Critique Ang Bayan Muna Bago Ang Sarili
Critique Ang Bayan Muna Bago Ang Sarili
(an excerpt)
by Jaime Cardinal Sin, DD
at the Mass celebrating the 5th
Death Anniversary of Ninoy Aquino)
(1) Five years later, we might ask ourselves; has Ninoy’s dream been fulfilled? Have we succeeded in
building a new nation, by “transcending our petty selves,” by setting aside our differences by working
together in a spirit of true self-giving, loving our country first, above our own interest? Bayan muna,
bago ang sarili. It is a question we must ask ourselves, as we remember Ninoy’s gift.
(2) It has been said that the truest motto of our people is “K.K.K”. No, not Katipunan, shaping unity out
of our diversity. How we wish that were our authentic name! But rather:
Kanya-Kanya’ng Katwiran,
Kanya-Kanya’ng Kagustuhan,
Kanya-Kanya’ng Kabig (or worse)
Kanya-Kanya’ng Kurakot...
or whatever else each one “specializes” in!
(3) Cynics among us say that K.K.K is the definition of our national character, the predominant strain in
our national culture. It’s what we are when we are “most natural”, most ourselves. “Bayan muna, Bago
ang Sarili” is an abstract, non-operative ideal,good for speeches, good for posters, goo for classroom
rhetoric but not for real, not for real life. For real is K.K.K.
(4) Kanya-Kanyang Katwiran, Kanya-Kanyang kagustuhan. We all remember the three monkeys; See
no Evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. Sometimes one wonders, if it
has become a national pastime, to see and hear and speak nothing, but evil against our fellow-
citizens. Talk can be a great service in a free nation: Talk is space for free discussion, for intelligent
debate, the exchange of information and perception, the clash of views.
(5) Ninoy himself said: “We must criticize in order to be free, because we are free only when we
criticized.” We may not, at our own peril, forget that. But we must remind ourselves that criticism is not
an end in itself; it is not the absolute. It is meant to help us to become free, but if it becomes the all-
encompassing output of our days, a way of life... so it takes up most of our energy, most of our time,
when we begin to take delight in tearing down, demoralizing, destabilizing; when we are at each
other’s throats all day long, then we really are engaged in self-destruction, and the destruction of hope,
the creation of despair, especially among the poor who continue to suffer in our midst.
(6) There is a Latin saying: “Unicuique suum, non praevalebunt.” “Every man for himself: That’s the
formula for disaster.” When Ninoy spoke of “the quest for that elusive national unity which is imperative
for the nation’s survival”-he said “survival”. He meant “survival”. How can we survive, as a nation and
as a people, if we have made the name of our national game as anarchic free-for-all in a “basket of
crabs?”
(7) K.K.K also means, we are told, Kanya Kanyang Kabig, Kanya- Kanyang Kurakot. Surely I don’t
need to dwell on this theme this morning. For weeks, the papers, radios, TV, have shouted nothing
else. It is the talk of the marketplace. I myself have spoken, often enough, of the 40 big thieves left
behind in our midst, and many many smaller ones which might include . . . even ourselves? Who
among us did not re-echo the sentiments and the work of the beloved Chino Roces when he asked for
a renewed moral order in government and society? It is a problem which must be addressed, and
addressed vigorously and unrelentingly.
(8) I am sure this will be increasingly done by our president, by consistent personal example she has
set a pattern for others to follow. I know she is bent on pursuing the battle against corruption with ever
more forceful and energetic action. But we know, we know that she and those around her cannot do
this all by themselves. As citizens, we must go “into an action mode ourselves.” The task cannot be
done without us.
(9) We must begin, rather, where we can begin, with ourselves we must ask: What can we do about it?
What in our own heart, in our own attitudes, in our own practices, must be changed? What sacrifices
must we ourselves do to make a positive contribution of deeds, to put under control this chronic illness
in our society, and in our culture?
(10) If all we do is talk and talk, and throw dirt at each other-forgetting to mind the ship and its engines,
and steer it in mine-filled waters-why, we will still be taking and quarrelling when our ship goes down
into the sea!
(11) If everyone in this church this morning, in Ninoy’s memory, pledge before the Lord that for one
year, “Bayan Muna, Bago ang Sarili”, would really be made an operative guideline, could it not mark at
least a beginning? If for one year, just to get going, we would make the principle govern our deeds, our
conduct in society, would that not be smart already? How can we “dream the impossible dream” and
promise to follow the stars” if we have become too calloused to do even this?
Check your understanding of the text by completing the graphic organizer below.
1. Did the author use language that you understood? Why do you say so?
2. What critical approach did he use? Explain why you think that is the approach.
4. What you have read is an example of how one expresses opinions using one approach in criticism.
This can be a good model for you to study and follow.
EAPP Critical Approaches. Encircle the letter of your answer.
1. Which critical approach focuses on understanding ways gender roles are reflected
or contradicted by texts?
A. Reader-response B. Feminism
C. Historicism D. Marxist
2. Which critical approach focuses on ways texts reflect, reinforce, or challenge the
effects of class, power relations, and social roles?
A. Reader-response B. Feminism
C. Historicism D. Marxist
3. Which critical approach focuses on understanding texts by viewing texts in the
context of other texts?
A. Reader-response B. Feminism
C. Historicism D. Marxist
4. Which critical approach focuses on each reader's personal reactions to a text?
A. Reader-response B. Feminism
C. Historicism D. Marxist
5. Which critical approach focuses on "objectively" evaluating the text, identifying its
underlying form. It may study, for example, a text's use of imagery, metaphor, or
symbolism?
A. Reader-response B. Media Criticism
C. Historicism D. Formalism