Get (Ebook) On The Line (Jake Maddox Sports Stories) by Jake Maddox ISBN 9781598892406, 1598892401 PDF Ebook With Full Chapters Now
Get (Ebook) On The Line (Jake Maddox Sports Stories) by Jake Maddox ISBN 9781598892406, 1598892401 PDF Ebook With Full Chapters Now
https://ebooknice.com/product/the-alphabet-of-manliness-10955412
https://ebooknice.com/product/beautiful-disaster-t1-5-mme-
maddox-53577998
https://ebooknice.com/product/maddox-daddies-of-the-shadows-
book-6-48633900
https://ebooknice.com/product/the-parker-sisters-a-border-
kidnapping-49464702
(Ebook) Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA by Brenda Maddox ISBN
9780060985080, 0060985089
https://ebooknice.com/product/rosalind-franklin-the-dark-lady-of-
dna-49997328
https://ebooknice.com/product/religion-and-the-rise-of-
democracy-11885028
https://ebooknice.com/product/vagabond-vol-29-29-37511002
https://ebooknice.com/product/alpha-maddox-wolves-of-chaos-
valley-29353516
https://ebooknice.com/product/mission-black-list-1-1816212
On the Line Jake Maddox Sports Stories Jake Maddox
Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Jake Maddox
ISBN(s): 9781598892406, 1598892401
Edition: Illustrated
File Details: PDF, 22.30 MB
Year: 2006
Language: english
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
his firm was very celebrated. Mr. Drew was a rapid, bold, and
successful operator. His connection with the Erie Railroad,
guaranteeing the paper of that company to the amount of a million
and a-half of dollars, showed the magnitude of his transactions. In
1857, as treasurer of the company, his own paper, endorsed by
Vanderbilt to the amount of a million and a-half of dollars saved the
Erie from bankruptcy. During that year, amidst universal ruin, Mr.
Drew’s losses were immense; but he never flinched, met his paper
promptly, and said that, during all that crisis, he had not lost one
hour’s sleep. In conjunction with Vanderbilt, he relieved the Harlem
Road from its floating debt, and replaced it in a prosperous
condition.
“It would be unpardonable to forget the great Barnum,” says a New
York writer, “one of our most remarkable men. He lives among the
millionaires in a costly brown-stone house in Fifth Avenue, corner of
Thirty-ninth Street, and is a millionaire himself. He has retired from
the details of actual life, though he has the controlling interest of the
Barnum and Van Amburgh Museum. He has made and lost several
fortunes; but, in the evening of life, he is in possession of wealth,
which he expends with great liberality and a genial hospitality. He
was born at Bethel, Connecticut, and was trained in a village tavern
kept by his father. He had a hopeful buoyant disposition, and was
distinguished by his irrepressible love of fun. At the age of fifteen he
began life for himself, and married when he was nineteen. As editor
of the Herald of Freedom, he obtained an American notoriety. The
paper was distinguished for its pith and vigour. Owing to sharp
comments on officials, Mr. Barnum was shut up in gaol. On the day
of his liberation his friends assembled in great force, with carriages,
bands of music, and flags, and carried him home. His first
appearance as an exhibitor was in connection with an old negress,
Joyce Heth, the reputed nurse of Washington. His next attempt was
to obtain possession of Scudder’s American Museum. Barnum had
not five dollars in the world, nor did he pay any down. The concern
was little better than a corpse ready for burial, yet he bound himself
down by terms fearfully stringent, and met all the conditions as they
matured. He secured the person of Charles S. Stretton, the
celebrated dwarf, and exhibited him. He also secured the services of
Jenny land, binding himself to pay her 1,000 dollars a-night for 150
nights, assuming all expenses of every kind. The contract proved an
immense pecuniary success. From the days of Joyce Heth, to the
present time, Mr. Barnum has always had some speciality connected
with his show, which the world pronounces humbug; and Mr.
