1-Res2DInv_Manual
1-Res2DInv_Manual
71
with multi-core support
RES2DINVx64 ver. 4.00
with 64-bit support
Notice of Copyright
RES2DINV is copyrighted by Geotomo Software, 2000-2011.
All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced
without written permission of Geotomo Software.
iii
Table of Contents
Topic Page No.
1 Introduction ..............................................................................................1
2 Computer system requirements ................................................................3
3 Copy protection ........................................................................................4
4 Theory.......................................................................................................4
5 Software installation .................................................................................5
6 Using the program – a quick start.............................................................8
7 Data file format.........................................................................................9
7.1 Index based data format .....................................................................10
7.1.1 Wenner, pole-pole, equatorial dipole-dipole arrays ......................10
7.1.2 Schlumberger , dipole-dipole and pole-dipole arrays....................12
7.1.3 Topography data for index based format data files .......................16
7.2 General array data format ..................................................................17
7.3 Remote electrodes of the pole-pole and pole-dipole arrays ...............23
7.4 Cross-borehole data format................................................................27
7.5 I.P. data format...................................................................................35
7.6 Time-lapse data files ..........................................................................38
7.7 Incorporating data noise estimates .....................................................40
7.8 Fixing resistivities..............................................................................42
7.9 Aquatic surveys..................................................................................44
7.9.1 Underwater surveys.......................................................................44
7.9.2 Surveys with floating electrodes ...................................................48
7.10 Incorporating boundaries of known layers........................................50
7.11 Global or GPS coordinates................................................................53
8 File menu options ...................................................................................56
8.1 Read data file .....................................................................................56
8.2 Round up positions of electrodes .......................................................56
8.4 Cut-off factor to remove data.............................................................59
8.5 Calculate errors from repeated readings ............................................59
8.5 Data Import ........................................................................................60
8.6 Collate data into RES3DINV format .................................................60
8.7 Concatenate data into RES2DINV format .........................................62
8.8 Change buffer drive ...........................................................................63
8.9 Save sorted data after reading in data file ..........................................64
8.10 Trace program execution ...................................................................64
9 Edit menu options ...................................................................................65
9.1 Exterminate bad data points...............................................................65
9.2 Splice large data sets..........................................................................65
9.3 Trim large data set .............................................................................68
9.4 Reverse pseudosection .......................................................................68
9.5 Change location of first electrode ......................................................68
iv
References ......................................................................................................141
Appendix A Array types in RES2DINV ................................................145
Appendix B Special OhmMapper Note .................................................147
DISCLAIMER ...............................................................................................148
SUPPORT ......................................................................................................148
What’s New....................................................................................................149
vii
List of Figures
Figure Caption Page No.
1.1 Sequence of measurements to build up a pseudosection 1
using a computer controlled multi-electrode survey
setup.
1.2 Two possible arrangements of the blocks used in a 2-D 2
model together with the data points in the
pseudosection.
7.1 Parameters that specify the location and length of an 10
array in the index based data format.
7.2 Arrangement of electrodes for the equatorial dipole- 11
dipole array
7.3 Arrangement of the electrodes for the dipole-dipole and 13
pole-dipole arrays.
7.4 Arrangement of electrodes for the offset pole-dipole 15
array.
7.5 Some possible non-conventional arrays. 17
7.6 Arrangement of the electrodes along a survey line such 22
that the true horizontal distance between adjacent
electrodes is constant regardless of the slope of the
ground surface.
7.7 A schematic diagram of the arrangement of the 23
electrodes in an actual field pole-pole measurement.
7.8 A schematic diagram of the arrangement of the 25
electrodes along the survey line in a pole-pole survey
with positions of the C2 and P2 electrodes specified.
7.9 Arrangement of the electrodes in a cross-borehole 27
survey.
7.10 The model obtained after the inversion of the 31
BOREHOLE.DAT data set.
7.11 Model obtained from the inversion of data from a 32
cross-borehole survey to map the flow of a saline
tracer.
7.12 Magusi River ore body resistivity and I.P sections. 38
7.13 Fixing the resistivity of rectangular and triangular 43
regions of the inversion model.
7.14 Three possible situations for aquatic surveys. 44
7.15 Hat Head land and underwater survey. 46
7.16 Lake Lelia underwater survey apparent resistivity 46
pseudosection and model resistivity section.
7.17 Models for the Clifton survey from the different 52
viii
List of Tables
Table Caption Pg. No.
5.1 List of files installed with the RES2DINVx32 program. 6
7.1 Example Wenner array data file format. 10
7.2 Example equatorial dipole-dipole array data file. 11
7.3 Example Wenner-Schlumberger array data file. 12
7.4 Example dipole-dipole array data file. 12
7.5 Example pole-dipole array data file. 14
7.6 Example offset pole-dipole array data file. 15
7.7 Example of index based data file with topography. 16
7.8 Example data file with general array format. 18
7.9 Example general array format file with topography. 19
7.10 Example general array data format file with topography 20
in a separate section.
7.11 Example gradient array data file. 23
7.12 Pole-pole data file with remote electrodes specified. 25
7.13 Example borehole data set. 28
7.14 Example data set with inclined boreholes. 33
7.15 Example borehole data set with topography 34
7.16 Example data file with I.P. values as chargeability. 35
7.17 Example time-lapse data set with 3 time series. 39
7.18 Example data file with noise estimates. 40
7.19 Example data file with fixed regions. 42
7.20 Example data file for aquatic survey with bottom 45
electrodes.
7.21 Underwater survey data file in general array format. 47
7.22 Survey data file with floating electrodes. 49
7.23 Example survey data file with known boundaries. 51
7.24 Example data file with global coordinates. 53
7.25 Example data file with index based format and 54
topography and global coordinates.
7.26 Example data file with general array format and 55
topography and global coordinates.
7.27 Example aquatic survey data file with global coordinates. 55
8.1 Example script file to combine 2-D data files into a 3-D 61
data file.
8.2 Example script file to concatenate 2-D data files. 63
11.1 Data file with standard unit electrode spacing. 102
11.2 Data file with half the standard unit electrode spacing. 102
11.3 Example script file for batch mode inversion. 111
A.1 Array types and their number codes. 145
1
1 Introduction
RES2DINVx32 and RES2DINVx64 are computer programs that will
automatically determine a two-dimensional (2-D) resistivity model for the
subsurface for the data obtained from electrical imaging surveys (Dahlin 1996).
It is a Windows based program that also supports multi-core CPUs.
The 2-D model used by the inversion program consists of a large number of
rectangular blocks. Figure 1.2a shows an arrangement of the blocks that
loosely tied to the distribution of the data points in the pseudosection. The
distribution and size of the blocks are automatically generated by the program
using the distribution of the data points as a rough guide. The depth of the
2
Figure 1.2. Two possible arrangements of the blocks used in a 2-D model
together with the data points in the pseudosection.
with 4 gigabytes (GB) of RAM. Besides normal surveys carried out with the
electrodes on the ground surface, the program also supports aquatic and cross-
borehole surveys.
Practically all computers have an in-built power management system that slows
down and eventually shuts down the computer system if the keyboard or mouse
is not accessed after a certain time limit. This can interfere with the operation
of the RES2DINV program if you are inverting a large data set or using the
batch mode to invert a large number of data files. Windows also has an in-built
screen saver functions that replaces the contents of the screen with a screen
saver program. Before running the RES2DINV program, you will need to
disable both the power management and screen saver programs.
There should not be too many background programs running while executing
this program. The active background programs are usually shown on the 'Start'
bar at the bottom of the screen. By shutting down the other programs, more
memory will be available to this program. This will reduce memory to hard-
disk swapping that slows down the program.
4
3 Copy protection
A USB hardware key (dongle) is supplied with the registered version of the
program. You will need to install the driver for the dongle so that the program
can detect it (please refer to section 5 – Software installation). The
demonstration version of the program does not require a hardware key but
some important features of the program cannot be used.
4 Theory
The inversion routine used by the program is based on the smoothness-
constrained least-squares method (deGroot-Hedlin and Constable 1990, Sasaki
1992, Loke et al. 2003). The smoothness-constrained least-squares method is
based on the following equation
(J T
)
J +λF ∆q k = J T g − λFq k ,
(4.1)
where F = α x CTxC x + α z CTzC z
Cx = horizontal roughness filters
Cz = vertical roughness filter
J = Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives
JT = transpose of J
λ = damping factor
q = model change vector
g = data misfit vector
One advantage of this method is that the damping factor and flatness filters can
be adjusted to suit different types of data. A detailed description of the different
variations of the smoothness-constrained least-squares method can be found in
the free tutorial notes by Loke (2011) available on the www.geoelectrical.com
website. The different program options are described in sections 10 and 11.
The optimization method tries to reduce the difference between the calculated
and measured apparent resistivity values by adjusting the resistivity of the
model blocks subject to the smoothness constraints used. A measure of this
difference is given by the root-mean-squared (RMS) error. However the model
with the lowest possible RMS error can sometimes show large and unrealistic
variations in the model resistivity values and might not always be the "best"
model from a geological perspective. In general the most prudent approach is
to choose the model at the iteration after which the RMS error does not change
significantly. This usually occurs between the 3rd and 5th iterations.
5
5 Software installation
If you had purchased the software with a CD, the following setup manager
should be automatically displayed when you insert the CD.
If you had downloaded the programs from the Internet, you will need to install
the programs manually. The RES2DINV package comes in a single
compressed installation file SETUP.EXE that is a Windows based installation
program. The www.geoelectrical.com website also has the driver installation
files for the dongle and the Vcredist programs.
After installing the RES2DINVx32 program, you should find the list of files in
Table 1 in the folder where the program was installed.
6
After checking the computer configuration, the program will then display the
following Main Menu bar near the top of the screen.
9
You can select an option by clicking it with the mouse cursor. If this is the first
time you are using the program, try reading in one of the smaller files such as
the BLOCKDIP.DAT provided with the program. Click the "File" choice,
followed by the “Read data file” menu choice. After that, if necessary,
navigate to the folder where the RES2DINV program is installed. After reading
in the file, go to the “Inversion” option, and then choose the “Carry out
inversion” option. The inversion subroutine will start. Wait for a about a
second for the data to be inverted. If you need to stop the inversion routine at
any time, just click the 'Next' sub-window at the bottom-right of the screen, and
wait for a short while. By default, the program will carry out 6 iterations that
can be increased if necessary.
After the inversion process has been completed, click the “Display” option that
will open up a new window. In the new window, click the “Display sections -
Display data and model sections” sub-option. You will then be asked to
select the iteration number and type of contour intervals. After you have made
the appropriate choices, the program will then display the apparent resistivity
and inversion model sections.
There are two main types of data format used by this program, an index based
and a general array format. The older index based format is only used for
conventional arrays such as the Wenner, Wenner-Schlumberger, pole-pole,
pole-dipole and dipole-dipole arrays. The general array format can be used for
any array, including non-conventional arrays.
10
Figure 7.1. Parameters that specify the location and length of an array in the
index based data format.
The data file BLOCKPOL.DAT gives an example of a pole-pole array data set.
The arrangement of the electrodes for the equatorial dipole-dipole array is
shown in the Figure 7.2.
Table 7.4 describes the data file format for the dipole-dipole array.
In most cases, the 'n' dipole separation factor is an integer value. However it is
possible for the 'n' factor to have non-integer values although all the electrodes
still have a constant inter-electrode spacing. This can occur when the spacing
'a' between the P1-P2 pair is twice (or more) the unit electrode spacing. For the
example shown in Figure 7.3b, the unit electrode spacing for the survey line is
1 meter. The 'a' spacing has a value of 2 meters, while the distance between the
C1 and P1 electrodes is 3 meters. In this case, the 'n' factor has a value of 1.5.
The data file, DIPOLEN5.DAT, gives an example of a dipole-dipole data set
with non-integer 'n' values. For cases where the fractional part of the n factor
has is an infinite series in decimal notation, the 'n' value should be given to at
least four decimal places. For example, if the 'n' value is one and one-third, it
should be given as 1.3333.
If the location of the first electrode is used in the data format, it should be the
leftmost electrode; such as the C2 electrode in Figures 7.3a and 7.3b, C1 in
Figure 7.3c and P2 in Figure 7.3d.
Figure 7.3. Arrangement of the electrodes for the dipole-dipole and pole-dipole
arrays. (a) Dipole-dipole array with integer 'n' factor. (b) Example of dipole-
dipole array with non-integer “n” value. Arrangement of the electrodes for (c)
the “forward” and (d) “reverse” pole-dipole arrays.
