Comparative Study of Phaco-Trabeculectomy and Small Incision Cataract Surgery Trabeculectomy in 50 Cataract Patients
Comparative Study of Phaco-Trabeculectomy and Small Incision Cataract Surgery Trabeculectomy in 50 Cataract Patients
13(01), 795-798
Article DOI:10.21474/IJAR01/20261
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/20261
RESEARCH ARTICLE
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHACO-TRABECULECTOMY AND SMALL INCISION CATARACT
SURGERY TRABECULECTOMY IN 50 CATARACT PATIENTS
This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of the two surgical techniques in terms of intraocular pressure
control, visual acuity improvement, surgical time, and postoperative complications, offering insights into the optimal
surgical choice for cataract patients with glaucoma.
Methodology:-
Study Design
A prospective, randomized study was conducted at DVVPF’s Medical College &Hospital between December 2023
and November 2024. The study included 50 cataract patients diagnosed with coexisting glaucoma.
Patient Selection
Inclusion Criteria:
o Patients aged 50-80 years with confirmed cataract and glaucoma.
o No previous ocular surgery.
o Informed consent obtained.
Exclusion Criteria:
o Secondary glaucoma.
o Advanced diabetic retinopathy.
o Other ocular comorbidities affecting vision.
Surgical Procedures
Phaco-Trabeculectomy Group (n=25):
o Standard phacoemulsification with foldable IOL implantation.
o Trabeculectomy performed with mitomycin-C application.
o Sutures applied as required.
SICS-Trabeculectomy Group (n=25):
o Manual small incision cataract surgery with rigid IOL implantation.
o Trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C.
o Suturing according to standard protocol.
Outcome Measures
1. Intraocular Pressure (IOP): Measured preoperatively, and postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and
6 months using Goldmann applanation tonometry.
2. Visual Acuity (VA): Assessed using Snellen's chart at the same intervals.
3. Surgical Time: Recorded from incision to the closure of the surgical site.
4. Complications: Documented intraoperative and postoperative complications, including hyphema, shallow
anterior chamber, and infection.
Statistical Analysis
Paired t-test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative IOP and VA within each group. An independent t-
test was utilized to compare outcomes between the two groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Results:-
Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
Parameter Phaco-Trab Group SICS-Trab Group (n=25) p-value
(n=25)
Age (mean ± SD) 67.4 ± 8.2 68.1 ± 7.5 0.721
Male/Female Ratio 14/11 13/12 0.793
Preoperative IOP (mmHg) 23.8 ± 2.4 24.1 ± 2.1 0.598
Preoperative VA 0.54 ± 0.12 0.56 ± 0.11 0.455
(logMAR)
796
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 13(01), 795-798
Surgical Time
Phaco-Trab Group SICS-Trab Group
Parameter p-value
(minutes) (minutes)
Surgical Time 45.2 ± 6.4 59.1 ± 7.3 <0.001*
*Statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Complications
Complication Type Phaco-Trab Group (n=25) SICS-Trab Group (n=25)
Hyphema 2 4
Shallow Anterior Chamber 1 3
Endophthalmitis 0 1
Choroidal Detachment 1 2
Total 4 10
Discussion:-
This study demonstrates the comparative efficacy of phaco-trabeculectomy and SICS trabeculectomy in managing
cataracts with coexisting glaucoma. The phaco-trabeculectomy group showed superior outcomes in terms of IOP
reduction, visual acuity improvement, and fewer complications.
Surgical Time:
The shorter surgical time in the phaco-trabeculectomy group is noteworthy, reflecting the efficiency of modern
phacoemulsification techniques. Reduced surgical time correlates with less intraoperative stress and faster patient
recovery.
Complications:
The phaco-trabeculectomy group had fewer complications, suggesting a more favorable safety profile. The higher
complication rates in the SICS-trabeculectomy group may be attributed to the manual nature of the procedure and
the larger incision required, which increases the risk of postoperative issues.
797
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 13(01), 795-798
Limitations:
This study's limitations include a relatively small sample size and a single-center design, which may limit the
generalizability of the findings. Further multicenter studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these results.
Conclusion:-
Phaco-trabeculectomy is superior to SICS trabeculectomy in managing cataract patients with coexisting glaucoma,
offering better intraocular pressure control, visual acuity outcomes, and fewer complications. These findings support
the adoption of phaco-trabeculectomy as a preferred surgical approach in this patient population.
References:-
1. Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. (2001). Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial
Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology,
108(11), 1943-1953.
2. Singh K, Shrivastava A. (2009). Intraocular pressure fluctuations: how do they affect the optic nerve? Current
Opinion in Ophthalmology, 20(2), 90-94.
3. Zhao Y, Chen X, Wang X. (2017). Comparison of visual outcomes and complications after
phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery in highly myopic eyes. BMC
Ophthalmology, 17(1), 65.
4. Francis BA, Singh K, Lin SC, et al. (2011). Novel glaucoma procedures: a report by the American Academy
of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology, 118(7), 1466-1480.
5. Tham CC, Kwong YY, Leung DY, et al. (2009). Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract
surgery for coexisting cataract and glaucoma: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. American Journal of
Ophthalmology, 148(3), 368-375.
798