Barnum does not deny that they are so. Among these are the
Woolly Horse, the Buffalo Hunt, the Ploughing Elephant, the Segal
Mermaid, the What-is-it, and the Gorilla. But Mr. Barnum claims
that, while these special features may not be all that the public
expect, every visitor to the exhibition gets the worth of his money
ten times over; that his million curiosities and monstrosities, giants,
and dwarfs, his menagerie and dramatic entertainments, present a
diversified and immense amount of entertainment that cannot be
secured anywhere else. A large or red baboon, upon a recent
occasion, was exhibited at the Museum. It was advertised as a
living gorilla, the only one ever exhibited in America. Mr. Barnum’s
agents succeeded in hoodwinking the press to such a degree, that
the respectable dailies described the ferocity of this formidable
gorilla, whose rage was represented to be so intense, and his
strength so fearful, that he was very near tearing to pieces the
persons who had brought him from the ship to the Museum.
Barnum had not seen the animal; and when he read the account in
the Post, he was very much excited, and sent immediately to the
men to be careful that no one was harmed. The baboon was about
as furious as a small-sized kitten. The story did its work, and crowds
came to see the wonderful beast. Among others a professor came
from the Smithsonian Institute; he examined the animal, and then
desired to see Mr. Barnum. He informed the proprietor that he had
read the wonderful accounts of the gorilla, and had come to see
him. ‘He is a very fine specimen of the baboon,’ said the professor;
‘but he is no gorilla.’ ‘What’s the reason that he is not a gorilla?’ said
Barnum. The professor replied, that ‘ordinary gorillas had no tails.’
‘I own,’ said the showman, ‘that ordinary gorillas have no tails; but
mine has, and that makes the specimen the more remarkable.’ The
audacity of the reply completely overwhelmed the professor, and he
retired, leaving Mr. Barnum in possession of the field. Mr. Barnum’s
rule has been to give all who patronise him the worth of their
money, without being particular as to the means by which he
attracts the crowds to his exhibitions. His aim has been notoriety.
He offered the Atlantic Telegraph Company 5,000 dollars for the
privilege of first sending twenty words over the wires. It has not
been all sunshine with Mr. Barnum. His imposing villa at Bridgeport
was burned to the ground. Anxious to build up East Bridgeport, he
became responsible to a manufacturing company, and his fortune
was swept away in an hour; but with wonderful sagacity he relieved
himself. As a business man, he has singular executive force, and
great capacity. Men who regard Mr. Barnum as a charlatan, who
attribute his success to what he calls humbug, clap-trap,
exaggerated pictures, and puffing advertisements, will find that the
secret of his success did not lie in that direction. Under all his
eccentricity, there was a business energy, tact, perseverance,
shrewdness, and industry, without which, all his humbugging would
have been exerted in vain. From distributing Sear’s Bible, he
became lessee of the Vauxhall Saloon; thence a writer of
advertisements for an amphitheatre at four dollars a-week; then
negotiating, without a dollar, for the Museum, which was utterly
worthless; outwitting a corporation who intended to outwit him on
the purchase of the Museum over his head; exhibiting a
manufactured mermaid which he had bought of a Boston showman;
palming off Tom Thumb as eleven years of age when he was but
five; showing his woolly horse, and exhibiting his wild buffaloes at
Holcken—these, and other small things that Barnum did, are known
to the public; but there are other things which the public did not
know. Barnum was thoroughly honest, and he kept his business
engagements to the letter. He adopted the most rigid economy.
Finding a hearty coadjutor in his wife, he put his family on a short
allowance, and shared himself in the economy of the household. Six
hundred dollars a-year he allowed for the expenses of his family, and
his wife resolutely resolved to reduce that sum to 400 dollars. Six
months after the purchase of the Museum, the owner came into the
ticket-office at noon; Barnum was eating his frugal dinner, which was
spread before him. ‘Is this the way you eat your dinner?’ the
proprietor inquired. Barnum said, ‘I have not eaten a warm dinner
since I bought the Museum, except on the Sabbath, and I intend
never to eat another on a week-day till I am out of debt.’ ‘Ah, you
are safe, and will pay for the Museum before the year is out,’ replied
the owner. In less than a year the Museum was paid for out of the
profits of the establishment.”
