Concept Maps Review
Concept Maps Review
Psychoanalytic Social-cognitive
Humanism
Coping Physiology
Stressor—leads to eustress or distress
Depends on appraisal Fat cells—30-40 million
Fight-or-flight—Walter Cannon Divide if too full, can’t get rid of
Problem-focused (address fat cells
Adrenal glands
stressor) Set-point/metabolism
* Epinephrine (quick response)
Emotion-focused (seeks support Fat cells—low metabolic rate
* Glucocorticoids (slow response)
from others) Metabolism slows when fat cells
General Adaptation Syndrome—Selye
Exercise are deprived, tries to maintain
Alarm—activation of sympathetic
Biofeedback fat level
nervous system
Meditation Genetics
Resistance—deal with/fight
Spiritual connection Adopted children’s weight not
Exhaustion—breakdown of immune
system (telomeres in DNA affected, correlated to adoptive parents
can’t replicate); hippocampus can’t Identical twins correlation +.72
make new memories as well Fraternal twins correlation +.32
Illness Conflict Chemical effect
Heart (Friedman & Rosenman study) Leptin in rats—when up, weight
Type A—anger, reactive vs. down
Type B—relaxed
Approach-approach Losing weight?
69% of heart attack victims were A
Win-win situation 2/3 of women, 1/3 of men trying
Immune system impaired
Avoidance-avoidance
* B lymphocytes (fight bacteria—
Lose-lose situation
formed in bone marrow)
Approach-avoidance
* T lymphocytes (formed in thymus,
One choice, pros and cons
fight viruses, cancers)
* Macrophages (―big eaters
Conditioning the immune system
(Ader & Cohen study)
* Sweetened water with immune
suppressing drug—created classi-
cally conditioned immune suppres-
sion
* Placebo effect in illness?
LEARNING
Associative learning
Associative learning - consequences of behavior Latent learning (Tolman)
- allows prediction (associate stimuli) - operant behavior - cognitive maps (demonstrate
- respondent behavior Thorndike’s Law of Effect learning after award is given)
Pavlov’s dogs (1904 Nobel prize) Skinner Intrinsic motivation (desire to do
* US (food) leads to: * Operant chamber (Skinner Box) something for its own sake)
UR (salivation to food) * Shaping - When rewards are given for activ-
* CS (bell) becomes associated with - Successive approximations ity that is intrinsically reward-
US, leads to: * Discrimination ing, enjoyment declines
* CR (salivation to bell) Reinforcement (overjustification effect)
Elements of classical conditioning: Positive reinforcement—pleasurable Extrinsic motivation (desire to do
Acquisition stimulus after a response (strengthens something for reward)
Extinction the response) - Should be recognition for a job
Spontaneous recovery Negative reinforcement—reduces or well done
Generalization removes a negative stimulus Biological predispositions
Discrimination (still strengthens the response) - Easier to condition behaviors that
Implications: * Primary reinforcers (water, food, match natural behavior
Rescorla’s research on predictability etc.) vs. secondary reinforcers Legacy of Skinnerian thinking
Garcia’s research of biological predis- (money, etc.) - Criticism of deterministic philoso-
positions * Schedules of reinforcement phy, dehumanization, loss of
* easier to condition food aversions Continuous (rapid learning) personal freedom
to taste rather than sight or sound Partial (intermittent) Observational learning (modeling)
* easiest to condition behaviors that - Ratio (certain # of behaviors) Mirror neurons (biological basis)
promote survival * Fixed (5 visits to restaurant = - promote empathy
Applications: free meal) Bandura’s Bobo doll study
Aversive conditioning—pairing a * Variable (slot machine) Child watches adult, mimics
negative stimulus with a desired - Interval (certain period of time) Increase of violence, aggression
stimulus can help kick bad habits * Fixed (ex. each day @ 3 p.m.) Media influence
Drug addicts sometimes have cravings * Variable (ex. shooting stars) Violent crimes—87% on TV,
related to environment Punishment 13% real life
Classical conditioning of immune re- Positive punishment (add bad thing) Violent action is correlated to
sponse (Ader & Cohen study) Negative punishment (take away good) viewing violence (media, video
Extinction can help cure phobias *Both create avoidance behaviors games) - leads to desensitiza-
(ex. lie—becomes neg. reinforced) tion
MEMORY
Freud’s analysis
Biological rhythms Manifest content vs. Tolerance/withdrawal
Circadian rhythm (25 hr cycle) Latent content Involves neuroadaptation
Light (superchiasmic nucleus) Information-processing theory Addiction
Pineal gland (near thalamus) Filing experience
Melatonin Synthesizing memory Depressants
Adenosine (sleep-inducing) Pruning connections Alcohol
Sleep stages Build neural pathways Reduces inhibitions
Prior to stage 1 (alpha waves) Activation-synthesis theory Impairs activity of frontal lobe
