PDF Chiral Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis Chromatographic Science 1st Edition Ann Van Eeckhaut Download
PDF Chiral Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis Chromatographic Science 1st Edition Ann Van Eeckhaut Download
https://ebookfinal.com/download/capillary-electrophoresis-methods-and-
protocols-1st-edition-andreas-zemann/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/chiral-separations-methods-and-
protocols-1st-edition-gerald-gubitz/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/affinity-capillary-electrophoresis-in-
pharmaceutics-and-biopharmaceutics-1st-edition-reinhard-h-h-neubert/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/handbook-of-capillary-and-microchip-
electrophoresis-and-associated-microtechniques-3rd-edition-james-p-
landers/
Electrophoresis in Practice A Guide to Methods and
Applications of DNA and Protein Separations 4th, Revised
and Updated Edition Edition Reiner Westermeier (Author)
https://ebookfinal.com/download/electrophoresis-in-practice-a-guide-
to-methods-and-applications-of-dna-and-protein-separations-4th-
revised-and-updated-edition-edition-reiner-westermeier-author/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/bioanalytical-separations-
volume-4-handbook-of-analytical-separations-1st-edition-ian-d-wilson/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/chiral-photochemistry-1st-edition-
yoshihisa-inoue/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/chiral-analysis-1st-edition-kenneth-w-
busch/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-cognitive-science-of-religion-1st-
edition-james-a-van-slyke/
Chiral Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis
Chromatographic Science 1st Edition Ann Van Eeckhaut
Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Ann Van Eeckhaut, Yvette Michotte
ISBN(s): 9781420069334, 1420069330
Edition: 1
File Details: PDF, 7.05 MB
Year: 2009
Language: english
Chiral Separations by
Capillary Electrophoresis
CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCIENCE SERIES
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts
have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume
responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers
have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to
copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has
not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmit-
ted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented,
including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system,
without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.
com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood
Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and
registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC,
a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
RS429.C484 2009
541’.372--dc22 2009031932
ix
x Contents
Yvette Michotte
Ann Van Eeckhaut
xi
Editors
Yvette Michotte is the head of the Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and
Drug Analysis of the School of Pharmacy at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
She is also heading the research group of experimental neuropharmacology.
Her main research topics are the development and validation of analytical methods
for the quantification of compounds for label claim control of drug substances and
drug products, and for the quantification of drugs, metabolites, and endogenous com-
pounds in biological matrices. One of her principal topics is the analysis of drugs,
neurotransmitters, and neuropeptides in microdialysates from in vivo neuropharma-
cological experiments. The analytical techniques used are micro- and nano-liquid
chromatography, coupled to amperometric and mass spectrometric detection
(LC–MS/MS), and capillary electrophoresis.
xiii
Contributors
Zeineb Aturki Vincenzo Cucinotta
Institute of Chemical Methodologies Department of Chemical Sciences
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche University of Catania
Monterotondo Scalo, Italy Catania, Italy
xv
xvi Contributors
Maria A. Schwarz
Department of Chemistry Radim Vespalec
University of Basel Brno, Czech Republic
Basel, Switzerland
and Jean-Luc Veuthey
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Solvias AG University of Geneva
Basel, Switzerland University of Lausanne
Geneva, Switzerland
Anne-Catherine Servais
Department of Analytical
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Markéta Vlčková
Institute of Pharmacy Department of Chemistry
University of Liège University of Basel
Liège, Belgium Basel, Switzerland
1 Pharmacological
Importance of Chiral
Separations
CONTENTS
1.1 General Terminology of Isomerism ................................................................2
1.2 Chirality ..........................................................................................................3
1.3 Stereoselectivity in Pharmacodynamics .........................................................5
1.4 Stereoselectivity in Pharmacokinetics ............................................................7
1.4.1 Absorption..........................................................................................8
1.4.2 Distribution ........................................................................................8
1.4.3 Metabolization ...................................................................................9
1.4.3.1 Substrate Stereoselectivity .................................................9
1.4.3.2 Product Stereoselectivity .................................................. 10
1.4.3.3 Substrate–Product Stereoselectivity ................................. 11
1.4.4 Renal Excretion ................................................................................ 12
1.5 Interspecies Differences ................................................................................ 12
1.6 Patient-Specific Factors ................................................................................. 12
1.6.1 Age ................................................................................................... 12
1.6.2 Gender .............................................................................................. 13
1.6.3 Genetic Factors ................................................................................ 13
1.6.4 Disease State .................................................................................... 14
1.7 Drug-Related Factors .................................................................................... 14
1.7.1 Input Rate ......................................................................................... 14
1.7.2 Interactions....................................................................................... 15
1.8 Single Enantiomer versus Racemate—“Chiral Switches”............................ 15
1.9 The Need for Analytical Tools ...................................................................... 17
1.10 Introduction to Capillary Electrophoresis ..................................................... 17
References ................................................................................................................ 18
1
2 Chiral Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis
Isomers
Same stoichiometric molecular formula,
but different constitution or arrangement
of their atoms in space.
No Yes
CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2OH CH -CH2OH
CH3
Mirror images?
1-propanol 2-propanol
No Yes
Diastereoisomers Enantiomers
Stereoisomers that are not related as Nonsuperimposable mirror images
mirror images of each other
Cl Cl H Cl CH3 Br
C C C C H C Br H C CH3
H H Cl H
C2H5 C2H5
cis-1,2- trans-1,2-
dichloroethylene dichloroethylene R-2-bromobutane S-2-bromobutane
O O H H
HO H H HO
N N
H2N H2N
H CH3 Diastereomers H3C H
HO HO
(R,S)-labetalol (R,R)-labetalol
Enantiomers Enantiomers
O Diastereomers O H H
H OH H HO
N N
H2N H2N
H3C H H CH3
HO HO
(S,R)-labetalol (S,S)-labetalol
1.2 CHIRALITY
The term chirality originates from the Greek word “χειρ,” meaning hand, and it
describes drugs which have the property of molecular asymmetry and therefore exist
as a pair of nonsuperimposable mirror images. In 1848, Louis Pasteur initiated the
study of the physical and chemical properties of asymmetric molecules. He discov-
ered that tartaric acid exists as two crystalline salts, which rotate the plane of polar-
ized light in opposite directions [4].
