Engineering Hydrology
Engineering Hydrology
Engineering Hydrology
• Evaporation, E
• Transpiration, T
• Precipitation, P
• Surface runoff, R
• Groundwater flow, G
• Infiltration, I
Hydrologic Budget
ET = P – R
Total Precipitation
Evap. Evap.
If pervious
Aquifers
Direct RO
Measurement of Precipitation
• Spatial Representation
• Temporal Representation
Spatial Representation
0.8
0.7
Incremental Rainfall (in per 5 min)
0.6
0.5
P
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150
Time
Time (min)
Rainfall Hyetograph
Cumulative Rainfall
10
7
Cumulative Rainfall (in.)
P6
5
3.07 in
4 8.2 in
3 30 min
5.56 in
2
1 1 hr
2 hr
0
0 30 60 90 120 150
Time
Time (min.)
• Arithmetic Mean
• Thiessen Polygon Method
• Isohyetal Method
Areal Precipitation
E
B
A
First Step: Connect the Closest Points
E
B
A
Second Step: Identify the Midpoint of each
segment
C
E
B
A
Third Step: Extend perpendicular lines from
the segments
C
E
B
A
Fourth Step: Compute the Area of each
Polygon
C
Gage Area
D (ac)
A 81
B 67
C 17
E
B D 89
E 153
F F 30
A
Fifth Step: Compute the Average Rainfall
over the Watershed
Pi*Ai/At
Gage Pi (in) Ai (ac) Ai/At (%)
(in)
A 2.20 81 0.185 0.41
B 3.22 67 0.153 0.49
C 0.71 17 0.039 0.027
D 2.49 89 0.204 0.51
E 0.88 153 0.350 0.31
F 6.72 30 0.069 0.46
1 2.21 in
At = S Ai = 437
Arithmetic mean
(2.1+3.1+5.2+3.8+4.5+5.4+3.3)/7
=3.91 in
1 2 3 10
P = 2”
P = 1.8” P = 1.2”
P = 1”
First Step: Interpolate Isohyets
P = 2” 2”
1.8”
1.6”
1.4”
P = 1.8” P = 1.2” 1.2”
1”
P = 1”
Second Step: compute areas that intersects
isohyets and watershed divide
P = 2” 2”
1.8”
1.6” Isohyetal Area
1.4”
(in) (mi2)
P = 1.8” P = 1.2” 1.2”
1” 2 4.72
1.8 2.36
1.6 3.068
P = 1” 1.4 4.012
1.2 3.54
1 5.9
TOTAL 23.6
Third Step: Calculate Average
Precipitation
P = 2” 2”
1.8”
1.6” Isohyet Area Pav Ai x
1.4”
al (in) (mi2) (in) Pav (in)
P = 1.8” P = 1.2” 1.2”
1” 2 4.72 1.9 8.97
1.8 2.36 1.7 4.01
1.6 3.07 1.5 4.60
P = 1” 1.4 4.01 1.3 5.22
1.2 3.54 1.1 3.89
1 5.9 0.9 5.31
TOTAL 23.6 1.4 32.0
Missing Precipitation
Normal Ratio Method
P1, N1
P2, N2
P3, N3
PX, NX
Inverse distance weighting
• Prediction at a point is more
influenced by nearby
measurements than that by P1=10
distant measurements
• The prediction at an ungauged
point is inversely proportional to P2= d1=25
the distance to the 20 d =15
measurement points 2
P3=
• Steps d =10
30
3
– Compute distance (di) from p
ungauged point to all N Pi
measurement points.
2
i 1 d i
Pˆ
N
1
2
i 1 d i
10 20 30
2
2
2
Pˆ 25 15 10 25.24 mm
– Compute the precipitation at 1 1 1
2 2
the ungaged point using the 2
25 15 10
following formula
Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curves
Procedure
From rainfall measurements, for every year of record,
determine the annual maximum rainfall intensity for
specific durations (or the annual rainfall depth over the
specific durations. Common durations for design
applications are: 5-min, 10-min, 15-min, 30-min, 1-hr, 2-
hr, 6-hr, 12-hr, and 24-hr.
Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curves
Direct Methods
Class-A pan
Indirect Methods
Hydrological budget
Empirical methods
Estimating Evaporation
Direct Method: Pan Evaporation
Filled to 8 inches and observed daily.
Plus a rain gage, thermometer for water
temp, and a psychrometer for air
temperature and wet bulb temperature
(calculations reveal dewpoint Td)
Class A Evaporation Pan
Estimating Evaporation
Direct Method: Pan Evaporation
EL = K pan × E pan
where: EL = Lake evaporation or evaporation from water body
K pan = Pan coefficient
E pan = Evaporation from the pan
Most hydrologists suggest multiplying the pan evaporation by 0.75 to correct for
lakes.
Evapotranspiration E + T
The pan actually measures evaporation, not evapo-
transpiration.
