Constitutional Development PMF IAS
Constitutional Development PMF IAS
• The history of constitutional development in India begins with the passing of the Regulating Act in
1773. Subsequently, the Pitt's India Act of 1784 and the successive Charter Acts from 1793 to 1853 formed
a significant part of the constitutional changes under the rule of the East India Company (EIC).
• The Revolt of 1857 brought about important changes in the British administration in India. After the
revolt, the British Parliament passed a new Act in 1858, which ended the EIC's rule and brought the
administration of India under the direct control of the British Crown. Thereafter, as a result of the Indian
national movement, significant developments took place in the constitutional history of India.
Court of Director
• The Act made changes in the constitution of the Court of Directors. The Court of Proprietors would now
elect twenty-four members every four years, with six directors retiring annually instead of all directors
being elected yearly.
• The actions of the Directors were subjected to the supervision of the British Government. The Directors
of the Company were required to submit all communications about the civil and military affairs of
Bengal (administration of Bengal) and the revenues of India to the British Government.
Executive Government
• Governor-General of Bengal: The status of Governor of Bengal was raised to the Governor-General
of Bengal, and Governors of other provinces in India were subordinate to him.
ð Warren Hastings was the last Governor of Bengal (1772-73) and the first Governor-General of
Bengal from 1773 to 1785.
• Governor General in Council: The Governor-General was to be assisted by a council of four members.
Decisions were to be made by majority vote, and the Governor-General had a casting vote.
v The Governor General in Council was given the power:
1. To administer the Bengal Presidency (civil and military administration)
2. To superintend and control the presidencies of Madras and Bombay in matters of war and
peace.
ð The Governor-General did not possess the power of veto.
• Subordination of Madras and Bombay: The Governors of Madras and Bombay were required to
regularly send information to the Governor-General regarding the Company's government revenues
and interests.
ð Before the Regulating Act of 1773, the three EIC presidencies were independent, and no one was
subordinate to another.
• Final Authority: The Governor General was directly controlled by the Court of Directors and kept it fully
informed of the Company's affairs.
Judiciary
• The Act established a Supreme Court of Justice at Calcutta with the Chief Justice (Sir Elijah Impey) and
three judges to give justice to Europeans, their employees and the citizens of Calcutta.
Governor-General in Council
• The Governor General's Executive Council was expanded to include the Law Member, bringing the total
number of members to four. (Pitt’s Act of 1784 reduced it to three)
ð Lord Macaulay was the first Law Member of the Governor-General's Council. He influenced the
government's educational policy for many years.
• The Governor-General in Council was given the power to legislate for all British territories in India.
Hence, the Governors of Bombay and Madras were deprived of their legislative power.
• The Council was given the power to control, superintend, and direct the Company's civil and military
affairs.
• The Bombay, Bengal, Madras and other regions were subjected to complete control of the Governor
General in Council.
Law Commission
• The Governor-General was empowered to appoint the Law Commission to study, collect and codify
various rules and regulations prevalent in India.
ð The first Law Commission was appointed in India in 1834 under the Charter Act of 1833 and was
presided over by Lord Macaulay.
Civil Service
• The Act declared that no Indians should be disqualified for any place in the company's service.
However, nothing was done, and Indians remained excluded from higher posts in civil and military service.
Trade
• The Charter Act of 1833 ended the Company's monopoly of tea trade and trade with China.
• The Company was to have only political functions (deprived of commercial function). Thus, the Act
ended the Company as a commercial body.
Slavery
• The Charter Act of 1833 instructed the government to abolish slavery.
ð The Indian government abolished slavery in 1843.
Other Provisions
• The number of members of the Presidency Councils was reduced to two.
• The Indian possessions of the Company were to be held in trust for the British Crown.
• India was to pay the Company's debts. The company’s shareholders were guaranteed a dividend of
10.5% per annum.
Civil Service
• The Act provided for appointing members of the covenanted civil service of India based on a suitable
competitive examination. Thus, Indians were allowed to enter the civil service.
• The committee (the Committee on the Indian Civil Service) headed by Lord Macaulay was appointed
to advise on the measures to be adopted to give effect to the Act of 1853.
Law Member
• The Law Member was made a full member of the Executive Council of the Governor General.
Number of Directors
• The number of Directors was reduced from 24 to 18. Six of them were to be nominated by the Crown.
• The approval of the Governor-General was required for the bill passed by the legislature to become an
act.