There are no better rules for business success than those laid down
by Mr. Barnum, and which have guided his course. Among them are
these—“Select the kind of business suited to your temperament and
inclination; let your pledged word ever be sacred; whatever you do,
do with all your might; use no description of intoxicating drinks; let
hope predominate, but do not be visionary; pursue one thing at a
time; do not scatter your powers; engage proper assistance; live
within your income, if you almost starve; depend upon yourself, and
not upon others.”
Perhaps one of the men who made most money by advertising, was
Mr. Barnes, the proprietor of the New York Ledger. The manner was
entirely his own. When he startled the public by taking columns of a
daily journal, or one entire side, he secured the end he had in view.
His method of repeating three or four lines—such as, “Jenny Jones
writes only for the Ledger!” or “Read Mrs. Southwort’s new story in
the Ledger!”—and this repeated over and over again, till men turned
from it in disgust, and did not conceal their ill-temper—was a system
of itself. “What is the use,” said a man to Mr. Barnes, “of your taking
the whole side of the Herald, and repeating that statement a
thousand times?” “Would you have asked me that question,” replied
Mr. Barnes, “if I had inserted it but once? I put it in to attract your
attention, and to make you ask that question.” This mode of
advertising was new, and it excited both astonishment and ridicule.
His ruin was predicted over and over again; and when he had thus
amassed a fine fortune, it was felt that the position he had secured
was the one he aimed at when he was a mere printer’s lad. He
sought for no short paths to success; he mastered his trade as a
printer patiently and perfectly; he earned his money before he spent
it; in New York he was preferred because he did his work better than
others; he was truthful, sober, honest, and industrious; if he took a
job, he finished it at the time and in the manner agreed upon. He
borrowed no money, incurred no debts, and suffered no
embarrassments. He was born in the north of Ireland, not far from
Londonderry, and was true to the Scotch Presbyterian blood in his
veins.
I now come to the most illustrious name, as regards money-getters,
either in England or America. Mr. George Peabody was something
more than a money-hunter, and, in the history of money-making
men, deserves the post of honour for his philanthropy. He was born
in Massachusetts, and was, essentially, a self-taught and self-made
man. After he had learnt, in the district school, how to read and
write, having been four years in a grocer’s score, and having spent
another year with his grandfather in rustic life in Vermont, he went
to join his brother David, who had set up a drapery or dry-goods
store at Newburyport. This was stopped, a few months after, by a
fire, which destroyed Peabody’s shop and most of the other houses
in the town. Fortunately, at this juncture, an uncle, who had settled
in George Town, in the district of Columbia, invited young George to
become his commercial assistant; and he stayed with him a couple
of years, managing the most part of the business. In May, 1812,
during the unhappy war between Great Britain and America, when a
British fleet came up the Potomac, this young merchant’s clerk, with
others of his time, volunteered into the patriot army, and served a
few months in the defence of Port Warburton, as a true citizen
soldier. The short war being over, his proved skill and diligence
brought him the offer of a partnership in a new concern—it was that
of Elisha Riggs, who was about to commence the sale of dry goods
throughout the middle States of the Union. Riggs found the capital,
while Peabody did the work, and the firm at once achieved immense
success. Peabody acted as bagsman, and often travelled alone, on
horseback, through the western wilds of New York and Pennsylvania,
or the plantations of Maryland and Virginia, if not farther, lodging
with farmers or gentlemen slave-owners, and so becoming
acquainted with every class of people, and every way of living:
indeed, so fast did the Southern connection increase, that the house
was removed to Baltimore, though its branches were established,
seven years later, at Philadelphia and New York. About the year
1830, Mr. Riggs having retired from business, Mr. Peabody found
himself at the head of one of the largest mercantile firms in the
home-trade of America. But Mr. Peabody had also, by this time,
distinguished himself as a man of superior integrity, discretion, and
public spirit. “He coveted no political office; he courted the votes of
no party; he waited upon no caucus; put his foot down,” says the
writer of the account of his life in the “Annual Register,” “upon no
platform; but held aloof from the strife of American factions.” His
first visit to London was in 1827, whole he was still chief partner in
the Baltimore firm. In 1843, he fixed himself here, as merchant and
money-broker, with others, by the style of “George Peabody and Co.,
of Warnford Court, City.” As one of the three commissioners
appointed by the State of Maryland to obtain means for restoring its
credit, he refused to be paid for his services; but the State could not
do less than vote him their special thanks. To the last he retained
his fondness for his native land, and used to celebrate the
anniversary of American Independence, on the 4th of July, with a
kind of public dinner at the Crystal Palace.
