FINAL INTERNSHIP REPORT

AMITY UNIVERSITY
CHHATTISGARH

UNDER THE GUIDEANCE AND

SUPERVISION OF
- ADVOCATE B. K. SHUKLA
DISTRICT COURT, KORBA (C.G)

Submitted To: PROF. PARUL SINHA MAM

Submitted By: PRATHAM AGRAWAL

BA LLB (H), 9th semester

Enrollment Number : A80611119014

 INDEX
 Cover Page

 Internship Certificate

 Index

 Preface

 Acknowledgement

 The District Court Of Korba

 Jurisdiction Of The District Court And Composition

 Daily Internship Duties

 Description Of Prominent Cases

 Drafted Documents

 Conclusion
 Preface

This report is an outcome of the six-eight weeks

internship programme conducted by Amity Law School,
Amity University Chhattisgarh for the student of 9th
semester, my internship was done at District Court,
Korba (C.G) . I have tried my best to do justice with my
activities and put it in black and white with the same
effort as I did it during the internship.
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

At the outset, I would like to thank god for his blessings

and benevolently granting me vigor and audacity to
complete my internship successfully. Before submitting
my detailed report on internship. I find an opportunity to
place on record my warm gratitude towards our respected
teachers to encourage us towards internship. I would like
to place gratitude towards Adv. B. K. Shukla under whom
under I completed my internship as well as for profession
of advocacy in near future.
I am thankful to him for his for his invaluable teaching
and advise given to me, for helping me in exploring and
understanding the legal drafting preparation and research
methodology better.
 About District & Sessions Court

Korba :-
Till 30th September 2004, the civil court of Korba
was under District and Sessions court Bilaspur. Civil
District court Korba came in to existence on
01.10.2004. Hon'ble Shri R.S.Sharma was the first
District & Sessions Judge of the district court Korba.
The Foundation stone of new District and Sessions
court building was laid by Hon'ble Shri Subray Rama
Nayak Hon'ble Chief Justice of High Court
Chhattisgarh, in presence of Hon'ble Shri Sunil
Kumar Sinha, Hon'ble Justice Of Chhattisgarh High
Court on 3rd September 2006.
On 24 April 2010, the new court building was
inagurated by Hon'ble Shri Pritinker Diwaker, Hon'ble
Justice High Court Chhattisgarh. At Present Shri
Rakesh Bihari Ghore is the District & Sessions
Judge of the district court Korba.
Jurisdiction Of The District Court And
Composition :-

The District Court or Additional District Court exercises

jurisdiction both on original side and appellate side in civil
and criminal matters arising in the District. The territorial
and pecuniary jurisdiction in civil matters is usually set in
concerned state enactments on the subject of civil courts.
On the criminal side, jurisdiction is exclusively derived
from the criminal procedure code. As per this code the
maximum sentence a district court may award to a convict
is capital punishment.
The District court has appellate jurisdiction over all
subordinate courts situated in the district on both civil and
criminal matters. Subordinate courts, on the civil side (in
ascending order) are Junior Civil Judge Court, Principal
Junior Civil Judge Court, Senior Civil Judge Court (also
called sub court). Subordinate courts, on the criminal side
(in ascending order) are, Second Class Judicial Magistrate
Court, First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Chief Judicial
Magistrate Court, certain matter on criminal side or civil side
cannot be tried by a lesser court than a district court. This
gives the District Court original jurisdiction in such matters.
Appeals from the district courts lie to the High Court of the
concerned state.
 Daily Internship Duties :-

 I was assigned to read case files to learn how files

are maintained and how the records are maintained.

 I was assigned to observe the proceedings during

Arguments through internet.

 Office type organizational work- photocopying,

organizing papers, keeping files in orders,
organizing the desk.

 Interacting to various lawyer in our office.

 Research on judgements that are related to facts

of case.
 CASE SUMMARY

In The Court Of Shri. Jitesh Kumar Kaushik

Judicial Magistrate First Class, Korba, (C.G)

IN THE MATTER OF-: State V/S Rohit Joshi

SECTION INNVOLVED-: I.P.C-420

-I.P.C Section 420-: Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.—
Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver
any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of
a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable
of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years,
and shall also be liable to fine.

