Fermentation and Its Effect On The Physicochemical and Sensory Attributes of Cocoa Beans in The Colombian Amazon
Fermentation and Its Effect On The Physicochemical and Sensory Attributes of Cocoa Beans in The Colombian Amazon
RESEARCH ARTICLE
OPEN ACCESS
Universidad de la Amazonia in the form of an beans. Therefore, it is necessary to standardize the fermentation process to achieve a
award received by AFRG. This study was also quality product that meets the needs of the market.
financially supported by the University of Amazon
through the strategy of hiring research assistants
in the research support units at the CIMAZ
Macagual Amazon Research Center in the
framework of the "Pro-development of the
University" stamp of the Amazon" law 1301 of
2009. The funders had no role in study design, data 1. Introduction
collection and analysis, decision to publish, or
preparation of the manuscript.
Cocoa (Theobroma Cacao L.) is the basic raw material to produce chocolate and other deriva-
tives such as cocoa butter, cocoa powder and cocoa liquor (cocoa paste) [1]. This food has sus-
Competing interests: The authors have declared
tained part of the daily diet of people and is currently making inroads in the cosmetics,
that no competing interests exist.
perfumery and pharmaceutical industries [2] with a requirement in the final quality of the
product. Recent studies have reported that grain quality in sensory terms is affected by differ-
ent factors such as the genetics of the material [3], environmental conditions [4], the state of
maturity of the grain and practices in the postharvest stage [5], such as those related to fermen-
tation and drying [6, 7].
The composition and quality of cocoa beans is determined by a set of physical, chemical
and sensory qualities [8]. According to Garcı́a et al. [9] the main biochemical changes that
influence the quality of cocoa beans occur during the fermentation stage, since it is there
where different microbial communities (yeasts, lactic acid and acetic acid bacteria) intervene
in the metabolization of sugars and other compounds [10]. Fermentation is a process in which
fresh cocoa beans are placed in a wooden box for four to seven days. During this process, the
microorganisms metabolize the pulp that surrounds the beans and generate reactions that
result in an increase in temperature, a decrease in pH and death of the embryo [11]. During
fermentation, different biochemical reactions occur on various substances, including antioxi-
dants, polyphenols and methylxanthines [1]. For example, polyphenols are products of the sec-
ondary metabolism of plants, characterized by aromatic rings with hydroxyl groups as
substituents, which are directly related to the sensory properties of chocolate and its positive
effect on human health [12]. Inadequate fermentation of cocoa produces purple and slaty
beans, negatively affecting quality and thus marketing price [13]. However, it has been
reported that beans without fermentation have genotype-specific sensory attributes, mainly
related to bitterness, astringency and acidity, and other attributes depend directly on fermenta-
tion, drying and roasting [14].
Cocoa fermentation is mainly carried out by small producers or collection centers in an
artisanal manner, with little or no technology and without monitoring of processing condi-
tions, which results in low quality beans [15]. These variations during the fermentation process
make the chocolate industry face increasing challenges in maintaining the supply of standard
products with high quality organoleptic properties [16]. This condition in the final product
causes the cocoa bean to be marketed as ordinary cocoa with prices already regulated by an
industry monopolized by large companies, which in the case of Colombia, acquire 90% of the
national production [17], which means that the payment received does not have a sufficient
impact on the welfare of cocoa-growing families [18], which discourages and puts cocoa pro-
duction at risk, increasing the possibility of a change in production activity [19]. Although fer-
mentation is an indispensable stage to ensure optimal bean quality [20], there are deficiencies
in the number, intensity and coverage of studies that determine the effects of the fermentation
process on physicochemical properties related to the content of protein, fat, fiber, functional
and antioxidant capacity of cocoa beans as well as the different sensory attributes.
The study focused on these cocoa bean processing plants since the three associations of
cocoa producers called ASOACASAN, COMICACAO and COMCAP are part of the strategic
cooperation agreements with European companies whose objective is the production and mar-
keting of organic chocolate under the principles of fair trade which promotes sustainability
since these associations produce “organic cocoa free of deforestation”. Therefore, the objective
of this study was to monitor the biochemical, physical and sensory changes during fermenta-
tion process of cocoa beans in cocoa bean processing plants in the department of Caquetá,
Colombia. It is expected that the study will provide a scientific basis for decision-making based
on the recognition of the local needs of each plant. With this information, the fermentation
processes carried out by cocoa collection centers in the department of Caquetá will be
improved and standardized, resulting in better bean quality and added value in marketing.
fermentation process was carried out in triplicate, that is, three fermentation bins were used
for each storage center.
During fermentation, the following parameters were monitored daily between 13:00 and
16:00 hours: mass temperature, pH of the grain pulp and pH of the cotyledon. Samples for this
monitoring were taken in the center and at the ends of the bin at a depth of 30 cm. This process
was carried out in triplicate. The temperature of the dough was determined using a digital
thermometer Hl 145 (Hanna Instrument, Woonsocket, RI, USA), the pH of the pulp during
fermentation was measured using a pH tester Hl 98108 (Hanna Instrument, Woonsocket, RI,
USA) and the pH of the cotyledon was performed following the methodology used by Papalex-
andratou [21]. For which, 15 g of randomly selected cocoa beans were taken from the three
points of the bin; then, the pulp and testa were manually removed from the beans with a knife
and the cotyledon was macerated with 30 ml of deionized water in a mortar for one minute
until a homogeneous sample was obtained and the pH was read using a pH tester Hl 98108
(Hanna Instrument, Woonsocket, RI, USA).