There are two other issues involved with the pole-dipole array. The first is that
the current electrode can be to the left (normal arrangement) or to the right
(reverse arrangement) of the potential electrodes. To distinguish between the
two arrangements, a positive value is used for the 'n' factor in the normal
arrangement, and a negative value for the 'reverse' arrangement. The pole-
dipole array is an asymmetrical array, and over symmetrical structures the
apparent resistivity anomalies in the pseudosection are also asymmetrical. In
some situations, the asymmetry in the measured apparent resistivity values
could influence the model obtained after inversion. One method to eliminate
the effect of this asymmetry is to repeat the measurements with the electrodes
arranged in the reverse manner. By combining the measurements with the
14
“forward” and “reverse” pole-dipole arrays, any bias in the model due to the
asymmetrical nature of this array would be removed. The file PDIPREV.DAT
is an example data set that combines measurements made with the “forward”
and “reverse” pole-dipole arrays (Table 7.5).
Another variation of the pole-dipole array is the offset pole-dipole array. This
array was originally designed to carry out 3-D I.P. surveys rapidly (White et al
2003), thus data from such surveys are normally processed with the 3-D
inversion program RES3DINV. Support is provided for the array in this
program so that users have the option of inverting each line individually. The
arrangement of the electrodes is shown in the Figure 7.4.
15
The arrangement is similar to that used by the normal pole-dipole array except
that the current electrode is not on the same line as the potential electrodes, but
offset at a distance “b” from the survey line. This arrangement was used to
reduce the EM coupling between the current electrode and the potential dipole.
The file OFF_PDP.DAT gives an example of the data format for this array.
Table 7.6 shows the initial part of this data file with comments about the
format. The data format is essentially the same as the normal pole-dipole array,
except the array number is 10 and the offset distance is given immediately after
the array number.
Note that the topography data is placed immediately after the apparent
resistivity data points. The first item is a flag to indicate whether the file
contains topography data. If there is no topography data, its value is 0. Enter 1
or 2 if topographical data is present. In the case where the actual horizontal and
vertical coordinates of topography data points along the survey line are given,
enter 1. Even if the actual horizontal distances are given in the topography data
section, you must still use the x-distance along the ground surface in the
apparent resistivity data section. In most surveys the distances of the points
along the ground surface, and not true horizontal distances, are actually
measured with a tape or using a cable with takeouts at regular intervals. In this
case, enter a value of 2 for the topography data flag. This is followed by the
number of topographical data points.
It is not necessary to measure the elevation for each electrode. For example, the
data in the GLADOE2.DAT file involves 161 electrodes but only the
elevations at 26 points are given. The maximum number of topographical data
points you can have is 1000. For each data point, the horizontal location and
the elevation is entered into the data file. After the last topographical data
17
point, the number of the topographical data point where the first electrode is
located is given. In the above example, the first electrode was located at -40
meters, which corresponds to the 2nd topographical data point. Note that the
elevation of the first electrode is required. If this was not measured in the field,
you can estimate it from the elevations of the neighboring data points. In most
cases, the first topographical data point corresponds to the first electrode and
the last topographical data point corresponds to the last electrodes. An example
data file with this arrangement is RATHCRO.DAT. By tying the first and last
topographical data points to the first and last electrodes, this will help to avoid
errors in the data format.
file MIXED.DAT is an example data file with such a format. This is actually a
synthetic data set with a mixture of measurements using the Wenner-
Schlumberger and dipole-dipole arrays. The initial part of this data file with
comments about the format is given in Table 7.8.
The sub-array type indicator is used when the electrode configuration follows
one of the conventional arrays, for example the Wenner-Schlumberger array.
As an example, the file MIXEDWS.DAT has the data for a Wenner-
Schlumberger array only but the information is arranged in a general array
format. In this case the sub-array number is 7. The file RATHCMIX.DAT has
the data for the Rathcrogan mound (Waddell and Barton 1995) for the Wenner
array but in a general array format (thus it has sub-array number of 1). For
these data sets, the apparent resistivity vales can be displayed in the form of a
pseudosection. Table 7.9 lists the data format used for this data set. The file
MIXED.DAT is a combined data set with measurements using the Wenner-
Schlumberger and dipole-dipole array. In this case, there is no consistent array
type, so the sub-array number is given as 0.
19
Concerning the indicator for the type of x-location, there are two possible
values. A value of 1 is used if the x-location values are the true horizontal
distances, while a value of 2 is used if it is the distance along the ground
surface. This is similar to the convention used for topography data for the index
based format (Section 7.1.3).
Table 7.10. Example general array data format file with topography in a
separate section.
RATCMIX_Sep_Topo.DAT file Comments
Rathcrogan Name of survey line
2.0 Unit electrode spacing
11 Array type (11 for general array)
1 Sib-array type, 1 for Wenner
Type of measurement (0=app. Header
resistivity,1=resistance)
0 1 to indicate apparent resistivity
399 Number of data points
2 Type of x-location, 2 for surface distance
0 Flag for I.P. data, 0 for none (1 if present)
4 -36.0 0.0 -30.0 0.0 -34.0 0.0 -32.0 0.0 First data point, note non-zero elevation
116.0 after x-location of each electrode.
4 -34.0 0.0 -28.0 0.0 -32.0 0.0 -30.0 0.0 Second data point
118.0
.. Same format for other data points
..
..
4 58.0 0.0 94.0 0.0 70.0 0.0 82.0 0.0 Second last data point
1160.0
4 60.0 0.093 96.0 0.0 72.0 0.0 84.0 0.0 Last data point
1680.0
Topography in separate list Extra header required for general array
2 2 to indicate surface distance
67 Number of topography data points
-36,0.044 Horizontal and vertical coordinates of 1st,
-34,0.134 2nd topography data point
.. This is followed by similar data for
.. the remaining topography data points
96,-3.34 Last topography data point
1 The topography data point number with the
first electrode
0,0,0,0,0 Ends with a few zeros.
If the x-locations are true horizontal distances, the true distance between two
electrodes is used in the calculation of the geometric factor. For example, if the
C1 and P1 electrodes are located at (x1,z1) and (x2,z2) respectively, then
In the case where the ground surface has a constant slope, both conventions
will give the same geometric factor.
Note that in the general array data format, the z-location is the elevation of the
electrode which is positive in the upwards direction. This unfortunately is
different from the format for the borehole data set where the z-values are
positive in the downwards direction.
Figure 7.6 shows an interesting arrangement where the electrodes are arranged
such that the true horizontal distances between adjacent electrodes are
constant. When the slope of the ground surface is not constant, this results in an
arrangement where the distance between adjacent electrodes as measured along
the ground surface is not constant but depends on the slope. In areas where the
slope is steeper, the distance between adjacent electrodes along the ground
surface is greater. To accommodate such an arrangement, the general array
format can be used. In this case, the indicator for the type of x-location must be
1 since the true horizontal distances are given in the data. Very often, the
survey is carried out with one of the conventional arrays, such as the Wenner-
Schlumberger, so the appropriate sub-array number should also be given.
22
Figure 7.6. Arrangement of the electrodes along a survey line such that the true
horizontal distance between adjacent electrodes is constant regardless of the
slope of the ground surface. Note that the distance between adjacent electrodes
along the ground surface is greater at the steeper part of the slope.
In some cases, the 2-D data set is generated from a series of collinear 1-D
sounding lines. In such a situation, the distance between adjacent electrodes is
not constant, whether as measured along the surface or in the true horizontal
direction. For such a case, the general array format (with a sub-array type of 0)
can be used.
For data sets with a sub-array type of 0, the data cannot be displayed in the
form of a pseudosection, nor can it edited with the "Exterminate bad data
points" option. To remove bad data points from the data set, you need to first
carry out an inversion of the entire data set. However, you should use the
"Robust data constrain" (see section 11.2.1) to ensure that bad data points do
not have a large effect on the inversion results. Next, go to the "Display"
window and read in the file with the inversion results. Select the "RMS error
statistics" sub-option under the "Edit data" menu (section 14.4.1). This will
display a histogram where the data points are grouped according to the
difference between the measured and calculated apparent resistivity values.
This allows you to remove the data points where a large difference occurs, for
example more than 100 percent. After removing the more noisy data points,
save the trimmed data set in a file and carry out the inversion again with the
trimmed data set.
To calculate the apparent resistivity value measured with the non-ideal pole-
pole array, two possible geometric factors can be used. One method is to use
the same equation as the ideal pole-pole array. This gives an approximate
geometric factor since the resulting apparent resistivity value is not the same as
the true resistivity for a homogeneous half-space. Alternatively, the exact
geometric factor that takes into account the positions of the C2 and P2
electrodes can be used.
Figure 7.8. A schematic diagram of the arrangement of the electrodes along the
survey line in a pole-pole survey with positions of the C2 and P2 electrodes
specified.
The data format is the same as that for normal pole-pole surveys except for the
section (after the array number) which contains information about the location
of the second current and potential electrodes. The data line “Exact Geometric
factor used” is used to indicate that the apparent resistivity values in the data
file were calculated used the exact geometric factor. If the approximate
geometric factor was used, this data line should be given as “Approximate
Geometric factor used”. The file POLDPLFA.DAT is an example data file for
a pole-dipole survey where the approximate geometric factor was used in
calculating the apparent resistivity values. Note that in this file, only the
location of the second current electrode C2 is given.
The electrodes are divided into 2 sets with (i) the surface electrodes, (ii)
electrodes in the boreholes. It is assumed that the boreholes do not have a metal
casing which would severely alter the pattern of the current flow. The program
divides the subsurface into a number of quadrilateral blocks (Figure 7.9). Note
that the positions of the surface and borehole electrodes control the manner in
which the subsurface is divided into the model blocks. The file
BOREDIFF.DAT is an example data file with cross-borehole measurements. A
description of the format used is given in Table 7.13. Note that in this example,
the measurements are made with the pole-dipole array where only the C1, P1
and P2 electrodes are used.
28
It is assumed the boreholes are vertical. Thus the x-locations of the electrodes
in the same borehole are the same in Table 7.13. The array number is 12 for
cross-borehole survey data with the measurements given as apparent resistivity
values. You can also enter the data as resistance measurements, in which case
the array number is 13. This might be more convenient as most resistivity
meters give the readings as a resistance value in ohm, and furthermore the
geometric factor for arrays with subsurface electrodes is different from the
geometric factor for conventional surface arrays. The file BORERES.DAT
gives an example where the measurements are given as resistance values. An
interesting field data set where the pole-pole array was used, and the
measurements are also given as resistance values, is BORELUND.DAT from
Lund University, Sweden.
If only two electrodes are used in a measurement, only the x- and z-locations of
the C1 and P1 electrodes are given in the data file (see the file BOREHIP.DAT
which also contains IP measurements). However, if all four electrodes are used,
the x- and z-locations of the C1, C2, P1 and P2 electrodes must be given in this
order. You can combine measurements made with different numbers of
electrodes in the same data file.
When the programs reads in a file with resistance values, you have a choice of
inverting the data set using apparent resistivity values, or directly use the
resistance values. Using resistance values directly in the inversion has the
advantage of allowing you to use readings where the apparent resistivity value
does not exist, or is negative. After reading in a data file, the program will
attempt to filter out suspicious readings with potentially high noise levels if the
measurements are given as apparent resistivity values, or if you had chosen the
option to use apparent resistivity values in the inversion. If you choose to carry
out the inversion using resistance values, the readings are not filtered.
The geometric factor for subsurface electrodes is different from that used for
surface electrodes. As an example, the geometric factor for a measurement
where only two electrodes is used is as follows. If the C1 and P1 electrodes are
located at (x1,z1) and (x2,z2) respectively, the geometric factor k is then given by
1 1
k = 4π / + ' (7.5)
r1 r1
where r1 = dx 2 + dz 2 , dx = x1 − x 2 , dz = z1 − z 2
r1' = Dx 2 + dz 2 , Dz = z1 + z 2
30
This program requires that the number of electrodes in both boreholes must be
the same. In practice, this restriction is not a significant problem. You can be
easily overcome this restriction by inserting dummy electrodes into the data set
if the number of electrodes in one borehole is less (in the section where the x-
and z-location of the electrodes in the borehole are given).
