wispnet000197
wispnet000197
net/publication/323352027
CITATIONS READS
4 1,771
4 authors:
4 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS
Kumaraguru College of Technology
5 PUBLICATIONS 11 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Allin Joe D on 25 February 2018.
16 present day communication systems as it provides support the main conclusions of this paper. 46
21 designed with low insertion loss [3]. The size, volume, and are appropriately arranged in parallel to each other i.e., it pro- 50
22 weight of filters can be decreased while keeping insertion loss vides good coupling and desired bandwidth compared to other 51
23 low for obtaining the desired performance [4]. filter configurations [13]. The structure of the parallel coupled 52
24 Filters are used to eliminate undesired frequencies and microstrip line bandpass filter is demonstrated in Fig. 1. 53
25 isolate the desired frequencies. Filters are classified into four The general structure of parallel coupled microstrip line 54
26 categories in terms of their frequency characteristics: lowpass, bandpass filter using chebyshev approach is designed in this 55
27 highpass, bandstop and bandpass [5–7]. Microstrip line filters paper. Larger gaps between strips are its main advantage. 56
28 are of compact size and easy to integrate with other com- III. D ESIGN P ROCEDURE 57
29 ponents on a single board. The different types of microstrip
30 line filters are coupled line, hairpin, step impedance and stub The design procedure for the dual band chebyshev parallel 58
31 impedance [8–11]. Parallel coupled line techniques are often coupled microstrip line bandpass filter is arranged as Step 1–9. 59
32 used to design bandpass filter because of its simple structure, Step 1: Define bandpass filter specifications. 60
33 easy fabrication process, and good performance. Step 2: Select the order of the filter. 61
34 Substrates used for fabrication of filters are RT/Duroid5880, Step 3: Calculate the bandwidth for the desired frequencies. 62
35 RO4003C, TMM4, RO6010, RO3010, and FR4. RO6010 is Step 4: Calculate the admittance interval Jn . 63
36 the best performing substrate with compact size but the cost Step 5: Determine even and odd mode impedances. 64
37 of RO6010 substrate is very high. The FR4 substrate is of low Step 6: Select the appropriate substrate for filter design. 65
38 cost and good performing substrate [12]. Step 7: Using LineCalc tool in ADS, calculate the width, 66
39 The organization of this paper is as follows. The next section length, and spacing between lines of the filter. 67
40 represents the explanation of the proposed structure of the Step 8: Use the width, length, and spacing between lines 68
41 bandpass filter. The Design Procedure of the bandpass filter values to design the coupled line filter. 69
42 was discussed in Section III. The Optimization of the bandpass Step 9: Obtain the layout design and output of the filter. 70
43 filter values using ADS to improve the efficiency is noted in In this paper, a dual band chebyshev parallel coupled 71
44 Section IV. Section V provides the Result and Discussion of microstrip line bandpass filter is designed for 2.4 GHz and 72
TABLE I TABLE III
D ESIGN S PECIFICATIONS OF BANDPASS F ILTER . E VEN AND O DD M ODE I MPEDANCE VALUES FOR 5 TH O RDER
C HEBYSHEV F ILTER .
Specification Value
Gn Jn Zoe Zoo
Order of filter, N 5
Center frequency, fc 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz 3.481 0.003874 61.5609 42.1909
Impedance, Z0 50 Ω 0.761 0.000802 52.0854 48.0754
Fractional band width, ∆ 0.1 4.538 0.000702 51.8166 48.3066
0.761 0.000702 51.8166 48.3066
3.481 0.000802 52.0854 48.0754
TABLE II 1.000 0.003874 61.5609 42.1909
R IPPLE FACTOR 20 log10 ε = 3.0 D B.
TABLE IV
N g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 FR4 S UBSTRATE S PECIFICATION .