The chiral center is usually, but not obligatory, a carbon atom. A chiral center is
then formed when four different groups are linked to the same carbon atom. Less
commonly, other atoms including phosphor, sulfur, and nitrogen may also form a
chiral center. A racemate is an equimolar mixture of a pair of enantiomers. It does
not show optical activity. Both enantiomers, on the other hand, have the ability to
rotate the plane of polarized light. Both with the same number of degrees, although in
4 Chiral Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis
opposite direction. The enantiomer that rotates the plane of polarized light clockwise
is called dextrorotatory and this is indicated by a d- or (+)-sign before the chemical
name. The enantiomer that rotates the plane counterclockwise is termed levorotatory
and is designated by the prefix l- or (−). This method of designation is based upon a
physical property of the molecule and it does not provide any information concern-
ing the absolute configuration or three-dimensional arrangement of atoms around
the chiral center [5,6]. Since both the direction and magnitude of rotation may vary
with experimental conditions, like for example the solvent, one should look carefully
at using the direction of rotation as a stereochemical descriptor [5].
Currently, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC)
recommends the Cahn–Ingold–Prelog method of designation. This model uses the
absolute structural configuration of the enantiomers. It does not relate to the direc-
tion of rotation of polarized light. The enantiomers are classified R (rectus) or S
(sinister), according to the sequence-rule procedure [7,8]. In this sequence rule,
the atoms attached to a chiral center are assigned priorities according to some
rules. The most important are the atomic number and mass. In Figure 1.3, a car-
bon atom is depicted to which four different ligands (a, b, c, d where a > b >c >d)
are attached. If the left molecule is viewed remote from the group with the lowest
priority d, the path from a to b to c follows a clockwise direction. This molecule is
assigned as the R configuration. In the molecule, on the right-hand side, the path
from a to b to c traces a counterclockwise direction. This molecule is assigned as
the S-enantiomer.
A third way of designation, the d/l convention, is commonly used by biochemists
to describe the stereochemical configuration of sugars and amino acids. This des-
ignation should not be confused with the d/l nomenclature. Sugars are designated
as d or l corresponding to the configuration of the chiral carbon farthest from the
carbonyl group, using d- and l-glyceraldehyde as reference molecules. In the case
of α-amino acids, the molecule is viewed along the C–H axis between the hydrogen
and the asymmetric carbon atom. If the clockwise order of the other three groups is
–COOH, –R, –NH2, then the amino acid belongs to the d-series; otherwise it belongs
to the l-series.
a a
d b d c
c b
R S
FIGURE 1.3 The R/S convention. A carbon atom is depicted to which four different ligands
a, b, c, d are attached, where a > b > c > d. When the left molecule is viewed remote from the
group with the lowest priority d, the path from a to b to c follows a clockwise direction. This
molecule is assigned the R configuration. In the molecule on the right, the path from a over b
to c traces a counterclockwise direction. This molecule is assigned the S-enantiomer.
Pharmacological Importance of Chiral Separations 5
responsible for toxic effects. Thus, the racemate can contain up to 50% of impu-
rity or ballast. Examples are escitalopram and levodopa. Escitalopram is the active
S-enantiomer of citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. It is approxi-
mately 100 times more potent as reuptake inhibitor than its R-enantiomer [14–17].
While the R-enantiomer is practically devoid of uptake inhibition potency, it does
appear to interact with histamine receptors. Therefore, the single enantiomer drug
escitalopram will be less sedating than the racemate [16]. In addition, it has been
shown that R-citalopram counteracts the binding of escitalopram to the allosteric
site of the serotonin transporter [18]. Serious side effects limited the use of racemic
dopa for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. These adverse effects included nau-
sea, vomiting, anorexia, involuntary movements, and granulocytopenia. The use of
levodopa instead of the racemate was found to halve the required dose, to reduce
toxicity, and to improve the motor function. The occurrence of granulocytopenia was
related to the dextrorotary enantiomer [3].
Secondly, the two enantiomers can have almost identical qualitative and quan-
titative pharmacological activity. The enantiomers of promethazine, for example,
have nearly identical antihistaminic properties and toxicity [5,19,20]. Similarly, both
enantiomers of flecainide and propafenone have equivalent antiarrhythmic potency
[5,20,21].
Thirdly, the enantiomers can possess similar pharmacological properties;
however, they can differ in potency. Most chiral drugs belong to this category.
Examples of this class of chiral drugs are warfarin, verapamil, levocetirizine,
and (R,R)-methylphenidate. S-warfarin has a five times larger anticoagulant
potency than its antipode R-warfarin [15,22,23]. S-verapamil is approximately
20 times more potent than its R-enantiomer with regard to negative dromotropic
effects on atrioventricular node conduction [24]. Levocetirizine has an approxi-
mately 30-fold higher affi nity for human H1-receptor than dextrocetirizine [25].
(R,R)-methylphenidate, used for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity
disorder, is approximately 10 times more potent than (S,S)-methylphenidate in
the inhibition of dopamine and noradrenaline from striatal and hypothalamic
synaptosomes respectively [26].
Fourthly, enantiomers can have qualitatively different pharmacological activities.
For example, dextropropoxyphene is used as an analgesic while levopropoxyphene
has antitussive properties. Another example is the mixed adrenoreceptor blocker
labetalol. The (S,R)-isomer has α-blocking effects, while the β-blocking activities
are due to the (R,R)-isomer [19,27].
According to these pharmacodynamic differences seen between enantiomers,
in several cases the use of a single enantiomer instead of the racemate could be
suggested. However, it is not always clear-cut as seen in the example of ibuprofen.
