A Level Economics
A Level Economics
Measures of satisfaction:
1) Total utility- the overall satisfaction derived from the consumption of all
units of good over a period of time
2) Marginal utility- the additional utility derived from consuming one
more unit of a particular good.
In this case, the consumer has allocated income in a way that maximizes total
utility, resulting in consumer equilibrium.
The equi-marginal principle is based on these assumptions:
1) The consumer has limited income
2) The consumer will always behave rationally
3) The consumer seeks to maximize their utility
Chapter 30.3: Derivation of an individual
demand curve
Marginal Utility can be used to explain how an
individual’s demand curve is derived.
As the price of a good decreases, the consumer’s
purchasing power increases, which increases the
utility derived from the consumption of the good.
In the real world, utility isn’t the only factor that influences what a consumer
purchases, there are other factors that we must consider.
The indifference curve slopes downwards to indicate that a fall in the quantity
consumed of Good Y is accompanied by a rise in the amount consumed of Good
X, given the same level of satisfaction.
Higher indifference curves represent higher levels of satisfaction.
The marginal rate of substitution is the rate at which a consumer is willing to
substitute one good for another.
Consumers are restricted in what they can buy due to their limited disposable
income and the prices of goods. These two principles of consumer behavior are
brought together with a budget line.
There would be a shift in the budget line if the price of Good X or Good Y
changes while the income is unchanged.
If the price of Good X falls, a rational consumer would substitute Good X for
Good Y, and buy more of Good X. This is known as the substitution effect of
price change.
If the price of Good X falls, the consumer would have more money to spend on
other goods, which means real income has increased, which means the
consumer could buy even more of Good X. This is known as the income effect
of price change.
Substitution Effect:
1) A fall in the price of Good X makes it relatively cheaper compared to its
substitutes
2) Some consumers will switch to Good X leading to higher demand
3) Much depends on whether products are close substitutes
If income increases:
1) This will allow the consumer to choose a better combination of Good X
and Good Y.
2) More of each could be consumed if both are normal goods.
If income falls:
1) The budget line shifts downwards in a parallel way.
2) This would indicate that both are normal goods and less of each will be
consumed
3) In case of an inferior good, there will be an increase in
consumption of this good.
Chapter 32-Efficiency
Chapter 32.1: Introduction to Efficiency
Economic Efficiency: Where scarce resources are used most efficiently to
produce maximum output.
Efficiency represents the best possible solution to the fundamental economic
problem.
Marginal cost is the cost of producing one more unit of a particular good and it
represents the opportunity cost of the resources used to produce this last unit.
When the price is equal to the marginal cost, the consumers are prepared to
pay what it costs to produce the last unit.
Producer: A firm whose demand for factors of production is derived from the
needs of operating factories.
The task for producers is to combine factors of production in an effective way
to be efficient, competitive, and profitable in the world market.
They have to either find the least cost or most
efficient combination of labor and capital to
produce the given quantity of output.
Firms have to choose between alternative
production methods.
Marginal Product is the increase in total product that occurs from an additional
unit of input.
As the number of workers increases, output increases at a decreasing rate, and
the marginal product declines. This concept is known as a diminishing return
and is referred to as the law of diminishing returns/law of variable
proportions.
Average Product is the measure of labor productivity and is calculated by using
this formula: 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡/𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑑.
A firm and its entrepreneur must consider all the costs of the factors of
production involved in the final output.
There are the private costs directly incurred by the owners.
Production may create external costs for others but these are not taken into
account by the firm.
A firm is an economic organization that transforms factor inputs such as raw
materials with capital equipment, labor, and enterprise to produce goods and
services for the market.
Marginal cost is the addition to the total cost when making one extra unit of
output.
The most important cost curve for the firm is the average total cost (ATC)
which shows the cost per unit of output.
The decision to increase output will raise the total cost, marginal cost will be
positive as extra inputs are used and firms will only be keen to increase output
when the expected sales revenue outweighs the extra cost of production.
- The shape of the short-run average cost and marginal cost curves
The shape of the short-run ATC is the result of the interaction between the
average fixed cost and the average variable cost.
All factors of production are variable in the long run, this gives the firm much
greater scope to vary the respective mix of its factor inputs so that is producing
at the most efficient level.
If capital becomes relatively cheaper than labor or a new production process is
invested, which is likely to increase productivity, firms can then reorganize
how they produce.
With labor, it is easy to know the costs, but it is more difficult to estimate costs
for the other factors of production, the best combination of factors can be
arrived at as their price varies.
The map shows the different combinations of labor and capital that can be
used to produce various levels of output, from which it is possible to read off
the combinations of labor and capital that could produce these output levels.
- Returns to scale
As production increases, relatively less capital and labor are required per unit
of output, this is referred to as increasing returns to scale, as production
expands further, increasing amounts of capital and labor are needed to
produce, which is indicated by the increasing width of the gap between the
isoquants, indicating decreasing returns to scale
In the long run, labor and capital can be varied, the actual mix will depend
upon their prices
Isocosts are lines of constant relative costs for factors of production.
Each of the isocosts shown has an identical slope.
In deciding how to produce, the firm will be looking for the most economically
efficient or least-cost process, this is obtained by bringing together the
isoquants and isocosts, so linking the physical and economic sides of the
production process.
The point where the isocost is tangential to an isoquant represents the best
combination of factors for the firm to employ, the expansion path or long-run
production function of the firm can be shown by joining together all of the
various tangential points and is therefore useful from a longer-term planning
perspective.
In practice:
- it is challenging for firms to determine their isoquants, they do not have
the data or the staff know how to do this.
- it is also assumed that in the long run, it is possible to switch factors of
production, which may not always be as easy.
- some employers may be reluctant to switch labor and capital- they may
feel that they have a social obligation to their workforce and will not
alter their production plans with a change in relative factor prices.
In the very long run, technological change can alter the way the entire
production process is organized, including the nature of products themselves,
which shifts the firm’s product curves upwards and its cost curves downwards
since firms are more efficient as a consequence of new technologies.
A firm can find a way of lowering its cost structure over time, by increasing the
amount of capital used relative to labor, with a consequent increase in
productivity.
The LRAC curve is a flatter U-shaped curve compared to the SRAC and is
indicative of experiencing falling long-run costs over time, which allows a
firm to lower its prices without sacrificing profit.
In industries, where the minimum efficient scale is low there will be a large
number of firms, and there will be competition between a few large players if
the minimum efficient scale is high.
Chapter 34.6: Internal and External Economies and
Diseconomies of Scale
The shape of the LRAC is used to explain economies of scale.
A firm experiences economies of scale if costs per unit of output fall as the
scale of production increases, which is shown by the downward-sloping
section of the LRAC curve.
If a firm gets increasing returns from using its factors of production, it can
produce more goods with smaller quantities of factors of production, which
means the firm is producing at a lower average cost.
The shape of the LRAC slopes upwards after the minimum point, because
beyond a certain size, a firm’s costs per unit of output may increase as the size
of output continues to increase, this is called diseconomies of scale.