120 μL of 7.1% anhydrous sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) were taken. It was left to react for 60
min in the dark at room temperature, after which the absorbance was read at 760 nm. Gallic
acid was used as a standard. Results were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (mg GAE)/g
dried cocoa bean. Total flavonoid content was determined by reaction with aluminum chlo-
ride (AlCl3) according to the methodology proposed by Zhishen et al. [27] with slight modifi-
cations. The reaction mixture consisted of 120 μL of deionized water, then 30 μL of the extract
was added, followed by 9 μL of 5% sodium nitrite (NaNO2) (waited 5 minutes), 9 μL of 10%
aluminum chloride (AlCl3) (waited 5 minutes), then 60 μL of 1M sodium hydroxide (NaOH)
(waited 15 minutes) and finally 72 μL of deionized water. It was left to react in the dark at
room temperature for 30 minutes and the absorbance was read at 510 nm. The (+)-catechin
was used as a standard for the quantification of total flavonoids. Results were expressed as mg
catechin equivalent (mgCE)/g dried cocoa bean.
Quantification of methylxanthines and epicatechin were developed on an Ultimate 3000
HPLC, equipped with an auto-injection system and UV-VIS detector, analytical reverse phase
column (Zorbax Eclipse XDB 150mm × 2.1mm) with particle size of 5μm, at 25˚C. All com-
pounds were detected at a wavelength of 273 nm. The mobile phase was water/acetic acid (99.7/
0.3 v/v) (solvent A) and methanol (Solvent B), flow rate 0.5 mL/min. The gradient was as fol-
lows: 0–10 min, 15% linear B; 10.1–18 min, 25% linear B; 18.1–25 min, 30% linear B; 25.1–30
min, 100% linear B; 30.1–35 min, 0% linear B, followed by 5 min of column re-equilibration
before a new injection with an injection volume of 5μL. All analytes were identified and quanti-
fied by the external standard method using calibration curves of the standard substances [28].
2.3.4. Antioxidant activity. The 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazil (DPPH) radical scavenging
activity was used according to the method of Brand-Williams et al. [29] with slight modifica-
tions. A stock solution of DPPH (20 mg/L) was prepared in absolute methanol; the absorbance
of the radical was adjusted to 0.3 absorbance units with methanol at 4˚C, then 3 μL of the
extract and 297 μL of the adjusted DPPH solution were taken. It was allowed to react in the
dark for 30 min at room temperature and the absorbance was read at a wavelength of 517 nm.
The results were expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) values in μmol
of Trolox (μmol Trolox)/g of dry cocoa beans, constructing a reference curve using Trolox as
an antioxidant. The reducing capacity FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) evaluates the
antioxidant capacity of a sample according to its ability to reduce ferric iron (Fe+3) present in a
complex with 2,4,6-tri(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ), to the ferrous form (Fe+3) [30]. The assay
was carried out in a pH 3.6 acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer containing TPTZ and FeCl3.
15 μL of the extract, 15 μL of buffer and 270 μL of FRAP solution were used as samples. It was
allowed to react in the dark for 30 min at room temperature and the absorbance was read at a
wavelength of 590 nm. The FRAP values were expressed as mg ascorbic acid (mg AA/g of dry
cocoa bean), based on a reference curve of ascorbic acid as the primary standard.
2.3.5. Sensory analysis. The cocoa paste samples (cocoa bean roasted and milled) were
analyzed by a sensory panel following the process described by ICONTEC [22]. The roasting
curve was constructed according to bean size and moisture percentage; the roasted beans were
also passed through a grinder and the husk was separated from the nibs. Finally, the nibs were
processed and refined by a melangeur for the manufacture of cocoa paste/liquor. Sensory eval-
uation was carried out with the help of five trained panelists, and the main qualities were deter-
mined: cocoa, acidity, astringency, bitterness, and notes of fresh fruit, brown, floral, wood,
spice and nut, as well as atypical flavors in the samples. The order of perception, intensity,
residual flavor and persistence were established as scores given by the panel. The international
cocoa evaluation scale of excellence [31] was used, which scores from 0 to 10 points, where 0
indicates the complete absence of the evaluated attribute and 10 indicates a very high intensity.
3. Results
3.1. Temperature and pH of fermented cocoa beans
During the fermentation period, the temperature increased until 4 days, reaching an average
of 45˚C, after which it stabilized (Fig 1A). The pH of the pulp did not vary significantly during
the fermentation period, however, there was a small variation at 2 and 3 days between sites
(Fig 1B). The pH in the cotyledon at the beginning of the fermentation process ranged from
5.6 to 6.3 with a steady decrease to 4.5 (Fig 1C).
Fig 1. Daily behavior of three variables during cocoa fermentation in three processing plants in the department of
Caquetá. ASA: ASOACASAN, CMI: COMICACAO, COC: COMCAP: a) mass temperature, b) pulp pH, c) cotyledon
pH. Values correspond to means and standard errors (n = 3).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306680.g001
Table 1. Results (%) of the shear test on fermented and dried cocoa beans at two fermentation times.
Sites Fermentation time (days) Fermentation* Completely fermented Partially fermented Violet Mouldy beans Slaty
ASA 4 92 ± 2.0 78 ± 2.31 14 ± 1.15 b 6.67 ± 1.33 b 0 ± 0.0 1.33 ± 0.67
7 92.7 ± 3.33 73.33 ± 9.4 17.3 ± 7.06 a 8.0 ± 4.16 a 1.33 ± 1.3 0 ± 0.0
General Average 92.33 ± 1.74 ns A 75.67 ± 4.45 ns A 15.67 ± 3.28 B 7.33 ± 1.98 B 0.67 ± 0.67 ns A 0.67 ± 0.42 ns A
CMI 4 76.7 ± 8.11 58 ± 8.72 b 18 ± 0.67 b 21.3 ± 6.36 0.7 ± 0.67 1.33 ± 1.33
7 80 ± 2.0 61.3 ± 2.91 a 18 ± 1.33 a 17.3 ± 2.4 1.3 ± 0.67 1.33 ± 0.67
General Average 74.5 ± 3,81 ns B 59.67 ± 4.18 B 18.67 ± 0.67 B 19.33 ± 3.17 ns A 1.0 ± 0.45 ns A 1.33 ± 0.67 ns A
COC 4 68 ± 4.0 37 ± 13.0 b 31 ± 9.0 31 ± 5.0 0 ± 0.0 1 ± 1.0
7 81 ± 9.0 52 ± 2.0 a 29 ± 7.0 19 ± 9.0 0 ± 0.0 0 ± 0.0
General Average 78.33 ± 5.50 ns B 44.5 ± 6.90 C 30.00 ± 4.69 ns A 25.0 ± 5.45 ns A 0.0 ± 0.00 ns A 0.00 ± 0.00 ns A
a, b, c ns
Different letters indicate statistically significant differences by LSD Fisher means test (P< 0.05). Letters means significant and non-significant differences
between the time of fermentation at each site and A, B, C: between the different sites. ASA: ASOACASAN, CMI: COMICACAO, COC: COMCAP. *: Corresponds to the
sum of completely and partially fermented cocoa beans.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306680.t001
Table 2. Bromatological composition of fermented and dried cocoa beans at two fermentation times.