COMPLAINANT DETAIL-:
1) Name- Shankar lal prasad
2) Father`s Name- Late. Gulab Chand Prasad
3) Date Of Birth- 1971
4) Nationality- Indian

PROVISIONS DISCUSSED-:
1) I.P.C- Section 420-: This provision is discussed in the given case summary
that when (Accused) Rohit Joshi had committed crime by fraud of Rs. 1,34,977
and (Accused) Rohit Joshi and buyed one Gold Chain which cost`s 1,14,424.00
Rs. And its weight was 36.21 gram and one Gold ring which cost`s 19,217.00
Rs. And its weight was 6.570 gram and then (Accused) Rohit Joshi gave
(Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad a cheque including taxes and Cheque No.
was 34799910382 of State Bank Of India, and all the details which was given
by (Accused) Rohit Joshi was also fake and invalid. As we have discussed in the
section that Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person
deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the
whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed,
and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend
to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Hence, it means that this section 420 I.P.C is applicable in this case.

CASE SUMMARY-:
In this case there is a (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad, he is having a
Jewellery shop in T.P Nagar, Korba. (Complainant) Shankar Lal
PrasadJewellery shop name is Prasad Gems and Jewellery, On 02/11/19 at 11.00
am-12.00 am (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad, Jewellery shop one man came
namely (Accused) Nanji Patel and he told to (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad
that he want one Gold chain and one Gold ring and he also told to
(Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad that he lives in Amlidih (Korba) and he want
to buy all the gold ornaments by a cheque as at that time there was
Demonetization so that’s why (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad accepted that
cheque because at time there was Demonetization period. (Accused)Nanji Patel
buy one Gold Chain which cost`s 1,14,424.00 Rs. And its weight was 36.21
gram and one Gold ring which cost`s 19,217.00 Rs. And its weight was 6.570
gram and then (Accused)Nanji Patel gave (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad a
cheque including taxes and Cheque No. was 34799910382 of State Bank Of
India. After few days when (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad enquired about
(Accused)Nanji Patel he found that the address and mobile number 7471118768
was fake and was invalid and then (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad tried to
contact (Accused)Nanji Patel then (Accused)Nanji Patel told that he will return
back all the money but he didn’t paid a single penny. (Complainant) Shankar
Lal Prasad contacted Korba Crime Branch they told that the man who was
telling his name Nanji Patel was his fake name and his real name was Rohit
Joshi, (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad faced a fraud of Rs. 1,34,977 Rs.
Hence (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad wants to file a case and he also wants
that police and prosecution should take strict actions upon (Accused) Rohit
Joshi.
IN THE MATTER OF-: State V/S Rohit Joshi

SECTION INNVOLVED-: I.P.C-420

-I.P.C Section 420-: Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.—
Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver
any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of
a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable
of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years,
and shall also be liable to fine.

COMPLAINANT DETAIL-:
1) Name- Shankar lal prasad
2) Father`s Name- Late. Gulab Chand Prasad
3) Date Of Birth- 1971
4) Nationality- Indian

PROVISIONS DISCUSSED-:
1) I.P.C- Section 420-: This provision is discussed in the given case summary
that when (Accused) Rohit Joshi had committed crime by fraud of Rs. 1,34,977
and (Accused) Rohit Joshi and buyed one Gold Chain which cost`s 1,14,424.00
Rs. And its weight was 36.21 gram and one Gold ring which cost`s 19,217.00
Rs. And its weight was 6.570 gram and then (Accused) Rohit Joshi gave
(Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad a cheque including taxes and Cheque No.
was 34799910382 of State Bank Of India, and all the details which was given
by (Accused) Rohit Joshi was also fake and invalid. As we have discussed in the
section that Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person
deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the
whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed,
and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend
to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Hence, it means that this section 420 I.P.C is applicable in this case.

CASE SUMMARY-:
In this case there is a (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad, he is having a
Jewellery shop in T.P Nagar, Korba. (Complainant) Shankar Lal
PrasadJewellery shop name is Prasad Gems and Jewellery, On 02/11/19 at 11.00
am-12.00 am (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad, Jewellery shop one man came
namely (Accused) Nanji Patel and he told to (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad
that he want one Gold chain and one Gold ring and he also told to
(Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad that he lives in Amlidih (Korba) and he want
to buy all the gold ornaments by a cheque as at that time there was
Demonetization so that’s why (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad accepted that
cheque because at time there was Demonetization period. (Accused)Nanji Patel
buy one Gold Chain which cost`s 1,14,424.00 Rs. And its weight was 36.21
gram and one Gold ring which cost`s 19,217.00 Rs. And its weight was 6.570
gram and then (Accused)Nanji Patel gave (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad a
cheque including taxes and Cheque No. was 34799910382 of State Bank Of
India. After few days when (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad enquired about
(Accused)Nanji Patel he found that the address and mobile number 7471118768
was fake and was invalid and then (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad tried to
contact (Accused)Nanji Patel then (Accused)Nanji Patel told that he will return
back all the money but he didn’t paid a single penny. (Complainant) Shankar
Lal Prasad contacted Korba Crime Branch they told that the man who was
telling his name Nanji Patel was his fake name and his real name was Rohit
Joshi, (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad faced a fraud of Rs. 1,34,977 Rs.
Hence (Complainant) Shankar Lal Prasad wants to file a case and he also wants
that police and prosecution should take strict actions upon (Accused) Rohit
Joshi.
 CASE SUMMARY