They occur because the firm’s output is rising proportionally faster than the
inputs, which means that the firm is getting increasing returns to scale, if the
increase in output is proportional to the increase in inputs, the firm will get
constant returns to scale and the LRAC will be horizontal.
If the output is less than proportional, the firm will see diminishing returns to
scale or diseconomies of scale.
The advantage for a firm in benefiting from economies of scale is a reduction
in the long-run average cost as the scale of output increases, which can occur
in various ways:
- Technical economies refer to the advantages gained directly in the
production process through more efficient production methods, some
production techniques only become viable beyond a certain level of
output.
- Diseconomies of scale
A firm can expand its scale of output too much, with the result that average
costs start to rise, and efficiency is compromised which is indicative of
diseconomies of scale.
The concept of opportunity cost is relevant as the entrepreneur may ask for
capital that could have been used elsewhere at no risk, this would have earned
an income.
Any profit over and above normal profit is known as supernormal profit (total
profit-normal profit)
Firms enter markets where supernormal profits are being earned.
Subnormal profit is where the profit that is earned by a firm is less than the
normal profit, a firm may decide to withdraw from a market in the long run.
- Barriers to entry
Barriers to entry are a range of obstacles that deter or prevent new firms from
entering a market to compete with existing firms.
Barriers to entry give firms a degree of market power, and the decisions can be
made by existing firms without the risk of their market share or price being
challenged from outside.
There are legal barriers, market barriers, and cost barriers that help reduce
new competition in existing markets, as these make it harder for new firms to
enter the markets, due to saturation and the range of products provided by
existing firms or patents that prevent new firms from using similar technology
without which cost of production is higher and it becomes unprofitable to
enter markets.
Existing firms can exploit customers and enjoy market power.
Economies of scale can be barriers because existing large producers can
produce at a lower average cost than those just starting up.
It allows large firms to cut their price to eliminate any high-cost producers,
which is known as predatory pricing.
- Barriers to exit
If a firm is shutting down, then costs such as research and development costs
cannot be recovered.
The resources are not easily transferred to other uses.
The sunk costs that cannot be easily recoverable act as a barrier to exit from
the existing industry as capital investment will be lost.
It is the risk of entering and the high cost of failure that deters potential
entrants.
Perfect Competition
- Some buyers and sellers have perfect knowledge of the market
conditions and the price that is charged.
- No individual firm has any influence on the market price, firms are
described as being price takers, and the ruling price is determined by the
forces of market demand and output of all firms
- The products are homogeneous or identical, they are all of the same
quantity and are identical in the eyes of the consumer.
- There is complete freedom of entry into and exit from the market
- All firms and consumers have complete information about products,
prices, and means of production
Agriculture is the only industry that comes anywhere near the theoretical
model.
In perfect competition, the firm cannot influence the market price, and
individual firms make only a small contribution to output that no change in
their output can significantly affect the total supply.
The demand curve facing the firm is therefore perfectly inelastic at the market
price.
The marginal revenue is also equal to the price or the average revenue.
The only decision to be made by the firm is the amount of output to be
produced, depending on the production costs.
The firm will aim to maximize profits, the chosen output will be where
marginal revenue equals marginal costs, because the revenue from the last
unit of output is equal to the opportunity cost of producing it.
If the total cost of producing an output is lower than the total revenue, then the
firm is making a supernormal profit, if TC=TR, then the firm will be breaking
even and making a normal profit.
Costs can be higher than the revenue, a firm may be about to exit the industry,
or a firm can continue production making short-run losses, as long as the
price received by the firm covers the AVC, usually the cost of paying the wage
bill and buying the materials for production, this is the shut-down price (a
firm will stop production when price falls below average variable cost)
The firm would be making a loss equivalent to the amount of fixed costs.
When the price is less than AVC, if the firm continues to produce, it will be
making a loss even greater than its fixed costs.
In perfect competition, firms will only make different amounts of profit from
each other if they have different cost structures, their behavior is strictly
limited and the only way to boost profit would be to increase productivity and
lower average total cost.
The long-run equilibrium is where the only firms left are the most efficient,
making a normal profit.
Firms hold no market power, supernormal profit has competed away, and the
only firms that continue to participate in the market, in the long run, are
productively and allocatively efficient.
Monopolistic competitive
Monopolistic competition is the market structure closest to the model of
perfect competition because of the large number of competing firms.
In the long run, profit-maximizing firms will only be able to achieve normal
profit covering all the production costs and the opportunity cost of capital.
The behavior of firms in this market structure lies in the concept of product
differentiation, the development of a strong brand image must be seen as an
act of investment on the part of the individual firm, which highlights the
important roles that advertising and promotions play in this market structure.
Marketing shifts the firm’s demand curve to the right at the expense of
competitors but will also reduce the price elasticity of demand if the
consumers feel there are fewer close substitutes, which is known as brand
loyalty as consumers will not shift back to rival products.
This competitive tool is taken up by all firms.
If advertising is not effective for all firms, those who are successful might take
advantage of their greater market share and brand loyalty to charge a higher
price, these firms would increase their sales revenue and by doing so move to
the portion of the demand curve where price elasticity of demand is elastic.
The constraint on the firm is that there is a freedom of entry into the market,
which threatens the existence of supernormal profit in the long run, and by a
combination of market and product innovation, individual firms can postpone
the long-run equilibrium if the total market is growing.
There are a large number of competitors using a combination of price
competition and non-price competition (added value) to increase their
market power.
Oligopoly
Oligopoly is defined as a market situation where the total output is
concentrated in the hands of a few firms, it is possibly the most realistic model
of a market structure, but the theory doesn’t provide definite predictions
regarding the price and output of the firm that exist in every other model.
The difficulty in studying oligopoly is that behavior can follow two very
different routes, there is aggressive competition in some industries, while in
others there is a suggestion of cooperation or collusion.
Oligopolists are price makers, but one of the dangers of using this tactic is that
the firm can be drawn into a price war.
An oligopolist would only start a price war if its costs of production were
significantly lower than those of its rivals.
A price war may be the natural outcome of events, such as overcapacity in the
industry or the entry of new firms, it could also be a defensive tactic where an
oligopoly is losing market share to its rivals.
If firms are highly diversified, a firm may be prepared to sacrifice profits by
cutting the price in an attempt to increase or even retain market share.
Profits from some of its activities may be used to cover short-term losses
elsewhere in the business.
If a firm increases its price, this will not be followed by all firms as they have
little to gain since their revenue is likely to fall.
If the price is reduced, there will be the same reaction from all firms because
revenue will be compromised.
The oligopolist’s best position at the kink, any changes in costs will not lead to
a price increase, prices will tend to stay the same and to change little over time,
which results in price rigidity in the market as indicated within the limits.
It is argued that the model shows the kink at a certain price and output level
which has been chosen arbitrarily, where the kink should be, is unknown.
It doesn’t represent how firms behave in real oligopolistic markets, price
competition can be intense as firms battle to retain market share and to
combat threats from new entrants.
Monopoly
A pure monopoly is where a single firm controls the entire output of the
industry.
