saturated, meaning that the
NDF = Nc − Np + 2 (1) crystal production rate, m prod , depends on the value of T2 :
NDF is the number of degrees of freedom, Nc is the num- m prod = m F xF − m L xL (2)
ber of components, and Np is the number of phases in the where m F is the feed rate to the crystallizer and m L is the
system. The number of degrees of freedom represents the solution flow rate leaving the crystallizer. Note that the
number of independent variables that must be specified lower limit on T2 is given by the eutectic point, and that
in order to fix the condition of the system. For example, attempts to operate the crystallizer at a temperature other
the Gibbs phase rule specifies that a two-component, two- than the eutectic value will result in a mixture of crystals
phase system has two degrees of freedom. If temperature of R and S.
and pressure are selected as the specified variables, then When certain solutes crystallize from aqueous solu-
all other intensive variables—in particular, the composi- tions, the crystals are hydrated salts, which means that
tion of each of the two phases—are fixed, and solubility the crystals contain water and solute in a specific stoichio-
diagrams of the type shown for a hypothetical mixture of metric ratio. The water in such instances is referred to as
R and S in Fig. 1 can be constructed. water of hydration, and the number of water molecules
Several features of the hypothetical system described associated with each solute molecule may vary with the
in Fig. 1 illustrate the selection of crystallizer operating crystallization temperature.
Potassium sulfate provides an example of such behav-
ior. When it crystallizes from an aqueous solution above
40◦ C, the crystals are anhydrous K2 SO4 , while below
40◦ C each molecule of K2 SO4 that crystallizes has 10
molecules of water associated with it. The hydrated salt,
K2 SO4 ·10H2 O(s), is called potassium sulfate decahydrate.
Another solute that forms hydrated salts is magnesium
sulfate, which can incorporate differing amounts of water
depending upon the temperature at which crystallization
occurs (see Table I).
The solubility diagrams of several species are shown
in Fig. 2, and these illustrate the importance of solubility
behavior in the selection of the mode of crystallization.
For example, consider the differences between potassium
nitrate and sodium chloride: The solubility of potassium
nitrate is strongly influenced by the system temperature,
whereas the opposite is true for sodium chloride. As a
FIGURE 1 Hypothetical solubility diagram of eutectic-forming consequence, (1) a high yield of potassium nitrate crys-
system. tals can be obtained by cooling a saturated feed solution,
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
94 Crystallization Processes
but (2) cooling a saturated sodium chloride solution ac- sion of the complex solubility behavior in such systems
complishes little crystallization, and vaporization of water by graphical means usually is limited to systems of two
is required to increase the yield. solutes. The interaction of added solutes on solubility is
The effect of water of hydration on solubility can be seen illustrated by the plot of equilibrium behavior for potas-
in Fig. 2. Note, for example, that sodium sulfate has two sium nitrate–sodium nitrate–water in Fig. 3. As before,
forms in the temperature range of the solubility diagram: the curves in the diagram trace solution compositions that
sodium sulfate decahydrate (Na2 SO4 ·10H2 O), which is are in equilibrium with solid solutes. Points A, D, G, and
known as Glauber’s salt, and anhydrous sodium sulfate. J are based on the solubilities of pure potassium nitrate,
Since a transition from Glauber’s salt to anhydrous sodium while points C, F, I , and L are based on solubilities of
sulfate occurs at approximately 34◦ C, crystals recovered pure sodium nitrate. Curves AB, DE, GH, and JK repre-
from a crystallizer operating above about 34◦ C will be sent compositions of solutions in equilibrium with solid
anhydrous, but those from a crystallizer operating below potassium nitrate at 30, 50, 70, and 100◦ C, respectively.
this temperature will contain 10 waters of hydration. Also Curves BC, EF, HI, and KL represent compositions of so-
observe the effect of water of hydration on solubility char- lutions in equilibrium with solid sodium nitrate. Should
acteristics; clearly, cooling crystallization could be used to the solution condition, including temperature, correspond
recover significant yields of Glauber’s salt but evaporative to points B, E, H , K or any condition on the curve con-
crystallization would be required to obtain high yields of necting these points, crystals of both solutes would be
the anhydrous salt. formed by cooling.
Mixtures of multiple solutes in a single solvent are en- A second type of solubility behavior is exhibited by
countered in a number of processes—for example, in the mixtures that form solid solutions. Consider, for exam-
recovery of various chemicals from ores or brines. Expres- ple, a hypothetical system containing R and S whose
Crystallization Processes 95
96 Crystallization Processes
is assumed to be saturated. Under such conditions (re- If specific enthalpies are unavailable, they can be es-
ferred to in the crystallization literature as Class II or fast- timated based on defined reference states for both solute
growth behavior), the solute concentration in the mother and solvent. Often the most convenient reference states are
liquor can be assigned a value corresponding to satura- crystalline solute and pure solvent at an arbitrarily chosen
tion. Should the supersaturation in the mother liquor be reference temperature. The reference temperature selected
so great as to affect the solute balance, the operation is usually corresponds to that at which the heat of crystal-
said to follow Class I or slow-growth behavior. In Class I lization, Ĥ c , of the solute is known. (The heat of crystal-
behavior, the operating conditions affect the rate at which lization is approximately equal to the negative of the heat
solute is crystallized, and an expression coupling the rate of solution.) For example, if the heat of crystallization is
of growth to a solute balance must be used to describe known at Tref , then reasonable reference conditions would
the system. Such treatment will be considered beyond the be the solute as a solid and the solvent as a liquid, both at
scope of this discussion. Tref . The specific enthalpies could be estimated then as:
The solution of mass and energy balances requires sol-
ubility and enthalpy data on the system of interest. Various Ĥ F = xF Ĥ c + C pF (T − Tref ) (4)
methods of presenting solubility data were given earlier, Ĥ C = C pC (T − Tref ) (5)
and the use of solubilities to estimate crystal production
rates from a cooling crystallizer was demonstrated by the Ĥ L = xL Ĥ c + C pL (T − Tref ) (6)
discussion of Eq. (2). Subsequent to determining the yield,
the rate at which heat must be removed from the crystal- where xF and xL are the mass fractions of solute in the
lizer can be calculated from an energy balance: feed and mother liquor, respectively. All that is required
now to determine the required rate of heat transfer is the
m C Ĥ C + m L Ĥ L − m F Ĥ F = Q (3) indicated heat capacities, which can be estimated based
on system composition or measured experimentally.
where m F , m C , and m L are feed rate, crystal production Now suppose some of the solvent is evaporated in the
rate, and mother liquor flow rate, respectively; Ĥ is spe- crystallizer. Independent balances can be written on total
cific enthalpy of the stream corresponding to the subscript; and solute masses:
and Q is the required rate of heat transfer to the crystallizer.
