LESSON11-15Q2PHILO
LESSON11-15Q2PHILO
1)
FREEDOM
❑ The human capacity to act (or not to act) as we choose or prefer
without any external compulsion or restraint.
❑ It is an intrinsic and essential property of a person.
❑ Important indication of human freedom is the ability to MAKE
CHOICES and PERFORM ACTIONS.
Our freedom to act sets us apart from other beings.
KINDS OF FREEDOM
1. Physical Freedom Also called as “freedom of choice”. The person is
free to perform actions that he/ she considers right and wise. A person is
also free to act or not to act. Psychological freedom is INNATE and
CANOT BE DENIED AS A PERSON.
Example:
1. Freedom to choose your friends
2. Freedom to choose your partner
3. Freedom to choose your course in college
4. Freedom to be what you want to be
3. Moral Freedom
Using freedom in a manner that upholds human dignity and goodness.
Example:
1. Doing charitable works
2. Participating on outreach activities
3. Being sensitive to the needs of other
4. Being prudent on the use of social media
5. Participating volunteer works.
Absolute Freedom
Absolute freedom- no form of hindrance that would prevent from doing
what you want. Should freedom be absolute? Definitely NO- freedom
always had its limitations. Freedom is always coupled with
RESPONSIBILITY.
Ethics
❑ Ethics is a branch of philosophy that deals with the systematic
questioning and critical examination of the underlying principles of
morality.
❑ A moral agent is a person who has the ability to discern right from
wrong and to be held accountable for his or her own actions. Moral
agents have a moral responsibility not to cause unjustified harm.
❑ A moral decision is a choice made based on a person's ethics,
manners, character, and what they believe is proper behavior. These
decisions tend to affect not only our own well-being, but the well-being
of others.
Moral Dilemma
❑ Dilemma- a situation where a person is forced to choose between
two or more conflicting options, neither of which is acceptable.
❑ When dilemmas involve human actions which have moral
implications, they are called ethical or moral dilemmas.
❑ Moral dilemmas are situations where persons, who are called “moral
agents” in ethics, are forced to choose between two or more conflicting
options, neither of which resolves the situation in a morally acceptable
manner.
Intersubjectivity
❑ Intersubjectivity- It refers to shared meanings constructed by people
in their interactions with each other.
❑ Intersubjectivity is the philosophical concept of the interaction
between the “self” and the “other”. It is the mutual recognition of each
other as persons.
❑ It refers to the shared awareness, and understanding among persons.
It is made possible by the awareness of the self and the other.
Jean-Paul Sartre
❑ Jean Paul Sartre, explains that when you look at a person, the act of
objectification allows you to capture that person’s freedom to be what
he or she wants to be. That is, you are limiting a person’s possibilities by
a look.
❑ This is evident when you stereotype or label a person based on his or
her appearance or certain actions.
Totalization
● TOTALIZATION occurs when one limit the other to a set of rational
categories, be they racial, sexual or otherwise. One totalize the other
when one claim he/ she already know who is that person before they
can even speak to.
Edmund Husserl
❑ Edmund Husserl believes that intersubjectivity is more than just
shared understanding, but it is the capability to put oneself in the place
where the other is.
❑ Intersubjectivity occurs when people undergo acts of empathy
because an intersubjective experience is highly empathic. This happens
when people put themselves in the shoes of others.
● Empathy- the ability to share emotions. This emotion is driven by a
person’s awareness that the other is a person thoughts and feelings.
● Empathy enables us to experience another person’s emotions, such as
happiness, anger, and sadness.
● Sympathy is “feeling with”, while empathy is “feeling in”
Rene Descartes
❑ An advocate of individualism.
❑ As a proponent of the doctrine of individualism, he resolved to doubt
absolutely everything that could possibly be doubted--in the hope of
thereby finding something that was beyond doubt. (“Doubt everything
that can be doubted”)
❑ According to him there is one thing that cannot be doubted, and that
is thinking.
● “Seeming”- actions where an individual presents himself or herself in a
certain way when dealing with others. Persons take on “roles” or act out
characters when dealing with certain people or when in certain
situations.
● There may be instances when people behave a certain way in order to
intentionally deceive or manipulate other people.
❖ Most human interactions, however, are not based on deception.
Since our human nature derives us to uphold dignity and goodness, our
interactions with others are also geared towards what is good and
beneficial. These lead human to strive to achieve deeper and more
substantial interactions and relations with other people. This deeper and
more genuine interaction is called dialogue.
“I-It” relationship
❑ “I-It” relationship is the second type of relationship.
❑ There are people that treat the other people into the status of an
object—an It.
❑ Examples:
1. Researchers who have indigenous people as their participants. They
are very prone to reducing the other into mere It, i.e. as mere objects of
investigation.
2. In the medical field when practitioners look at their patients as objects
of investigation.
