Lesson Plan RWS Week2
Lesson Plan RWS Week2
Department of Education
MIMAROPA REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF PUERTO PRINCESA CITY
PALAWAN NATIONAL SCHOOL
D. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson, the learners should be able to:
1. Understand critical reading as a form of reasoning;
2. Identify the steps in critical reading as reasoning; and
3. Evaluate a particular text through critical reading.
II. CONTENT
Critical reading as reasoning
CO-1stQuarter-CBD
Yes, Nikka.
Thank you, Nikka. Before you settle The students pick up the
in your seats, kindly pick up all the pieces of paper and
trashes under your chairs and throw plastic.
them inside the trashcans/bins.
Checking of
attendance Let us check your attendance first.
Our class monitor, Alex. Who’s None, sir. Everybody is
absent? present.
Very good.
2
To increase our involvement today,
let us do this energizer.
Yes, Sir!
B. LESSON
PROPER
REVIEW OR At this point, to assess if you truly Our topic last meeting
understood the topic last meeting, was all about hypertext
INTRODUCTION
can someone tell me what our and intertext, Sir.
lesson was last meeting? Yes, Trisha.
a. Reviewing
the Hypertext is a non-linear
previous That is correct, Trisha. Then what is way to present
hypertext and intertext?Yes, Pia. information and is
lesson or
usually accomplished
presenting using “links” or system
the new of text that is linked to
lesson other texts, while
intertext refers to the
relationship between
Exactly, Pia. And what are the types texts, where one text
of intertext?Yes, Eman. influences, refers to, or
interacts with another.
Sir.
3
Very good! I am pleased that you Sir.
can still remember our last lesson.
Before we move on, for today’s
lesson, we come up with three
goals/objectives which you need to
develop or master at least within
you at the end of this lesson.
DAILY
OBJECTIVES Please read our obejctives for today, At the end of the lesson,
Blanchie. the learners should be
able to:
b. Establishin
g a purpose 1. Understand critical
for the reading as a form of
lesson reasoning;
2. Identify the steps in
critical reading as
reasoning; and
3. Evaluate a particular
text through critical
Thank you, Blanchie! reading.
PRE-ACTIVITY
Prior to our discussion, I want to ask, Yes, sir. I realized that
have you ever seen a news article or those posts were fake
c. Presenting
post online that turned out to be because of they lacked
examples
false? How did you realize it? evidence and logical
or
reasoning.
Instances Alright, at this point, to give you
of the new further knowledge about our topic,
lesson let us have an activity.
4
Processing questions:
Possible answer:
1. What role does evidence and
reasoning play in verifying 1. Evidence and
information? reasoning help us
2. How can we avoid being misled by determine whether
false claims? information or headlines
are credible and
accurate, allowing us to
decide if they are real or
fake.
2. To avoid being misled
by false claims and
information, we should
always fact-check
sources, analyze
evidence, and evaluate
the logic of the article or
Exactly! We have to be critical text's claims.
reader and actively question, assess,
and interpret information rather than
accepting it at face value.
Critical reading is
engaging in analytic
activity which involves
the reader by asking
And those who are involved in that questions about the text
activity are called critical readers and the author’s claim.
because.. Please read, Joash.
Critical readers are
doing the process of
evaluating, analyzing,
6
and interpreting the
assertion of the hidden
On the other hand, reasoning is meaning of the whole
defined by Merriam Webster text.
dictionary as… Please read, Anna.
Reasoning is defined by
Merriam Webster
dictionary as an act of
giving statements for
Let us all remember that critical justification and
reading is not about criticizing but… explanation.
Please read, Lex.
Remember that Critical
reading is not meant to
criticize but to assess
Combining the two, please read the the validity of textual
critical reading as reasoning, Jasper. evidence.
Critical reading as
reasoning means
engaging with a text
analytically rather than
Critical reading as reasoning passively accepting the
involves some process. Please read, information.
Monica.
Critical reading as
reasoning involves:
Assessing the
validity of
arguments
Identifying biases
and assumptions
Examining evidence
used to support
claims
Forming logical
conclusions based
on reasoning
Example:
General Rule: All birds have
wings.
Specific Case: A sparrow is a
bird.
Conclusion: Therefore, a
sparrow has wings.
Example:
Observation: The sun has risen
in the east every day I’ve seen
it.
Pattern: The sun always rises
in the east.
General Conclusion: The sun
will always rise in the east.
Observation: Every dog I’ve
seen has four legs.
Pattern: All the dogs I’ve
encountered have four legs.
Thank you, Alma. Please read the General Conclusion: All dogs
third one, Alvin. probably have four legs.
3. Abductive
reasoning- It is a way
of thinking where we
make the best possible
guess based on limited
information. It involves
looking at clues, forming
a logical explanation,
and choosing the most
likely answer, even if it’s
not certain.
Example:
Observation: A patient has a
8
fever, cough, and sore throat.
Possible Causes: It could be
the flu, a cold, or another
illness.
