Route_to_Chaos_in_Generalized_Logistic_Map
Route_to_Chaos_in_Generalized_Logistic_Map
net/publication/271771394
CITATIONS READS
4 428
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ewa Rak on 13 April 2015.
R. Rak1 , E. Rak1
arXiv:1502.00248v1 [nlin.CD] 1 Feb 2015
1
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszów,
PL–35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
x ∈ [0, 1], (p, q) > 0, n = 0, 1, 2, ..., where the two new parameters p and
q may assume any positive values. The standard logistic map thus corre-
sponds to the case p = q = 1. For such a generalized equation we illustrate
the character of the transition from regularity to chaos as a function of r
for the whole spectrum of p and q parameters. As an example we consider
the case for p = 1 and q = 2 both in the periodic and chaotic regime. We
focus on the character of the corresponding bifurcation sequence and on
the quantitative nature of the resulting attractor as well as its universal
attribute (Feigenbaum constant).
1. Introduction
Since the dawn time the chaos is an indispensable part of human life.
One of the most famous models with chaotic behavior is the logistic map.
Its simple analytic form meant that it was used in many scientific disciplines
such as biology, cryptography, communication chemical physics and stock
market [1, 2, 3, 4]. One of the mathematical models of chaos was discovered
by Mitchell Feigenbaum (1978) [5, 6, 7, 8]. Feigenbaum considered ordinary
difference equations used for example in biology to describe the development
of population in its dependence on time. He discovered that population
oscillates in time between stable powers (fixed points), the number of which
doubles according to changes in the power of external parameter. The
generalization of the Feigenbaum model contains all first-order difference
equations f (xn ) = xn+1 . The condition for the existence of chaos is the
single maximum of a function f (xn ). Feigenbaum also proved that the
transition to chaos is described by two universal constans α and δ, later
(1)
2 route˙to˙cahaos˙fens2014˙revised˙rak printed on February 9, 2015
is one of the most simple forms of a chaotic process. Basically, this map, like
any one-dimensional map, is a rule for getting a number from a number.
The parameter r is fixed, but if one studies the map for different values
of r (up to 4, else the unit interval is no longer invariant) it is found that
r is the catalyst for chaos. After many iterations x reaches some values
independent of its starting value 3 regimes: r < 1 : x = 0 for large n,
1 < r < 3 : x = constant for large n, 3 < r < r∞ : cyclic behavior, where
r∞ ≈ 3.56, r∞ < r ≤ 4 : mostly chaotic,
An interesting thing happens if a value of r greater than 3 is chosen. The
route˙to˙cahaos˙fens2014˙revised˙rak printed on February 9, 2015 3
map becomes unstable and we get a pitchfork bifurcation with two stable
orbits of period two corresponding to the two stable fixed points of the sec-
ond iteration of f . With r slightly bigger than 3.54, the population will
oscillate between 8 values, then 16, 32, etc. The lengths of the parame-
ter intervals which yield the same number of oscillations decrease rapidly;
the ratio between the lengths of two successive such bifurcation intervals
approaches the F eigenbaum constant δ = 4.669.... The period doubling
bifurcations come faster and faster ( 8, 16, 32, ...), then suddenly break off.
Beyond a certain point, known as the accumulation point r∞ , periodicity
gives way to chaos. In the middle of the complexity, a window suddenly
appears with a regular period like 3 or √ 7 as a result of mode locking. The
3-period bifurcation occurs at r = 1 + 2 2, and period doubling then begin
again with cycles of 6,12,... and 7,14,28,... and then once again break off to
chaos.
For the first time the function (3) has been presented in [14]. The max-
1/q
p ′
imum of the function (3) is reached for x = p+q , because fr (x) =
1/q
′ p
r(pxp−1 − (p + q)xp+q−1 ) and fr (x) = 0 ⇔ x = p+q , ℜ ∋ (p, q) > 0.
p
!
1 p p+q q
p q ( ) (p+q)
= rqp p+q and for r ∈ 0, p q
q
It results that fr p+q where
(p+q) q
p
!
( p+q
p
) q (p+q)
0, q = rmax function fr is f ([0, 1]) ⊂ [0, 1].
p 100 rmax
1 10
20
8
rmax 10 6
5 4
1
1 2
k
q 100 2 4 6 8
For the sake of parameters p and q the function (3) generates a lot of
new functions which can be analyzed using mathematical methods, just like
for a logistic map, thus obtaining very interesting results.
a) Let us assume that k = qp and k > 0. Then r is depend on the value k
k+1
(k+1) k
and r ∈ 0, k .
b) If k = 1, then p = q and rmax is independent on p, q and rmax = 4
always - for logistic map, we have p = q = 1 and rmax = 4.
k+1
(k+1) k
c) If k → ∞, then rmax → 1, because limk→∞ k = 1.
k+1
(k+1) k
d) If k → 0+ , then rmax → ∞, because limk→∞ k = +∞.
e) Now let us consider a case, when p = 1 and q > 0. Then we have
x 1
0.8
1
0.5
ã
0.2
0.75
rmax xH1-xq L 0.5
0.25
10
20
q 30
In the following part of this paper we will show that the Feigenbaum
model of transition to chaos is correct for representation (4) for given pos-
itive values of parameters p and q. Therefore, we will study the dynamics
of this map in the case of p = 1 and q = 2. Then the representation (5)
assumes the following form:
q
r−1
ris an attractive fixed point for r ∈ (1, 2).