As m F , m C , and m L are known or can be calculated from a mF = mV + mL + mC (7)
simple mass balance, determination of Q requires estima- xF m F = xL m L + xC m C (8)
tion of specific enthalpies. These are most conveniently
obtained from enthalpy-composition diagrams, which are Assuming that the streams leaving the crystallizer are in
available in the general literature for a number of sub- equilibrium, there is a relationship between the temper-
stances. ature (or pressure) at which the operation is conducted
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
Crystallization Processes 97
and xL and xC . In addition, an energy balance must be where µi is the chemical potential of solute i at the existing
satisfied: conditions of the system, µi∗ is the chemical potential of the
solute equilibrated at the system conditions, and ai and ai∗
m F Ĥ F + Q = m V Ĥ V + m L Ĥ L + m C Ĥ C (9)
are activities of the solute at the system conditions and at
The specific enthalpies in the above equation can be deter- equilibrium, respectively. Less abstract definitions involv-
mined as described earlier, provided the temperatures of ing measurable system quantities are often used to approx-
the product streams are known. Evaporative cooling crys- imate supersaturation; these involve either temperature or
tallizers (described more completely in Section V) operate concentration (mass or moles of solute per unit volume or
at reduced pressure and may be considered adiabatic. In mass of solution or solvent) or mass or mole fraction of
such circumstances, Eq. (9) is modified by setting Q = 0. solute. Recommendations have been made that it is best to
As with many problems involving equilibrium relation- express concentration in terms of moles of solute per unit
ships and mass and energy balances, trial-and-error com- mass of solvent. For systems that form hydrates, the so-
putations are often involved in solving Eqs. (7) through (9). lute should include the water of hydration, and that water
should be deducted from the mass of solvent.
Consider, for example, a system at temperature T with
III. NUCLEATION AND GROWTH KINETICS a solute concentration C, and define the equilibrium tem-
perature of a solution having a concentration C as T ∗ and
The kinetics of crystallization have constituent phenom- the equilibrium concentration of a solution at T as C ∗ .
ena in crystal nucleation and growth. The rates at which These quantities may be used to define the following ap-
these occur are dependent on driving forces (usually ex- proximate expressions of supersaturation:
pressed as supersaturation), physical properties, and pro-
cess variables, but relationships between these quantities 1. The difference between the solute concentration and
and crystallization kinetics often are difficult to express the concentration at equilibrium, Ci = Ci − Ci∗
quantitatively. As a result, empirical or qualitative links 2. For a solute whose solubility in a solvent increases
between a process variable and crystallization kinetics are with temperature, the difference between the
useful in providing guidance in crystallizer design and op- temperature at equilibrium and the system
eration and in developing strategies for altering the prop- temperature, T = T ∗ − T
erties of crystalline products. 3. the supersaturation ratio, which is the ratio of the
Nucleation and growth can occur simultaneously in a solute concentration and the equilibrium
supersaturated environment, and the relative rates at which concentration, Si = Ci /Ci∗
these occur are primary determinants of the characteris- 4. The ratio of the difference between the solute
tics of the crystal size distribution; one way of influencing concentration and the equilibrium concentration to
product size distributions is through the control of vari- the equilibrium concentration, σi = (Ci − Ci∗ )/Ci∗ =
ables such as supersaturation, temperature, and mixing Si − 1, which is known as relative supersaturation.
characteristics. Obviously, those factors that increase nu-
cleation rates relative to growth rates lead to a crystal size Any of the above definitions of supersaturation can be used
distribution consisting of smaller crystals. In the discus- over a moderate range of system conditions, but as outlined
sion that follows, an emphasis will be given to the general in the following paragraph, the only rigorous expression
effects of process variables on nucleation and growth, but is given by Eq. (10).
the present understanding of these phenomena does not The definitions of supersaturation ratio and relative su-
allow quantitative a priori prediction of the rates at which persaturation can be extended to any of the other variables
they occur. used in the definition of supersaturation. For example,
defining Sai = ai /ai∗ gives:
A. Supersaturation µi γi Ci
= ln Sai = ln ∗ ∗ (11)
RT γi Ci
Supersaturation is the thermodynamic driving force for
both crystal nucleation and growth; and therefore, it is Therefore, for ideal solutions or for γi ≈ γi∗ ,
the key variable in setting the mechanisms and rates by µi Ci
which these processes occur. It is defined rigorously as the ≈ ln ∗ = ln Si (12)
RT Ci
deviation of the system from thermodynamic equilibrium
and is quantified in terms of chemical potential, Furthermore, for low supersaturations (say, Si < 1.1),
ai µi
µi = µi − µi∗ = RT ln ∗ (10) ≈ Si − 1 = σi (13)
ai RT
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
98 Crystallization Processes
The simplicity of Eq. (13) results in the use of relative liquor transformed to a slurry of very fine crystals with
supersaturation in most empirical expressions for nucle- only a slight increase in supersaturation, for example by
ation and growth kinetics. While beguilingly simple, and decreasing the solution temperature.
correct in limiting cases, great care should be taken in ex- The effect of exogenous solid matter (as in heteroge-
tending such expressions beyond conditions for which the neous nucleation) in the supersaturated solution is equiv-
correlations were developed. alent to that of a catalyst in a reactive mixture. Namely,
ν
For ionic solutes, ai = a± , which leads to Sai = it is to reduce the energy barrier to the formation of a
∗ ν
(a± /a± ) and new phase. In effect, the solid matter reduces the interfa-
cial energy surf by what may amount to several orders of
µi γi± Ci
= ν ln Sai = ν ln ∗ ∗ (14) magnitude.