The program also requires that a surface electrode is located at the top of both
boreholes. If they do not physically exist, just insert dummy electrodes at the
appropriate locations in the data file. Also there should be at least a few surface
electrodes between the two boreholes, as well as at least two surface electrodes
to the left of borehole 1, and another two to the right of borehole 2. If such
electrodes were not used in the field survey, just insert dummy electrodes into
the data file to satisfy the requirements of this program.
By default, the program will subdivide the subsurface into quadrilateral blocks
such that the dimensions of the blocks are equal to the spacing between the
electrodes (Figure 7.9a). However, you can also choose to use a model where
the dimensions of the blocks is about half the spacing between the electrodes
(Figure 7.9b). Using the model with a finer discretization could significantly
improve the inversion results in some cases (Sasaki 1992). Please refer to
section 11.3.10 to set the type of borehole model to use. In theory, it is possible
to further subdivide the subsurface into even smaller blocks. However, since
the resolution of electrical measurements decreases rapidly with distance from
the measuring electrodes, this is unlikely to significantly improve the results. In
fact, it could result in unnatural oscillations in the model resistivity values,
particularly near the electrodes. This is as a result of the well known trade-off
between model resolution and model variance in geophysical inversion.
Figure 7.10 shows the model obtained after the inversion of the
BOREHOLE.DAT data set. This is a synthetic data set produced by a forward
modeling program with a high resistivity block in between the two boreholes.
The option to use finer blocks with half the size of the spacing between the
electrodes was used in the inversion of this data set.
Figure 7.11 shows the inversion results from an interesting field data set. This
data set is one from a number that were collected by a survey to study the flow
31
If I.P. measurements were also made, you need to enter a value of 1 at the 6th
line in the data file, and two more data lines after that which gives the type of
IP measurement used and the two parameters associated with it (see section
7.5). Next, enter the I.P. value after the apparent resistivity value for each data
point. The file BOREHIP.DAT is an example cross-borehole data file with IP
measurements.
Figure 7.10. The model obtained after the inversion of the BOREHOLE.DAT
data set. The option to use finer blocks with half the size of the spacing
between the electrodes was used.
32
Figure 7.11. Model obtained from the inversion of data from a cross-borehole
survey to map the flow of a saline tracer. Note the low resistivity zones near
the surface (where the tracer was injected) and below a depth of 7 meters. The
locations of the borehole electrodes are shown by small black dots.
The file boreholes_inclined.dat gives an example of the data format with non-
vertical boreholes (Table 7.14). Note the addition of an additional header line
‘Inclined boreholes present’ just before the section with the positions of the
boreholes to indicate that non-vertical boreholes are present. For inclined
boreholes, the subdivision of the subsurface into model blocks is no longer tied
directly to the positions of the electrodes. You can also use this format for
vertical boreholes are where the corresponding electrodes at different boreholes
are at different depths. This avoids inclined or skewed model blocks when
there are significant differences in the borehole electrodes depths.
33
The file IPMODEL.DAT has the I.P. data as chargeability values using the
index based format for the positions of the electrodes. The first part of the files
with comments are listed in Table 7.16.
A value of “1”, instead of “0”, is entered into the sixth line to indicate that I.P.
data is present. This is followed by 3 data lines that gives information about the
nature of the I.P. data. The seventh line with the word 'Chargeability' shows
that the I.P. data is given in terms of chargeability. Many I.P. instruments
measured the chargeability be integrating the area under the I.P. decay curve.
In this case, the unit is in msec (millisecond). The chargeability value obtained
by this method is normally calibrated to the Newmont M(331) standard (Summer
1976) so that the chargeability value in msec has the same numerical value as
the chargeability given in mV/V. The chargeability in mV/V is defined as the
ratio of the secondary voltage immediately after the current is cut off to the
primary DC voltage.
36
I.P. surveys have traditionally been used in the mineral exploration industry,
particularly for metal sulfides, where generators producing high currents of the
order of 10 Amperes are used. The apparent I.P. values from such surveys are
usually less than 100 msec. (or mV/V). One recent development is the addition
of IP capability to battery based systems used in engineering and
environmental surveys where currents of 1 Ampere or less are normally used.
An accompanying phenomenon is the observation of I.P. values of over 1000
msec. (or less than -1000 msec.) in some data sets. Such values are almost
certainly caused by noise due to a very weak I.P. signal. To check whether
such high I.P. values are real, first check the apparent resistivity pseudosection.
If it shows unusually high and low values that vary in an erratic manner, the
data is noisy. If the apparent resistivity values are noisy, then the apparent I.P.
values are almost certainly unreliable. Next check the apparent I.P.
pseudosection. If the apparent I.P. values show an erratic pattern (frequently
with anomalous values lined up diagonally with an apex at a doubtful
electrode), then the I.P. values are too noisy to be interpretable.
I.P. values that are given in other units are converted into chargeability values
internally by the program during the inversion process. The relevant
conversion equations may be found in the papers by Van Voorhis et al. (1973)
and Nelson and Van Voorhis (1973).
For frequency domain measurements, the I.P. value is usually given in Percent
Frequency Effect (PFE). This is given as
where ρDC and ρAC are the apparent resistivity values measured at low and high
frequencies. The file IPSHAN.DAT is an example of a frequency domain I.P.
data set. In the seventh line, the type of I.P. data is given as “Percent Frequency
Effect”. The ninth data line contains the values of the low and high frequencies
used in the measurement. This data set is from a field survey in Burma where
the measurements were made with 20 and 40 meters dipoles (Edwards 1977).
Like many field data sets, it has a very complex distribution of the data points
in the pseudosection. The survey target is a galena deposit in meta-sediments.
The geology is rather complex with massive galena deposits together with
quartz veins, silicified marbles and clay zones. There is a very wide range of
resistivity values.
I.P. values are also given as phase angles. In this case the unit normally used is
milli-radians (mrad). An example of an I.P. data set with phase angles is given
in the file IPKENN.DAT with values from the paper by Hallof (1990). In the
37
seventh line, the type of I.P. data type is given as “Phase Angle”. The second
parameter in the ninth data line contains the values of the frequency at which
the phase angles were measured. The first parameter is not used and is
normally set to 0. Many modern I.P. survey instruments can measure the phase
angle for several frequencies. In this case, the inversion of is repeated for the
phase angle data at each frequency. This will give an idea of the change of the
subsurface I.P. phase angle with frequency for complex resistivity studies.
I.P. data is sometimes given as a metal factor (MF) value. The MF value can be
calculated from either time domain or frequency domain measurements. In the
time domain, the metal factor is value is given by
The file IPMAGUSI.DAT is from a survey over the Magusi River ore body
(Edwards 1977) where the survey was conducted with 30.5 meters (100 feet),
61.0 meters (200 feet) and 91.4 meters (300 feet) dipoles. Again the resulting
pseudosection has a very complex distribution of the data points. The measured
apparent resistivity and I.P. pseudosections, together with the model sections
obtained are shown in Figure 7.12. The ore body shows up as a distinct low
resistivity body with high IP values near the middle of the survey line in the
model sections. In the inversion of this data set, the robust inversion method
was used (see section 11.2.1) to sharpen the boundary between the ore body
and the surrounding rocks. This program uses the complex resistivity method
(Kenma et al. 2000) for the inversion of I.P. data.
The inversion program tries to minimize the difference between the observed
and calculated equivalent apparent chargeability values. IP values in percent
frequency effect and phase angles are directly proportional to the equivalent
chargeability values. However, the metal factor value also involves a resistivity
value. The model that gives a minimum RMS error for the chargeability values
sometimes does not give a minimum RMS error for the metal factor values.
However, the actual effect on the inversion model is usually very small.
The file IPGENERAL8.DAT is an example I.P. data file using the general
array data format. The I.P. data parameters are also given just before the main
data section with the apparent resistivity and I.P. values.
38
Figure 7.12. Magusi River ore body resistivity and I.P sections. (a) Apparent
resistivity pseudosection, (b) resistivity model section, (c) apparent metal
factor pseudosection and (d) metal factor model section.
and pole-dipole arrays in such experiments if larger spacings are used due to
the relatively low signal to noise ratios. It might be safer to use the Wenner
array or preferably the Wenner-Schlumberger array.
The data format is largely similar to the normal data set with only one set of
readings. For a time-lapse data file, the main difference is the extra section just
before the data block with the apparent resistivity values. Here the header
"Time sequence data" is used to indicate the presence of the extra data sets
corresponding to the later time measurements. The following part of this extra
section contains information on the number of time series measurements (3 in
this example). The maximum number of time series data sets allowed is 21 (30
for RES2DINVx64 with 16GB RAM). For each data point, the format for the
initial part is identical to that used for the normal data sets. The only addition is
40
that after the apparent resistivity value for the first data set, the corresponding
apparent resistivity values for the later time data sets are given.
If a measurement was missing from a time series, enter 0.0 as the value of the
apparent resistivity for that particular time series. The program will assume that
a zero value is an indication of a missing data point.
To include the data error estimate in a data file, the error values are entered
after the apparent resistivity value. The file MODEL35_N.DAT is an example
of a data file from a surface survey with the error values. Part of the file is
shown below with an explanation of the changes needed.
Note there are two new additions in the data format. Firstly, just before the
section of the file with the measured apparent resistivity data points, there are 3
extra lines. The first line ‘Error estimate for data present’ is a header to indicate
that the data file contains the data error estimates. The second new line is a
header to explain the use of the next line. The third line contains a flag to
indicate to the program the units used in the error estimate. At present, use a
value of ‘0’ to indicate that the error value has the same units as the data value.
For example, if the measurements are given as ohm.m, then the error values
must also be in ohm.m The measurements in most instruments are given as
resistance values (i.e. ohm), or voltage plus current values which can be
converted to resistance values. To calculate the apparent resistivity value, the
resistance value is multiplied by a geometric factor. The error value recorded
by the instrument is probably in the form of a resistance (ohm) value. Thus the
error estimate recorded by the instrument must also be multiplied by the same
geometric factor before it is entered into the DAT file format used by this
program. The file modelip_5%_noise.dat gives an example of an I.P. data set
with noise estimates.
The use of the flag for the unit used by the error value makes it possible for
future versions of the program to allow the use of other units for the error
value, for example the data in ohm.m while the error in ohm. Another
possibility is the error given as a percentage value.
(J T
)
WdT Wd J + µF d= J T WdT Wd g − µFq k (7.9)
where Wd is a diagonal weighting matrix that incorporates the effect of the
data errors. Data points with a smaller error are given a greater weight in the
inversion process.
The first item after the topography data section is the number of regions where
the resistivity is to be specified. In the example above, 2 regions are specified.
If a value of 0 is given (default value), then there are no regions where the
resistivity is specified by the user. Next, the shape of the region is given, R for
rectangular or T for triangular. If a rectangular region is specified, then the X
and Z coordinates of the top-left and bottom-right corners of the rectangle are
given, as shown in Figure 7.13.
the program should be allowed (within limits) to change the resistivity of the
region. If a damping factor weight of 1.0 is used, the resistivity of the region is
allowed to change to the same extent as other regions of the subsurface model
The larger the damping factor weight is used, the smaller is the change that is
allowed in the resistivity of the "fixed" region. Normally, a value of about 1.5
to 2.5 is used. If a relatively large value is used, for example 10.0, the change
in the resistivity of the region would be very small during the inversion
process. Such a large value should only be used if the resistivity and shape of
the region is accurately known.
Figure 7.13. Fixing the resistivity of rectangular and triangular regions of the
inversion model.
44
The information about aquatic survey parameters are entered in the data file
after the main section with the apparent resistivity data and the topography.
While the left and right limits of the water layer are included in the data format,
this is at present not used by the program. It is included for future use for
surveys with some of the electrodes above the water layer, for example a
survey across a river. Note that a flag is included to indicate that the normal
geometric factor (as used for a surface survey) is used to calculate the apparent
resistivity values. If a value of 0 is used for this flag, the exact geometric factor
(which includes the thickness of the water layer) must be used to calculate the
apparent resistivity values.
In the HAT_HEAD.DAT file, some of the electrodes are above the water
(Figure 7.14). In many surveys all the electrodes are underwater, as in the
following LAKELELIA.DAT example (Table 7.21).
45
Table 7.20. Example data file for aquatic survey with bottom electrodes.
HAT_HEAD.DAT file Comments
LR5 Marine Title
2.5 Unit electrode spacing
1 Array type, Wenner in this example
392 Number of data points
0 First electrode x-location of array is given
0 No I.P. data
0 .0 2.5 20.445599 First data point
7.5 2.5 167.579387 Second data point
..