Although R-ibuprofen is not active, it is the precursor of the active S-enantiomer
via a unidirectional metabolic chiral inversion pathway (Figure 1.4). R-ibuprofen
is metabolized to an intermediary R-CoA thioester which is then epimerized to an
S-CoA thioester and in turn converted to S-ibuprofen. This results in a nonsignificant
difference in activity in vivo between the racemate and the individual enantiomers
[3,20,28–31]. Another example is the well-known thalidomide. Racemic thalidomide
was introduced as a relatively safe sedative drug in the late 1950s, but soon thereafter
Pharmacological Importance of Chiral Separations 7
H Acyl CoA H
H3C H3C
synthetase
CH-CH2 C CH3 CH-CH2 C CH3
H3C COOH Thioesterase H3C CO SCoA
R(–)-ibuprofen R(–)-ibuprofen-CoA
Epimerase
S(+)-ibuprofen S(+)-ibuprofen-CoA
it was withdrawn because it caused serious fetal malformations [11,32]. Studies have
shown that the sedative effect of thalidomide is related to the R-enantiomer and that
probably the S-enantiomer is responsible for the teratogenic effect [32]. These find-
ings have led to the wrong statement in literature that the thalidomide tragedy could
have been avoided if only the R-enantiomer would have been used. Since rapid race-
mization occurs in vivo, their difference in toxicity cannot be exploited [2]. Indeed,
the enantiomers of thalidomide undergo spontaneous hydrolysis and fast chiral
interconversion at physiological pH [20,32]. Since 1998, the use of thalidomide is
again approved by the Food and Drug Administration. However, now it is used for
the treatment of the debilitating and disfiguring lesions associated with erythema
nodosum leprosum (ENL), a complication of Hansen’s disease, commonly known
as leprosy. Recently, thalidomide was also approved for the treatment of multiple
myeloma. Known or possible pregnancy is of course an absolute contraindication to
the use of thalidomide [32].
1.4.1 ABSORPTION
Absorption is the process of the movement of the drug from the place of adminis-
tration into the bloodstream. This process requires the transport of drug molecules
through cell membranes. Three possible mechanisms are described: passive dif-
fusion through the membrane, facilitated diffusion via channels or carriers, and
active transport via carriers and pump systems. The absorption of most drugs is
a passive process; however, drugs can also be absorbed via active processes like
receptor-mediated transport. Active absorption may favor one enantiomer or the
two enantiomers may differ in absorption characteristics. l-Dopa, for example, is
actively absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. d-Dopa, on the other hand, enters
the bloodstream via passive diffusion [20].
The absorption rate is also an important parameter. An example is ibuprofen that
is already described earlier. The chiral inversion of inactive R-ibuprofen to the active
S-enantiomer in the gastrointestinal tract depends on the absorption rate: the longer
the drug stays in the gastrointestinal tract (i.e., low absorption rate), the greater will
be the extent of inversion [35].
1.4.2 DISTRIBUTION
Once the drug is available in the bloodstream, it will distribute throughout the
different compartments of the body. Two physicochemical properties are essentially
responsible for the distribution of drugs: plasma- and tissue protein binding and
the partition coefficient. Partitioning into various sites is a physical property and is
therefore not considered as enantioselective. However, binding to proteins, which
consists of chiral building blocks, can show stereoselectivity.
Stereoselective binding of chiral drugs to serum albumin and α1-acid glyco-
protein has already been shown. For example, the affinity for the binding of the
essential amino acid S-tryptophan to the benzodiazepine and indole site of human
serum albumin is about 100 times greater than that of R-tryptophan. An interesting
example is the antihypertensive drug propranolol. S-propranolol binds to α1-acid
glycoprotein to a slightly greater extent than R-propranolol [19,27,35]. However, the
stereoselective binding to human serum albumin is opposite of that observed for
α1-acid glycoprotein [20]. The overall stereoselectivity in the binding of propranolol
to human serum resembles that seen for α1-acid glycoprotein, meaning that the
free fraction of the R-enantiomer is higher than that of the pharmacological active
S-enantiomer [27].
Stereoselective distribution may also occur as a result of drug–lipid interactions.
Hanada et al. [36] have observed stereoselective binding of verapamil and disopyra-
mide to phosphatidylserine, a tissue-binding site for basic drugs, with R-verapamil
and R-disopyramide being preferentially bound [20,21,36].
Stereoselective interactions with tissue uptake transporter systems and storage
mechanisms have also been reported [20]. van Bree et al. [37] have studied the trans-
port of baclofen and its enantiomers across the blood–brain barrier in rats. They
showed that the blood–brain barrier clearance of R-baclofen was approximately four
times higher than that of the S-enantiomer. On the basis of their obtained results,
Pharmacological Importance of Chiral Separations 9
1.4.3 METABOLIZATION
Much of the stereoselectivity observed in pharmacokinetics is caused by stereose-
lective metabolic pathways. Both phases I and II metabolic reactions are capable of
discriminating between enantiomers. Three different groups can be distinguished
and are discussed in the following.
4.0 40
2C19 6.7 Hydroxy 1.8 2C19
Esomeprazole R-isomer
3A4 5-O-Desmethyl 3A4
3.9 0.8
Sulphone
Total CL int = 14.6 Total CL int = 42.6
FIGURE 1.5 Metabolism scheme illustrating the intrinsic clearance values (CLint) for
the different metabolic pathways of esomeprazole and R-omeprazole from in vitro experi-
ments on human liver microsomes [40,43]. (Reproduced from Andersson, T. et al., Clin.
Pharmacokinet., 40, 411, 2001. With permission.)