You have to multiply the pan evaporation by a
different pan coefficient to estimate the E+T over
plants
http://www.eijkelkamp.com/Portals/2/Eijkelkamp/Fil
es/Manuals/M4-1689e%20Evaporation%20pan.pdf
Example
Type of pan: Class A evaporation pan
Water depth in pan on day 1 = 150 mm
Rainfall (during 24 hours) = 1 mm
Water depth in pan on day 2 = 144 mm (after 24 hours)
Formula: E = K pan × E pan
K pan = 0.75, E pan = start + rain - finish
Calculation: E pan = (150 + 1 – 144) = 7 mm/day
E = 0.75 × 7 =5.2 mm/day
Estimating Evaporation
Indirect Methods
Solution of evaporation from free water surface can
be found indirectly by the following techniques:
I – O = ∆S/∆t
Mass transfer method
u = speed of wind
Rn – H – G - ρw λ Er = 0
Where
Rn = net radiation flux at the surface
H = sensible heat flux to air (+ when air is warming)
G = sensible heat flux to soil or water (+ if soil or water is warming)
ρw λ = latent heat flux (+ during evaporation)
Er = evaporation by energy balance method
The Penman-Kohler Nomograph
The Penman Equation combines mass transfer
and energy budget methods, but deliberately
avoids energy budget terms that are difficult to
measure. Because of its complexity, most of the
time we use Kohler’s graphic Nomograph of the
Penman equation to calculate evaporation.
Use this Nomograph to
estimate shallow lake
evaporation.
Upper left T air = 70F and daily radiation 650 ly /day (langleys /day,1 langley = 1 calorie/cm2)
Upper right, the dew point Td = 50oF and Tair = 70oF
Lower right, Td = 50F and avg wind speed = 40 miles/day measured 6 inches above pan rim
Lower left, intersection of vertical from upper left and horizontal from lower right
Estimates daily pan evaporation in hundreds of inches = 0.22 inches.
Full page
Penman-Kohler Nomograph
CE363
Engineering Hydrology
Infiltration
Infiltration
Rainwater that soaks into the ground and may reach the
groundwater table.
Infiltration
t
F (t ) f ( )d
0
Horton’s Infiltration Model
i>f
Horton’s Infiltration Model
The infiltration decreases exponentially with time
and ultimately reaches a constant rate
Where
ft is the infiltration rate at time t;
f0 is the initial infiltration rate or maximum infiltration rate;
fc is the constant or equilibrium infiltration rate after the soil
has been saturated or minimum infiltration rate; NOTE e is a
number, ~ 2.718
k is the decay constant specific to the soil.
the f’s have units in/hr and k is a time constant hr -1
Horton’s Infiltration Model for soil capacity
))$*
+ , -
-))$*
"#)$*
., /
0
1 %
1 "2
) "
1 "
3 /$2
. /, /
/
/
+ /,
4 / / 56!6)
4"#"$%56!6)%
., / /
% %
7
%#%!*$%
7 /$2*$%%$!*
!
Solution:
Computation of rainfall depth and intensity
Hyetograph
2
Rainfall intensity (in/hr)
1.5
0.5
0
10 20 30 40 50
Time (min)
(b) The maximum 10 min intensity = (0.3*60)/10 = 1.8 in/hr
(c) The maximum 30 min intensity = (0.75*60)/30 = 1.5 in/hr
(d) Total depth of rainfall = 0.9 in
= 497.89 Pa = 4.98 mb
e2m = es* Rh = 497.89*0.4 =199.16 Pa = 1.99 mb
E = 0.0119*2.24*(4.98-1.99) cm/day = 0.08 cm/day
Solution:
CE 363
Engineering Hydrology
Lecture 6: Infiltration exercise problems
Problem 1
According to field measurements, a watershed of interests is capable of infiltrating at a
rate of 2.6 in/hr at the beginning of a storm. By the end of the storm, it can only infiltrate
at ⅕ of the initial rate. Plot the infiltration rate versus time for the first 8 hours after the
storm starts. Assume the decay constant is 0.34 hr-1. How long after the storm the
infiltration rate will be ½ of the initial rate? When the infiltration rate will be ⅓ of the
initial rate?
Solution:
As we know,
Here,
The infiltration rate at time t, ft in/hr
The initial infiltration rate or maximum infiltration rate, f0 = 2.6 in/hr
The constant or equilibrium infiltration rate after the soil, fc = (⅕) f0 = 0.52 in/hr
The decay constant, k = 0.34 hr-1
So,
ft = 0.52+(2.6-0.52)e-0.34t = 0.52+2.08e-0.34t
Using this equation, the time dependent infiltration rate can be found
Time Infiltration 3
(hr) rate, (in/hr)
2.5
Infiltration rate (in/Hr)
0 2.6
1 2.000482 2
2 1.573763
1.5
3 1.270037
4 1.053854 1
5 0.899982
6 0.79046 0.5
7 0.712505
0
8 0.657019 0 2 4 6 8
Time (hour)
When,
ft = (½)f0 = 1.3 in/hr
When,
ft = (1/3)f0 = 0.867 in/hr
Problem 2
Use the values in problem 1 to derive the volume (depth) of water infiltrated versus
time. Plot this equation. Approximately how long after the storm, 1 inch of water will
be infiltrated? How long for 5.5 inches?
