Module-1 -
Module-1 -
Theory of the Firm: Firm and Industry, Objectives of the firm, alternate objectives of
firm.
Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of
goods and services.
Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the
behavior of the economy as a whole (analyzes the decisions made by countries and
governments), and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses
(allocation of resources, and prices of goods and services, taxes, regulations and government
legislation.).
Economics studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about
how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on
assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or
utility.
Definition:
1. “Managerial economics is the study of allocation of resources available to a firm among the
activities of that unit” - Hynes.
2. “The integration of economic theory and business practice for the purpose of facilitating
decision making and forward planning by management. – Spencer and Seligman.
3. “Managerial economics is the application of economic principles and methodologies to the
decision making process within the firm or organization.”-Douglas.
4. “Managerial economics applies economic theory and methods to business and
administrative decision making.”- Pappas & Hirschey.
MACRO ECONOMICS:
A. The study of economic activity by looking at the economy as a whole.
B. Macroeconomics analyzes overall economic issues such as employment, inflation,
productivity, interest rates, the foreign trade deficit, and the federal budget deficit.
C. An example of macroeconomics is the study of U.S. employment.
MICROECONOMICS:
1. Microeconomics is the social science that studies the implications of incentives and
decisions, specifically about how those affect the utilization and distribution of resources.
2. Microeconomics shows how and why different goods have different values, how
individuals and businesses conduct and benefit from efficient production and exchange,
and how individual’s best coordinate and cooperate with one another.
3. Generally speaking, microeconomics provides a more complete and detailed
understanding than macroeconomics.
NATURE OF MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS:
1. Art and Science: Management theory requires a lot of critical and logical thinking and
analytical skills to make decisions or solve problems. Many economists also find it a
source of research, saying it includes applying different economic concepts, techniques
and methods to solve business problems.
2. Micro Economics: In managerial economics, managers typically deal with the problems
relevant to a single entity rather than the economy as a whole. It is therefore considered an
integral part of micro economics.
3. Uses Macro Economics: A corporation works in an external world, i.e. it serves the
consumer, which is an important part of the economy. For this purpose, it is important that
managers evaluate the various macro-economic factors such as market dynamics,
economic changes, government policies, etc., and their effect on the company.
Multidisciplinary: It uses many tools and principles that belong to different disciplines, such as
accounting, finance, statistics, mathematics, production, operational research, human resources,
marketing, etc.
4. Prescriptive/Normative Discipline: By introducing corrective steps it aims at achieving
the objective and solves specific issues or problems.
Managerial economics is concerned with the application of economic concepts and analysis to
the problem of formulating rational managerial decisions. There are four groups of problem in
both decision making and forward planning.
1. Demand Analysis and Forecasting:
⮚ A firm relies on converting inputs into outputs and generates revenue from them. A clear
and accurate estimation of demand ensures a continuous efficiency of the firm. Several
external factors like price, income, affect the demand that need to be analyzed.
⮚ upon analyzing these factors affecting the demand for a product, managers can decide on
the production. After estimating the current demands, manager’s move ahead to predict
future demands for the product. This is referred to as demand forecasting.
Among the 4Ps of marketing, Price finds an important place. For any firm, Pricing is a
very important aspect of Managerial Economics as a firm's revenue earnings largely
depend on its pricing policy. However, it is a bit challenging as other players are
competing in the same price segment.
When pricing a product is done, the costs of production are also taken into account.
Managerial Economics helps the management to go through all the analyses and then
price a product. In an oligopoly market condition, the knowledge of pricing a product
is essential.
4.Capital Management:
Every asset a business owns is known as its capital. Capital management thus
becomes an important practice.
Planning and control of capital expenditures is a basic executive function. It
involves the Equi-marginal principle.
The prime objective is to ensure the sustainable use of capital. This means that
funds should be kept at a bay when the managerial returns are less than in other
uses.
5. Profit Management:
A business firm is an organization designed with an intention to make profits and
profits reflect the success of a company. After all the analyses, it all rolls down to
profits.
To maximize profits a firm needs to manage certain things like pricing, cost
aspects, resource allocation, and long-run decisions. This would mean that the firm
should work from the very beginning, evaluate its investment decisions and frame
the best capital budgeting policies. Profit management is considered as a difficult
area of managerial economics.
OTHER:
For example, investing in new plants, how much to invest, sources of funds, etc.
