ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

For
UNDER GROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR PERUNDURAI TOWN
PANCHAYAT

BY

TWAD BOARD, SEWERAGE DIVISION

PERUNDURAI

August -2019

EIA Consultant
HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI
(NABET Accredited vide Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA0083&)
MoEF Recognized Lab vide F. No. Q-15018/13/2016-CPW)

1
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... 11

Existing Drainage System .................................................................................................................. 11

Need for the Project ......................................................................................................................... 11
Categorization of the Project ............................................................................................................ 12
CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 20

1.1 Preamble: .............................................................................................................................. 20

1.2 Profile of Perundurai ............................................................................................................. 20
1.3 Existing Drainage System ...................................................................................................... 20
1.4 Need for the Project.............................................................................................................. 21
1.5 Scope of the Proposal ........................................................................................................... 21
1.6 Categorization of the Project ................................................................................................ 21
1.7 Objective of the Report ......................................................................................................... 22
1.8 Environmental Impact Assessment of the project will include ............................................ 22
1.9 Structure of the Report: ........................................................................................................ 23
CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 24
2.1 Salient Features of the project components are below : ........................................................ 25
2.2 Project Proposal .................................................................................................................... 26
2.2.1 Zone - I .......................................................................................................................... 26

2.2.2 Zone – II ......................................................................................................................... 26

2.2.3 Zone – III ........................................................................................................................ 27

2.2.4 Zone –IV ........................................................................................................................ 27

2.2.5 Project Details ............................................................................................................... 28

2.3 Sewage Treatment Plant ....................................................................................................... 32

2.4 Process Description ............................................................................................................... 34
2.4.1 Sewage Receiver ........................................................................................................... 35

2.4.2 Primary Treatment ........................................................................................................ 36

2.4.3 Fine Screening ............................................................................................................... 36

2.4.4 De-gritting ..................................................................................................................... 36

2.4.5 Flow Measurement ....................................................................................................... 37

2.4.6 Secondary Treatment Process ...................................................................................... 37

2
 2.4.7 Tertiary Treatment ........................................................................................................ 37

2.4.8 Chlorination................................................................................................................... 37

2.4.9 Sludge Handling System ................................................................................................ 38

2.4.10 Disposal of Treated Sewage .......................................................................................... 39

2.4.11 Future Expansion .......................................................................................................... 39

2.4.12 Gardening, Landscaping and Tree Plantation ............................................................... 39

2.5 Design Considerations........................................................................................................... 39

2.6 Land Details ........................................................................................................................... 41
3 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................... 43

3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 43

3.2 Environmental Legislations ................................................................................................... 43
3.2.1 Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 ....................................................... 43
3.2.2 Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 ............................................................. 43
3.2.3 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 ..................................................................................... 44
3.2.4 Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 ...................................................................................... 44
3.2.5 Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 ................................................................................ 44
3.2.6 The Noise Pollution (Regulation And Control) Rules, 2000 .................................................. 45
3.3 World Bank Policies............................................................................................................... 45
3.3.1 Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01 ............................................................................... 45
3.3.2 Cultural Property - OP 11.03 ................................................................................................. 46
3.3.3 Natural Habitats – OP/BP 4.04 .............................................................................................. 46
3.3.4 Forests – OP/BP 4.36 ............................................................................................................ 46
3.3.5 Pest Management - OP 4.09 ................................................................................................. 47
3.3.6 Involuntary Resettlement - OP/BP 4.12 ................................................................................ 47
3.3.7 Indigenous Peoples – OP/BP 4.20 ......................................................................................... 47
3.3.8 Sustainabilty Guidelines ........................................................................................................ 47
3.4 Legal/Regulatory Clearances For The Project ....................................................................... 48
3.4.1 Clearances/ NOC Required from Competent Authority ....................................................... 48
4 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ................................................................................... 50

4.1 Preamble ............................................................................................................................... 50

4.2 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive Areas ...................................................................... 50
4.3 Physical Conditions ............................................................................................................... 57

3
 4.3.1 PIA District Profile ......................................................................................................... 57

4.3.2 Climatic Conditions ....................................................................................................... 57

4.3.3 Natural resources of Erode district ............................................................................... 58

4.3.4 Land Use & Land Cover ................................................................................................. 60

4.3.5 Topography ................................................................................................................... 63

4.3.6 Geology of PIA District .................................................................................................. 65

4.3.7 Geomorphology of PIA District ..................................................................................... 65

4.3.8 Hydrogeology of PIA District ......................................................................................... 66

4.3.9 Drainage Pattern in PIA District .................................................................................... 68

4.3.10 Soils in PIA District......................................................................................................... 68

4.3.11 Seismicity ...................................................................................................................... 69

4.4 Air Environment .................................................................................................................... 70

4.4.1 Meteorological Conditions ............................................................................................ 70

4.4.2 Meteorological Data Collection .................................................................................... 71

4.4.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data ................................................. 71

4.4.4 Meteorological data during Study Period ..................................................................... 72

4.4.5 Atmospheric Inversion .................................................................................................. 73

4.5 Baseline Environment ........................................................................................................... 74

4.6 Ambient Air Quality............................................................................................................... 74
4.6.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations ..................................................................... 74

4.6.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency ....................................... 77

4.6.3 Results and Discussions................................................................................................. 78

4.6.4 Observations ................................................................................................................. 83

4.7 Noise Environment................................................................................................................ 83

4.7.1 Results and Discussions................................................................................................. 83

4.7.2 Observations ................................................................................................................. 84

4.8 Water Environment .............................................................................................................. 87

4.8.1 Surface Water Resources .............................................................................................. 87

4.8.2 Surface Water Quality Assessment ............................................................................... 87

4
 4.8.3 Results and Discussions................................................................................................. 92

4.8.4 Groundwater resources ................................................................................................ 94

4.8.5 Groundwater Quality .................................................................................................... 94

4.8.6 Results and Discussions............................................................................................... 100

4.9 Soil as a resource and its Quality ........................................................................................ 100

4.9.1 Results and Discussions............................................................................................... 104

4.10 Ecological Environment....................................................................................................... 104

4.10.1 Flora ............................................................................................................................ 104

4.10.2 Fauna ........................................................................................................................... 105

4.11 Socio Economic profile ........................................................................................................ 106

4.11.1 Socio Economic Aspects .............................................................................................. 107

4.11.2 Population and Household Size .................................................................................. 108

4.11.3 Sex Ratio...................................................................................................................... 108

4.11.4 Scheduled Caste (SC) & Scheduled Tribes (ST) ........................................................... 108

4.11.5 Education & Literacy ................................................................................................... 109

4.11.6 Health Facilities ........................................................................................................... 109

4.11.7 Economic Activity ........................................................................................................ 110

4.11.8 Social Economic Profile of the study area ................................................................... 110

4.11.9 Employment and Livelihood within study area .......................................................... 111

4.11.10 Educational Infrastructure within study area ......................................................... 112

4.11.11 Health facility within the study area ....................................................................... 114

4.11.12 Drinking water facilities within the study area ....................................................... 115

4.11.13 Summary ................................................................................................................. 118

4.12 Socio-Economic Data .......................................................................................................... 118

4.12.1 Demography ................................................................................................................ 118

4.12.2 Literacy ........................................................................................................................ 119

4.12.3 Land use Pattern ......................................................................................................... 119

4.12.4 Agriculture................................................................................................................... 121

4.12.5 Irrigation...................................................................................................................... 121

5
 4.12.6 Animal Husbandry and Fisheries................................................................................. 121

4.12.7 Mineral Resources ...................................................................................................... 122

4.12.8 Industries .................................................................................................................... 122

4.12.9 Education .................................................................................................................... 123

4.12.10 Workforce ............................................................................................................... 123

4.12.11 Medical and Health Facilities .................................................................................. 124

4.13 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................................ 124

4.14 Project Site Features ........................................................................................................... 125
4.15 Raw Sewage Characteristics................................................................................................ 131
4.16 Treated Effluent Quality...................................................................................................... 131
5 PREDICTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .......................................................... 132

5.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 132

5.2 IMPACT EVALUATION.......................................................................................................... 133
5.2.1 Air Quality ................................................................................................................... 133

5.2.2 Noise Quality ............................................................................................................... 134

5.2.3 Odour Problems .......................................................................................................... 134

5.2.4 Water Quality .............................................................................................................. 134

5.2.5 Solid Waste Handling .................................................................................................. 135

5.2.6 Cultural and Socio-Economic Impacts......................................................................... 135

5.2.7 Outfall location and design ......................................................................................... 135

5.2.8 Existing utility services ................................................................................................ 136

5.3 Proposed Mitigation Measures........................................................................................... 136

5.3.1 Air Quality ................................................................................................................... 136

5.3.2 Noise Quality ............................................................................................................... 136

5.3.3 Odour Problems .......................................................................................................... 138

5.3.4 Water Quality and Disposal ........................................................................................ 138

5.3.5 Soil Quality .................................................................................................................. 141

5.3.6 Solid Waste Handling .................................................................................................. 141

5.3.7 Mitigation measures for Existing Utility Services........................................................ 142

6
 5.3.8 Health and Safety ........................................................................................................ 142

5.3.9 Green Belt Development ............................................................................................ 145

5.3.10 Energy Efficiency ......................................................................................................... 149

6 PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...................................................................................................... 150

7. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................................................ 155

7.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 155

7.2 Environmental Management Plan ...................................................................................... 155
7.3 Environmental Monitoring Plan .......................................................................................... 173
7.4 Budgetary Allocation For Implemetation Of Environmental Aspects During The
Construction & Operation Phase Of The Project ................................................................ 176
8. IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ........................................................... 194

8.1 Grievance Mechanism ........................................................................................................ 194

8.1.1 Grievance Redressal Committee ................................................................................. 194

9. PROJECT BENEFITS .......................................................................................................................... 196

10. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................... 197

Quality Policy of HECS ......................................................................................................................... 198

QCI-NABET - EIA Accreditation............................................................................................................ 199

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 : Proposed Sewerage Subproject Components

Table 2.2: Quality of incoming sewage and treated effluent from STP
Table 3.1 - Clearances/ NOC Required from Competent Authority
Table-4.1 - Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km fromProject Boundary
Table 0-2 Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km radius from Project Boundary
Table 0-1 District land use/land cover statistics for Erode District
Table 0-2Climatological Summary –Coimbatore (Pelamedu) Region (1971-2000)
Table 0-3 Meteorology Data for the Study Period (April-June 2017)
Table 0-4 Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations

7
Table 0-5 Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters (NAAQ)
Table 0-6 Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants
Table 0-7 Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels
Table 0-8 Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters
Table 0-9 Details of Surface water sampling locations
Table 0-10 Physicochemical Parameters of Surface water samples from study area
Table 0-11- Surface water quality criteria for different uses
Table 0-12 Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations
Table 0-13 Physico chemical analysis of Ground water samples from study area
Table 0-14 Soil & Sediment Quality Monitoring Locations
Table 0-15 Physico Chemical parameters of soil samples from the study area
Table 0-16 Floral species observed within the study area
Table 0-17 Fauna species observed within the study area
Table 0-18 Social Indicators of PIA District
Table 0-19 Educational Infrastructure in PIA District and State
Table 0-20 Socio Economic analysis: Health care
Table 0-21 List of villages and Town in the study area
Table 0-22 Summary of Socio-economic indicators within the study area
Table 0-23 Summary of Employment and Livelihood within the study area
Table 0-24 Details of Education facilities within study area
Table 0-25 Literates population and the percentage within the study area
Table 0-26 Health facility within the study area
Table 0-27 Drinking water sources in the study area
Table 4-29 Study Area Population Statistics
Table 4-30 Study Area Children’s Details
Table 4-31 Study Area Literacy Statistics
Table 4-32 Land use Pattern during 2011-02
Table 4-33 Area under principal crops during 2011 -12 in Hectares.
Table 4-34 Livestock Census 2012 – Erode District
Table 4-35 Industries in Perundurai Town
Table 4-36 Lists of Educational Institutions in the Study town
Table 4-37 Workforces in the Study Area
Table 4-38 Gender wise Work Force Details

8
Table 4-39 Health care facilities in the Study Area
Table 4.40 Site Environmental Features
Table 4-41 Raw Sewage Characteristics
Table 4-42 Treated Effluent Quality
Table-4-43 Salient features of the proposed STP site
Table 5-1 Trees proposed for Green Belt Development
Table 7.1 : Environmental Management Plan for Pre- Construction, Construction and
Operation
Table 7-2 Environmental Monitoring Plan Pre-Construction & Construction Phase
Table 7- 3 Environmental Monitoring Plan Operation Phase
Table 7-4: EMP Cost of the Project
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1 - Google view of the project site
Figure 2-2 - Flow Diagram
Figure 2.3 - Detailed Scheme plan
Figure 2-4 Google View of STP Site at Panikampalayam
Figure 0.5 - STP Layout
Figure 0.6 - STP Flow Diagram
Figure 0-1Map showing the Satellite Image of the study area
Figure 0-2Environmental sensitive areas covering within 15 km from project boundary
Figure 0-3 Mineral Map of Tamil Nadu
Figure 0-4 Land Use Map of Erode District
Figure 0-5Land Use/ land cover Pattern of PIA district
Figure 0-6 Physical map of Tamil Nadu
Figure 0-7Hydrogeology Map of PIA district
Figure 0-8 Soil Map of PIA district
Figure 0-9 Seismicity Map of India
Figure 0-10 Wind Rose during April-June 2017.
Figure 0-11 Atmospheric inversion level at the project site
Figure 0-12 Map showing the Ambient Air Quality monitoring locations
Figure 0-13 Trends of Measured Ambient Concentrations Primary Pollutant in the Study
Area
Figure 0-14 Map showing the noise monitoring locations

9
Figure 0-15 Map showing the surface water monitoring locations
Figure 0-16 Map showing the groundwater monitoring locations
Figure 4-17 Land Use / Land Cover Map of Project Study Area
Figure 4-18 Land Use Pattern of Project Study Area
Figure 4-19 Satellite Image for Treated Effluent Disposal Point from STP
Figure 5.1 – STP Layout with Green Belt
Figure 5.2 – Pumping Station Layout with Green Belt

LIST OF ANNEXURE
Annexure 1……………………………………………………….………….….. Land ownership details
Annexure 2……………………………………………………….………….…..G.O.
Annexure 3……………………………………………………….………….…..Disposal permission letter.
Annexure4…………………………………………………Component wise plan of action

10
 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Tamil Nadu Government made a policy announcement of providing Under
Ground Sewerage Scheme in all urban local bodies in a phased manner at District head
quarter towns. Perundurai Town is a selection grade Town Panchayat in Erode District
of Tamil Nadu State. It lies at a latitude of11o16’26” N. and Longitude of 77o35’18”E. It
is situated at 20 Km from Erode Town and nearer to National high way 47.This Town
Panchayat is bounded by Karumandichellipalayam TP in North, Ingur village Panchayat
in South, Vadamugam Vellode village panchayat in East and Pattakarampalayam,
Kullampalayam and Ponmudi Village panchayats in West.

Existing Drainage System

Perundurai Town is supplied with 135 lpcd water supply at present. Perundurai town
does not have any underground sewerage scheme at present. Individual septic tanks are in
use for collecting the night soil from toilets. However the sullage water from kitchens,
bathrooms, wash basins, cloth washing etc. is directly discharged into existing road side
open drains. In places where economically weaker sections of the society reside, there are
no septic tanks either and total waste water is discharged into road side open drains,
resulting in large scale pollution of existing natural water courses i.e. major storm water
drains. The discharge of raw untreated sewage/effluent into storm water drains is creating
unhygienic conditions around drains, lake and posing serious health hazard. The solid
wastes are directly dumped in the dumpyard at Panikampalayam.

Need for the Project

With the rapid growth of the population in Perundurai town panchayat, the
lack of proper drainage system and sewage treatment facility has become an ever –
larger problem for public and from environmental point of view. Therefore, the
TamilnaduGovernment has decided to provide an Underground Sewerage Scheme with
STP at Pannikkampalayam, within the Solid waste dumping yard, Perundurai as a part
of urban development project for TWAD Board, Perundurai.
Project Proposal
This project area comprises of 15 wards in Perundurai town in Erode District.
The area covered by Perundurai Town within Town Panchayat limits as per
topographical survey map is 23.39 km2. Based on terrain, 4 numbers of main drainage
zones have been identified for Perundurai Town with each zone draining towards a

11
lowest point. Drainage Zone-I sub divided into two sub areas, Drainage Zone – II
subdivided into four sub areas, Drainage Zone-III has two sub areas, Drainage zone-IV
two sub areas.
Package - Includes sewer works, lift stations, pumping stations, pumping
mains including civil and electromechanical works and establishment of Sewage
Treatment Plant.
Design Period
Design period is taken as 30 years for this Underground Sewerage Scheme,
keeping the base year as 2015. Intermediate design period is 15 years from 2015 to
2030 and the ultimate stage will be at 2045.

Project Description
Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board have proposed to establish
Underground Sewerage System connecting 15 wards in Perundurai town by
categorizing it to 4 zones and treating the sewage generated by setting up a Sewage
Treatment Plant of 3.14 MLD capacity using FAB Technology. The sewage generation
rate are adopted to be 100 lpcd.

Salient Features of the project components are below :

 Total length of the sewerage network is 47.496 km

 Manholes construction – 1932 Nos
 6 Numbers of Lifting Stations
 4 numbers of Pumping stations
 House Service Connection – 5700 Nos
 Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 3.14 MLD with FAB Technology at Compost
yard near Panikampalayam in Perundurai.
 The treated sewage is disposed through 400mm dia RCCpipe to nearby Kuttai at 50m
from the STP which flows through gravity to large odai at Perundurai.

Categorization of the Project

The proposed project is classified as per ECSMF Environmental Categorization

as E1 (Sewerage Network, Lifting station, Pumping Station and Treatment Plant). Hence

12
this project requires detailed Environmental Impact Assessment and preparation of
management measures.
As per TNPCB Industrial Categorization, STP is categorized as Red Category (Code No.
1081- Common Treatment and Disposal Facilities), as per re-categorization of
Industries vide B.P. No. 06 dated 02.08.2016.

Cost Details
The total cost of the project is Rs.54.78 crores and the maintenance cost per
annum is Rs.110.84 crores for five years.
Environmental Regulatory Framework
Clearances/NOC required for laying of pipe lines from various user agencies are as
follows:

 State Highways – 1 No
 Consent to Establishment under Air and Water has been obtained from Tamil Nadu
Pollution Control Board.
 Labour Working License

BASELINE STUDY

a) Meteorological Environment

The micro-meteorological conditions during the study period for hourly data of wind
speed, wind direction and temperature were recorded at the project site. The nearest
Indian Meteorological department (IMD) station located to project site is Coimbatore
(Pelamedu) the annually determined wind direction is fromSouth West to North East.

The site specific meteorological data of study period during the study period (April –
June 2017) Maximum temperature is 420C, Minimum temperature is 240C and Average
temperature is 32.60C. TheAverage Relative humidity is 55%. Average Wind Speed in
study period is 3.9 m/s. Study period predominant wind pattern is from South to North.

b) Ambient Air Quality

Ambient Air Quality was monitored at 8 locations within the study area. The particulate
matter PM2.5 ranged between 17.8–28.4 μg/m3 across the monitoring locations, PM10

13
ranged between 37.65–50.1 μg/m3, SO2 varied between 6.8 – 9.7μg/m3, NO2 varied
between 15.09 - 23.40 μg/m3,and some are BDL, all the parameters are well within the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards at all monitoring locations during the study
period.

c) Noise Environment

The existing ambient noise levels were monitored using precision noise level meter in
and around the project site at 10 km radius at 8 locations during study period (April-
June 2017)
 In commercial area time noise levels varied from60.5dB(A) to61.5dB(A) and night
time noise levels varied from 51.3 dB(A) to 53.8 dB(A), which is within prescribed
limit by MoEF&CC (65 dB(A)) Day time &55dB(A) Night time).

 In residential area day time noise levels varied from 48.6 dB (A) to 53.5dB (A) and
night time noise levels varied from 40.6dB (A) to 43.6 dB (A) across the sampling
stations. The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient
noise levels in Residential area noise are within the limit prescribed by MoEF&CC
(55 dB (A) Day time & 45 dB (A) Night time).

d) Water Environment

The prevailing status of water quality at 4 locations for surface water and 8 locations for
ground water have been assessed during April 2017.The standard methods prescribed
in IS were followed for sample collection, preservation and analysis in the laboratory for
various physiochemical parameters.

Ground water quality

 The ground water results of the study area indicate that the average pH
ranges is varied between 7.45-7.81.

 The desirable limit of the Total Dissolved Solids is 500 mg/l and
permissible limit is 2000 mg/l. Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied
between 746 mg/l -1174 mg/l for the ground water and its meets the
permissible limits of IS 10500: 2012

14
  The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250 mg/l and permissible
limit is 1000 mg/l. The chloride content in the ground water for study
area is ranges between 143 mg/l -250 mg/l
 The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible
limit is 400mg/l. The sulphate content of the ground water of the study
area is varied between 54 mg/l -107 mg/l meeting the desirable limit of
the IS 10500: 2012.
 The Total hardness range is between 293-533 mg/l for ground water and
all location within the permissible limit of the IS 10500:2012.

Surface water quality

 In the surface water the pH varied between 7.32 – 7.87.
 The Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 407-593 mg/l for the
surface water The TDS value of some of the samples meeting class A and
remaining meeting Class B standards of IS: 2296 -1982.
 The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible
limit is 1000 mg/l. The chloride content in the ground water for study
area is ranges between 98 mg/l -150 mg/l
 The Sulphate content of the surface water meeting the minimum range of
35 mg/l and maximum range of 48 mg/l. The surface water samples
meeting the class A standard of IS: 2296 1982.
 The Total hardness ranges is between 125 – 225 mg/l for ground water
its meeting the permissible limit of the IS 2296 - 1982
 DO of the sample varies between 5.1 – 6 mg/l
 BOD of the sample varies between 3.2–5.9 mg/l
 COD of the sample varies between 9.7 – 15.2 mg/l

e) Land Environment

Assessment of soil characteristics is of paramount importance since the vegetation

growth, agricultural practices and production is directly related to the soil fertility and
quality. Soil sampling was carried out at eight (08) locations in the study area. It is
observed that,

15
  The pH of the soil samples ranged from 6.67 -7.71 indicating that the soils
are almost neutral in nature.
 Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from 244-528 μS/cm. As the EC
value is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline in nature
 The Moisture Content of the soil samples varied from 8.78-21.7 (%).
 Nitrogen content ranged from 56.3 to 259 mg/ha
 Phosphorous ranged from 97 to 198 mg/ha
 Potassium content ranges from 53 to 200 mg/ha.

f) Greenbelt Development
 Green belt is proposed to implement in the STP, and Main Pumping Stations.
About 1000 trees of native species are proposed to be planted.