It is as a magnificent giver as well as getter of money that Mr.
Peabody has become famous. He knew perfectly well what he was
about. He had seen as much of the world as most elderly men of
business accustomed to society and travel, and he had come to the
conclusion that a man was not made happy by fine houses, and
grand equipages, and stately parks, and galleries filled with the
choicest productions of art in ancient or modern times, or by the
social status which assuredly the possession of money gives. None
of these things, he found, made a man happy; though if he had
them, and were deprived of them, the loss would make him truly
unhappy indeed. Mr. Peabody thought he knew a surer way to the
possession of happiness; and that was, by dedicating the wealth he
had honourably acquired, to the promotion of the well-being of his
less fortunate fellow-men.
Some of his first acts of pecuniary munificence, as was to be
expected, had an American bearing. At the time of the Great
Exhibition of 1851, he promptly supplied the sum needed to pay for
the arrangements of the United States contributions. In the
following year he joined Mr. Henry Grinnell, of New York, shipowner,
in fitting out the expedition to the Arctic Sea in search of Sir John
Franklin. In the same year he bestowed a large donation, since
augmented to £100,000, to found a free library and educational
institute at Danvers, his native place. In 1857, he revisited his
native land, after an absence of twenty years. On this occasion he
gave £100,000 to form, at Baltimore, a noble institute devoted to
science and art, in conjunction with a free public library. The corner-
stone of this building was laid in 1858, and the structure was then
completed; but its opening was delayed by the civil war which at
that time prevailed. It was not till after the conclusion of the war
that it was finally dedicated to the purposes for which it was
founded. Mr. Peabody afterwards gave a second £100,000 to the
institute.
In 1862, Mr. Peabody made the magnificent donation of £150,000
for the amelioration of the condition of the poor of London, and the
trustees, who were men of mark and position, immediately
employed the money in accordance with the noble donor’s wishes, in
the erection of model dwellings for working-men. In 1866, he added
another £100,000 to the fund; and in 1868, he made a further
donation of about fifteen acres of land at Brixton, 5,642 shares in
the Hudson’s Bay Company, and £5,405 in cash (altogether another
£100,000); thus making the value of his gifts to the poor of London
as much as £350,000. By the last will and testament of Mr. Peabody,
opened on the day of his funeral, his executors, Sir Curtis Sampson
and Sir Charles Reed, were directed to apply a further sum of
£150,000 to the Peabody Fund, thus making a sum of half a million
sterling so employed.
This extraordinary beneficence, on the part of a private citizen, was
acknowledged in Great Britain. The freedom of the City of London
was conferred on Mr. Peabody by the corporation. The Queen, not
content with offering him either a baronetcy or the Grand Cross of
the Bath, which he respectfully declined, wrote him a grateful letter,
and invited him to visit her at Windsor. In 1866, just before his
second visit to his native country, he received from her the gift of a
beautiful miniature portrait of herself, framed in the most costly
style, which he deposited in the Peabody Institute at Danvers. The
last token of public honour which was rendered to Mr. Peabody
before his death, was the uncovering, by the Prince of Wales, of
Storey’s fine bronze statue of himself behind the Royal Exchange.