Study of managerial economics essentially involves the analysis of certain
major subjects like:
⮚ Demand analysis and methods of forecasting
⮚ Cost analysis
⮚ Pricing theory and policies
⮚ Profit analysis with special reference to break-even point
⮚ Capital budgeting for investment decisions
⮚ The business firm and objectives
⮚ Competition.
⮚ Inflation and economic conditions.
MANAGERIAL ECONOMIST:
He analyses the internal operation of business and helps management in making better
decisions in regard to internal workings. Managerial economist through his analytical and
forecasting skills provides advice to managers for formulating policies regarding internal
operations of the business.
Economic Intelligence
A managerial economist analyzes various investment avenues and chooses the most
appropriate one. He studies and discovers new possible fields of business for earning
better returns.
Focuses On Earning Reasonable Profit
He assists management in earning a reasonable rate of profit on capital employed in
the business. Managerial economist monitors activities of organizations to check
whether all operations are running efficiently as per the plans and policies.
A managerial economist maintains better relations with all internal and external
individuals connected with the business. It is his duty to develop a peaceful and
cooperative environment within the organization and aims to reduce any opposition
taking place.
• Existence – why do firms emerge and exist, why are not all transactions in the economy
mediated over the market?
• Which of their transactions are performed internally and which are negotiated in the
market?
• Organization – why are firms structured in such a specific way? What is the interplay of
formal and informal relationships?
• Heterogeneity of firm actions/performances – what drives different actions and performances
of firms?
1. Profit maximization: Considering any business that exists, they are usually concerned
with maximizing profit. Higher profit means:
2. Sales Maximization: Firms often seek to increase their market share, even if it means less
profit. This could occur for various reasons:
Increased market share increases monopoly power and may enable the firm to put up
prices and make more profit in the long run.
Managers prefer to work for bigger companies as it leads to greater prestige and higher
salaries. Increasing market share may force rivals out of business. E.g. the growth of
supermarkets has led to the demise of many local shops. Some firms may actually
engage in predatory pricing which involves making a loss to force a rival out of
business.
3. Utility maximization: It means “that managers get satisfaction from using some of the
firm's potential profits for unnecessary spending on items from which they personally
benefit.” To pursue his goal of utility maximization, the manager directs the firm's
resources many ways.
4. Increase Market Share/ Market Dominance: This is similar to sales maximization and
may involve mergers and takeovers. With this objective, the firm may be willing to make
lower levels of profit in order to increase in size and gain more market share. More market
share increases its monopoly power and ability to be a price setter.
5. Social Concern: A firm may incur extra expense to choose products which don’t harm the
environment or products not tested on animals. Alternatively, firms may be concerned about
local community / charitable concerns. Some firms may adopt social/environmental concerns as
part of their branding. This can ultimately help profitability as the brand becomes more
attractive to consumers. Some firms may adopt social/environmental concerns on principal
alone – even if it does little to improve sales/brand image.
6. Profit Satisficing: Profit satisficing is a situation where there is a separation of ownership and
control. As a result, the owners are likely to have different objectives to the managers and
workers.
7. Co-operatives: Co-operatives may have completely different objectives to a typical business.
A cooperative is run to maximize the welfare of all stakeholders – especially workers. Any profit
the cooperative makes will be shared amongst all members.
1. If the sales of a firm are declining then the banks, creditors and the capital market are not
prepared to provide finance to the firm anymore.
2. Its own distributors and dealers might stop showing interest on the firm’s product in
future. 3. Consumers might not buy its product because of its unpopularity and there is a
more chance of competitors acquiring the consumers.
4. Firm reduces its managerial and other staff with fall in sales.
5. But if firm’s sales are large, there are economies of scale and the firm expands and
earns large profits. 6. Salaries of workers and management also depend to a large extent
on more sales and the firm gives them bonus and other facilities.
Conclusion: This theory states that the sales maximization is to increase the total
revenue by money where, Sales can increase up to the point of profit maximization
where the marginal cost equals marginal revenue. If sales are increased beyond this
point money sales may increase at the expense of profits. If sales are increased beyond
this point money sales may increase at the expense of profits.
The Growth itself depends on two factors: First, the rate of growth of demand for the
firm’s product - GD; and second, the rate of growth of capital supply – GS.
All major variables such as profits, sales and costs are assumed to
• According to Marris, there are two different utility functions for the manager and the owner
of the firm. The utility function of the manager consists of his emoluments, status, power,
job security, etc. On the other hand, the utility function of the owner includes profits,
capital, output, market share, etc.