 The impact during the construction and operation phase on land use ,
topography, surface water, ground water, ambient air quality, noise quality,
land environment, traffic, ecology and social aspects have been assessed and
management measures have been identified. Impacts will be minimal on
account of the proposed mitigation measures.

POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

When identifying the potential impacts of a new project on the existing

environment, such as the proposed Sewage Treatment Plant situated at
Panikampalayam, Perundurai. Construction of sewer line with sewage treatment plant
and there after operation of this system, if undertaken without a proper understanding
of the relationships inherent in environmental function, can be accompanied by
disruptions to the environment, from which it may take a long time to regain
equilibrium. In human terms, this may mean that generations must function in a
debilitated environment and suffer many possible associated socio-economic hardships
and financial losses.

Some of the major environmental impacts of sewerage system include damage to

local ecosystems, loss of productive agricultural lands, demographic change, accelerated
urbanization, and introduction of disease. The need of development and growth in the
area must be matched with the conservation of the existing natural resources.

16
 In general, construction of a new sewage treatment plant will have a positive
environmental impact on the town. It is expected to produce a long term improvement
in public health of the residents, as well as to significantly reduce a source of chronic
water pollution of an ecologically valuable portion if the water body where the
sewerage drains.

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)

 An Environmental Management planning wing to regulate, monitor and audit
positive and/or negative environmental impacts by considering day-to-day
operations of the STP.
 TWAD will provide proper mitigative measures to mitigate the impacts.
 The collected raw sewages from the individual houses shall be treated by
common STP for efficient treatment and it meets the prescribed norms by
TNPCB.
 The treated wastewater from the common STP after confirming the
prescribed norms will be discharged to nearest kuttai.
 Rainwater harvesting program shall also be implemented for conservation of
water.
 Occupational Health & Safety shall be followed for the working employees.
 Dense green belt facility can be provided with in the STP, Pumping stations
premises.

Implementation and Institutional Arrangements

The proposed project is to provide an Underground Sewerage Supply Scheme to
Perundurai Town Panchayat. This project will be implemented by TWAD under the scheme
of SMIF-TN II-1 at an estimating cost of Rs. 54.78 Crores.The project is proposed to be
implemented by TWAD through Prospective contractor. The environmental management
plan identified for the construction will be included in thebid documents for ensuring
implementation of the environmental safeguards. Implementationof the management
measures by the contractor will be ensured by TWAD Board and reporton ECSMF
compliance will be submitted to TNUIFSL periodically.The management measures

17
 identified for operation phase will be taken up by the Prospective contractor upto
maintenance period and beyond that by TWAD Board.

Grievance Mechanism
TWAD Board has proposed to provide Underground Sewerage Supply Scheme
toPerundurai town and treat the Sewage in Sewage Treatment Plant of 3.14 MLD
usingFluidized Bio-reactor Technology. The management measures identified for
theoperation phase will be taken up by the TWAD Board upon completion of
constructionactivities. The TWAD Board will have Grievance Redressal mechanisms to
handle thegrievances of the project. A project level grievance Redressal committee will be
set up andthe members are as follows (preferably one of them as women)
 Executive Engineer (Projects –TWAD Board)
 Executive Officer (Perundurai Town Panchayat)
 A person who is publicly known in the local area

TWAD Board will submit monthly reports on the status of compliance with the ECSMF
requirements to TNUIFSL.

PROJECT BENEFITS
 Perundurai Town Hygienic will be improved
 Mixing of Sewage water into Land, Canals, and Lakes & Ponds will be reduced
 Ground Water degradation will be reduced
 Soil contamination will be reduced
 Sewageodour can be reduced in the open areaOverall Water pollution and
soil pollution due to Sewage will be reduced and the safe environment will be
improved in and around the project area i.e., Perundurai Town.

CONCLUSION
 The impact on environment will be minimum and can be further reduced by
implementing various mitigating measures and regular monitoring programs.
 The proposed sewage treatment plant have beneficial impacts in terms of
hygienic and safe disposal of treated effluent with incidental benefits like
employment opportunities both in the construction stage as well as operational

18
 stage. Also the modernized installation will facilitate greater level of operating
safety.
 Due to the proposed project the socio economic activities will be developed in
and around the project area.
 The monitoring program on various environmental parameters will be
undertaken for the continual improvements towards protecting the environment
to achieve the above requirements.
 Proper methods have been planned to safe and secured disposal of treated
effluent and handling of solid waste.
 Dense Greenbelt can be developed around the project site. So odour will be
reduced for the surrounding residential peoples (Panikampalayam Village).

19
 CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Preamble:

Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board (TWAD Board) is a statutory
body formed by Government of Tamil Nadu. It is responsible for the implementation
of providing water supply and sewerage facilities to the public of the entire state of
Tamil Nadu except Chennai Metropolitan Area. The activities of TWAD board will be
guided and monitored by the Board of Directors of senior level administrators and
Engineers of Government of Tamil Nadu.

The Director of Town Panchayat, Chennai on behalf of Perundurai Town

Panchayat has formulated a project for providing "Underground Sewerage Scheme
(UGSS)" for Perundurai Town. The primary objective of this project is providing
sewerage and waste water treatment works for Perundurai Town with special
emphasis on best available technology to optimize the project implementation
period.

1.2 Profile of Perundurai

Perundurai town panchayat is located at a distance of 14.6 km from ENE of

Erode district. 24.5Km from NNW of Gobichettipalayam, 29.7Km from SW of
Tiruppur and 29 Km from South of Kangayam. The location of the town is located at
latitude 11.255402 to 11.280655 N and longitude 77.574283 to 77.592307 E.
Average Elevation of the town is 292m (958 ft). As per 2011 census, the population
of Perundurai is 24, 930.

Males constitute 48.93% of the population and female constitute 51.07%.

Perundurai has an average literacy rate of 85.93%.

1.3 Existing Drainage System

Perundurai Town is supplied with 135 lpcd water supply at present. Perundurai
town does not have any underground sewerage scheme at present. Individual septic
tanks are in use for collecting the night soil from toilets. However the sullage water

20
 from kitchens, bathrooms, wash basins, cloth washing etc. is directly discharged into
existing road side open drains. In places where economically weaker sections of the
society reside, there are no septic tanks either and total waste water is discharged into
road side open drains, resulting in large scale pollution of existing natural water courses
i.e. major storm water drains. The discharge of raw untreated sewage/effluent into
storm water drains is creating unhygienic conditions around drains, lake and posing
serious health hazard. The solid wastes are directly dumped in the dumpyard at
Panikampalayam.

1.4 Need for the Project

With the rapid growth of the population in Perundurai town panchayat, the lack of
proper drainage system and sewage treatment facility has become an ever – larger
problem for public and from environmental point of view. Therefore, the
TamilnaduGovernment has decided to provide an Underground Sewerage Scheme
with STP at Pannikkampalayam, within the Solid waste dumping yard, Perundurai
as a part of urban development project for TWAD Board, Perundurai.

1.5 Scope of the Proposal

The scope of the proposal is to provide Underground Sewerage System with

Sewerage network, Lifting stations, Pumping stations and Pumping Mains covering the
entire area of Perundurai Town Panchayat and treat the collected sewage in 3.14 MLD STP
at Compost yard near Panikampalayam.
This Project is implemented under Kfw assisted SMIF – TN. The implementing agency is
TWAD Board.

1.6 Categorization of the Project

The proposed project is classified as per ECSMF Environmental Categorization as

E1 (Sewerage Network, Lifting station, Pumping Station and Treatment Plant). Hence this
project requires detailed Environmental Impact Assessment and preparation of
management measures.

21
As per TNPCB Industrial Categorization, STP is categorized as Red Category (Code No.
1081- Common Treatment and Disposal Facilities), as per re-categorization of Industries
vide B.P. No. 06 dated 02.08.2016.

1.7 Objective of the Report

 To identify the potential impact by the UGSS on related environmental aspects and
identify management measures.

 To develop a set of practices to be followed during preconstruction, construction

and post construction periods in order to avoid the foreseeable negative impacts.

1.8 Environmental Impact Assessment of the project will include

 Collection of baseline information on various components of the environment

 Identification of areas and aspects those are environmentally or socially significant
 Conducting community consultations on various environmental and social aspects of the
project and documenting the same.
 Determining the magnitude of environmental impacts and formulation of mitigation
measures for consideration and incorporation during planning/design, construction and
operational phases of the project implementation
 Preparation of environmental enhancement plans for improving the environmental quality
of the project corridor; and
 Preparation of environmental management plans including a program for
monitoringenvironmental impacts, implementation schedule and responsibilities. It also
specifiesrequirements of Institutional strengthening, if any, supervision program and
contractingprocedures for execution of environmental mitigation works.

22
1.9 Structure of the Report:

The structure of EIA report in given below

 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 Chapter 1 – Introduction
 Chapter 2 – Project Description
 Chapter 3 – Environmental Regulatory Framework
 Chapter 4 – Baseline Environmental Profile
 Chapter 5 – Assessment of Anticipated Impacts and Mitigation Measures
 Chapter 6 – Environmental Management Plan
 Chapter 7 – Public Consultation
 Chapter 8 –Implementation and Institutional Arrangements
 Chapter 9 – Project Benefits
 Chapter10 - Conclusion

23
 CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board have proposed to establish Underground
Sewerage System connecting 15 wards in Perundurai town by categorizing it to 4 zones and
treating the sewage generated by setting up a Sewage Treatment Plant of 3.14 MLD capacity
using FAB Technology. The sewage generation rate was adopted to be 110 lpcd.
The proposed project involves the construction of 6 lifting stations and 4 pumping
stations for conveying the sewage collected at various locations to inlet chamber of proposed
3.14 MLD capacity STP at Panikampalayam Compost yard.
The Google view of the project site is shown in Figure 2.1. The flow diagram of
UGSS is given Figure2.2. The land ownership details are given in Annexure– Iand the
government order for this project is given in Annexure-II.

Figure 2-1 - Google view of the project site

24
 Figure 2-2 - Flow Diagram

2.1 Salient Features of the project components are below :

 Total length of the sewerage network is 47.496 km

 Manholes construction – 1932 Nos
 6 Numbers of Lifting Stations
 4 numbers of Pumping stations
 House Service Connection – 5700 Nos
 Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 3.14 MLD with FAB Technology at Compost yard
near Panikampalayam in Perundurai.
 The treated sewage is disposed through 400mm dia RCCpipe to nearby Kuttai at 50m
from the STP which flows through gravity to large odai at Perundurai.

25
 The project cost is Rs. 54.78 crores and the Commissioner of Municipal
Administrative Sanction was accorded vide G.O. (D) No. 24, dated: 17-01-2013

2.2 Project Proposal

Perundurai Town Panchayat is located at a distance of 14.6 Km from ENE of

Erode town. Area of the Perundurai town panchayat is 23.39 Sq.km. With the rapid
expansion and urbanization of Perundurai Town, an underground sewerage scheme
has been formulated for the town and the collection system works are ready to
progress. The final sewage from the main pumping will be redirected to the
proposed Sewage Treatment Plant for final treatment and the treated effluent will
be redirected to the Kuttai (Permission letter Enclosed).

The sewage from the residential area is discharged into the corresponding
underground sewerage system. Sewerage zones are interconnected with the sub
pumping stations and ultimately collecting into the main pumping
station, where sewage will be pumped to the Sewage Treatment Plant. The
treatment system adopted is Fluidized Aerobic Bio Reactor Technology (FAB).

2.2.1 Zone - I

This pumping station at Iyerkulam covers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11/P, 12/P&14 wards

and the length of collection system is 31,444m. It has 3001 Domestic House
Service connections and 167 Commercial Buildings.

2.2.2 Zone – II

This pumping station at Chennivalasu covers 8,9,10 wards and the length of
collection system is 10,829m. It has 1171 Domestic House Service connections
and 65 Commercial Buildings.

26
2.2.3 Zone – III

This pumping station at Cinna Vettuvapalayam covers 13 wards and the length
of collection system is 5687m. It has 688 Domestic House Service connections
and 38 Commercial Buildings.

2.2.4 Zone –IV

This pumping station at Panikkampalayam covers 11/P & 12 wards and the
length of collection system is 3853m. It has 442 Domestic House Service
connections and 25 Commercial Buildings.

Detailed Scheme plan is enclosed as Figure 2.3.

Figure 2.3- Detailed Scheme plan

27
 2.2.5 Project Details

Sewerage system is designed as a separate underground system catering only to

domesticwastewater; storm runoff generated during rains will be carried by
existing open drains anddispose into natural streams/ water bodies. Industrial
wastewater will not be disposed intosewers. Sewerage system is designed for
100 liters per capital per day, based on sewagegeneration rate of 80% of water
supply. Sewerage system is design with gravity flow as far aspossible, however
topography do not permit a complete gravity system from collection to inlet
atthe STP, and therefore wherever required sewage lifting and pumping stations
introduced tooptimize the system design.

Table 2.1: Proposed Sewerage Subproject Components

Infrastructure Function Description Location
1 Sewer Network Collect sewage Total length of Collection Sewers will be laid underground
from houses and system: 46.497 km; in the roads and internal streets in
convey to lifting the project area.
/ pumping Size: 150-300 mm dia: Sewers will be laid in all roads
stations by Stoneware pipes – 41.121 and internal streets in the project
gravity Km area.
200-450 mm dia RCC pipes
– 6.375 Km

Manholes – 1932 Nos

2 Sewage Convey sewage Length: 9.00 km; Pumping mains will be laid from
Pumping from lifting Size: 150 – 350 mm dia 6 lifting stations to nearby higher
Mains stations to higher CIpipes level manhole/ pumping station,
level manholes; and from pumping station to
and pumping pumping stations / STP. These
stations to STP, will be laid mostly along edge of
under pressure the roads.
3 Sewage lift Collect sewage Sewage lift stations (LS): 6 Lift well will be constructed in
stations (LS) from low level Nos. smallavailable extent of land or
sewer and pump Components of LS along the road side. Lift stations
to higher level  Suction well of dia 2.0 m are of 2.0 m -3.0 m dia to
manholes -3.0 m and depth 4.00 – accommodate two small capacity
7.00 m. submersible sewage pumps and
 Non-clog submersible 2.0 m x 1.5m size room or Kiosk
pump to accommodate Pump, Control
Sets Panel. Lift stations are proposed
 Pumproom with at following locations:
control panel box

28
a) Lifting Station 1) At Thoppupalayam for
-1 Zone– II area:
The raw sewage at LS-1 is
pumped to main gravity manhole
MH No . 263 of Zone-II.

b) Lifting Station 2) At Beerangimedu (Road

-2 side) for Zone– II area:
The raw sewage at LS-2 is
pumped to main gravity manhole
MH No . 171 of Zone-II.

c) Lifting Station 3) At Ashok Nagar (Road

-3 side) for Zone– II area:
The raw sewage at LS-3 is
pumped to main gravity manhole
MH No . 33 of Zone-II.

d) Lifting Station 4) At Periyavettuvampalayam

-4 for Zone– III area:
The raw sewage at LS-4 is
pumped to main gravity manhole
MH No . 74 of Zone-III. (near
Chinnavettuvampalayam)

e) Lifting Station 5) At Panikampalayam for

-5 Zone– IV area:
The raw sewage at LS-5 is
pumped to main gravity manhole
MH No . 132 of Zone-IV.

f) Lifting Station 6) At Kuyavankuttai for

-6 Zone– I area:
The raw sewage at LS-6 is
pumped to main gravity manhole
MH No . 1032 of Zone-I.

29
4 Sub-Pumping Collect sewage Sub- Pumping stations: 2 Sub pumping
Stations(SPS) from lift stations Nos. stations are proposed to lift the
pumpto Main Sewage collected by gravity and
Pumping Station from Lifting stations are pumped
to Main Pumping stations. Sub
Pumping stations are proposed at
following locations:
New sewage pumping
station are proposed in
the identified vacant
lands belongs to
CMWSSB/ GCC/
Govt.(Revenue lands),
for which necessary land
alienation action initiated.

a) SPS-I Components of SPS – I 1) At Chinnavettuvampalayam

Suction well Dia 3.0 and for Zone-III area:
depth from 4.50 m The raw sewage from SPS-I is
Non-clog submersible pump
pumped to main gravity manhole
sets
MH No . 651 of Zone-1 area.

b) SPS-II Components of SPS -II 2) At Chennivalasu for Zone-II

 Screen dia 3.5 m and area:
depth 5.0m The raw sewage collected from
 Grit dia 2.0 m and depth various lifting stations and
6.0m
 Suction well through gravity in SPS-II is
Dia 5.0 m and pumped to Main pumping
depth 7.6 m
 Non-clog Station– I of Zone-I area.
submersible pump New Sub- pumping
sets station is proposed in
the identified vacant
lands Govt.(Revenue lands),
for which necessary land
alienation action initiated.

4 MainPumping Collect sewage Main Pumping stations: 2 Main pumping

Stations (MPS) from lift stations Nos. stations are proposed to lift the
and SPS, Sewage collected by gravity,
pumpto STP from Lifting stations and SPS are
pumped to STP. Sub Pumping

30
 stations are proposed at
following locations:

a) MPS-I Components of MPS -I 1) At Ayyarkulam for Zone-I

 Screen dia 5.0 m and area:
depth 6.0m The raw sewage from MPS-I is
 Grit dia 3.50 m and depth pumped to STP at
7.0m
 Suction well panikampalayam
Dia 6.50 m and
depth 8.5 m
 Non-clog
submersible pump
sets
b) SPS-II Components of MPS -II 2) At Panikampalayam for
 Screen dia 2.0 m and Zone-IV area:
depth 5.0m The raw sewage collected from v
 Grit dia 2.0 m and depth lifting stations and through
6.0m
 Suction well gravity in MPS-II is pumped to
Dia 2.0 m and STP at panikampalayam. MPS-II
depth 7.5 m
 Non-clog is located within the STP site.
submersible pump
sets
5 House Collect sewage 5700Nos (Domestic& Provision has beengiven from
service from individual commercial) propertyboundary to
connections houses nearestmanhole.
andconvey into
network

6 Sewage Treat the sewage 3.14 MLD capacity

Treatment and dispose the Components of STP and its size:
Plant treated water
with standards Components Size
Receiving Chamber 2.0 m x 2.0m x 2.5 m
Coarse Screen Chamber 2.6 mx 0.5x 0.45m
Fine Screen Chamber 3.2m x 0.5m x 0.45m
Grit Chamber 3.5m x 3.5m x 0.75m
Flow Measuring Channel 5.0m x 0.45m x 0.45m
Oil & Grease Tank 14.0m x 4.0m x 3.0m
Collection well 16.0m dia x 5.0m
Distribution Chamber 3.0m x 2.0m x 1.5m
Fluidized Aerobic Bio 12.0m x 12.0m x 4.0m
(FAb) Reactor

31
 Secondary Clarifier 12.0m dia x 3.0m
Chlorine Contact Tank 9.0m x 3.0m x 2.7m
Sludge Sump 1.6m dia x 4.0m
Sludge Thickener 3.5m dia x 3.5m
Centifuge House 6.0m x 5.0m
Blower Room 8.0m x 5.0m x 5.3 m

2.3 Sewage Treatment Plant

The sewage treatment plant covers an area of 1.25 Acres. The STP with FAB
Technology has a capacity of 3.14 MLD. The Google view of layout of STP is shown
in Figure 2.4. The Layout of STP is shown in Figure 2.5. The Figure 2.6 shows the
STP Process flow diagram

Figure 2-4Google View of STP Site at Panikampalayam

32
Figure 0.5 - STP Layout

33
 Figure 0.6 - STP Flow Diagram
2.4 Process Description

Sewage is collected from all the sources in the receiving chamber. The sewage is
sent through a series of bar screens. Materials which are greater than 20 mm in size
are removed from the sewage. Screening prevents the clogging of pumps and
pipelines.

First, the sewage is sent through the coarse screen chamber / mechanical coarse
screen chambers. Here materials greater than 20 mm & 15 mm are removed
respectively. Then the sewage is sent through operated / automatic fine screens to
remove materials sized 15 mm & 10 mm.

34
 From here the sewage is sent to the grit chamber where fine particles like sand are
removed through sedimentation. The sand being heavier than sewage settles down
and can be removed. From the grit chamber the sewage is sent to the parshall flume
chamber. Parshall flumes are used to check the flow in the plant. An electromagnetic
flow meter should be installed in the Parshall Flume. The Screened sewage is then
led to the distribution Chamber-I. The sewage from the distribution Chamber-I is
then led to two Nos. of aeration tank. Biological treatment takes place in the
aeration tank. Air is diffused through air blowers to oxidize organic matters. The
overflow from the aeration tank is sent to distribution chamber- II and then to two
Nos. of secondary clarifier. The underflow clarifier sludge is returned to the
distribution Chamber- I for mixing and the excess sludge from the secondary
clarifier is sent to the centrifuge for dewatering. Recirculation of the sludge will
takes place effectively. The digested sludge is then pumped into the centrifuge
through screw pump to separate the solids from the treated effluent. The drain out
from the Centrifuge is collected in the filtrate sludge sump which is then sent back to
the distribution chamber-I through filtrate pump.

The overflow from the secondary clarifier is sent to distribution Chamber- III and to
Chlorine Contact tank where Chlorine is dozed. The treated effluent from the
Chlorine contact tank is led to the kuttai.

A 20 kVA DG will be provided as a standby source of power.

2.4.1 Sewage Receiver

The Raw Sewage will be collected through pipe lines into a receiving chamber
from where it will be taken into downstream screens. The function of the
receiving chamber is to reduce the incoming velocity. A Receiving chamber shall
be of adequate size to meet the requirements of workability inside it. The flow
from the receiving chamber will lead to screen Chamber.

35
2.4.2 Primary Treatment

In primary treatment, a portion of the suspended solids and organic matter is

removed from the wastewater. The liquid effluent from primary treatment, often
contains a large amount of suspended organic materials, and has a high BOD
(about 60% of original). Sometimes, the preliminary as well as primary
treatments are classified together, under primary treatment.

The organic solids, which are separated out in the sedimentation tanks in the
primary treatment, are often stabilized by anaerobic decomposition in a
digestion tank or incinerated. The residue is used for landfills or as a soil
conditioner. The principal function of primary treatment is to act as a precursor
to secondary treatment.