Monopoly is also used to describe a situation where one firm has a very large
share of the market.
Monopolies are at the opposite end of the spectrum to perfect competition.
It can only occur when a firm has a dominant position in terms of its market
share.
A profit-maximizing monopolist
would choose the output where
MC=MR, this output will be over the
price range where demand is price
elastic and will be sold at the price
consumers are willing to pay, if the
total revenue is higher than the
production costs, it will make a
supernormal profit.
Natural Monopoly
A natural monopoly is a market situation where a monopolist has
overwhelmed cost advantage.
In theory, this can occur where a monopoly has sole ownership of a resource or
where past ownership of capital resources means that it is difficult and
extremely expensive for competitors to duplicate these factors of production,
it would also be wasteful to do so.
- the profit can be used to finance product innovation, which will add to
the consumer welfare in the future, through improvement in the
product’s performance or through widening consumer choice.
Deregulation occurs when barriers to entry into an industry are removed, and
any changes to the structure of transport and other former public sector
industries incorporate provisions for contestability.
The fewer barriers to entry and the lower the cost of entry, the more
contestable will the market be.
The exit must also be costless, which means that in the perfectly contestable
market, firms will have no sunk costs (when they leave the market, they can
resell any assets that they have used without loss).
If this isn’t possible, then potential entrants might be put off from entering a
market, and sunk costs would be seen as a barrier to entry.
The result of costless entry and exit is that contestable markets are
characterized by what is known as ‘hit and run’ entry.
If a firm is attracted to enter a market due to the high levels of profits being
earned by existing firms, on entry; a firm would take a share of the profits but
then leave once profit levels fell back to normal.
In this way, firms are unable to earn a supernormal profit in the long run.
In theory, as long as the entry is free and exit is costless, any market structure
could meet the requirements of a perfectly contestable market:
- monopolistic competition has few barriers to entry, due to non-price
competition, it takes small firms time to build up a customer base to
obtain brand loyalty.
In this type of market, there are barriers to entry in the form of licensing
and regulatory requirements.
- in oligopolistic markets, there are high barriers to entry, particularly in
the form of capital costs of entry and expenditure that are essential to
build up market share.
As a result, the monopolist’s price and profit are reduced, while it produces the
same level of output to maximize the volume of sales, normal profit will be
earned since average costs equal average revenue.
Small firms are mainly found in the service sector, in retail, food production,
automotive, and personal and business services.
There is a recent trend in many economies for small knowledge and
research-oriented firms to provide services for much larger manufacturing
companies.
There are many reasons why so many small firms exist in a world where
market power lies with large multinational companies, some of which are as
follows:
- there are economic activities where the size of the market is too small to
support large firms
- the firm may involve specialist skills possessed by very few people
- where the product is a service- such as lawyers, accountants,
hairdressers, dentists, and small shops, the firm will be small to offer
the customers personal attention for which they will pay a higher price.
- small firms may be the big firms for tomorrow, although the number of
small firms is huge, only a very small percentage of them grow to
become big businesses.
- the entrepreneur may not want the firm to get bigger because extra
profit is not the only objective and growth might involve a loss of control
over the running of the business.
- recession and rising unemployment can trigger an increase in the
number of business start-ups as former employees try to become
self-employed.
- small businesses may receive financial help under government
enterprise schemes because of their job creation and local growth
possibilities.
- the increased access to technology through the internet and electronic
devices has made small businesses more efficient and more able to
compete with larger ones.
For large firms, such as multinational companies, growth is strongly linked
with the pursuit of profit.
The motives behind a large firm’s growth include the following:
- the desire to achieve a reduction in long-run average costs through the
benefits of economies of scale, which allows firms to compete more
effectively with rivals because they can afford to cut prices without
sacrificing profits, this has often been the main motive for mergers and
acquisitions for large corporations, they gain economies of scale by bulk
buying, giving them a competitive edge in global markets.
- to achieve a bigger market share to boost sales revenue and profits, this
is referred to as a monopoly motive, but it could be a defensive strategy
to maintain market share in anticipation of action by rivals.
there is a strong argument that only big firms can compete in markets
where multinationals are present in the global market.
Firms also grow through diversification where firms produce or sell a range of
different products because this tends to spread risk or exploit an opportunity
in the market.
Chapter 36.3: Integration
Integration refers to how the individual parts of a firm come together, which
could be through:
- A merger, where two firms agree to join up with each other
- An acquisition or purchase whereby one firm takes over control of
another
It can also lead to access to new markets, increasing market power, and
by reducing competition, the opportunity to make abnormal profits.
The danger is that this sort of growth may sometimes be blocked by
governments who are concerned about possible monopoly abuse.
The long-term survival of a cartel depends upon the high barriers to entry but
there are threats to a cartel, such as:
- the possibility of a price war, whereby one firm breaks rank to capture a
bigger market share
- if some members have higher costs than others, resulting in fewer
profits due to the agreed fixed price
- if there is no dominant member that has the power to control others
- legal obstacles such as in the EU and USA where cartels are illegal since
they restrict competition and do not act in the best interest of consumers
In small firms, this is most likely to be the owner or partners who agree on how
growth might or might not occur, they have the authority to act.
In large firms, especially those with shareholders, a gulf in decision-making
between firms’s management and ownership can arise, which is known as the
principal-agent problem.
This occurs when one person (the agent) makes decisions on behalf of another
person (the principal).
The agent through day-to-day involvement in the firm has more information
than the principal, this is also an example of asymmetric information and
moral hazard.
The problem is that the principal is unaware of how the agent will act, the
principal is also not sure that the agent will act in the principal’s best interests.
In the case of a firm’s growth, the agent may have plans and a strategy that
differ from those of the principal, the agent may decide to act in their interest
and if successful, the agent stands to gain prestige and enhance their career
development.
The principal is not aware of what the growth plans involve, this is called
agency cost.
If the firm produces up to the point where the cost of making the last unit is
just covered by the revenue from selling it, then the profit margin will have
fallen to zero and total profits will be at their greatest.
There are several reasons why firms do not operate at the profit maximization
level of output:
- it is difficult to identify this output, the firm may simply work out the
average total cost and then add on a standard profit margin to determine
the selling price, this cost-plus pricing technique is unlikely to result in
maximum profit.
- short-term profit maximization may not be in the long-run interest of
the firm, since firms with large market shares wish to avoid the
attention of government regulatory bodies.
- large supernormal profits may attract new entrants into the industry,
especially where there are low barriers to entry.
- high profits may damage the relationship between the firm and its
stakeholders, such as consumers, and the firm’s workforce as they may
see senior managers and shareholders earning large returns.
- profit maximization may not appeal to the management, who have
different objectives to the shareholders- high profits might trigger
action by the firm’s rivals and the firm could become a target for a
takeover bid, which is another example of the principal-agent problem.
- Profit satisficing
Profit-satisficing occurs when a firm seeks to make a reasonable or minimum
level of profit, sufficient to satisfy the shareholders but also to keep the
stakeholders satisfied, such as the workforce or consumers.