.. Same format for other data points
..
2.5 40 25.202095 Last data point
2 Topography flag, surface distance used
50 Number of topography points
0.0 2.36 x-location and elevation of 1st topography point
2.5 2.41 x-location and elevation of 2nd topography point
..
.. Same format for other topography points
77.5 0.55
80.0 0.00 A few points below water surface
82.5 0.05
..
122.5 2.51 Last topography point
1 Indicates first electrode is at first topography data point
0 Flag for fixed regions, 0 for no fixed regions in this case
1 Flag to indicate aquatic survey with bottom electrodes
0.18 Resistivity of water layer
0, 122.5 Left and right limits of water layer
1.5 Elevation of water surface
1 1 to indicate normal surface geometric factor used
0,0,0,0 Ends with a few zeros for other options
The program will automatically calculate the thickness of the water layer from
the elevation of the sea or river bottom and the elevation of the water surface.
This format allows for the second situation shown in Figure 7.13 where some
of the electrodes are above the water surface (i.e. on normal dry land) and some
of the electrodes underwater. A common situation where this occurs is a survey
that crosses a river. In this case, the program will assume that an electrode with
an elevation that is less than the elevation of the water surface is underwater.
For the case when some of the electrodes are above the water surface, the
46
surface geometric factor must be used for calculating the apparent resistivity
values for all the data points.
Figure 7.15. Hat Head land and underwater survey. (a) Apparent resistivity
pseudosection (Wenner array) from the Hat Head tidal creek survey and (b) the
inversion model. Note the creek between the 65 and 95 meters marks where the
electrodes are underwater.
However if the depth of the water bottom was measured during the course of
the survey (usually with an echo sounder), and the water resistivity was also
measured, the effect of the water layer could be calculated and included in the
model. The file WATER_FLOAT.DAT is a synthetic data set which gives an
example of the data format. The initial part of the file is identical with that used
for normal surface surveys or surveys with electrodes on the water bottom. The
difference is in the final section of the file where the water layer parameters are
given in Table 7.22. While this example gives the data in the general array
format (section 7.2), the program can also accept data in the index based
format (see section 7.1).
Most systems for surveys with floating electrodes take measurements at a finer
spacing compared to the spacings between the electrodes takeouts on the cable.
Please refer to section 8.2 for methods to handle such data from mobile survey
systems.
As a final note, it has been observed that in some data sets there is mismatch
between the coordinates of the electrodes for the measurements and the bottom
topography as measured using a profiler and a GPS system. This shows up
when using the option to incorporate the water layer in the inversion model by
a horizontal shift (usually of 5 to 10 meters) between the bottom topography
and steep structures in the inversion model such as small gullies and peaks.
This is probably due to differences in the locations of the depth sounder system
and the cable with the electrodes.
49
In this example, there are two boundaries. If there is more boundaries, the
section with ‘Boundary 3 parameters’ until the x-location and depth of the last
point along the second boundary is repeated. The file
MODEL_BOUNDARY_GENERAL.DAT gives an example of a data file with
the general array format with only one boundary.
Figure 7.17 shows the inversion of the CLIFLAYER4.DAT data set using
different inversion options. The first model using the smooth inversion method
(section 11.2) shows a gradational transition between the sand and underlying
lower resistivity clay layer (Figure 7.17b). The depth to the boundary is not
well determined. The use of the blocky or robust inversion method (section
11.2) gives a much sharper boundary (Figure 7.17c). The addition of the
boundary from the seismic refraction survey helps to further sharpen the
boundary (Figure 7.17d).
The greatest limitation of this option at present is that the depths to the layers
are fixed throughout the inversion. An option to allow the depths to be
automatically changed might be added in a future update.
51
Figure 7.17. Models for the Clifton survey from the different inversion
methods are shown together. Note the boundary between the high resistivity
sand layer and the underlying low resistivity clay layer is much better resolved
in the blocky and sharp boundary inversion methods.
53
An example for a data file (without topography) using the index based format
for the resistivity data is given in the file BETA_GLOBAL.DAT. The section
of the file containing the GPS information is shown below.
An example for a data file with topography using the index based format is
given in the file RATCHRO_GLOBAL.DAT. The section of the file
containing the GPS information given after the topography section is shown in
Table 7.25.
54
Table 7.25. Example data file with index based format and topography and
global coordinates.
RATHCRO_GLOBAL.DAT file Comments
.. Initial section with main data section and
.. topography
..
92,-3.207 Last
94,-3.27 Three topography
96,-3.34 data points
1 First topography point same as first electrode
Global Coordinates present Header to indicate GPS information present
Number of coordinate points Header
3 Number of coordinate points
Local Longitude Latitude Header
-36.0 80100.0 200300.0 First coordinate point given as
Local position along line, GPS Longitude, GPS
Latitude
20.0 80148.1 200327.8 Second coordinate point
96.0 80213.3 200365.4 Third coordinate point
0 Zeros to indicate other options,
0 such as fixed regions etc.
0 not present
To make use of the GPS coordinates, you need to first run an inversion of the
data set. Next read the inversion file in the ‘Display’ window, and then save the
model values in an XYZ file using the ‘File - Model export - Save data in XYZ
format’ option (section 14.1.2). The model values with the GPS coordinates
will be listed in the last section of the XYZ file.
55
Table 7.26. Example data file with general array format, topography and global
coordinates.
RATHMIX_GLOBAL.DAT file Comments
.. Initial part with main data section
4 60.0 -0.093 96.0 -3.34 72.0 -2.274 Last apparent resistivity data point
84.0 -2.914 1680.0
0 Put zero for topography flag
Global Coordinates present Header to indicate GPS information present
Number of coordinate points Header
3 Number of coordinate points
Local Longitude Latitude Header
-36.0 80100.0 200300.0 Local position along line, GPS Longitude,
GPS Latitude
20.0 80148.1 200327.8 Second coordinate point
96.0 80213.3 200365.4 Third coordinate point
0 Zeros to indicate other options,
0 such as fixed regions etc.
0 not present
Table 7.27. Example aquatic survey data file with global coordinates.
LAKELELIA_GLOBAL.DAT file Comments
.. Initial part with main data section
4 1056.62,0.0 1083.62,0.0 Last data point
1065.62,0.0 1074.62,0.0 95.383
Topography in separate list Header for topography information
2 Topography flag
38 Number of topography points
26.12 999.09 First topography point
….. Other topography data points
1127.76 999.09 Last topography point
1 1st topography point at 1st electrode
Number of coordinate points Header
4 Number of coordinate points
Local Longitude Latitude Header
26.0 100000.0 200000.0 First coordinate point given as local position
along line, GPS Longitude, GPS Latitude
126.0 100086.6 200086.6 Second coordinate point
500.0 100410.5 200237.0 Third coordinate point
1092.0 100923.2 200533.0 Last coordinate point
0 Zeros to indicate other options,
0 such as fixed regions etc. not present
1 Indicates water layer present
58.00,-2000.00,2000.00,1000,1 The water layer information
0,0,0 End with a few zeros
56
Select the 'Shift the electrodes' option, and then read in the data file. The
program will automatically adjust the positions of the electrodes so that the
distance of each electrode from the first electrode position is an integer
multiple of the unit electrode spacing. In the process of shifting the positions of
the electrodes, some measurements might end up having the same electrode
positions. When this occurs, the program will display the following dialog box.
58
If the 'Remove repeated data points now' option is selected, the program will
combine readings with the same electrode positions into a single data point.
Firstly, it allows the user to automatically switch the positions of the C1 and
C2 electrodes for dipole-dipole array data given in the general array format
(section 7.2). The positions of the electrodes are frequently listed in the C2-C1-
P2-P1 order although this will result in a negative geometric factor. Selecting
the 'Automatically switch electrodes' option will swap the positions of the C1
and C2 electrodes so that the array configurations will have a positive
geometric factor.
The second option deals with data in the general array format where the
measurements are given as resistance values. One common mistake of
measurements in resistance values is that the sign of the measurement is
sometimes not recorded, i.e. it is always listed as positive. This will result in
the sign of the resistance value being inconsistent with the arrangement of the
electrodes for cases with a negative geometric factor. If the option to force the
apparent resistivity to be positive is chosen, the program will change the sign
59
Use this option to read in the raw data file from different instruments, and
convert the data into the format used by RES2DINVx32.
Table 8.1. Example script file to combine 2-D data files into a 3-D data file.
COLLATE_2D_3D.TXT file Comments
Conversion of RES2DINV data files Title
Number of files to collate Header for no. of data files
3 Number of data files
File 1 parameters Header for first file
Name of data file in RES2DINV format Header for name of file
d:\test\FILE2D_1.DAT Full name plus path of file
X and Y location of first electrode along this Header
line
0.0,0.0 Coordinates of the first electrode
Line direction (0=X,1=Y) Header
0 Number specifying line direction
Line sign (0=positive,1=negative) Header
0 Specify whether electrode coordinates
increase or decrease along line
File 2 parameters Same set of parameters for second file
Name of data file in RES2DINV format
d:\test\FILE2D_2.DAT
X and Y location of first electrode along this
line
0.0,-0.5
Line direction (0=X,1=Y)
0
Line sign (0=positive,1=negative)
0
..
.. Similar information for third file
..
Name of output file in RES3DINV format Header
d:\test\FILE_3D.dat Name of 3-D data file
End of file Header for end of file
The format used allows for the possibility that the survey has lines in two
perpendicular directions.
A 2-D survey line has only one horizontal direction, and the coordinate of an
electrode along the survey line is given as the distance along the line, starting
from the first electrode. To determine the coordinate of the electrode in the X-
Y plane for a 3-D survey, we need to determine the coordinate of the first
electrode in the 2-D survey line within the X-Y survey grid. This gives a
reference point for which the coordinates of the other electrodes along the same
survey line can be calculated.
62
In a 2-D survey line, it is always assumed that the coordinate of the electrode
always increases starting from the first electrode (i.e. from left to right in a
typical pseudosection). However, the direction of increasing coordinate value
along the 2-D survey line might not always be the same as the positive x or y
direction in the 3-D survey x-y grid. The ‘Line sign’ parameter allows for the
possibility that the direction of the 2-D survey line is opposite to the direction
of the positive x or y axis in the x-y grid.
While it is possible to combine a number of 2-D lines into a 3-D data set, it
might not always be worthwhile to do so. Firstly, it is recommended that there
should be at least 5 parallel lines. The separation between the lines should not
be more than twice the unit electrode spacing along the lines. For further
details, please refer to Chapter 8 of the free “Tutorial : 2-D and 3-D electrical
imaging surveys” (Loke 2011). It can be downloaded from the
www.geoelectrical.com web site. The RES3DINV program will carry a true 3-
D inversion (in that the resistivity values are allowed to vary in all 3 directions
simultaneously during the inversion process). A discussion on the inversion of
such 3-D data sets is found in Loke and Dahlin (2010).
When the program reads in a data file, it will sort the data according to depth of
investigation of the array. For index based data, it will group the data points
according to the 'a' and 'n' values used. If the first option is selected, the
program will saved the data after sorting into a separate data file. If the original
data file is in a general array format, but s standard array was used, the second
option allows the user to save the data in a file using the index based format.
This makes it easier to detect problems with the data, such as the use of large
'n' values with the Wenner-Schlumberger, pole-dipole and dipole-dipole arrays.
Figure 9.1. Example of a data set with a few bad data points. The data is
displayed using the "Exterminate bad data points" option.
You can also display the list of editing keys used by selecting the 'Help' menu
option that will display the following information box.
The data points selected will be marked by purple crosses or dots, whereas the
remaining data points are black. At the top of the display, the left and right
limits of the section selected are marked by yellow vertical lines. If there are
too many data points in the lower levels, you can reduce the number of data
points by selecting only odd or even points in a level. To do this, move the
horizontal yellow marker on the left side of the display up or down to the level
you want to decimate using the up and down arrow keys. Then press D to
decimate the data points in that level. Using this option, you can select a
67
section of the data set to invert. The entire data set can then be inverted by
inverting successive subsections of the data set. After selecting the data set
subsection you want invert, will need to save it to a new file.
Figure 9.2. Example of a display using the splice data option for a data set in
the indexed base format.
For data is given in the general array format, you can trim the data by changing
the left and right limits of the data set, as in the following dialog box.