Sites Fermentation time (days) Fat (%) Ash (%) Moisture (%) Acidity titratable (mg AA/g cocoa)
ASA 4 40.20 ± 0.28 b 2.77 ± 0.003 4.09 ± 0.01 a 0.40 ± 0.02
7 42.49 ± 0.13 a 2.78 ± 0.003 3.75 ± 0.02 b 0.41 ± 0.003
General Average 41.34 ± 0.53 B 2.77 ± 0.003 ns A 3.98 ± 0.8 A 0.40 ± 0.01 ns C
CMI 4 43.68 ± 0.06 b 2.84 ± 0.05 a 3.16 ± 0.03 0.47 ± 0.01
7 45.47 ± 0.34 a 2.48 ± 0.01 b 3.31 ± 0.14 0.48 ± 0.01
General Average 44.58 ± 0.43 A 2.66 ± 0.8 A 3.23 ± 0.07 ns B 0.48 ± 0.01 ns B
COC 4 42.55 ± 0.74 a 2.75 ± 0.05 a 3.21 ± 0.02 a 0.52 ± 0.003
7 43.74 ± 0.44 b 2.51 ± 0.01 b 3.08 ± 0.01 b 0.55 ± 0.01
General Average 43.15 ± 0.47 A 2.63 ± 0.06 A 3.15 ± 0.03 B 0.53 ± 0.01 ns A
Different letters indicate statistically significant differences by LSD Fisher means test (P< 0.05). Letters a, b, c means significant and non-significant ns differences
between the time of fermentation at each site and A, B, C: between the different sites. ASA: ASOACASAN, CMI: COMICACAO, COC: COMCAP.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306680.t002
Fig 2. Content of polyphenols, methylxanthines and antioxidant activity in fermented cocoa beans. Different
letters indicate statistically significant differences by LSD Fisher means test (P< 0.05). Letters a, b, c means significant
and non-significant ns differences between the time of fermentation at each site and A, B, C: between the different sites.
ASA: ASOACASAN, CMI: COMICACAO, COC: COMCAP.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306680.g002
7781.8 μmol Trolox/g cocoa and for the FRAP assay ranged from 369.8 to 606.7 mg AA/g
cocoa among the sites (Fig 2D). At the methylxanthine level, theobromine was different
between sites and only different at the level of hours of fermentation in COC (P<0.05, Fig 2E).
In the case of caffeine and epicatechin, no differences were found between sites (Fig 2F and
2G); however, only for caffeine there were differences between the fermentation hours for the
three sites, while for epicatechin only COC showed differences in fermentation hours.
Fig 3. Sensory profile of cocoa liquor in three processing plants: a. ASA: ASOACASAN, b. CMI: COMICACAO, c. COC:
COMCAP.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306680.g003
Fig 4. Correlation analysis between the different variables analyzed. The numbers shown presented significant correlations (P<0.05)
in the color gradient from red to blue showing negative and positive correlation, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306680.g004
opposing different sensory attributes such as cocoa and bitterness. According to the Monte-
Carlo test, the sites explained 24.9% of the variance (Fig 5).
4. Discussion
4.1. Temperature and pH of fermented cocoa beans
An increase in temperature was found in the fermentation mass due to the activity carried out
by the yeasts involved in the metabolization of sugars in the cocoa pulp (exothermic process),
to produce ethanol and other metabolities (other alcohols, esters, aldehydes and ketones), a
Fig 5. PCA projection of variables related to bromatological composition, polyphenol content, methylxanthines and antioxidant activity in
cocoa beans fermented in different cocoa bean processing plants in the department of Caquetá, Colombia. ASA: ASOACASAN, CMI:
COMICACAO, COC: COMCAP. Contribution of each of the variables evaluated in the PC1/PC2 principal components of PCA, the gradient from
green to red means from greater to lesser contribution.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306680.g005
process that releases heat and increases the fermentation temperature [38]. It was observed
that from the fifth day of fermentation the temperature did not vary, reaching a temperature
between 40–50˚C, a desirable range for good fermentation [39]. Although the environmental
temperature was not a condition that varied, a significant increase in the temperature of the
cocoa fermentation mass was found in the first three days in ASA, this is possibly due to a
greater amount of cocoa bean in mucilage that was used to ferment which influenced main-
taining the temperature resulting from the exothermic reaction during the anaerobic phase in
the fermentation of the cocoa mass [38]. Situation that has been evidenced in studies where
the behavior of temperature is analyzed in different places simultaneously in the departments
of Huila, Santander and Antioquia, Colombia which were different between sites [16]. On the
other hand, from the third day of fermentation the mass recorded an increase in pH, a situa-
tion attributed to the decrease by leaching of citric acid contained in the pulp [40] and the
decrease of volatile organic acids leading to an increase in pH in the fermentation mass [41] as
to the metabolization of citric acid by the yeasts [42]. This decrease in pH within the first few
days at all sites is attributed mainly to the diffusion of organic acids in the bean produced by
lactic acid bacteria [43] and together with the high temperatures, which lead to embryo death,
triggering a series of biochemical changes that greatly impact the development of bean flavor
and color. Also, this behavior was considered [44] to be because of turning the cocoa mass
after 48 hours, because it favors aeration and the growth of acid-acetic bacteria [45]. Finally,
the pH of the cotyledon at the end of fermentation in the three sites was very similar ASA
(4.33), CMI (4.59) and COC (4.63), these results are very important since some studies men-
tion that pH above 5.5 at the end of fermentation indicates lower quality fermented beans [46],
however, Calvo et al. (2021) [16] mentions that pH ranges in cotyledon between 4.8 and 5.2
indicates a good fermentation process. In this study, fermentation at CMI and COC were the
closest to the conditions. Recent studies [47, 48], in addition to showing the decrease in grain
pH during the fermentation process, showed changes in this variable between locations. For
example, the pH of the cotyledon decreased consistently throughout the fermentation, reach-
ing final values of 5.1 ± 0.4 in location A and 5.6 ± 0.4 in location F, with no significant differ-
ence in the variations after 72 h of fermentation.