The firm is seen as a set of interest groups, each with its objectives which may
change over time.
Workers may expect pay rises and improvements in working conditions which
may raise costs, consumers may expect to see prices falling if there are rival
producers.
This is a long way from the profit-maximizing theory as firms may choose to
sacrifice some potential short-term profits to satisfy these expectations.
If the firm’s shareholders are divorced from the control of the firm, there may
be a conflict of interest.
The management’s motives may be concerned with growth rather than profit.
Managers may place importance on comfortable working conditions, job
security, status, and fringe benefits.
Time and money spent on these issues can raise costs and if the firm has close
rivals, it may make management more cautious because the risk of failure will
threaten their job security and career advancement prospects.
Profit satisficing can also be a feature of firms that have enjoyed a high market
share over a long time.
Complacency can lead to firms losing focus on their cost structure and failing
to devote resources to either product or process innovation, which can lead a
firm to a loss of profits or if extreme, exit the market.
- Sales maximization
This objective is to maximize the volume of sales rather than the total revenue
from sales.
Sales maximization will lead to greater output than in the case of revenue
maximization.
The firm would increase output to the break-even output where the total
revenue just covered the total cost, a higher output than this implies a
loss-making behavior.
The only situation where loss-making would be possible is where the firm
could use the profit from one part of the firm to offset losses made elsewhere
which is known as cross-subsidization.
Sales can be maximized where a firm follows an objective of growth
maximization through increasing market share.
The benefits of economies of scale can apply when a firm acquires or merges
with a competitor.
The deliberate cutting of prices to make a loss might be a strategy to deter new
entrants into the market, which is called predatory pricing and can be used to
force a rival firm out of the market.
- Revenue maximization
Revenue maximization is an alternative theory of a firm’s behaviour, related to
the principal-agent problem.
The separation of management from ownership, especially in large firms, can
result in a firm’s objective changing.
Consumers with a low price elasticity of demand need the product and can be
expected to pay a higher price for it than consumers whose demand is more
price elastic.
The overall outcome is not entirely predictable, the firm’s revenue and profits
should increase, otherwise, discrimination is pointless, the problem is that
some consumer groups benefit yet others do not because of the higher prices
they have to pay.
If the firm wishes to split the market up into different segments and charge
different prices, it must have a mechanism for keeping the markers separate, it
must also avoid the possibility of consumers buying at a low price and then
selling the product at a higher price.
Price discrimination will only work where consumers have a different
willingness to purchase have a different willingness to purchase or have
different price elasticities of demand for the product.
Price discrimination has certain advantages and disadvantages for firms and
consumers, it results in an improvement in allocative efficiency but this is
achieved by converting consumer surplus into profit, from an equity
standpoint, this is a disadvantage to consumers.
- Limit pricing
Limit pricing is a pricing policy that is applied in monopolies and oligopolies, it
involves firms setting a lower short-run price to deter new firms from entering
their market.
This market may even be contestable, these firms might have been attracted by
the supernormal profits that were being earned.
At this new price, the established firm no longer maximizes profits, but this is
only to be expected for a short time.
The lower price effectively acts as a barrier to entry, a monopolist or
oligopolist needs to increase output or the services provided to such a level that
a new firm cannot make a profit.
These tactics will likely deter the new firm from entering the market.
- Predatory pricing
Predatory pricing occurs when a firm feels threatened when a new firm enters
a market.
The established firm responds by setting a price that is so low that the new
firm has no alternative but to match it.
The new firm cannot make a profit, in time, the new firm will be forced out of
the market, and the established firm will put its prices back to their former
level.
- Price leadership
Price leadership is a common feature of an oligopolistic market, all firms in the
market accept the price that is set by the leading firm which is often the firm
with the largest market share or is the brand leader, they alter their prices in
line with those of the leader.
It is seen as a way of avoiding price competition yet maximizing total profits
for all firms while allowing various forms of non-price competition to prevail.
Closed Economy:
In a closed economy, there are two sectors: households and firms
There is only one withdrawal (savings) and one injection (investment)
Expectations also are the main reason why investments are unstable as
firms may assume during a recession or an economic downturn, it is
unprofitable to invest in capital goods.
The accelerator:
The accelerator theory focuses on induced investment and emphasizes the
volatility of the investment.
It states that investment depends on the rate of change in income and that a
change in GDP will cause a greater proportional change in investment.
If GDP is rising at a constant rate, the induced investment will not change
because firms will continue to buy the same amount of machinery each year to
expand capacity but a change in income can significantly affect investment.
An increase in demand for consumer goods does not always result in a greater
percentage change in demand for capital goods.
For example, firms will not buy more capital goods if they have spare capacity
or do not expect the consumer demand to last.
Firms may not be able to buy capital goods if those industries work close to
capacity.
With advances in technology, the capital-output ratio also changes, with fewer
resources needed to produce a given output.
- Government Spending
Government spending may increase during an economic downturn
hoping to prevent the economy from experiencing a recession.
A government may inject more into the circular flow of income to ensure
the aggregate demand is sufficient to achieve a high level of employment
and an increase in a country’s output.
- Net Exports
The key influences on net exports are the relative price and quality
competitiveness of the country’s products and incomes at home and
abroad.
The relative price competitiveness is influenced by the country’s relative
productivity, relative inflation rate, and exchange rate.
For potential economic growth to lead to higher output, the rise in productive
potential must be utilized.
Chapter 42.2: Positive and Negative Output Gaps
The difference between the actual and potential output is known as the output
gap.
A negative output gap is caused by a lack of aggregate demand.
When there is a negative output gap, there will be unemployed resources and
the economy will not be producing the full amount it is capable of producing.
Output may be beyond the maximum potential for a while because, in response
to high aggregate demand, machinery may be worked continuously, without
maintenance being undertaken and workers may be persuaded to work long
hours of overtime.
This cannot be sustained since at some point, machines have to be serviced or
repaired and workers will want to reduce the number of hours of overtime they
work.
The interaction of the multiplier and the accelerator can result in a large
rise in aggregate demand.
If firms become pessimistic, the multiplier and the accelerator will act in
reverse, causing a downward spiral in the aggregate demand.
Expansionary fiscal and monetary policies will increase real GDP and reduce
the negative output gap but the policies will either not increase aggregate
demand enough or will increase it too much. This may result in demand-pull
inflation while resulting in actual economic growth if the government
underestimates the size of the multiplier and households and firms will be
worried about economic prospects and reluctant to spend more if the
government overestimates.
There are two key aspects to the benefits of economic growth being distributed
fairly.
- In monetary terms, will all experiencing a rise in income
- In non-monetary terms, with all experiencing an improvement in
facilities like healthcare.
Creating opportunities for all means generating more job opportunities,
creating an opportunity for all workers to experience better working
conditions and opportunities for all to live safely.
Economic growth involves change. Some new industries are created but
others disappear. Those workers who are occupationally and
geographically immobile may become unemployed.
Economic growth can also be accompanied by a widening of the pay gap.
Keynesian economists argue that the labor market can be in disequilibrium for
long periods.