R R H
*
C O C
R1 R1 OH
(a)
R H
R1 R
* R1
C C C C
H
H R2 R2
H
(b)
R R
*
S S O
R1 R1
(c)
R R OH
*
CH2 C
R1 R1 H
(d)
FIGURE 1.6 Introduction of new chiral centers via reductive and oxidative metaboliza-
tion pathways. (a) Reduction of carbonyl to alcohol, (b) hydrogenation of alkenes to alkanes,
(c) sulfoxidation, and (d) hydroxylation. Asterisks indicates chiral center.
Pharmacological Importance of Chiral Separations 11
OH
N N
*
O N O O N O
O HO
N N
O NH2 O NH2
(a) (b)
FIGURE 1.8 Structure of (a) oxcarbazepine and (b) licarbazepine. Asterisks indicate the
chiral center.
CH3 CH3
OH O OH * OH
* *
O O O O
FIGURE 1.9 Structure of warfarin and warfarin alcohol. Asterisks indicate the chiral center.
12 Chiral Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis
1.6.1 AGE
Some studies have found that different age groups may be associated with age-
specific levels of exposure to drug enantiomers [49]. One example is here given. Tan
et al. [50] have shown that in elderly volunteers the free fraction of S-ibuprofen, and
Pharmacological Importance of Chiral Separations 13
not of the R-enantiomer, was increased when compared to young volunteers. They
also observed a decrease in the clearance of S-ibuprofen, particularly via oxida-
tive pathways, in these elderly volunteers. This higher availability of the active
S-enantiomer may contribute to the incidence of adverse reactions observed in the
elderly population.
1.6.2 GENDER
Not so much information can be found concerning the gender differences on the
level of stereoselective dispositions [49]. Although the antihypertensive effect of
labetalol was the same for men and women, the total plasma concentrations were
80% higher in women. This discrepancy could be explained by stereoselective
differences in the pharmacokinetics of the labetolol isomers in both groups. Indeed,
while the concentration of the (S,R)-isomer which has α-blocking properties and the
two relatively inactive (S,S)- and (R,S)-isomers were between 60% and 80% higher
in women, the concentrations of the main β-blocking (R,R)-isomer were the same in
both groups. This explains why similar antihypertensive effects were observed in
men and women [27,51].
different R/S ratios of verapamil in plasma were observed when racemic verapamil
was administered either in an immediate release or sustained release formulation
[56,57]. Mistry et al. [58] have studied the influence of the input rate on the ste-
reoselective pharmacokinetics of metoprolol. They have shown that the S/R ratio
for plasma metoprolol concentrations show significant differences in the absorption
phase (1–4 h) versus the terminal elimination phase (8–16 h) when fast input of the
drug is obtained. However, slow input displayed no significant difference in S/R ratio
between the absorption and elimination phase.
1.7.2 INTERACTIONS
The two enantiomers of a racemic drug may interact with each other at different
pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic levels. The R-enantiomer of propafenone,
a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug, for example, reduces the metabolism of the
S-enantiomer, leading to a significantly reduced oral clearance of S-propafenone
in the presence of the R-enantiomer [21]. When the enantiomers of disopyramide,
a class Ia antiarrhythmic drug, were administered separately to humans, no dif-
ferences in clearance, renal clearance, or volume of distribution were observed.
However, when racemic disopyramide was given, an important pharmacokinetic
interaction was observed, resulting in lower plasma and renal clearance, a longer
half-life, and a smaller volume of distribution for the S-enantiomer [6,45].
In addition to enantiomer–enantiomer interactions, a racemic drug may interact
stereoselectively with other drugs. For instance, the anticoagulant warfarin exhib-
its enantiomer–enantiomer interactions and in addition its elimination is altered in
a stereospecific manner by cimetidine [19,21]. R-warfarin inhibits the hydroxyla-
tion of S-warfarin, the pharmacologically more active enantiomer [59]. In addi-
tion, cimetidine decreases the rate of metabolism of R-warfarin and not that of the
S-enantiomer [60,61]. This results in an accumulation of R-warfarin which in turn
further suppresses the metabolism of S-warfarin. As a result, the active S-enantiomer
is accumulated and an increased anticoagulant activity is observed [19].
Four reasons for considering the enantiomers instead of the racemate are
proposed [64]. Firstly, the use of a single enantiomer may allow the reduction of
the dose while either maintaining or improving outcome. Secondly, the assessment
of the dose–response relationship of a single enantiomer may be simpler than for
a racemate. Thirdly, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variability between
patients may be reduced and fourthly, any toxicity from the inactive enantiomer
may be minimized [4,45,63,66]. Another reason, commercially, is that when patents
on racemic drugs expire, pharmaceutical companies may have the opportunity to
extend patent coverage through development of the chiral switch enantiomers with
desired bioactivity.
Although the aforementioned reasons appear to present compelling arguments
in favor of single enantiomers, there have been commercial failures as well as
successes [66]. In the case of bupivacaine, for example, improved tolerability was
gained using levobupivacaine. In 1979, seven cases of sudden cardiovascular col-
lapse with difficult resuscitation or death were reported after intravenous injection
of racemic bupivacaine. Levobupivacaine is significantly less cardiotoxic than the
racemate and has the same anesthetic profile. Therefore, the racemate was replaced
by the single enantiomer [66–68]. On the other hand, not all chiral switches were
as promising as levobupivacaine. The anorectic agent fenfluramine was one of the
first to undergo the chiral switch process with the marketing of the dextrorotary
S-enantiomer, dexfenfluramine. The levorotatory R-enantiomer was responsible for
most of the side effects seen with the racemate. Both fenfluramine and dexfenflu-
ramine were, however, withdrawn from the market because of a perceived risk of
pulmonary hypertension [2,14,66,68].
Besides switching from a racemate to an active enantiomer, the drug can also be
replaced by the active, chiral metabolite and, if possible, by the active enantiomer
of this metabolite. An example is the switch of hydroxyzine to its racemic active
metabolite cetirizine. Cetirizine is formed from oxidation of the primary alcohol of
hydroxyzine (Figure 1.10) [69,70]. Levocetirizine, the active enantiomer of cetiriz-
ine, is also on the market. A second example is eslicarbazepine, the S-enantiomer
of licarbazepine. Eslicarbazepine is a new drug currently undergoing clinical devel-
opment for the treatment of epilepsy [39]. Licarbazepine is the active metabolite
of oxcarbazepine (Figure 1.8). More information concerning these compounds is
already given in Section 1.4.3.2.