geographical location and precipitation of the site, because ASA is located in the Andean-
Amazonian transition with higher precipitation than the other sites included in the study;
according to Bomdzele and Molua [60] high precipitation can slow grain drying and increase
moisture content. The decrease in grain moisture content during fermentation at the COC site
is explained by the increase in temperature allowing moisture to diffuse outward and by the
effect of turning the fermentable mass [61]. The increase in acidity percentage is associated
with the increase of lactic acid and acetic acid during the fermentation days [16]. These acids
enter the cotyledon generating biochemical reactions and causing embryo death [62].
attributes of the bean; however, chocolate manufacturers today pay great attention to declaring
their products as functional foods [77]. This opens the door to discussions regarding the man-
ufacture of chocolates with fermented/roasted beans, fermented/unroasted beans or fer-
mented/roasted beans enriched with encapsulated polyphenols.
5. Conclusions
The management of the fermentation process has a significant impact on the different charac-
teristics (biochemical, physical and sensory) of the cocoa beans. A similar trend of fermenta-
tion mass variables was found at all sites where cotyledon pH decreased during the
fermentation process and fat and moisture content varied with fermentation time. At the site
level, COC was different from the other sites specifically for total polyphenol content (TPC),
total flavonoids (TF), DPPH and FRAP. The TPC was higher in the COC site (507 mg GAE/g
Cocoa) with respect to the other sites (< 360 mg GAE/g Cocoa). The TF content followed a
similar behavior to TPC, with significant differences between sites and differences between fer-
mentation times for ASA. The TF was higher in COC (309.1 mg catechin/g) with respect to
CMI (215.6 mg catechin/g) and ASA (185.7 mg catechin/g). Values in DPPH ranged from
5869.3 to 7781.8 μmol Trolox/g cocoa and for the FRAP assay ranged from 369.8 to 606.7 mg
AA/g cocoa among sites. Complementary attributes such as nutty, spicy, woody, woody, floral
and fresh fruit were observed at all sites. Astringency and bitterness increased with days of fer-
mentation at ASA and COC, while astringency and bitterness decreased with the course of fer-
mentation at CMI.
Supporting information
S1 File. Variables physicochemical and sensory attributes of cocoa beans.
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We also thank the following collaborators: Asociación Orgánica Agrı́cola de San José del Fra-
gua (ASOACASAN), Comité de Cultivadores de Cacao en Sistemas Agroforestales del munici-
pio de San Vicente del Caguán (COMICACAO) and Comité de Cacaoteros de los municipios
del Paujil y el Doncello (COMCAP) for providing the benefit facilities to carry out this study.
Finally, we would like to thank Corporacion Econexus Colombia (INSITU) for their support
in the tasting of the samples.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Andrés Felipe Ramı́rez González, Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcı́a,
Juan Carlos Suárez.
Data curation: Andrés Felipe Ramı́rez González, Paola Andrea Polanı́a-Hincapié,
Luis Javier López, Juan Carlos Suárez.
Formal analysis: Andrés Felipe Ramı́rez González, Juan Carlos Suárez.
Funding acquisition: Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcı́a, Juan Carlos Suárez.
Investigation: Andrés Felipe Ramı́rez González, Juan Carlos Suárez.
Methodology: Andrés Felipe Ramı́rez González, Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcı́a,
Paola Andrea Polanı́a-Hincapié, Juan Carlos Suárez.
Project administration: Juan Carlos Suárez.
Resources: Juan Carlos Suárez.
Software: Juan Carlos Suárez.
Supervision: Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcı́a, Paola Andrea Polanı́a-Hincapié,
Luis Javier López, Juan Carlos Suárez.
Validation: Andrés Felipe Ramı́rez González, Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcı́a,
Paola Andrea Polanı́a-Hincapié, Luis Javier López, Juan Carlos Suárez.
Visualization: Andrés Felipe Ramı́rez González, Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcı́a,
Paola Andrea Polanı́a-Hincapié, Luis Javier López, Juan Carlos Suárez.
Writing – original draft: Andrés Felipe Ramı́rez González, Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez Garcı́a,
Paola Andrea Polanı́a-Hincapié, Luis Javier López, Juan Carlos Suárez.
Writing – review & editing: Andrés Felipe Ramı́rez González, Gustavo Adolfo
Gutiérrez Garcı́a, Paola Andrea Polanı́a-Hincapié, Luis Javier López, Juan Carlos Suárez.
References
1. Goya L, Kongor JE, de Pascual-Teresa S. From Cocoa to Chocolate: Effect of Processing on Flavanols
and Methylxanthines and Their Mechanisms of Action. International Journal of Molecular Sciences
2022, Vol 23, Page 14365. 2022;23: 14365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214365 PMID: 36430843
2. Gavrilova NG. Contemporary global production and consumption of cocoa: An assessment. IOP Conf
Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021; 839. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/839/2/022095
3. Hirko B, Mitiku H, Getu A. Role of fermentation and microbes in cacao fermentation and their impact on
cacao quality. Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing 2023. 2023; 1: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.