• Governor-General’s Ordinances had the validity of an Act.
Executive Council
• After the Regulating Act of 1773, the Governor-General was assisted by a council of four members.
• Pitt’s Act reduced the number of members of the Governor-General's Council to three.
• The Charter Act of 1833 added one Law Member and expanded the number of members to Four.
• After the Government of India Act of 1858, the executive council had five members because, for
the time being, the Commander-in-Chief was a member of the Governor General's Council.
• Indian Councils Act of 1861 increased the number of members in the Governor-General's Executive
Council from four to five.
Provincial Administration
• The provincial governments had significant autonomy until 1833, when their power to enact laws was
revoked. The Act of 1861 returned the legislative power of the Madras and Bombay presidencies, but
they had to obtain permission from the Governor-General to pass an act.
• It laid down that legislative councils like that of the centre should be established first in Bombay,
Madras and Bengal and then in other provinces. Thus, it marked the turning of the tide of
centralisation.
• The Governor General was given the power to create new provinces for legislative purposes and could
appoint Lieutenant Governors.
ð New legislative councils for Bengal, the Northwestern Provinces, and Punjab were established in
1862, 1886, and 1897, respectively.
• In 1859, Lord Canning introduced the portfolio system in Calcutta's government. The Indian Councils
Act of 1861 recognised this system and transformed the viceroy’s Executive Council into a miniature
cabinet run on the portfolio system. Under this system, each of the five members was placed in charge
of a distinct department - home, revenue, military, finance, and law.
• The Indian Councils Act of 1892 increased the number of additional members of the Central Executive
Council to 10 to 16, of whom not less than half were to be non-officials, as under the Act of 1861.
• Under the regulations finally adopted, the Central Legislative Council was to consist of:
v Nine ex-officio members (the Governor-General, six members of the Executive Council, the Com-
mander-in-Chief and the head of the province in which the Council met, i.e. Lieutenant Governor of
Bengal or Punjab)
v Six official Additional Members
v Ten non-official members of the Legislative Councils of Bengal, Bombay, Madras and the North-
western province.
• The official members, together with the ex-officio members, constituted an official majority.
• The Act provided for the nomination of some non-official members by the viceroy on the recommen-
dation of the provincial legislative councils and the Bengal Chamber of Commerce.
• Similar changes were introduced in the composition of provincial legislative councils. The official major-
ity was maintained in all provinces.
• The Act provided for the nomination of some non-official members by the Governors on the recom-
mendation of the universities, district board, municipalities, zamindars and chambers of commerce
to the provincial legislative councils.
Elected or Nominated?
• In practice, different bodies elected their representatives and forwarded their names. The Govern-
ment always accepted these names. Thus, the members were elected representatives.
• The idea behind the nomination of some non-official members by the Governor-General or the Gov-
ernor was to underline that the members occupied seats on the Legislative Council not as represent-
atives of specific bodies but as nominees of the Governor-General or the Governor.
Limitations
Ø The official majority was maintained in the legislative councils.
Ø Direct election was not introduced to represent non-official members.
Ø Supplementary questions could not be asked.
Ø The budget could not be voted on.
Expansion of Councils
• This Act increased the strength of the Central (Imperial) and Provincial Legislative Councils.
• Excluding the ex-officio members:
v Central Legislative Council: The number of additional members (official and non-official) was in-
creased to sixty (from 16). The official members were to be in a majority.
v Provincial Legislative Councils: The number of additional members (official and non-official) was
to be between thirty and fifty (not uniform). Provincial Councils have a majority of non-official
members.
ü The number of additional members was 50 in large states like Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, Madras,
Bombay, and the United Provinces.
ü The number of additional members was 30 in smaller states like Punjab, Assam and Burma.
Indirect Elections
• For the first time, this act introduced indirect elections in the Central Legislative Council and Provincial
Legislative Councils. The elected non-official members were elected by indirect elections:
v By the provincial councils in the case of the Imperial Council
v By municipal committees and district boards in the case of provincial councils.
• Example: For the 13 seats from the Provincial Legislative Councils:
v The tax-paying citizens of a town or village elected representatives for municipal committees or
local boards, which in turn elected representatives for provincial Legislative Councils. These non-
official members of the Provincial Councils, in turn, elected representatives to the Central Legislative
Council.
• Similar provisions were made for forming Provincial Legislative Councils.
Separate Electorate
• The Act introduced for the first time the principle of communal representation in India and provided
a separate electorate for Muslims; that is, Muslims were to be elected by the electorates consisting of
Muslims only.