2.4.3 Fine Screening

Fine screens are to be provided for the removal of fine floating material coming
with the sewage. One is mechanically operated and the other screen is provided
as standby. The fine screens should be capable to screen out most of the medium
& fine floating and material such as hair, debris, weeds, paper, rags etc. which
could clog the downstream units. The Fine screen shall be inclined with bar
screen. It should be of sturdy design and the bar screen shall be of stainless steel
flats. The screenings shall be dropped on conveyor above the top of the screen
channel. A conveyor system of suitable width shall be provided which shall be
adjacent to the screens. The screening materials as collected will drop
automatically into a wheelbarrows for its disposal.

2.4.4 De-gritting

Screened sewage will be gravitable to minimum two numbers of Grit separator

tank for the removal of grit and small inorganic particulars matter of specific
gravity above 2.65 and particle size above 150 microns. One is mechanically
operated and the other is provided as standby. The Grit separator tank shall be

36
 of RCC construction complete with mechanical internals and square in size. The
grit separated shall be properly collected and be transferred for disposal. The
regretted sewage shall flow through open channels from the grit separators and
confluence into a single channel of suitable width.

2.4.5 Flow Measurement

A Flow measurement unit in the form of ultrasonic flow transmitter will have to
be provided in the Par shall Flume and at the outlet of treated effluent, to
measure the daily inlet & outfall of quantity.

2.4.6 Secondary Treatment Process

Screened, de-gritted sewage shall be fed into the Fluidized Bio Reactor
Treatment system to meet the treated effluent quality prescribed by TNPCB. The
outflow from the aeration tank will have 92% BOD reduction. The outlet of
Secondary Clarifier will have 40% BOD reduction. Any problem in aeration tank
will be due to diffusers provided in the tank. This can be rectified by lifting the
diffusers and manually cleaning the blockages. If the blower has any problem, a
standby blower is also provided in aeration tank. A part of the sludge from
secondary clarifier will be returned back to the aeration tank, to maintain the
MLSS concentration. For effective performance of the return sludge system, a
stand by pump is essential. The cost should be included in the estimate.

2.4.7 Tertiary Treatment

Tertiary treatment is used to further purify the water contaminants, especially

pathogens. The level of tertiary treatment performed depends on the quality of
effluent desired. This is determined by the size of the receiving body of water,
and the intended use of that water.

2.4.8 Chlorination

This is the most widely practiced means of disinfecting water. The strong
oxidizing capacity of chlorine destroys or inhibits the growth of pathogens,
reduces the BOD, reduces odour, water color and oxidizes metal ions.The
37
 chlorinators and tonners shall be housed in a separate building to be located
adjacent to mixing tank / contact tank with separate room for chlorinators and
tonners.

2.4.9 Sludge Handling System

As there is no primary clarifier, only the digested sludge will be separated out in
the secondary clarifiers through centrifuge house where the sludge is
dewatered.

The dewatered sludge quantity generated will be around 0.96 tons/ day, and it
will be used as manure for raising fodder crops and balance quantity if any will
be disposed off from the STP site to the nearby municipal compost yard. The
filtrate from the centrifuge is again taken to the aeration tank through
distribution Chamber-I for effective treatment. For proper dewatering of the
sludge, a stand by centrifuge feed pump should be provided and the cost should
be included in the Estimate.

The grit and waste from the screens and sludge will be used for fodder
cultivation and remaining to Perundurai town Dumping Yard at regular
intervals.

Table 2.2: Quality of incoming sewage and treated effluent from STP
Sl.N Parameters Unit Quality of Quality of TNPCB
o incoming Treated Discharge
Sewage effluent from Standards
STP

1 pH 7.61 8.00 5.5-9.0

2 Total Suspended Solids mg/l 105 20 30

mg/l
3 Total Dissolved Solids 1250 1050 2100

mg/l
4 Chlorides (Cl) 295 100 1000

38
 mg/l
5 Oil and Grease 12 6 10

mg/l
6 BOD at 20O C for 5 days 180 12 20

mg/l
7 COD 240 100 250

2.4.10 Disposal of Treated Sewage

The treated sewage is disposed through 600mm dia RCCpipe to nearby

Kuttai at 50 m from the STP which over flows and flows through gravity toodai
and reaches Chennimalaipalayam lake. The sewage will be treated in such a way
that can be used for irrigation purposes. The permission for disposal of treated
sewage is enclosed as Annexure-III

2.4.11 Future Expansion

The functional design of STP has been designed for the intermediate quantity of
3.14 MLD. On account of expansion an additional units would be installed to
meet the ultimate stage quantity. The existing land area is sufficient for the
future expansion.

2.4.12 Gardening, Landscaping and Tree Plantation

All along the periphery of the STP premises suitable species high rise trees shall
be planted creating a buffer zone of 3.0 m wide such that there will be no odour
nuisance in surrounding areas and improve aesthetics of the area. Also all along
the shoulder of proposed roads, decorative plants shall be plated. All the open
spaced around the buildings and process structures shall be provided with grass
turfing.

2.5 Design Considerations

 All the Primary Treatment Units have been designed for ultimate capacity of
STP (4.26 MLD). In secondary Treatment Units, the Aeration tank-2Nos and
39
 the Secondary Clarifier-2Nos are designed for 3.14 MLD (Intermediate
quantity).

 The STP technology to be adopted is Fluidized Aerobic Bio Reactor. No

primary sludge generation is involved.

 Compound wall of 1.8m height is proposed around the STP to protect the
STP.

 Independent access through SS (Stainless Steel) ladders and connected

access through walkway to all units are to be provided.

 Handrails in Stainless Steel are provided on both sides of walkway for safety
of the officials during Operation of the STP.

 Suitable capacity of Generator is provided to operate during power failure.

 Inner access road of 3.75m width for 660m length is to be provided to

facilitate all season access to the STP components by men and motor
vehicles.

 Lab facilities is provided in the STP site for monitoring the Treated water and
also TNPCB will monitor the treated water monthly twice and submit the
report.

 In STP Administrative Building is provided in STP site in which sanitary

facilities and drinking water facilities are provided.

40
 2.6 Land Details

Components
(Pumping Land
Available Required
Sl. Station, Lift Classificatio Current Acquisition /Transfer/
Location Extent Extent
No Stations, Lift n& Land use Alienation Status
(in Acres) (in Acres)
manholes, Ownership
STP)
Vacant,
0.05 Site Handed over to
1 Lift station-1 Thoppupalayam 0.05 Acre proposed
Acre TWAD Board
UGSS
Vacant,
0.05 0.05 Site Handed over to
2 Lift station-2 Beerangi medu proposed
Acre Acre TWAD Board
UGSS
Vacant,
0.05 0.05 Site Handed over to
3 Lift station-3 Ashok Nagar proposed
Acre Acre TOWN TWAD Board
UGSS
Panchayat
Vacant,
Periyavettuvapal 0.05 0.05 land Site Handed over to
4 Lift station-4 proposed
ayam Acre Acre TWAD Board
UGSS
Vacant,
Panickampalaya 0.05 0.05 Site Handed over to
5 Lift station-5 proposed
m Acre Acre TWAD Board
UGSS
Vacant,
0.05 0.05 Site Handed over to
6 Lift station-6 Kuyavankuttai proposed
Acre Acre TWAD Board
UGSS
State Vacant,
Chinnavettuvapa
7 SPS-I 0.2 Acre 0.1 Acre highways proposed To be applied
layam
Land UGSS
Govt Vacant,
Land Alienation
8 SPS-II Chennivalasu 0.5 Acre 0.2 Acre (Revenue proposed
applied
land) UGSS
9 MPS-I Iyyarkulam 0.5 Acre 0.5 Acre Govt Vacant, Land alienationation

41
 (Revenue proposed applied and got
land) UGSS approved. Site Handed
over to TWAD Board
Dumping
Town
Panickampalaya yard, Site Handed over to
10 MPS-II 0.25 acre 0.25 acre Panchayat
m proposed TWAD Board
Own Land
UGSS
Dumping
Town
Panickampalaya yard, Site Handed over to
11 STP 2.5 acre 1.25acre Panchayat
m proposed TWAD Board
Own Land
UGSS

42
 3 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

3.1 Introduction

This section reviews the policies, regulations and administrative framework within
which the project works are to be implemented. The review includes the
Environmental, Climate Change and Social Management Framework (ECSMF)
developed by TNUIFSL, Operational policies / directives of Funding Agencies
through TNUIFSL, sector-specific Environmental Policies &Regulations of the
Government of India and the institutional profile of various agencies such as Tamil
Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) and other stakeholders associated with the
project.

3.2 Environmental Legislations

Salient features of some of the major laws that are applicable are given below;

3.2.1 Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

The basic objective of this Act is to maintain and restore the wholesomeness of
the country's aquatic resources by prevention and control of pollution.
Consequently, the Water Act, a Central law, was enacted under Article 252(1) of
the Constitution, which empowers the Union Government to legislate in a field
reserved for the States. All the States have approved implementation of the
Water Act. As during operation, it is likely that the ground water quality and
surface water quality may be altered. Therefore this act is applicable to the
proposed project.

3.2.2 Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981

The Union Government under Article 253 of the Constitution passed this Statute.
This Act provides for the prevention, control and abatement of air pollution and
confers powers to the Central and State Pollution Control Board with a view to
carry out the aforesaid purposes. This act is applicable to the proposed project.

43
3.2.3 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

The Union Government under Article 253 of the Constitution passed this Statute.
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 seeks to achieve the objective of
protection and improvement of environment and for matters connected
therewith. This legislation enables the co-ordination of activities of the various
regulatory agencies; setting up of an authority or authorities with advocate
powers for environmental protection etc., This Act is applicable to the proposed
project.

Objective of this Act is to provide the protection and improvement of

environment (which includes water, air, land, human being, other living
creatures, plants, microorganism and properties) and for matters connected
therewith.

3.2.4 Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991

The Act provides public liability insurance for the purpose of providing
immediate relief to the persons affected by accident occurring while handling
hazardous substances. A Hazardous substance means any substance or
preparation which is defined as hazardous substance under the Environment
(Protection) Act 1986, and exceeding such quantity as may be specified by
notification by the Central Government.

3.2.5 Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016

The SWM Rules, 2016 contain two schedules prescribing the details as
mentioned further. These schedules should be referred for complying with the
specifications and the standards prescribed therein.

Schedule – I : Specifications for Sanitary Landfills

Schedule – II : Standards for Processing and Treatment of Solid Waste

Schedule No. Sections Details Prescribed

A. Criteria for site selection
Schedule – I
Criteria for development of facilities at
Specifications B.
the sanitary landfills

44
 for Sanitary Criteria for specifications for land-filling
Landfills C. operations and closure on completion of
land filling
D. Criteria for pollution prevention
E. Criteria for water quality monitoring
F.
Criteria for ambient air quality monitoring
G. Criteria for plantation at landfill site
H. Criteria for post care of landfill site
I. Criteria for special provisions for hilly areas
J. Closure and rehabilitation of old dumps
Schedule – II A. Standards for composting
Standards for B. Standards for treated leachates
Processing and
Treatment of Solid C. Standards for incineration
Waste

3.2.6 The Noise Pollution (Regulation And Control) Rules, 2000

The Union Government has laid down statutory norms to regulate and control
noise levels to prevent their adverse effects on human health and the
psychological well being of the people. Under the new regulation, different areas
and zones are to be identified as industrial, commercial, and residential or
silence areas and anyone exceeding the specified noise level would be liable for
action. In industrial areas, the noise level limit during the day time (6 am to 10
pm) is 75 decibels and during night (10 pm to 6 am) 70 decibels.

Similarly, for commercial areas day time limit is 65 decibels and night limit is 55
decibels. In the case of residential areas, the limits are respectively 55 decibels
and 45 decibels and for the silence zones, 50 and 40 decibels.

3.3 World Bank Policies

Following are the Operation Policy & Directorate of the World Bank.

3.3.1 Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01

This requires the borrower to screen projects upstream in the project cycle for
potential impacts. Thereafter, an appropriate EA approach to assess, minimize /

45
 enhance and mitigate potentially adverse impacts is selected depending on
nature and scale of project. The EA needs to be integrated in the project
development process such that timely measures can be applied to address
identified impacts. The policy requires consultation with affected groups and
NGO’s to recognize community concerns and the need to address the same as
part of EA. For this project, there is no objection from the public.

3.3.2 Cultural Property - OP 11.03

Requirements - World Bank’s Operational Policy Note 11.03 which aims at

preserving and avoiding the elimination of structures having archaeological
(prehistoric), paleontological, historical, religious and unique natural values.
Projects that could significantly damage non-replicable cultural properties are
declined for funding and the Bank will in turn assist protection and
enhancement of cultural properties encountered in the project rather than
leaving that protection to chance. The project does not attract this Policy.

3.3.3 Natural Habitats – OP/BP 4.04

This policy sets out the World Bank’s policy on supporting and emphasizing the
precautionary approach to natural resource management and ensuring
opportunities for environmentally sustainable development. As per this policy,
projects that involve significant conversion or degradation of critical natural
habitats are not supported by the Bank. The project does not attract this Policy.

3.3.4 Forests – OP/BP 4.36

This sets out specific policy on protection of forests through consideration of

forest related impacts of all investment operations, ensuring restrictions for
operations affecting critical forest conservation areas, and improving
commercial forest practice through use of modern certification systems. The
policy requires consultation with local people, the private sector and other
stakeholders in forest area. The project does not attract this Policy.

46
3.3.5 Pest Management - OP 4.09

This policy supports environmentally sound pest management, including

integrated pest management, but does not prohibit the use of highly hazardous
pesticides. Pest Management is the borrower’s responsibility in the context of a
project’s EA. The same will be taken care during the operation of the system.

3.3.6 Involuntary Resettlement - OP/BP 4.12

This policy is implemented in projects which displace people. It requires public

participation in resettlement planning as part of EA for projects. It is intended to
restore or improve income earning capacity of displaced populations. The
project does not attract this Policy.

3.3.7 Indigenous Peoples – OP/BP 4.20

The purpose of this policy is to ensure indigenous people benefit from Bank
financed developed and to avoid or mitigate adverse affects on indigenous
people. It applies to projects that might adversely affect indigenous peoples or
when they are targeted beneficiaries. Requires participation of indigenous
people in creation of “indigenous people development plans”. The project does
not attract this Policy.

3.3.8 Sustainabilty Guidelines

This policy includes:

• a preliminary appraisal, called screening, to determine the environmental,

social and climate relevance and environmental, social and climate risks of a FC
measure; and, if the relevance is affirmed

• the definition of the scope (scoping) to identify and assess the FC

measure's environmental, social and climate-relevant impacts and risks more
accurately, including potential to protect the climate and increase the adaptive
capacities of the target group in close cooperation with the executing agency

47
 • The design and implementation of an ESDD, in-depth climate adaptation
assessment and/or in-depth climate mitigation assessment in order to examine
all or individual aspects of the FC measure, including participatory approaches
to involve affected local groups and keep the public in the partner country
informed.

The Sustainability Guideline of KfW describes principles and procedures to

assess the environmental, social and climate impacts during the preparation of
measures financed by KfW. According to the guidelines, all funding activities of
KfW must be subject to an ESIA and a climate change assessment as defined in
this guideline. SG of the KfW has been adequately considered while updating the
ESF into ECSMF to include the climate chage perspective with a view to ensuring
climate resilience and mitigation measures during planning and implementation
of urban infrastructure projects

3.4 Legal/Regulatory Clearances For The Project

The following are the list of approvals required for the implementation of
proposed project.

3.4.1 Clearances/ NOC Required from Competent Authority

The summary of applicable Clearance / NOC required for the proposed project is
given in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 - Clearances/ NOC Required from Competent Authority

S.NO Activity Clearance / NOC Statutory Status
Required Authority
1 Land for Proposed No objection certificate Town Permission obtained
STP Panchayat own
Land
2 Establishment of Consent To TNPCB Permission obtained
Proposed STP Establishment under Air
and Water Act
3 Operation of STP Consent To Operate TNPCB Permission will be
under Air and Water obtained before
Act operation of STP

48
5 Sewer line and No objection certificate Highways Permission will be
Pumping main Authority obtained prior to
crossing and laying execution
near local roads and
Highways
Disposal of Treated No objection certificate Local Authority Permission obtained
6
Sewage
Labour welfare
7 Working of labour License Permission obtained
board

49
 EIA/EMP Report

4 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS

4.1 Preamble

This chapter depicts the establishment of baseline for valued environmental

components, as identified in project town ofPerundurai, Erode district, Tamil Nadu .The
primary baseline data monitored covering three (3) months i.e(April-June 2017), and
secondary data was collected from Government and Semi-Government organizations.
The primary baseline data has been generated by M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P)
Ltd, Chennai, and a MoEF&CC approved Environmental Testing Laboratory for the
following Terrestrial environmental components.
 Meteorology: Temperature, Relative Humidity, Rainfall, Wind Speed &
Direction-
 Ambient Air Quality: Particulate matter <10 micron size (PM10), Particulate
matter <2.5 micron size (PM2.5), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2),
Carbon Monoxide (CO), Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3),Benzene (C6H6), Benzo (a) pyrene
(C20H12), Arsenic (As), Nickel (Ni)& Ammonia (NH3), -
 Ambient Noise Levels: Day equivalent noise levels, Night equivalent noise levels
-
 Inland Water Quality: Groundwater Quality, Surface Water Quality
 Soil Quality
 Ecological Environment
 Socio economic Status

4.2 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive Areas

The details of environmentally/ecologically sensitive areas covering within 15

km from project boundary are given in Table 0-2 and Figure 4-2.
 EIA/EMP Report

Table-4.1 -Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary

S.No Areas Proposed project location boundary

1 Areas protected under Vellode Bird Sanctuary≈5.7 Km towards ESE

international conventions, national
or local legislation for their
ecological, landscape, cultural or
other related value
2 Areas which are important or Noyyal River ≈14.98 Km towards SSE
sensitive for ecological reasons –
Wetlands, Watercourses or other
water bodies, coastal zone,
biospheres, mountains, forests
3 Areas used by protected, important Vellode Bird Sanctuary≈5.7 Km towards ESE
or sensitive species of flora or
fauna for breeding, nesting,
foraging, resting, over wintering,
migration
4 Inland, coastal, marine or Nil
underground waters
5 State, National boundaries Nil
6 Routes or facilities used by the Chennimalai Lord Murugan Temple≈11.23Km
public for access to recreation or towards S
other tourist, pilgrim areas
7 Defence installations Nil
8 Densely populated or built-up area Perundurai Town ≈1.6Km towards NW
(Nearest Town,City,District)

51
 EIA/EMP Report

9 Areas occupied by sensitive man- Schools & Colleges

made land uses (hospitals, schools, S. No Schools & Distance Direction
places of worship, community Colleges (~km)

facilities) 1. Sri Durga 3.06 SSW

matriculation
higher
school
2. Kongu 1.55 NE
Polytechnic
college
3. Kongu Velalar 6.69 WNW
Polytechnic
College
4. Kongu 1.93 NE
Engineering
College
5. M.P 8.88 SSE
Nachimuthuu
M.Jaganathan
Engineering
College
6. Maharaja 2.95 NE
college for
women
7. Nandha 4.04 NE
Engineering
College
8. National 5.68 NW
Management
College
9. Palaniswamy 2.9 NNE
College of Art
10. Perundurai 3.65 NW
medical college
11. Vidhya 5.44 SSW
Mandhir
Institute of
Technology

52
 EIA/EMP Report

Religious places
12. Chennimalai 11.23 S
Lord Murugan
Temple
Hospitals
13. Shree Shanti 2.04 NNW
Hospital
14. MNP Nursing 3.17 NW
Home
Tourist places
15. Vellode Bird 6.08 E
Sanctuary
Others
16. SIDCO 4.36 WSW
17. Perundurai 3.89 E
Railway Station
10 Areas containing important, high Nil
quality or scarce resources,
(groundwater resources, surface
resources, forestry, agriculture,
fisheries, tourism, minerals)
11 Areas already subjected to No Notified/Recognized polluted area within
pollution or environmental 15Km distance.
damage (those where existing legal
environmental standards are
exceeded)
12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard This area is generally plain not prone to any
which could cause the project to natural disasters. The study area falls under
present environmental problems, Zone-II, according to the Indian Standard Seismic
(earthquakes, subsidence, Zoning Map.
landslides, erosion or extreme or
adverse climatic conditions)

Study Area
A 10Km radial distance with the proposed project site as the epicenter has been
identified as the General study area for assessing the baseline environmental status. The

53
 EIA/EMP Report

core study area is the project area and its immediate surroundings to the tune of 1.0 Km
radius from the boundary. Further the Project Impact/Influence Area (PIA) is 10Km
from the boundary of the core area covering Perundurai Town, Erode district, Tamil
Nadu.