1007/S43393-023-00160-9
4. Ramón V, Hernández HE, Polania P, Suárez JC. Spatial Distribution of Cocoa Quality: Relationship
between Physicochemical, Functional and Sensory Attributes of Clones from Southern Colombia.
Agronomy 2023, Vol 13, Page 15. 2022;13: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRONOMY13010015
5. Pallares-Pallares A, Perea-Villamil JA, Javier López-Giraldo L. Impacto de las condiciones de beneficio
sobre los compuestos precursores de aroma en granos de cacao (Theobroma cacao L) del clon CCN-
51. Respuestas, ISSN 0122-820X, ISSN-e 2422–5053, Vol 21, No 1, 2016, págs 120–133. 2016;21:
120–133. Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5598206&info=
resumen&idioma=SPA
6. Polanı́a-Hincapié PA, Suárez JC, Hernández HE, Ramón-Triana VY, Cuéllar-Álvarez LN, Casanoves
F. Influence of Fermentation Time on the Chemical and Functional Composition of Different Cocoa
Clones from Southern Colombia. Fermentation 2023, Vol 9, Page 982. 2023;9: 982. https://doi.org/10.
3390/FERMENTATION9110982
7. Niikoi Kotey R, Asomaning Odoom D, Kumah P, Oppong Akowuah J, Fobi Donkor E, Kwatei Quartey
E, et al. Effects of Fermentation Periods and Drying Methods on Postharvest Quality of Cocoa (Theo-
broma Cacao) Beans in Ghana. J Food Qual. 2022; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7871543
8. Sari ABT, Fahrurrozi, Marwati T, Djaafar TF, Hatmi RU, Purwaningsih, et al. Chemical Composition and
Sensory Profiles of Fermented Cocoa Beans Obtained from Various Regions of Indonesia. Int J Food
Sci. 2023;2023. doi:10.1155/2023/5639081
9. Garcı́a-Rincón PA, Núñez-Ramı́rez JM, Bahamón-Monje AF, Garcı́a-Rincón PA, Núñez-Ramı́rez JM,
Bahamón-Monje AF. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of fermented almonds of national
cacao (Theobroma Cacao L.) with addition of probiotics in the amazonic research center, Cimaz Maca-
gual (Caquetá, Colombia). Ingenierı́a y competitividad. 2021; 23. https://doi.org/10.25100/iyc.v23i2.10885
10. De Vuyst L, Leroy F. Functional role of yeasts, lactic acid bacteria and acetic acid bacteria in cocoa fer-
mentation processes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2020; 44: 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/
fuaa014 PMID: 32420601
11. Loo-Miranda JLM, Chire-Fajardo G, Ureña-Peralta MO, Loo-Miranda JLM, Chire-Fajardo G, Ureña-
Peralta MO. Correlation between Electrical Conductivity and the Percentage of Fermented Beans for
Peruvian CCN 51 Cocoa Beans. Ingenierı́a e Investigación. 2022; 42. https://doi.org/10.15446/ING.
INVESTIG.92556
12. Soares TF, Oliveira MBPP. Cocoa by-products: characterization of bioactive compounds and beneficial
health effects. Molecules. 2022; 27: 1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051625 PMID:
35268725
13. Ackah E, Dompey E. Effects of fermentation and drying durations on the quality of cocoa (Theobroma
cacao L.) beans during the rainy season in the Juaboso District of the Western-North Region, Ghana.
Bull Natl Res Cent. 2021; 45: 175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00634-7
14. Alvarez-Villagomez KG, Ledesma-Escobar CA, Priego-Capote F, Robles-Olvera VJ, Garcı́a-Alamilla P.
Influence of the starter culture on the volatile profile of processed cocoa beans by gas chromatography–
mass spectrometry in high resolution mode. Food Biosci. 2022; 47: 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
FBIO.2022.101669
15. Forte M, Currò S, Van de Walle D, Dewettinck K, Mirisola M, Fasolato L, et al. Quality Evaluation of
Fair-Trade Cocoa Beans from Different Origins Using Portable Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS).
Foods. 2023; 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/FOODS12010004/S1
16. Calvo AM, Botina BL, Garcı́a MC, Cardona WA, Montenegro AC, Criollo J. Dynamics of cocoa fermen-
tation and its effect on quality. Scientific Reports 2021 11:1. 2021;11: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41598-021-95703-2 PMID: 34408194
17. Ramı́rez Chamorro LE, Abaunza González CA, Rodrı́guez Polanco L, Varón Devia EH, Barragán Qui-
jano E, Rojas-Molina J. Modelo productivo para el cultivo de cacao (Theobroma cacao) para el departa-
mento del Huila. AGROSAVIA. Mosquera, Colombia: AGROSAVIA; 2020. Available: http://editorial.
agrosavia.co/index.php/publicaciones/catalog/download/29/20/361-1?inline=1
18. Jaimes Suárez YY, Castañeda GAA, Daza EYB, Bustos FM, Silva RAC, Estrada GAR, et al. Modelo
productivo para el cultivo de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) en el departamento de Boyacá. Editorial
AGROSAVIA. 2022. https://doi.org/10.21930/AGROSAVIA.MODEL.7405590
19. Hashmiu I, Agbenyega O, Dawoe E. Determinants of crop choice decisions under risk: A case study on
the revival of cocoa farming in the Forest-Savannah transition zone of Ghana. Land use policy. 2022;
114: 105958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105958
20. De Vuyst L, Weckx S. The cocoa bean fermentation process: from ecosystem analysis to starter culture
development. J Appl Microbiol. 2016; 121: 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13045 PMID: 26743883
21. Papalexandratou Z, Falony G, Romanens E, Jimenez JC, Amores F, Daniel HM, et al. Species Diver-
sity, Community Dynamics, and Metabolite Kinetics of the Microbiota Associated with Traditional Ecua-
dorian Spontaneous Cocoa Bean Fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77: 7698. https://doi.
org/10.1128/AEM.05523-11 PMID: 21926224
22. INCONTEC. NTC-ISO 2292:2021 Cacao en grano. Muestreo. 2021.
23. AOAC. Official Method 991.36, Fat (crude) in meat, solvent extraction (Submersion) method. Off. Meth-
ods Anal. Arlington, VA; 1995.