• The firm may grow in size through the creation of new products which create new demands.
Marris calls it differentiated diversification. The introduction of new products depends
upon the rate of diversification, advertising expenses, R&D expenditures, etc.
• Marris establishes the relationship between growth and profits on the demand side through
diversification into new products. The links between growth and profits are different at
different levels of growth. In this growth-profits relationship, growth determines profits.
When the rate of growth of the firm is low, the relationship is a positive one.
• As new products are introduced, the firm expands (grows) and profits increase. With the
further increase in the growth rate due to greater diversification into new products, the
growth-profits relationship becomes negative. This is because there is the managerial
constraint which sets a limit on the rate of managerial growth that restricts the growth of
the firm.
The firms’ managerial ability to cope with a great number of changes at once is limited.
It is not possible to develop a larger management team for the development and
marketing of new products.
• The higher rate of diversification requires higher expenditures on advertising and R &D. As
a result, beyond a certain growth rate, the higher growth rate leads to a lower rate of profit.
This is illustrated in Figure 4 where the GD curve first rises, reaches the highest point M
and then starts falling.
• The growth-supply curve will be very steep as shown by GS1 curve. The firm’s equilibrium
will be at point L where the GS1 curve intersects the GD curve. This is again not the
optimal equilibrium point of the firm because here the growth rate is low and profits are
below the maximum level.
• Larger retained profits are required by managers to invest larger funds for the growth of the
firm. These raise the retention ratio which, in turn, leads to higher profits and higher
growth rates until point M of maximum profits is reached.
• This is again not the optimum equilibrium point of the firm because the managers feel that
this combination of higher growth rate and higher profits is approved by the shareholders
and there is no threat to their job security. They will, therefore, be encouraged to raise the
retention ratio further, invest more funds, expand and increase the growth rate of the firm.
• As a result, the growth-supply curve will become flatter and take the shape of GS3 curve as
in the figure where it intersects the DS curve at point E. At this point, distributed profits to
shareholders fall. But they are adequate to satisfy the shareholders so that there is no fear
of fall in the prices of shares and of the threat of take-overs. There is also job security for
managers.
• Thus point E is the optimal equilibrium point of the firm. If the managers adopt a higher
retention ratio than this, the distributed profits will fall further and the shareholders will not
be satisfied which will endanger the job security of managers. The existing shareholders
may decide to replace the managers. If the distribution of low profits to shareholders brings
a falls in the market prices of shares, it may lead to take-over of the firm.
• Criticism:
⚫ Marris assumes a given price structure for the firms. He, therefore, does not explain how
prices of products are determined in the market. This is a serious weakness of his model.
⚫ . Another defect of this model is that it ignores the problem of oligopolistic interdependence
of firms in non-collusive market.
⚫ The assumption that all major variables such as profits, sales and costs increase at the same
rate is highly unrealistic.
⚫ It is also doubtful that a firm would continue to grow at a constant rate, as assumed by
Marris. The firm might grow faster now and slowly later on.
⚫ Marris lumps together advertising and R&D expenses in his model. This is a serious
shortcoming of the model because the effectiveness of these two variables is not the same
in any given period.
Conclusion:
• Thus the manager of a firm aims at maximizing his utility, and his utility depends upon the
rate of growth of the firm. Though promoting the growth of the firm is the main aim of the
manager, yet he is also motivated by his job security. The manager’s job security depends
upon the satisfaction of shareholders who are concerned to keep the firm’s share prices and
dividends as high as possible.
• Thus the manager aims at maximizing the rate of growth of the firm and the shareholders
(owners) aim at maximizing their profits in the form of dividends and share prices. Marris
analyses the means by which the firm tries to achieve its growth-maximization goal.
∙ Oliver E. Williamson found (1964) that profit maximization would not be the objective of
the managers of a company.
∙ This theory assumes that utility maximization is a manager’s sole objective. However it is
only in a corporate form of business organization that a self-interest seeking manager
Maximize his/her own utility, since there exists a separation of ownership and control.
∙ The managers can use their ‘discretion’ to frame and execute policies which would
maximize their own utilities rather than maximizing the shareholders’ utilities.
∙ This is essentially the principal–agent problem. This could however threaten their job security,
if a Minimum level of profit is not attained by the firm to distribute among the shareholders. ∙
Utility function or "expense preference" of a manager can be given by:
[8]
U=U(S,M,Id)
S denotes the “monetary expenditure on the staff” (not only the manager's salary
and other forms of monetary compensation received by him from the business
firm)
shareholders.