Solution:
Volume can be found by integrating the infiltration equation
SO, V = ʃ ʃ
ft dt = (0.52+2.08 e-0.34t) dt
Integrating between 0 to t
. .
=[ . + ]
− .
.
So, V = [ . − . ]
.
So, V = . − . + .
Using this equation, the time dependent infiltration depth can be found.
Infiltration
Time
volume, V 12
(hr)
Infiltration depth (in)
(in) 10
0 0 8
1 2.283389 6
2 4.058517 4
3 5.47188 2
4 6.627749 0
5 7.600342 0 2 4 6 8
6 8.442484 Time (hour)
7 9.191776
8 9.874978
For V = 1 inch
1= 0.52t-6.118 e-0.34t+6.118
» t= 0.4 hr
For V = 5.5 inch
5.5= 0.52t-6.118 e-0.34t+6.118
» t= 3.022 hr
Փ – Index Model
Փ – Index Model assumes infiltration volume resulted from a constant infiltration rate.
It assumes a high initial infiltration is balanced by a low later infiltration.
Problem 3
A 50 acre watershed has a total runoff volume of 130,000 ft3 after the storm recorded
in the table below. What is the phi-index for this watershed?
Here,
Area = 50 acre = (50×43560) ft2 = 2178000 ft2
Runoff volume = 130000 ft3
So, runoff depth, R = (130000/2178000) = 0.05968 ft = 0.716 in
Trial 1
Assume that rainfall intensity during the whole time was greater than φ
R= P – φ t
So, φ = (P-R)/t = (6.95-0.716)/10 =0.6234 in/hr
1 C2 C3 C4= C3*C2 C5 = C4-0.6234*C2
Time Precipitation Revised
interval intensity Precipitation, Runoff,
Time (hr) (in/hr) P (in) Runoff, R (in) R (in)
1 1 0.1 0.1 -0.5234 0
2 1 0.25 0.25 -0.3734 0
3 1 0.8 0.8 0.1766 0.1766
4 1 1.3 1.3 0.6766 0.6766
5 1 1.3 1.3 0.6766 0.6766
6 1 1.5 1.5 0.8766 0.8766
7 1 0.6 0.6 -0.0234 0
8 1 0.5 0.5 -0.1234 0
9 1 0.3 0.3 -0.3234 0
10 1 0.1 0.1 -0.5234 0
Total 2.4064
Trial 3
Φ = (1.3+1.3+1.5-0.716)/3 = 1.128 in/hr
C1 C2 C3 C4= C3*C2 C5 = C4-1.128*C2
Time Precipitation Revised
interval intensity Precipitation, Runoff,
Time (hr) (in/hr) P (in) Runoff, R (in) R (in)
1 1 0.1 0.1 -1.028 0
2 1 0.25 0.25 -0.877 0
3 1 0.8 0.8 -0.328 0
4 1 1.3 1.3 0.172 0.172
5 1 1.3 1.3 0.172 0.172
6 1 1.5 1.5 0.372 0.372
7 1 0.8 0.8 -0.328 0
8 1 0.5 0.5 -0.628 0
9 1 0.3 0.3 -0.828 0
10 1 0.1 0.1 -1.028 0
Total 0.716
Rainfall-Runoff Analysis
Hydrographs
Hydrograph: continuous plot of instantaneous discharge.
Flow rate (cfs or cms) vs. time
The only steady contribution to the water in a channel during dry spells is coming
from subsurface flow, the base flow. During a storm, flow in the stream increases
due to runoff, then gradually decreases to some minimum value. The minimum is
from base flow.
The Watershed Response
Hydrograph
As rain falls over a watershed area, a certain portion will infiltrate
the soil. Some water will evaporate to atmosphere.
Notice the
hyetograph
and hydrograph
areas are in
different scales
The inflection point on the falling limb is assumed to be the point where direct
runoff (DRO) ends.
Baseflow Separation
Separation by Recession Curve Approach
Separation by Arbitrary Approach
Recession Curve Approach
Inflection point
Arbitrary Approach
Arbitrary Approach
Arbitrary Approach
Arbitrary Approach
N = aA0.2
=
=
Direct runoff
Baseflow
CE363
Engineering Hydrology
Flow Routing
Flow Routing Q
• Procedure to t
t
2
Why route flows?