1 1.995 1.000
2 3.101 0.533 5.809 Specification Value
3 3.348 0.711 3.348 1.000
4 3.438 0.748 4.347 0.592 5.809 Substrate thickness, H 1.6 mm
5 3.481 0.761 4.538 0.761 3.481 1.000 Dielectric constant, εr 4.600
Metal thickness 1.4 mil
TanD 0.001
86 ωo = ω1 ω2 (3) ate schematic circuit of dual band chebyshev parallel coupled 115
ω1 ω2 microstrip line bandpass filter. It provides the simulation 116
87 ∆= . (4) tools to design and evaluate radio frequency (RF) filter. The
88
ωo 117
evaluation parameters for the designed filter are return loss 118
89 The admittance interval Jn is calculated using the Eqs. (5), and insertion loss. Using the LineCalc tool the length, width, 119
90 (6) and (7). and spacing between lines of a coupled line are calculated 120
s
π∆ directly from Zoe and Zoo values. The manipulation of width, 121
91 Zo J 1 = (5) length, and Spacing between lines using LineCalc tool in ADS 122
2g1
is shown in Fig. 2. 123
∆π The parameters required for using LineCalc tool are 124
92 Zo J N = √ (6)
2 gN −1 gN H: Substrate thickness (1.6 mm). 125
s
π∆ εr : Substrate relative dielectric constant (4.6). 126
93 Zo JN +1 = . (7) Cond: Metal conductivity (5.8e7). 127
2gN gN +1
94
Hu: Upper ground plane to substrate. 128
95 The even and odd mode impedances, Zoe and Zoo for the spacing (3.9e+34 mil). 129
96 5th order chebyshev filter are calculated using the Eqs. (8) and T : Thickness of metal layer (1.4 mils). 130
2 lines (S) of a coupled line are obtained from LineCalc tool and
99 Zoo = Zo 1 − JZo + (JZo ) . (9) 134
100 are tabulated in Table V. Based on these values, a 5th order 135
101 The calculated even and odd mode impedance values for dual band chebyshev parallel coupled microstrip line bandpass 136
102 5th order chebyshev filter are tabulated in Table III. filter is generated using ADS. 137
Fig. 2. Manipulation of width, length, and spacing between lines using
LineCalc tool in ADS.
Fig. 5. Simulated S11 and S21 parameters of 5th order chebyshev parallel
TABLE V coupled microstrip line bandpass filter.
W IDTH , L ENGTH , AND S PACING B ETWEEN L INES OF A C OUPLED L INE .
Line W (mm) L (mm) S (mm) shown in Fig. 5. From the Simulated S11 and S21 graph, 149
1 1.39817 17.2341 0.896707 S11 values for both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequencies are over 150
2 2.52213 16.3823 2.230940 −40 dB i.e., the designed bandpass filter allows the frequency 151
3 3.60575 16.5302 2.519180 bands from 2.30 GHz to 2.60 GHz as one band and 4.90 GHz 152
4 2.4215 16.6738 2.519180
5 1.51642 17.234 2.230940 to 5.15 GHz as another band. The return loss and insertion 153
6 2.12867 17.0442 0.340455 loss values for 2.4 GHz are −40.046 dB and −0.884 dB 154
whereas the return loss and insertion loss values for 5 GHz 155
are −40.265 dB and −8.085 dB. The obtained return loss is 156
high and insertion loss is low for the ISM band applications. 157
chebyshev filter and 3 dB equal ripple responses that suits for 161
Fig. 3. Schematic of 5th order chebyshev parallel coupled microstrip line ISM band applications is implemented in ADS. The filter was 162
bandpass filter.
designed using FR4 substrate with the thickness of 1.6 mm and 163
bandpass filter for more than two bands using microstrip lines. 168
R EFERENCES 169
Fig. 4. Layout of 5th order chebyshev parallel coupled microstrip line
bandpass filter. [1] M. A. Mutalib, Z. Zakaria, N. A. Shairi, and W. Y. Sam, “Design of 170
microstrip bandpass filter with electronically tunable notch response,” 171
138 V. R ESULT AND D ISCUSSION in 26th Conference Radioelektronika, Apr. 2016, pp. 454–457. 172
[2] Kaida Xu, Yonghong Zhang, Yong Fan, William T. Joines, and Qing 173
139 The 5th order chebyshev parallel coupled microstrip line Huo Liu, “Microstrip multi-band band filters using a single improved 174
140 bandpass filter is designed using ADS with characteristic ring resonator,” in IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International 175
Symposium (APSURSI), 2013, pp. 794–795. 176
141 impedance, Zo as 50 Ω and its schematic is shown in Fig. 3. [3] Lap Kun Yeung and Ke–Li Wu, “A dual-band coupled-line balun filter,” 177
142 The schematic design is converted into Layout design by IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 55, 178