• Fig 1. Shows the various levels of utility (U1, U2, U3) derived by the manager by combining
different amounts of discretionary profits and staff expenditure. Higher the indifference
curve, higher is the level of utility derived by the manager. Hence the manager would try
to be on the highest level of indifference curve possible given the constraints. Staff
expenditure is plotted on the x-axis and discretionary profits on the y axis.
• The discretionary profit in this simplified model is equal to the discretionary investment.
The indifference curves are downward sloping and convex to the origin. This shows
diminishing marginal rate of substitution of staff expenditure for discretionary profits. The
curves are asymptotic in nature which implies that at any point of time and under any given
circumstance the manager will choose positive amounts of both discretionary profits and
staff expenditure
⚫
Assuming that the firm is producing an optimum level of output and the market environment
is given, the discretionary profits curve is generated, shown in Fig 2. It gives the
relationship between staff expenditure and discretionary profits.
⚫
It can be seen from the figure that profit will be positive in the region between the points
B and ⚫ Initially with increase in profits, the staff expenditure the discretionary profits also
increase, but this is only till the point Πmax that is, till S level of staff expenditure.
Beyond this if staff expenditure is increased due to increase in output, and then a fall in the
discretionary profits is noticed.
⚫
Staff expenditure of less than B and more than C is not feasible as it wouldn't
satisfy the Minimum profit constraint and would in turn threaten the job
security of managers.
• To find the equilibrium in the model, Fig 1. Is superimposed on Fig 2.
• The equilibrium point is the point where the discretionary profit curve is tangent to the
highest possible indifference curve of the manager, which is point E in Fig 3. Staying at
the highest profit point would require the manager to be at a lower indifference curve U2.
• In this case the highest attainable level of utility is U3. At equilibrium, the level of profits
would be lower but staff expenditure S* is higher than the staff expenditure made at the
maximum profit point. • As indifference curve is downward sloping, the equilibrium point
would always be on the right of the maximum profit point. Thus the model shows the
higher preference of managers for staff expenditure as compared to the
discretionary investments
Arguments:
⚫
In the Williamson theory or model argues that managers have discretion in pursuing policies
which maximize their own utility rather than attempting the maximization of profits which
maximizes the utility of owner and shareholders.
⚫
Profit acts as a constraint to this managerial behavior in that the financial market and the
This model does not clarify the basis of the derivation of his feasibility curve. In particular,
he fails to indicate the constraint in the profit-staff relation, as shown by the shape of the
feasibility curve. ⚫ it lumps together staff and manager’s emoluments in the utility curve.
This mixing up of non Pecuniary and pecuniary benefits of the manager make the utility
function ambiguous.
This model does not deal with oligopolistic interdependence and of oligopolistic rivalry.
Arguments:
• In the Williamson theory or model argues that managers have discretion in pursuing policies
which maximize their own utility rather than attempting the maximization of profits which
maximizes the utility of owner and shareholders.
• Profit acts as a constraint to this managerial behavior in that the financial market and the
shareholders require a minimum profit to be paid out in the form of dividends; otherwise
the job security of managers is end angered.
• In this theory Williamson considered the two important factors namely, staff expenditures on
emoluments (slack payments), and funds available for discretionary investment give to
managers a positive satisfaction (utility) because these expenditures are a source of
security and reflect the power, status, prestige and professional achievement of managers.
• Being the head of a large staff is a symbol of power, status and prestige, as well as a
measure of Professional success, because a progressive and increasing staff implies
successful expansion of the particular activity for which a manager is responsible within
firm.
From the above graph, taking Discretion Profit in Y-axis and Staff Expenditure in X-
axis, where U1, U2, U3 shows the utility level of the managers with facilities provided
by the firm. With the different combination of factors the level of utility changes.
Hence the profit of the firm relies on the ideal combination of factors such as
Discretion Profit and Staff Expenditure.
Criticism:
1. This model does not clarify the basis of the derivation of his feasibility curve. In
particular, he fails to indicate the constraint in the profit-staff relation, as shown by the
shape of the feasibility curve. 2. It lumps together staff and manager’s emoluments in the
utility curve. This mixing up of non- pecuniary and pecuniary benefits of the manager
makes the utility function ambiguous.
3. This model does not deal with oligopolistic interdependence and of oligopolistic rivalry.
QUESTION BANK: