graduation project-4
graduation project-4
University
Faculty of science
Under Supervision of
Dr / Safaa Sobhy
2024 / 2025
Content
1. Introduction
1.1. what is the field of mobile development.
1.2. emergence of the field of mobile development.
1.3. about the field.
Mobile development is a vast and rapidly evolving field within the tech
industry, playing a pivotal role in shaping how people interact with technology in
their daily lives. It involves the creation of software applications specifically
designed to run on mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets, and wearable
gadgets. Over the years, the field has witnessed exponential growth due to the
increasing reliance on mobile technology for communication, entertainment,
business, and education. Mobile development is not merely about creating
functional applications; it is about crafting seamless, user-friendly, and high-
performing experiences that cater to the needs of diverse audiences worldwide.
• Android apps: are built using Java or Kotlin with Android studio.
For example, apps like WhatsApp or Instagram have separate versions for
Android and IOS, each optimized for it’s respective platform.
Components of a Native Applications:
1. Programming Language:
• Android:
Kotlin: A modern and official android language known for
concise syntax and advanced features.
Java: A widely-used, robust language for android development.
• iOS:
Swift: A fast and secure language preferred for modern iOS
development.
Objective-C: An older language still used for maintaining legacy
iOS apps.
• iOS:
CocoaPods: Manages third-party libraries.
Alamofire: A popular libraries for network requests.
CoreData: Handles local storage and database.
Lifecycle of Native Application Development:
2• Development:
• Write the app’s code while following clean architecture principles.
• Use platform-specific APIs to integrate features like: Camera, GPS,
notifications, biometric, sensors.
3• Testing:
• Performance testing:
Android profiler for android.
Instruments for iOS.
• Emulation testing:
Android emulator and iOS simulator to test apps on virtual devices.
4• Deployment:
• Publish the app to the relevant store:
Google play store for android.
Apple app store for iOS.
• Adhere to each store’s publishing policies and quality standards.
3. Singe Page Applications (SPAs): load a single HTML page and dynamically
update content without refreshing the page. Example: Gmail, Google
Maps.
2. Native Shell (Container): The Native Shell wraps the WebView and integrates
the web application into the operating system (as, iOS, and Android). It allows
the app to appear and behave like a native application on the device. The shell
bridges the gap between the web content and device-specific features.
5. Backend/Server: Hybrid apps often interact with a backend server for dynamic
content, database access, or other services. This backend may include APIs
(RESTful or GraphQL) to communicate with the app.
Advantages:
• Cost-Efficient: Single codebase for multiple platforms reduces costs.
• Quick Development: Faster time-to-market compared to native apps.
• Easier Maintenance: Simplified updates as they affect all platforms at once.
Disadvantages:
• Limited performance: Slower than fully native apps for resource-intensive tasks.
• Design Challenges: Achieving platform-specific UI/UX consistency can be
complex.
• Dependency on Plugins: Heavy reliance on third-party plugins for native
features.
70%
20%
10 7 10 7 7 10 10 10%
5 6 6
2 2
This chart compares three types of apps: native apps, hybrid apps, and web apps
across several key metrics including performance, user experience, cost, development
time, and market share. Here’s a detailed breakdown of each metric based on a data
presented:
1. Performance:
• Native apps are 60% faster in executing operations compared to hybrid apps.
• Hybrid apps experience 30% - 40% lag when loading complex graphics and
elements.
• Web apps efficiency drops by 50% when operating offline compared to native
apps.
3. Cost:
• Developing a native app costs between $40,000 - $300,000, depending on
complexity and the target platform.
• Developing a hybrid app is 30% - 50% cheaper than native apps, thanks to using
a single codebase for all platforms.
• Developing a Web apps is 70% - 80% cheaper than native apps, especially if it’s
based on an existing website.
4. Development Time:
• Native apps development takes 4 - 12 months, depending on complexity.
• Hybrid apps development takes 3 - 6 months, reducing development time by
30% - 40% compared to native apps.
• Web apps development takes only 1 - 3 months, making it the fastest option to
launch.
5. Market Share:
• 70% of the most-used apps globally are native apps, including Facebook,
Instagram, and WhatsApp.
• Around 40% of startups prefer hybrid apps initially to cut costs and expand
easily.
• Web apps popularity has grown by 200% in the last 5 years, especially with
Google and Microsoft supporting this app type.
These statistics provide a clear view of the strengths and weaknesses of each app
type, helping you make an informed decision when choosing the best option for your
project.