Change
√ r from 1 to 2 has caused the migration of the attractive point from
0 to 22 .
Conclusion 1.
For 1 < r < 2 there exists
q a stable fixed point attracting all points. When
r = r1 = 2, then |fr ( r−1
′
r )| = |3 − 2r| = 1 and this point stops being an
attractive point.
(2)
3) For r = r2 ≥ 2 we will look into the stability of fixed points fr and fr
of the map (5) as a function of parameter r, because the Feigenbaum model
is generated by bifurcations connected with iterations of a function.
(2)
r 2 x − r 2 x3 −
Let us consider the second iteration of fr , namely fr (x) = q
r 4 x3 + 3r 4 x5 − 3r 4 x7 + r 4 x9 , with fixed points: x1 = 0, x2 = r−1 r , x3 =
q √ q √ ′
1 r 2 −4 1 r 2 −4 (2)
2 − 2r , x4 = 2 + 2r . Because fr (x) = r 2 − 3r 2 x2 − 3r 4 x2 +
′ (2) ′ (2)
15r 4 x4 − 21r 4 x6 + 9r 4 x8 we have fr (x1 ) = r 2 , fr (x2 ) = (3 − 2r)2 ,
′ (2) ′ (2) √
fr (x3 ) = fr (x4 ) = 9 − 2r 2 whereas for 2 < r2 < 5 fixed points x3
and x4 are attractive points according to condition in Theorem 1 .
Conclusion 2. q
(1) (2)
The fixed point x = r−1 r of fr is also the fixed point of fr as well as of
all higher iterations.
Conclusion 3.
(1)
If the fixed point of fr becomes unstable, then it is also the unstable fixed
(2)
point of fr and of all next iterations.
′ ′ ′ ′
From the inequality |f (s)| > 1 we have |f (2) (s)| = |f [f (s)]f (s)| =
′
|f (s)| > 1.
√ (2)
If 5 < r3 < r4 , then the fixed points of fr become repulsive at the same
time. Following this instability, the fourth iteration shows two new pitchfork
bifurcations giving cycle 22 order for four attractive fixed points, which is
called period duplication.
To generalize the above examples we get:
a) For rn−1 < r < rn there exists a stable cycle 2n−1 , whose elements
x0 , x1 , x2 , x3 , ..., x2n−1 −1 are defined by the following connections:
n−1
Y ′
fr (xi ) = xi+1 , fr2 (xi ) = xi , | fr (xi )| < 1
i
√ √
Proof. Let us assume that rn−1 = a. Then rn = 3 + rp n−1 = 3 + a,
√ p √ rn −rn−1 √
rn+1 = 3 + rn = 3 + 3 + a and δ = limn→∞ rn+1 −rn = 14 + 2 13 ≈
4.61.
A table of 2n cycles type and values of rn is given below. It is clearly vis-
ible that doubling bifurcations come faster and faster (8, 16, 32, ...) and
suddenly break off beyond a certain point known as the accumulation point
and periodicity gives way to chaos.
n 1 2 3 4 5 … 11 12 … ∞
n
2 cycle 2 4 8 16 32 … 2048 4096 … accum. point
Table 1: The algebraic orders of the values of rn for n = 1, 2, ... are given
by 1, 2, 4, 8, ....
√
3 3
xn+1 = xn (1 − x2n ) ≡ frmax (xn ), (7)
2
8 route˙to˙cahaos˙fens2014˙revised˙rak printed on February 9, 2015
Fig. 3: Iterates of map (6) strting from x0 = 0.99. Left: In the stable 3-cycle
region for r = rc ; Right: In the chaotic region for r = rc − ∆r, ∆r = 0.001
.
1
3
p
1 −y0 + −1 + y0 2
xn = arccos( 1 + √ ).
√ 3
2 3
p
3 −y0 + −1 + y0
The invariant density function ρ 3√3 (x) of f 3√3 (x) can be calculated using
2 2
the following definition:
N −1 N −1
1 X 1 X
lim δ (x − xn ) = lim δ (x − g(yn )) (9)
N →∞ N N →∞ N
n=0 n=0
R1
Using ρ(y) = 1, (9) becomes: ρ 3√3 (x) = 0 dyρ(y)δ[x − h(y)]
2
route˙to˙cahaos˙fens2014˙revised˙rak printed on February 9, 2015 9
i.e.
√ 2/3
x2 − 1 − x −1
ρ 3√3 (x) = s .