The disequilibrium unemployment is unemployment that arises when the
aggregate supply of labor is greater than the aggregate demand for labor at
the current wage rate and is equivalent to cyclical unemployment
The wage rate can stay above the equilibrium level for several reasons
- Aggregate demand for labor fell but the real wage rate remains
unchanged because workers resist wage cuts.
- The wage rate might also have been pushed up above the equilibrium
level by trade union action or by the government setting a national
minimum wage.
Lowering the wage rate could result in lower aggregate demand and lower
aggregate demand for labor.
The factors that determine the natural rate of unemployment in a country are
supply-side factors:
- The value of unemployment benefits relative to the value of low pay
- National minimum wage legislation
- The quality of education and training
- How workers are affected by periods of unemployment
- The quality and quantity of information about job vacancies and workers
skills and qualifications
- The degree of labor mobility
The extent to which expansionary fiscal or monetary policy tools may increase
employment will depend on several factors.
The rise in aggregate demand may not be very large if consumers and firms are
worried about the future or if firms expand their output capacity by buying
capital equipment that requires a few extra workers to operate.
Fiscal and monetary policies also have a time lag. By the time unemployment
has been recognized as a problem, policy tools have been decided upon and put
into action, and other components of aggregate demand may have started to
increase.
Bank notes and coins are usually used for smaller purchases.
Money is bank deposits is the main form of money, it is transferred from one
person to another by direct debit, credit cards, and smartphones.
The quantity theory of money seeks to explain how changes in the money
supply can have an impact on the economy.
This is based on the Fisher Equation: MV=PT (MV=PY) where M is the money
supply, V is the velocity of circulation, P is the price level and T/Y is the
transactions or output of the economy.
Both sides of the equation have to equal each other since both sides represent
the total expenditure in the economy.
For monetarists, the control of inflation is seen as the top priority for a
government.
They argue that inflation is the result of excessive economic growth of
the money supply, so they believe that the main role of the government
is to control the money supply.
They also maintain that attempts to reduce unemployment by increasing
government spending will only succeed in raising inflation in the long
run.
They think that the economy is inherently stable unless disturbed by
erratic changes in the growth of the money supply.
The proportion of liquid assets to total deposits that commercial banks keep
is known as the reserve ratio.
Commercial banks aim to achieve high profits for their shareholders mainly by
lending.
This objective conflicts with its other two objectives and a balance has to be
achieved between the three objectives.
Commercial banks have to achieve a certain level of liquidity and security.
They need to have enough liquid assets such as cash and short-term securities
that will soon be turned into cash, to meet the expected request by their
customers to withdraw their money in cash.
These liquid assets are not very profitable. No money is earned on holding cash
and commercial banks also aim for security.
They have to convince their customers that they are financially sound and to
achieve this aim, they try to ensure they have sufficient financial capital to
cover their risker loans.
A commercial bank will keep some assets that are liquid but not very profitable
and some that are profitable but not very liquid.
It may also keep some of its profits in care some of its borrowers do not repay
thief loans or firms it buys shares in go out of business.
Chapter 44.5: Causes of changes in the money supply
- An increase in commercial bank lending
- An increase in government spending financed by borrowing from
commercial banks
- An increase in government spending financed by borrowing from central
bank
- The sale of government bonds to private sector financial institutions
(quantitative easing)
- More money entering than leaving the country
When people make payments, they use credit cards, debit cards, and
online transfers and these means of payment involve a transfer of money
using entries in the records that banks keep of their customer’s deposits
rather than paying out cash.
Customers have to believe there is enough cash and liquid assets to pay
out all their deposits, which may not be the case in practice.
- Reserve Ratio
The reserve ratio helps a bank calculate how much it can lend.
The bank first works out the possible increase in its total liabilities.
𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 Χ 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑘 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑟
To work out the changes in loans (advances), the change in liquid assets
is deducted from the change in liabilities (including deposits given to
those putting in the liquid assets).
A bank is likely to change its reserve ratio if people alter the proportion
of their deposits they require in cash, if other banks alter their lending
policies, or if the country’s central bank requires banks to keep a set
reserve ratio.
- Capital ratio
The capital ratio is a commercial bank’s available financial capital
expressed as a percentage of its riskier assets.
It includes retained profits and newly issued shares.
Government securities are normally assumed to carry no risks, but some
loans can be considered risky if the economy gets into difficulties.
The higher the capital ratio a commercial bank has, the more
unexpected losses it can experience without going out of business.
The capital ratio is designed to protect the bank’s customers in the event
of a financial crisis and to promote the banking sector's stability by
discouraging excessive risk-taking.
- Quantitative Easing
When the rate of interest is very low, a central bank may decide to try to
increase aggregate demand by in the use of quantitative easing.
This involves a central bank buying both government and private
securities, of different maturities from financial institutions, including
commercial banks.
In return for the securities, the central banks credit the accounts of
commercial banks.
With more assets, the commercial banks will lend more.
This should increase the money supply and reduce the short-term and
long-term interest rates.
These changes may increase investment and consumer expenditure,
along with aggregate demand and economic activity.
This method has also been used to help markets that are in difficulties.
If export revenue imports expenditure, money will flow into the country
on the trade balance.
Exporters will deposit the money into the country’s commercial banks
which leads to a multiple increase in the money supply.
Chapter 44.6: Effectiveness of policies to reduce inflation
Contractionary monetary and contractionary fiscal policy can be used to reduce
inflation.
Supply-side policy can be used in the case of cost-push inflation.
Increased spending on training can raise labor productivity and reduce labor
costs or reduce the upward pressure on labor costs.
Lower corporate tax may encourage firms to buy more efficient capital
equipment, which also puts downward pressure on price rises.
- A government may decide that inflation is the result of the money supply
growing faster than output, but it can be difficult to control the growth
of the money supply.
This is because commercial banks have a profit incentive to increase their
loans and they are inventive in getting around any limits on bank lending.
An increase in the money supply will cause a fall in the rate of interest.
The rate of interest falls because the rise in money supply will result in more
households and firms having higher money balances that they want to hold
and they use some to buy financial assets.
A rise in demand for government bonds will cause the price of bonds to rise
and so the rate of interest to fall.
- The liquidity trap
It is expected that an increase in the money supply will cause the rate of
interest to fall, Keynes described a situation where it would not be
possible to drive down the rate of interest by increasing the money
supply as the liquidity trap.
It could occur when the rate of interest is very low and the price of bonds
is very high, speculators would expect the price of bonds to fall in the
future, so if the money supply was to be increased they would hold all the
extra money.
They would not buy bonds for fear of making a capital loss, and because
the return from holding such securities would be low.
The demand for loanable funds is the demand for money to borrow.
Households borrow money to purchase cars and houses, firms may demand
loanable funds because they are in financial difficulties or more commonly
because they want to invest.
The government may also want to borrow if it has a budget deficit.
The demand for loanable funds slopes down from left to right as borrowing
and the rate of interest are inversely related.
The lower the rate of interest, the more likely that economic agents will
borrow more.