54
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-1Map showing the Satellite Image of the study area

 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-2Environmental sensitive areas covering within 15 km from project boundary

 EIA/EMP Report

4.3 Physical Conditions

In this section, the physical conditions of PIA district are discussed in general and
wherever possible references to the conditions prevailing in the study area in particular
are also provided. The physical conditions are discussed as under:
 District profile
 Drainage, land use, geology, Physiography
 Natural resources
 Climatic conditions, seismic zone characteristics and natural hazard

4.3.1 PIA District Profile

The district lies between 10°36'and 11°58'degrees of northern latitude and between
76°49' and 77°58' Degrees of the Eastern Longitude. It has an area of 5,722.64 sq.kms
and is bounded by Karnataka State in the North, Udhagamandalam District in the North
West, Coimbatore, Tirupur District in the West, Tirupur District in the South, Karur
District in the South East and Namakkal, Salem districts in the East.
Source :http://dcmsme.gov.in/dips/2016-17/DIP.ERODE.2015.16.pdf

4.3.2 Climatic Conditions

The western part of the Erode district enjoys a salubrious climate because of the hilly
region, whereas the central and eastern parts of the district are hot and humid. The
cooler and pleasant climate prevails in the hilly regions. The weather is extremely
pleasant during the period from November to February both in the plains and on the
hills. Mornings in general are more humid than the afternoons. The relative humidity
varies from 65 to 87 percent during the northeast monsoon period between October
and November. The hot weather begins early in March, the highest temperature being
reached in April and May. Highest temperatures are recorded during the months of
April and May with temperatures reaching 40°C. The weather in the plains during the
summer i.e., from April to June is generally dry and hot. Weather cools down
progressively from about the middle of June and by December. The night temperatures
are the lowest in the hills.
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/TamilNadu/Erode.pdf
 EIA/EMP Report

4.3.3 Natural resources of Erode district

4.3.3.1 Forest Resources

In terms of natural resources such as forests, rivers, climate soil and minerals the
district is fairly endowed. The forest occupies over 29% of the total area in the district.
The district has a total forest area of 2.43 lakhs hectares, with Sathyamangalam and
Bhavani taluks together accounting for as much as 94% ofthis area. Sathy taluk alone
accounts for 61% of the forest area in the district. Sathy, Thalamali, Burgur and
Anthiyur are the 4 forest ranges earning under Divisional Forest Office, Erode. The
important forest products are sandalwood, rosewood, timber, teak, bamboo, firewood,
charcoal, tamarind and herbs. There is still vast scope for tapping the forest potential.
Source:http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/102430/10/10_chapter%203
.pdf

4.3.3.2 Irrigation

Canals are the major source of water for irrigation in the district, accounting for about
57.00 percent of the total area irrigated in the district. Dug wells, and bore wells are
accounting for about 32.55 and 9.09 percent of the total area irrigated respectively.
Other sources and tanks accounting for about 1.21, and 0.14 percent respectively. It is
observed that the well irrigation is the highest in Dharapuram block followed by block
Andhiyur.
Source:http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/TamilNadu/Erode.pdf
S.No Irrigation by Difference Sources Areas in Ha
1. Dug wells 52474
2. Tube wells/ Bore wells 14659
3. Tanks/Ponds 228
4. Canals 91904
5. Other Sources 1952
Net irrigated area 161217
Cross irrigated area 184904

58
 EIA/EMP Report

4.3.3.3 Agricultural Resources

Agriculture is a major occupation of the district. According to recent agriculture census,

the number of operational land holdings was 3,26,499 covering an area of 505615.74
hectare, out of which net area sown is 283727 hectares and an area of 26486 hectares is
sown more than once. Paddy is grown extensively as an irrigated crop in Erode, Gobi
and Dharapuram taluks. Cholam is widely grown as an irrigated crop in Dharapuram
and Erode taluks. Cotton, Groundnut, Gingelly and Turmeric are also grown exclusively
in this district. District is famous for Turmeric cultivation and on an average the
Turmeric crop is raised in an area of 5500 hectares. Banana is also grown in 3000
hectares annually.
Source:
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/102430/10/10_chapter%203.pdf

4.3.3.4 Mineral Resources

Major minerals quarts and Feldspar are occurring in this district mainly in Perundurai
Taluk. Quarts available here is of good quality and is used in electronic industry and the
Feldspar is consumed by the ceramic industry.
Black Granites are occurring in Thalavadi, Mallanguli, Thingalur in Sathyamangalam
Taluk and in Bargur and Nerinjipettai areas of Bhavani Taluk. Black Granite available is
medium black in colour with green background and white spots. Multi Colour Granites
are found in Mallanguli, Alambadi, Sivanmalai areas. Rough stone for construction are
available in all the taluks in particular rough stone quarries and stone crushers have
been established in Ammapettai, Bhavanisagar areas. Sand deposits are available in
Bhavaniand Cauveri river beds. Sand leases had been granted in Bhavani and Cauveri
river beds.
Source: http://dcmsme.gov.in/dips/2016-17/DIP.ERODE.2015.16.pdf

59
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-3 Mineral Map of Tamil Nadu

4.3.4 Land Use & Land Cover

The total geographical area of the district is 572,264 hectares. Of theose 199,389
hectares have been brought under cultivation as net area sown. This accounts for34.8%
of the total area of the district. Area sown more than once is 25,397 hectares i.e. 12.73%
of the total net area sown. Total cropped area is 224,786 hectares i.e. 39.2% of the total
area in the district. Forests account for 227,511 hectares i.e. 39% of the total area.
Cultivable waste has been reduced to mere 1707 hectares in the district. Less than 9.2%
of the total area is put to non-agricultural use (53,004 hectares). However, 14.5% is
accounted for by fallow lands (83,368 hectares). Trees, crops, groves, Orchards etc.
together account for about 0.6% of the total area in the district. Of the 199,389 hectares

60
 EIA/EMP Report

brought under cultivation, 25397 hectares are sown more than once, thus enhancing the
total area cropped to 224,786 hectares. If this is taken into account, the percentage of
total cropped area to total area of the district will work out to 39.2% thus publishing
better utilization of available land resources in the District .Details of district land
use/land cover statistics for Erode district given in Table 4-3 and Land Use map of
Erode District is given in Figure 4-4. Land Use pattern of Erode District is given in
Figure 4-5.
Table 4-3 District land use/land cover statistics for Erode District
S.No Area in Area in Area in Area
Division of Land Use/Land Cover
Sq.Km Hectare Acres in %
1. Forest, Evergreen/Semi-evergreen 1133.85 113385 280180 13.89
2. Agriculture, Plantation 342.27 34227 84576.63 4.19
3. Barren/uncultivable/ Wastelands,
193.85 19385 47901.3 2.37
Scrub land
4. Grass/Grazing 136.53 13653 33737.25 1.67
5. Builtup,Urban 112.66 11266 27838.85 1.38
6. Wetlands/Water Bodies,
71.97 7197 17784.15 0.88
River/Stream/canals
7. Builtup,Mining 14.58 1458 3602.791 0.18
8. Barren/uncultivable/ Wastelands,
8.42 842 2080.624 0.10
Barren rocky
9. Forest, Forest Plantation 3.17 317 783.3229 0.039
10. Agriculture, Crop land 3864.55 386455 954949.6 47.33
11 Agriculture, Fallow 839.71 83971 207496.5 10.28
12. Forest, Deciduous 719.81 71981 177868.7 8.82
13. Forest, scrub forest 413.81 41381 102254.5 5.068
14. Builtup,Rural 207.98 20798 51392.9 2.55
15. Wetlands/Water Bodies,
97.82 9782 24171.81 1.20
Reservoir/Lakes/Ponds
16. Barren/uncultivable/ Wastelands,
3.42 342 845.0991 0.042
Salt Affected land

61
 EIA/EMP Report

17. Wetlands/Water Bodies, Inland

0.58 58 143.3209 0.007
Wetland
18. Barren/uncultivable/ Wastelands,
0.03 3 7.41315 0.0004
Sandy area
Total 8165.01 816501 2017614.8 100.0

Figure 4-4 Land Use Map of Erode District

62
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-5Land
Land Use/ land cover Pattern of PIA district

4.3.5 Topography

Erode District lies 171.91 meters above mean sea level. The soil of the District is
predominantly red sandy to red gravelly type in the taluks of Bhavani, Erode, and
Perundurai. Red loamy soil occurs at the bottom of the valleys in the taluks of
Gobichettipalayam
palayam and Sathyamanagalam. Physical map ofErode is given in Figure 4-6.
Source: http://dcmsme.gov.in/dips/2016
tp://dcmsme.gov.in/dips/2016-17/DIP.ERODE.2015.16.pdf
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-6 Physical map of Tamil Nadu

64
 EIA/EMP Report

4.3.6 Geology of PIA District

Erode district of Tamil Nadu falls in the south of Palaghat-Cauvery shear zone. The
Geophysical Mapping was taken up to delineate the chromitite bands within the
ultramafic sequence. The study indicate a gravity high zone in the central part of the
toposheet-58F/14 with magnetic bipolar anomalies, correlated to charnockite group of
rocks and a gravity low with sparse magnetic variations in the south-western part
around Kolapalli suggesting anorthosite body.
Source:https://www.gsi.gov.in/webcenter/ShowProperty;jsessionid=0Z55efYJ_BESqyoTU
VmGW1xLxCw-v2tcVblEs3RAfnoIcg8zvPf2!-107032927!-
68022989?nodeId=%2FUCM%2FDCPORT1GSIGOVI063287%2F%2FidcPrimaryFile&revisi
on=latestreleased

4.3.7 Geomorphology of PIA District

The Erode district forms part of the uplands of the state. Physiographically the district
can be divided into hilly area, the upland area and plains area. The prominent
geomorphic units identified in the district through interpretation of Satellite imagery
are 1) Structural hills, 2) Inselberg, 3) Ridges, 4) Valley fill, 5) Pediments, 6) Shallow
Pediments.
The hilly area is represented by the Western Ghats in the northwestern part of the
district, the Biligiri Rangan hills in the north, Bodamalai Betta hills in the northwestern
parts and Konbattarayan hills in the north central part of the district. Konbattarayan hill
(1699 m above MSL) is the highest peak in the district while Moyar Gorge is a
picturesque gorge in the Western Ghats through which Moyar river traverses.
The Kongunadu uplands lie south of Bhavani River and the Lower Bhavani canal passes
through these uplands. Scattered hillocks and knolls of moderate elevations occur
within these uplands. The plains area is characterized by an undulating topography
with a general gradient due east and southeast. The plains are limited to the east and
southwestern border of the district. The plains west of Cauvery river are known as
Lower Cauvery plains.
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/TamilNadu/Erode.pdf
 EIA/EMP Report

4.3.8 Hydrogeology of PIA District

Erode district is underlain entirely by Archaean Crystalline formations with Recent

alluvial deposits occurring along the river and streams courses and colluvium of valley-
fills. The important aquifer systems in the district are constituted by weathered,
fissured and fractured crystalline rocks and the recent alluvial deposits. The porous
formations in the district are represented by alluvium and colluvium. The alluvial
deposits are confined to the major river and stream courses only. Ground water occurs
under phreatic conditions. The maximum saturated thickness of these aquifers is upto 5
m depending upon the topographic conditions. The area lying at the foot hill zones
which are seen in the northern parts of the district is underlain by the colluvial material
derived from the nearby hill ranges comprising sands and gravels. The maximum
saturated thickness of these aquifers is upto 20 m depending upon the topographic
conditions. Ground water occurs under phreatic conditions.Hydrogeology map of PIA
district is shown in Figure 4-7.
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/TamilNadu/Erode.pdf

66
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-7Hydrogeology Map of PIA district

 EIA/EMP Report

4.3.9 Drainage Pattern in PIA District

The river Cauvery flows along the eastern border of the district. Most of the rivers and
streams drained the district form the tributaries to the Cauvery river. The Bhavani river,
which has its origin in the Silent Valley range of Kerala State, enters the district about 30
km west of Bhavanisagar and flows more or less in an easterly direction and
confluences with the river Cauvery at Bhavani town. Moyar river is a major tributary of
the river Bhavani. The river Bhavani is tamed by a reservoir namely the Bhavanisagar.
The Palar river originating in the south Bargur forest flows in north-easterly and
easterly directions. Maniyar Halla, Tatta Halla, Kathala Halla, Yemahatti Halla and
Dinnepattipaliam are the important minor tributaries of the Palar river. The Noyil River
draining the southern part of the district has its origin in the Boluvampatty valley of the
Vellingiri hills of Western Ghats enter the district flowing from Coimbatore district. The
Amaravathi river and its tributaries drain the southern part of the district. It has its
origin in Kerala state and passing through the adjoining districts, enters the district at
about 5 km south of Salempalayam. The major tributaries to Amaravathi river are the
Uppar Odai, Shanmukha Nadi, Nallathangal Odai and Vattamalakkarai. The important
streamlets flowing in the northern side are the Bale Halla and Anaikodu Halla, which
form tributaries to Suvaranavati river flowing into Karnataka.
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/TamilNadu/Erode.pdf

4.3.10 Soils in PIA District

The soils of Erode district can be broadly classified into 6 major soils types viz., Red
calcareous soil, Red non calcareous soil, Black Soil, Alluvial and Colluvial soils, Brown
soil and Forest soil. Major part of the district covered by red calcareous soils. They are
mostly sandy to loamy and characterized by the hard and compact layer of lime. The red
non-calcareous soils are seen in Erode, Perunthurai and Gopichettioalayam taluks. The
black soils are occurring as patches in four taluks. Brown soil occupies only a small
portion of Bhavani, Kangayam and Gopichettipalayam taluks. Alluvial soils are fund in
small patches along the Noyil and Bhavani rivers and the Colluvial soils are found in the
foothills of Western Ghats. The Soil Map of PIA District is given in Figure 4-8.
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/TamilNadu/Erode.pdf
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-8 Soil Map of PIA district

4.3.11 Seismicity

As per the IS:1893 (Part-1) 2002 of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), the project
location/study area falls in Zone II, which is categorised as a Least active (as per map)
zone. The seismicity map of India is shownin Figure 4-9.

69
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-9 Seismicity Map of India

Source:Maps of India

4.4 Air Environment

Baseline ambient air quality assessment gives the status in the vicinity of site and is an
indispensable part of environmental impact assessment studies. Significant changes, in
predominant winds and weather conditions are observed in winter, summer and post-
post
monsoon seasons apart from the local topographic influences. The baseline status of air
environment in the study area is assessed through a systematic air quality surveillance
programme.

4.4.1 Meteorological Conditions

The regional air quality is influenced by the meteorology of that region. The principal
weather parameters that influence the concentration of the air pollutants in the
surroundings are wind speed, wind direction and temperature. The meteorological data
is useful for proper interpretation of the baseline data. .
 EIA/EMP Report

4.4.2 Meteorological Data Collection

Available secondary data pertaining to the meteorological parameters was obtained

from the IMD Climatological tables. In addition, baseline meteorological data (primary
data) was generated during April – June 2017. The methodology adopted for
monitoring surface observations is as per the standard norms laid down by Bureau of
Indian Standards (BIS) i.e. IS:8829 and Indian Meteorological Department (IMD).

4.4.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data

The nearest Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) station located to project site is
Coimbatore (Pelamedu). The Climatological data for Coimbatore (Pelamedu) (11 02’ N
and 77o 03’ E), published by the IMD, based on daily observations at 08:30 and 17:30
hour IST for a 30 year period, is presented in the following sections on the
meteorological conditions of the region.The monthly variations of the relevant
meteorological parameters are reproduced inTable 4-1.
Table 4-1Climatological Summary –Coimbatore (Pelamedu) Region (1971-2000)
Predominant
Relative Station Level
Rainfall Wind
Temp (oC) Humidity Pressure Mean
(mm) Directions
(%) hPa Wind
Month (From)*
Speed
No.
Daily Daily (m/s)
Total of 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30
Max. Min.
days
Jan 30.5 18.2 5.4 0.3 81 41 20.6 16.1 1.92 NE E
Feb 33.3 19.5 13 1 76 34 21.2 15.5 2.14 NE E
Mar 35.9 21.3 15.1 1 73 29 23.2 15.2 2.25 NE E
Apr 36.7 23.4 48 3 75 42 26.7 21 2.50 SW SW
May 35.2 23.5 71.2 4.2 78 56 27.4 24.9 3.28 SW SW
Jun 32.2 22.4 27.4 2.7 80 66 26 24.8 4.53 SW SW
Jul 31.3 21.8 24.7 2.9 83 69 25.4 24.8 4.58 SW SW
Aug 31.6 21.8 35.5 2.6 83 68 25.4 25 4.58 SW SW
Sep 32.5 22 74.3 4.6 83 67 25.9 25.4 3.64 SW SW
Oct 31.6 21.8 123.1 7.4 83 67 25.8 24.8 2.39 SW SW
Nov 30.1 20.7 122.2 5.8 83 63 24.1 22.7 1.61 NE NE
Dec 29.3 19 46 2.8 82 55 21.8 19.5 1.72 NE E
Max. 36.7 23.5 123.1 7.4 83 69 27.4 25.4 4.58 Annual
Min. 29.3 18.2 5.4 0.3 73 34 20.6 15.2 1.61 Predominant

71
 EIA/EMP Report

Predominant
Relative Station Level
Rainfall Wind
Temp (oC) Humidity Pressure Mean
(mm) Directions
(%) hPa Wind
Month (From)*
Speed
No.
Daily Daily (m/s)
Total of 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30
Max. Min.
days
Avg/Total. 32.5 21.3 606 38.3 80 54.7 24.5 21.6 2.94 Wind Pattern
-South West

As per the above IMD Climatological data, the observations drawn are the following
 Daily maximum temperature is 36.70C and the daily minimum
temperature is 18.2 0C were recorded in the months of April and January
respectively
 Maximum and minimum relative humidity of 83% and 34% were
recorded in the months of July and Feb respectively.
 Maximum and minimum rainfall of 123.1 mm and 5.4 mm was recorded
in the months of October and January respectively. Annual total rainfall
recorded in the region was 606mm.
 Maximum and minimum Mean wind speed during the study period is 4.58
m/s and 1.61 m/s. was recorded in the months of July and November
respectively. Wind predominant pattern was observed during study
period is South West

4.4.4 Meteorological data during Study Period

The meteorological data of study period was used for interpretation of baseline status
and to simulate the meteorological conditions for prediction of impacts in modeling
studies. Meteorology Data for the Study Period of April-June 2017 is presented in
Table 4-2.

72
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-10 Wind Rose during April-June 2017.

Table 4-2 Meteorology Data for the Study Period (April-June 2017)
S. No Parameter Observation
1. Temperature Max. Temperature : 420C
Min. Temperature : 24.00C
Avg. Temperature : 32.60C
2. Average Relative Humidity 55%
3. Average Wind Speed 3.9m/s
4. Predominant Wind South to North
Direction

4.4.5 Atmospheric Inversion

Atmospheric inversion level at the project site was monitored; the results observed at
the site during the study period are as follows.
 Average atmospheric temperature 32.60C
 Average Relative humidity: 55 %

73
 EIA/EMP Report

 Average Wind speed: 3.9 m/s

The daily inversion level calculated based on the average temperature and average
wind speed at the project site and the maximum inversion height is derived by the
graph plotted based on the average temperature and average wind speed. The daily
inversion level at the project site varies from 50 to 1750m during 6 AM to 6 PM, the
maximum recorded at 5 PM, April-June 2017. This is shown in the following Figure
4-11

Figure 4-11Atmospheric inversion level at the project site

4.5 Baseline Environment

The primary baseline data of the project area was monitored during April-June 2017, by
M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd, Chennai. The results of the study are provided
below:

4.6 Ambient Air Quality

The selection criteria for monitoring locations are based on the following:
 Topography/Terrain
 Meteorological conditions
 Residential and sensitive areas within the study area
 Representatives of regional background air quality/pollution levels and
 Representation of likely impacted areas

Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations

To evaluate the baseline air quality of the study area, Eight (08) monitoring locations
have been identified as per April-June 2017. The wind predominance is from South to
North. Wind rose during the study period April - June 2017 is given in Figure 4-10

74
 EIA/EMP Report

which depicts the annual wind pattern. Map showing the AAQ monitoring locations is
given in and the details of the locations are given inTable 4-3.

Table 4-3 Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations

Location
S.No Location Distance in Km Direction
Code
Project Site
1 A1 Within site
Perundurai STP
2 Chennia Valasu A2 1.70 N
3 Vailkaalmedu A3 4.18 NE

4 kummakalipalayam A4 1.59 SSE

5 Muthu Nagar A5 1.98 SW

6 Periyavettupalayam A6 3.12 WSW

7 V.C.V.Nagar A7 0.97 NNW

8 Perundurai A8 2.00 NW

75
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-12 Map showing the Ambient Air Quality monitoring locations
 EIA/EMP Report

Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency

Ambient air quality was monitored twice in a week for One (01) season (shall cover 12
weeks), i.e. during Pre-Monsoon season (April-June 2017). PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, Pb,
O3NH3, C6H6, C20H12, As, &Ni were monitored for 24 hours and CO &O3was monitored for
8 hours. Sampling was carried out as per Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
monitoring guidelines at each location. Analytical methods used for analysis of
parameters are given in Table 4-4.
Table 4-4 Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters
(NAAQ)
Sampling
S. No Parameters Analytical method NAAQ standards: 2009
Time
Sulphur
IS 11255 (part 2)/ 80(24
1 Dioxide (SO2), 50 (Annual) 24 Hours
USEPA method 6 Hours)
μg/m3
Nitrogen
IS: 5182 (Part - 6): 80 (24
2 Dioxide (NO2), 40 (Annual) 24 Hours
2006 Hours)
μg/m3
Particulate In house
60 (24
3 Matter (PM2.5), method(Gravimetric 40 (Annual) 24 Hours
hours)
μg/m3 Method)
Particulate
IS:5182 (Part– 23): 100 (24
4 Matter (PM10), 60 (Annual) 24 Hours
2006 hours)
μg/m3
IS:5182(Part–
5 CO mg/m3 10):1999 2 (8 hours) 4 (1hour) 8 Hours
(Reaff:2006)
IS:5182(Part–
1(24
6 Pbμg/m3 22):2004 0.5(Annual) 24 Hours
hours)
(Reaff:2006)
In house method
180
7 O3, μg/m3 (Spectrophotometric 100(8hours) 8 Hours
(1hour)
Method)
 EIA/EMP Report

In house method
400(24
8 NH3, μg/m3 (Spectrophotometric 100(Annual) 24Hours
hours)
Method)
Benzene, GC FID/ GC MS Based
9 5 (Annual) 5 (Annual) 24 Hours
μg/m3 on IS 5182: part 11
In house validated
Method by
Benzo (a)
10 HPLC,UV&GC MS 1 (Annual) 1 (Annual) 24 Hours
pyrene, ng/m3
Based on IS 5182:
part 12
In house method (AAS
Method) Based on
11 Arsenic, ng/ m3 6 (Annual) 6 (Annual) 24 Hours
CPCB guidelines
Volume 1.
In house method (AAS
Method) Based on 20
12 Nickel, ng/ m3 20 (Annual) 24 Hours
CPCB guidelines (Annual)
Volume 1.

4.6.3 Results and Discussions

The variations of the pollutants PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, CO, Pb, O3, NH3, C6H6, C20 H12, As &
Ni are compared with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), MoEF&CC
Notification, November 2009. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data (April –June 2017)
for the study area is given in Table 4-5 and trends of measured ambient concentration
in the study area were graphically represented in Figure 4-13.