User Experience
100
80
Popularity (%)
60
40
20
0
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
The chart illustrates the evaluation of the popularity of the three main types of
applications over the past five years. It is evident that native apps have maintained
their dominance, hybrid apps have experienced significant growth, and web apps have
increased in popularity at a slower pace.
Native Apps
The popularity of native apps increased from 70% in 2019 to 80% in 2024. This
slight increase can be attributed to the continued demand for high performance
and superior user experience that native apps provide. Despite their higher
development costs and longer production time, native apps remain the preferred
choice for platforms requiring deep integration with device hardware, such as
gaming and financial applications.
Hybrid Apps
Have witnessed remarkable growth, with their popularity rising from 50% in 2019
to 73% in 2024. Several factors contribute to this growth, including:
• Significant improvements in hybrid frameworks like Flutter and React
Native, making their performance closer to that of native apps.
• Reduced development costs, as a single hybrid app can function across
multiple platforms, saving time and resources.
• Increased adoption by startups due to their lower costs compared to native
applications.
Web Apps
The popularity of web apps has increased from 40% in 2019 to 52% in 2024, but at
a slower rate compared to hybrid apps. This slow growth is due to several reasons,
including:
• Advances in progressive web apps improving the user experience to be
closer to native apps.
• Ongoing limitations, such as the need for a stable internet connection and
restricted access to device feature like the camera and sensors.
Web apps remain a preferred option for content-heavy platforms such as blogs and
e-commerce store.
3. Visual Studio:
Used for developing Xamarin and React Native applications. Supports multiple
languages, including C#, JavaScript, and python.
4. Flutter (Dart):
Can be used with Visual Studio Code or Android Studio with the flutter SDK.
Features hot reload, allowing instant updates without restarting the app.
1. General-Purpose IDEs:
These support multiple programming languages and are widely used across
different projects.
• Visual Studio (by Microsoft) → Supports C#, C++, Python, and more.
2. Language-Specific IDEs:
These are designed for a specific programming language.
• Xcode → For Swift and Objective-C (macOS & iOS development).
6. Cloud-Based IDEs:
These run entirely in the cloud, accessible via a browser.
• Replit → Supports many language, great for collaboration.
• GitHub Codespaces → Cloud-based VS Code.
• AWS Cloud9 → Integrated with AWS services for cloud-based development.
Languages
1. Java
One of the most well-known and established
programming languages, Java, created by Sun
Microsystems in 1995 and presently under
ownership of Oracle. Its "write once, run
anywhere" approach helped developers wishing to
create cross-platform apps choose it. Java has been
the pillar of Android development in mobile
technology since its launch in 2008. Particularly in
the Android ecosystem, its long-standing existence
and ongoing development make it quite pertinent
for the creation of mobile apps.
Key Features:
• Object-Oriented Programming: Java's object-oriented character lets developers produce
modular, reusable code, therefore facilitating management of big projects and
enhancement of software maintainability.
• Strong Memory Management: Java uses garbage collecting to automatically manage
memory, therefore helping to reduce memory leaks and improve program stability.
• Vast Library Support: Among the many libraries and frameworks Java offers are the Android
SDK, which offers pre-built components meant for quicker and more effective development.
Use Cases:
Driven by millions of applications on the Google Play Store, Java is the main language used in
Android development. Its dependability and fit with the Android SDK have made it the
preferred tool for creating scalable, feature-rich Android projects. Java has been used
extensively to create well-known apps such as Spotify, Twitter, and Airbnb, thereby highlighting
its capacity to manage demanding, high-performance applications.
Pros:
• Stability: Java is a dependable and stable alternative for mobile development thanks in
great part to its lengthy legacy and general acceptance.
• Mature Ecosystem: Java provides a developed environment with tools, libraries, and rich
documentation throughout decades of evolution, therefore streamlining the development
process.
Cons:
• Verbose Syntax: Java's verbose grammar calls for more lines of code to complete tasks that
could be simpler in other languages.
• Steeper Learning Curve for Beginners: For novice developers, Java's syntax and ideas like
object-oriented programming can be difficult to grasp and complicate fast mastery.
Particularly for those that give reliability and scalability top priority for their
applications, Java is still a strong and dependable option for Android development.
2. Kotlin
Introduced by JetBrains in 2011, Kotlin has quickly
become an Android developer's preferred
language. Officially supported by Google in 2017
as the preferred language for Android, Kotlin was
created to solve many of Java's constraints by
providing a more current, succinct, and expressive
means of developing Android apps. Kotlin's ability
to simplify coding techniques while preserving
complete interchange with Java has driven its
popularity in mobile development as it lets
developers embrace it without completely redoing
current code bases.