24. AOAC. International A: Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International. The Association: Arling-
ton County, VA, USA. 2000.
25. Nuñez JM, Bahamón Monje AF, Garcı́a Rincón PA. Caracterı́sticas fisicoquı́micas y sensoriales de
almendras fermentadas de cacao nacional (Theobroma Cacao L.) con adición de probióticos en el cen-
tro de investigaciones amazónicas, Cimaz Macagual (Caquetá, Colombia). Universidad del Valle;
2021. https://doi.org/10.25100/iyc.v23i2.10885
26. Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid
reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965; 16: 144–158.
27. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their
scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999; 64: 555–559.
28. Quiroga Ruiz Y, Herrera Sánchez DA. Efecto de la adición de polifenoles sobre las caracterı́sticas quı́-
micas y sensoriales de un chocolate. Thesis, Universidad Industrial de Santander. 2019. Available:
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/13780
29. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity.
LWT - Food Science and Technology. 1995; 28: 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
30. Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”:
the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996; 239: 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292 PMID:
8660627
31. COEX. Home: International Standards for the Assessment of Cocoa Quality and Flavour. Brigitte Lali-
berté DANV (Bioversity I and SF (RB-E, editor. 2023. Available: https://www.cocoaqualitystandards.org/
32. Kuhn M, Jackson S, Cimentada J. corrr: Correlations in R. R package version 04. 2020; 3: 1–15.
33. Di Rienzo J, Balzarini M, Gonzalez L, Casanoves F, Tablada M, Walter Robledo C. Infostat: software
para análisis estadı́stico. 2010.
34. Wickham H. Programming with ggplot2. 2016; 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_12
35. Kassambara A, Mundt F. Package ‘factoextra.’ Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data
analyses. 2017; 76.
36. Husson F, Josse J, Le S, Mazet J, Husson MF. Package ‘factominer.’ 2008; 96: 698.
37. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC; 2022. Available:
http://www.rstudio.com/
38. Cortez D, Quispe-Sanchez L, Mestanza M, Oliva-Cruz M, Yoplac I, Torres C, et al. Changes in bioactive
compounds during fermentation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) harvested in Amazonas-Peru. Curr Res
Food Sci. 2023; 6: 100494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100494 PMID: 37095830
39. Dewandari KT, Rahmawati R, Munarso SJ. The effect of techniques and fermentation time on cocoa
beans quality (Theobroma cacao L.). IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021; 653: 012046. https://doi.
org/10.1088/1755-1315/653/1/012046
40. Peña González MA, Ortiz Urgiles JP, Santander Pérez FA, Lazo Vélez MA, Caroca Cáceres RS. Physi-
cochemical changes during controlled laboratory fermentation of cocoa (CCN-51) with the inclusion of
fruits and on-farm inoculation. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology. 2023; 26: e2023013. https://doi.
org/10.1590/1981-6723.01323
41. Van de Voorde D, Dı́az-Muñoz C, Hernandez CE, Weckx S, De Vuyst L. Yeast strains do have an
impact on the production of cured cocoa beans, as assessed with Costa Rican Trinitario cocoa fermen-
tation processes and chocolates thereof. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1232323. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fmicb.2023.1232323 PMID: 37621398
42. Alvarez JP. AROMA-PRODUCING YEASTS ASSOCIATED WITH COCOA BEANS FERMENTATION:
STARTER CULTURE SELECTION FOR FLAVOR MODULATION OF CHOCOLATE. Thesis, Universi-
dade Federal do Tocantins. 2017.
43. Korcari D, Fanton A, Ricci G, Rabitti NS, Laureati M, Hogenboom J, et al. Fine Cocoa Fermentation
with Selected Lactic Acid Bacteria: Fermentation Performance and Impact on Chocolate Composition
and Sensory Properties. Foods. 2023; 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12020340 PMID: 36673432
44. Dı́az-Muñoz C, De Vuyst L. Functional yeast starter cultures for cocoa fermentation. J Appl Microbiol.
2022; 133: 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15312 PMID: 34599633
45. Deus VL, Bispo ES, Franca AS, Gloria MBA. Understanding amino acids and bioactive amines changes
during on-farm cocoa fermentation. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2021; 97: 103776.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFCA.2020.103776
46. Lee AH, Neilson AP, O’Keefe SF, Ogejo JA, Huang H, Ponder M, et al. A laboratory-scale model cocoa
fermentation using dried, unfermented beans and artificial pulp can simulate the microbial and chemical
changes of on-farm cocoa fermentation. European Food Research and Technology. 2019; 245: 511–
519. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00217-018-3171-8/FIGURES/5
47. Streule S, Freimüller Leischtfeld S, Galler M, Motzer D, Poulose-Züst M, Miescher Schwenninger S.
Variations in Ecuadorian Cocoa Fermentation and Drying at Two Locations: Implications for Quality and
Sensory. Foods. 2024; 13: 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/FOODS13010137/S1
48. Streule S, Freimüller Leischtfeld S, Chatelain K, Miescher Schwenninger S. Effect of Pod Storage and
Drying Temperature on Fermentation Dynamics and Final Bean Quality of Cacao Nacional in Ecuador.
Foods. 2024; 13: 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101536 PMID: 38790837
49. López-Hernández M del P, Melo-Martinez SE, Criollo-Núñez J. Effect of the maturity stage, genotype,
and geographical location on the physicochemical characteristics of the cocoa bean during fermenta-
tion. INGENIERÍA Y COMPETITIVIDAD. 2023; 25. https://doi.org/10.25100/IYC.V25I2.12503
50. Delgado JD, Mandujano JI, Reátegui D, Ordoñez ES. Desarrollo de chocolate oscuro con nibs de
cacao fermentado y no fermentado: polifenoles totales, antocianinas, capacidad antioxidante y evalua-
ción sensorial. Scientia Agropecuaria. 2018; 9: 543–550. https://doi.org/10.17268/SCI.AGROPECU.
2018.04.10
51. Hernández- Hernández C, López-Andrade PA, Ramı́rez-Guillermo MA, Guerra Ramı́rez D, Caballero
Pérez JF. Evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico.
Food Sci Nutr. 2016; 4: 690–695. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.333 PMID: 27625772
52. Guzmán-Alvarez RE, Márquez-Ramos JG, Guzmán-Alvarez RE, Márquez-Ramos JG. Fermentation of
Cocoa Beans. Fermentation - Processes, Benefits and Risks. 2021 [cited 23 Aug 2023]. https://doi.org/
10.5772/INTECHOPEN.98756
53. Hamdouche Y, Meile JC, Lebrun M, Guehi T, Boulanger R, Teyssier C, et al. Impact of turning, pod stor-
age and fermentation time on microbial ecology and volatile composition of cocoa beans. Food
Research International. 2019; 119: 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.001 PMID:
30884680
54. Solórzano Chavez E, Puyutaxi FA, Jiménez Barragan J, Nicklin C, Miranda SB. Comparación sensorial
del cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) Nacional fino de aroma cultivado en diferentes zonas del Ecuador. dia-
lnet.unirioja.esES Chavez, FA Puyutaxi, JJ Barragan, C Nicklin, SB MirandaRevista Ciencia y Tecnolo-
gı́a, 2015•dialnet.unirioja.es. [cited 19 Jul 2024]. Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?
codigo=5319282
55. Murcia-Artunduaga K, Gasca-Torres L, del Rosario Castañeda M. Evaluación fı́sico-sensorial de
granos de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.), región sur del Huila (Colombia). dialnet.unirioja.es. [cited 19
Jul 2024]. https://doi.org/10.23850/22565035.4358
56. Millena CG, Balonzo ARR, Rentoy JR, Ruivivar SS, Bobiles SC. Effect of fermentation stages on the
nutritional and mineral bioavailability of cacao beans (Theobroma cacao L.). Journal of Food Composi-
tion and Analysis. 2023; 115: 104886.
57. Servent A, Boulanger R, Davrieux F, Pinot M-N, Tardan E, Forestier-Chiron N, et al. Assessment of
cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) butter content and composition throughout fermentations. Food Research
International. 2018; 107: 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.070 PMID: 29580534
58. Afoakwa EO, Quao J, Takrama J, Budu AS, Saalia FK. Chemical composition and physical quality char-
acteristics of Ghanaian cocoa beans as affected by pulp pre-conditioning and fermentation. J Food Sci
Technol. 2013; 50: 1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0446-5 PMID: 24426021
59. Hidayat T, Mulyawanti I. The usage of dried starter for re-fermentation of unfermented cocoa beans.
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2019. p. 012061.
60. Bomdzele E, Molua EL. Assessment of the impact of climate and non-climatic parameters on cocoa pro-
duction: a contextual analysis for Cameroon. Frontiers in Climate. 2023; 5: 1069514. https://doi.org/10.
3389/FCLIM.2023.1069514/BIBTEX
61. Chen X, Wu Y, Zhu H, Wang H, Lu H, Zhang C, et al. Turning over fermented grains elevating heap tem-
perature and driving microbial community succession during the heap fermentation of sauce-flavor bai-
jiu. LWT. 2022; 172: 114173. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LWT.2022.114173
62. JINAP S, DIMICK PS. Acidic Characteristics of Fermented and Dried Cocoa Beans from Different
Countries of Origin. J Food Sci. 1990; 55: 547–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2621.1990.
TB06806.X
63. Jonfia-Essien WA, West G, Alderson PG, Tucker G. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of hybrid
variety cocoa beans. Food Chem. 2008; 108: 1155–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.12.
001 PMID: 26065784
64. Urbańska B, Kowalska J. Comparison of the Total Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Activity of Choc-
olate Obtained from Roasted and Unroasted Cocoa Beans from Different Regions of the World. Antioxi-
dants. 2019; 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8080283 PMID: 31390779
65. Lund MN, Ray CA. Control of Maillard reactions in foods: Strategies and chemical mechanisms. J Agric
Food Chem. 2017; 65: 4537–4552. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00882 PMID: 28535048
66. Oracz J, Nebesny E. Effect of roasting parameters on the physicochemical characteristics of high-
molecular-weight Maillard reaction products isolated from cocoa beans of different Theobroma cacao L.
groups. European Food Research and Technology. 2019; 245: 111–128.
67. Misnawi, Selamat J, Bakar J, Saari N. Oxidation of polyphenols in unfermented and partly fermented
cocoa beans by cocoa polyphenol oxidase and tyrosinase. J Sci Food Agric. 2002;82: 559–566. doi:10.
1002/JSFA.1075
68. Lin T, Chen L, Yang X, Fu C, Yuk H-G, Fan R, et al. Sensory Nutrition and Bitterness and Astringency
of Polyphenols. Biomolecules 2024, Vol 14, Page 234. 2024;14: 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/
BIOM14020234 PMID: 38397471
69. Brillouet JM, Hue C. Fate of proanthocyanidins and anthocyanins along fermentation of cocoa seeds
(Theobroma cacao L.). Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality. 2017; 90: 141–146. doi:https://doi.
org/10.5073/JABFQ.2017.090.017
70. Bauer D, de Abreu JP, Oliveira HSS, Goes-Neto A, Koblitz MGB, Teodoro AJ. Antioxidant activity and
cytotoxicity effect of cocoa beans subjected to different processing conditions in human lung carcinoma
cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7428515 PMID: 27034742
71. Krähmer A, Engel A, Kadow D, Ali N, Umaharan P, Kroh LW, et al. Fast and neat–Determination of bio-
chemical quality parameters in cocoa using near infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2015; 181: 152–
159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.084 PMID: 25794734
72. Mehrabani S, Arab A, Mohammadi H, Amani R. The effect of cocoa consumption on markers of oxida-
tive stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies. Complement Ther Med.