78
 EIA/EMP Report

Table 4-5 Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants

Locations
Periyavet
NAAQ
Parameters Project Chennim Vailkaal Kummaka Muthu tupalaya V.C.V.Naga Perundu
Conc. Standards
Site a Valasu medu lipalayam Nagar m r rai
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min. 37.2 32.6 31.4 36.8 35.0 35.1 36.5 41.8
PM10 Conc. Max. 100 53.0 46.5 44.8 52.4 49.9 50.0 52.0 59.6
(µg/m³) Avg. (24 44.5 39.6 37.65 44.04 41.9 42 43.7 50.1
98th Hours)
‘tile 52.6 46.2 44.5 52.1 49.6 49.7 51.7 59.3
Min. 18.0 16.4 14.9 19.0 17.9 17.3 18.9 23.7
PM2.5 Conc.
Max. 60 25.7 23.3 21.2 27.1 25.5 24.6 26.9 33.8
(µg/m3)
Avg. (24 21.6 19.6 17.8 22.8 21.4 20.7 22.6 28.4
98th Hours)
‘tile 25.6 23.7 21.1 27.0 25.3 24.5 26.7 33.6
Min. 8.1 5.7 6.5 6.0 7.9 6.6 6.8 7.7
SO2 Conc. 80
Max. 11.5 8.1 9.3 8.6 11.3 9.4 9.8 10.9
(µg/m3) (24
Avg. 9.7 6.8 7.8 7.2 9.5 7.9 8.2 9.2
Hours)
98th 11.5 8.0 9.2 8.5 11.2 9.3 9.7 10.9

79
 EIA/EMP Report

Locations
Periyavet
NAAQ
Parameters Project Chennim Vailkaal Kummaka Muthu tupalaya V.C.V.Naga Perundu
Conc. Standards
Site a Valasu medu lipalayam Nagar m r rai
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
‘tile
Min. 19.53 15.19 12.60 13.769 17.702 15.739 17.368 19.53
NO2
Max. 80 27.84 21.658 17.957 19.623 25.228 22.431 24.752 27.84
Conc.(µg/m3)
Avg., (24 23.4 18.2 15.09 16.49 21.2 18.85 20.8 23.4
98th Hours)
‘tile 27.7 21.5 17.9 19.5 25.1 22.3 24.6 27.7
Avg. 1 BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL
Pb (μg/m3)
(24 hour) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05)
Avg. 4
CO (mg/m3) 0.22 0.4 0.1 0.25 0.34 0.33 0.15 0.23
(1hour)
Avg. 180 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
O3 (μg/m3) 11.63 11.38
(1hour) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10)
Avg. 5
C6H6 (μg/m3) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1)
(Annual)
C20H12 (a) , Avg. 1
BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1) BDL (1)
(ng/m3) (Annual)

80
 EIA/EMP Report

Locations
Periyavet
NAAQ
Parameters Project Chennim Vailkaal Kummaka Muthu tupalaya V.C.V.Naga Perundu
Conc. Standards
Site a Valasu medu lipalayam Nagar m r rai
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Avg. 6
As (ng/ m3) BDL (2) BDL (2) BDL (2) BDL (2) BDL (2) BDL (2) BDL (2) BDL (2)
(Annual)
Avg. 20 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Ni (ng/m3)
(Annual) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10) (DL 10)
Avg. 400 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
NH3 (μg/m3) 6.1 6.3
(24hours) (DL 5) (DL 5) (DL 5) (DL 5) (DL 5) (DL 5)

Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit)

81
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-13 Trends of Measured Ambient Concentrations Primary Pollutant in the Study Area

82
 EIA/EMP Report

4.6.4 Observations

Ambient Air Quality was monitored at 8 locations within the study area. The particulate
matter PM2.5 ranged between 17.8 – 28.4 μg/m3 across the monitoring locations, PM10
ranged between 37.65 – 50.1 μg/m3, SO2 varied between 6.8-9.7 μg/m3, NO2 varied
between 15.09 - 23.40 μg/m3, all the parameters are well within the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards during the study period.

4.7 Noise Environment

The prevailing ambient noise level at a particular location is nothing but the resultant
(total) of all kinds of noise sources existing at various distances around that location.
The ambient noise level at a location varies continuously depending on the type of
surrounding activities.
Ambient noise levels have been established by monitoring noise levels at Eight (08)
locations in and around 10Km distance from project area during the study period using
precision noise level meter. The noise monitoring locations in the study area were
selected after giving due consideration to the various land use categories. The land use
categories include commercial, residential, rural and sensitive areas. Noise levels were
recorded on an hourly basis for one complete day at each location using pre-calibrated
noise levels. Sampling locations are given in Table 4-6 and map noise showing the noise
monitoring locations are given inFigure 4-14.

4.7.1 Results and Discussions

Based on the recorded hourly noise levels at each monitoring location, the day
equivalent (Ld) and night equivalent (Ln) were calculated;
 Ld: Average noise levels between 6:00 hours to 22.00 hours.
 Ln: Average noise levels between 22:00 hours to 6.00 hours.
The comparison of day equivalent noise levels (Ld) and night equivalent noise levels
(Ln) with the respective CPCB stipulated noise standards for various land use categories
are shown in the Table 4-6.

83
 EIA/EMP Report

Table 4-6Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels

CPCB Noise level in
Location Standard dB(A) Leq Environmental
S. No Location
Code Lday LNight Setting
Day Night
(Ld) (Ln)
Project Site
1. N1 65 55 60.5 51.5 Commercial
Perundurai STP
Chenniam
2. N2 55 45 49.5 40.6 Residential
Valasu
3 Vailkaalmedu N3 55 45 53.5 42.0 Residential
kummakalipalay
4 N4 55 45 51.2 43.6 Residential
am
5 Muthu Nagar N5 55 45 49.6 41.6 Residential
Periyavettupalay
6 N6 55 45 48.6 41.0 Residential
am
7 V.C.V.Nagar N7 55 45 52.3 43.2 Residential
8. Perundurai N8 65 55 61.5 53.8 Commercial

4.7.2 Observations

It is observed that the day equivalent and night equivalent noise levels at all locations
are within prescribed CPCB standards.
 In commercial area time noise levels varied from60.5dB(A) to61.5dB(A) and night
time noise levels varied from 51.3 dB(A) to 53.8 dB(A), which is within prescribed
limit by MoEF&CC (65 dB(A)) Day time &55dB(A) Night time).
 In residential area day time noise levels varied from 48.6 dB (A) to 53.5dB (A) and
night time noise levels varied from 40.6dB (A) to 43.6 dB (A) across the sampling
stations. The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient
noise levels in Residential area noise are within the limit prescribed by MoEF&CC
(55 dB (A) Day time & 45 dB (A) Night time).

84
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-14Map showing the noise monitoring locations

85
 EIA/EMP Report

4.8 Water Environment

4.8.1 Surface Water Resources

Surface water plays major role in irrigation when compared to the ground water source.
The assessment of present status of surface water quality within the study area was
conducted by collecting water samples from surface water bodies (Lakes, ponds, rivers,
canals) during the period of April-June 2017. The sampling locations have been
identified on the basis of their importance.

4.8.2 Surface Water Quality Assessment

Water quality monitoring and assessment can be used to determine ambient water
quality, the extent and causes of a water quality problem, or to measure the
effectiveness of best management practices being implemented in water system.
Monitoring helps to determine the trends in the quality of the aquatic environment and
the impact due to the release of contaminants, other anthropogenic activities, and/or by
waste treatment operations (impact monitoring).To establish the baseline status of
water environment, the representative sampling locations for surface water within a
radial distance of 10Km from project site have been selected as per CPCB guidelines of
Water Quality Monitoring through an adequate survey of the project area. Test methods
used for the analysis of water quality parameters is given in Table 4-7.Water sampling
location and map of sampling location are given in

Table 4-8and Figure 4-15.

Table 4-7Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters
Sl.
No Parameter Measured Test Method
1 Colour IS:3025 (Part- 4) 1983 (Reaff 2006)
2 Turbidity IS 3025(Part - 10):1984
3 pH IS:3025 (Part - 11): 1983 (Reaff: 2006)
4 Conductivity IS:3025 (Part - 14): 1983 (Reaff: 2006)
5 Total Dissolve Solids IS: 3025:1(Part - 16) 1984 (Reaff 2006)

87
 EIA/EMP Report

6 Total Suspended Solids IS 3025 (Part - 17) 1984 (Reaff 1996)

7 Alkalinity as CaCO3 IS:3025,1 (Part - 23) 1986 (Reaff 2009)
8 Total Hardness as CaCo3 IS:3025 (Part - 21) 1983 (Reaff 2006)
9 Sodium IS:3025,5(Part - 45) 1993 (Reaff 2006)
10 Potassium IS:3025,5(Part - 45) 1993 (Reaff 2006)
11 Calcium as Ca IS 3025 (Part - 40):1991
12 Magnesium as Mg IS 3025 (Part - 46) 1994
13 Carbonate IS 3025, (Pt 23) 1986 (R 2006)
14 Bi carbonate IS 3025, (Pt 23) 1986 (R 2006)
15 Chloride IS 3025 (Part - 32):1988
16 Sulphate SO4 IS 3025(Part - 24):1986
17 Nitrate as NO3 ASTM (Part - 31)1978
18 Phosphate IS 3025 (Pt 45) 1993 (R 2006)
19 Fluorides as F IS 3025 (Part - 60):2008
20 Cyanide IS 3025 (Part-27):1986
21 Arsenic IS 3025:(Part-37):1988(Reaff 2009)
22 Boron IS:3025 (Part - 57):2003
23 Cadmium IS 3025 (Part - 41)1991
24 Chromium, Total IS:3025 (Part - 52) 2003 (Reaff 2009)
25 Copper IS:3025 (Part - 42)1992 (Reaff: 2009)
26 Iron IS 3025 (Part - 53):2003
27 Lead IS:3025 (Part - 47) 1994 (Reaff 2009)
28 Manganese IS 3025:(Part - 59):2006
29 Mercury IS 3025 (Part48):1994 RA 1999
30 Nickel IS 3025:(Part-54):2003(Reaff 2009)
31 Selenium IS 3025 Part (56)2003
32 Zinc IS:3025 (Part - 49) 1994 (Reaff 2009)
33 Dissolved Oxygen IS:3025 (Part - 38)1989 (Reaff 2009)
34 BOD 5210B APHA22nd Edn 2012
35 COD IS:3025 (Part-58)-2006

88
 EIA/EMP Report

Table 4-8Details of Surface water sampling locations

Location Distance in
S .No Location Direction
Code Km
1 Vellode Pond SW1 6.92 ESE
Lower Bhavani
2 canal SW2 9.79 SE
(Downstream)
3 Sellampatti kulam SW3 4.03 NNW
Lower Bhavani
4 canal SW4 5.71 NNE
(Upstream)

89
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-15Map showing the surface water monitoring locations

90
 EIA/EMP Report

Table 4-9Physicochemical Parameters of Surface water samples from study area

Surface
water Lower Sellam Lower
S.N Vellode
Parameter Unit Standard Bhavani canal patti Bhavani canal
o Pond
(IS 2296 (Downstream) kulam (Upstream)
Class-A)
1 Source Lake River pond river
2 Turbidity NTU 1 3.7 3.9 3.8 4.1
3 PH -- 6.5-8.5 7.45 7.32 7.87 7.35
µS/c
4 EC … 883 789 751 809
m
Total Dissolve
5 mg/l 500 578 495 460 565
Solids
6 TSS mg/l 4.5 4.9 4.7 5.3
Total
7 mg/l - 168.9 136.9 118.9 159.8
Alkalinity
Total
8 mg/l 200 225.2 151.3 124.8 166.8
Hardness
9 Sodium mg/l - 103 74.7 58 91.7
10 Potassium mg/l - 21 15.8 13.6 17
11 Calcium ++ mg/l - 48.1 44.8 36 41.7
12 Magnesium ++ mg/l …. 25.5 9.56 8.45 15.2
13 Carbonate mg/l - 0 0 0 0
14 Bi Carbonate mg/l - 206.0 167.0 145.0 195.0
15 Chloride mg/l 250 125 136 98 150
16 Sulphate mg/l 400 48 38 35 44
17 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 20 1.52 1.82 1.33 2.18
18 Phosphate mg/l - 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.09
19 Fluorides as F mg/l 1.5 0.24 0.46 0.69 0.69
BDL
BDL (DL
23 Cyanide mg/l 0.05 BDL (DL 0.01) (DL BDL (DL 0.01)
0.01)
0.01)
BDL
BDL (DL
24 Arsenic mg/l 0.05 BDL (DL 0.005) (DL BDL (DL 0.005)
0.005)
0.005)

91
 EIA/EMP Report

BDL
BDL (DL
25 Boron mg/l - BDL (DL 0.1) (DL BDL (DL 0.1)
0.1)
0.1)
BDL (
BDL ( DL
26 Cadmium mg/l 0.01 BDL ( DL 0.01) DL BDL ( DL 0.01)
0.01)
0.01)
Chromium, BDL(DL0. BDL(DL
27 mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.01) BDL(DL0.01)
Total 01) 0.01)
28 Iron mg/l 0.3 0.11 0.19 0.21 0.14
BDL(DL0. BDL(DL
29 Lead mg/l 0.1 BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)
1) 0.1)
BDL(DL0. BDL(DL
30 Manganese mg/l 0.5 BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)
1) 0.1)
BDL(DL0. BDL(DL
31 Mercury mg/l 0.001 BDL(DL0.001) BDL(DL0.001)
001) 0.001)
BDL(DL0. BDL(DL
32 Nickel mg/l - BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)
1) 0.1)
BDL(DL0. BDL(DL
33 Selenium mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.005) BDL(DL0.005)
005) 0.005)
Dissolved
34 mg/l 6 5.1 6 5.3 5.8
Oxygen
35 COD mg/l … 13.2 10.1 15.2 9.7
36 BOD mg/l 2 5.2 3.2 5.9 3.8
Note: BDL – Below Detectable Limit, DL – Detectable Limit

4.8.3 Results and Discussions

 In the surface water the pH varied between 7.32 – 7.87 which is meeting
the IS: 2296 -1982 for inland surface water. The pH value for all the
samples in the study area during study period found to be within the
limits.
 The Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 460-578 mg/l for the
surface water The TDS value of some of the samples meeting class A and
remaining meeting class B standards of IS: 2296 -1982.

92
 EIA/EMP Report

 The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible

limit is 1000 mg/l. The chloride content in the ground water for study
area is ranges between 98 mg/l -150 mg/l
 The Sulphate content of the surface water meeting the minimum range of
35 mg/l and maximum range of 48 mg/l. The surface water samples
meeting the class A standard of IS: 2296 1982.
 The Total hardness ranges is between 125 – 225 mg/l for ground water
its meeting the permissible limit of the IS 2296-1982
 DO, BOD and COD values from the collected water samples varies from 5.1
to 6 mg/l, 3.2 to 5.9 mg/l and 9.7 to 15.2 mg/l respectively.

Table 4-10- Surface water quality criteria for different uses

(specified by CPCB, 1979 and the Bureau of Indian Standards, 1982)
S.No Parameters Unit A B C D E

1 Colour Hazen 10 300 300 --- ---

2 Turbidity NTU --- --- --- --- ---
3 pH -- 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5
4 Conductivity µS/cm --- --- --- 1000 2250
Total Dissolved
5 mg/l 500 --- 1500 --- 2100
Solids
Alkalinity as
6 mg/l --- --- --- --- ---
CaCO3
Total Hardness
7 mg/l 300 --- --- --- ---
as CaCO3
8 Calcium as Ca mg/l 80.10 --- --- --- ---
Magnesium as
9 mg/l 24.28 --- --- --- ---
Mg
10 Sodium mg/l --- --- --- --- ---
11 Potassium mg/l --- --- --- --- ---
12 Chloride as Cl mg/l 250 --- 600 --- 600
13 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 400 --- 400 --- 1000
14 Phosphorous mg/l --- --- --- --- ---
15 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 20 --- 50 --- ---

93
 EIA/EMP Report

16 Fluorides as F mg/l 1.5 1.5 1.5 --- ---

17 Cyanide mg/l 0.05 0.05 0.05 --- ---
18 Arsenic mg/l 0.05 0.2 0.2 --- ---
19 Cadmium mg/l 0.01 --- 0.01 --- ---
20 Chromium, Total mg/l 0.05 0.05 0.05 --- ---
21 Copper mg/l 1.5 --- 1.5 --- ---
22 Iron mg/l 0.3 --- 50 --- ---
23 Lead mg/l 0.1 --- 0.1 --- ---
24 Zinc mg/l 15 --- 15 --- ---
25 Manganese mg/l 0.5 --- --- --- ---
26 Selenium mg/l 0.01 --- 0.05 --- ---
27 Mercury mg/l 0.001 --- --- --- ---
Dissolved
28 mg/l 6 5 4 4 ---
Oxygen
29 COD mg/l --- --- --- --- ---
30 BOD mg/l 2 3 3 --- ---
Class A – Drinking water without conventional treatment but after disinfection.
Class B –Water for outdoor bathing.
Class C – Drinking water with conventional treatment followed by disinfection.
Class D – Water for fish culture and wild life propagation.
Class E – Water for irrigation, industrial cooling and controlled waste disposal

4.8.4 Groundwater resources

The development of ground water for irrigation in the district is mainly through dug
wells tapping the weathered residum. The yields of dug wells are improved at favorable
locations by construction of extension bores, which are 40 to 75 m deep. Bore wells
have also become popular as the source for irrigation in the district in recent years. Dug
wells with extension bores wherever necessary is ideal for hard rock areas
Source:http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/3309_PART_B_DCHB_ERODE.pdf

4.8.5 Groundwater Quality

Groundwater is the principal source for domestic and drinking purposes in almost all
villages near the study area. The quality of the groundwater received is influenced by

94
 EIA/EMP Report

pollution of soil and air, industrial and domestic waste disposal, organic components,
pathogenic microorganisms, application of fertilizers and pesticides in agriculture, etc.
Total Eight (08) ground water monitoring locations were identified for assessment in
different villages around the project site based on the usage of sub surface water by the
settlements/ villages in the study area. The groundwater results are compared with the
acceptable and permissible water quality standards as per IS: 10500 (2012) for
drinking water. Groundwater quality monitoring locations and results are given in
Table 4-11and Table 4-12. Map showing the groundwater monitoring locations are
given inFigure 4-16.

Table 4-11Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations

S. Location Distance in
Location Direction
No Code Km

1 STP site GW1 Within site

2 Chenniam Valasu GW2 1.70 N
3 Vailkaalmedu GW3 4.18 NE
4 kummakalipalayam GW4 1.59 SSE
5 Muthu Nagar GW5 1.98 SW
6 Periyavettupalayam GW6 3.12 WSW
7 V.C.V.Nagar GW7 0.97 NNW
8 Perundurai GW8 2.00 NW

95
 EIA/EMP Report

Figure 4-16Map showing the groundwater monitoring locations

96
 EIA/EMP Report

Table 4-12Physico chemical analysis of Ground water samples from study area
Drinki
Drinking ng
water water
Standard Standa Project

S.N (IS rd (IS site Chennia Vailkaal kummakalip Muthu Periyavettup V.C.V.Nag Perundu
Parameters Unit
o 10500: 10500: Perundu m Valasu medu alayam Nagar alayam ar rai
2012) 2012) rai STP
Permissib Accept
le Limit able
Limit

Haze BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL
1 Colour 15 5 BDL (DL 1.0) BDL (DL 1.0)
n 1.0) 1.0) 1.0) 1.0) 1.0) 1.0)
BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL
2 Turbidity NTU 1 BDL (DL 0.1) BDL (DL 0.1)
0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1)
No
3 pH -- relaxatio 6.5-8.5 7.65 7.45 7.55 7.55 7.65 7.45 7.81 7.65
n
µS/c
4 EC … … 1780 1230 1289 1674 1703 1483 1633 1759
m
Total
5 Dissolve mg/l 2000 500 1174 746 807 1007 1084 892 1003 1166
Solids
6 Total … … BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1)

97
 EIA/EMP Report

Suspended
Solids
Alkalinity as
7 mg/l 600 200 333 245 256 324 336 276 316 340
CaCO3
Total
8 Hardness as mg/l 600 200 533 293 322 443 499 357 426 495
CaCo3
9 Sodium mg/l … 153 95.8 108 130 180 127 148 174
10 Potassium mg/l … 43.3 23.9 26.6 37.5 45.3 30.8 35.5 41.3
Calcium as
11 mg/l 200 75 134 85 93 122 152 102.0 117.0 129
Ca
Magnesium
12 mg/l 100 30 48.2 19.6 21.8 33.5 28.9 24.8 32.4 42
as Mg
BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL 1.0) BDL (DL BDL (DL 1.0) BDL (DL BDL (DL
13 Carbonate mg/l … …
1.0) 1.0) 1.0) 1.0) 1.0) 1.0)
14 Bi carbonate mg/l … … 406 299 312 395 410 337 386 415
15 Chloride mg/l 1000 250 250 143 159 190 165 167 188 227
16 Sulphate SO4 mg/l 400 200 107 54 61.7 71.8 70.4 74.9 67 105
Nitrate as
17 mg/l 45 6.50 8.10 6.20 4.30 8.50 8.40 6.50 7.20
NO3
BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0.
18 Phosphorous mg/l - BDL(DL0.02) BDL(DL0.02)
02) 02) 02) 02) 02) 02)
Fluorides as
19 1.5 1 0.26 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.21 0.13 0.25 0.22
F
23 Cyanide mg/l 0.05 BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL

98
 EIA/EMP Report

0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01)

BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL
24 Arsenic mg/l 0.05 0.01
0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005)
BDL ( DL BDL ( DL BDL ( DL BDL ( DL BDL ( DL BDL ( DL BDL ( DL BDL ( DL
26 Cadmium mg/l 0.003
0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001)
Chromium, BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0.
27 mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.01) BDL(DL0.01)
Total 01) 01) 01) 01) 01) 01)
28 Copper mg/l 1.5 0.05 0.007 0.008 0.009 BDL (DL0.05) 0.065 0.019 0.007 0.045
29 Iron mg/l 0.3 0.03 0.025 0.045 0.38 0.45 0.16 0.15 0.71
BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL
30 Lead mg/l 0.01
0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005)
BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0.
31 Manganese mg/l 0.1 BDL(DL0.05) BDL(DL0.05)
05) 05) 05) 05) 05) 05)
BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0.
33 Nickel mg/l 0.02 BDL(DL0.01) BDL(DL0.01)
01) 01) 01) 01) 01) 01)
BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0.005 BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0.005 BDL(DL0. BDL(DL0.
34 Selenium mg/l 0.01
005) 005) 005) ) 005) ) 005) 005)
35 Zinc mg/l 15 5 0.36 0.25 0.52 0.22 0.32 0.36 0.25 0.22
Note: BDL – Below Detectable Limit, DL – Detectable Limit

99
 EIA/EMP Report

4.8.6 Results and Discussions

A summary of analytical results are presented below:

 The ground water results of the study area indicate that the average pH ranges is
varied between 7.45-7.81
 The desirable limit of the Total Dissolved Solids is 500 mg/l and permissible
limit is 2000 mg/l. Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 746 mg/l -
1174 mg/l for the ground water and its meets the permissible limits of IS 10500:
2012
 The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250 mg/l and permissible limit is
1000 mg/l. The chloride content in the ground water for study area is ranges
between 143 mg/l -250 mg/l
 The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is
400mg/l. the sulphate content of the ground water of the study area is varied
between 54 mg/l -107 mg/l meeting the desirable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.
 The Total hardness ranges is between 293-533 mg/l for ground water and all
location within the permissible limit of the IS 10500:2012.

4.9 Soil as a resource and its Quality

The soil sampling locations were identified to assess the fertility and agricultural
characteristics of the red soil and also to assess the impact of the sludge leachate in the
immediate surroundings. The sampling locations were selected within 10 Km around
the project site. The identification of the sampling stations is based on the sensitivity of
the location, distance and direction with respect to the proposed project site. Soil
sampling locations and results are given in Table 4-13&Table 4-14.