Mr. Peabody remained in his native land three years, during which
time he largely increased the amount of his donations, and founded
more than one or two important institutions. He gave 2,000,000
dollars for the education of the blacks and whites in the South;
300,000 dollars for museums of American relics at Yale and Harvard
Colleges; 50,000 dollars for a free museum at Salem; 25,000 dollars
to Bishop McIlxame for Kenyon College; and presented a sum of
230,000 dollars to the State of Maryland. He also expended 100,000
dollars on a memorial church to his mother, and distributed among
the members of his family 2,000,000 dollars. In recognition of his
many large gifts to public institutions in America, Mr. Peabody
received, in March 1867, a special vote of thanks from the United
States. He died in London, at the house of his friend, Six Curtis
Sampson, at Eaton Square, in the seventy-filth year of his age. The
funeral took place in Westminster Abbey though, in accordance with
the wishes of the deceased, the body was afterwards conveyed to
America. The coffin-lid bore the following inscription:—
George Peabody,
Born at Danvers, Massachusetts, February 18th, 1795;
Died in London, England, November 4th, 1869.
The remains were taken over to America in her Majesty’s turret-
ship, the Monarch.
The late Mr. A. T. Stewart, dry-goods merchant of New York, has left
a curious monument of his administrative skill in the great Working
Women’s Hotel, recently completed in that city. As a large employer
of labour, male as well as female, Mr. Stewart became impressed
with the difficulty that working-folk have in finding lodgings even in
comparatively new cities. In swiftly-growing New York, the
constantly increasing demand for business premises has pushed the
population higher and higher up the island, until one fashionable
street after another has been converted into stores and offices, and
people fairly well off have built themselves handsome dwellings
further afield. This has been by no means an unprofitable change
for house-owners; for the compensation received for a house “down
town,” more than suffices to build and furnish a handsome dwelling
in that part of the city still devoted to private residences; but to the
poorer classes of inhabitants, rapid change and development of this
kind have been not a little oppressive. Far more swiftly and
suddenly than in London, the working-people have found themselves
thrust from the space previously occupied by them, but grown too
valuable to be covered by their humble homes. Like their brethren
in London, they have either retired to the suburbs and find a
tiresome morning and evening journey added to the miseries of life,
or have taken refuge in large houses let out in tenements and built
expressly for the accommodation of artisan families. Both English
and American experiments in this latter direction have been very
successful. Practice has taught the proper principle of constructing
large tenement houses as well as artisans’ and labourers’ cottages,
and the working family is probably not less commodiously, and is
certainly more healthily, lodged than it has been at any preceding
period. The single man, too, is cared for; but the single woman has
hitherto been under certain disadvantages. It is obvious that a
house almost always contains more space than she wants, and costs
more money than she can afford; and it is equally clear that in
cooking her own meals separately she is wasting time, food, and
fuel. Some of these objections might, perhaps, be got over by four
or five women clubbing together; but their general feeling has never
been strongly manifested in favour of divided rule or responsibility.
It is subjecting human nature to a severe test to ask people to
“room together,” as it is called in America, the ordinary result being
that the temporary “chums” never speak again to each other for the
rest of their lives. It was to obviate this strain on human sympathy
that Mr. Stewart projected the Working Women’s Hotel, the
completion of which he did not live to see.