RT γi± Ci The classical nucleation theory embodied in Eq. (16)
∗
Again, for γi± ≈ γi± , has a number of assumptions and physical properties
that cannot be estimated accurately. Accordingly, empir-
µi Ci ical power-law relationships involving the concept of a
≈ ν ln ∗ = ν ln Si (15)
RT Ci metastable limit have been used to model primary nucle-
ation kinetics:
The term primary nucleation is used to describe both ho- where kN and n are parameters fit to data and σmax is
mogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation mechanisms in the supersaturation at which nuclei are observed when
which solute crystals play no role in the formation of new the system is subjected to a specific protocol. Although
crystals. Primary nucleation mechanisms involve the for- Eq. (17) is based on empiricism, it is consistent with the
mation of crystals through a process in which constituent more fundamental Eq. (16).
crystal units are stochastically combined. Both homo-
geneous and heterogeneous nucleation require relatively C. Secondary Nucleation
high supersaturations, and they exhibit a high-order de-
pendence on supersaturation. As will be shown shortly, Secondary nucleation is the formation of new crystals
the high-order dependence has a profound influence on through mechanisms involving existing solute crystals; in
the character of crystallization processes in which primary other words, crystals of the solute must be present for
nucleation is the dominant means of crystal formation. secondary nucleation to occur. Several features of sec-
The classical theoretical treatment of primary nucle- ondary nucleation make it important in the operation of
ation that produces a spherical nucleus results in the ex- industrial crystallizers: First, continuous crystallizers and
pression: seeded batch crystallizers have crystals in the magma that
can participate in secondary nucleation mechanisms. Sec-
16π 3
v 2
ond, the requirements for the mechanisms of secondary
B ◦ = A exp − 3 3 surf
3k T [ln(σ + 1)]2 nucleation to be operative are fulfilled easily in most in-
dustrial crystallizers. Finally, many crystallizers are oper-
σ <0.1 3
16π surf v2 ated in a low supersaturation regime so as to maximize
≈ A exp − 3 3 2 (16) yield, and at such supersaturations the growth of crystals
3k T σ
is more likely to produce desired morphologies and high
where k is the Boltzmann constant, surf is the interfacial purity; these low supersaturations can support secondary
surface energy per unit area, v is molar volume of the nucleation but not primary nucleation.
crystallized solute, and A is a constant.
The theory shows that the most important variables af-
1. Mechanisms
fecting the rates at which primary nucleation occur are
interfacial energy surf , temperature T , and supersatura- Secondary nucleation can occur through several mecha-
tion σ . The high-order dependence of nucleation rate on nisms, including initial breeding, contact nucleation (also
these three variables, especially supersaturation, is impor- known as collision breeding), and shear breeding. Al-
tant because, as shown by an examination of Eq. (16), a though a universal expression for the kinetics of secondary
small change in any of the three variables could produce an nucleation does not exist, a working relationship often can
enormous change in nucleation rate. Such behavior gives be obtained by correlating operating data from a crystal-
rise to the often observed phenomenon of having a clear lizer with a semi-empirical expression. Guidance as to the
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
Crystallization Processes 99
form of the expression and the variables that it should in- energy may have a high-order dependence on rotational
clude can be obtained by understanding the various mech- speed and, if that is the case, modest changes in this vari-
anisms of secondary nucleation. able could alter nucleation rates substantially. The fraction
Initial breeding results from immersion of seed crys- of the impact energy transmitted from an impeller to the
tals in a supersaturated solution, and it is thought to be crystal can be manipulated by changing the material of
caused by dislodging extremely small crystals that were construction of the impeller. The influence of using soft
formed on the surface of larger crystals during drying. Al- materials to coat impellers or crystallizer internals may
though this mechanism is unimportant in continuous and vary from one crystalline system to another; those systems
unseeded batch crystallization, it can have a significant in which the crystal face is soft may be more susceptible
impact on the operation of seeded batch crystallizers. The to nucleation rate changes than those crystalline systems
number of crystals formed by initial breeding, has been where the face is hard.
found to be proportional to the surface area of crystals Supersaturation has been observed to affect contact nu-
used to seed a batch crystallizer. Characteristics of the cleation, but the mechanism by which this occurs is not
resulting distribution are affected strongly by the growth clear. There are data that infer a direct relationship be-
kinetics of nuclei resulting from initial breeding, and the tween contact nucleation and crystal growth; these data
phenomenon of growth-rate dispersion (which will be dis- showed that the number of nuclei produced by an impact
cussed later) can lead to erroneous conclusions regarding was proportional to the linear growth rate of the impacted
the nucleation kinetics. face. This could indicate that the effect of supersaturation
Shear breeding results when supersaturated solution is to alter growth rates and, concomitantly, the charac-
flows by a crystal surface and carries with it crystal precur- teristics of the impacted crystal faces; alternatively, what
sors believed formed in the region of the growing crystal appears to be a mechanistic relationship actually could be
surface. High supersaturation is required for shear breed- a result of both nucleation and growth depending upon
ing to produce significant numbers of nuclei. supersaturation.
Contact nucleation in industrial processes results from Another theory that could account for the effect of su-
collisions of crystals with the impeller used for circulation persaturation on contact nucleation is based on the view
of the magma or with other crystallizer internals such as that nuclei formed cover a range of sizes that includes the
baffles, pipe and crystallizer walls, and even other crystals. critical nucleus. Since only the nuclei larger than the crit-
Careful experimental studies have shown that the num- ical nucleus are stable, the relationship of the size of the
ber of crystals produced by collisions between crystals critical nucleus to supersaturation reflects the dependence
and these objects depends upon the collision energy, su- of contact nucleation on supersaturation. This concept,
persaturation at impact, supersaturation at which crystals which has been referred to as a survival theory, seems to
mature, material of the impacting object, area and angle have been refuted by measurements of the sizes of crystals
of impact, and system temperature. The collision energy formed by collisions. These sizes are much larger than the
for contact nucleation is small and does not necessarily critical nucleus, and the survival theory would have little
result in the macroscopic degradation or attrition of the influence on the number of nuclei that survive.