2 √ p
3
√ √ 2/3
1
3 x2 − 1 x2 − 1 − x − x2 − 1 − x − √ 2/3 +1
( x2 −1−x)
(10)
The above function is shown in Fig.4.
ΡHxL
x
0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1
√
3 3
Fig. 4: The invariant density function of map (6) for r = rmax = Left: 2 .
An analytical form represented by the equation (10). Right: Numerical
simulation - the histogram for 50000 iterations.
Fig. 5: The set of attraction for representation (6) [60000 iterations]: a) for
r = rmax (red), r = 2.56(blue), r = 2.53(green), r = 2.45(orange); b) for
r = rmax (red), r = 2.42(black), r = 2.4(blue).
n−1
1X
λ(x0 ) = lim ln |f ′ (xi )|, (11)
n→∞ n
i=0
1.0
0.5
x,Λ
0.0
-0.5
3. Summary
Currently, modeling real-world systems is very popular. A well-known
model that takes into account the deterministic chaos is the logistic map.
However, this one-dimensional map can be controlled only by one parameter.
In the present contribution, we postulate a generalization of the classical
logistic map which is generally controlled by three parameters. This could
allow to adapt to the conditions prevailing in the modeled system.
We focus on the rmax parameter (depending on p and q) which is re-
sponsible for the dynamics of the system - among others shown that if p = q
then rmax = 4.
As an example, we carry out analytical and quantitative analysis in the
case where p = 1 and q = 2 both in the periodic and chaotic regime where
the Lyapunov exponent has positive values. It turns out that the dynamics
of this equation is faster than in the case of the logistic map - the value of
the parameter rmax ≈ 2.3 is less than the value of rmax = 4 for the logistic
map. In the periodic regime we identified Feigenbaum constant δ which is
typical for all dissipative systems (also for the logistic map). For chaotic
area we have found an analytical form of the invariant density function. For
both regimes we have proposed specific form of data representation which
allowed to obtain a non-trivial structure of an attractor set.
Footnotes
This work was partially supported by the Centre for Innovation and Transfer
of Natural Sciences and Engineering Knowledge (University of Rzeszow).
12route˙to˙cahaos˙fens2014˙revised˙rak printed on February 9, 2015
REFERENCES
[1] N.K. Pareeka, Vinod Patidara, K.K. Sud, Image encryption using chaotic lo-
gistic map, Image and Vision Computing, 24, 926-934, (2006).
[2] A. Ferrettia, N.K. Rahman, A study of coupled logistic map and its applications
in chemical physics, Chemical Physics, 119, 275-288, (1988).
[3] C. Pellicer-Lostao, R. Lpez-Ruiz A chaotic gas-like model for trading markets,
Journal of Computational Science, 1, 2432, (2010).
[4] M. Andrecut, Logistic map as a random number generator, Int. J. Modern Phys.
B, 12, 921930, (1998).
[5] M.J. Feigenbaum, The Metric Universal Properties of Period Doubling Bifurca-
tions and the Spectrum for a Route to Turbulence, NewYork. Acad. Sci., 330-336,
(1980).
[6] M.J. Feigenbaum, Quantitative Universality for a Class of Non-Linear Trans-
formations, Stat. Phys., 25-52, (1978).
[7] C.J. Thompson, J. B. McGuire, Asymptotic and Essentially Singular Solutions
of the Feigenbaum Equation, J. Stat. Phys. 51, 991-1007, (1988).
[8] J.W. Stephenson, Y. Wang, Numerical Solution of Feigenbaum’s Equation,
Appl. Math. Notes 15, 68-78, (1990).
[9] J. Smital, On Functions and Functional Equations, IOP Publishing Ltd, Bristol
1998.
[10] T. Li, J.A. Yorke, Period three implies chaos, Amer. Math., 985-992, (1975).
[11] Pierre-Franois Verhulst, Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son
accroissement, Correspondance mathmatique et physique, 113121, (1838).
[12] E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems, Cambridge University Press, (1993).
[13] H.G. Schuster, Deterministic chaos: an introduction, Weinheim, (1988).
[14] R. Rak, S. Drożdż (supervisor), Modeling of population growth, masters thesis,
University of Rzeszów, (2003).
[15] A. Lyapunov, Problem general de la stabilite du mouvement, Ann Math Stud
17, (1949).
[16] A. Wolf, J.B. Swift, H.L. Swinney, J.A. Vastano, Determining Lyapunov Ex-
ponents from a Time Series, Physica D, 16, 285-317, (1985).
[17] M.A. Van Wzk, W. STEEB, Kluwer Academic Publishing, (1997).
[18] S.H. Strogatz, Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics,
biology, chemistry, and engineering, Addison-Wesley, New York, (1994).
[19] A.H. Nayfeh, B. Balachandran, Applied nonlinear dynamics: analytical, com-
putational, and experimental methods, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1995).
[20] P. Bryant, R. Brown, H. Abarbanel, Lyapunov exponents from observed time
series, Physical Review Letters 65, (1990).