Cl
* CH N N CH2-CH2-O-CH2-R
Because of the low injection volume, the concentration sensitivity is low and stacking
procedures are therefore sometimes needed. Compared to LC and GC, precision is
worse due to the different injection mechanism. However, instrument manufacturers
and scientists have worked on improving the system performance. In recent years,
many fully validated CE methods have been described and CE is becoming a well-
established technique not only in academia but also in industry [83].
REFERENCES
1. Caldwell, J, Wainer, IW. 2001. Stereochemistry: Definitions and a note on nomenclature.
Hum Psychopharmacol 16: S105–S107.
2. Agranat, I, Caner, H, Caldwell, A. 2002. Putting chirality to work: The strategy of chiral
switches. Nature Rev Drug Discov 1: 753–768.
3. Cordato, DJ, Mather, LE, Herkes, GE. 2003. Stereochemistry in clinical medicine:
A neurological perspective. J Clin Neurosci 10: 649–654.
4. Caldwell, J. 2001. Do single enantiomers have something special to offer? Hum
Psychopharmacol 16: S67–S71.
5. Hutt, AJ, Tan, SC. 1996. Drug chirality and its clinical significance. Drugs 52: 1–12.
6. Agrawal, YK, Bhatt, HG, Raval, HG, Oza, PM, Gogoi, PJ. 2007. Chirality—A new era
of therapeutics. Mini Rev Med Chem 7: 451–460.
7. Cahn, RS, Ingold, C, Prelog, V. 1966. Specification of molecular chirality. Angew Chem
Int Ed 5: 385–415.
8. Prelog, V, Helmchen, G. 1982. Basic principles of the CIP-system and proposals for a
revision. Angew Chem Int Ed (English) 21: 567–583.
9. Ariëns, EJ. 1986. Stereochemistry: A source of problems in medicinal chemistry. Med
Res Rev 6: 451–466.
10. Ariëns, EJ. 1984. Stereochemistry, a basis for sophisticated nonsense in pharmacokinetics
and clinical pharmacology. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 26: 663–668.
11. Waldeck, B. 2003. Three-dimensional pharmacology, a subject ranging from ignorance
to overstatements. Pharmacol Toxicol 93: 203–210.
12. Andersson, T. 2004. Single-isomer drugs––True therapeutic advances. Clin Pharmacokinet
43: 279–285.
13. Ariëns, EJ. 1991. Racemic therapeutics-ethical and regulatory aspects. Eur J Clin
Pharmacol 41: 89–93.
14. Baumann, P, Zullino, DF, Eap, CB. 2002. Enantiomers’ potential in psychopharma-
cology—A critical analysis with special emphasis on the antidepressant escitalopram.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 12: 433–444.
15. Rentsch, KM. 2002. The importance of stereoselective determination of drugs in the
clinical laboratory. J Biochem Biophys Methods 54: 1–9.
16. Rivas-Vazquez, RA, Perel, JM. 2003. The role of stereochemistry and chiral pharmacology
in psychotropic drug development. Prof Psychol-Res Pract 34: 210–213.
17. Hyttel, J, Bøgesø, KP, Perregaard, J, Sánchez, C. 1992. The pharmacological effect of
citalopram residues in the (S)-(+)-enantiomer. J Neural Transm Gen Sect 88: 157–160.
18. Yevtushenko, VY, Belous, AI, Yevtushenko, YG, Gusinin, SE, Buzik, OJ, Agibalova,
TV. 2007. Efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram versus citalopram in major
depressive disorder: A 6-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind,
active-controlled study in adult outpatients. Clin Ther 29: 2319–2332.
19. Islam, MR, Mahdi, JG, Bowen, ID. 1997. Pharmacological importance of stereochemical
resolution of enantiomeric drugs. Drug Safety 17: 149–165.
20. Hutt, AJ. 2007. Chirality and pharmacokinetics: An area of neglected dimensionality?
Drug Metabol Drug Interact 22: 79–112.
Pharmacological Importance of Chiral Separations 19
21. Mehvar, R, Brocks, DR, Vakily, M. 2002. Impact of stereoselectivity on the pharma-
cokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiarrhythmic drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 41:
533–558.
22. Takahashi, H, Echizen, H. 2001. Pharmacogenetics of warfarin elimination and its
clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet 40: 587–603.
23. Lewis, RJ, Trager, WF, Chan, KK, Breckenridge, A, Orme, M, Roland, M, Schary, W.
1974. Warfarin. Stereochemical aspects of its metabolism and the interaction with
phenylbutazone. J Clin Invest 53: 1607–1617.
24. Busse, D, Templin, S, Mikus, G, Schwab, M, Hofmann, U, Eichelbaum, M, Kivisto,
KT. 2006. Cardiovascular effects of (R)- and (S)-verapamil and racemic verapamil in
humans: A placebo-controlled study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 62: 613–619.
25. Strolin Benedetti, M, Whomsley, R, Mathy, FX, Jacques, P, Espie, P, Canning, M. 2008.
Stereoselective renal tubular secretion of levocetirizine and dextrocetirizine, the two
enantiomers of the H1-antihistamine cetirizine. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 22: 19–23.
26. Heal, DJ, Pierce, DM. 2006. Methylphenidate and its isomers––Their role in the treatment
of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder using a transdermal delivery system. CNS
Drugs 20: 713–738.
27. Mehvar, R, Brocks, DR. 2001. Stereospecific pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
of beta-adrenergic blockers in humans. J Pharm Pharm Sci 4: 185–200.