Stage 1 (theta waves) 5 min. Pons generates neural firing Disrupts formation of LTM
Hypnagogic sensations Lucid dreams Barbiturates (tranquilizers)
Stage 2 (K-complexes, sleep spindles) Conscious awareness of dream Reduce anxiety, mimic alcohol
Approx. 20 minutes state Opiates (endorphin agonists)
Stage 3 (<50% delta waves) Morphine, heroin, oxycontin
Stage 4 (>50% delta waves)
Stage 3 & 4—slow wave sleep Stimulants
Order of stages Hypnosis Amphetamines/meth
1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, REM, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, Cocaine—rush/crash
REM Ecstasy—also a hallucinogen
REM—paradoxical sleep Mesmer (18th century) Stimulates serotonin
Active brain, paralyzed body Susceptibility Interferes w/sleep, impairs
Benefits Creativity, desire influences memory, reduces immune re-
Memory consolidation Therapeutic capacity sponse
Concentration Posthypnotic suggestions
Mood Pain alleviation Hallucinogens
Moderates hunger/reduces obesity Selective attention? LSD—serotonin agonist
Improves immune response Theories: Marijuana—cannabinoid agonist
Disorders Social influence theory Disrupts memory formation
Insomnia (10-15% of adults) Emphasizes desire of subjects Reverse tolerance
Narcolepsy to do well
Sleep apnea Divided consciousness theory
Night terrors (stage 4) Emphasizes dissociation
Sleepwalking (stage 4) Hilgard’s ―hidden observer‖
MOTIVATION
Physiology of hunger Theories of motivation Physiology of sex
Humanistic 1950’s—deinstitutionalization
Antipsychotic medications (D2 antagonists):
Cognitive therapy Chlorpromazine (Thorazine) - pos. symptoms
Clozapine (Clozaril) - negative symptoms
Focus: boost self-actualization (Maslow) * Problem: tardive dyskinesia
Become more self-accepting Aaron Beck (cognitive triad)
Atypical antipsychotics (D2 & serotonin an-
Method: Albert Ellis (RET)
tagonists) - fewer side effects
Client-centered therapy Stress inoculation training (change in thinking
Antianxiety meds: Xanax, Valium, Ativan
- active listening (no judgment) patterns to stress)
(GABA agonists)
Reflect feelings of client Cognitive-behavioral therapy
Antidepressants: also for OCD, anxiety
- non-directive SSRI’s—Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, etc.
Therapist: genuineness, unconditional Mood stabilizers
positive regard, empathy Group/family therapy Lithium—bipolar
Goal: promote personal growth, personal Depakote—bipolar (originally for seizures)
responsibility Brain stimulation
Saves time/money ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)
Humanistic foundation rTMS (magnetic stimulation)
Often as effective as individual therapy Surgery: Lobotomy (Moniz)
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Attribution theory Aggression and conflict
Group behavior
Internal vs. external attributions Biology: genetics, amygdala, decreased fron-
* Fundamental attribution error tal lobe activity, testosterone levels
* Actor-observer bias Social facilitation vs. social inhibition Psychology
* Self-serving bias * related to Yerkes-Dodson Law * Frustration-aggression principle
* Modeling (observational learning)
Social loafing * Social scripts (mental tapes on how to act)
* Video games?
Deindividuation * Catharsis hypothesis (builds more anger)
Attitude change * loss of identity, others don’t know who you Conflict
are * Social traps
- pursue self-interest, everyone loses
Cognitive/affective components of atti- Group polarization * Enemy perceptions
tudes (attitude vs. opinion) * movement to more extreme positions - mirror-image perceptions
Action affecting attitudes
* Foot-in-the-door Groupthink (Janus)
* Door-in-the-face * influenced by desire for harmony
Persuasion Attraction and altruism
* Central route to persuasion Minority influence
* Peripheral route to persuasion * self-confidence, determination key
Role playing (Zimbardo prison study) Passionate love (two-factor theory)
Cognitive dissonance (Festinger) Prejudice (attitude) — leads to discrimination vs. companionate love (key is equity, self-
(behavior) disclosure)
* Social roots: social inequality, blame-the- * Physical attractiveness key
victim, in-group vs. out-group leading to * Similarity
Group influence in-group bias * Proximity (mere exposure effect)
* Emotional roots: Fear, anger (leads to Altruism
scapegoating) Bystander affect
Conformity (Asch study) * Cognitive roots: Categorization, availability * diffusion of responsibility
* chameleon effect heuristic, just-world phenomenon * pluralistic ignorance
* mood linkage (mimicry) * Jane Eliot study—children and stereotyping * Explained by social exchange theory
Normative social influence vs. Informa- - self-fulfilling prophecies * Reciprocity norm
tional social influence * Social responsibility norm
Obedience (Milgram’s study) Peacemaking, GRIT
*Superordinate goals