contacted crystal. Evidence of the formation of polymolecular clusters in
Nucleation from collisions between crystals in the cir- supersaturated solutions may provide a mechanistic inter-
culating magma and the rotor in a circulation pump or an pretation of the effect of supersaturation on contact nu-
agitator usually dominate nucleation resulting from other cleation kinetics. These clusters may participate in nucle-
collisions. The operating variables in systems of this type ation, although the mechanism by which this would occur
can be manipulated to some extent, thereby modifying is not clear. One model that has been proposed, however,
nucleation rates and the concomitant crystal size distri- calls for the formation of a semi-ordered region consisting
bution. For example, internal classification can be used to of molecular clusters awaiting incorporation into the crys-
keep larger crystals away from energetic collisions with an tal lattice. Collisions or fluid shear of the region containing
impeller, but doing so may create other problems with sta- high cluster concentrations could then result in these clus-
bility of the crystal size distribution. The rotational speed ters serving as secondary nuclei. In such a model, the vari-
of an impeller can be changed if there are appropriate con- ables that influence formation and diffusion of the clusters
trols on the pump or agitator. Caution must be exercised, also influence crystal growth rates and nucleation.
however, for a reduction in circulation velocity can reduce
heat-transfer coefficients and increase fouling (encrusta-
2. Kinetic Expressions
tion) on heat-transfer surfaces. Moreover, the crystals in
the magma must be kept suspended or crystal morphol- Irrespective of the actual mechanisms by which con-
ogy and growth rates could be affected adversely. Impact tact nucleation occurs, empirical power-law expressions
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
provide a useful means of correlating nucleation kinetics Multicrystal-magma studies usually involve examina-
and using the resulting correlations in process analysis and tion of the rate of change of a characteristic crystal di-
control. The correlations generally take the form: mension or the rate of increase in the mass of crystals in
a magma. The characteristic dimension in such analyses
B ◦ = k N σ i MT N k
j
(18)
depends upon the method used in the determination of
where kN , i, j, k are positive parameters obtained from crystal size; for example, the second largest dimension is
data correlation, MT is the magma density (mass of solids measured by sieve analyses, while an equivalent spherical
per unit volume of slurry or solvent in the magma), and N diameter is determined by both electronic zone sensing
is the rotational velocity of the impeller or pump rotor. For and laser light scattering instruments. A relationship be-
convenience, either crystal growth rate or mean residence tween these two measured dimensions and between the
time, both of which are directly related to supersaturation, measured quantities and the actual crystal dimensions can
may be substituted for σ in Eq. (18). be derived from appropriate shape factors. Volume and
If primary nucleation dominates the process, i tends area shape factors are defined by the equations:
to larger values (say greater than 3), j and k approach
vcrys = kvol L 3 and acrys = karea L 2 (19)
zero, and Eq. (18) approaches Eq. (17). Should crystal–
impeller and/or crystal–crystallizer impacts dominate, j where vcrys and acrys are volume and area of a crystal,
approaches 1; on the other hand, if crystal–crystal contacts kvol and karea are volume and area shape factors, and L
dominate, j approaches 2. is the characteristic dimension of the crystal. Suppose an
The ease with which nuclei can be produced by con- equivalent spherical diameter L sphere is obtained from an
tact nucleation is a clear indication that this mechanism electronic zone-sensing instrument, and the actual dimen-
is dominant in many industrial crystallization operations. sions of the crystal are to be calculated. Assume for the
Research on this nucleation mechanism is continuing with sake of this example that the crystals have a cubic shape.
sphere
the objective of building an understanding of the phe- Let L cube be the edge length of the crystal and kvol and
nomenon that will allow its successful inclusion in models cube
kvol be the volume shape factors for a sphere and a cube,
describing commercial systems. respectively. Since the volume of the crystal is the same,
regardless of the arbitrarily defined characteristic dimen-
D. Fundamentals of Crystal Growth sion,
sphere
Crystal growth rates may be expressed as (1) the linear vcrys = kvol L 3sphere = kvol
cube 3
L cube (20)
advance rate of an individual crystal face, (2) the change sphere
Since kvol is π/6 and kvol cube
is 1.0, the numerical rela-
in a characteristic dimension of a crystal, or (3) the rate of tionship between L cube and L sphere is given by:
change in mass of a crystal or population of crystals. These
sphere 1/3 1/3
different expressions are related through crystal geometry; kvol π
it is often convenient to use the method of measurement L cube = cube
L sphere = L sphere (21)
kvol 6
as the basis of the growth rate expression or, in certain
instances, the method used to analyze a crystallization The rate of change of a crystal mass dm crys /dt can be
process will require that growth rate be defined in a spe- related to the rate of change in the crystal characteristic
cific way. For example, the use of a population balance dimension (d L/dt = G) by the equation:
to describe crystal size distribution requires that growth
dm crys d ρkvol L 3 dL
rate be defined as the rate of change of a characteristic = = 3ρkvol L 2 (22)
dimension. dt dt dt
Single-crystal growth kinetics involve the advance rate where ρ is crystal density. Since karea = acrys /L 2 ,
of an individual crystal face normal to itself or the rate of
change in crystal size associated with exposure to a super- dm crys
= 3ρ(kvol /karea )acrys G (23)
saturated solution. The advance rate of a single crystal face dt
can be quantified by observation of the face through a cali- At least two resistances contribute to the kinetics of
brated eyepiece of an optical microscope, which allows ex- crystal growth. These resistances apply to (1) integration
amination of the structure of the advancing crystal face and of the crystalline unit (e.g., solute molecules) into the crys-
isolation of surface-reaction kinetics from mass-transfer tal surface (i.e., lattice), and (2) molecular diffusion or bulk
kinetics (these phenomena will be discussed later). An transport of the unit from the surrounding solution to the
additional advantage of single-crystal systems is that it is crystal surface. As aspects of molecular diffusion and mass
possible to examine crystal growth kinetics without inter- transfer are covered elsewhere, the current discussion will
ference from competing processes such as nucleation. focus only on surface incorporation.