In general, it is recommended that you try to invert the entire data set at one go.
In most cases, this can be easily done by adding more RAM and free hard disk
68
space to your computer. If the data is from a long survey line with more than
500 electrode position, you can select the ''Sparse inversion' option to
significantly reduce the calculation time and computer memory required (see
section 11.2.6).
You can set the initial value for the damping factor in equation (4.1), as well as
the minimum damping factor. The inversion program automatically reduces the
damping factor by about half after each iteration until it reaches the selected
minimum value. If the data set is very noisy, you should use a relatively larger
damping factor (for example 0.3). If the data set is less noisy, use a smaller
initial damping factor (for example 0.1). The inversion subroutine will
generally reduce the damping factor in equation (4.1) after each iteration.
However, a minimum limit for the damping factor must be set to stabilize the
inversion process. The minimum value should usually set to about one-tenth to
one-fifth the initial damping factor value. For some data sets, particularly when
the 'Model refinement' option is used to select a model with narrower blocks
(section 11.3.8), the first few layers can show a rippling effect. This can be
reduce by using a higher damping factor for the first layer.
71
This option allows you to limit the range of resistivity values that the inversion
subroutine will give. In the above example, the upper limit for is 20 times the
average model resistivity value for the previous iteration while the lower limit
is 0.05 times (i.e. 1/20 times). The program uses “soft” limits that allow the
actual resistivity model values to exceed the limits to a certain degree.
However, this option will avoid extremely small or large model resistivity
values that are physically unrealistic. The user can also choose to use the
inversion model obtained at the first iteration as the reference model instead of
the average apparent resistivity value.
Figure 10.1. Types of roughness filters. (a) Horizontal and vertical components
only. (b) Diagonal components as well.
74
be more accurate with a finer mesh, but the computer time and memory
required will be greater. The use of a finer mesh can give better results for
cases where subsurface resistivity contrasts of greater than 20:1 is expected.
This is particularly useful in areas where a low resistivity layer lies below a
high resistivity layer.
Figure 10.2. Schematic diagram of mesh and model blocks used by forward
modeling routine. This example has 4 nodes between adjacent electrodes.
gradient array. The first and traditional type survey use very few different C1-
C2 positions (usually only one with C1 and C2 located at the two ends of the
line), but many different P1-P2 positions. This was mainly used in mineral
exploration surveys. The second and modern type, mainly used with multi-
channel multi-electrode resistivity meter systems, uses many different C1-C2
positions (a multiple gradient array). To accommodate both possibilities, two
types of data plotting options are available. As most surveys will likely to be
carried out using the second type of survey with multiple C1-C2 positions, this
is described in more detail. The papers by Dahlin and Zhou (2004, 2005) have
some information about such surveys. On selecting the ‘Type of gradient array’
sub-option, the following dialog box is shown.
The ‘Use exact pseudodepth’ choice is the default option. However, the
program will automatically change to the approximate pseudodepth method if
it finds the exact pseudodepth method is not suitable for the data file, such as
for surveys with the traditional type of gradient arrays where only a few C1-C2
positions are used. Figure 10.3 shows a plot of the data from a survey using the
multiple gradient array by Aarhus University (for the Danish Road and
Highway Association) in the form of profiles. Note that each pseudodepth is
split into two profiles shown in different colors. There are two arrangements
with the same pseudodepth for non-symmetrical configurations of the gradient
array (Figure 10.4). The distance between the C1 and C2 electrodes are the
same, but the offset of the P1-P2 dipole from the C1 electrode in (a) is the
same as the dipole offset from the C2 electrode in (b). However, the two
configurations are sensitive to different parts of the subsurface (Dahlin and
Zhou 2005). To provide a smooth plot for the profile, the data from the ‘right’
and ‘left’ configurations are plotted in different profiles.
80
Figure 10.3. Plot of a multiple gradient array data set in the form of profiles
using exact pseudodepths for the CROMER2.DAT file.
Figure 10.4. Two different configurations of the gradient array with the same
pseudodepth but with the potential electrodes at different sides of the array.
Gradient array configuration with (a) right parity and (b) left parity.
If the program finds that it is not practical to plot the profiles using the exact
pseudodepth, it will automatically switch to the approximate pseudodepth
method. For each C1-C2 spacing, the data is split up into several profiles that
are plotted using different colors (Figure 10.5). Figure 10.6 shows the inversion
model of the CROMER02.DAT data and the apparent resistivity
pseudosections.
81
Figure 10.5. Plot of a CROMER2.DAT multiple gradient array data set in the
form of profiles using the approximate pseudodepth method.
Figure 10.6. The inversion result of the CROMER02.DAT data set with the
apparent resistivity and model sections.
82
the first power) between the measured and calculated apparent resistivity
values is minimized can be used (Claerbout and Muir 1973). There is a cut-off
factor which controls the degree in which this robust data constrain is used. If a
value of 0.05 is used, this means the effect of data points where the differences
in the measured and calculated apparent resistivity values are much greater
than 5 percent will be greatly reduced.
As an example, Figure 11.1 shows the inversion results for a synthetic model
with a faulted block (with a resistivity of 50 ohm.m) in the bottom-left side and
a small rectangular block (1 ohm.m) on the right side within a surrounding
medium with a resistivity of 10 ohm.m. A test data set was generated for the
Wenner array (Figure 11.1a). The model produced by the standard least-
squares method has a gradational boundary for the faulted block (Figure
11.1b). In comparison, the model produced by the robust model inversion
method has sharper and straighter boundaries (Figure 11.1c). A field example
with sharp boundaries was shown earlier in Figure 7.11 for the Magusi River
resistivity and IP data set. The main structure, the massive sulphide ore body,
by nature has a distinct and sharp resistivity/IP contrast with the surrounding
igneous/metamorphic country rocks. In the RES2DINV program, this robust
model option can be selected by clicking the “Robust model constraint” option
in the “Select robust inversion” dialog box. There is a cut-off factor which
controls the degree in which this robust model constrain is used. If a large
value is used, for example 1.0, the result is essentially that of the conventional
smoothness-constrained least-squares inversion method. If a very small value is
used, for example 0.001, the result is close to the true L1-norm inversion
method.
86
Figure 11.1. Example of inversion results using the smooth and robust
inversion model constraint. (a) Apparent resistivity pseudosection. The
inversion models produced by (b) the conventional least-squares smoothness-
constrained method and (c) the robust inversion method.
The first option in the dialog box allows the user to apply the smoothness
constraint on the model change vector alone, or also on the model resistivity
values. Applying the smoothness constraint on the model change vector alone
modifies equation (4.1) to the following form which is used by some
researchers (Sasaki 1992)
(J T
J + λ F ) ∆q k = J T g k , (11.1)
where ∆q k is the model change vector. This second option, combining the
damped least squares method with the smoothness-constrained method, is
intended for use in unusual situations where the data sensitivity values of the
model blocks are significantly distorted by large resistivity variations. It
modifies the least-squares equation to the following form.
(J T
J +λ (F + I ))∆q k = J T g − λFq k , (11.2)
In some situations, such as a survey over a very low resistivity body, the
current paths could be distorted such that parts of the subsurface are not well
mapped and have very low data sensitivity values in the inversion model. This
could lead to large distortions just below the low resistivity body. By
combining the Marquardt (or ridge regression) and Occam (or smoothness-
constrained) inversion methods, the distortions in some cases might be
reduced. This option should be used as a last resort if everything else fails! It
seems to give better results in resolving compact structures where the width
and thickness are slightly smaller than the depth, such as a cave or ore-body
whose size is just slightly less than its depth.
(J T
)
J +λ (F + µI ) ∆q k = J T g − λFq k − λµ (q k − q m ) (11.3)
An additional damping factor µ that controls the degree where the inversion
model is 'close' to a reference model qm is used. The reference model is
usually a homogeneous half-space model. The following dialog box shows the
settings that can be selected by the user.
The user can set the damping factor as well as the resistivity for the reference
model. Be default, the program will use the average of the apparent resistivity
values as the constant resistivity reference model. However, this reference
resistivity value can be changed by the user.
90
The first option is to use an optimized method to calculate the Jacobian matrix.
This can significantly reduce the calculation time without affecting the
accuracy of the values, and should give the same inversion model as the default
method. The second method is to use a fast method to calculate the Jacobian
matrix. The Jacobian matrix values and thus inversion model will be slightly
different from that obtained using the standard method, but the difference is
normally small (less than 5%) and does not affect the model interpretation. The
third method, using sparse inversion techniques, is intended for long survey
lines of 500 electrodes positions or more. This method will still produce a
contiguous model along the entire survey line, but takes advantage of the
sparse nature of the Jacobian matrix to reduce the number of calculations
needed. The results will be marginally different (usually less than 5%) from
that obtained using the standard method and will not affect the interpretation of
the results.
91
[J T
i ( )] ( )
J i + λ F + αM T R t M ∆q k = J Ti g i − λ F + αM T R t M q k (11.4)
There are two methods that can be used for the inversion of the data set. The
first method (Use fixed water layer) is more suitable when the maximum
thickness of the water layer is small (less than 20%) compared to the maximum
depth of investigation of the survey configuration. Figure 11.2 below shows the
inversion of the WATER_FLOAT.DAT data set using this method. A distorted
finite-element grid is used to model the water layer. The maximum thickness of
the water layer in this example is 2.5 meters that is small compared to the
maximum depth of investigation at about 15 meters for the data set.
Figure 11.2. Example of inversion model with a fixed water layer. The
inversion results of the WATER_FLOAT.DAT data is shown where the
resistivity water layer (represented by the top blue layer in the model section)
is fixed and model extends from below the water bottom.
The subsurface material below the water layer frequently has a much higher
resistivity than the water. The option ‘Select a sharp change across the water
bottom boundary’ can be used so that a sharp contrast is allowed between the
water layer and the subsurface. This option uses the method described in
section 7.10. The program automatically adjusts the thickness of the model
layers and divides the model cells into those belonging to the water layer and
94
the subsurface. Figure 11.3 shows the arrangement of the model cells for one
of the survey lines along the São Francisco River, divisor of Bahia (BA) and
Pernambuco (PE) states, neighborhoods of the Santa Maria da Boa Vista city
(PE), northeast of the Brazil (Rodrigo Machado pers. Comm.). In this survey, a
dipole-dipole type of configuration was used with 5 meters dipoles. However,
the readings were taken every meter that gives a data set with a nominal unit
electrode spacing of 1 meter. To reduce the number of model cells, and taking
in consideration that the resolution of such a survey is very unlikely to be better
than half the dipole length, the width of the model cells were set at 3 times the
unit electrode spacing (section 11.3.7), i.e. basically 3 meters for almost the
entire section. Also note that the depth of the water at some places is greater
than maximum median depth of investigation (as indicated by the data points
markers). However, the program sets the depth of the layers such that there is
at least one model layer below the water bottom (represented by the dark blue
line). The cells below the water layer are marked as light blue in the figure
below. A sharp resistivity variation is allowed in the inversion method used
between the two sections.
Figure 11.3. Arrangement of model blocks and the water bottom boundary for
an arrangement with the water layer incorporated into the inversion model.
The apparent resistivity pseudosection and inversion model for this data set is
shown in Figure 11.4. In this inversion, the resistivity variation within the
water layer was minimized. Thus the water layer resistivity is generally
uniform except towards the left end of the survey line where there is not much
data. There is also an indication that between the 190 and 220 meters marks,
the near-surface riverbed material consists of low resistivity sediments.
95
Surveys with floating electrodes are frequently carried out using a cable with a
number of electrodes pulled behind a boat, usually with a multi-channel
resistivity-meter system controlled by a computer link to a GPS system. A 5
meters spacing between the electrodes takeouts is commonly used together a
dipole-dipole type of array configuration (not necessary symmetrical). The boat
is moving continuously and the measurements can be made at arbitrary
intervals although the dipole length is 5 meters. Frequently, the measurements
are digitized to every 1 meter position. Thus, the active electrode positions are
1 meter apart that is much smaller than the dipole length of 5 meters. This can
results in very long survey lines, and very large inversion models with the
default settings of the inversion program. A number of options have been
added to the program to reduce the inversion time for such data sets.
Figure 11.4. Inversion model for the survey with floating electrodes along the
along the São Francisco River in Brazil. The thin black line indicates the water
bottom boundary.