3
Types of flow routing
• Lumped/hydrologic
– Flow is calculated as a function of time alone at a
particular location
– Governed by continuity equation and flow/storage
relationship
• Distributed/hydraulic
– Flow is calculated as a function of space and time
throughout the system
– Governed by continuity and momentum equations
4
Hydrologic Routing
Discharge I (t ) Discharge
Inflow
Transfer Q(t )
Function
Outflow
dS
I (t ) Q(t ) Q and S are unknown
dt
Storage can be expressed as a function of I(t) or Q(t) or both
dI dQ
S f (I , , , Q, , )
dt dt
For a linear reservoir, S=kQ
5
Lumped Flow Routing
Three types:
1. Level pool method (Modified Puls)
– Storage is nonlinear function of Q
2. Muskingum method
– Storage is linear function of I and Q
3. Series of reservoir models
– Storage is linear function of Q and its time
derivatives
6
S and Q relationships
7
Level Pool Routing
• Procedure for calculating outflow hydrograph
Q(t) from a reservoir with horizontal water
surface, given its inflow hydrograph I(t) and
storage-outflow relationship
8
Level Pool Methodology
dS
Discharge
Inflow I (t ) Q(t )
dt
I j 1
Outflow S j 1 ( j 1) t ( j 1) t
Ij dS Idt Qdt
Q j 1 Sj jt jt
Qj
t S j 1 S j I j 1 I j Q j 1 Q j
jt ( j 1) t Time t 2 2
Storage 2S j 1 2S j
Q j 1 I j 1 I j Qj
t t
Unknown Known
S j 1 Need a function relating
2S
Sj Q, and Q
t
9
Time Storage-outflow function
Level Pool Methodology
• Given
– Inflow hydrograph
– Q and H relationship
• Steps
1. Develop Q versus Q+ 2S/t relationship using
Q/H relationship
2 S j 1 2S j
2. Compute Q+ 2S/t using t Q j 1 I j 1 I j t Q j
3. Use the relationship developed in step 1 to get Q
10
Example
Given I(t) Given Q/H
Time Inflow Elevation H Discharge Q
(min) (cfs) (ft) (cfs)
0 0 0 0
10 60 0.5 3
20 120 400 1 8
30 180 1.5 17
40 240 2 30
50 300 300 2.5 43
60 360 3 60
Inflow (cfs)
70 320 3.5 78
80 280 4 97
200
90 240 4.5 117
100 200 5 137
110 160 5.5 156
120 120 100 6 173
130 80 6.5 190
140 40 7 205
150 0 0 7.5 218
160 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 8 231
170 0 8.5 242
180 0 Tim e (m in) 9 253
190 0 9.5 264
200 0 10 275
210 0
11
Solution
Step 1
Develop Q versus 2S/t+Q and Q versus 2S/t-Q, relationship using Q/H relationship
2S 2 21780
Q 3 75.6 cfs
t 10 60
300
200
150
100
50
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000
2S/ t + Q (cfs)
12
Solution
Step 2
2 S j 1 2S j
Compute Q+ 2S/t using Q j 1 I j 1 I j Qj
t t
13
Solution
Step 3 300
250
Outflow Q (cfs)
200
compute Q 100
50
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000
2S/ t + Q (cfs)
(260.4−200.8)
2S/t - Q = 200.8 + (17.1-17)= 201.1
(30−17)
15
Results 2 S j 1
Q j 1 I j 1 I j
2S j
Qj
t t
16
Results
12.0
10.0
Outflow
8.0
Storage (acre-ft)
hydrograph
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
Time (minutes) 400
350
Inflow
300
Discharge (cfs)
Peak outflow intersects with the 250
150
100 Outflow
50
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
TIme (minutes)
17
Q/H Relationships
http://www.wsi.nrcs.usda.gov/products/W2Q/H&H/Tools_Models/Sites.html
Program for Routing Flow through
18 an NRCS Reservoir
CE363
Engineering Hydrology
Flow Routing
(Muskingum Method)
Muskingum Method
The Muskingum method was developed by McCarthy (1938) and utilizes the continuity equation and a
storage relationship that depends on both inflow and outflow.
The storage within the reach at a given time can be expresses by (Chow, 1959):
Wedge and
Prism
Storage
• Positive wedge I>Q
• Maximum S when I = Q
• Negative wedge I<Q
Hydrologic river routing
(Muskingum Method)
Wedge storage in reach
I
S Prism KQ Advancing Q
Flood
S Wedge KX ( I Q ) Wave
I>Q
I Q
K = travel time of peak through the reach
X = weight on inflow versus outflow (0 ≤ X ≤ 0.5) Q Q
X = 0 Reservoir, storage depends on outflow, no
wedge
X = 0.5 yields equal weight to inflow and outflow,
which results in pure translation of the wave
X = 0.0 - 0.3 Natural stream. A typical value for I Q
most natural streams is x=0.2
Receding
S KQ KX ( I Q) Flood QI
Wave
Q>I
S K [ XI (1 X )Q] I I
CE363
Engineering Hydrology
Peak Flow Estimation
(Rational Method)
The Rational Method
In some engineering designs such as design storm water-sewer system, estimates of peak
flow rate from a small basin is required. Hydrologic methods including the rational method is
employed to estimate peak flow used for such designs.
The underlying assumption of the rational method is that a catchment area has a specific time
of concentration which is defined as the time needed for water to travel from the most remote
point of the area to travel through the outlet. The basic equation of the rational method is:
Q = CiA
where:
Q is the peak flow (cfs)
i is the aveage rainfall intensity (inlhr)
C is runoff (rational) coefficient and
A is the area of the watershed (acres).
Q = 0.278 CiA
The Rational Method
(Assumptions and limitations)
The Rational Method
(Assumptions and limitations)
The Rational Method
(Runoff Coefficient, C)
The
Rational
Method
(Runoff Coefficient, C)
The Rational Method
(Rainfall Intensity, i)
The
Rational • The time required
for the flow to
Method move from the
furthest point of
the watershed to
the outlet.
(Time of
Concentration, tc) • Tc = T(overland) +
T(sewer or pipe)
Overland Time
The
Rational
Method
(Time of
Concentration,
tc)
Sewer or Pipe time
The
Rational
Method
(Time of
Concentration, tc)
The Rational Method
(Time of Concentration, tc)
The Rational Method:
1 0.2
EXAMPLE 2 0.35
3 0.8
4 0.9
An urban watershed is
shown along with the
travel paths from the most
remote points in each
subareas. The details of
the subareas are given in
the accompanied Table.
Use the provided IDF curve
with Kirpich formula to
determine the 20-yr peak
flow at the drainage outlet
G.
1. Travel time by paths:
2. Possible routes:
a. AE+EF+FG=8.8+8.1+9.1=26 min ← Tc (highest value)
b. CE+EF+FG=7.5+8.1+9.1=24.7 min
c. BF+FG=10.2+9.1=19.3 min
d. DF+FG=7.4+9.1=16.5 min
3. From the IDF curve, for 20-year frequency and Tc of 26 min, i = 6.5 in/hr
4
Area Area Drained C ac(acres) ∑aC(acres)
(acres)
1 14 0.2 2.8 2.8
2 12.5 0.35 4.38 7.18
3 11.1 0.8 8.88 16.06
4 8.5 0.9 7.65 23.71
5
Q=i∑aC=6.5*23.71= 154.12 cfs
Example
Solution
Solution
Solution
Class Example
RATIONAL METHOD
Frequency Analysis
Introduction
Hydrologic Models
70
40
20
60 Interval
Interval = 25,000
= 10,000 cfscfs
30
15
50
40
No. of
20
10
No.
30
1020
5
10
0
00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 00 400 50 450 00 500
0 05 50 50
10 100100
15 150
15020 200
20025 250
25030 300
300 35 350 4 400 4 450 5 500
Annual 3 3 3cfs)
Annualmm
Annual m ax
ax
ax flow
flow (10
flow(10
(10cfs)cfs)
Dividing the number of occurrences with the total number of points will give Probability
Mass Function
Probability density function
• Continuous form of probability mass function is probability
density function
0.9
100
90
0.8
80
0.7
occurences
70
0.6
Probability
60
0.5
50
0.4
40
No. of
0.3
30
0.2
20
0.1
10
00
0 0 50
100 100 150
200 200 300
250 300 400350 400500450 500
600
3 3
Annualmm
Annual axaxflow
flow(10
(10 cfs)
cfs)
Cumulative Distribution Function
(CDF)
• Cumulate the pdf to produce a CDF
• CDF describes the probability that a random variable is less
than or equal to specified value of x
1
P (Q ≤ 50000) = 0.8
0.8
P (Q ≤ 25000) = 0.4
Probability
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Annual m ax flow (103 cfs)
Probability distributions
• Normal family
– Normal, lognormal, lognormal-III
• Generalized extreme value family
– EV1 (Gumbel), GEV, and EVIII (Weibull)
• Exponential/Pearson type family
– Exponential, Pearson type III, Log-Pearson type III
Probability Distributions Commonly Used in Hydrology
Frequency Analysis
(Graphical Solution)
• Probability plot is a graphical tool to assess
whether or not the data fits a particular
distribution.
• The data are fitted against a theoretical
distribution in such as way that the points should
form approximately a straight line (distribution
function is linearized)
• Departures from a straight line indicate
departure from the theoretical distribution
Frequency Analysis
(Graphical Solution)
The method involves fitting of a an assumed probability distribution to
observed data.
Data should be first ranked in order of decreasing magnitude. Thus, the value
represents the maximum magnitude in record. Once the data ranked in
decreasing order, the plotting position or return period can be computed.