Key Features:
• Interoperability with Java: Kotlin is completely compatible with Java, hence developers may
mix Java and Kotlin code inside one project. This function makes it simple to include into
current Android projects as it lets the Java to Kotlin transition go from seamless.
• Concise and Expressive Syntax: Kotlin lowers boilerplate code so that developers may
create more with less lines of code. Its expressive and neat syntax helps to produce easily
understandable and maintained code.
Use Cases:
Supported by Google and generally embraced by big firms such Pinterest, Netflix, and Trello,
Kotlin is currently the official language for Android development. Both novice and seasoned
developers find it appealing as it may improve output while lowering the possibility of
mistakes, thereby enhancing their choice.
Pros:
• Modern Language Features: Modern language features include null safety, extension
functions, and coroutines, which enable developers to create safer and more effective
programs using Kotlin.
• Seamless Integration with Java: Easy to adopt, Kotlin may be included into current Java
programs without any significant rework.
Cons:
• Smaller Community Compared to Java: Kotlin's community and tools are still smaller than
Java, hence even if it is becoming more popular, obtaining support might prove difficult.
• New Developers May Struggle: Although Kotlin's syntax is simple, it presents ideas that
could be foreign to novices, therefore creating a higher learning curve.
For Android developers trying to raise output and code quality, Kotlin's
contemporary style and official support make it a strong choice.
3. Swift
Swift replaced Objective-C as Apple's current
programming language in 2014. Swift is the
language of choice for building apps for iOS,
macOS, watchOS, and tvOS due to its speed,
safety, and expressiveness. Swift lets developers
build rich, high-performance programs that
interface with Apple's hardware and software while
prioritizing performance and safety.
Key Features:
• Strongly Typed, Safe Programming: Swift is tightly typed, requiring stringent type-checking
at compilation time. This reduces runtime crashes by catching mistakes early in
development. Safety features like optionals assist control value absence and prevent null
pointer errors in Swift.
• Fast and Efficient Performance: Swift is designed for speed and efficiency. Swift apps can
take use of Apple devices' hardware since it compiles to native machine code. This speeds
up execution and improves usability.
Use Cases:
Swift is recommended for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS apps since it's utilized only for
Apple products. Swift has been used to build Lyft, LinkedIn, and Airbnb, proving its capacity to
manage complicated projects. Swift's compatibility with Apple's frameworks and APIs makes it
suitable for developing high-performance Apple apps.
Pros:
• Native iOS Development: Easy interaction with iOS and macOS, resulting in extremely
performant and responsive programs.
• Optimized Performance: For performance-critical apps, Swift's compilation to native
machine code speeds up app execution.
Cons:
• Limited to Apple Ecosystem: Swift cannot be used on Android or other platforms, restricting
its adaptability.
• Smaller Talent Pool: Swift is becoming more popular, but its developer pool is still smaller
compared to Java or JavaScript, which can make recruiting or cooperation difficult.
Swift is the top choice for iOS and other Apple app developers due to its
performance, safety, and ecosystem integration. However, its Apple-only use limits its
utility outside this environment.
Key Features:
• Cross-Platform Capability: React Native enables developers to build a single codebase for
iOS and Android. Cross-platform development saves time and money, making software
maintenance and updates easier.
• Reusability of Code Between Web and Mobile Apps: Sharing code between web and
mobile apps is a highlight of React Native. Developers may reuse their JavaScript and React
expertise to create a more cohesive development experience across platforms.
Use Cases:
Startups and IT heavyweights use React Native. Facebook, Instagram, and Airbnb use React
Native to build huge, high-performance apps. Startups and smaller teams who need to develop
and release products fast like React Native's flexibility and speed.
Pros:
• Faster Development Cycles: React Native speeds development by using a single codebase
for iOS and Android, providing faster iteration and time-to-market.
• Large Community: JavaScript is a popular programming language, and React Native has a
large community. This implies many developer resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries.
Cons:
• Performance Trade-Offs: React Native is faster to design, but it may not perform as well as
native apps, especially for resource-intensive activities like animations or sophisticated
computations.
• Complex Debugging: React Native developers must troubleshoot bugs in both JavaScript
and the native code it interacts with, making problem-solving more complicated.
React Native's ability to combine online and mobile development with JavaScript
appeals to both quick developers and cross-platform functionality seekers. This
mobile app development framework should be chosen cautiously due to
performance trade-offs and debugging issues.
Key Features:
• Hot Reload Feature: The hot reload functionality in Flutter is a notable feature that allows
developers to view the consequences of code changes nearly instantaneously. This
accelerates development by allowing fast testing and repetition, making issue fixes and user
interface refinements easier.