2020; 48: 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102240 PMID: 31987247
73. Hu S, Kim B-Y, Baik M-Y. Physicochemical properties and antioxidant capacity of raw, roasted and
puffed cacao beans. Food Chem. 2016; 194: 1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.
126 PMID: 26471657
74. da Silva Oliveira C, Fonseca Maciel L, Spı́nola Miranda M, da Silva Bispo E. Phenolic compounds, fla-
vonoids and antioxidant activity in different cocoa samples from organic and conventional cultivation.
British Food Journal. 2011; 113: 1094–1102.
75. Cuellar-Álvarez L, Cuellar-Álvarez N, Galeano-Garcı́a P, Suárez-Salazar JC. Effect of fermentation
time on phenolic content and antioxidant potential in Cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum (Willd. ex
Spreng.) K. Schum.) beans. Acta Agron. 2017; 66: 473–479.
76. Zzaman W, Bhat R, Yang TA. Effect of superheated steam roasting on the phenolic antioxidant proper-
ties of cocoa beans. J Food Process Preserv. 2014; 38: 1932–1938.
77. Gu F, Tan L, Wu H, Fang Y, Xu F, Chu Z, et al. Comparison of Cocoa Beans from China, Indonesia and
Papua New Guinea. Foods 2013, Vol 2, Pages 183–197. 2013;2: 183–197. https://doi.org/10.3390/
FOODS2020183 PMID: 28239108
78. ICCO. Who are the Fine and Flavour cocoa exporting countries? Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire; 2020. Available:
https://www.icco.org/fine-or-flavor-cocoa/
79. Romero JMV, Pabón YTM. Caracterı́sticas sensoriales de granos y licor de cacao por un panel de
jueces en entrenamiento. Revista SENNOVA: Revista del Sistema de Ciencia, Tecnologı́a e Innova-
ción. 2020; 5: 27–42.
80. Martı́nez-Guerrero NC, Ligarreto-Moreno GA. Sensory analysis of cacao liquor (Theobroma cacao L.)
in cultivars with different origins grown in the Colombian tropics. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortı́-
colas. 2023; 17: e15876–e15876. https://doi.org/10.17584/RCCH.2023V17I2.15876
81. Portillo E, Labarca M, Grazziani L, Cros E, Assemat S, Davrieux F, et al. Formación del aroma del
cacao Criollo (Theobroma cacao L.) en función del tratamiento poscosecha en Venezuela. Revista
Cientı́fica UDO Agrı́cola. 2009; 9: 458–468.
82. Erazo Solorzano CY, Disca V, Muñoz-Redondo JM, Tuárez Garcı́a DA, Sánchez-Parra M, Carrilo Zen-
teno MD, et al. Effect of Drying Technique on the Volatile Content of Ecuadorian Bulk and Fine-Flavor
Cocoa. Foods. 2023; 12: 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12051065 PMID: 36900586
83. Nazario O, Ordoñez E, Mandujano Y, Arévalo J. Polifenoles totales, antocianinas, capacidad antioxi-
dante de granos secos y análisis sensorial del licor de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) criollo y siete
clones. RevIA. 2018; 3.
84. Rodriguez-Campos J, Escalona-Buendı́a HB, Orozco-Avila I, Lugo-Cervantes E, Jaramillo-Flores ME.
Dynamics of volatile and non-volatile compounds in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) during fermentation
and drying processes using principal components analysis. Food Research International. 2011; 44:
250–258.
85. Cedeño P. Determinación de perfiles organolépticos en ocho grupos de cacao mediante la degustación
de licor de cacao y chocolates oscuros elaborados artesanalmente. Calceta, Ecuador Carrera de
Agroindustria Escuela Superior Politécnica Agropecuaria de Manabı́. 2010.
86. Machado Cuellar L, Ordoñez Espinosa CM, Angel Sánchez YK, Guaca Cruz L, Suárez Salazar JC.
Organoleptic quality assessment of Theobroma cacao L. in cocoa farms in northern Huila, Colombia.
Acta Agron. 2018; 67: 46–52.
87. de Andrade AB, da Cruz ML, de Souza Oliveira FA, Soares SE, Druzian JI, de Santana LRR, et al. Influ-
ence of under-fermented cocoa mass in chocolate production: Sensory acceptance and volatile profile
characterization during the processing. Lwt. 2021; 149: 112048.
88. Tee Y, Bariah K, Hisyam Zainudin B, Samuel Yap K, Ong N. Impacts of cocoa pod maturity at harvest
and bean fermentation period on the production of chocolate with potential health benefits. J Sci Food
Agric. 2022; 102: 1576–1585. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11494 PMID: 34405409
89. Rodrı́guez Silva LG, Quintana Fuentes LF, Coronado Silva RA, Garcı́a Jerez A, Baez Daza EY, Agu-
delo-Castañeda GA. Caracterización fı́sica y sensorial de 24 genotipos especiales de cacao Theo-
broma cacao. Revista UDCA Actualidad & Divulgación Cientı́fica. 2023; 26: 1–11.
90. Santander Muñoz M, Rodrı́guez Cortina J, Vaillant FE, Escobar Parra S. An overview of the physical
and biochemical transformation of cocoa seeds to beans and to chocolate: Flavor formation. Crit Rev
Food Sci Nutr. 2020; 60: 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1581726 PMID:
30896305