There are different ways which the plotting position can be found. The most
common plotting position in hydrology is Weibull formula:
𝑛+1
𝑇=
𝑚
where
T = Return period
n = Number of values (total observations)
m = rank of decreasing values with largest equal to 1.0
Frequency Analysis
(Graphical Solution)
1
Then, the observed values and their exceedance probabilities (i.e. 𝑃 = ) are
𝑇
plotted on the probability paper corresponding to the assumed probability
distribution.
Frequency Analysis
(Mathematical Model or Frequency Factors )
KT Frequency factor
x
KT s
T Return period P( X xT )
1
T
x Sample mean
s Sample standard deviation xT x
Distribution Characteristics
(Central Tendency)
(a) Mean or Arithmetic Average
1 n
X xi
n i 1
(b) Median:
is the middle value of the observed data and divide the distribution into
equal areas.
𝑥𝑛/2 +𝑥 𝑛
𝑥𝑛+1 +1
2
𝑥= 2
if “n” is odd OR 𝑥= 2
if “n” is even
(c) Mode:
Mode is the value occurring most frequently OR with the greatest
frequency in discrete variables. In continuous variables it is the peak
value of probability density. The mode may not exist and when it does it is
not necessary unique.
Distribution Characteristics
(Variability)
(a) Standard Deviation (S) or (σ):
It represents the average deviation about the mean.
𝑛
𝑖=1(𝑥𝑖− 𝑥)
𝑆=
(𝑛 − 1)
where n = number of observations
𝑥 = mean
Graphical Solution
Normal Probability Plot
• Steps
1. Rank the data from largest (m = 1) to smallest (m = n)
2. Assign plotting position to the data (Weibull Formula)
T = (N+1)/m
P is the exceedance probability
Normal Probability Paper
Exceedance Probability (%)
Example 1
(Normal Distribution)
Assuming normal distribution, make a
frequency analysis of the annual
maximum flood measured at a local
valley. Plot the data using the Weibull
plotting position formula. Based on the
frequency curve and the mathematical
equation estimate the following:
(a) The 20-year annual maximum; and
(b) The exceedance probability and
return period for an event of 5500
cfs.
Solution
(Graphical Method)
Raw Data
No. Max. Flood Rank Max. Flood Return Period (T) Probability (P=1/T)
(cfs) (cfs) (%)
1 4210 1 7230 23.00 4.35
2 2010 2 5220 11.50 8.70
3 5010 3 5170 7.67 13.04
4 4290 4 5010 5.75 17.39
5 3720 5 4290 4.60 21.74
6 2920 6 4280 3.83 26.09
7 2500 7 4210 3.29 30.43
8 2110 8 4050 2.88 34.78
9 3110 9 3860 2.56 39.13
10 2420 10 3720 2.30 43.48
11 4280 11 3650 2.09 47.83
12 3860 12 3590 1.92 52.17
13 3150 13 3260 1.77 56.52
14 4050 14 3150 1.64 60.87
15 3260 15 3110 1.53 65.22
16 7230 16 2920 1.44 69.57
17 5170 17 2550 1.35 73.91
18 2550 18 2500 1.28 78.26
19 5220 19 2420 1.21 82.61
20 3650 20 2110 1.15 86.96
21 3590 21 2010 1.10 91.30
22 650 22 650 1.05 95.65
Avg. 3589.091
STDV. 1380.572
Solution
(Normal Probability Plot)
Solution
(Using the Frequency Curve)
(a)
For 20-yrs, the exceedance probability = (1/20)=5%.
From the normal probability curve, the corresponding flow is
approximately = 5860 cfs.
(b)
From the curve, when Q=5500 cfs, the exceedance
probability = 0.0859.
Thus, the return period = (1/0.0859) = 11.6 yrs.
Solution
(Using the Mathematical Model or Frequency Factors)
(a) Rank Max. Flood
(cfs)
1 7230
The general form of the mathematical model is: 2
3
5220
5170
xT x KT s 4
5
5010
4290
6 4280
7 4210
8 4050
9 3860
Avg. 3589.091
STDV. 1380.572
Solution
(Using the Mathematical Model or Frequency Factors)
(a) “Continue”
Using the table with a probability of 0.05 (i.e. P=(1/T) = (1/20) = 0.05) for the 20-yrs.
(b)
For Q=5500 cfs, the value of K = (Q-Qavg)/S=(5500-3589.091)/1380.572=1.384
From table, the corresponding exceedance probability = 0.917
Thus, the exceedance probability =0.083
Therefore, T=(1/P)=(1/0.083)=12.05 yrs.
Example 2
(Log-Normal Distribution)
Assuming log-normal distribution, make a frequency analysis
of the annual maximum flood measured at a local valley. Plot
the data using the Weibull plotting position formula. Based on
the frequency curve and the mathematical equation estimate the
following:
(a) The 20-year annual maximum; and
(b) The exceedance probability and return period for an event
of 5500 cfs.