Table 4-13Soil & Sediment Quality Monitoring Locations

S. Location Distance in
Location Direction
No Code Km

Project Site
1 S1 Within site
Perundurai STP
2 Chenniam Valasu S2 1.70 N
3 Vailkaalmedu S3 4.18 NE
4 Kummakalipalayam S4 1.59 SSE

100
 EIA/EMP Report

5 Muthu Nagar S5 1.98 SW

6 Periyavettupalayam S6 3.12 WSW
7 V.C.V.Nagar S7 0.97 NNW
8 Perundurai S8 2.00 NW

101
 EIA/EMP Report

Table 4-14Physico Chemical parameters of soil samples from the study area
S.No Parameters Units S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8

Yellowish Dark Reddish Reddish Reddish Yellowis

1. Colour - Brown Red
Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown h Brown
Sandy
2. Texture -
Clay Clay Loam Clay Clay Clay Clay Clay
3. Sand % 14 12 63 16 10 22 18 10
4. Silt % 11 9 18 11 12 20 18 14
5. Clay % 75 79 19 73 78 58 64 76
6. pH - 7.46 7.67 7.57 7.21 7.31 6.67 7.24 7.71
Electrical µmhos
7.
Conductivity /cm 440 528 244 395 512 295 326 457
8. Bulk Density gm/cc 1.17 1.33 1.36 1.29 1.35 1.33 1.25 1.24
Cation Exchange meq/1
9.
Capacity 00 gm 28.3 30.6 7.8 27.6 30.4 23.0 26.1 28.8
10. Moisture content % 19.04 21.7 8.78 16.6 21.3 12.7 12.34 18.75
Water Holding
11. %
Capacity 26.9 28.5 27.2 20.9 27.3 27.3 21.0 27.8
12. Organic Carbon % 0.631 0.787 0.215 0.756 0.845 0.659 0.744 0.619
13. Organic matter % 1.09 1.36 0.37 1.30 1.46 1.14 1.28 1.07

102
 EIA/EMP Report

14. Nitrogen as N mg/kg 140 241 56.3 173 259 160 228 175
15. Phosphorus mg/kg 193 148 97 198 191 180 183 184
16. Potassium mg/kg 114 187 53 138 200 129 178 139
17. Calcium % 220 316 78 174 271 233 329 243
18. Magnesium % 50 112 27 46 95 39 44 69
BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL
19 Cadmium mg/kg
0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1)
BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL BDL(DL
20 Chromium mg/kg
0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1)
21 Iron mg/kg 0.03 0.25 0.18 0.10 0.23 0.16 0.08 0.07

103
 EIA/EMP Report

4.9.1 Results and Discussions

Summary of analytical results

 The pH of the soil samples ranged from 6.67 -7.71 indicating that the soils are
almost neutral in nature.
 Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from 244-528 μS/cm. As the EC value is
less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline in nature
 The Moisture Content of the soil samples varied from 8.78-21.7 (%).
 Nitrogen content ranged from 56.3 to 259 mg/ha
 Phosphorous ranged from 97 to 198 mg/ha
 Potassium content ranges from 53 to 200 mg/ha.

4.10 Ecological Environment

Baseline Biological survey was carried out to assess the ecology of the study area. The
floral diversity is grouped into trees, shrubs, climbers, herbs, aquatic plants and
phytoplankton. Similarly, the faunal diversity is grouped into mammals, birds, reptiles,
amphibians and zooplankton. Discussions were held with local people to gather related
information on the richness of plant and animal resources, employment opportunities,
facilities for education, health and socio-economic condition.
To identify any floral species of conservation importance existing in the study area, the
status evaluation of the observed flora has been done as per the IUCN.

4.10.1 Flora

According to primary survey conducted in the study area and the information collected
from secondary resources, a diverse species of flora was observed in the study area. List
of flora observed/reported in the study area is given in Table 4-15.

Table 4-15Floral species observed within the study area

Scientific name Family Common IUCN status
S. No
name
1. Acacia Nilotica Mimosaceae Babool LC
2. Acacia planifrons Mimosaceae Umbrella NA
Thorn
3. Aegle marmelos Rutaceae Stone apple NA

104
 EIA/EMP Report

4. Albizia lebbeck Mimosaceae Siris tree NA

5. Annona squamosa Annonaceae Custard apple NA
6. Bambusa bambos Poaceae Giant NA
thorny bamboo
7. Carica papaya Caricaceae Papaya DD
8. Casuarina equisetifolia Casurinaceae Savukku NA
L.
9. Cocos nucifera Arecaceae Tennai NA
10. Mangifera indica L. Anacardiaceae Mango DD
11. Murraya paniculata Moringaceae Orange Jasmine NA
12. Anacardium Anacardiaceae Kaju NA
Occidentale
13. Azadiracta Indica Meliaceae Neem -
14. Bombax Ceiba Malvaceae Cotton Tree NA
15. Bauhinia Racemosa Caesalpiniaceae Katmauli NA
16. Cassia Fistula Caesalpiniaceae Amaltas LC
17. Dalbergia Latifolia Fabaceae Kala Sheesham VU
18. Ficus Benghalensis Moraceae Kamarup NA
19. Mangifera Indica Anacardiaceae Aam DD
20. Ziziphus Mauritiana Rhamnaceae Ber NA
21. Syzygium Cumini Mytraceae Jamun NA
22. Moringa Oleifera Moraceae Senjana NA
23. Lantana Camera Verbanaceae Raimuniya NA
24. Jatropha Glandulidera Euphorbiaceae Jangli Erandi NA
25. Cassia Tora Caesalpiniaceae Chakunda NA
IUCN- International Union for Conservation of Nature, LC- Least Concern, NT- near
Threatened, EN- Endangered, NA-Not yet assessed, DD -Data Deficient, VU-Vulnerable

4.10.2 Fauna

List of faunal species observed/reported within the study area is given in Table 4-16.

Table 4-16Fauna species observed within the study area

S. No Scientific name Common name IUCN status

105
 EIA/EMP Report

Birds
1. Pseudibis papillosa Black Ibis LC
2. Milvus migrans Black kite LC
3. Haliastur Indus Brahminy kite LC
4. Pavo cristatus Indian peacock LC
5. Vanellus indicus Red-wattled LC
lapwing
6. Apus affinis House swift LC
7. Merops orientalis Green bee eater LC
Reptiles
8. Calotes versicolor Garden lizard --
9. Eutropis macularia Common skink NA
10. Ophisops leschenaultii Snake-eyed NA
lizard
Mammals
11. Funambulus palmarum Squirrels LC
12. Rattus sp. Rat LC
13. Herpestes edwardsii Grey Mongoose LC
14. Cynopterus sphinx Short nosed LC
fruit bat
15. Megaderma lyra Indian false LC
vampire bat
IUCN- International Union for Conservation of Nature, LC- Least Concern, NT- near
Threatened, EN- Endangered, NA-Not yet assessed, DD -Data Deficient, VU-Vulnerable

4.11 Socio Economic profile

Erode district stands 15th rank among the highest population size of the State. Tamil
Nadu. The population of the district is 22,51,744 which comprise of 11,29,868 male and
11,21,876 female populations.
Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/3309_PART_B_DCHB_ERODE.pdf

106
 EIA/EMP Report

4.11.1 Socio Economic Aspects

A socio-economic study was undertaken in assessing aspects which are dealing with
social and cultural conditions, and economic status in the study area. The study
provides information such as demographic structure, population dynamics,
infrastructure resources, and the status of human health and economic attributes like
employment, per-capita income, agriculture, trade, and industrial development in the
study area. The study of these characteristic helps in identification, prediction and
evaluation of impacts on socio-economic and parameters of human interest due to
proposed project developments. The parameters are:
 Demographic structure
 Infrastructure Facility
 Economic Status
 Health status
 Cultural attributes
 Awareness and opinion of people about the project and Industries in the area.
The following
Table 4-17 provides the certain important social indicators of Erode district in Tamil
Nadu.
Table 4-17 Social Indicators of PIA District
S.No Social Indicators Erode
1 Decadal variation % 11.77
2 Urban population % 51.4
3 Sex ratio 993
4 0-6 age group 953
5 Population density (Persons per square Km) 391
6 Scheduled caste population % 16.41
7 Scheduled tribe population % 0.97
8 Literacy rate % 72.60
9 Work Participation rate % 53.10
10 Main Workers % 92.91
11 Marginal Workers % 7.09
12 Cultivators % 14.90

107
 EIA/EMP Report

13 Agricultural labourers % 30.96

14 Workers in household industries % 4.54
15 Other workers % 49.60
Source:http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/33/3309_PART_A_DCHB_ER
ODE.pdf

4.11.2 Population and Household Size

The total population of Erode district is 22,51,744 which comprise of 11,29,868 male
and 11,21,876 female. Rural population in Erode district is 10,93,768 and Urban
population is 11,57,976.
The highest number of inhabited villages (66) is in Sathyamangalam taluk while
Bhavani taluk had the lowest number (51) of inhabited villages. Kavandapadi village
(L.C. No. 634885) in Bhavani taluk had the highest population of 28590 and
Devakiammapuram village (L.C. No. 635075) in Erode taluk had the lowest population
of 176 in the district.
The district has recorded 66.3% of rural household having no latrine which ranked the
3rd least among the districts.
Source:
http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/33/3309_PART_A_DCHB_ERODE.pdf

4.11.3 Sex Ratio

The sex ratio of the population is calculated for number of females for every 1000
males, irrespective of age. The child sex ratio is also calculated in the same manner for
the children aged upto 6 years.Likewise, sex ratio in the State has reported 996 whereas
the district reported only 993.The child sex ratio in the State has reported 943 whereas
the district reported 953.
Source:
http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/33/3309_PART_A_DCHB_ERODE.pdf

4.11.4 Scheduled Caste (SC) & Scheduled Tribes (ST)

The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Erode district share sizeable portion
of the total population. Majority of them live in rural areas. They are being specially
treated under various development schemes for their over all development in the

108
 EIA/EMP Report

district. The Scheduled Tribes mostly live in Sathyamangalam taluk, majority of them
belong to Sholagas
Source:
http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/33/3309_PART_A_DCHB_ERODE.pdf

4.11.5 Education & Literacy

A person aged 7 and above who can both read and write with understanding in any
language has been taken as literate. A person who can merely read but cannot write is
not literate. It is not necessary that a person who is literate should have received any
formal education or should have passed any minimum educational standard. In 1991
Census, all children of aged 6 years or less are treated as illiterates although they may
be going to school and can read and write a few odd words. During 1981 Census this
limit was upto the age of 4 years. It has also been decided in the 2011 Census to use only
effective literacy rates i.e., the ratio of literates and population excluding the age group
of 0-6. Literacy has increased in Erode district while compared to 2001 literacy
rate.Table 4-18 Show the details of education infrastructures.

Table 4-18Educational Infrastructure in PIA District and State

Percentage of Literates

State/District Persons Male Female

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
Tamil Nadu 73.5 80.1 82.4 86.8 64.4 73.4
Erode 65.4 72.6 75.1 80.4 55.5 64.7
Source:
http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/33/3309_PART_A_DCHB_ERODE.pdf

4.11.6 Health Facilities

Primary Health Centers (PHCs) and Health Sub-centers (HSCs) are providing the
preventive, curative and rehabilitative health care services to the rural people. The
district has good number of public health systems accessible and affordable apart from
the private health facilities. The Health Facilities given in Table 4-19.

109
 EIA/EMP Report

Table 4-19Socio Economic analysis: Health care

Name of the
Type SC PHC CHC SDH DH Total
District
Public 311 62 14 7 1 395
Erode Private 0 0 1 0 0 1
Total 311 62 15 7 1 396
(Source: National Health Mission, as on February 07, 2019)

4.11.7 Economic Activity

The percentage of main workers, marginal workers and non-workers for persons in
Erode district were 92.90, 7.10 and 46.90 respectively.The percentage among males for
the same category of workers were 94.80, 5.20 and 35.20. The percentage among
females for these categories of workers were 90.00, 10.00, 58.70 respectively.
Source:
http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/33/3309_PART_A_DCHB_ERODE.pdf

4.11.8 Social Economic Profile of the study area

The villages and towns covering less than 10 km radius from the boundary of the
project site is taken for the study. Table 4-20 shows the list of villages and town which
comes under the study area. Table 4-21 shows the socio-economic indicators within
the study area

Table 4-20List of villages and Town in the study area

S.No Name 9. Mukasi Pulavapalayam
0-5km radius 10. Mukasipidariyur
1. Ingur 11. Ottaparai
2. Sullipalayam 12. Varapalayam
3. Perundurai 13. Kambiliyampatti
4. Poovampalayam 14. Moongilpalayam
5. Pattacharampalayam 15. Ponmudi
5-10km radius 16. Kullampalayam
6. Pungampadi 17. Ayegoundampalayam
7. Veppampalayam 18. Seenapuram
8. Thottani 19. Thuduppathi

110
 EIA/EMP Report

20. Nimittipalayam 23. Koorapalayam

21. Chinnamallampalayam 24. Rayapalayam
22. Thiruvachi 25. Olapalayam

Table 4-21Summary of Socio-economic indicators within the study area

Study area
S.No Particulars Unit
0-5 Km 5-10 Km

1 Number of villages in the Study Area 5 22 Nos.

2 Number of Towns in the Study Area 1 2 Nos.
3 Total Households 28415 18544 Nos.
4 Total Population 95264 61805 Nos.
5 Children Population (<6 Years Old) 7776 4916 Nos.
6 SC Population 15763 8722 Nos.
7 ST Population 89 80 Nos.
8 Total Working Population 53010 34876 Nos.
9 Main Workers 50094 33052 Nos.
10 Marginal Workers 2916 1824 Nos.
11 Cultivators 9867 4684 Nos.
12 Agricultural labours 13089 6326 Nos.
13 Household Industries 2789 2068 Nos.
14 Other Workers 24349 19974 Nos.
15 Literates 62125 40632 Nos.

A walk-through survey was conducted by visiting rural place within the 10 km radius.
While doing so, many interactions with various people like farmers, women, labours,
teachers, health workers, etc. were conducted.

4.11.9 Employment and Livelihood within study area

The main occupation of the area is agriculture and their related activities. The principal
crops in the survey area are Paddy, groundnut, Cotton, Turmeric, Gingelly etc.,

111
 EIA/EMP Report

As agriculture cannot be a main sustenance for most of farmers, they have dual
professions. Farming is mostly seasonal, they involve in other livelihood activities like
business, non-agriculture labour, agriculture labour and other service sectors.
Fragmentation of landholding leads to adopt to have additional occupation.

Table 4-22Summary of Employment and Livelihood within the study area

Study Area

Sl.NO Type of workers 0-5 Km 5-10 Km

Main Marginal Main Marginal
1 Cultivators 9867 205 33052 136
2 Agri. Laborers 13089 1194 6326 420
3 Household Industries 2789 37 2068 39
4 Others 24349 172 19974 126

4.11.10 Educational Infrastructure within study area

The district has good primary and secondary education infrastructure in urban and
rural areas. The people around the study area have well connected to educational
infrastructures. The educational facilities of industry area are in summarized in Table
4-23.

Table 4-23Details of Education facilities within study area

Numbers
S. No Type of School
0-5 Km 5-10 Km
1 Government Pre-Primary school 6 22
2 Private Pre-Primary school 2 1
3 Government Primary school 21 38
4 Private Primary school 5 4
5 Government Middle school 7 12
6 Private Middle school 2 6
7 Government Secondary school 3 3
8 Private Secondary school 2 5
9 Government Senior Secondary school 2 1
10 Private Senior Secondary school 3 3

112
 EIA/EMP Report

The following Table 4-24 shows the literates population and the percentage within the
study area

Table 4-24Literates population and the percentage within the study area
Total Literates %
Sl. No Name
Population Population Literates
0-5 Km
1 Ingur 5986 3970 66.3
2 Sullipalayam 2990 2191 73.3
3 Perundurai 82255 52970 64.4
4 Poovampalayam 846 687 81.2
5 Pattacharampalayam 3187 2307 72.4
5-10 Km
1 Pungampadi 2463 1696 68.9
2 Veppampalayam 2348 1564 66.6
3 Thottani 957 591 61.8
4 Mukasi Pulavapalayam 1020 718 70.4
5 Mukasipidariyur 14143 9791 69.2
6 Ottaparai 9493 6447 67.9
7 Varapalayam 2962 1624 54.8
8 Kambiliyampatti 2465 800 32.5
9 Moongilpalayam 3283 2211 67.3
10 Ponmudi 1219 869 71.3
11 Kullampalayam 3089 2156 69.8
12 Ayegoundampalayam 2772 1852 66.8
13 Seenapuram 2692 1736 64.5
14 Thuduppathi 2781 2099 75.5
15 Nimittipalayam 2004 970 48.4
16 Chinnamallampalayam 1029 606 58.9
17 Thiruvachi 2678 1632 60.9
18 Koorapalayam 485 302 62.3
19 Rayapalayam 638 374 58.6
20 Olapalayam 646 456 70.6

113
 EIA/EMP Report

4.11.11 Health facility within the study area

The majority of people visit nearby Hospitals/health services provided by the

Government. The area has got g ood public health facilities at easily reachable distances.
There was no major health issues reported in our survey. Even for any minor ailments
they contact medical facilities immediately as it is very accessible to them. The local
transport facilities and the communication facilities are the main reasons to get
immediate medical attention. The incidents of institutional delivery are high due to
awareness, education, economic development, proximity to health delivery system. The
Infant mortality rate and the maternal mortality rate have significantly reduced. The
health facility within the study area are given in Table 4-25.

Table 4-25Health facility within the study area

Numbers
Sl.No Type
0-5 Km 5-10 Km
1 Community health centre 0 0
2 Primary health centre 0 0
3 Primary health sub-centre 2 9
Maternity and Child Welfare
4 1 0
Centre
5 TB hospital/Clinic 0 0
6 Hospital Allopathic 0 0
7 Hospital Alternative Medicine 0 0
8 Dispensary 0 0
9 Veterinary hospital 1 2
10 Mobile health clinic 0 0
11 Family Welfare Centre 0 0

114
 EIA/EMP Report

4.11.12 Drinking water facilities within the study area

We found that in all the villages, the drinking water connectivity is well established. The
bore wells and piped water are main sources of drinking water. Table 4-26 shows the
drinking sources in the study area.

115
 EIA/EMP Report

Table 4-26Drinking water sources in the study area

Other
Tap Tap Tube
Covered Uncover Hand River/Ca Tank/Pon s
Water- Water Wells/Bore Spring
Well ed Well Pump nal d/Lake (Statu
Sl. Treated Untreated hole (Status
Name (Status (Status (Status (Status (Status s
NO (Status (Status (Status A(1)/NA
A(1)/NA A(1)/NA A(1)/NA( A(1)/NA A(1)/NA( A(1)/
A(1)/NA A(1)/NA( A(1)/NA(2) (2))
(2)) (2)) 2)) (2)) 2)) NA(2)
(2)) 2)) )
)
0-5 Km
1 Ingur 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2
2 Sullipalayam 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
3 Perundurai 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
4 Poovampalayam 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1
Pattacharampala
5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
yam
5-10 Km
1 Pungampadi 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
2 Veppampalayam 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
3 Thottani 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
Mukasi
4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
Pulavapalayam
5 Mukasipidariyur 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
6 Ottaparai 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2

116
 EIA/EMP Report

7 Varapalayam 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1
8 Kambiliyampatti 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
9 Moongilpalayam 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
10 Ponmudi 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
11 Kullampalayam 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2
Ayegoundampal
12 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
ayam
13 Seenapuram 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
14 Thuduppathi 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
15 Nimittipalayam 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
Chinnamallampa
16 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
layam
17 Thiruvachi 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
18 Koorapalayam 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2
19 Rayapalayam 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
20 Olapalayam 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2

117
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

4.11.13 Summary

The Socioeconomic profile of the study area shows that the majority of people in the
study area work in non-agricultural sector. They have good educational infrastructures
and the people in the study area are well connected to the educational infrastructures.
The average literacy rate of the study area is 64.98% which is less than the district
literacy rate of 72.6%. The people in the study area are well connected to Government
primary health centres and Primary health sub-centres and also they have emergency
ambulance service “108” which is active all over the State.

4.12 Socio-Economic Data

Information about demography and socio-economic profile was collected from the
District Census Hand book (2011) (District - Erode, Tamil Nadu). The census data
available for different blocks, taluks and towns have been analyzed with respect to
demographic profile, community structure, educational facilities, occupation structure
and infrastructure facilities.

4.12.1 Demography

The population details in the study area with male & female classification and SC, ST
population as per 2011 census are shown in Table 4-29. Children’s populations are
shown in Table 4-30.

Table 4-29Study Area Population Statistics

Total
S.No Town Male Female SC ST General
Population
Perundurai
1 24930 12214 12716 2619 17 22294
Town
2 Erode city 157101 78222 78879 17351 230 139520
Total 182031 90436 91595 19970 247 161814

Table 4-30Study Area Children’s Details

Total
Town Male Female
S.No Children
1 Perundurai Town 2240 1154 1086
2 Erode city 14599 7412 7187
Total 16839 8566 8273

118
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

4.12.2 Literacy

The number of literates and Illiterates of the study area is given in Table 4-31.

Table 4-31Study Area Literacy Statistics

S.No Taluks Literate Illiterate
1 Perundurai Town 19498 5432
2 Erode city 66750 63250
Total 86248 68682

4.12.3 Land use Pattern

The total geographical area of the study area was 322.23 Sq. Km. Cropped area
accounts for 19.34% of the total area. Forest plantation cover is accounting for
about 22.76% of the total area. A significant portion of the land falls under the
category of ‘non agriculture’ or ‘fallow lands’. Land use Pattern of the project
study area given in Table 4-32.

