0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views

QAP-UTTAM

The document outlines the Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) for the 55TPH Boiler and 9.15 MW BP Turbine project for M/s. Laxmi Organic Industries Ltd. It details the inspection stages, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria for various components and processes involved in manufacturing, emphasizing the need for compliance with contractual obligations and customer oversight. Specific comments and requirements for manufacturing stages, including testing and documentation, are also provided.

Uploaded by

Wajeed Zairdi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views

QAP-UTTAM

The document outlines the Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) for the 55TPH Boiler and 9.15 MW BP Turbine project for M/s. Laxmi Organic Industries Ltd. It details the inspection stages, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria for various components and processes involved in manufacturing, emphasizing the need for compliance with contractual obligations and customer oversight. Specific comments and requirements for manufacturing stages, including testing and documentation, are also provided.

Uploaded by

Wajeed Zairdi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

VENDOR

Date: 21 January 2025


DOCUMENT SHEET

PROJECT TITLE 55TPH BOILER AND 9.15 MW BP TURBINE

CUSTOMER M/s. LAXMI ORGANIC INDUSTRIES LTD., JOLWA, DAHEJ, GUJARAT

EPC M/s. UTTAM ENERGY LIMITED, PUNE, MH, INDIA

M/s. EXOTRON THERMAL PVT. LTD., PUNE, MH, INDIA


CONSULTANT

VENDOR
QAP No. QAP/LOIL/NPP
DOCUMENT NO.

DOCUMENT
R1
REVISION NO.

VENDOR DOCUMENT REVIEW FEEDBACK


Permission to proceed does not constitute acceptance or approval of Design Detail, Calculations, Analysis, Test
Methods or Materials developed OR selected by Vendor, and does NOT relieve Vendor from FULL compliance
with Contractual Obligations.

Code 1 No Comments / Code 5


Approved For Information & Records
☐ ☐
Revise - Resubmit.
Code 2 Work may proceed,
 subject to incorporation
of comments

Code 3 Revise - Resubmit.


Work shall not Proceed

Code 4 Cancelled / Superseded

Discipline Mechanical
Equipment No.

DOCUMENT
PROJECT No. Unit No.
TYPE
Cat. No. Seq. No. Rev. No.

N03003 91-BLR
QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
QAP No. QAP/LOIL/NPP Manufacture:- Uttamenergy Ltd, Aurangabad

1. PROJECT DETAILS:

NAME OF PROJECT
M/s LAXMI ORGANIC INDUSTRIES LTD.
PROJECT NUMBER UE772

CUSTOMER
M/s LAXMI ORGANIC INDUSTRIES LTD.

INSPECTION --
AUTHORITY
Details- 1X55TPH, 110 Kg/cm2(a), 540±5°

2. LEGENDS

H- HOLD Engg: Design Dept of Uttamenergy Limited


W- WITNESS App. Drg.- Drawing approved by Client
A-Approval V- VENDOR
R- REVIEW WPQ- Welder Performance qualification

RW- Random Witness PQR- Procedure Qualification Record


IR - Inspection report WPS- Welding Procedure Specification
IA -Inspection Authority MTC- Material Test Certificate
PG- Pressure Gauge SOS- Scope of supply
M: Measurement VE: Verify

R 22.11.2024 Kiran Dnyaneshwar B.Pandey Sir Client/TPI


0 Deshmukh Pawar

Rev. Date Prepared By Reviewed By Approved By Approved By Remarks


No
QAP No. QAP/LOIL/NPP

QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN


Manufacture:- Uttamenergy Ltd, Aurangabad
3. QUALITY STAGES AND INSPECTION (BOILER STRUCTURE)

Check Control By

Acceptable
standard/Ref Format of Check
Sr. No Description documents Record by UEL
TPI LOIL
Characteristic Method Extent QA/
QC

Review of
1 QAP, Scope of R 100% Approved QAP QA H A A
Indication of supply Purchase
Review, d Order
Hold,
Witness
Points

2 Inspection of all Non-Pressure Parts (BOILER STRUCTURE, FFS, APH ALL DUCTINGS, HOPPERS, AHS)
WPS/
2.1 WPS/PQR/ Welding R 100% ASME PQ R QA R R R
WPQ Parameters SECT IX /WPQ

Raw material
Structures,
2.2 Transfer Verification / App.
Towers, Belt co‐relation of M 100% Drg./BOM IR QC H W W
Conveyor, MTC with
Hopper, material.
Bunker, Refer
Other Non Comments
Pressure
parts Items,
Machining
items.

Metal App. Layout


2.3 Preparation/ ‐ Dimension & M 100% Drg./BOM IR QC H R R
Sheet &Plate Visual
and Inspection.
Structures
sections
cutting/

2.4 Bending / Dimension M 100% App. Drg. IR QC H R R


Rolling &Visual
inspection

100% As per
2.5 Weld set ups. Alignment M 100% Drg. As
Orientation 100% per Drg. IR QC H W W
Dimensions As per
. Drg.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
QAP No. QAP/LOIL/NPP Manufacture:- Uttamenergy Ltd, Aurangabad

Check Control By
Check
Acceptable Format by UEL
Sr. Description Extent standard/R of QA/ TPI LOIL
No Characteristic Method ef Record QC
documents

‐ Weld size/ R 100 As per Drg/ Visual QC R R R


2.6 Welding. Dimensions / % Design code Inspection W
Distortions Report
‐ Visual

Over all dimensions


Final ‐ Visual inspection V/M 100 Specificatio Inspection W
2.7 Dimensions ‐ Tag no. Identification % n/ report QC/QA H W
-Joint Splices Approved
-Supports drg.

Blasting & -DFT M 100 As per Drg/ QC H W R


2.8 Painting ‐ Process Parameters % Design code Painting
-SA 2.5 as pr Report
approved Painting
Scheme

Documents ‐ Material Traceability


2.9 Verification Record with MTC R 100 QAP / QC/QA H R R
& ‐ Dimension Report. % Procedure --
Submission ‐ Assembly report
& Release ‐ final documentation
Note list.Refer Comments
-
2.10 Packing As per UEL Packing R 100 As per UEL R R
Procedure % Packing -- QA/QC R
Procedure W

Notes – 1--Complete QC Folder will be submitted after last item dispatch from shop
2--Painting & painting inspection for all fabricated components shall be as per painting scheme
approved for the project.
COMMENTS –

1—All Manufacturing Stages to be witnessed by Customer


2—All plates of Tension ad Compression Flanges and Connection material and plates above 40 mm thickness
shall be normalized and subjected to 100 % MPT.
3—RT or UT shall be performed for all Butt Joints above 32 mm thickness.
4—Ceiling Girders, Columns, Ducts and Hoppers, will be subject to Trial Assembly and match marks before
dispatch.
4—All Dampers shall be subject to Operational Test and results will be reviewed.
5—Gas tight Dampers shall be subject to shop leakage to demonstrate the guaranteed tightness and results
will be offered for Review.

You might also like