In The Court Of SHRI PRAVIN KUMAR PRADHAN,

1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Korba, (C.G)

IN THE MATTER OF-: State V/S Kumari Sonbai

SECTION INNVOLVED-: I.P.C – 379

1) I.P.C- 379-: Punishment for theft- Whoever commits theft shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

COMPLAINANT DETAIL-:
1) Name- Kumari Sonbai
2) Fathers Name- Nagarmal Sahu
3) Date Of Birth- 1995
4) Nationality- Indian

PROVISIONS DISCUSSED-:
1) I.P.C- Section 379-:
This provision is discussed in the given case summary that when Accused’s
has committed theft with same nature and mind set, is applicable for a crime
i.e. theft. As we have discussed in the section that whoever commits theft
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which
may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
Hence, it means that this section 379 I.P.C is applicable in this case.
CASE SUMMARY-:
In this case there is an (Complainant) Kumari Sonbai Sahu, she lives in
R.D.A colony, House No. 10, near chitra multiplex , Ramsagar Para, Korba.
On 02/02/2020 at evening (Complainant) Kumari Sonbai Sahu goes to
Budhwari Bazzar with her sister joteshwari Sahu and in Budhwari Bazaar
there was a huge crowed. (Complainant) Kumari Sonbai Sahu went to clothes
strore and that time she saw that three ladies was following her in the cloth
market. One of the lady was fat and she was short heighted, and she was
wearing green Blouse with red border and second lady was wearing blue
saree with black Blouse and on small baby was also there with that lady and
third lady was wearing orange saree with black border and she was also
having a baby with her. These three ladies were roaming near the
(Complainant) Kumari Sonbai Sahu. When (Complainant) Kumari Sonbai
Sahu completed her shopping and started paying the amount of money then
at that time the three ladies snatched the purse of (Complainant) Kumari
Sonbai Sahu, and in that purse there was a Aadhar Card and 5000 Rs. Cash.
They were genuine thieves and (Complainant) Kumari Sonbai Sahu want to
file a case.
 CASE SUMMARY

In The Court Of Smt. VANDANA VERMA ,

Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class, Korba, (C.G)

IN THE MATTER OF-: State V/S Smt. Kumari Bai

SECTION INNVOLVED-: I.P.C-294,323

-I.P.C Section 294-: Obscene acts and songs.—Whoever, to the annoyance of
others—(a) does any obscene act in any public place, or
(b) sings, recites or utters any obscene song, ballad or words, in or near any
public place, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a
term which may extend to three months, or with fine, or with both.
- I.P.C Section 323-: According to section 323 of Indian penal code,
Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 334, voluntarily causes
hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term
which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one
thousand rupees, or with both.

COMPLAINANT DETAIL-:
1) Name- Sushila Devi
2) Husband`s Name- Basant Ram Sahu
3) Date Of Birth- 1947
4) Nationality- Indian

PROVISIONS DISCUSSED-:
1) I.P.C- Section 294-:
This provision is discussed in the given case summary that when (Accused)
done an offence by giving slangs and using that words which should not be
use in any public places, which sounds bad to the (complainant) Sushila devi.
As we have discussed in the section that Whoever, to the annoyance of
others—(a) does any obscene act in any public place, or
(b) sings, recites or utters any obscene song, ballad or words, in or near any
public place, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a
term which may extend to three months, or with fine, or with both.
Hence, it means that this section 294 I.P.C is applicable in this case.

2) I.P.C- Section 323-:

This provision is discussed in the given case summary that when (Accused)
done an offence by beating to a lady (complainant) Sushila devi in the nearby
square of Agrasen bhawan, everyone is watching and going than also
(Accused) didn’t stop, and this scenario was occur in the nearby square of
Agrasen Bhavan. As we have discussed in the section that whoever
voluntarily causes hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment of either
description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may
extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.
Hence, it means that this section 294 I.P.C is applicable in this case.