• The Reforms introduced the system of separate electorates. This was done in the name of protecting the
Muslim minority. But in reality, this was a part of the policy of dividing Hindus and Muslims and thus
maintaining British supremacy in India. The system of separate electorates:
v Checked the progress of India’s unification.
v Encouraged separatist tendencies.
v Became a potent factor in the growth of communalism in the country.
v Prevented people from concentrating on economic and political problems common to all Indians,
Hindus or Muslims.
Principle of Weightage
• Muslims were also given weightage, i.e., more seats were given to them than the number warranted by
their proportion of the local population.
Finance
• The Act provided the complete separation of the sources of revenue between the central and
provincial governments.
• It separated provincial budgets from the central budget for the first time and authorised the provincial
legislatures to enact their budgets.
Other Provisions
• Relaxation of Control: The British parliament's control over the Indian government was relaxed, and
that of the Central government over the provincial government was reduced.
• Enlargement of Functions of Councils: The right to ask supplementary questions was extended to
all members.
• Office of the High Commissioner: The Act established a new office of the High Commissioner for
India in London and granted him some of the functions that were previously performed by the
Secretary of State for India.
• Statutory Commission: The Act provided for the appointment of a statutory commission at the end
of ten years after the act was passed to inquire into and report on the working system of the government.
The Simon Commission of 1927 was an outcome of this provision.
Limitations
Ø No Responsible Government in the Centre: The chief executive authority remained vested in the
Governor-General, who remained responsible to the British Parliament through the Secretary of State
and not to the Indian Legislature. Thus, the Governor General had too many powers and was not
responsible to the Legislature.
Ø The Central Government was more representative and responsive but not responsible.
Ø The central legislature had no control over the Governor-General and his Executive Council.
Ø The experiment of diarchy failed. The excessive control of the finance department (reserved subject)
over the administration of transferred subjects affected their smooth functioning. Transferred subjects
starved financially as they needed more money for development.
Ø The reserved subjects were to be administered by the Governor and his Executive Council. They were
appointed by the British Government and were jointly responsible to the Governor-General and the
Secretary of State for India.
Ø The Governor exercised effective powers over the whole administration through the Instrument of
Instruction and Executive Business Rules.
Ø The powers of the legislature were limited or restricted.
Ø The Governor could overrule the Ministers on any grounds which he considered special.
Ø The central government had unrestricted control over the provincial governments.
At Federal level
All-India Federation
• The Act proposed an all-India federation of British provinces and princely states. The Princely States
had the option to join the Federation, and the nature of the relationship would differ from state to
state according to the Instrument of Accession. However, once extended, the Instrument of Accession
would be irrevocable.
• The federation’s formation was conditional on the fulfilment of two conditions.
1. The princely states that would join the federation should fill at least 52 (half) of the 104 seats of
the Council of State.
2. The aggregate population of states in the above category should be 50 per cent (half) of the total
population of all Indian states.
• Since these conditions were not fulfilled, the proposed federation never came up. Hence, the Central
Government carried on up to 1946 as per the provisions of the Government of India Act, 1919.
ð The Act proposed a Federal government for India and, for the first time, tried to bring British
provinces and Indian States under one common constitution.
Dyarchy
Bicameral Legislature
• It divided the power between the centre and units in three lists:
1. Federal list (59 subjects): For Centre
2. Provincial list (54 subjects): For Provinces
3. Concurrent list (36 subjects): For both Centres and Provinces
• Residuary powers were given to the Governor-General.
Federal Court
• The Act provided a Federal Court to interpret the provisions and to decide over inter-province
disputes.
ð The Federal Court was set up in 1937.
Limitations
Ø The proposed All India Federation did not materialise as the princely states did not join it.
Ø In a federation, the Constitution is supreme. However, in the Act, the supremacy of the British
Parliament was retained. All rights to amend, alter, or repeal the provisions were kept with the British
Parliament.
Ø The federal part of the 1935 Act never came into operation, and the constitution of the Central
Government in India remained largely the same as that under the Act of 1919.
Ø The Secretary of State for India and the Governor-General were the ultimate authority, and they were
above the Act.
Ø Defence and foreign affairs remained outside the control of the legislature. Meanwhile, the Governor-
General retained special control over other subjects.
Ø No fully responsible government at the Centre. The Governor-General was to be appointed by the
British government and was responsible to it.