The resolution of the survey setup is unlikely to be very much better than the
dipole length particularly if there is water layer of significant thickness
between the cable and the subsurface. The program normally uses a model
where the widths of the model blocks are set to be the same (or half) as the
distance between the electrode positions along the line. This is reasonable for
normal land surveys with a static cable setup. For floating electrodes survey,
since the distance between the electrode positions (1 meter) is much smaller
than the dipole length (5 meters), this results in a model that is too fine. To
avoid this, use the option under the ‘Inversion – Model Discretization –
Change width of blocks ‘ menu described in section 11.3.7. Since the
horizontal resolution of the data is unlikely to be better than half the dipole
length, it is recommended that the width of the model cells be set at 3 times the
unit electrode spacing (for the situation with 5 meters dipoles and 1 meter data
spacing). This will greatly reduce the number of model cells in the inversion
96
model. The time taken to calculate the apparent resistivity (and the
corresponding Jacobian matrix) can be greatly reduced by using the ‘sparse
inversion’ method described in section 11.2.6.
When the program reads in a data file, it will normally set the first layer
thickness using the minimum pseudodepth of the data points. For surface
surveys, since the resolution decreases with depth, the thickness of the layers is
normally increased by between 5 to 15 % with each deeper layer. The program
normally uses a model where the depth to the deepest layer does not exceed the
maximum pseudodepth in the data set. To use a model that spans a deeper
depth range, you can change the factor to increase model depth range, for
example from 1.0 to 1.30 to increase the model depth range by 30%.
Figure 11.5. Different possible arrangement of model blocks for the same data
set. (a) Using wider blocks at sides and bottom, (b) blocks of equal width, (c)
model blocks extended to ends of survey line.
98
The second option is intended for data sets created from a series of overlapping
1-D sounding lines. Such data sets can have great variations is the distances
between the electrode positions. This option allows the user to use a model
with model cells of more uniform width.
100
This allows you to choose model cells with widths of half the unit electrode
spacing. In almost all cases, this gives the optimum results. After selecting this
option, you must read in the data file. The program will then automatically
reduce the unit electrode spacing it uses by half of that given in the data file.
The second method is to modify the data file directly using a text editor. The
unit electrode spacing is given in the second line of the apparent resistivity data
file. For example, the first few lines of the PIPESCHL.DAT file are reproduced
in Table 11.1.
In the second data line, the unit electrode spacing is given as 1.0 meter that is
the actual spacing used in this survey. When the RES2DINV reads in this data
file, it will set the width of the model cells to 1.0 meter. The file
PIPESCHL_HALF.DAT has the same data except that the unit electrode
spacing is now defined as 0.5 meter. The upper part of this file is shown in
Table 11.2.
Table 11.2. Data file with half the standard unit electrode spacing.
PIPESCHL_HALF.DAT file Comments
Underground pipe survey Title
0.50 Half the actual unit electrode spacing
7 Wenner-Schlumberger array
173 Number of data points
1 Mid-point given for x-location
0 No I.P.
1.50 1.00 1 641.1633 First data point
0.0 Coordinates of the first electrode
.. The rest follows the usual data format
When the RES2DINV program reads this file, it will set the model blocks to a
0.5 meter width. Figure 34 shows the inversion models for this data set using
cells with widths of 1.0 and 0.5 meter. The model with the 0.5 meter block
103
width is able to more accurately model the high resistivity anomalies near the
surface between the 3 and 12 meter marks above the pipe, and thus has a
slightly lower apparent resistivity RMS data misfit.
In most cases with large resistivity variations near the surface, using a model
with a cell width of half the actual unit electrode spacing is sufficient. In some
cases, using a narrower cell width of one-third or one-quarter the unit might be
justified, particularly if the survey was carried out using a pole-dipole or
dipole-dipole array with very high ‘n’ factors. If the cell width is one-quarter
the true unit electrode spacing, or less, oscillations in the model resistivity
values in the first few layers can occur. Thus the use of a cell width of less than
one-quarter the true unit electrode spacing is not advisable. It is recommended
that you refer to section 4.9 of the free notes “Tutorial : 2-D and 3-D electrical
imaging surveys” that can be downloaded from the www.geoelectrical.com
web site. This section has a discussion on the effect of using high ‘n’ factors
with the pole-dipole array on the sensitivity of the array to near-surface
anomalies.
Figure 11.6. Example of inversion models using the standard and half-sized
model blocks. (a) The apparent resistivity pseudosection for the
PIPESCHL.DAT data set. The inversion models using (b) blocks with a width
of 1.0 meter that is the same as the actual unit electrode, and (c) using narrower
blocks with a width of 0.5 meter.
104
Figure 11.7. Two arrangements of model blocks using the extended model and
sensitivity values methods. The arrangement of the model blocks used by the
program for the inversion of the MIXEDWS.DAT data set using (a) the default
extended model and (b) a model generated so that any single block the does not
have a relative sensitivity value that is too small.
for the "Generate model blocks" option (Figure 11.7b). Note that the model
created using the sensitivity values increases the width of the blocks near the
sides in the deeper parts of the model section in order to increase the sensitivity
values of the blocks. By default, the program uses a heuristic algorithm partly
based on the position of the data points to generate the size and position of the
model blocks. The "Generate model blocks" uses a more quantitative approach
based the sensitivity values of the model blocks. However, in practice, the
simpler and faster heuristic algorithm gives reasonably good results for most
data sets.
This program uses the complex resistivity method (Kenma et al. 2000) where
the inversion of the apparent and I.P. data are inverted jointly. In most data
sets, the data misfit for (the logarithm of the) apparent resistivity values have a
108
much larger range than the apparent I.P. values. This causes the program to
give a greater weight to reducing the data misfit for the apparent resistivity
compared to the apparent I.P. The first parameter (weight for I.P. data) enables
the user to compensate for this effect by giving a greater weight to the I.P. data
misfit. The second parameter (I.P. damping factor) controls the amplitude of
the change in the model I.P. values allowed after each iteration. A smaller I.P.
damping factor can be used can be used to allow a greater change in the I.P.
model values (which is normally much smaller than the change in the model
resistivity values in the joint inversion method). If a value of 1.0 is used, then
the same damping factors will be used for both the resistivity and IP inversion
routines. Normally a much smaller value of about 0.10 to 0.25 is used.
The ‘Square-root’ or ‘Range bound’ is normally used to ensure the model I.P.
values produced by the inversion program do not exceed the allowed limits.
110
It is recommended that the I.P. refinement step to be used for most data sets.
111
Table 11.3. Example script file for the batch mode inversion.
RESIS_IVP.BTH file Comments
3 Number of files to invert
INVERSION PARAMETERS FILES USED Header
DATA FILE 1 Header for first file
C:\RES2DINV\RATHCRO.DAT Name of first data file to invert
C:\RES2DINV\RATHCRO_L2.INV Output file name with inversion results
C:\RES2DINV\RES2DINV_L2.IVP File containing the inversion settings
DATA FILE 2 Header for second file
C:\RES2DINV\RATHCRO.DAT Name of second data file to invert
C:\RES2DINV\RATHCRO_L1.INV Output file with inversion results
C:\RES2DINV\RES2DINV_L1.IVP File with different inversion settings
DATA FILE 3 Header for third file
C:\RES2DINV\LANDFILL.DAT Third data file to invert
C:\RES2DINV\LANDFILL_L2.INV Output file with inversion results
C:\RES2DINV\RES2DINV_L2.IVP File containing the inversion settings
Since the IVP files are created by the RES2DINV program, it is not necessary
for the user to deal with the details about the file format. To create them, you
112
just need to click the appropriate inversion options within the RES2DINV
program, and then select the “Save inversion parameters’ option under the
“Change Settings” menu to save the parameters into an IVP file.
A command line batch mode option is also available for users who might wish
to invert a large number of data sets at one go by remote control. It allows you
to launch the batch mode from another Windows program, or from a command
line. In Windows, you can access the command line option by clicking the
“Start” button, followed by the “Run” option. If the RES2DINV program is
located in the C:\RES2DINV folder, and the batch script file RESIS_IVP.BTH
is located in the D:\DATA folder, the following command is typed into the
‘Run” dialog box.
C:\RES2DINV\RES2DINV D:\DATA\RESIS_IVP.BTH
This command will launch the RES2DINV program that will automatically
process the list of data files in the RESIS_IVP.BTH. After the program has
processed all the data files, it will automatically shut down. You can process up
to 40 data files using a single batch script file.
Figure 11.8. Topography linear trend removal for the Rathcrogan mound data
set.
Distorted finite-element grid with uniform distortion : This method, and the
next two methods, use a distorted finite-element grid such that the surface
nodes of the mesh match the actual topography. This gives more accurate
results than the older method of using the correction factors for a homogeneous
earth model calculated with the finite-element method (Fox et al. 1980) which
can cause distortions in cases where large resistivity variations occur near the
surface (Tong and Yang 1990, Loke 2000). In this particular option, the nodes
below the surface (and thus also the model layers) are shifted to the same
extent as the surface nodes.
transformation method might not work. If this happens, add a few extra
topography data points near the peak.
Figure 11.10. Example of inversion model for the Rathcrogan Mound data set
with topography. (a) Measured apparent resistivity pseudosection. (b) Inversion
model section with topography.
117
12 Print menu
Clicking this menu will display the following option.
Save screen as BMP file: This option located under the ‘Print’ menu makes a
screen dump of the sections drawn on the screen.
13 Help menu
Clicking the Help menu option will display the following list of sub-options.
Program info - This will display the copyright notice and website address for
downloading program updates.
System info - This will display the computer resources and ID number of the
program USB dongle.
Help - This will launch the help file for the program.
Technical support - This will display the email address for technical support
as well as the customer information required.
118
Save data in XYZ format - This saves the data and model values into a text
based XYZ type of format used by many contouring programs, such as by
Geosoft. These are separate programs sold by GEOSOFT Inc. and other
companies that enables you to use more sophisticated contouring techniques
than those used by the RES2DINV program.
119
Save data in Surfer format - This option allows the user to save the apparent
resistivity pseudosections and model sections in the format used by the
SURFER graphics 2-D plotting program by Golden Software. After reading in
an INV file containing the in inversion results in the 'Display' window, it is
recommended that you display the pseudosections at least once before using
the option to save the results in SURFER format. If the inversion file contains
topographical data, such as the example RATCHRO.INV file provided with
this software package, you will need to use select option 'Include topography in
model display' to display the model section with the topography. After that,
you can click 'Save data in SURFER format' option under the File menu. As an
example the following dialog box is displayed for the RATCHRO.INV file.
In this dialog box, you can select the iteration number for which you want to
save the inversion results. Also, you can choose to save the resistivity values
directly, or the logarithm of the resistivity values which might be more suitable
if the resistivity values have a large range. SURFER will plot the sections as a
rectangular section. In many cases, especially a model section with topography,
this might not be appropriate. To remove the sections outside of the model
section, SURFER provides two methods of blanking part of the displayed
contoured section. The default and normally better method is to use the Base
Map Overlay feature in SURFER. In the bottom half of the dialog box, all the
various possible data or model sections are displayed. For a particular inversion
file, not all the possible sections are available. For example, the
120
RATHCRO.INV file does not have I.P. data, so the buttons to the right of the
dialog box are not checked. As an exercise, click the 'Model resistivity with
topography' option for the RATHCRO.INV file. After clicking the OK button,
the program will then save the various sections. For a particular section, the
program will save 5 different files that are used for different functions in
SURFER. As an example, follow the following steps to plot the resistivity
(logarithm) model section with topography for the RATHCRO.INV file. The
different files are provided in the RES2DINV software package.
1). Create contour file. Click 'Grid' on the top menu bar, and then 'Data' to read
in the RATCHRO_TOPRESLOG.DAT file. After reading in the data file,
SURFER will show the 'Scattered Data Interpolation' dialog box. In the 'Grid
Line Geometry' section, the number of lines that SURFER uses to interpolate
the data values into a rectangular grid is shown. For this data set, the default
values are probably 50 lines in the X direction and 6 lines in the Y direction. In
most cases, you should increase the default values by a factor of 4 to 10 times
to improve the accuracy of the interpolation. For this example, try changing the
number of lines in the X and Y directions to 250 and 30 respectively (i.e.
increase the default values by a factor of 5). The SURFER program will create
a corresponding RATCHRO_TOPRESLOG.GRD file. Next click 'Map' on the
top menu bar and then 'Contour'. In the 'Contour' option, read in the
RATCHRO_TOPRESLOG.GRD file. Next the 'Contour Map' dialog box will
be shown. In this dialog box, click the 'Fill Contours' option. Next click the
'Load' button, and then read in the RATCHRO_TOPRESLOG.LVL file to set
the contour values and colors. If you wish to display the color scale and smooth
the contours, click the 'Color Scale' and 'Smooth Contours' options. Next click
OK.