(a)
For 20-yrs, the exceedance probability = (1/20)=5%.
From the normal probability curve, the corresponding flow (log Q) = 3.86.
Thus, the corresponding flow = 10^(3.86) = 7244 cfs.
(b)
To find the exceedance probability and return period for an event of 5500 cfs, first take
the log of 5500 which is equal to 3.74. Next, enter the normal probability plot with
3.74. From the curve, when log Q= 3.74, the exceedance probability = 0.1470.
Thus, the return period = (1/0.1470) = 6.8 yrs.
Solution
(Using the Mathematical Model or Frequency Factors)
(a) Rank Max. Flood
(cfs)
Log (Q)
1 7230 3.86
The general form of the mathematical model is: 2
3
5220
5170
3.72
3.71
xT x KT s 4
5
5010
4290
3.70
3.63
6 4280 3.63
7 4210 3.62
8 4050 3.61
9 3860 3.59
(b)
For Q=5500 cfs, the value of K = (log Q-(avg log Q))/S=(3.74-3.516)/0.209 = 1.072
From table, the corresponding exceedance probability=0.142
Therefore, T=(1/P)=(1/0.142)=7.04 yrs.
Here,
Aquifer thickness, B = 40 ft
h1 = 60 ft, h2 = 59.2 ft, L = 1000 ft
Hydraulic conductivity, K = 0.03 ft/sec
.
Flow rate, q = = × 0.03 × 40
= 9.6 × ft3/sec per foot width (Ans)
Here,
K = 20 m/day
Aquifer thickness, B = 25 m
h1 = 55 m, h2 = 42 m, L = 2 km = 2000 m
Flow rate, q2 = = × 20 × 25
= 3.25 m3/day per meter width
K = 35 m/day
h1 = (55-25) m = 30 m, h2 = (42-25) m = 17 m, L = 2 km = 2000 m
L = 2 km = 2000 m
Flow rate, q1 = = ×
× 35
= 5.35 m3/day per meter width
Total flow rate, q = q1 + q2 = (3.25+5.35) m3/day per meter width
= 8.60 m3/day per meter width (Ans)
Here,
Q = 0.05 m3/sec, H = 25 m
h1 = (25-3) m = 22 m, h2 = (25-1.2) m = 23.8 m
r1 = 50 m, r2 = 150 m
Hydraulic conductivity, K
× ( . )
→0.05 =
→K = 2.12× m/sec
= 0.021 cm/sec
So, the deposit is clean coarse sand
Radius of influence, R
× ( )
Q=
× . × ×( )
→0.05 =
→R= 327.08 m
Here,
Q = 80 m3/hr = 0.022 m3/sec
rw= 0.5/2 = 0.25 m, H= 33 m
h1 = (33-1.8) m = 31.2 m, h2 = (33-1.1) m = 31.9 m
r1 = 18 m, r2 = 45 m
(a) Transmissivity, T = ?
× ( . . )
→0.022 =
→K = 1.45× 10 m/sec
Now, T = KH = 1.45× 10 × 33 = 4.79× m2/sec
(b) Drawdown, Sw = ?
× . × ( . )
→0.022 =
.
→ℎ = 766.9 → ℎ = 27.69 m
Drawdown, Sw = (H- hw) = (33-27.69) m = 5.31 m
(c) Radius of influence, R = ?
× . × ( . )
→0.022 =
.
→
.
= 5.75
→R =197.64 m
× . × × .
→0.022 =
.
→R = 357.06 m
CE363
Engineering Hydrology
Groundwater Hydrology
Groundwater Hydrology
So far we were concerned with various aspects
of surface hydrology which includes rainfall,
runoff, infiltration, evaporation, …, etc. Now, we
will discuss another process or phase in
hydrologic cycle which is GROUNDWATER.
Groundwater Hydrology
Topics to be covered:
Unconfined Aquifer:
• It is not bounded by an upper confining bed, and it contains water that
is open to the atmosphere. It is also referred to as water-table aquifer.
Basic Definitions
Aquifer Characteristics
1. Intrinsic permeability (k)
2. Hydraulic conductivity (K)
3. Transmissivity (T)
4. Porosity (n)
5. Storage coefficient or Storativity (S)
Permeability (k)
• It is a function of the porous medium only.
• The permeability of a porous medium is a measure of its ability to transmit
fluid under a hydropotential gradient. It is considered to be approximately
proportional to the square of the mean grain diameter:
k = Cd^2
where:
k (L^2) is the permeability or specific permeability.
d is the mean grain diameter
C is a dimensionless constant called “shape factor” depends on
porosity range, distribution of particle size, shapes of grain, etc.
Homogeneity / Non-homogeneity
• Homogeneous medium has properties that are independent of position.
• Non-homogeneous medium has properties that change from position to
another.
• Non-homogeneous medium known as heterogenous.