143 using the values of length, width, and space between the no. 11, 2007. 179
[4] Bahareh Rezaei, Mohammad Pooyan, and Towhid Zargar Ershadi, 180
144 coupled lines. Layout design is the software version of the “Using microstrip element in dual-band bandpass filter with parallel 181
145 fabricated result. Layout design of 5th order chebyshev parallel coupled-line and space mapping technique,” The Computing Science and 182
146 coupled microstrip line bandpass filter is represented in Fig. 4. Technology International Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 39–43, Sep. 2012. 183
[5] Daniel Maassen, Felix Rautschke, and Georg Boeck, “Design and 184
147 The simulated S11 and S21 parameters of the 5th order comparison of various coupled line Tx-filters for a Ku-band block upcon- 185
148 chebyshev parallel coupled microstrip line bandpass filter is verter,” in German Microwave Conference, (GeMiC), 2016, pp. 225–228. 186
187 [6] Aniket Gunjal, S. R. Gagare, and R. P. Labade, “Bandwidth en- for fifth generation wireless communication applications,” in IEEE 215
188 hancement in band pass filter (BPF) using microstrip couple lines International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP), 216
189 for WLAN (2.4 GHz) applications,” in IEEE International Conference Nov. 2015, pp. 1–4. 217
190 on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), [13] L. Tan, J. Jiang, and W. Liangmo, “Multirate processing technique for 218
191 Mar. 2016, pp. 3629–3632. obtaining integer and fractional-order derivatives of low-frequency sig- 219
192 [7] Jia Ni and Jiasheng Hong, “Compact varactor-tuned microstrip high- nals,” IEEE Transaction on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 63, 220
193 pass filter with a quasi–elliptic function response,” IEEE Transactions no. 4, pp. 904–912, Apr. 2014. 221
194 on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 3853–3859, [14] R. A. Rahim, S. I. S. Hassan, M. N. Junita, and N. A. M. Damrah, 222
195 Nov. 2013. “Microstrip dual-band bandpass filter for ISM band applications,” in 223
196 [8] Cem Benar, Ibrahim Abbas Tafida, Mehmet Polat Kündüz, and IEEE International Conference on Control Systems, Computing and 224
197 Taha Imeci, “Changing passband on microstrip hairpin band-pass fil- Engineering, Penang, Malaysia, 2015, pp. 281–286. 225
198 ter,” in IEEE/ACES International Conference on Wireless Information [15] A. Das and S. K. Das, Microwave engineering, 2nd ed., New Delhi, 226
199 Technology and Systems (ICWITS) and Applied Computational Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2009. 227
200 Electromagnetics (ACES), 2016, pp. 1–2. [16] David. M. Pozar, Microwave engineering, 4th ed., Singapore: John Wiley 228
201 [9] Yahui Wu, Ruwan Gajaweera, and Jeremy Everard, “Dual-band band- and Sons. Inc, 2012. 229
202 pass filter using coaxial stepped impedance resonators,” in IEEE [17] Shakhawat Parvez, Nazmus Sakib, Md. Nurunnabi Mollah, and Md. 230
203 International Conference for Students on Applied Engineering (ICSAE), Abdur Rashid, “Uniform high-Q factored 3:9 annular ring resonator 231
204 2016. in coupled-line bandpass filter: Design and applications,” in IEEE 232
205 [10] J. A. G. Malherbe and Tebogo Bopape, “Pseudo-elliptic bandpass filter 5th International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision 233
206 with stepped impedance stubs,” in IEEE 46th European Microwave (ICIEV), May 2016, pp. 1078–1082. 234
207 Conference (EuMC), 2016, pp. 457–460. [18] S. N. Taib, M. A. Othman, M. A. Mior Hamdan, N. Y. M. Yasin, 235
208 [11] Hussein Shaman, Ahmed AlAmoudi, and Sultan Almorqi, “Millimeter- T. S. M. Arshad, M. Z. A. Abd Aziz, N. Hassan, and A. Salleh, 236
209 wave ultra-wideband (UWB) bandpass filter (BPF) using microstrip par- “X Band parallel coupled-line with dumbbling DGS filter for radar 237
210 allel coupled lines,” in IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking applications,” in IEEE International Conference on Instrumentation, 238
211 Conference (WCNC), 2016, pp. 1–4. Communications, Information Technology, and Biomedical Engineering 239
212 [12] Nadera Najib Al-Areqi, Norhudah Seman, and Tharek Abdul Rahman, (ICICI-BME), Jan. 2014, pp. 94–99. 240
213 “Parallel-coupled line bandpass filter design using different substrates
214