Ø There was no mention of Dominion status and the inclusion of provisions to attain it.
• The Government of India Act of 1935 proposed a Federal form of government for India and carried
the essential features of the Federation:
v A written constitution.
v Division of subjects between federal and provincial governments.
v A Federal Court to interpret the provisions of the Constitution.
• This Act greatly influenced our constitution-making in independent India. Indian Constitution
borrowed the following features from the Government of India Act of 1935:
v Federal Scheme
v Provincial autonomy
v Post of Governor
v Emergency provisions
v Administrative details
v Public Service Commissions
v Establishment of Supreme Court (earlier Federal Court)
At Provincial Level
Provincial Autonomy
• The Act abolished the dyarchy at provinces and introduced provincial autonomy.
• For the first time, the act recognised the provinces as having separate legal identities. They were freed
from ‘the superintendence, direction’ of the secretary of state and Governor-General. Provinces
henceforth derived their legal authority directly from the British Crown.
• Provinces were given independent financial powers and resources. Provincial governments could
borrow money on their security.
Responsible Government
• The Act provided for introducing responsible government in all eleven provinces - Bombay, Madras,
Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, Assam, Central Provinces, United Provinces, NWFP, Punjab, and Sindh. The whole of
the Provincial Executive was now made responsible to or removable by the provincial Legislature.
• The distinction between transferred and reserved subjects was removed, and all Provincial subjects
were placed under the charge of the popular ministries. However, the Governors were given special
powers.
v Governors could veto legislative action and legislate on their own.
v Governors retained full control over the civil service and the police.
• The governors in provinces were invested with special executive powers. They could exercise discretion
in matters like law and order, the interests of minorities and the people of backward areas, and the
protection of the British commercial interests and those of the rulers of states.
Bicameral Legislatures
• The Act provided bicameral legislatures in six provinces, namely Bombay, Bengal, Madras, the United
Provinces, Bihar, and Assam.
Limitations
• The governor's power restricted the power of ministers and legislature in the provinces.
• Governors were to be appointed by the British government and were responsible to it.
Separate Electorate
• The system of religion-based and class-based electorates was further extended.
• The separate electorate was further extended to women, depressed classes (scheduled castes), and
labour (workers).
Restricted Franchise
• Franchise was extended, and women got voting rights on the same basis as men. However, the Act
did not give all adults the right to vote (universal adult franchise). Only 14 per cent of the total pop-
ulation in British India was given the right to vote.
Other Provisions
• A partial reorganisation of the provinces:
v Sind was separated from Bombay.
v The Bihar and Orissa province was partitioned into separate provinces of Bihar and Orissa.
v Separation of Burma from British India
• Establishment of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
• Establishment of the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC), a Provincial Public Service Commission
(PPSC) in each province, and the Joint Public Service Commission (JPSC) for two or more provinces.
Salient features
• The Act abolished:
v The Office of the Secretary of State for India and transferred its functions to the Secretary of State
for Commonwealth affairs.
v The title of ‘Emperor of India' for the British Crown.
v All existing treaties with the princely states, i.e. paramountcy over the princely states, lapsed.
• It lapsed the treaty relations with tribal areas.
• It discontinued appointment to civil services and reservation of posts by the Secretary of State for
India.
• It authorised the Constituent Assemblies of both dominions:
v To frame and adopt a new constitution for their territories.
v To repeal any Act passed by the British Parliament, including the Independence Act itself.
v To act as the Parliament to make laws for their respective territories till the new constitutions were
drafted and enacted.
• Till the framing of new constitutions, the Act provided for the governance of the new dominions and
provinces by the Government of India Act 1935. However, the dominions had the authority to make
changes to the Act.
• It ended the British Crown's power to veto or reserve bills.
• The Act abolished the Office of Viceroy. It provided that on the advice of the dominion cabinet, the
British King would appoint a governor-general for each dominion as the constitutional head of the
states until the formation of new constitutions.
• The Governor-General and Governors of various provinces:
v Became the constitutional executive heads.
v Should act on the advice of the respective council of ministers.
v Would not have veto power.
• No law passed by the British Parliament after August 15, 1947, would extend to either of the dominions
unless passed in the respective Assemblies.
ð Lord Mountbatten continued as Governor-General, and Jawaharlal Nehru was appointed India's first
Prime Minister.
ð Muhammad Ali Jinnah became Pakistan's Governor-General, and Liaquat Ali Khan became Prime
Minister.