“Judging from the prices charged,” says a writer in the Daily News,
“and the regulations enforced, the working women for whom the
great hotel at New York has been constructed, are of a class
somewhat above that of the factory or work-girl proper. Seven
dollars a-week for board and a separate room, or six dollars a-head
if two persons occupy the same room, is a price that would absorb
an ordinary workwoman’s entire earnings. When it is recollected
that the value of a paper dollar is now within a fraction of that of a
gold one, and that wages and other things have fallen in price with
the contraction of the currency since the civil war, it is not easy to
see from what class of actual workwomen the hotel is to draw its
customers. Women working at trades clearly cannot aspire to the
comforts provided for seven dollars a-week, and it is doubtful
whether those in a position to pay that sum will submit to the
restrictions imposed upon boarders. For the sum asked they can, at
the present moment, obtain board easily elsewhere, and enjoy
perfect liberty. It is very likely that the food and accommodation
provided at the hotel are much superior to those offered at the
smaller boarding-houses with which the outer edges of New York,
Brooklyn, and Jersey City are thickly studded; but mere eating and
sleeping seem to be regarded by women, in America at least, in a
far less serious light than by men. The code of regulations at the
Working Women’s Hotel affords an amusing instance of the severity
which comes over the American when called to the lofty and
important position of keeping an hotel. In other walks of life he is
easy and good-natured, but when impelled by destiny to ‘run’ an
hotel, he undergoes a sudden transformation into a despot. The
guests at the new hotel are informed that eight large parlours have
been provided for the reception of visitors, who will not be allowed
in other rooms or parlours except by express permission of the
manager. The eight parlours specified correspond, in fact, to the
strangers’ rooms at a club. It is furthermore provided that no
visiting to a room will be allowed except by consent of all the
occupants; that no washing of clothes will be permitted in the
rooms, and that no sewing-machines or working apparatus shall be
brought into them. This last regulation may appear severe, but it is
probably intended to protect those who do not sew from
annoyance. A sewing-machine is an unpleasant neighbour, it is true;
but so is a rocking-chair; yet it may be doubted whether even the
despot who reigns over this last new ‘institution’ will prove equal to
the task of tabooing that pestilent article of furniture. Animals will
be rigidly excluded. No dogs, cats, birds, or other pet creatures will
be suffered; meals will be served at fixed hours; the gas will be
turned off and the hotel closed at half-past eleven. Whether this
code will be submitted to by American working-women capable of
paying from 24s. to 28s. weekly for board and lodging remains to be
seen. The upper lady-clerk in a store is, as a rule, gifted with great
strength of character, and as a fairly educated, self-reliant, and
hardworking member of society, is perfectly entitled to display her
sense of independence. She will be quick to perceive the
advantages offered by the new hotel, but it is at least probable that
she will be equally quick to resent the restrictions which it is sought
to impose upon her sovereign will and pleasure.”
A poor rich man, not long since, died at Cincinnati, leaving property
worth considerably more than half a million sterling. He lived up an
alley in one small room, dressed in rags, and looked like a penniless
tramp, and yet he owned more than 100,000 acres of land. Another
citizen of Cincinnati also offered to present to the city his valuable
art-collection, worth £40,000, on condition that a fire-proof building
should be erected in which to store it.
It is said that Peter Cooper, of New York, who has now (1878)
entered his eighty-eighth year, is worth £2,000,000. He began life
as a coachmaker’s apprentice; but having invented a superior kind of
glue, which came into general use, he rapidly made an immense
fortune.
The last illustration of getting on in America may be found in the
case of Carl Schurz, now (1878) one of the Secretaries of State in
America.
The history of Carl Schurz reads like a romance, for the wandering
Ulysses himself, restricted to narrower limits by the imperfect
geographical knowledge of his day, never had a tenth part of his
modern imitator’s advantages in “observant straying” over different
lands, and amidst diverse languages, nor “noting the manners and
their climes” of widely separated races. Born near Cologne in 1829,
and educated first at its gymnasium, and subsequently at the
University of Bonn, Carl Schurz enjoyed superior educational
advantages, by which, naturally studious, he greatly profited. When
but nineteen years of age, under the influence of his professor,
Kinkel, he became a Revolutionist in his sentiments; and in the year
1848, memorable for the revolutionary tide that swept over Europe,
established, in conjunction with his professor, a journal to advocate
those principles. Of this journal he was for a time sole editor.