Table4-32Land use Pattern during 2011-02

S.No Description Percentage Area (Sq.Km)
1 Fallow land 27.08314 87.27
2 Plantation 22.76014 73.34
3 Grasslands/ Grazing
Lands 19.51712 62.89
4 Cropland 19.34022 62.32
5 Rural 5.458834 17.59
6 Urban 3.668187 11.82
7 River/ Stream/ Canals 0.946529 3.05
8 Scrub land 0.667225 2.15
9 Reservoirs/ Lakes/
Ponds 0.28551 0.92
10 Mining 0.164479 0.53
11 Barren Rocky Area 0.108618 0.35
Total 100 322.23

S.No Description Area (Sq.Km)

1 Urban 6.46
2 Plantation 6.16
3 Grass Lands 5.32
4 Fallow Land 4.19
5 Rural 1.95

119
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME
CHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

6 Cropland 1.57
7 Scrub Land 0.03

Figure 4-17Land
Land Use / Land Cover Map of Project Study Area
0.67%0.29% 0.17%
0.95% 0.11%
5.46% 3.67% Fallow land
Plantation
27.08%
Grasslands/ Grazing Lands
19.34%
Cropland
Rural
Urban
22.76% River/ Stream/ Canals
19.52%
Scrub land
Reservoirs/ Lakes/ Ponds
Mining
Barren Rocky Area

Figure 4-18 Land Use Pattern of Project Study Area

 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

4.12.4 Agriculture

Since the district is under the hot and dry climatic conditions, the dry land crop
is best suited. Agriculture in the district depends on monsoon rains. The
average rainfall of the District is below 812 mm. Paddy (69.54% of cultivable
area) and Cereals (69.80% of cultivable area) are mainly cultivated in this
district. There are ample opportunities to promote new crop varieties and new
technologies such as precision farming and System of Rice Intensification as
the farmers are now educated on these aspects and willing to adopt the new
varieties and technologies.

Table 4-33Area under principal crops during 2011 -12 in Hectares.

Net Cultivated Area Hectares 100%
Paddy 33719 21.98
Turmeric 12857 8.38
Banana 5245 3.42
Groundnut 11368 7.41
Coconut 11368 7.41
Sugarcane 31540 20.55
Others 47333 30.85

4.12.5 Irrigation

The main sources of irrigation in Perundurai block are River canal, Tanks and
Wells. The main contribution for irrigation in this region is canals, there are
4838 Canals and 938 tube wells and the area under the irrigation is 7276 Ha.
There is no coastline in this area.

4.12.6 Animal Husbandry and Fisheries

In agricultural economy, the contribution by Animal Husbandry and fisheries

sector is laudable as it goes parallel and depends on agriculture. Of late, cattle
development has taken place through setting up of an intensive cattle
development project. Apart from the cattle and buffaloes, goats, sheep and
pigs are other important livestock found in the district. The livestock census,
2012 is shown in Table 4-34.

Table 4-34Livestock Census 2012 – Erode District

S.No Livestock Quantity (No’s)

121
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

1 Cattle 2,76,564
2 Buffaloes 1,02,840
3 Sheep 1,65,277
4 Goat 3,09,202
5 Poultry 5661729

4.12.7 Mineral Resources

The limestone is available in this district; it is used for cement manufacturing

process.

4.12.8 Industries

The district has limited number of Industries. A list of medium and large scale
industries in Perundurai Taluk are given in the table below.

Table 4-35Industries in Perundurai Town

S.No. Name of Industry Location
1 M/s. Inditex Processor (P) Ltd, P.V.Palayam (Po)
2 M/s. Amudham Food Products (P) Ltd Olapalayam (Po)
3 M/s. Sri Selvakumaran Textiles Chengappalli (Po)
4 M/s.Amudham Ind. Products (P) Ltd Olapalayam (Po)
5 M/s. The Soft Tex Processing Mill P.V.Palayam (Po)
6 M/s. Shri Hari Processing Unit – I Panickampalayam (Po)
7 M/s. Gugan Knitwears (P) Ltd Panickampalayam (Po)
8 M/s. Easwari Knitting Works P.V.Palayam (Po)
9 M/s. I Tech Metal Industries SIPCOT
10 M/s. IVAX Paper Chemicals Ltd – Kovai Unit SIPCOT
11 M/s. Britannia Industries Ltd SIPCOT
12 M/s. Sree Rengaraj Ispat Industries (P) Ltd SIPCOT
13 M/s. PRD RIGS india SIPCOT
14 M/s. Sree DRG Vinyls Industries SIPCOT
15 M/s. Jay Jay Mills (India) Pvt Ltd SIPCOT

122
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

4.12.9 Education

The literacy level of Perundurai town panchayat according to 2011 census is

86%. A total literate in is 19423 as of census 2011. The information on the list
of educational institutions is given in Table 4-36.

Table 4-36 Lists of Educational Institutions in the Study town

S.No Block PUPS PUMS MUPS MUU AID- Aid-MS HS/ HSS/Aid
name S PS Aid- -HSS
Hs
1 Perundurai 13 2 - - - - - 4
2 Erode 7 5 - - 1 - 3 4
Total 20 7 - - 1 - 3 8

PUPS: Primary/Upper Primary School, PUMS: Primary/.Upper

Primary/Middle School, MUPS: Municipal Primary School, MUUS: Municipal
Upper Primary School, Aid-PS: Aided Primary School, Aid-MS: Aided Middle
School, HS: High School, HSS: Higher Secondary School (Source:
www.freetutorial.in).

4.12.10 Workforce

Table 4-37, 4-38 presents details on workforce in the Study area taluk’s.
While the rural workers are employed in agriculture and allied activities, the
urban workforce is employed in industries.

Table 4-37 Workforces in the Study Area

Marginal Non
Town Workers Main Workers
Workers Workers

Perundurai 10620 10246 374 14310

Erode 66140 63626 2514 90961
Total 76760 73872 2888 105271

123
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Table 4-38 Gender wise Work Force Details

Town Work Force Total Male Percentage Female Percentage
Perundurai Workers 10620 6595 62.1 2549 24
Non 14310 5423 37.9 10876 76
Workers
Erode Workers 66140 41470 62.7 14352 21.7
Non 90961 33928 37.3 71222 78.3
Workers

4.12.11 Medical and Health Facilities

Table 4-39 presents the medical & health care facilities in the Erode district.

Table 4-39 Health care facilities in the Study Area

S.No Description Counts
1 District Hospitals 1
2 Sub divisional Hospitals-
4
Siddha
3 Municipal Hospital - Siddha 2
4 Government Hospital 2
5 Urban Health 2
6 Approved Nursing Homes 96
7 Nursing Homes 9
8 Siddha- PHC 21
9 Homoeopathy 1
10 CT Scan 1
(Source: www.tnhealth.org)

4.13 Environmental Setting

The ecologically significant systems within the study area of the project site are
listed and briefly discussed below:

a) Archaeological monuments:

The project location does not have significant archaeological monuments in

nearby 10 km radius.

b) Biological resources:

It was found that the project location is devoid of any endangered flora and
fauna within 10 km radius.

c) Core Zone of Biosphere Reserve/ Habitat for Migratory Birds

124
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

There is no biosphere reserve/habitat for migratory birds in the study area.

d) Lakes / Reservoirs / Dams

In the study area there are no major lakes, reservoirs and dams.

e) Sea / Estuary/ Mangroves

There is no sea/ estuary/ mangroves in the study area.

f) Cultural Monuments

This projectsite does not have significant cultural monuments in nearby 10km
radius.

4.14 Project Site Features

Features of the selected project sites are presented in the following table

Table 4.40 Site Environmental Features

Infrastructure Location and Environmental Site Photograph
Features

Lifting Station – 1 0.05 acres of vacant land belonging to

LS-1 at Town Panchayat (S.F.No.1006)in
Thoppupalayam Thoppupalayam ( Near Alamaram
(Near Alamaram Kovil) is proposed for constructing
Kovil) Lifting Station.

The site is covered partly with shrubs

and buses. The site is located away
from the commercial and residential
area. Also, the nearest receptor i.e.,
residential place lies at a distance of
250 m from the project site. The green
belt will be developed on the boundary
of the site.
It is located in zone 2 and components
of LS are Suction well (dia – 2.5 m &
depth – 3.83 m)
Lifting Station – 2 0.05 acres of vacant land belonging to
LS-2 at Town Panchayat (S.F.No.901/19) in
Beerangimedu Beerangimedu is proposed for
constructing Lifting Station.

The site is located on the road side.

The site is located away from the
commercial and residential area. Also,
the nearest receptor i.e., residential

125
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

place lies at a distance of 100 m from

the project site. The green belt will be
developed on the boundary of the site.
It is located in zone 2 and components
of LS are Suction well (dia – 2.5 m &
depth – 5.53 m)

Lifting Station – 3 0.05 acres of vacant land belonging to

LS-3 at Ashok nagar Town Panchayat (S.F.No.872/25) in
Ashok nagar is proposed for
constructing Lifting Station.

The site is located on the road side.

The site is located away from the
commercial and residential area. Also,
the nearest receptor i.e., residential
place lies at a distance of 100 m from
the project site.
The odour controlling device is
proposed in the site to mitigate the
odour problems/ issues. The green belt
will be developed on the boundary of
the site.
It is located in zone 2 and components
of LS are Suction well (dia – 2.5 m &
depth – 4.15 m)
Lifting Station – 4 0.05 acres of vacant land belonging to
LS-4 at Town Panchayat (S.F.No.338/18) in
Periyavettuvampalaya Periyavettuvampalayam is proposed
m for constructing Lifting Station.

The site is covered partly with shrubs

and buses. The site is located away
from the commercial and residential
area. Also, the nearest receptor i.e.,
residential place lies at a distance of
300 m from the project site. The green
belt will be developed on the boundary
of the site.
It is located in zone 3 and components
of LS are Suction well (dia – 2.5 m
&depth –5.65 m)

126
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Lifting Station – 5 0.05 acres of vacant land belonging to

LS - 5 at Town Panchayat (S.F.No.1025/7) in
Panikampalayam Panikampalayam is proposed for
constructing Lifting Station.

The site is located near by the

residential area. Also, the nearest
receptor i.e., residential place lies at a
distance of 50 m from the project site.
The green buffer will be proposed in
the site to mitigate the odour. The
green belt will be developed on the
boundary of the site.
It is located in zone 4 and components
of LS are Suction well
(dia – 2.0 m & depth – 3.85 m)
Lifting Station – 6 0.05 acres of vacant land belonging to
LS - 6 at Kuyavan Town Panchayat (S.F.No.792/2) in
kuttai. Kuyavankuttai is proposed for
constructing Lifting Station.

The site is located near by the

residential area. Also, the nearest
receptor i.e., residential place lies at a
distance of 50 m from the project site.
The green buffer will be proposed in
the site to mitigate the odour. The
green belt will be developed on the
boundary of the site.
It is located in zone 1 and components
of LS are Suction well
(dia – 3.3 m & depth – 6.28 m)
0.5 acres of Government poramboke
Main Pumping land of S.F.No.874/16 (Ayyarkulam)
Station available will be used to construct
MPS-I at Ayyarkulam Main Pumping Station. The land was
transferred to Town panchayat vide
GO No 407/Revenue(LD5(1)
Department) dated 17.10.2013. At
present the site is vacant and
surrounded by vacant land. The
nearest residential house lies at 100.0
m from the project site on the Eastern
and Southern side of project boundary.
It is proposed to construct Compound
wall for the entire site. Green buffer is
proposed to mitigate the Odour
problems. Also Odour control device
will be installed in site.

127
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

It is located in zone 1 and components

of MPS are Screen well (dia – 5.0 m &
depth – 5.87 m), Grit well (dia – 3.5 m
& depth – 6.75 m)and Collection well
(dia-6.5 m & depth- 8.57 m)
Main Pumping The proposed Main pumping station
Station - 2 was located at Panikampalayam
MPS-II at Compost yard (inside the STP site) in
Panikampalayam the Town Panchayat land extend of
Compost Yard 0.25 acre comprise S.F.No. 1032/2
The Site is located away
fromresidential and commercial areas.
The site is dumped with solid waste.
The nearest residential unit lies at
300m from the project site.
The Components of MPS are Screen
well (dia – 2.0 m & depth – 5.22 m),
Grit well (dia – 2.0 m & depth – 5.72
m)and Collection well (dia-2.0 m &
depth- 6.85 m) and located in Zone 4.
Sub-Pumping Station 0.1 acre of State Highways comprises
SPS-I at Survey No. 533 available in
Chinnavettuvampalay Chinnavettuvampalayam will be used to
am construct Sub- Pumping Station for
Zone-3.
The proposed site is vacant & covered
with shrubs and bushes, it is located far
away from the residential area and
industries. The residential lies at distance
of 290.0m from the project site. The site
has ample space and green buffer will be
developed all around the site.
The Components of SPS are Screen well
(dia – 3.5 m & depth -5.56), Grit well (dia
– 2.0 m & depth – 6.96 m) and Collection
well (dia-5.0 m & depth-7.67 m)

Sub-Pumping Station The proposed Sub- pumping station was

SPS-II at located at Chennivalsu in the Revenue
Chennivalasu land extend of 0.2 acre comprise S.F.No.
925/3 and located in Zone-2.
Site is located within a developed
neighborhood with residential and
commercial buildings. The nearest
residential unit lies at 30m to the southern
side from the project site. However, the
site is large and SPS will be located
within the site maintaining maximum
buffer with residential buildings.
However, the odour controlling device
will be installed in site.
The Components of SPS are Screen well

128
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

(dia – 3.5 m & depth -5.56), Grit well (dia

– 2.0 m & depth – 6.96 m) and Collection
well (dia-5.0 m & depth-7.67 m)
Sewage Treatment About 2.5 acres (S.F.No. 1032/2) of
Plant (3.14 MLD) at Town panchayatcompost yard
panikampalayam available at panikampalayam will be
Compost yard used to construct STP. This site
dumped with soild waste, site is far
away from the residential and
commercial development. This STP is
proposed to treat the sewage from
Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4. The residential
settlements are far away from the
proposed STP (300m).The green belt
In initial Stage
will be developed on the boundary of
the site.
The Sewage treated water will be
disposed into near by kuttai from
where the overflow flows nearby odai.
A pipeline of length 50m will be
constructed from the outlet of
proposed STP upto the kuttai.
At present
Outfall from STP in It is proposed to discharge the treated
Panikampalayam water from STP into the nearby kuttai
through the proposed pipeline for a
distance of 50m from the STP. The
outfall channel is connected to odai at
distance of 200m. The width and depth
of kuttai is 100m and 5.0m
respectively.
The capacity of STP at
Panikampalayam is 3.14 MLD. The
maximum daily discharge from the
STP into the channel in the ultimate
year is 3.14 MLD.
Thus, the channel has the adequate
capacity to take the treated water from
STP during monsoon and non-
monsoon periods. Also, the channel
does not have encroachments and
household in the downstream.
As per the TNPCB NOC letter, the
treated sewage will be planned for
irrigation.
However, a proposal for the use of
treated water for irrigation in the
nearby future is made.

129
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Collection System Sewer lines will be laid in the centre

of road by cutting black top, within
the road right of way. In wider roads,
like SH, NH, divided 2-way roads etc.,
sewers will be laid along the edge of
the road, but mostly within the black
top portion. In the outskirts where
adequate land in the road shoulder is
available along the blacktop and is
clear of any structures or activities,
pipes will be laid in this earthen
shoulder.

Figure 4-19Satellite Image for Treated Effluent Disposal Point from STP

130
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

4.15 Raw Sewage Characteristics

The sewage collected from various chambers is almost of same type. The domestic
wastewater from the local residential area constitutes the raw sewage. The
wastewater characterization is presented in Table 4-41.

Table 4-41 Raw Sewage Characteristics

S.No Parameter Values Unit of
measurement
1 Biological Oxygen Demand 280 Mg/l
2 Chemical Oxygen Demand 540 Mg/l
3 Total suspended solids 564 Mg/l
4 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 61 Mg/l
5 Ammonia Nitrogen (as N) 50 Mg/l
6 Total Phosphorous 5 Mg/l
7 Sulphate 288 Mg/l
8 Fecal Coliform 10⁶ MPN/100ml
9 Total Coliform 10⁷ MPN/100ml
10. Chlorides 1799 Mg/l
11 pH 7.58 -
12 Oil and grease 50 Mg/l

4.16 Treated Effluent Quality

The STP will be designed in such a way that the treated effluent quality attains the
limits or even better so as to attain the standards well below given by the Pollution
Control Board. The parameters to be monitored and to maintain within limits are
presented in Table 4-42.

Table 4-42 Treated Effluent Quality

S.No Parameter Values Unit of
measurement
1 Biological Oxygen Not more than 10 Mg/l
Demand
2 Total suspended solids Not more than 20 Mg/1
3 Chemical oxygen Not more than 50 Mg/l
Demand
4 pH 6.5-9

131
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

5 Oil and grease Less than or Mg/l

Equal to 5 mg/l
6 NH4-N Not more than 5 Mg/l
7 Nitrate Nitrogen as NO₃ 5 or less Mg/l
8 Total Phosphorous 5 or less Mg/l

Table-4-43 Salient features of the proposed STP site

S. No Particulars Details
1. Latitude 11.255402 to 11.280655 N
2. Longitude 77.574283 to 77.592307 E
3. Site Elevation above MSL 292 m above MSL
Land Available for proposed
4. 2.5 Acres
project
5. Proposed STP Capacity 3.14 MLD
6. Technology Used Fluidized Aerobic Bio Reactor Technology (FAB)
 NH 544 (Salem –Kochi) ≃ 4.3 Km
7. Nearest Highway  SH 96 (Erode- Perundurai - kangeyam)≃ 2.32 Km
 NH47(Salem – Coimbatore)≃ 2.10 Km
8. Nearest Railway station  Perunthurai Railway Station ≃ 3.89 km (E)
9. Nearest Airport  Coimbatore Airport ≃ 65.63 km (WSW)

5 PREDICTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

5.1 INTRODUCTION

When identifying the potential impacts of a new project on the existing

environment, such as the proposed Sewage Treatment Plant situated at
Pannikkampalayam, Perundurai. Construction of sewer line with sewage

132
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

treatment plant and there after operation of this system, if undertaken without a
proper understanding of the relationships inherent in environmental function, can
be accompanied by disruptions to the environment, from which it may take a long
time to regain equilibrium. In human terms, this may mean that generations must
function in a debilitated environment and suffer many possible associated socio-
economic hardships and financial losses.

Some of the major environmental impacts of sewerage system include damage to

local ecosystems, loss of productive agricultural lands, demographic change,
accelerated urbanization, and introduction of disease. The need of development
and growth in the area must be matched with the conservation of the existing
natural resources.

In general, construction of a new sewage treatment plant will have a positive

environmental impact on the town. It is expected to produce a long term
improvement in public health of the residents, as well as to significantly reduce a
source of chronic water pollution of an ecologically valuable portion if the water
body where the sewerage drains.

5.2 IMPACT EVALUATION

5.2.1 Air Quality

This section presents an assessment of air quality impacts associated with the
construction and operation of the proposed STP activity at Perundurai Town
Panchayat, Erode District, and Tamil Nadu. Major sources of air pollution have
been identified namely construction dust emission and road traffic emissions.
The sources of air pollutants at the different phases of the development are
categorized as follows;

 Construction Phase: Construction works include site clearance, site

formation, STP units & administration building works. The major
temporary air pollution is dust generated as a result of these construction
works. Cutting and welding operation, loading-unloading operation is
mainly responsible for the release of PM, SO 2, NOx, CO etc. However the
overall impact may be rated as direct, short-term, adverse, and reversible.

133
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME
CHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 Operational Phase:
Phase:The
The primary emission sources during the operations
phase would include compressor and pumping station operations,
vehicular traffic, carbon dioxide and a smalll quantity of Hydrogen
sulphide may be produced in Aerobic Tank.

5.2.2 Noise Quality

The noise quality around the proposed site is under the permissible limit.

 Construction Phase: The construction of the proposed sewage treatment

plant may generate noise during the constructional phase due to activities
of loading,, unloading of material handling and machine operation
equipment & vehicular movement. Impact of noise level may be
categorized as direct, short-term,
short adverse, reversible and of low to
moderate magnitude.

 Operational Phase: The main sources of noise during the operations

phase would include compressor and pumping station, and vehicle traffic.
The noise levels from the pumping stations may between 64 - 86 dB(A) or
between 58 - 75 dB
dB(A) at about 1 kilometerfrom the station. Other noise
pollution during operation would be generated by other mechanical
equipment, and sludge dewatering units. DG will also be a source of noise
generation.

5.2.3 Odour Problems

 Operation Phase - Inlet chamber, grit channels, screening and grit

handling, aeration tanks, and sludge holding and dewatering units are the
main sources of odour
odo at the Sewage treatment plant.

5.2.4 Water Quality

 Construction Phase -The construction of the proposed

posed sewage
treatment plant will facilitate improvement of water quality in and
around the site by avoiding the unhygienic disposal of the raw sewage in
the vicinity.
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 Operation Phase -There will not be any adverse impact on the ground
water quality since the treated effluent will be within the standards
prescribed by the CPCB / TNPCB.

5.2.5 Solid Waste Handling

 Construction Phase - Solid waste generated during site preparation and

construction work would include cut vegetation and typical construction
waste (Ex. wasted concrete, steel, wooden scaffolding and forms, bags,
waste earth materials, etc,). This waste would negatively impact the site
and surrounding environment if not properly managed and disposed of at
an approved dumpsite.

 Operation Phase – Grit, screenings and the sludge generatedfrom the

treatment plant will be the major source of solid waste generation.

5.2.6 Cultural and Socio-Economic Impacts

 The construction of proposed sewage treatment plant is a mark beneficial

socio-economic aspect since it leads to safe and hygienic disposal of the
treated effluent.

 It enhances the existing environment as the untreated raw sewage

disposal will be ceased.

 Also, the project will provide employment to the people during the
constructional and operational phase hence creating a positive impact
due to this project.

5.2.7 Outfall location and design

 The treated sewage is disposed to the nearestkuttai50m away from the

site.

 As the sewage is discharged after treatment, the treated sewage quality

will be within the standards prescribed by CPCB/TNPCB.

 Since the quantity of treated sewage is huge, there can be flooding of the
nearest kuttai and the same may flow into the odai and reaches a large

135
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

kuttai near chennimalaipalayam which has the carrying capacity of 5000

ML.

5.2.8 Existing utility services

The road opening activities may damage the underground water pipelines or
electricity poles in the vicinity of the site for the proposed sub-projects. This will lead to
water supply interruptions, disruption in electricity supply and will involve expensive
repair costs.

5.3 Proposed Mitigation Measures

5.3.1 Air Quality

 The fugitive emissions and dust from the proposed site during
construction phase can be reduced by sprinkling of water.

 The release of volatile organic compound, Carbon di-oxide and H 2S may

take place during the operational phase which will be mitigated by
implementing Environmental Management Plan.

 The power requirement during the operation of STP will be 13.5

KVA/dayDG sets are operated only during power failures and the D.G sets
are proposed to provide 20 KVA as required suitable power back up to
run the plant. The emissions from the D.G sets will have marginal impact
on the existing air quality, however adequate Stack height of 5m will be
provided as per the CPCB norms to combat the effect on the air quality
and also to facilitate proper dispersion.

 Steps will be taken to create environmental awareness for the commuters

so that the vehicles will be maintained properly in turn will not have any
impact due to the vehicular emissions.