• Single Codebase for Android and iOS: Flutter lets developers build one codebase for
Android and iOS. Since there are no platform-specific codebases, development is faster and
simpler. The Flutter framework makes apps operate smoothly and look uniform across
devices.
Use Cases:
Many firms use Flutter to unify development without sacrificing performance or design.
Google Ads, Alibaba, and the NYT are Flutter applications. These examples demonstrate
Flutter's ability to handle basic and sophisticated apps and offer high-quality user experiences
across platforms.
Pros:
• Faster Development Cycles: React Native speeds development by using a single codebase
for iOS and Android, providing faster iteration and time-to-market.
• Large Community: JavaScript is a popular programming language, and React Native has a
large community. This implies many developer resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries.
Cons:
• Performance Trade-Offs: React Native is faster to design, but it may not perform as well as
native apps, especially for resource-intensive activities like animations or sophisticated
computations.
• Complex Debugging: React Native developers must troubleshoot bugs in both JavaScript
and the native code it interacts with, making problem-solving more complicated.
Many developers use Flutter because it swiftly creates appealing, performant apps.
However, its growing nature and smaller library environment should be considered
while choosing it for your mobile development project.
6. C# (with Xamarin)
Microsoft's flexible C# programming language is
employed in corporate settings. Xamarin, a cross-
platform mobile development framework, has
made C# a strong tool for creating Android, iOS,
and Windows apps. Xamarin, currently part of
the.NET platform, lets developers construct native
mobile apps using a single C# codebase, making it
appealing to Microsoft-integrated companies.
Key Features:
• Shared Codebase for Android, iOS, and Windows: Developers may use Xamarin to build a
single C# codebase for various platforms, including Android, iOS, and Windows. Shared
codebases minimize development time and ensure consistency across devices and OS
systems.
• Access to Native APIs: Despite being cross-platform, Xamarin offers complete access to
native APIs, enabling developers to use platform-specific features and achieve near-native
performance. This means Xamarin apps can match the user experience of native apps on
each platform.
Use Cases:
Xamarin is popular in enterprises that prioritize Microsoft ecosystem integration. Xamarin
has helped UPS, Alaska Airlines, and the World Bank construct sophisticated mobile apps for
their enterprise-level operations. Enterprises should use the framework because it supports
complicated business requirements while preserving code efficiency.
Pros:
• Strong Support for Enterprise-Level Apps: Xamarin is ideal for enterprise apps, especially
for Microsoft-based companies. Integration with Visual Studio and other Microsoft products
simplifies large project management and scaling.
• Extensive Tooling: Xamarin uses Microsoft's debugging, testing, and profiling tools to
expedite development and maintain code quality.
Cons:
• Larger App Size: Xamarin apps are bigger than native apps because they include libraries
and runtime components. Apps that need storage capacity may be affected.
• Potential for Performance Issues: Xamarin aspires for near-native speed, however apps
with sophisticated animations and graphics or significant optimization may experience
performance issues.
Key Features:
• Simplicity and Readability: Python's syntax is known for its clarity, allowing developers to
create code in fewer lines. Beginners and others who value simplicity of growth above
performance would like it.
• Cross-Platform Support: Kivy and BeeWare allow iOS, Android, and other cross-platform
software development. Kivy develops multitouch apps, whereas BeeWare provides a toolset
for mobile and desktop native user interfaces.
Use Cases:
Educational tools, experimental projects, and tiny apps use Python for mobile programming.
Python may be used to make small games, instructional programs, and prototypes. Its
simplicity allows students to explore mobile programming without learning more sophisticated
languages, making it popular in academic contexts.
Pros:
• Easy to Learn: Python is one of the easiest programming languages for beginners due to its
simple syntax. This accessibility helps novice mobile app developers get started quickly.
• Wide Range of Applications: Python is flexible for web development and scientific
computation. This makes it a suitable alternative for developers who wish to use one
language for mobile apps and other projects.
Cons:
• Not as Performant as Other Languages: Interpreted languages like Python perform slower
than compiled languages like Swift or Java. Mobile apps that need efficiency and
responsiveness may suffer from this.
• Limited Use in Mainstream Mobile Development: Python is underutilized in mobile app
development despite its flexibility. Kivy and BeeWare lack the ecosystem and community
support of more established mobile programming languages, which might restrict their
efficacy for bigger, more complicated applications.
Python with Kivy and BeeWare allows simple mobile app development, but
performance trade-offs and low uptake in mainstream mobile development make it
suitable for niche applications and education.