2). Next you need to mask out sections of the contour display. In the 'Map'
menu, click 'Load Base Map'. Choose the RATCHRO_TOPRESLOG.BLN as
the base map file. In the 'GS Blanking Import Options', just click OK. Do not
use the 'Areas to Curves' option. Next press F2, and then click the 'Overlap
Maps' option in the 'Map' menu. This will combine the contour map and the
base blanking map into a single map. Select the overlay by clicking near one of
the corners of the rectangle containing the contour map, and then select the
'Edit Overlays' command from the 'Map' menu. In the 'Edit Components' dialog
box, click the 'Base' and then click 'Move to Front' button. Next hold down the
CTRL key on the keyboard and click the overlay until the base map is
selected (as shown by the status indicator 'Map:Base' near the bottom left
corner of the screen). Next click the 'Draw' menu, and then choose the 'Fill
Attributes' option. Select the blank or white color as the color for the fill
attributes. Next click the 'Line Attributes', and also select the white color so
that the overlay lines are not visible in the display.
121
3). Click the 'Post' command in the 'Map' menu, and then read in the
RATCHRO_TOPRESLOG_POST.DAT file (which contains the location of
the electrodes) in the 'Open Data' dialog box. After reading in this file, the 'Post
Map' dialog box will be shown. In this dialog box, select the symbol shape and
size and other options you want to use, and then click OK. After that, press F2,
and then click the 'Overlay Maps' command in the 'Map' menu. Next click the
figure and then the 'Edit Overlays' command in the 'Map' menu. Click 'Post'
and the 'Move to Front' , and the electrodes will be drawn on top of the model
section.
After drawing the section in the SURFER window, you can use other options
within SURFER to improve the model section, such as changing the font,
labels, titles etc., before printing the results or exporting it to another format.
SURFER supports a large variety of formats, including bit-mapped graphics
formats such as PCX, BMP, GIF etc.; and well as vector-based formats such as
the AUTOCAD DXF format.
For model sections without topography, step (3) where the post data map is
read is probably not necessary. However, you might need to adjust the tick
marks on the vertical scale on the left side of the contour plot. The depths are
given as negative values so that SURFER will plot the figure in the correct
orientation with the ground surface on top.
There will be slight differences in the contour sections drawn by SURFER and
RES2DINV due to the differences in the interpolation methods used. SURFER
does not use the original data points, but an interpolated rectangular grid of
points to draw the contours. The differences will probably be more obvious in
areas with very rapid changes in the resistivity. One way to reduce the
differences is to increase the number of grid lines used by SURFER for the
interpolation grid.
Model output in Lund format - This is a data format used by the LUND
Imaging System produced by ABEM. You can save the model resistivity
values in the .RHO and .RMS files used by the MODSEC program.
122
Display data and model sections - Select this option to plot the model and
apparent resistivity pseudosections on the screen. After selecting this option,
you will be prompted for the iteration number to use, and the type of contour
intervals. The following dialog box will be shown for resistivity data where all
the values are positive.
123
The 'Linear contour intervals' option will automatically set the contour
intervals that are linearly spaced out. This is usually not the best option for
resistivity data if it has a large range, but is more suitable for I.P. data that have
a more limited range. The 'Logarithmic contour intervals' will space out the
contours on a logarithmic scale and should normally be used for resistivity
sections. The 'User defined linear contour intervals' option will bring up the
following dialog box.
You should select the initial contour value and spacing such that it covers the
range of resistivity values. Choosing the 'User defined logarithmic contour
intervals' option will bring up the following dialog box.
124
There are two sets of the automatic factors to increase the contour values
starting from the minimum value. The first set doubles the contour values after
every 1 to 4 contours. The second set increases the contour value by a factor of
ten after every 4 to 8 contours. A user defined factor to increase the contour
value is also available. Selecting the 'User defined contour intervals' option will
bring up the following dialog box.
125
For both display options, you will be asked to enter the iteration number and
the contour intervals. After the section is displayed, you can display the results
for the next iteration by pressing the PgDn key. Similarly, pressing the PgUp
key will display the results for the previous iteration.
Choose resistivity or I.P. display - If the data set has I.P. data as well, this
option allows you to choose to display the resistivity or I.P. sections. You can
also display both the resistivity and IP model sections at the same time.
Save contour values - This option saves the values used to draw the contours
in the pseudo and model sections into a file.
126
Display blocks sensitivity - This displays a section with the sensitivity value
associated with each model block. This actually gives the integrated sensitivity
value associated with each model block as given by the following equation.
1 m
Si = ∑ J ij
m j =1
(14.1)
It sums up the Jacobian matrix values associated with the model block for all
the data points. It is a very crude measure of the information the data set has on
the resistivity value of a model block. A better measure is the model resolution
value.
Figure 14.1. Model resolution sections for the LANDFIL.DAT data set. (a)
Apparent resistivity pseudosection. (b) Inversion model section. (c) Model
resolution section. (b) The model resolution normalized by the cross-section
area of the model block.
128
Display percentage change in resistivity - This option will display the change
in the model resistivity obtained from the inversion of a later time data set
compared with the reference model from the inversion of the first data set.
After displaying the sections with the percentage change in the model
resistivity values, you can change the time-lapse data set selected by using the
'Home' and 'End' keys. By default the results for the last time-lapse data set will
be shown. You can show the results of an earlier data set by pressing the
'Home' key.
Figure 14.2. Apparent resistivity and inversion model sections from the
Birmingham time-lapse experiment. (a) The apparent resistivity and (b)
inversion model sections from the survey conducted at the beginning of the
130
Birmingham infiltration study. This shows the results from the initial data set
which forms the base model in the joint inversion with the later time data sets.
The data and model after 10 hours of irrigation are shown in (c) and (d).
Figure 14.3. Sections showing the change in the subsurface resistivity values
with time obtained from the inversion of the data sets collected during the
infiltration and recovery phases of the study.
Display resistivity ratio - This option will display the ratio of resistivities of
the later time model compared with the reference model.
Change factor in Archie's Law - This option allows the user to change the
exponent m in equation (14.1) used to calculate the desaturation value.
Display time sections with topography - This option display the sections with
the percentage change or resistivity ratio with topography included.
Default color scheme - This will reset the color scheme used for coloring the
sections to a default system used by the program.
Reverse color scheme - The default color scheme uses blue for low resistivity
values, and red for high values. This enables the user to reverse the colors used.
Customize color scheme - This option can be used to manually change the
colors used. After changing the values, the color scheme can be saved into a
file so that it can be reused.
Read customize color scheme - You can change the color scheme to a set of
customized colors that was earlier saved in a file.
Vertical display scaling factor - This option allows you to specify the ratio of
the vertical scale to the horizontal scale, i.e. the vertical exaggeration factor, in
the display. Convenient values to use are 2.0, 1.5 and 1.0. If you enter a value
of 0.0, the program will use a default scaling factor so that the display can fit
into the display screen.
Horizontal plotting scale - This allows you to change the horizontal scale, in
terms of number of pixels per unit electrode spacing. This option is useful
when you want to plot the results from different survey lines with different
numbers of electrodes, with the same scale.
Use linear depth scale - The program normally displays the depths to the
centers of the model layers when it displays the model section. The thickness
of the layers usually increase with depth, so the corresponding depth markers
134
are not equally spaced. This option can be used to display the depth markers
with a constant spacing.
Show locations of data points - By default, the location of the data points (and
centers of the model blocks) will be shown by white dots in the color
pseudosection display. You can choose not to display the dots with this option.
Type of model display - In this option, you can display the resistivity values in
the model section in the form of contours (the default choice), or in the form of
rectangular blocks which constitute the inversion model. The contoured section
makes it easier to visualize geological structures, while finer features might be
more easily detected in the rectangular blocks section.
Leave contour lines in display - This option will draw the contour lines as
black lines.
Type of pole-dipole display - This option is only relevant for pole-dipole data
sets with measurements with the “forward” and “reverse” pole-dipole arrays
(see Appendix A). Here you can choose to display the apparent resistivity
values measured with the array in the “forward” or “reverse” configuration.
Blank out part of model using sensitivity values - This option will allow you
to blank out parts of model that have low sensitivity values using the following
dialog box.
Blank out part of model using resolution values - This is similar to the
previous option expect the model resolution per unit area values is used to
select areas of the model to blank out. This option can only be used if the
option to calculate the model resolution values was enabled before running the
inversion of the data file (see section 11.4.6).
136
Underwater display options - This covers the display of model sections for a
survey with the electrodes on the river, lake or sea bed (section 7.9.1). The
first option in the following dialog box extends the model section drawn to the
surface boundary of the water bottom. What a contoured display is used,
normally the centers of the model blocks are used which in the case of the
topmost layer is slightly below the water bottom boundary. Thus in the normal
display there is a slight gap between the top of the model section and water
bottom. Figure 14.4 shows an example of a plot with both options enabled.
Note this gap does not appear if the model section is drawn with rectangular
blocks. In the second option, the color of the water layer can be changed to
match the resistivity values in the contour scale used for the model display.
Choose font - This option is used to select the font used to display text in the
model sections.
Use Omega symbol - This option allows the user to select the word 'ohm' or
the Greek symbol Ω to label the resistance or resistivity values in the model
sections display.
Display distances in feet - This allows the user to display distances in feet in
stead of the default meters.
138
In this option, the user selects a data misfit cutoff value. When the user exits
from this option, the data will be saved in a new data file with data points
having a higher data misfit than the cutoff value removed from the data set.
Save screen as BMP file: This option located under the ‘Print’ menu makes a
screen dump of the sections drawn on the screen.
15 Other resources
You can download the free guide "Tutorial : 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging
surveys" from the www.geoelectrical.com website. It contains a description of
the basic principles of the electrical imaging survey method, some of the
mathematical background and many field examples. The website also has link
to other resources such as research papers and other literature. If you had
purchased the software with a CD, the CD will contain a copy of the guide as
well as a number of research papers.
140
Acknowledgements
Dr. Torleif Dahlin of Lund University in Sweden provided the interesting and
challenging Odarslov Dyke, Gladkvarn and Knivsas data sets. The Grundfor
and Cromer data sets were kindly provided by Dr. Niels B. Christensen of the
University of Aarhus in Denmark and Dr. Torleif Dahlin. The Rathcroghan
data set was kindly provided by Dr. Kevin Barton and Dr. Colin Brown from
data collected by the Applied Geophysics Unit of University College Galway,
Ireland. Dr. Andrew Binley of Lancaster University kindly provided the cross-
borehole field data set. Mr. Ernst Neiderleithinger of Buro Fur Geophysik
Lorenz (Germany) supplied the Landfill data set that provided the initial
motivation to write this program to handle large 2-D data sets. I am also
grateful to Prof. Douglas Oldenburg of the University of British Columbia in
Canada for pointing out the some of the possible advantages of using equation
(2). The Bauchi data was provided by Dr. Ian Acworth of School of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, The Un. of New South Wales, Australia. Many
thanks to Richard Cromwell and Rory Retzlaff of Golder Assoc. (Seattle) for
the survey example to map holes in a clay layer. Bill Seaton of ATS, Virginia
kindly provided the BLUERIDGE.DAT data set. I would also like to thank
Ron Kaufman of Technos Inc. for his permission to use the Lake Lelia
underwater field survey example. I would like to acknowledge Michel Ritz of
IRD, France for kindly providing the BOREHOLE_TOPO.DAT example data
set. The data set for the floating electrodes survey along the São Francisco
River in Brazil was kindly provided by Rodrigo Machado. Finally, a special
thanks to Rob Barker of The University of Birmingham (U.K.) for the
Birmingham time-lapse, Stud Farm bedrock survey and the Clifton (with
Julian Scott) data sets, and his advice through the years.
141
References
Acworth, R. I., 1987. The development of crystalline basement aquifers in a
tropical environment: Quarterly Journal Engineering
Geology, 20, 265-272.
Barker, R. and Moore, J., 1998. The application of time-lapse electrical
tomography in groundwater studies. The Leading Edge, 17, 1454-
1458.