CASE SUMMARRY-:
In this case there is an (Complainant) Sushila devi, Husband Name-Basant
Ram Sahu, Age-69 years, she lives Jhagaeah, Korba. On 29/04/17 at evening
(Complainant) Sushila devi was sitting with Mrs. Jugbati, Husband Nmae-
Vanvali Pardhi Infront of the house of Mrs. Jugbati in nearby square of
Banyan Tree, at that time (Complainant) Sushila devi husband`s affair wife
(Accused)Kumari Bai came from Agrasen Bhavan road and she started
started giving abuse about (Complainant) Sushila devi caste and also started
giving slangs. Then both (Complainant) Sushila devi and (Accused)Kumari
Bai starts arguing with each other. Then (Accused) Kumari Bai started
beating with a Bamboo stick to (Complainant) Sushila devi.(Complainant)
Sushila devi got hurt on her left leg and on her left Hand. These all scenario
was seened by (Complainant) Sushila Devi tenant Jukhbaati Pardhi, and by
Chetan Nishad.
Hence, (Complainant) Sushila devi wants to file a case and she also wants
that police and should take strict action upon (Accused) Kumari Bai.
 NOTICE DRAFTING
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF PRICE OF GOODS SOLD AT A
REASONABLE PRICE AND DELIVERED
IN THE COURT OF THE …………………….
Suit No. ……….. Of 20 ………..
C.D……………………………………………………………………
…………..Plaintiff
Versus

C.F…………………………………………………………………….
Defendant
The abovenamed plaintiff most respectfully submits as under :-
1. On the …………… day of ……………. 20 ...................... Plaintiff
sold and delivered to the defendant (sundry articles of house
furniture), but no express agreement was made as to the price.
2. The goods were reasonably worth ...................... rupees.
3. The defendant has not paid the money.
4. (Facts showing when the cause of action arose and that the court
has jurisdiction)
5. The value of the subject matter of the suit for the purpose of
jurisdiction is ………….. rupees and for the purpose of court-fee is
……………….. rupees.

RELIEF CLAIMED :
The plaintiff claims Rs. ……………. As the reasonable price of the
goods sold to the defendant, or the amount this Court deems
reasonable and fit, may be decreed against the defendant with costs of
the suit.
Plaintiff
Through
Advocate
 NOTICE DRAFTING
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF PRICE OF GOODS SOLD AT A
REASONABLE PRICE AND DELIVERED
IN THE COURT OF THE …………………….
Suit No. ……….. Of 20 ………..
C.D……………………………………………………………………
…………Plaintiff
Versus

C.F…………………………………………………………………….
Defendant
The abovenamed plaintiff most respectfully submits as under :-
1. On the …………… day of ……………. 20 ...................... Plaintiff
sold and delivered to the defendant (sundry articles of house
furniture), but no express agreement was made as to the price.
2. The goods were reasonably worth ...................... rupees.
3. The defendant has not paid the money.
4. (Facts showing when the cause of action arose and that the court
has jurisdiction)
5. The value of the subject matter of the suit for the purpose of
jurisdiction is ………….. rupees and for the purpose of court-fee is
……………….. rupees.

RELIEF CLAIMED :
The plaintiff claims Rs. ……………. As the reasonable price of the
goods sold to the defendant, or the amount this Court deems
reasonable and fit, may be decreed against the defendant with costs of
the suit.
Plaintiff
Through
Advocate
 NOTICE DRAFTING
SUIT ON A PROMISSORY NOTE.
IN THE COURT OF THE …………………….
Suit No. ……….. Of 20 ………..
C.D……………………………………………………….……………
………….Plaintiff
Versus

C.F……………………………………………………………………
……………Defendant
The abovenamed plaintiff most respectfully submits as under :-
1. That the defendant borrowed Rs ............................ on
………………. 20 ……………. From the plaintiff at a monthly
interest at the rate of ……….. per cent, and executed a promissory
note in consideration therefor. The money was payable on demand
with interest aforesaid.
2. That the plaintiff demanded the principal amount aforesaid and the
accumulated interest up to date through a registered letter, received by
the defendant on ………… 20 ……………, but the defendant has not
paid the amount of Rs. …………, the principal and interest thereon.
3. That the cause of action arose on …………….. 20 …………….
When the defendant received the demand letter of the plaintiff, and
this court has jurisdictions to decide the matter.
4. That the suit is valued at Rs. ……………. The amount of principal
money and interest up to date of filing the suit from the date of filing
the suit till payment, Court-fee paid on the said amount.
REKIEF CLAIMED :
The plaintiff claims payment of Rs. ……………. From the defendant
and interest from the date of suit till payment thereof.
Plaintiff
Through
Advocate
 CONCLUSION

In Conclusion, This Internship has been a very useful

experience for me. I can safely say that my understanding
of the job environment has increased greatly. However, I
do think that there are some aspects of the job that I could
have done better and that I need to work on. I need to
build more confidence in interpreting the statutes and
also, I need to work on my grammatical errors. The two
main things that I learned after my experience in the
board are the importance of time management and being
self-motivated.