❑ There are also “I-It” relations where the I clearly has bad intent on the
other, treating the other as mere It or object. Examples:
1. How oppressive employers treat their workers like machines or robots
who are immune to physical, verbal, psychological, and emotional abuse
2. Any relationship which has one party reducing the other to a status of
an object:
a) bully who treats a person with disability as an object of his
amusement
b) a liquor company using body of women as their advertisement to
improve sales,
c) partners or friends treating each other as objects and means to satisfy
their self-interest and desires in so-called "friends with benefits" type of
relationships. Objectification of women in advertising
❑ This kind of relationship results into what we call alienation.
❑ It happens when human relationships are inauthentic, deceptive and
exploitative. It arises when a person ceases to view the other as a
distinct or authentic person and merely considers the other person as a
mere object or a means to satisfy personal interests.
❑ Alienation is a disorientating sense of exclusion and separation and if
left unaddressed, will discount the humanity and dignity of a person that
leads to dehumanization.
“I-Thou” relationship
❑ It is in this kind of human relations that genuine sharing of one
another takes place.
❑ It is in this type of relationship that the other is treated as distinctly
other, the I treats the person as a Thou (You)—-as another person who
is different from the I; one has a different set of interests, visions,
beliefs, values, and characteristics.
❑ The center of this relationship is a genuine form of conversation: a
dialogue. Authentic Dialogue
❑Authentic dialogue is a form of interpersonal communication which
occurs when people recognize that they are part of a greater whole and
can relate with others within the whole.
❑In some cases, non-verbal dialogical relations are not only the more
appropriate means of conversation, but considered as a more profound
form of conversation.
❑ I-Thou relationship for Buber is the experience of being through
conversation in communion with the other; and here, the other may not
necessarily be a human being. It could be your dog, or your tree, or God.
❑ In line with this, we must remember that a privileged form of
relationship is the I-Thou relationship. This relationship involves effort.
LGBTQI++ Community
❑ The members of the LGBT community are also victims of different
types of violence. Many of them are experiencing numerous adverse
treatments like bullying, discrimination, physical violence, and even
sexual assault because of their sexual orientations and gender identities.
LGBTQI++ Community They are also facing work-related issues. Based on
the first-ever Corporate SOGIE Diversity and Inclusiveness (CSDI) Index, a
study that was administered by the Philippine LGBT Chamber of
Commerce and research firm Cogencia and was participated by 100
Philippine-based companies, not a single Filipino company has any
implementing policy that will protect their employees who are members
of the LGBT community from various forms of discrimination within the
working environment.
❑ According to Emmanuel Levinas (1905-1995), a French philosopher,
we must go beyond ourselves and concentrate more on rendering
assistance passionately and acting with concern toward others,
particularly to the members of our society who have become victims of
different dimensions of poverty.
❑ We should have the courage to defend them from any form of social
deprivation and discrimination. We can do this by voicing out our
concerns and obligating our government officials to enact bills and
ordinances, or strictly implement the laws that we already have, that
aim to protect the underprivileged from several oppressive treatments
and make these people enjoy the same social services, such as
education, employment, and health care, as most of the members of the
society.
❑ Also, we can help the underprivileged by sincerely and consistently
joining in campaigns or movements that seek to empower them.
❑ It is our obligation to help the underprivileged, since they are
considered as vulnerable to different forms of human rights violation
and social deprivation.
❑ It is also important to promote inclusivity- the practice or policy of
providing equal access to opportunities and resources for people who
might otherwise be excluded or marginalized, such as those having
physical or mental disabilities or belonging to other minority groups.
❑ Most importantly, it is our moral duty to uphold human dignity and
importance of life, because even though we are totally different from
each other, our shared dignity and humanity is the thing that unifies us
all
Pastoral Society
-Characterized by the domestication of animals for food for a more
stable and predictable food supply.
-Pastoral societies often produce surplus food and resources.
-Leads to the emergence of specialized tasks in the community.
Horticultural Society
-Primarily engages in the smallscale cultivation of plants, fruits, and
vegetables and the domestication of animals.
-Semi-nomadic
-The assignment of tasks and occupations were often based on gender.
Feudal society
-Based on the ownership of land.
-Originated during Medieval Age in Western Europe
-Members of society are organized based on status
-Social relations are characterized by dependence.
Industrial society
-Based on the use of specialized machinery in the production of goods
and services.
-“Industrial Revolution”
-Technological advances in this period resulted in improved trade and
commerce.
-Work is done in factories
-Lead to greater inequalities in wealth, power, and influence.
1. Terminus which means the full stop or end of a line. For them, life
ends and nothing follows.
2. Telos which means “goal, purpose, or fulfillment”.
Death is not the goal of life
Man is put on this earth to live a meaningful life, to be virtuous and
achieve excellence
We can look at two experiences which make us reflect on the meaning
of life: happiness and suffering.
Sufferings are necessary, without it, we are unable to grow and improve.
Remember that difficulties are not without reason.