28. Ali, I, Gupta, VK, Aboul-Enein, HY, Singh, P, Sharma, B. 2007. Role of racemization in
optically active drugs development. Chirality 19: 453–463.
29. Hutt, AJ, Caldwell, J. 1983. The metabolic chiral inversion of 2-arylpropionic acids—A
novel route with pharmacological consequences. J Pharm Pharmacol 35: 693–704.
30. Walle, T, Walle, UK. 1986. Chirality 4. Pharmacokinetic parameters obtained with
racemates. Trends Pharmacol Sci 7: 155–158.
31. Williams, DA. 2002. Drug metabolism. In Foye’s Principles of Medicinal Chemistry,
eds. D, Williams and T, Lemke. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
pp. 174–233.
32. Eriksson, T, Björkman, S, Höglund, P. 2001. Clinical pharmacology of thalidomide.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol 57: 365–376.
33. Caldwell, J. 1995. Stereochemical determinants of the nature and consequences of drug
metabolism. J Chromatogr A 694: 39–48.
34. Caldwell, J. 1996. Importance of stereospecific bioanalytical monitoring in drug
development. J Chromatogr A 719: 3–13.
35. Jamali, F, Mehvar, R, Pasutto, FM. 1989. Enantioselective aspects of drug action and
disposition––Therapeutic pitfalls. J Pharm Sci 78: 695–715.
36. Hanada, K, Akimoto, S, Mitsui, K, Mihara, K, Ogata, H. 1998. Enantioselective tissue
distribution of the basic drugs disopyramide, flecainide, and verapamil in rats: Role of
plasma protein and tissue phosphatidylserine binding. Pharm Res 15: 1250–1256.
37. van Bree, JB, Heijligers-Feijen, CD, de Boer, AG, Danhof, M, Breimer, DD. 1991.
Stereoselective transport of baclofen across the blood-brain barrier in rats as determined
by the unit impulse response methodology. Pharm Res 8: 259–262.
38. Barraud de Lagerie, S, Comets, E, Gautrand, C, Fernandez, C, Auchere, D, Singlas,
E, Mentre, F, Gimenez, F. 2004. Cerebral uptake of mefloquine enantiomers with
and without the P-gp inhibitor elacridar (GF1210918) in mice. Br J Pharmacol 141:
1214–1222.
39. Alves, G, Figueiredo, I, Falcão, A, Castel-Branco, M, Caramona, M, Soares-DA-Silva, P.
2008. Stereoselective disposition of S- and R-licarbazepine in mice. Chirality 20:
796–804.
40. Andersson, T, Hassan-Alin, M, Hasselgren, G, Röhss, K, Weidolf, L. 2001. Pharmacokinetic
studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole. Clin Pharmacokinet 40:
411–426.
20 Chiral Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis
41. Olbe, L, Carlsson, E, Lindberg, P. 2003. A proton-pump inhibitor expedition: The case
histories of omeprazole and esomeprazole. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2: 132–139.
42. Andersson, T, Rohss, K, Bredberg, E, Hassan-Alin, M. 2001. Pharmacokinetics and
pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther 15: 1563–1569.
43. Abelo, A, Andersson, TB, Antonsson, M, Naudot, AK, Skanberg, I, Weidolf, L. 2000.
Stereoselective metabolism of omeprazole by human cytochrome P450 enzymes. Drug
Metab Dispos 28: 966–972.
44. Lindberg, P, Keeling, D, Fryklund, J, Andersson, T, Lundborg, P, Carlsson, E. 2003.
Review article: Esomeprazole-enhanced bio-availability, specificity for the proton pump
and inhibition of acid secretion. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17: 481–488.
45. Triggle, DJ. 1997. Stereoselectivity of drug action. Drug Discov Today 2: 138–147.
46. Vogelgesang, B, Echizen, H, Schmidt, E, Eichelbaum, M. 1984. Stereoselective 1st
pass metabolism of highly cleared drugs––Studies of the bioavailability of l-verapamil
and d-verapamil examined with a stable isotope technique. Br J Clin Pharmacol 18:
733–740.
47. Volosov, A, Xiaodong, S, Perucca, E, Yagen, B, Sintov, A, Bialer, M. 1999.
Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of 10-hydroxycarbazepine after oral administration
of oxcarbazepine to healthy Chinese subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 66: 547–553.
48. Hermans, JJR, Thijssen, HHW. 1992. Stereoselective acetonyl side chain reduction of
warfarin and analogs. Partial characterization of two cytosolic carbonyl reductases.
Drug Metab Dispos 20: 268–274.
49. Brocks, DR. 2006. Drug disposition in three dimensions: An update on stereoselectivity
in pharmacokinetics. Biopharm Drug Dispos 27: 387–406.
50. Tan, SC, Patel, BK, Jackson, SH, Swift, CG, Hutt, AJ. 1999. Ibuprofen stereochemistry:
Double-the-trouble? Enantiomer 4: 195–203.
51. Johnson, JA, Akers, WS, Herring, VL, Wolfe, MS, Sullivan, JM. 2000. Gender differences
in labetalol kinetics: Importance of determining stereoisomer kinetics for racemic drugs.
Pharmacotherapy 20: 622–628.
52. Scordo, MG, Spina, E, Dahl, ML, Gatti, G, Perucca, E. 2005. Influence of CYP2C9,
2C19, and 2D6 genetic polymorphisms on the steady-state plasma concentrations of the
enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 97: 296–301.
53. Jamali, F, Kunz-Dober, CM. 1999. Pain-mediated altered absorption and metabolism of
ibuprofen: An explanation for decreased serum enantiomer concentration after dental
surgery. Br J Clin Pharmacol 47: 391–396.
54. Neugebauer, G, Gabor, M, Reiff, K. 1992. Disposition of carvedilol enantiomers in
patients with liver cirrhosis: Evidence for disappearance of stereoselective first-pass
extraction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 19: S142–S146.