Hydraulic Conductivity (K)
Typical Hydraulic Conductivities
(for water)
Transmissibility (T)
• Transmissibility of an aquifer (sometimes referred to as Transmissivity) is a
measure of the ability of the aquifer to transmit water through its entire
depth.
• It is expressed in ((𝐿2 /𝑇) and it is equal to the product of hydraulic
conductivity (L/T) and the thickness of the aquifer.
• Transmissibility:
ഥ
𝑇 = 𝐾b
where T=Transmissibility (𝐿2 /𝑇)
ഥ = Average hydraulic conductivity (L/T)
𝑲
b = Thickness of confined aquifer (L)
OR
Average saturated thickness of unconfined aquifer (L)
Transmissibility (T)
When the medium is stratified, two conditions might exist:
• Flow parallel to stratifications:
1
ഥ
𝐾 = 𝐾1 𝑏1 + 𝐾2 𝑏2 + … … . +𝐾𝑛 𝑏𝑛
𝑏
Groundwater Hydrology
Groundwater
Groundwater flows slowly through the voids between grains or the cracks in
solid rock. Much of our knowledge depends on field and laboratory
observations. Here, for example, is an experiment to measure head loss in an
aquifer.
Darcy’s Law
Q = – KA (dh/dL)
Darcy’s allows an estimate of:
• The velocity or flow rate moving within the aquifer
• The average time of travel from the head of the aquifer to a
point located downstream
• Very important for prediction of contaminant plume arrival
Confined Aquifer
Darcy & Seepage Velocity
Q = KA (dh/dL)
Q = 37,500 m /day
3
0.25m/day
• Seepage Velocity: Vs = VD /n =
(0.25) / (0.2) = 1.25 m/day (about 4.1 ft/
day)
30 ft
Example 2
Solution
• Consider 1-ft (i.e. unit) lengths of the river and
small channel. Q = KA [(h1 – h2) / L]
Aquifer
Example 3
Solution
Example 2
Solution
Solution:
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
2 hr 4 hr 6 hr DRH of 4
2 hr 8 hr UH
Time lagged lagged lagged cm in 8 hr
UH (cfs)
(hr) UH UH UH (cfs)=C2+
(cfs) =C6/4
(cfs) (cfs) (cfs) C3+C4+C5
0 0 0 0
1 100 100 25
2 200 0 200 50
3 400 100 500 125
4 300 200 0 500 125
5 200 400 100 700 175
6 100 300 200 0 600 150
7 50 200 400 100 750 187.5
8 0 100 300 200 600 150
9 50 200 400 650 162.5
10 0 100 300 400 100
11 50 200 250 62.5
12 0 100 100 25
13 50 50 12.5
14 0 0 0
Solution:
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
S curve
2 hr
Time S curve S curve lagged 8 hr UH=
UH C4-C5
(hr) addition ordinate by 8 hr C6/(8/2)
(cfs)
(cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
0 0 0 0 0
1 100 100 100 25
2 200 0 200 200 50
3 400 100 500 500 125
4 300 200 500 500 125
5 200 500 700 700 175
6 100 500 600 600 150
7 50 700 750 750 187.5
8 0 600 600 0 600 150
9 750 750 100 650 162.5
10 600 600 200 400 100
11 750 750 500 250 62.5
12 600 600 500 100 25
13 750 750 700 50 12.5
14 600 600 600 0 0
15 750 750 750 0 0
Solution:
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9
Ordinate Ordinate Ordinate Ordinate of
Ordinate of 23 mm of 0 mm of 35 mm (10.5+23+35)
Total Flow
3 hr of 10.5 DRH DRH DRH 68.5 mm
Time Baseflow hydrograph
UH mm DRH lagged by lagged by lagged by DRH lagged
(hr) (m3/s) (m3/s)
(m3/s) (m3/s)= 3 hour 6 hour 9 hour (m3/s) =
=C7+C8
C2*10.5 (m3/s)= (m3/s) (m3/s) = C3+C4+C5+
C2*23 =C2*0 C2*35 C6
1200 0 0 0 10 10
1500 4.7 49.35 0 49.35 10 59.35
1800 7.5 78.75 108.1 0 186.85 11 197.85
2100 5.7 59.85 172.5 0 0 232.35 11 243.35
2400 4.3 45.15 131.1 0 164.5 340.75 11 351.75
0300 3.1 32.55 98.9 0 262.5 393.95 12 405.95
0600 2.4 25.2 71.3 0 199.5 296 12 308
0900 1.4 14.7 55.2 0 150.5 220.4 12 232.4
1200 0.8 8.4 32.2 0 108.5 149.1 13 162.1
1500 0.2 2.1 18.4 0 84 104.5 13 117.5
1800 0 0 4.6 0 49 53.6 13 66.6
2100 0 0 28 28 13 41
2400 0 7 7 13 20
0300 0 0 13 13