The supply of loanable funds comes from savings, the more money that is
saved, the more money there will be available to lend.
The supply of loanable funds curve slopes up from left to right as savings and
the rate of interest are directly related.
The higher the rate of interest, the more likely economic agents will save as
they will gain a higher return.
If workers experience only short periods of unemployment, they may not lose
much income.
They are also likely to take advantage of many training or technological
developments and advances in working practices.
Those who are on low incomes also receive more benefits from an extra dollar
that the rich would have received if they kept the dollar.
The extent to which governments redistribute income varies because they have
different views on how significant can be the disincentive effect to work and
enterprise of progressive taxation.
A fall in the internal value leads to a fall in the external value of money and
vice versa.
An increase in a current account surplus may cause inflation as net exports are
making an increasing contribution to aggregate demand and more money will
be flowing into the country than leaving it.
This upward pressure on the domestic price level and downward pressure on
the internal value of the currency may be short-lived because an increasing
current account surplus may cause a rise in the exchange rate.
An appreciation may reduce the surplus and inflation rate as the price of
imported products will fall and there will be more pressure on domestic firms
to keep their prices low.
A net inflow on the financial account may reduce a country’s inflation rate if
multinational companies bring in advanced technology and increase
competitive pressure within the economy.
Chapter 46.3: The relationship between growth and inflation
A high inflation rate is likely to reduce a country’s economic growth rate.
This is because net exports are likely to fall which results in lower aggregate
demand that reduces the country’s output and reduces the growth of the
country’s output.
Expansionary fiscal policy can increase actual economic growth and reduce
cyclical unemployment.
However, the higher aggregate demand can increase demand-pull inflation
and can increase a deficit on the current account of the balance of payments.
- Unexpected responses
There is no certainty as to how households and firms will respond to changes
in fiscal policy.
A cut in income tax rates and corporate tax may not increase consumption and
investment if households and firms expect that the tax rates will soon be
reversed.
- Time Lags
Due to the time lags involved in fiscal policy, there is a risk that the policy may
act to reinforce the business cycle rather than counter it.
An economy may be entering a recession, the government will take time to
recognize the problem, decide on the policy tools it should use, and implement
them, it will also take time for households and firms to react to the changes.
By the time all the changes have occurred, the economy may be experiencing
an economic boom, and expansionary fiscal policy will have an impact when
the negative output gap has been closed and a positive output is occurring, the
fiscal policy measures adopted will add to inflationary pressure.
Fiscal policy is the main policy used to redistribute income and promote
development.
Progressive taxes and transfer payments move money from the rich to those
on low incomes.
Government spending on state healthcare and state education can also benefit
those on low income and raise life expectancy and educational performance.
There is a risk, that an increase in transfer payments may reduce the incentive
for the unemployed to seek work and the unemployed and their children may
experience greater poverty in the long run than if they have accepted a
low-paid job now.
Being in employment can increase workers’ skills and their chance of getting a
higher-paid job in the future.
- Laffer Curve
The Laffer curve shows that when tax rates are high, raising them further will
be counterproductive.
Laffer drew the curve to support his view that a cut in tax rates may increase
tax revenues by stimulating both total economic activity, because of the
greater incentive effect and declared economic activity.
- Time Lag
There is a time lag with both monetary policy and fiscal policy.
Monetary policy tends to have a shorter time lag than which exists with
fiscal policy.
It takes less time to change the rate of interest than to draw up changes
in taxes and government spending and to pass these changes into
legislation.
The central bank may raise the interest rate charges to commercial
banks to borrow from it.
The commercial bank may not pass on this increase in the interest rate
they charge their customers if they think that keeping lending at a high
level will generate more profit.
There is no guarantee that quantitative easing will be successful.
The central bank can buy financial assets from commercial banks in
return for cash.
This will increase commercial banks’ liquid assets and their ability to
lend.
If commercial banks are pessimistic about the future, they may be
reluctant to lend more as they will worried about the ability of borrowers
to repay the loans.
- Liquidity Trap
Qualitative easing has been adopted when interest rates have been low.
One limit on monetary policy is that a reduction in the interest rate may
have little impact when it is already low.
A liquidity trap may occur.
- Influence of changes in other countries
A central bank’s ability to change its interest rate is also limited by what
other central banks may want to raise its interest rate to discourage
borrowing.
If other central banks cut their interest rates or keep their cut their
interest rates or keep their interest rates low, the country’s firms may
borrow from abroad.
Foreigners may also put more money into the country’s commercial
banks to gain a higher interest rate.
This will increase the assets of the country’s commercial banks and their
ability to lend.
- Unexpected responses
As with fiscal policy, it is difficult to predict how households and firms
will respond to changes in monetary policy.
At times of optimism, a higher interest rate may not discourage
consumption and investment.
- Co-ordination
Fiscal policies and monetary policies must be coordinated.
A government’s attempt to boost economic growth may fail if the central
banks increase the interest rate.
Supply-side policy measures can be divided into those that are market-based
and those that are interventionist.
These can increase economic growth and reduce inflation but may
conflict with the objectives of redistribution of income and lower
unemployment.
It may reduce economic growth rather than increase it.
Cuts in income tax and unemployment benefits will increase the gap
between paid employment and transfer payments but they will not
necessarily increase employment and growth.
There may not be job vacancies, the unemployed may lack the skills and
qualifications to take those job vacancies that do exist or the jobs may be
in different areas for the unemployed.
Workers may decide to maintain their current disposable income and
take more leisure time.
The removal of rules and regulations may also increase the chances of
monopolies occurring, and the removal of health and safety rules may
damage the health of workers and result in accidents.
These effects could reduce labor productivity and economic growth.
Spending on education and training can take some time to have an effect
but if they are successful, they have the potential to improve all the
macroeconomic objectives.
They can increase actual and potential economic growth, reduce
inflation, improve the current account of the balance of payments,
reduce unemployment, increase development, and reduce income
inequality.
The education and training may be in areas that will not be in demand in
the future.
Workers may also not take up training opportunities.
Some governments favor trade protectionism, this approach can help protect
employment, build up infant industries, and discourage dumping.
Some factors that can limit the success of trade protection include:
- Firms can become dependent on the protection
- Other governments may retaliate leading to a trade war
- Membership of a trade bloc may prevent the government from imposing
trade restrictions on other members
- Time lags
In the case of several policy tools, there may be a series of time lags.
There may be a delay before the government recognizes that inflationary
pressure is building up - a recognition lag.
There is then the time it takes for the policy tool to influence the behavior of
households and firms- a behavioral lag
By the time a policy tool does have an impact on economic behavior, the level
of economic activity may have changed, which may make the policy tool
inappropriate.
The government may seek to use fiscal and monetary policy tools to offset the
effects of the business cycle, but these measures sometimes reinforce the
business cycle rather than acting counter-cyclically.
As well as there being a delay before households, workers and firms react to
policy tools, there is the possibility that they may not respond in the expected
way.
During an economic boom, a central bank may raise the rate of interest in the
expectation that it will encourage saving and discourage borrowing.
