Copy of hw_6_Time_Study_II_Sol
Copy of hw_6_Time_Study_II_Sol
College of Engineering
Department of Industrial Engineering
1. The continuous stopwatch timing method was used to obtain the observed times
for a worker-machine task. Only one cycle was timed. The data are recorded in
the table below.
b. Tstd = 2.01(1 + 0.15) + + Max {(3.6 (1 + 1.5) & 3.3 (1 + 0.3)} = 6.6015 min
d. Tobs = 2.01 / 1.25 + Max {(3.6 / 1.25) & 3.3} = 4.908 min
2. The snapback timing method in direct time study was used to obtain the times for
a worker-machine task. The recorded times are listed in the table below.
Element a b c d e f
Observed time (min) 0.14 0.25 0.18 0.45 0.2 0.62
3. For a worker-machine task, the continuous timing method was used to obtain the
times indicated in the table below.
Element a b c d e
Observed time (min) 0.3 0.65 1.65 1.9 2.5
0.3 0.35 1 1.25 0.6
b. Tstd = 1.25 (1 + 0.16) + Max {1.25 (1 + 0.16) & 1 * (1 + 0.16)} = 2.9 min
4. For a certain repetitive task, the snapback timing method was used to obtain the
average work element times and performance ratings listed in the table below.
Work element a b c d e
Observed time (min) 0.47 0.58 0.7 0.75 2.1
Performance rating 90% 80% 110% N/A 85%
c. Tobs-cycle = (1.244 / 1.3) + Max {(0.77 / 1.3) & 0.75} = 1.706923 min
Qact = 7.3 (60) / 1.706923 = 256.6012 256 parts
5. The work element times for a repetitive work cycle are listed in the table below,
as determined in a direct time study using the snapback timing method.
Work element a b c d
Observed time (min) 0.75 0.30 1.62 1.05