When, in, the spring of 1849, the abortive insurrectionary effort was
made at Bonn, in which both he and the professor took a part, they
fled together to the Palatinate. Here our young student joined the
revolutionary army as adjutant, and aided in the defence of Rastadt
against the government troops. On the surrender of that place he
escaped to Switzerland, but soon returned to deliver his friend
Professor Kinkel from the fortress of Spandau. In this effort he was
successful. In 1851, we find the young revolutionist at Paris, as
correspondent of German journals, and a little later at London, for a
year giving lessons in German. But the exile wearied of Europe, and
his fancy drove him to America, where he arrived ignorant of the
language, and, it is to be presumed, short of cash. But he
proceeded to grapple resolutely with both difficulties. Three years
he spent in the quiet Quaker city of Philadelphia, teaching, and
learning, and writing—for there is a large German population In
Pennsylvania. Then he drifted westwards; first to Wisconsin, where
he commenced his career as a political partisan making speeches in
German, during the presidential canvass of 1856, on the Republican
side. He was also an unsuccessful candidate for the lieutenant-
governorship of Wisconsin that year—fast work for one but four
years in the country. The first public speech he delivered in the
English language was in 1858, about which time he commenced the
practice of law. In 1859, he made a lecture tour through the New
England States, speaking English, as I have been informed by an
auditor, very imperfectly. Now he speaks the language with perfect
purity, and a scarcely perceptible accent. In 1860, he was an
influential member of the National Republican Convention, and one
of the chief speakers during the canvass that resulted in the election
of Lincoln to the presidency. Appointed by Mr. Lincoln minister to
Spain, he soon resigned that office to return home and take part in
the civil war—the Germans forming a large portion of the military
contingent in the Federal army, the great bulk of the German
immigration having settled in the North and North-western States;
very few indeed at the South. It was a curious sequel to a
revolutionary career at home that Mr. Schurz should have been so
soon engaged in suppressing a rebellion in his adopted country. He
rose to the rank of major-general in the Federal service, and took
part in the battle of the second Bull Run, and where Stonewall
Jackson defeated the Federals at Chancellorsville. He was also at
Chattanooga and Gettysburg fights. At the close of the war he
returned to the practice of the law, and connected himself with the
newspaper press in different parts of the country as a Washington
correspondent.
When, in 1866, after the assassination of President Lincoln, Andrew
Johnson was acting President of the United States, he appointed Carl
Schurz as special commissioner to visit and report on the actual
condition of the southern country, then under process of
reconstruction. On his return from this mission our German Ulysses
migrated to Detroit in Michigan, where he founded a newspaper.
The ensuing year he moved again to the city of St. Louis, in
Missouri, where he founded a German newspaper, took an active
part for General Grant in both languages in 1868, and in 1869 was
elected United States senator for six years’ term from Missouri.
Disagreeing with General Grant’s policy and mode of conducting
public affairs, Mr. Schurz passed over to the Opposition to his
administration, and, in conjunction with Horace Greeley—like himself
an Abolitionist and Republican—sought to establish a reform party of
Liberal Republicans, as opposed to the Spoils party of Grant. Mr.
Schurz was the presiding officer in the Cincinnati Republican
Convention, which nominated Horace Greeley for the presidency, and
since then his career has been one of unmitigated success.
In the new States, as well as in the old, these American money-
makers flourish. As I write, I hear that Mark Hopkins, the great
Californian railway millionaire, has died with upwards of £3,000,000,
and his will cannot be found. In the absence of a will his widow
takes two-thirds of the fortune, and his two brothers the remainder.
Money-making, it may be said, is the chief characteristic of Brother
Jonathan and his numerous and pushing tribe.