If households and firms are optimistic about the future, they may continue to
borrow and spend.
- Desire to win elections
Some elected governments may be tempted to introduce popular policy
tools when elections are approaching, measures such as an increase in
government spending on pensions, may win votes but not necessarily
improve economic performance.
For some countries, the financial account is the largest component of the
balance of payments.
- Financial account
The financial account forms a large part of some countries’ balance of
payments.
It records movements of funds into and out of the country.
- Capital account
For most countries, the capital account is a relatively small part of the
balance of payments, it includes non-produced, non-financial assets
like government debt forgiveness, money brought into and taken out of
the country by migrates, the sales and purchases of copyrights, patents,
trademarks and mineral rights.
More and better quality information is likely to become over time, so the
size of net errors and omissions figures usually declines.
The value of current deficits experienced by some countries should be
matched by the value of current account surpluses experienced by other
countries but due to mistakes and items being left out, this is not the
case.
They are not designed to reduce the total spending in a country but to
redirect, or switch spending to the country’s products rather than those
produced in other countries.
The intended impact is a fall in import expenditure and a rise in export
earnings.
The most commonly used policies for this are supply-side, protectionist
and exchange rate.
A government may increase spending on infrastructure to reduce the
cost and price of domestic products, impose import tariffs to reduce
demand for imports or instruct its central bank to lower the exchange
rate to lower export prices and raise import prices.
- Expenditure-reducing policy
An expenditure-reducing policy is any action taken by a government
that is designed to reduce the total level of spending in an economy.
Direct intervention will include the central bank buying or selling the
currency, it may try to influence the market demand and supply by
changing the rate of interest.
If there is a downward pressure on the exchange rate because the supply
of the currency is increasing on the foreign exchange market, the central
bank is likely to buy the currency, the central bank will also increase the
rate of interest, this may attract hot money flows with people buying the
currency to place into accounts in the country’s financial institutions.
A government may instruct its central bank to bring about a revaluation of the
currency if it thinks there is too much upward pressure on the currency.
The government may not want to sell large quantities of its currency to keep
the exchange rate down to its target rate as this action may add to the money
supply.
A government may also revalue its currency to reduce inflationary pressure, a
higher exchange rate will reduce the price of imports, which can increase the
pressure on domestic industries to become more internationally competitive.
The requirement for the combined elasticities to exceed 1 for the trade
balance of the current account balance to be improved by a change in the
exchange rate is known as the Marshall-Lerner condition.
The greater the combined PED for exports and imports, the smaller will be the
fall in the exchange rate required to improve the current account position, if
the PED is less than 1, a revaluation of the exchange rate would be the
appropriate policy strategy.
- Composite indicators
1) Human development index: this takes into account, GNI per head,
education, and health care.
Measures of income, education, and life expectancy are included as
it is thought that people’s welfare is influenced not only by the
goods and services available to them but also by their ability to
lead a long and healthy life and to acquire knowledge.
The HDI value for a country shows the distance a country has to
cover to reach the maximum value of 1.
Countries are divided into very high human development, high
human development, medium human development, and low
human development.
A country’s ranking by HDI doesn’t always match its ranking in
terms of GNI per head.
2) Measurable Economic Welfare: the measure seeks to give a fuller
picture of living standards by adjusting GDP figures to take into
account other factors that have an impact on living standards.
MPI aims to help countries understand why people are poor and
why some stay poor even when income rises, it can help
governments and international organizations target the poorest
groups in a country, and assess and coordinate national
development plans.
The change in real GDP may not reflect the true change in the quantity of
goods and services that households can enjoy if the level of undeclared
economic activity changes over time
As access to more and higher-quality products rises, the desire for even
more and better products may increase at an even faster rate.
Real GDP measures the quantity of output produced but not the quality,
output could rise but if the quality of what is produced declines then the
quality of people’s lives is likely to fall.
Working conditions tend to improve over time and working hours fall.
Even if a country is found to have a higher real GDP per head than
another country using purchasing power parities, it doesn’t mean that
its population will enjoy higher living standards.
If income is very unevenly distributed, only a small number of
households may benefit from a high average income.
- Birth rate: the number of live births per thousand of the population in
one year
- Death rate: the number of deaths per thousand of the population in one
year
- Infant mortality rate: the number of deaths of children aged under one
per thousand live births in one year
- Net migration: the difference between immigration and emigration
The birth rate is sometimes referred to as the crude birth rate as it provides
only basic information on births, it doesn’t give details on the age of those who
are giving birth.
The death rate includes the death of children aged under one year, although
countries also measure these separately in the infant mortality rate.
If the birth rate exceeds the death rate, a country is said to experience a natural
increase in population- the number of live births exceeding the number of
deaths.
Some countries with a high income per head and high development experience
a natural rate of decrease in population.
Several economies still experience a rise in population because they attract net
migration.
People may want to move to the country to gain a higher income and to enjoy a
higher living standard.
Low development is often associated with high rates of population growth, this
is due largely to increases in population size with the birth rate exceeding the
death rate.
There are several reasons for the birth rate to be high in low-income
economies:
- Need to have children to support parents in their old age
- Lack of availability of methods of birth control
- The relatively low costs of raising children
- Lack of education for women
High infant mortality rates encourage families to have more children as they
will not expect all of them to survive.
The higher birth rate of countries with low development results in a relatively
low average age of the population, this creates a high proportion of dependent,
non-productive members of the population.
Dependency ratios - the proportion of the economically inactive compared to
the labor force
This means that a proportionally small working population has to produce
enough goods and services to sustain not only themselves but also a large
number of young people who are economically dependent upon them.
As income per head, education, and healthcare start to rise, the death rate
initially tends to fall more rapidly than the birth rate, then the death rate starts
to fall more slowly with the decline in birth rate overtaking the decline in the
death rate.
High development does not eliminate the population problems but brings new
problems like an ageing population which arises from a decreasing birth rate
and a decreasing birth rate, dependency ratios are high because there is a high
proportion of old people who are reliant upon the productive proportion of the
population for support.
With people living longer, the cost of health care and pensions have been rising
and to reduce the cost of pensions, a lot of economies have increased the
retirement age.
The state of technical knowledge is constantly improving and the quality of the
other factors also continuously changes so that the optimum population for a
country is not fixed.
- Level of urbanization
Countries with a low income per head tend to have a relatively high proportion
of their populations living in rural areas, they also have rapid rates of
rural-urban migration which can put pressure on infrastructure, housing, and
schools in urban areas.
Most countries with a high income per head already have the majority of their
populations living in urban areas which results in relatively little growth in the
urban population of high-income economies.
People move from urban areas to rural areas as technological advances allow
people to work from home.
Countries with high income per head and high development tend to have most
of their labor force employed in the tertiary sector.
Economies with lower income per head and development typically have a high
dependence on the primary sector, which makes these economies vulnerable to
the forces of nature, they are dependent on agricultural products for their
exports and natural disasters can wipe out their foreign currency earnings.
Countries with high development and high income tend to export mainly
manufactured goods and services, they also tend to export a wide range
of products.