Brandes, I. and Acworth, R.I., 2003. Intrinsic negative chargeability of soft
clays. ASEG Extended Abstracts, 2003, 1-4.
Christensen N.B. and Sorensen K.I., 1994. Integrated use of electromagnetic
methods for hydrogeological investigations. Proceedings of the
Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and
Environmental Problems, March 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, 163-
176.
Claerbout, J.F. and Muir, F., 1973. Robust modeling with erratic data.
Geophysics, 38, 826-844.
Dahlin, T., 1996. 2D resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering
applications. First Break, 14, 275-284.
Dahlin, T. and Zhou, B., 2004. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity
imaging using ten electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 379-
398.
Dahlin, T. and Zhou, B., 2005. Multiple gradient array measurements for
multi-channel 2D resistivity imaging. Near Surface Geophysics, in
review.
Day-Lewis, F.D., Singha, K. and Binley, A.M., 2004. Applying petrophysical
models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms:
Resolution-dependent limitations. Journal of Geophysical Research
110, B08206, doi:10.1029/2004JB003569.
deGroot-Hedlin, C. and Constable, S., 1990, Occam's inversion to generate
smooth, two-dimensional models form magnetotelluric data.
Geophysics, 55, 1613-1624.
Edwards, L.S., 1977, A modified pseudosection for resistivity and induced-
polarization. Geophysics, 42, 1020-1036.
Farquharson, C.G., 2008. Constructing piecewise-constant models in
multidimensional minimum-structure inversions. Geophysics, 73, K1-
K9.
Fox, R.C., Hohmann, G.W., Killpack,T.J. and Rijo, L., 1980, Topographic
effects in resistivity and induced polarization surveys. Geophysics, 45,
75-93.
Hallof, P.G., 1990, Reconnaissance and detailed geophysical results, Granite
Mountain Area Pershing County, Nevada. in Fink, J.B., McAlister,
E.O., Sternberg, B.K., Wieduwilt, W.G. and Ward, S.H. (Eds), 1990,
142
Nelson, G.D. and Van Voorhis, 1973, Letter to the editor regarding the paper
“Complex resistivity spectra of porphyry copper mineralization”.
Geophysics, 38, 984.
Niederleithinger, E., 1994, Use of high resolution geomagnetics, 2D-DC-
geoelectrics and induced polarisation in environmental investigations.
Paper presented at SAGEEP '94, Boston, USA.
Olivar, A., de Lime, L. and Sharma, M.M., 1990. A grain conductivity
approach to shaly sandstones. Geophysics, 55, 1347-1356.
Robain, H., Albouy, Y., Dabas, M., Descloitres, M., Camerlynck, C.,
Menchler, P. and Tabbagh, A., 1997, The location of infinite
electrodes in pole-pole electrical surveys: consequences for 2D
imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 41, 313-333.
Rucker, D., Fink, J.B. and Loke, M.H., 2011. Environmental Monitoring of
Leaks using Time Lapsed Long Electrode Electrical Resistivity.
Journal of Applied Geophysics, in press.
Sasaki, Y., 1992, Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical
simulation. Geophysical Prospecting, 40, 453-464.
Scott, J.B.T., Barker, R.D. Peacock, S., 2000. Combined seismic refraction and
electrical imaging. Procs. 6th Meeting of the European Association for
Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 3-7 Sept. 1997, Bochum,
Germany, EL05.
Seaton, W.J. and Burbey, T.J., 2000. Aquifer characterization in the Blue
Ridge physiographic province using resistivity profiling and borehole
geophysics : Geologic analysis. Journal of Environmental &
Engineering Geophysics, 5, no. 3, 45-58.
Silvester, P.P. and Ferrari, R.L., 1990, Finite elements for electrical engineers
(2nd. ed.) . Cambridge University Press.
Slater, L., Binley, A.M., Zaidman, M.D. and West, L.J., 1997, Investigation of
vadose zone flow mechanisms in unsaturated chalk using cross-
borehole ERT. Proceedings of the EEGS European Section 3rd
Meeting, Aarhus, Denmark, 17-20.
Summer, J.S., 1976, Principles of induced polarization for geophysical
exploration. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
Tong, L. and Yang, C., 1990, Incorporation of topography into two-
dimensional resistivity inversion. Geophysics, 55, 354-361.
Van Voorhis, G.D. Nelson, P.H. and Drake, T.L., 1973, Complex resistivity
spectra of porphyry copper mineralization. Geophysics, 38, 49-60.
Waddell, J. and Barton, K, 1995, Seeing beneath Rathcroghan. Archaeology
Ireland, Vol. 9, No. 1, 38-41.
White, R.M.S., Collins, S. and Loke, P., 2003. Resistivity and IP arrays,
optimised for data collection and inversion. Exploration Geophysics,
34, 229-232.
144
Witherly, K.E. and Vyselaar, J, 1990, A geophysical case history of the Poplar
Lake Copper-Molybdenum deposit, Houston Area, British Columbia.
in Fink, J.B., McAlister, E.O., Sternberg, B.K., Wieduwilt, W.G. and
Ward, S.H. (Eds), 1990, Induced polarization : Applications and case
histories : Investigations in Geophysics No. 4, Soc. Expl. Geophys.
145
A description of the different arrays types is given in the free tutorial notes on
electrical imaging (Loke 2011). Figure A.1 shows the arrangement of the
electrodes for some commonly used arrays. In general for an array with four
electrodes, there are three possible arrangements for the electrodes. The
Wenner array has three different variations (Figure A.1). The "normal" Wenner
array is actually the Wenner alpha array.
The Wenner beta array is a special case of the dipole-dipole array where the
"n" factor is always 1. The RES2DINV program will automatically convert a
Wenner beta array data file into a dipole-dipole array data set.
The general array with number code 11 is always given with a secondary sub-
array number code. If the arrays are actually one of the conventional arrays, the
number code for the conventional array is used as the sub-array number (for
example if it is a dipole-dipole array the sub-array number is then 3). If it is not
one of the conventional arrays, or if it is a mixture of different arrays (such as
the dipole-dipole and gradient), the sub-array number is given as 0.
146
The different variations of the pole-dipole array are shown in Figure A.2. If an
offset dipole-dipole array is used, the general array data format should be used
with a sub-array type of 0.
Figure A.1. Arrangement of the electrodes for some commonly used arrays.
The figure below shows an example of a data set collected by the OhmMapper
system together with the inversion model produced by the RES2DINV
program. The survey was conducted over an area with weathered granite. The
data set is given in the file OHMMAPPER.DAT. The measurements were
made using the dipole-dipole array with a dipole length "a" spacing of 10
metres and with n values of 0.5 to 3.5 (Appendix A). The data set has 732 data
points while the inversion model consist of 1240 cells.
Figure B.1. Example OhmMapper data set and inversion model. (a) Apparent
resistivity pseudosection measured with an OhmMapper mobile resistivity
surveying system. (b) Model section obtained by RES2DINV program.
148
DISCLAIMER
This software is provided "as is" without any express or implied warranties
including its suitability for a particular purpose. Neither this company nor the
subagent will assume responsibility for any damage or loss caused by the use
of this program. In the event of program bugs, every effort will be made to
correct the bugs. Faulty dongles or CDs will be replaced free of charge within
the first year from the date of purchase to registered users. Registered users are
entitled to free software updates and support for the first year. After the first
year, there is an annual fee for software updates and technical support. Please
contact Geotomo Software ([email protected]) for the annual fee that is
applicable to your dongle.
SUPPORT
Please contact your distributor if you have any questions concerning this
program. A frequent source of queries is when the results obtained are not what
you expect, or the program refuses to accept your data file. In such a case,
support will only be provided if a copy of the data file is sent together as an
attachment with your email, preferably compressed into a ZIP file. The most
common causes of problems are (a) the data in the DAT file is not given in the
correct RES2DINV format (b) excessive noise in the data set (particularly for
dipole-dipole surveys and/or IP data sets) (c) instrument malfunction or field
survey errors. It is only possible to trace the source of the problem if a copy of
the data file is provided. Please note that support is only available for
registered users of the full version of the program. It is not possible to provide
technical support for users of the demo version of this software. For technical
support, you can contact the software provider by email at the following
addresses. Please attach a copy of your data file to your email.
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
The following information will be required before technical support is
provided.
1). Your dongle ID number. This ID number is displayed near the middle of the
initial information box when the RES2DINV program starts up if the dongle is
attached to the computer.
2). The name of your company or institution.
3). Approximate date your company/institution purchased the software.
If you purchased the software more than one year ago, please contact Geotomo
Software on renewing the support.
149
What’s New
Version 3.00 - Major upgrade to Windows 3.1 and 95. Maximum number of
electrodes increased to 500. Multi-tasking support for Windows 95. Support for
any Windows compatible graphics card and printer.
Version 3.11 - The time taken by the finite-element subroutine to calculate the
Jacobian matrix is reduced. An option to use a finer mesh for the finite-
difference or finite-element forward modelling method is added.
Version 3.12 - Non-integer values for the “n” factor for the dipole-dipole, pole-
dipole and Wenner-Schlumberger arrays supported (please refer to Appendix
A). The maximum limits for the number of data levels and model layers
increased to 52 and 17 respectively.
Version 3.13 - The ratio of the largest electrode spacing to unit electrode
spacing for the Wenner and pole-pole array was increased from 32 to 64. The
maximum number of data levels is now 64. The maximum number of model
layers was also increased to 18.
Version 3.31 - An option for a used defined model added. In this model, the
user specifies the thickness of the first layer and the factor to increase the
thickness for each subsequent deeper layer. The program will also
automatically update the directory used for the input data files and the output
inversion files listed in the RES2DINV.INI file.
Version 3.34 - A few bug fixes. The user can now scale the depths of the model
layers so that the depth to the last layer can be much greater than the default
limit allowed by the program. When the program saves the model values in the
XYZ format, it will now also save the coordinates of the corners of the blocks
in the model. An option to use a very fine mesh in the vertical direction for
resistivity contrasts of greater than 250:1 was added, as well as an option for 6
nodes in the horizontal direction between adjacent electrodes.
Version 3.35 - The user can now set the maximum number of electrodes, from
150 to 1500, via the JACOBWIN.EXE program. Drawing of colour contour
sections is now significantly faster on most computers.
Version 3.36 - A robust least-squares inversion option was added. For very
noisy data with ‘outliers’, the resulting model will be less sensitive to such
datum points when the robust data inversion method is selected. For areas
where the subsurface geology has sharp interfaces, the robust model inversion
method will give better results.
Version 3.41 – Two new methods for topographic modelling using a damped
distorted grid and the inverse Schwartz-Christoffel transformation added.
Version 3.43 - Support for the Wenner Gamma array, and underwater surveys
with non-conventional arrays. Maximum number of electrodes increased to
2000. The program has also been optimised for data sets where the unit
electrode spacing has been reduced by half of the actual value so as to get a
model where the width of the blocks is half the usual size. This helps in cases
where there are very large lateral resistivity variations near the surface.
Version 3.45 - Option to save results in SURFER format added. Also support
for surveys with some electrodes underwater and some electrodes above the
water surface level added.
Version 3.46 - Minor additions for data in general array format. Option to use a
model with half the unit electrode spacing for data in general array format is
added (see the file RATCMIX2.DAT for an example). It is now possible to
carry out the inversion of data in the general array format with the demo
version, but the results will only be displayed temporarily on the screen during
the inversion. The damped distorted grid finite-element method is set as the
default method for topographic modelling.
Version 3.47 – An option to carry out the inversion of IP data sequentially was
added. Slight changes in the menu structure.
Version 3.52 – Option for surveys with floating electrodes added. Support for
topography in cross-borehole surveys included.
152
Version 3.53 – Sparse inversion option for very long survey lines (2000 to
16000 electrode positions) added. This method inverts the entire data set and
model at a single time to produce a continuous and seamless model. New
format for batch mode option script file which makes use of the files
containing the inversion parameters produced by the RES2DINV program.
Version 3.57 – Support to incorporate water layer into the inversion model for
surveys with floating electrodes added.
Version 3.59 – Support for time-lapse cross-borehole data added. Support for
inclined boreholes added.
Version 3.70 Beta - Trial version with support for multi-core PCs. New
inversion algorithm for time-lapse data. Complex resistivity inversion method
for I.P. data.
Version 4.00 - 64-bit version that can more than 4 GB RAM. This greatly
increases the maximum size of the data set and model that can be handled.
Supports up to 30 time series for time-lapse surveys.