55. Imamura, H, Komori, T, Ismail, A, Suenaga, A, Otagiri, M. 2002. Stereoselective protein
binding of alprenolol in the renal diseased state. Chirality 14: 599–603.
56. Bhatti, MM, Lewanczuk, RZ, Pasutto, FM, Foster, RT. 1995. Pharmacokinetics of
verapamil and norverapamil enantiomers after administration of immediate and con-
trolled-release formulations to humans: Evidence suggesting input-rate determined
stereoselectivity. J Clin Pharmacol 35: 1076–1082.
57. Karim, A, Piergies, A. 1995. Verapamil stereoisomerism: Enantiomeric ratios in plasma
dependent on peak concentrations, oral input rate, or both. Clin Pharmacol Ther 58:
174–184.
58. Mistry, B, Leslie, JL, Eddington, ND. 2002. Influence of input rate on the stereospecific and
nonstereospecific first pass metabolism and pharmacokinetics of metoprolol extended
release formulations. Chirality 14: 297–304.
Pharmacological Importance of Chiral Separations 21
59. Kunze, KL, Eddy, AC, Gibaldi, M, Trager, WF. 1991. Metabolic enantiomeric
interactions: The inhibition of human (S)-warfarin-7-hydroxylase by (R)-warfarin.
Chirality 3: 24–29.
60. Choonara, IA, Cholerton, S, Haynes, BP, Breckenridge, AM, Park, BK. 1986.
Stereoselective interaction between the R enantiomer of warfarin and cimetidine. Br J
Clin Pharmacol 21: 271–277.
61. Niopas, I, Toon, S, Rowland, M. 1991. Further insight into the stereoselective interaction
between warfarin and cimetidine in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 32: 508–511.
62. Caner, H, Groner, E, Levy, L, Agranat, I. 2004. Trends in the development of chiral
drugs. Drug Discov Today 9: 105–110.
63. Agranat, I, Caner, H. 1999. Intellectual property and chirality of drugs. Drug Discov
Today 4: 313–321.
64. Hindmarch, I. 2001. The enantiomer debate: Current status and future directions. Hum
Psychopharmacol 16: S101–S104.
65. Directive 75/318/EEC. 1993. Investigation of Chiral Active Substances.
66. Leonard, BE. 2001. An introduction to enantiomers in psychopharmacology. Hum
Psychopharmacol 16: S79–S84.
67. McClellan, KJ, Spencer, CM. 1998. Levobupivacaine. Drugs 56: 355–362.
68. Tucker, GT. 2000. Chiral switches. Lancet 355: 1085–1087.
69. Presa, IJ. 1999. H1 antihistamines: A review. Alergol Immunol Clin 14: 300–312.
70. Nelson, WL. 2002. Antihistamines and related antiallergic and antiulcer agents. In Foye’s
Principles of Medicinal Chemistry, eds. D, Williams and T, Lemke. Philadelphia, PA:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 794–818.
71. Gübitz, G, Schmid, MG. 2001. Chiral separation by chromatographic and electromigration
techniques. A review. Biopharm Drug Dispos 22: 291–336.
72. Ward, TJ. 2002. Chiral separations. Anal Chem 74: 2863–2872.
73. Chankvetadze, B. 2001. Enantioseparation of chiral drugs and current status of electro-
migration techniques in this field. J Sep Sci 24: 691–705.
74. Blaschke, G, Chankvetadze, B. 2000. Enantiomer separation of drugs by capillary
electromigration techniques. J Chromatogr A 875: 3–25.
75. Amini, A. 2001. Recent developments in chiral capillary electrophoresis and applications
of this technique to pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. Electrophoresis 22:
3107–3130.
76. Gübitz, G, Schmid, MG. 2000. Recent progress in chiral separation principles in
capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 21: 4112–4135.
77. Hjertén, S. 1967. Free zone electrophoresis. Chromatogr Rev 9: 122–219.
78. Lele, M, Lele, SM, Petersen, JR, Mohammad, AA. 2001. Capillary electrophoresis:
General overview and applications in the clinical laboratory. In Clinical and Forensic
Applications of Capillary Electrophoresis, eds. JR, Petersen and AA, Mohammad.
Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 3–20.
79. Jorgenson, JW, Lukacs, KD. 1981. Free-zone electrophoresis in glass-capillaries. Clin
Chem 27: 1551–1553.
80. Jorgenson, JW, Lukacs, KD. 1981. High-resolution separations based on electrophoresis
and electroosmosis. J Chromatogr 218: 209–216.
81. Jorgenson, JW, Lukacs, KD. 1981. Zone electrophoresis in open-tubular glass-capillaries.
Anal Chem 53: 1298–1302.
82. Issaq, HJ. 2002. Thirty-five years of capillary electrophoresis: Advances and perspectives.
J Liq Chrom Rel Technol 25: 1153–1170.
83. Altria, KD, Elder, D. 2004. Overview of the status and applications of capillary
electrophoresis to the analysis of small molecules. J Chromatogr A 1023: 1–14.
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
with frequency pictures of native life that are vivid and finely
written.”
“The story is frank and sincere and full of isolated perceptions that
are both searching and beautiful. But it is also thin and scrappy and
disjointed, and the complete shadowiness of all the characters robs
its theories of the inner energy of a human content. In a word,
Madame Marx has felt very deeply and reflected intensely, and those
who agreed with her passionately have taken it for granted that she
has written a great book. But that is taking for granted far too much.”
Ludwig Lewisohn
“It does seem to me that the book might more appropriately have
been called ‘A woman.’ For the rest, the book is perfervid in a way
that we do not quite like in America, perhaps because we are not
wholly acclimated to it. It has pages of unusual beauty, and a high
degree of unity and directness.”