Some low-income countries rely heavily on exporting a narrow range of
products.
Tied, bilateral aid may be given to promote the industries of the donor country.
A government may seek to increase the growth of an infant industry by
requiring the recipient country that receives the aid to spend on products from
its country.
Tied aid directly increases demand for the donor country’s exports but untied
aid may also be given in the hope of increasing the donor country’s exports.
If aid does promote economic growth in the recipient country, it is likely to
result in the recipient country buying more imports, and it may be inclined to
buy from the donor country’s industries if good relationships have built up as a
result of the aid giving.
Both bilateral and multilateral aid may be given to influence the economic
policies of the recipient government, it may give aid to another country on
condition that it ends the use of child labor or that it reduces its budget deficit.
Both bilateral and multilateral aid can be given for humanitarian motives, that
is out of desire to do good.
This is usually the case with crisis aid, that is given to save lives during natural
disasters and famines.
Governments and international organizations can also recognize that the
development of other countries can increase global GDP and international
trade, also reduce the risk of negative external shocks.
- Trade
The governments of low-income countries and some middle-income countries
often argue for trade rather than aid, they argue for trade on fair terms.
There are several reasons why international trade can act as an engine for
growth, it can improve supply conditions and can reduce costs, which can lead
to a more efficient product:
- economies of scale become possible because of the larger market
- the increased competition encourages domestic entrepreneurs to
innovate and look for new techniques of production.
- trade leads to a transfer of skills and technology from high-income to
low-income and middle-income economies
- specialization and trade increase incomes and so provide increased
savings which can be used for investment.
Trade may also stimulate demand, the expansion of production to cater to the
export market may increase employment, and the result will be an expansion
of spending power in the home market that will create demand for domestic
output.
- Investment
Investment flows between countries in search of profits, interest, and
dividends, many low-income and middle-income countries have a deficit on
the current account of their balance of payments, which requires a surplus on
the financial account to cover it and is a reason why the governments of
low-income and middle-income countries seek to attract direct and portfolio
investment from other countries.
Much investment initially went from high-income countries, but there has
been an increase in investment, from what are called emerging economies
(economies that are making quick progress toward becoming high-income
economies)- these are economies that have high rates of economic growth and
are expected to have high rates of return while carrying a greater risk that
investment in high-income countries.
Chapter 52.3: The Role of Multinational Companies
One way that low-income and middle-income countries can achieve a rise in
investment is to attract multinational companies.
A multinational company is defined as a firm that operates in more than one
country.
An MNC is a business with a parent company based in one country but with
production or service operations in at least one other country.
MNCs can bring in new technology, and new ideas, add to GDP and exports,
and may generate employment.
The impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) (the setting up of production
units or the purchase of existing production units in other countries) from
MNCs has been substantial.
It has been particularly significant in the bauxite, alumina, petroleum, and
natural gas industries, there has also been considerable FDI in sugar, tourism,
and utilities.
For several reasons, not all MNCs are well-liked in the countries where they
invest.
MNCs may not create higher employment and higher incomes if they replace
domestic firms, they may deplete non-renewable resources and may create
pollution.
They send most of their profits back to their home countries and may employ
foreign rather than home labor, some of the products they sell may not
improve people’s living standards.
MNCs put pressure on governments to pursue policies that are beneficial to
them but not to the economies in which they are producing.
The mobility and considerable economic powers of MNCs mean they often
negotiate favorable tax breaks and exemptions from some environmental laws.
Several MNCs also develop monopsony power and use this power to drive down
the price they pay to the host countries’ suppliers of raw materials.
Some countries attract large large inward flows of FDI, these tend to be
countries that are expected to grow rapidly and so provide large markets
for the MNCs’ products or ones with low costs of production or abundant
supply of raw materials.
There are four main reasons why countries get into debt
- the country has a structural current account deficit, the country may
spend more on imports than it earns from its exports, or may have a net
outflow of primary and secondary income.
- the country may have been overconfident in the value of loans it could
repay
- the country may not have made good use of the funds it borrowed- a
government estimate that investing the loan in building up a new
industry may give a return and if miscalculated, the government has
problems making the interest payments.
- unexpected events can occur- there can be an unforeseen depreciation of
the exchange rate, which would be likely to increase the debt repayments
as interest is usually paid in dollars, there may also be negative demand
and supply-side shocks, like there may be a global recession reducing
demand the country’s exports or a natural disaster reducing the supply
of its exports and creating a need for greater assistance.
A high level of external debt can make it difficult and expensive for
low-income and middle-income countries to attract more funds for
development, a country’s credit rating may be reduced, resulting in the
country’s being charged a higher interest rate.
Chapter 52.5: The Role of the IMF and the World Bank
- International Monetary Fund
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) was set up in 1944 to help promote the
health of the world economy.
These activities have been central to the development of global trade since a
stable system of international payments and exchange rates is necessary for
trade to take place between two countries.
In carrying out these responsibilities, the organization has three main
functions:
- surveillance
- technical assistance
- lending
These promote global growth and economic stability by encouraging countries
to adopt sound economic policies and lending is used when member countries
experience difficulties in financing their balance of payments.
- World Bank
Established in 1944, its initial aim was to help rebuild European countries
devastated during World World II.
This organization has set two goals for the world to achieve by 2030:
- end extreme poverty by decreasing the percentage of people living on
less than $1.90 a day to no more than 3%
- promote shared prosperity by encouraging income growth of the bottom
40% for every country.
Households buy products from a wide range of countries, stock exchanges sell
shares and government bonds throughout the world and MNCs spread their
production throughout the world.
There are currently more restrictions on the movement of workers, but several
countries are heavily reliant on migrant labor and within trade blocs, there is
usually the opportunity for workers to work and stay in any member country.
- Indicators of globalization
Globalization can be measured in many different ways:
- consider how world trade has grown in comparison to world output, the
world trade to world output ratio is also examined.
- a connected indicator is the exports to GDP ratio of different countries
which indicates how integrated individual countries are in the global
economy.
- flows of portfolio and direct investment can be examined, and this can be
measured for an individual country or the world
- flows of migrant workers and international migration figures are also
considered.
- Customs Union
A customs union goes a stage further than a free trade area in terms of
economic integration.
Along with removing trade restrictions between members, members of a
customs union agree to impose a common external tariff with non-members.
These countries impose the same tariff on goods being imported from outside
the trading bloc, they share tariff revenues and coordinate some trading
policies.
E.g.: South African Customs Unions (SACU) - Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia,
South Africa, and Eswatini.
- Monetary Union
A monetary union includes even more economic integration, in which
restrictions are usually removed on the movement of not only goods and
services but also capital and labor.
The aim is to create a single market across members.
The key feature of a monetary union is that the member countries all use the
same currency and follow the same monetary and exchange rate policies
Trade creation permits both imports to be purchases more cheaply but also
additional exports to be sold as other members lose their tariff protection, the
domestic govermnet will lose out on tariff revenue but there is nevertheless a
welfare gain.
The lower price increase consumer surplus and reduces producer surplus and
tariff revenue.