The document outlines the objectives and nature of strategy evaluation, emphasizing the importance of reviewing organizational strategies, measuring performance, and taking corrective actions. It introduces the balanced scorecard as a tool to balance financial and non-financial measures in strategy evaluation. Additionally, it discusses the characteristics of an effective evaluation system and the importance of contingency planning for unforeseen circumstances.
The document outlines the objectives and nature of strategy evaluation, emphasizing the importance of reviewing organizational strategies, measuring performance, and taking corrective actions. It introduces the balanced scorecard as a tool to balance financial and non-financial measures in strategy evaluation. Additionally, it discusses the characteristics of an effective evaluation system and the importance of contingency planning for unforeseen circumstances.
Control) CENTRAL LUZON STATE College of Business Administration and Department UNIVERSITY ofAccountancy Business Administration OBJECTIVES
Describe the nature of strategy evaluation
Understand the strategy evaluation framework Explain the balanced scorecard NATURE OF STRATEGY EVALUATION Reviewing Basis of Strategies
Reviewing the underlying bases of an organization’s strategy
could be approached by developing a revised EFE Matrix and IFE Matrix. Measuring Organizational Performance
This activity includes comparing expected results to
actual results, investigating deviations from plans, evaluating individual performance, and examining progress being made toward meeting stated objectives. Taking Corrective Actions
The final activity requires making changes to competitively
reposition a firm for the future. Balanced Scorecard
Derives its name from the perceived need of firms to
“balance” financial measures that are oftentimes used exclusively in strategy evaluation and control with nonfinancial measures such as product quality and customer service. Characteristics of an Effective Evaluation System
Strategy evaluation activities must be economical
Strategy-evaluation activities also should be meaningful Strategy-evaluation activities should provide timely information Strategy evaluation should be designed to provide a true picture of what is happening strategy-evaluation process should not dominate decisions Strategy evaluations should be simple Contingency Planning
If a major competitor withdraws from particular markets
as intelligence reports indicate, what actions should our firm take? If our sales objectives are not reached, what actions should our firm take to avoid profit losses? If demand for our new product exceeds plans, what actions should our firm take to meet the higher demand? Contingency Planning
If certain disasters occur—such as loss of computer
capabilities; a hostile takeover attempt; loss of patent protection; or destruction of manufacturing facilities because of earthquakes, tornadoes or hurricanes—what actions should our firm take? If a new technological advancement makes our new product obsolete sooner than expected, what actions should our firm take? Strategy Monitoring (Review, Evaluation, and Control) CENTRAL LUZON STATE College of Business Administration and Department UNIVERSITY ofAccountancy Business Administration