CHAPTER III.
CHARLES BIANCONI, THE IRISH CAR-MAN .
In his way, Mr. Bianconi was a religious man. He and his priest were
always on good terms. He did not run his cars on a Sunday,
because the Irish, being a religious people, will not travel for
business on that day. He also found his horses worked better for
one day’s rest in seven. With Daniel O’Connell he was on the most
intimate terms, and Sheil was often a guest at his house. He was an
out-and-out Liberal, and always maintained that when the Tory
landlords saw that they would fail to get one of their own party into
parliament, they encouraged their tenants to vote for the Home Rule
nominee, in the hope of balking the steady-going Liberal who could
afford to be honest. “I have known,” writes Mrs. O’Connell, “a great
Protestant land-owner boast of having given tacit support to the
ultra-Liberal candidate, in the pious hope that he could thereby
cause mischief in the Liberal benches.”
It is not pleasant to read that Bianconi, true friend to Ireland as he
was, narrowly escaped the penalty too generally attached to
ownership of land in Ireland. It was said that he was marked out to
be shot!—it was even thought that the deed had been planned and
attempted, and frustrated only by the parish priest, who asked him
to take a seat in his gig on his way home from Cashel. Bianconi had
driven in from Longfield in his own carriage, but he accepted the
priest’s invitation and went back with him. It seems there are two
roads leading from Cashel towards Longfield House, and the priest
chose the longer of the two. “Why do you take this road?” said
Bianconi. “I prefer it,” replied the priest, and nothing more was said
about it then; but it was suspected that the old priest had heard
something, or got some warning, for it afterwards became known
that a party of men had that night been watching on the other
road. Happily for the credit of Ireland, Bianconi expired peacefully in
1873, at a ripe old age, as is manifest when we state that he was
born in 1786. One of his last acts was characteristic. Struck with
paralysis, he discovered, about a week before his death an error of
eightpence in the deduction for poor-rates out of a large rent
cheque. Verily, of such is the kingdom of Mammon. Mrs. O’Connell,
however, has done her best to make her father’s memory fragrant;
but she is a novice in the art of book-making, and we must take the
will for the deed. Let us hope her countrymen will study the
example she holds out to them of a man industrious, and careful,
and economical, and eager for the main chance. It is such men
Ireland needs far more than agitators for Home Rule. In the
colonies no one learns more readily the value of thrift than the
Irishman, or gives us a finer example of how to reap the golden
harvest which it ensures; but in his native land the Irishman loves
more to spend money than earn it. Sir Thomas Dargan, the great
railway contractor, was, however, one of those exceptions which
teach us how, even in his native land, the poorest Irishman may
amass a fortune. Young Dargan received a good education, and
after leaving school was placed in a surveyor’s office. With little
beyond this training, and a character for the strictest integrity, he left
Ireland to push his fortunes. His first employment was under
Telford, who was then engaged in constructing the Holyhead Road.
When this was completed Dargan returned to Ireland, and embarked
in several minor undertakings, in which he was fortunate enough to
gain sufficient to form the nucleus of that princely fortune which
entitled him to the appellation of a millionaire. After the highly
successful result of the Great Exhibition of 1851, Mr. Dargan, with
the view of developing the industrial resources of his native country,
and with a munificence certainly without parallel in one who had
been “the architect of his own fortune,” resolved on founding an
Industrial Exhibition in Dublin, and placed £20,000 in the hands of a
committee, consisting of the leading citizens, and empowered them
to erect a building, and to defray all the necessary expenses
connected with the undertaking, on the sole condition that no
begging-box should be handed found for further contributions. He
undertook, moreover, to advance whatever additional sums might be
required to carry the enterprise to a successful issue. In fact, before
the Exhibition opened (May 12, 1853), Mr. Dargan’s advances are
said not to have fallen far short of £100,000.
CHAPTER IV.
A FORTUNE MADE BY A VEGETARIAN.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com