PPT
PPT
GOLDEN MEAN
The Golden Mean ethical theory was proposed by Aristotle.
According to this theory, the solution to a problem is found by
analyzing the reason and the logic. A “Mean value of solution”
which will be between the extremes of excess and deficiency.
For example, the solution to the problem of environment
pollution is neither by avoiding industrialization and civilization, nor
by neglecting the environment completely. A mean solution that will
work towards controlling the pollution and protecting the
environment will also help.
PROBLEM OF APPLICATION
The application of this theory varies from one person to another
with their powers of reasoning and the difficulty in applying the
theory to ethical problems.
WHAT IS GOLDEN MEAN
The Golden Mean virtue can be understood as the virtue of
reaching a proper balance between extremes in conduct, emotion,
desire and attitude. This theory phrased by Aristotle states that virtues
are tendencies to find the golden mean between the extremes of too
much (excess) and too little (deficiency) with regard to particular
aspects of our lives.
The most important virtue is practical wisdom, i.e., morally
good judgment, which enables one to discern the mean for all the
other virtues. There are internal goods such as products, activities and
experiences should never clash with the external goods such as
money, power self-esteem and prestige. The standards of excellence
enable internal goods to be achieved. The external goods when
extremely concerned, though by individuals or by organizations,
threaten the internal goods.
UTILITARIAN ETHICS
The Utilitarian ethics was proposed by John Stuart. According
to this theory, the happiness or pleasure of a greatest number of
people in the society is considered as the greatest good. According to
this philosophy, an action is morally right if its consequences lead to
happiness of peo ple and wrong if they lead to their unhappiness.
An example of this can be the removal of reservation system in
education and government jobs, which can really benefit the talented.
But this can have an impact on the rights of the minorities.
PROBLEM OF APPLICATION
Qualification of the benefits can be difficult.
WHAT ARE THESE ETHICS
Consider the cost-benefit analysis in engineering. A typical cost-
benefit analysis identifies the good and bad consequences of some
action or policy in a monetary aspect. It weighs the total good against
total bad and then compares the results to similar tallies of the
consequences of alternative actions or rules. This supports the idea of
maximizing benefits against cost.
There are two main types of Utilitarianism. They are −
ACT UTILITARIANISM
The Act Utilitarianism focuses on each situation and the
alternative actions possible in the situation. Act Utilitarianism states
that “A particular action is right if it is likely to produce the higher
level of good for the most people in a given situation, compared to
alternative choices that might be made.”
In accordance with this theory, the good done is only considered
but not the way how it is done. For example, looting the richer to feed
the poor, can satisfy and make a group of poor people, happy. But
looting is not a way of morality. Hence act-utilitarianism seems to
justify the wrong-doing.
RULE UTILITARIANISM
The Rule Utilitarianism states that “Right actions are those
required by rules that produce the higher level of good for the most
people.” We need to consider a set of rules, where they interact with
each other. This was developed to clear the problem that occurs with
act-utilitarianism.
Engineers with ethics should follow the rule-utilitarianism
considering the point, “Act as faithful agents or trustees of
employers”. So, engineers should abide by it even when an exception
might happen to be beneficial. Like in the above example, one should
seek the help of law and order to prove the guilt of richer and let see
that the poor get benefitted.
You are hanging out with a friend who isn’t very popular. You
run into other friends who invite you to hang with them, but
they do not want your friend to come.
Moral Dilemma
JUSTIFYING PROFESSIONAL
OBLIGATIONS AND IDEAS
Every professional is obligated both to acquire and to
maintain the expertise needed to undertake her professional
tasks, and every professional is obligated to undertake only those
tasks that are within her competence. Competence is probably the
most obvious category of professional obligation.
COMPUTER ETHICS
Computers with Internet raise a host of difficult moral issues,
many of them connected with basic moral concerns such as free
speech, privacy, respect for property, informed consent and harm. To
evaluate and deal with these issues, a new area of applied ethics called
Computer Ethics has come up. These ethics are related to all the
computer professionals such as programmers, analysts, operators,
designers, etc. along with the users.
The ten commandments of Computer Ethics, created in 1992 by
the Computer Ethics Institute consists of the following −
One should never use a computer −
To harm the people (anti-social activities)
To interfere with other’s work (illegal manipulations)
To snoop into other’s files (malware)
To steal a computer/data (hacking)
To bear false witness (manipulation and morphing)
To use/ copy a software you didn’t pay for (like illegal
downloads and usages)
To use or copy other’s software without compensations (illegal
pirated versions)
To use other’s intellectual output inappropriately (violating IPR)
Doing without thinking of social consequences of the program
being written (libeling)
Always use a computer ensuring consideration and respect
towards fellow beings.
However, these ethics are facing lax in today’s world. A very small
section of concerned individuals seems to be following these ethics. A
large section seems to be violating these ethics. With this, there is an
unprecedented increase in cybercrime.