Thank you, Alvin. Please read the Best Guess: The doctor infers
last one, Arnold. that the patient most likely has
the flu based on the
symptoms.
4. Analogical
reasoning- It is a way
of thinking where we
compare two similar
situations to draw a
conclusion.
Example:
Known Situation (Case A):
Learning to ride a bike took
practice and patience.
Similar Situation (Case B):
Now, let’s have an activity to help Learning to drive a car also
you fully grasp the concept of critical requires practice and patience.
Conclusion: Since practice
reading as reasoning.
ANALYSIS helped in learning to ride a
bike, it will likely help in
/ ABSTRACTION Activity: FIND ME! learning to drive.
Processing question:
9
Evaluating claims and
supporting statements is
essential for determining
Precisely!It is important to evaluate the credibility, accuracy,
information carefully in today's and reliability of the
world, where we encounter a vast information presented,
amount of content through news, allowing us to
social media, advertisements, and distinguish facts from
academic texts, as some of which opinions or false
may be fake. information.
Types of Assertions:
Fact – A statement
that can be proven
true or false through
research,
observation, or
Please read the second one, Amelyn. evidence.
Example: "Water boils at
100°C." (Scientific fact)
Convention – A
statement based on
social norms,
traditions, or
commonly accepted
rules.
Please read the third one, Jay-r.
Example: "Shaking hands is a
sign of respect." (Cultural
norm)
10
society or culture?
Opinion – A
statement based on
personal beliefs,
feelings, or
Please read the fifth one, Marlo. judgments rather
than objective facts.
Example: "Chocolate is the
best dessert." (Subjective
opinion)
Preference – A
statement that
Alright, please read the second step expresses personal
of critical reading as reasoning, John. choices or desires.
Example: "I like reading
fiction." (Individual preference)
2. Formulating
Counterclaims- It is a
statement that
challenges or opposes
the main argument
(claim).
We also have characteristics of the
strong counterclaim. Please read, Example:
Anamie. Claim: "Online learning is the
best mode of education."
Counterclaim: "Face-to-face
learning is more effective for
hands-on subjects."
Characteristics of a
Strong Counterclaim:
Types of Evidence:
Please read the second one, Mark.
Statistical
Evidence – Uses
numbers, surveys,
or data to support a
claim.
Anecdotal
Evidence – Uses
personal
experiences or real-
life examples.
Example: "I improved my
grades after switching to
And please read the last one, Mauie. online learning."
Expert Testimony
– Uses statements
from credible
experts in the field.
Example: "Dr. Smith, an
education expert, states that
blended learning improves
student engagement."
12
sounding too direct or
confrontational.
Example:
Example Without Hedges (Too
We have the different forms of Harsh)
hedges. Please read, Jomer. "Your argument is completely
wrong. Online learning is
ineffective."
Different forms of
In a nutshell, how do you define
hedges:
critical reading as a form of
reasoning in your own words? Yes,
Modals: may, could,
JM.
would, should, might,
certain, must, etc.
Frequency adverbs:
usually, generally,
commonly
Probability adverbs:
probably, possibly,
Bravo, JM. Then, what are the types
presumably
of critical reading? Yes, Carmela.
Critical reading as
reasoning goes beyond
understanding words—it
involves questioning,
analyzing, and
evaluating information
logically, Sir.
Excellent, Carmela! Now, Give me
the Steps in Critical Reading as
The types of critical
Reasoning, yes, Pamela.
reading are: Deductive,
Inductive, Abductive,
and Analogical
reasoning.
Precisely! It seems to me that you
really understood what we have
discussed earlier.
Yes, Sir.
None so far.
14
To further strengthen your
understanding about our topic, I
prepared another activity for you.
16
statistics, and expert
opinions. Also, I would
look in to their language
if it provokes
emotionally appealing
emotional state of the
generalizatio audience without
concrete and logical
ns and
evidence. If so, then I
abstractions can tell that the speech
about the is nothing but a piece of
lesson propaganda.
17
d) The use of vivid language and storytelling
5-10:
Directions: You will be
Article given an article. After
reading, identify at least
2 weaknesses in the
argument. Once you
have identified the
weaknesses, rewrite the
argument to make it
stronger. Ensure that
your revised version
includes clear reasoning,
well-supported
evidence, and a
balanced perspective.
You will be given 5
Okay, if you’re done . Please pass all minutes to complete the
your papers in front. task.
REMARKS
III. REFLECTION
Reflect on your teaching and assess yourself as a teacher. Think about your student’s progress
this week. What works? What else needs to be done to help the students learn? Identify what
help your instructional supervisors can provide for you so that when you meet them, you can
ask them relevant questions.
A. No. of learners who earned 80% in the evaluation.
B. No. of learners who require additional activities for remediation who scored below 80%.
C. Did the remedial lessons work? No. of learners who have caught up with the lesson.
F. What difficulties did I encounter that my principal or supervisor can help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized materials did I use/discover that I wish to share with other
teachers?
19
20