2023246Regression ASRM 2023
2023246Regression ASRM 2023
ASRM 2023-24.
Linear Regression Analysis Class Problems ( Data is from the Internet Google se
(a) Plot these data, and estimate the linear regression of sales o
(b) What effect would you expect a Rs. 100 increase in price to h
Regression
Residual
Total
Coefficients
Intercept
SALES
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
Observation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
from the Internet Google search 12 August 2023.) This is only for the internal usage.
Y
380 450 420 X-> SALES PRICE
6.5 4.5 5 SALES 1
PRICE -0.937137 1
ression Statistics
0.937137
0.878226
0.85793
0.280439
8
df SS MS F Significance F
1 3.403125 3.403125 43.27152 0.000592
6 0.471875 0.078646
7 3.875
Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
13.97812 1.273702 10.97441 3.401E-05 10.86149 17.09476 10.86149 17.09476
-0.020625 0.003135 -6.578109 0.000592 -0.028297 -0.012953 -0.028297 -0.012953
Predicted PRICE
Residuals
5.315625 0.184375
6.140625 -0.140625
6.759375 -0.259375
5.728125 0.271875
4.903125 0.096875
6.140625 0.359375
4.696875 -0.196875
5.315625 -0.315625
SALES Line Fit Plot
8
6
4 PRICE
PRICE
Predicted PRICE
2
0
340 360 380 400 420 440 460
SALES
Y = MX + C
Y= -0.02X + 13.97
On Friday, November 13, 1989, prices on the BSE Exchange fell
steeply; the Standard and Poors 500-share index was down 6.1%
on that day. The accompanying table shows the percentage losses
(y) of the twenty-five largest mutual funds on November 13, 1989
Also shown are the percentage gains (x), assuming reinvested
dividends and capital gains, for these same funds for 1989, throug
November 12.
y x y x y x
4.7 38 6.4 39.5 4.2 24.7
4.7 24.5 3.3 23.3 3.3 18.7
4 21.5 3.6 28 4.1 36.8
4.7 30.8 4.7 30.8 6 31.2
3 20.3 4.4 32.9 5.8 50.9
4.4 24 5.4 30.3 4.9 30.7
5 29.6 3 19.9 3.8 20.3
3.3 19.4 4.9 24.6
3.8 25.6 5.2 32.3
(a) Estimate the linear regression of November 13 losses on pre-November
Interpret the slope of the sample regression line.
SE Exchange fell
ex was down 6.1%
e percentage losses
November 13, 1989.
ming reinvested
ds for 1989, through
Change
In
Change
Mean
In
Employ
ee
Absenc
Unemplo e Rate
yment Due To
Own
Year Rate Illness
1 -0.2 0.2
2 -0.1 0.2
3 1.4 0.2
4 1 -0.4
5 -0.3 -0.1
6 -0.7 0.2
7 0.7 -0.1
8 2.9 -0.8
9 -0.8 0.2
10 -0.7 0.2
11 -1 0.2
(a) Estimate the linear regression of change in mean employee absence rate
(b) Interpret the estimated slope of the regression line.
ccompanying table were found for
nnual change in mean employee
wn illness.
mated standard deviation of the estimator of the slope of the population regression line was 0.2759.
ation regression line is 0 against the alternative that the true slope is positive, and interpret your resu
hesis that the slope of the population regression line is 1, and interpret your result.
eventy-nine quarterly observations, the estimated linear regression:
WEEKLY WEEKLY
SHELF SALES, Y SHELF SALES, Y
STORE SPACE, X (HUNDR STORE SPACE, X (HUNDR
(FEET) EDS OF (FEET) EDS OF
RS. S) RS. S)
1 5 1.6 7 15 2.3
2 5 2.2 8 15 2.7
3 5 1.4 9 15 2.8
4 10 1.9 10 20 2.6
5 10 2.4 11 20 2.9
6 10 2.6 12 20 3.1
f Rs. s) of pet food for stores with 8 feet of shelf space for pet food.
(a)-(d) with this value and compare the results,
manager allocate to pet food? Explain.