The long narrative poem of the title depicts courage born of love
and begetting the brotherhood of man even in the untamed. A fair
damsel is carried off by a pirate galley into the captivity of a khalif’s
harem. Her lover follows into slavery to rescue her. He does so with
the aid of a brother slave who must kill a traitor to accomplish their
purpose. Recaptured and brought before the khalif they are set free
because their tale causes human stirrings in the hawk breast of the
latter. The other poems are: The hounds of hell; Cap on head;
Sonnets; The passing strange; Animula; The Lemmings; Forget; On
growing old; Lyric.
+ Ath p718 My 28 ’20 60w
“Mr Masefield is the single poet writing in English today who both
in popular esteem and by the most exacting critical estimate
legitimately belongs to the august line of poets who are among the
chief glories of our race: to his greatness no journalistic cavil can add
or take away.” R. M. Weaver
“In this poem, [On growing old], as in so many aspects of the other
poems in this volume, one feels the shadows of the world, deepened
by the tumult of war, settling upon the radiance of a brave visionary
spirit. The thrill, the excitement, the adventures of living are all now
subdued to this key of sadness, in which the passion and beauty that
was once a flame becomes an effable glow.” W. S. B.
“One of the signs that the times are good in English poetry is the
fact that Mr Masefield keeps on writing poems which tell stories.”
Mark Van Doren
“In his latest volume there are some serious offenses against
rhyming, euphony, and scansion, but in the larger aspects, in the
essential substance and indescribable quality of authentic poesy, he
is more richly endowed than any other living writer.” Lawrence
Mason
[2]
MASEFIELD, JOHN. Right Royal. *$1.75
Macmillan 821
20–18954
“It is growing very trite to say that Mr Masefield does this thing or
that thing better than any contemporary poet. He does the things
that nobody else does and is thus in competition with himself. ‘Right
Royal’ may not be as fine a poem as ‘Enslaved,’ but no one can
dispute that it is the best narrative of a horse-race that has been
written by any modern poet.” W: S. Braithwaite
Reviewed by W. B. D. Henderson
+ N Y Evening Post p2 N 20 ’20 1650w
Reviewed by R: Le Gallienne
Reviewed by G: D. Procter
“He piles simile on simile and each simile is beautiful in itself, each
is a patch of ornament stuck on, not woven into the fabric. Mr
Masefield has told a brave tale bravely. If his courage had been like
Right Royal’s, he would have dared to leave undecorated the beauty
inherent in the tale.”
“As a story of the sea it ranks with the best of Jack London or
Morgan Robertson, and as a story of the uncanny it is comparable
with ‘Dracula’ and ‘The master of Ballantrae.’”
Reviewed by H: T. Finck
“A charming autobiography.”
+ Brooklyn 12:68 Ja ’20 40w
“His narrative, like his music, reveals facility, grace, and charm,
and is alternately gay and sentimental to the point of pathos. One is
not very much wiser after reading the book, but one closes it with a
certain regret at parting from such amiable company.” Henrietta
Straus
Reviewed by S. P. Sherman
“The word which fits his style exactly is one of the best adjectives
in our language which the language is guilty of criminal negligence in
permitting itself gradually to lose—the word ‘lusty.’ If it were dead
instead of merely decaying, it might be recalled to life by the easy,
careless, rushing vigor of Mr Massingham’s undaunted prose.”
Reviewed by G: Saintsbury
“He claims, and with justice, that the ordinary reader will find here
a whole body of poetry with which he has never before had the
chance of making acquaintance. This is a service for which the
student of English poetry will be heartily grateful to Mr Massingham.
But if he be a lover as well as student he will probably find it hard to
keep down some irritation at an anthologist who sets out with the
resolve to give him as few as possible of the poems which he is
known to like.”
“If Masters can rid himself of his oracular airs and the bad
Browning-Shakespeare patois with which he wearies his staunchest
admirers, there are few limits to his possible achievements.
‘Domesday book’ is too diffuse and prosy to be a masterpiece of
poetic fiction, but it contains the seeds and strength—and the hope—
of one.” L: Untermeyer
“The great American poem of the war has come in the ‘Domesday
book’ and come from the hand of the poet who laid the foundation in
the synoptic Americanism of the ‘Spoon river anthology.’ The latter
was a great work; ‘Domesday book’ is greater.... ‘Domesday book’ is a
great national topic of America’s soul symbolized in the character of
Elenor Murray.” W: S. Braithwaite
“The trouble with ‘Domesday book’ is chiefly that it thins this raw
material out until it becomes hopelessly prosaic. The realism of
‘Spoon river’ had the virtue of selection and of epigram. In his latest
work, Mr Masters has become extensive without any corresponding
enlargement of the imagination and the power behind his broader
canvas.” O. M. Sayler
“The total effect is often crude and heavy, now pretentious, now
hopelessly flat; and yet beneath these uncompleted surfaces are the
sinews of enormous power, a greedy gusto for life, a wide imaginative
experience, an abundance of the veritable stuff of existence—all this,
and yet not an authentic masterpiece. ‘Spoon river anthology’ still
has no rival from the hand of its creator.” C. V. D.
“For all its largeness of intention, all its vitality and forcefulness,
‘Domesday book’ is not, to my mind, finally articulated. It seems to
me unfinished. I do not mean that the poem is not brought to a
conclusion. It is concluded, and, I believe, appropriately concluded.
But it has parts that should have been cut away or have been more
wrought over.” Padraic Colum
“The first part is very interesting, and the whole book is readable.
Its essence is prosaic, though a back door is left open through which
poetry can let herself in in a neighborly fashion, if she chooses. Her
visits are infrequent.” O. W. Firkins
“If fidelity to nature were the whole of art, Mitch Miller would be a
perfect book, or almost perfect.... The defect in the author’s method
comes out in the end of the book.... Is there nothing in American life
significant and interesting enough to make it worth while for a boy
like Mitch to grow up? Perhaps there is not; but if that is true, it is an
artistic problem to be faced, not evaded through a petulant
dismantling of a stage well set.” Alvin Johnson
Reviewed by E. L. Pearson
“In ‘Starved Rock’ there is little music but much food for thought.”
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookfinal.com