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
Occlusions find their way into the crystal structure when The characteristic macroscopic shape of a crystal re-
the supersaturation in close proximity to the crystal surface sults, in large measure, from the internal lattice structure;
is high enough to lead to an unstable surface. Such insta- surfaces are parallel to planes formed by the constituent
bility leads to the creation of dendrites, which then join units of the crystal. Moreover, although the Law of Con-
to trap mother liquor in pools of liquid within the crystal. stant Interfacial Angles is a recognition that angles be-
Occlusions are often visible and can be avoided through tween corresponding faces of all crystals of a given sub-
careful control of the supersaturation in the crystallizer. stance are constant, the faces of individual crystals of that
Mother liquor can be flushed from a cake of crystals substance may exhibit varying degrees of development.
on a filter or centrifuge by washing with a liquid that also As a result, the general shape or habit of a crystal may
may dissolve a small portion of the cake mass. To be ef- vary considerably.
fective, the wash liquid must be spread uniformly over Crystal morphology (i.e., both form and shape) affects
the cake and flow through the porous material without crystal appearance; solid–liquid separations such as filtra-
significant channeling. Such washing is hindered when tion and centrifugation; product-handling characteristics
the crystals themselves have significant cracks, crevices, such as dust formation, agglomeration, breakage, and
or other manifestations of breakage or the mother liquor washing; and product properties such as bulk density,
has a viscosity that is significantly greater than the wash dissolution kinetics, catalytic activity, dispersability, and
liquid. In the latter event, significant channeling (also caking.
called fingering) may reduce the effectiveness of the wash The shape of a crystal can vary because the relative rates
process. of growth of crystal faces can change with system con-
Lattice substitution requires that the incorporated im- ditions; faster growing faces become smaller than faces
purity be of similar size and function to the primary crys- that grow more slowly and in the extreme may disappear
tallizing species. In other words, the impurity must fit from the crystal altogether. For illustration, consider the
into the lattice without causing significant dislocations. two-dimensional crystal shown in Fig. 7a and the process
An example of such a system is found in the crystalliza- variables that would cause the habit to be modified to the
tion of L-isoleucine in the presence of trace quantities of forms shown in Figs. 7b and c. The shape of the crystal
L-leucine. The two species have similar molecular struc- depends on the ratio of the growth rate of the horizontal
tures, differing only by one carbon atom in the position faces, G h , to the growth rate of the vertical faces, G v . For
of a methyl side group. In this system, the incorporation the shapes shown in Fig. 7,
of L-leucine in L-isoleucine crystals is proportional to the
Gh Gh Gh
concentration of L-leucine in the mother liquor. Moreover, < < (27)
the shape of the recovered crystals changes as the content Gv b Gv a Gv c
of L-leucine in recovered crystal increases. Growth rates depend on the presence of impurities,
system temperature, solvent, mixing, and supersaturation,
and the importance of each may vary from one crystal face
B. Crystal Morphology
to another. Consequently, an alteration in any or all of these
Both molecular and macroscopic concepts are important variables can result in a change of the crystal shape.
in crystal morphology. Molecular structures (i.e., the ar- Modeling intermolecular and intramolecular inter-
rangements of molecules in specific lattices) can greatly actions through molecular mechanics calculations has
influence the properties of a crystalline species and varia- advanced significantly in the past decade, and it has pro-
tions from a single structure lead to the prospect of poly- vided the basis for prediction of the equilibrium shape of
morphic systems. In such systems, the molecular species
of the crystal can occupy different locations depending
on the conditions at which the crystal is formed, and both
microscopic and macroscopic properties of the crystal can
vary depending on the polymorph formed. There is, in gen-
eral, a single stable polymorph for prevailing conditions,
but that polymorph may not have been formed during the
crystallization process. In such cases, system thermody-
namics will tend to force transformation from the unstable
polymorph to the stable one at rates that may vary from
being nearly instantaneous to infinitely slow. Additional
discussion of the molecular structures of crystalline ma-
terials has been provided elsewhere. FIGURE 7 Effect of facial growth rates on crystal shape.
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
a known crystalline species. While not yet uniformly suc- 1. Intrinsic growth rates
cessful on a quantitative basis, the definition and modeling a. Temperature: The growth rates of individual
of crystal lattice potential energy equations has provided crystal faces depend on temperature, typically
an understanding of crystal growth and morphology on the following an Arrhenius rate law:
molecular level. Derivation of external crystal morphol-
ogy from internal lattice structures via simulation has been E G
G = G 0 exp − (28)
proven possible for several organic compounds. Numeri- RT
cal minimization techniques, coupled with the appropriate If different crystal faces have different activation
valence and nonbonded energy expressions, have enabled energies, variation of the temperature at which
accurate determination of favorable molecular arrange- crystallization takes place modifies individual
ments within a wide variety of molecular crystals. growth rates to varying degrees and results in a
The shape of crystals obtained as a result of following modified crystal shape.
a specific crystallization protocol may be unsatisfactory b. Mixing: The intensity of mixing may determine
and, as a result, methods for modifying the habit of con- the degree to which bulk mass transfer is involved
siderable interest. The predictive capabilities cited in the in growth kinetics, and this can influence the
preceding paragraph are of great utility in such an instance resulting crystal shape.
as they may be used to determine factors leading to the c. Supersaturation: The dependence of growth
unsatisfactory shape and guide subsequent experiments in kinetics on supersaturation may vary from one
which a more desirable shape is sought. Inevitably, such a crystal face to another. Accordingly, different
search involves extensive laboratory or bench-scale exper- prevailing supersaturations can lead to different
iments to determine processing variations that will lead to crystal shapes.
a desired crystal shape.
2. Interfacial behavior
As an example of the variations in shape that can be ex-
hibited by a single crystalline material, consider the forms a. Solvent: Different solvents exhibit different
of potassium sulfate shown in Fig. 8. Clearly, the process- interactions with crystal faces and can alter crystal
ing characteristics and particulate properties of the differ- shape. A change in solvent also can alter the
ently shaped potassium sulfate crystals will vary. stoichiometry of the crystal (e.g., from a hydrated
The mechanisms and variables affecting crystal shape to an anhydrate stoichiometry), which can produce
can be categorized as follows: crystals with quite different morphology.
b. Surfactants: Addition of a surfactant to a
crystallizing system can influence the crystal
shape in a manner illustrated schematically in
Fig. 9. Here, surfactant molecules are shown being
attracted to crystal faces in varying ways; the
hydrophilic head groups favor the horizontal faces,
while the hydrophobic tail groups are
preferentially attracted to the vertical faces. A
growth unit must displace the surfactant to
approach a growing crystal face. As hydrophilic
interactions are typically much stronger than
hydrophobic ones, the growth unit preferentially
enters the vertical faces and growth in the
horizontal direction is favored.
3. Access to growth site
a. Blockage by species attracted to growth site:
Impurities may preferentially locate at a kink or
other favored growth site and block growth at that
site. A difference in the character of the kink or
growth site from one face to another could result
in modification of the crystal shape.
FIGURE 8 Shapes of K2 SO4 crystals. [From Mullin, J. W. (1993). b. Species partially fitting into crystal lattice: In
“Crystallization,” 3rd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, London. With these instances, an impurity molecule is comprised
permission.] of two parts, one that fits into the crystal lattice
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
and a second that does not. The part that does not lation distribution relates the number of crystals at each
fit repulses incoming growth units or causes size to the size, while the mass distribution expresses how
significant interatomic stress because of its mass is distributed over the size range. In the following
position in the crystal lattice. If such species are paragraphs, methods for describing and using distribution
purposely added to the crystallizing system to functions will be outlined.
modify crystal morphology, they are referred to as Size distribution is a major determinant of the proper-
tailor-made additives. ties of crystalline products, especially appearance, and to
downstream processing and handling of crystalline mate-
rials. Solid–liquid separation by filtration or centrifugation
C. Crystal Size Distributions
can be straightforward with a desired CSD, but it can be
Most crystallization processes produce particles whose disastrous when an inappropriate one increases resistance
sizes cover a range of varying breadth. If the particles to liquor flow through a filter or centrifuge cake. Like-
consist of single crystals, the resulting distribution is a wise, CSD affects other downstream processing such as
crystal size distribution (CSD); on the other hand, if the the removal of impurities and mother liquor by washing,
particles consist of agglomerates or other combination of dissolution or reaction of the crystals, and transporting or
multiple crystals, the distribution is a particle size dis- storing crystals.
tribution. In either case, the distribution is expressed in Crystal size distributions may be expressed by: (1) his-
terms of either population (number) or mass. The popu- tograms, which are the amount or fraction of mass or
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
number over each increment in size; (2) cumulative distri- The method by which crystals are sized gives either
butions, which are the total or fraction of mass or number number or mass of crystals in a given size range. The sieve
below (or above) a given size; and (3) density functions, analysis in the above example gives mass distributions, so
which are the derivatives (with respect to size) of cumu- that the histogram is constructed in terms of crystal mass,
lative distributions. These definitions will be illustrated and a cumulative mass distribution, M(L), can be defined
by considering a hypothetical potassium nitrate system as the mass of crystals in the sample passing through the
from which a 1-liter slurry sample has been withdrawn, sieve of size L. In other words,
filtered, washed, dried, and sieved to give the results shown
in Table II.
L(i)
M(L) = Mi (29)
The first three and the sixth columns give the sieve data
L=0
and should be read as follows: All of the sieved matter
passed through the 707-µm sieve, and 7.296 g remained Such calculations give the mass of crystals below size L,
on the 500-µm sieve and had an arithmetic average size of and the results are shown in column 4 of Table II. Column
603.5 µm. Similar descriptions can be given for crystals 5 gives the cumulative mass fraction distribution:
that remained on the other sieves and pan (L = 0). The
total crystal mass recovered was 39.974 g. A histogram of M(L)
F(L) = (30)
the mass distribution from these data is shown in Fig. 10. Mtotal
Transforming a mass distribution to a number distri- From Eq. (37), it can be demonstrated that the total num-
bution, or vice versa, requires a relationship between the ber of crystals, the total length, the total area, and the
measured and desired quantities. The mass of a single total volume of crystals, all in a unit of sample volume,
crystal, m crys , is related to crystal size by the volume shape can be evaluated from the zeroth, first, second, and third
factor, kvol (see Eq. (19)): moments of the population density function. Moments of
the population density function also can be used to esti-
m crys = ρkvol L 3 (31)
mate number-weighted, length-weighted, area-weighted,
Consequently, the number of crystals on a sieve in the and volume- or mass-weighted quantities. These averages
example, Ni , can be estimated by dividing the total mass are calculated from the general expression:
on sieve i by the mass of an average crystal on that sieve. If m j+1
the crystals on that sieve are assumed to have a size equal L̄ j+1, j = (38)
mj
to the average of the sieve through which they have passed
and the one on which they are held, L̄ i = (L i−1 + L i )/2, where j = 0 for a number-weighted average, 1 for a length-
then: weighted average, 2 for an area-weighted average, and
Mi 3 for a volume- or mass-weighted average.
Ni = (32) Crystal size distributions may be characterized usefully
ρkvol L̄ i3
(though only partially) by a single crystal size and the
Potassium nitrate crystals have a density of 2.11 × 10−12 spread of the distribution about that size. For example,
g/µm3 , which allows for the determination of the esti- the dominant crystal size represents the size about which
mated crystal numbers on each sieve in Table II. A cumu- the mass in the distribution is clustered. It is defined as
lative number distribution, N (L), and a cumulative num- the size, L D , at which a unimodal mass density function
ber fraction distribution, F(L), can be calculated using is a maximum, as shown in Fig. 11; in other words, the
methods similar to those for calculating M(L) and W (L). dominant crystal size L D is found where dm/d L is zero.
Mass and population densities are estimated from (The data used to construct Fig. 11 are from Table II.) As
the respective cumulative number and cumulative mass the mass density is related to the population density by:
distributions:
m = ρkv n L 3 (39)
Mi
m( L̄) = (33) the dominant crystal size can be evaluated from the pop-
L i
ulation density by:
Ni
n( L̄) = (34) d(n L 3 )
L i =0 at L = LD (40)
So that if L i → 0, dL
∞ The spread of the mass-density function about the dom-
d M(L)
m(L) = ⇒ M(L) = m dL (35) inant size is the coefficient of variation (c.v.) of the CSD.
dL 0
and
∞
d N (L)
n(L) = ⇒ N (L) = n dL (36)
dL 0
Equations (33) and (34) are used to obtain the last two
columns of Table II.
In the example, all of the results are for the given sam-
ple size of 1 liter and the quantities estimated have units
reflecting that basis. This basis volume is arbitrary, but use
of the calculated quantities requires care in defining this
basis consistently in corresponding mass and population
balances. The volume of clear liquor in the sample is an
alternative, and sometimes more convenient, basis.
Moments of a distribution provide information that can
be used to characterize particulate matter. The jth moment
of the population density function n(L) is defined as:
∞
mj = L j n(L) d L (37) FIGURE 11 Mass–density function with single mode showing
0 dominant size.
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
typical population density data obtained from a crystal- are fixed, the crystal size distribution is determined in its
lizer meeting the stated assumptions. The slope of the plot entirety. In addition, such distributions have the following
of such data may be used to obtain the growth rate while characteristics:
the intercept can be used to estimate nucleation rate.
Many industrial crystallizers operate in a well-mixed or r Mass density function (from Eq. (39)):
near well-mixed manner, and the equations derived above
L ◦
can be used to describe their performance. Also, the sim- m = ρkvol n L exp − 3
(59)
plicity of the equations describing an MSMPR crystallizer Gτ
make experimental equipment configured so as to meet r Dominant crystal size (from Eq. (40)):
the assumptions leading to Eq. (54) useful in determining
nucleation and growth kinetics. From a series of runs at L D = 3Gτ (60)
different operating conditions, correlations of nucleation r Moments of n (from Eq. (37)):
and growth kinetics with appropriate process variables can
be obtained (see, for example, the discussions of Eqs. (18) m i = i!n ◦ (Gτ )i+1 (61)
and (25)). The resulting correlations can then be used to r Total number of crystals per unit volume:
guide either crystallizer scale-up or the development of an ∞
operating strategy for an existing crystallizer. NT = n d L = m 0 = n ◦ Gτ (62)
It is often very difficult to measure supersaturation, 0
especially in systems that have high growth rates. Even r Total length of crystals per unit volume:
though the supersaturation in such systems is so small ∞
that it can be neglected in writing a solute mass balance, LT = n L d L = m 1 = n ◦ (Gτ )2 (63)
it is important in setting nucleation and growth rates. In 0
such instances it is convenient to substitute growth rate r Total surface area of crystals per unit volume:
for supersaturation by combining Eqs. (18) and (25). This ∞
gives: AT = karea n L 2 d L = karea m 2 = 2karea n ◦ (Gτ )3
0
B ◦ = knuc G i MT N k
j
(58) (64)
r Total solids volume per unit volume:
The constant knuc depends on process variables other than
∞
supersaturation, magma density, and intensity of mixing;
VTS = kvol n L 3 d L = kvol m 3 = 6kvol n ◦ (Gτ )4
these include temperature and presence of impurities. If 0
sufficient data are available, these variables may be sepa- (65)
r The coefficient of variation of the mass density
rated from the constant by adding more terms in a power-
law correlation. knuc is specific to the operating equipment function (from Eq. (42)) is 50%.
r The magma density M (mass of crystals per unit
and not transferable from one equipment scale to another. T
The system-specific constants i and j are obtainable from volume of slurry or liquor) is the product of the crystal
experimental data and may be used in scale-up, although density, the volumetric shape factor, and the third
j may vary considerably with mixing conditions. moment of the population density function:
As shown by Eq. (54), growth rate G can be obtained MT = 6ρkvol n ◦ (Gτ )4 (66)
from the slope of a plot of the log of population density
against crystal size; nucleation rate B ◦ can be obtained System conditions often allow for the measurement of
from the same data by using the relationship given by magma density, and in such cases is should be used as
Eq. (57), with n ◦ being the intercept of the population a constraint in evaluating nucleation and growth
density plot. Nucleation rates obtained by these proce- kinetics from measured population densities. This
dures should be checked by comparison with values ob- approach is especially useful in instances of
tained from a mass balance (see the later discussion of uncertainty in the determination of population
Eq. (66)). densities from sieving or other particle sizing
The perfectly mixed crystallizer of the type described techniques.
in the preceding discussion is highly constrained. Alter-
ation of the characteristics of crystal size distributions
B. Preferential Removal of Crystals
produced by such systems can be accomplished only
by modifications of the nucleation and growth kinetics As indicated above, crystal size distributions produced in
of the system being crystallized. Indeed, examination of a perfectly mixed crystallizer are constrained by the na-
Eq. (54) shows that once nucleation and growth kinetics ture of the system. This is because both liquor and solids
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
have the same residence time distributions, and it is the Clear-liquor advance is used for two purposes: (1) to
crystal residence time distribution that gives the popula- reduce the quantity of liquor that must be processed by
tion density function the characteristic exponential form the solid–liquid separation equipment (e.g., filter or cen-
in Eq. (54). Nucleation and growth kinetics can influence trifuge) that follows the crystallizer, and (2) to separate
the population density function, but they cannot alter the the residence time distributions of crystals and liquor. The
form of the functional dependence of n on L. reduction in liquor flow through the separation equipment
Crystallizers are made more flexible by the introduc- can allow the use of smaller equipment for a fixed produc-
tion of selective removal devices that alter the residence tion rate or increased production through fixed equipment.
time distributions of materials flowing from the crys- Separating the residence time distributions of crystals and
tallizer. Three removal functions—clear-liquor advance, liquor means that crystals will have an average residence
classified-fines removal, and classified-product removal— time longer than that of the liquor. This should, in princi-
and their idealized removal devices will be used here to ple, lead to the production of larger crystals, but because
illustrate how design and operating variables can be ma- the crystallizer is otherwise well mixed, the crystal pop-
nipulated to alter crystal size distributions. Idealized repre- ulation density will have the same form as that for the
sentations of the three classification devices are illustrated MSMPR crystallizer (Eq. (54)).
in Fig. 17. The analysis goes as follows: Let Vin , VCL , and Vout
Clear-liquor advance from what is called a double draw- represent volumetric flow rates of clear liquor fed to the
off crystallizer is simply the removal of mother liquor crystallizer, of clear-liquor advance, and of output slurry
without simultaneous removal of crystals. The primary ac- respectively. The population density function is given by
tion in classified-fines removal is preferential withdrawal the expression:
from the crystallizer of crystals of a size below some spec-
ified value; this may be coupled with the dissolution of the ◦ L
n = n exp − (67)
crystals removed as fines and the return of the resulting Gτprod
solution to the crystallizer. Classified-product removal is
carried out to remove preferentially those crystals of a where τprod = VT /Vout . Increasing VCL decreases Vout and
size larger than some specified value. In the following thereby increases the residence time of the crystals in the
discussion, the effects of each of these selective removal crystallizer. Unless the increase in magma density results
functions on crystal size distributions will be described in in significant increases in nucleation, the utilization of
terms of the population density function n. Only the ideal clear-liquor advance will produce an increase in the dom-
solid–liquid classification devices will be examined. It is inant crystal size. Often the increase is much greater than
convenient in the analyses to define flow rates in terms that predicted from theory, and it is suspected that this is
of clear liquor. Necessarily, then, the population density because the stream being removed as clear liquor actu-
function is defined on a clear-liquor basis. ally contains varying amounts of fines. If this is the case,
FIGURE 17 Schematic representations of idealized removal functions. (a) Clear-liquor advance, (b) classified-fines removal, (c) classified-
product removal.
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
possibilities in selecting cooling profiles, T (t), or vapor The identification of an initial condition associated with
generation profiles, V (t), or time dependencies of precip- the crystal size distribution is very difficult. If the system
itant or nonsolvent addition rates. is seeded, the initial condition becomes:
For illustrative purposes, consider that the protocol for
a cooling crystallizer can involve either natural cooling— n̄(L , 0) = n̄ seed (L) (82)
cooling resulting from exposure of the crystallizer con- where n̄ seed is the population density function of the seed
tents to a heat sink without intervention of a control crystals. If the system is unseeded, the nuclei often are
system—or manipulation of cooling to reduce the sys- assumed to form at size zero.
tem temperature in a specific manner. In both cases, the The rate of cooling, or evaporation, or addition of dilu-
instantaneous heat-transfer rate is given by: ent required to maintain specified conditions in a batch
Q = U A(T − Tsink ) (79) crystallizer often can be determined from a population-
balance model. Moments of the population density func-
where U is a heat-transfer coefficient, A is the area avail- tion are used in the development of equations relating the
able for heat transfer, T is the temperature of the magma, control variable to time. As defined earlier, the moments
and Tsink is the temperature of the cooling fluid. If Tsink is are
a constant, the maximum heat-transfer rate and, therefore, ∞
the highest rate at which supersaturation is generated are mi = L i n̄ d L (83)
0
at the beginning of the process. This protocol can lead to
excessive primary nucleation and the formation of encrus- Recognizing that the zeroth moment is the total number
tations on the heat-transfer surfaces. of crystals in the system, it can be shown that:
The objective of programmed cooling is to control the dm 0 d NT
rate at which the magma temperature is reduced so that su- = n̄ ◦ G = B ◦ = (84)
dt dt
persaturation remains constant at some prescribed value,
usually below the metastable limit associated with pri- Moment transformation of Eq. (80) leads to the following
mary nucleation. Typically the batch is cooled slowly relationship:
at the beginning of the cycle and more rapidly at the ∂m j
end. An analysis that supports this approach is presented = j Gm j−1 (85)
∂t
later. In size-optimal cooling, the objective is to vary
the cooling rate so that the supersaturation in the crys- Combining Eq. (85) with the relationships of moments
tallizer is adjusted to produce an optimal crystal size to distribution properties developed in Section VI.A for
distribution. j = 1, 2, 3 gives:
Protocols similar to those described above for cool- dm 1 m 0 =NT d L T
ing crystallizers exist for crystallization modes involving = Gm 0 −→ = G NT (86)
dt dt
evaporation of solvent and the rate at which a non solvent
dm 2 m 1 =L T d AT
or a reactant is added to a crystallizer. = 2Gm 1 −→ = 2Gkarea L T (87)
A population balance can be used to follow the devel- dt dt
opment of a crystal size distribution in batch crystallizer, dm 3 karea m 2 =AT d MT kvol
= 3Gm 2 −→ = 3Gρ AT (88)
but both the mathematics and physical phenomena being dt dt karea
modeled are more complex than for continuous systems
at steady state. The balance often utilizes the population where NT is the total number of crystals, L T is total crystal
density defined in terms of the total crystallizer volume, length, A T is total surface area of the crystals, and MT is
rather than on a specific basis: n̄ = nVT . Accordingly, the the total mass of crystals in the crystallizer. In addition to a
general population balance given by Eq. (51) can be mod- population balance, a solute balance must also be satisfied:
ified for a batch crystallizer to give: d(VT C) d MT
+ =0 (89)
∂(nVT ) ∂(GnVT ) ∂ n̄ ∂(G n̄) dt dt
+ = + =0 (80)
∂t ∂L ∂t ∂L where VT is the total volume of the system, and C is solute
concentration in the solution.
The solution to this equation requires both an initial con-
The above equations can be applied to any batch crys-
dition (n̄ at t = 0) and a boundary condition (usually ob-
tallization process, regardless of the mode by which su-
tained by assuming that crystals are formed at zero size):
persaturation is generated. For example, suppose a model
B ◦ (t) is needed to guide the operation of a seeded batch crys-
n̄(0, t) = n̄ ◦ (t) = (81) tallizer so that solvent is evaporated at a rate that gives
G(0, t)
P1: GAE/LSK P2: FLV Final Pages
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN004D-ID159 June 8, 2001 15:47
a constant crystal growth rate G and no nucleation; in an appropriate dependence of system temperature on time.
other words, supersaturation is to be held constant and The result depends upon the relationship of solubility to
only those crystals added at the beginning of the run are in temperature. If that relationship is linear, the cooling rate
the crystallizer. Model development proceeds as follows: varies with time in a parabolic manner; i.e.,
combining the solute balance, Eq. (89), with Eq. (88), dT
− = C1 t 2 + C2 t + C3 (100)
d(VT C) 3ρ AT kvol G dt
+ =0 (90)
dt karea An approximation to the temperature–time relationship
Recognizing that the process specification requires C to that serves as a good starting point for establishing a fixed
be a constant and taking the derivative of Eq. (90): protocol is given by:
3
d 2 VT kvol d AT t
C + 3ρ G =0 (91) T = T0 − (T0 − Tfinal ) (101)
dt 2 karea dt τ
where τ is the overall batch run time.
⇓ Eq. (87)
It is clear that stringent control of batch crystallizers
is critical to obtaining a desired crystal size distribution.
d 2 VT
C + 6ρkvol G 2 L T = 0 (92) It is also obvious that the development of a strategy for
dt 2 generating supersaturation can be aided by the types of
Taking the derivative of the last equation: modeling illustrated above. However, the initial conditions
in the models were based on properties of seed crystals
d 3 VT d LT
C 3
+ 6ρkvol G 2 =0 (93) added to the crystallizer. In operations without seeding,
dt dt initial conditions are determined from a model of primary
⇓ Eq. (86) nucleation.