5.3.2 Noise Quality

a) Collection System and Pumping Stations
Operation of pumps and motors and diesel generators is a major source of noise.The
Pumpsets proposed are submersible with the maximum capacity of 25 HP. As the

136
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

pumping stations are located in the residential areas, with few located very close to the
houses, noise generated from pump stations can have continuous negative impacts on the
surrounding population. Internal noise level in a room measured at a distance of 1m from
these pump sources typically will be in the range of 80 dB(A) to 100 dB(A).

 Procure good quality latest technology high pressure pumps that guarantee
controlled noise at a level of around 80 dB(A) at a distance of 1meter.
 (ii) Use appropriate building materials and construction techniques for sewage
pumping stations which can absorb sound rather than reflect noise.
 (iv) Procure only CPCB approved generators to meet air emission and noise level
requirements.
 (v) Provide sound mufflers for ventilators in the plant rooms; and sound proof
doors
 (vi) Provide ear plugs designated for noise reduction to workers. Those working in
enclosed areas or adjacent to continuous running equipment should be provided
with proper noise attenuating equipment.

b) Sewage Treatment Plant

 It can be mitigated by restricting the vehicular movement only during the day
time.

 Noise problems shall be reduced to normally acceptable levels by incorporating

low-noise equipment in the design and/or locating such mechanical equipment in
properly acoustically lined buildings or enclosures.

 Acoustic enclosures will be provided for DG.

 Greenbelt is proposed along the periphery of the site which helps in reducing the
noise levels.

 Adequate care will be taken to maintain the noise levels within the prescribed
limits by providing ear muffs to the workers.

 The nearest residential development is about 0.5 km from the periphery of the STP
and the sensitive areas such as temple and school are located at a distance of more
than 2 km. The attenuation by the proposed greenbelt will be more than the
adequate to maintain the noise level well within the prescribed standards by
CPCB/TNPCB.

137
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

5.3.3 Odour Problems

a) PUMPING STATIONS/Lifting Stations :
All the pumping stations are away by minimum 50m from the residences /
Sensitive receptors.

Measures proposed for Odour control from Lifting stations/Pumping stations:

 Continous operation with power back up

 Every day removal of Grit and screens.

 Green belt around the Pumping stations.

 In addition to the above odour monitoring will be carried out during Operation and
Maintenance and if need arises other odour control measures like Mechanical
methods will be examined and be provided.

b) Sewage Treatment Plant

 Odor can be reduced or prevented through continuous process of the operation. The
grit and screenings will be cleaned twice a day to facilitate normal flow of the water.
The sludge developed in Clarifier and Aeration tank will be removed and part re-
circulated to maintain the MLSS around 3000 mg/L as per field requirements.

 Surplus sludge will be pumped to the Sludge digester and to the Centrifuge for
making Sludge cakes and subsequent disposal to the Compost yard.

 Storage of sludge in the STP site will be avoided and be periodically removed.

 Thick shrubs and the trees along the periphery and in between the STP units will
help in mitigating the odor from the site.

 Fly and Mosquito breeding is not envisaged since there will not be any stagnation of
water inside the plant area.

 The odour impacts to the community are expected to be minimal. There is no

significant habitation around the proposed site and there will not be any impact.

5.3.4 Water Quality and Disposal

a) Network and Pumping Stations

138
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 Adequate care will be taken to the leakages in the plant and leak proof joints are
already proposed for the construction.

 All the structure constructed with M30 concrete which is leak proof.

 Continous operation will be ensured to prevent overflow at Pumping stations.

 All earthworks be conducted during the dry season to prevent the problem of
soil/silt run-off during rains

 Avoid stockpiling of earth fill especially during the monsoon season unless covered
by tarpaulins or plastic sheets; do not stock earth/material close to water bodies

 Prioritize re-use of excess spoils and materials in the construction works. If spoils
will be disposed, only designated disposal areas shall be used;

 Install temporary silt traps or sedimentation basins along the drainage leading to
the water bodies;

 Place storage areas for fuels and lubricants away from any drainage leading to
water bodies; these should be at least 100 m away from water bodies and
groundwater wells

 Store fuel, construction chemicals etc., on an impervious floor, also avoid spillage
by careful handling; provide spill collection sets for effective spill management

 Dispose any wastes generated by construction activities in designated sites

 Conduct surface quality inspection according to the Environmental Management

Plan (EMP).

b) Sewage Treatment Plant

 Adequate care will be taken to the leakages in the plant and leak proof joints are
already proposed for the construction.

 All piping inside the plant will be cast iron double flanged. All pipe work and fittings
will be a class rating in excess of the maximum pressure attained in service
including any surge pressure.

139
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 All underground-buried piping will be protected by the application of hot coal tar
enamel and fiberglass wrapping. The coating will consist of one coal tar primer one
coat, wrapping of fiber glass one more coat of enamel and the final wrap of enamel
impregnated fiber glass.

 All sanitary piping will be of UPVC class 4 suitably buried below the ground with a
sand cushion of 20 cm all round. The pipes will painted with two coats of
anticorrosive bit mastic paint.

 The drained water will be sent back to the inlet for treatment through pipelines.

 Administrative building, chlorine tonner and centrifuge house are provided with
rain water harvesting facilities. Pipe culverts will be provided at road crossings for
storm water drainage of the area at the required number of places.

 There will not be any impact on the nearby drainage canal downstream usage.
However as mentioned above the quality of the treated effluent will meet the
standards prescribed by the Central and State pollution control Boards.

 There are few surface water bodies (Chennimalaipalayam lake)located at around

2.0 Km from the site, which will carry water during rainy season only. There will not
be any impact due to the proposed STP. To prevent flooding of the disposal to
Kuttai, the pipeline should be conveyed at different locations of the site, covering
the entire area with an approximate interval of 50m within the disposal site. This
will ensure proper dispersion of water and prevent flooding.The carrying capacity
of the kuttai near the STP site is nearly 300 ML and then the overflowing water goes
through an odai and reaches a large kuttai at Chennimalaipalayam which has
carrying capacity of 5000 ML. In the end route there are agricultural fields, the
farmers utilizing the water from odai.

 During operation phase the sewagefrom administration building will be taken to

STP. After treated the sewage, the waste will be sent to septic tank which will be
cleaned regularly.

 All the structure constructed with M30 concrete which is leak proof.

 Continous operation will be ensured to prevent any discharge of Untreated effluent

140
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

5.3.5 Soil Quality

 Top soils shall be stockpiled to a height of 400 mm in pre – designated areas for
preservation and shall be reapplied to site during plantation of the proposed
vegetation.

 Top soil shall be separated from sub-soil debris and stones larger than 50 mm
diameter. So that, the soil erosion can be prevented and proper construction
procedure will be done.

 Heavy metal analysis should be done for disposal site once in 3 months.

5.3.6 Solid Waste Handling

a) Network and Pumping Stations
Accumulation of silt in sewers in areas of low over time, overflows, blockages, power
outages, harmful working conditions for the workers cleaning sewers etc. are some of the
issues that are taken into consideration during the sewer system design. Measures such
as the following are included in sewer system design to ensure that the system provides
the benefits as intended:

 Limit the sewer depth where possible

 Sewers shall be laid away from water supply lines and drains (at least 1 m,
wherever possible)

 In all cases, the sewer line should be laid deeper than the water pipeline (the
difference between top of the sewer and bottom of water pipeline should be at least
300 mm)

 In unavoidable cases, where sewers are to be laid close to storm water drains,
appropriate pipe material shall be selected (stoneware pipes shall be avoided).

 For shallower sewers and especially in narrow roads, use small inspection
chambers in lieu of manholes; Design manhole covers to withstand anticipated
loads and ensure that the covers can be readily replaced if broken to minimize
silt/garbage entry.

 Ensure sufficient hydraulic capacity to accommodate peak flows and adequate slope
in gravity mains to prevent build-up of solids and hydrogen sulfide generation.

141
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

a) Sewage Treatment Plant

 Grit and screenings will be immediately removed and taken to Town Panchayat
solid waste dump site in consultation with the Town panchayat.

 The sludge from the Treatment Plant shall be collected in a sludge sump where it is
aerated continuously for mixing. The aerated sludge shall be treated through
mechanical dewatering system by aeration, digestion and thickening.

 Before dewatering, the sludge shall be aerated and polyelectrolyte is to be added for
best settlement of sludge.

 The sludge cake from the centrifuge pump will be moved to the composting yard
through trucks.

 During transportation sludge will be covered in tarpaulin sheets.

 The sludge will be removed at frequent intervals in order to avoid accumulation

inside the site.

5.3.7 Mitigation measures for Existing Utility Services

 Identify the common utilities to be affected such as: telephone cables. Electric cables,
electric poles, water pipelines, public tabs, etc.
 Affected utilities shall be relocated with prior approval of the concerned agencies
before construction starts.
 Provide advance notice (not less than 10 working days) to affected parties. The
advance notice shall be in the form of written notice and a grievance redressal cell
shall be established for timely addressing of grievances.
5.3.8 Health and Safety
Safety during Construction
 Adequate precautions to be taken to prevent the accidents and from the machineries. All
machines used will conform to the relevant Indian Standards Code and will be regularly
inspected by the TWAD.
 Shoring and Strutting will be provided to avoid the collapse of the soil in case of loose
soil.
 Barricading of Construction Site / Manholes atall times in a day with adequate signage.

142
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 Protective footwear and protective goggles to all workers employed on mixing of

materials like cement, concrete etc.
 Welder’s protective eye-shields will be provided to workers’ who are engaged in
welding works.
 Earplugs will be provided to workers exposed to loud noise, and workers working in
crushing, compaction, or concrete mixing operation.
 The contractor will supply all necessary safety appliances such as safety goggles,
helmets, safety belts, ear plugs, mask etc to workers and staffs.
 The contractor will comply with all the precautions as required for ensuring the safety
of the workmen as per the International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No.62
as far as those are applicable to this contract.
 The contractor will make sure that during the construction work all relevant provisions
of the Factories Act, 1948 and the Building and other Construction Workers (regulation
of Employment and Conditions of Services) Act, 1996 and adhered to.
 The contractor will not employ any person below the age of 18 years for any work and
no woman will be employed on the work of painting with products containing lead in
any form.
Safety during Operation
 The STP, and pumping stations are provided with compound wall of height 3.0m and
fencing will be provided in lifting stations for safety purpose.
 The structures will be provided with easy access ladders, and handrails,
interconnections between all units with proper safe walkway platforms for movement to
avoid falling of human and materials. Electrical cables are laid in cable trenches. Open
spaces at height will be covered with parapet walls and handrails.
 The necessary safety measures for the storage and usage of Chlorine will be provided.
The chlorine leak detectors will be provided to identify the leakage for immediate
remedial actions.
 The emergency repair kit, Personal safety kit like full body cover, Oxygen kit for
breathing, face mask, body shower and eye washers would be provided. For all these
measures requiring separate items, and for those above in other sections cost provided
in the table for EMP cost estimate.
Electrical Safety Provisions

143
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 Electrical design is done based on the standard practice with all relevance to
IEE/IEC/IS standards. All equipment proposed are well advanced.
 Electrical control system for STP is mostly automatic with adoption of PLC system. The
one point control given advantage of optimum supervision of the whole system with data
logging facility.
 PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) of STP is linked to process control also.
 Drive motors are of TEFC (Totally Enclosed, Fan Cooled) all weather proof. Up to 5 HP
the drive controls are proposed with Direct On Line (DOL) starters from 5 HP to 25 HP
it is through star/delta starters. Further beyond 25 HP rated motors drive controls is
through soft starters.
 These will save more energy, reduce the starting current of the motor and reduce the
strain on the motors.
 The PLC and its software interface controls flawlessly the drives to the intended
programmed chalked with the process technology and stream route sequence and other
requirements during the complete process.
 Each drive will have a standby to maneuver failures if any and to give relief for other
motor.
 The system as whole will have manual operation option also from one point or from
drive locations itself. These statutory from the view of safety and emergencies.
Emergency stop push button stations are provided for all drive points with lockable
arrangements for meeting all emergencies.
 For maintaining energy efficiency, the power system will be assisted by static capacitor
banks with auto controls so that the power factor shall be maintained at 0.95 PF and
optimum energy efficiency is achieved. These capacitor banks are located on LT side of
the electrical distribution system.
 Cables are proposed to interconnecting the drives and motors. XLPE (Cross linked Poly
Ethylene) cables conforming to IS:1554 has been proposed. Minimum size of the cable
is restricted to 4mm2 to provide mechanical safety and avoid future breakages.
 For control loops and PLC loops 2.5 mm2 copper multi core cables are adopted.
 A mimic panel interfaced with the power and control system gives the status indications
of all the drives and associated process controls at a glance in the control room. This is
an illuminated board with painted process flow diagram and drive locations.

144
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 A separate panel has been proposed for each Lifting and Pumping station with an
independent DG set for an emergency supply of the rating shown in the SLD. The
supply for all the Lifting and Pumping stations shall be taken from Electricity Board
source.
 Double earthing system is adopted for providing better equipment safety using GI strips
for more than 7.5 HP drives and 8G GI wire for lesser rated drives. The earth stations
proposed are of conventional type with 50 mm GI pipe as per 3043-1987. Copper Plate
earthing has been proposed for transformer and DG neutral earthing.
 Outdoor and Indoor lighting are planned to give good light at all the area and in
particular at drive/inspection points. These are timer controlled with manual operation
option. Street lights are metal halide type mounted on tubular points of 5.0 m height. As
a statutory requirement 10% of street lights shall be solar operated lamps.
Training for Operation staff

Periodical training would be provided to the staffs and operators involved in the
STP Operation, O&M, Chemical Handling, Emergency, Line Maintenance, Valve
Operations, Electrical & Mechanical Operations, Cleaning Of Pumping And Lifting
Stations.
Facility for Workers

Basic facilities such as toilet, drinking water, electricity health, eye shower, first
aid facility and safety gadgets, personal protective equipments (Safety Glasses, Splash-
proof Goggles, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Safety Shoes or Boots and Respirators)for
chemicals and sludge handling will be provided at the Treatment Plant.
Other item of safety equipment should include

(a) First aid kits (b) stretchers (c) fire extinguishers, (d) Gas and fire alarms, (e) portable
combustible gas indicators, (f) hose and gas makes, (g) emergency portable lights, (h) an
oxygen efficiency indicator.
5.3.9 Green Belt Development

With a view to mitigate the adverse environmental effect on surroundings

and to provide an environmental cover from emissions, green belts are developed
in and around the project site.

145
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

The main objective of the green belt is to provide a barrier between the source of
pollution and the surrounding areas. The green belt helps to capture the emission
and to attenuate the noise generated apart from improving the aesthetics.
Development of green belt and other forms of greenery shall also prevent soil
erosion and washing away of topsoil besides helping in stabilizing the functional
ecosystem, make the climate more conducive and restore water balance. The area
along the plant boundaries shall be used to plant various trees and shrubs. While
making choice of plant species for cultivation in green belts, importance has to be
given to the natural factor of bio-climate. It is also presumed that the selected
plants will be grown as per normal horticultural (or forestry) practice given above
and authorities responsible for plantation will also make adequate provision for
watering and protection of the saplings.

Total area of 1155 m2 is proposed for green belt development. The area is 15 to 25
m on each side of the proposed STP.

Approximately, 46 trees can be grown in the area with a distance of 5 m between

each tree. No. of saplings required would be around 50

The main purpose of green belt development is to contribute to the following

factors:

 To attenuate noise level generated from the plant;

 To improve the aesthetics of the plant area;
 To trap the vehicular and fugitive dust emissions;
 To act as a pollution sink for gaseous emissions;
 To maintain ecological balances;
 To prevent soil erosion and to protect the natural vegetation;
 To utilize the treated effluents.

Table 5-1Trees proposed for Green Belt Development

S.No Botanical Family Common Vern. Name Habitat Tree
Name Name Height
Trees
1. Acacia Fabaceae Australian Pencil maram Evergreen 15-30 m
auriculiformis Wattle

146
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

2. Azardirachta Meliaceae Neem Vembu Semi 15-20 m

inidca Deciduous
3. Bambus Poaceae Bamboo Moongil Evergreen 30 m
bambos
4. Bawhinia Fabaceae Mountain Sivappu Deciduous 10-12 m
variegate Ebony mandharai
5. Borassus Arecaceae Palmyra Panaimaram Evergreen 30 m
flabellifer palm
6. Cassia fistula Fabaceae Amaltas Sarakkondrai Deciduous 10-20 m
7. Cassia Fabaceae Red Cassia Senkondrai Evergreen 10-20 m
roxburghii
8. Millingtonia Bignoniaceae Indian cork Maramalligai Evergreen 18-25 m
hortensis tree
9. Mimusops Sapotaceae Maulsari Magizhamaram Evergreen 9-18 m
elengi
10. Muntingia muntingiaceae Jamaica Seeni pala Evergreen 7-12 m
calabura cherry maram
11. Couropita Lecythidaceae Cannon Ball Naagalingamar Evergreen Upto 35
guianensis Tree am m
12. Eucalyptus Myrtaceae Forest red Thaiyalam Evergreen 20–50 m
tereticornis gum
13. Vitex negundo Lamiaceae Chinese Nochi Evergreen -
Chaste tree
14. Pongamia Fabaceae Indian beech Pungai Evergreen -
pinnata L.
Shrubs (Ornamental plants)
15. Hibiscus rosa Malvaceae Rose mallow Sembaruthi - 1.5-3m
sinensis
16. Ixora Rubiaceae Jungle flame - - -
singaporensis
17. Nerium Apocynanceae Oleander Arali - 2-6 m
oleander
18. Tecoma stans Bignoniaceae Yellow bells Manjarali - -
19. Ocimum Lamiaceae Indian basil Tulasi - 30-60
tenuiflorum cm

147
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Figure 5.1 – STP Layout with Green Belt

148
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Figure 5.2 – Pumping Station Layout with Green Belt

5.3.10 Energy Efficiency

Project area is mostly plain and gently sloping ground, it is therefore not technically
feasible or economical to design a completely gravity system to collect sewage from
individual houses and transfer the same the STP on the outskirts of the city. It
necessitated provision of pumping stations, which are optimized to the extent possible to
minimize the overall pumping. In the current design, sewage will be collected from the
houses via sewer network and conveyed by gravity to the pumping station. From the Sub
pumping station, collected sewage will be pumped into Main Pumping station and
subsequently from Main pumping station accumulated sewage will be pumped into the
designated sewage treatment plant. This optimized the energy consumption.
To optimize the power consumption, the hydraulic design shall follow optimal
approach, and the following also considered in design and selection of pumping systems.
According to Manual for the Development of Municipal Energy Efficiency Projects in India
(jointly developed by Beaurau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) and International Finance
Corporation in 2008), energy savings, at minimum, of 25% to 40% is possible with
appropriate measures. The following measures shall be considered and incorporated into
the project designs:

 Using low-noise and energy efficient pumping systems

 Efficient Pumping system operation

 Installation of Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs)

 Ensuring maintenance of high power factor through use of Capacitor Banks

 By providing Green belt around the Lifting stations, Pumping stations and STP the
carbon content released may be controlled.

 By using the treated water for irrigation purpose helps to reduce the use of Ground
water for irrigation.

149
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

6 PUBLIC CONSULTATION

As part of the UGSS to Perundurai Town Panchayat, STP of capacity 3.14 MLD (base
year) was proposed at Panikampalayam, adjacent to solid waste dumping yard. Based
on the instruction of the Executive Engineer, TWAD Board, Erode,| there is no alternate
site selected for this project. The finalized site Sy.No: 1032/2 for a total area of 2.5
Acres.

It was envisaged that the treated water could be used for irrigation purpose in nearby
villages.

The public consultation was conducted at PerunduraiTown Panchayaton 16.05.2018.

150
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

151
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

152
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

153
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

154
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

7. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

7.1 INTRODUCTION

Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is aimed at mitigating the possible

adverse impact of a project and ensuring the existing environmental quality. The
EMP converse all aspects of planning, construction and operation of the project
relevant to environment. It is essential to implement the EMP right from the
planning stage continuing throughout the construction and operation stage.
Therefore the main purpose of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is to
identify the project specific activities that would have to be considered for the
significant adverse impacts and the mitigation measure required.

7.2 Environmental Management Plan

Environmental Management Plan (EMP) during Pre – Construction,

Construction and operation Phase is given under Table 7.1.

Table 7.2 : Environmental Management Plan for Pre- Construction, Construction and
Operation
Potential Responsible
S. No Negative Mitigation Measures Time frame agencies
Impacts
Pre – Construction
1 Clearances TNPCB, Highway & Railway Before start TWAD
Department clearance and labour of
working license required during construction
construction will be ensured and
made available before start of work.
Permissions will be obtained from
the concerned authority.
2 Utility Common utilities to be affected such Before start TWAD Board
Relocation as: telephone cables, electric cables, of / Contractor
electric poles, water pipelines, public construction
water taps etc. will be identified and
will be relocated with prior approval
of the concerned agencies before
construction starts
3 Storage of Temporary use of land for Before start TWAD Board
materials construction sites / storage of of / Contractor
construction materials done at sites construction
identified by the contractor.
4 Tree Tree plantation is proposed for STP During TWAD Board
Plantation and Main pumping station. If any Construction / Contractor

155
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

tree cutting activity in project site,

Compensatory plantation will be 10
times to the number of trees bring
cut.
Construction Phase
1 Design Design process to meet the CPCB During
of Proposed disposal standards of inland water Construction TWAD Board
STP disposal including: BOD: less than / Contractor
15 mg/l, suspended solids less than
20 mg/l, Faecal coliform less than
200/100 ml
 Ensuring continuous
uninterrupted power supply,
including a back-up facility (such
as generator)
 Providing operating manual with
all standard operating procedures
(SOPs) for operation and
maintenance of the facility
 Necessary training to ULB staff
dealing with STP.
 Extended contractor period for O
and M, proper transfer of facility
to ULB with adequate technical
know-how on O and M and
hands-on training to ULB staff
 Prepare sludge management plan
to ensure safe collection, adequate
treatment prior to reuse / disposal
 Conduct periodic testing of sludge
to check its quality according to
set standards for reuse as
manure/soil conditioner
 Provide training on safe handling
of sludge, along with proper
apparatus and personnel
protection equipment (PPEs) to
workers
 Providing green belt for
reduction of odour and noise.
2 Baseline Adequate measures will be taken and During TWAD
parameters checked to control the Baseline Construction
parameters of Air, Water and Noise
pollution. Base line parameters
recorded will be used for monitoring
and conformance be ensured.
3 Construction Contractor will follow all relevant During Contractor
of labour provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 construction
camps and the Building and the other

156
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Construction Workers (Regulation of

Employment and Conditions of
Service) Act, 1996 for construction
and maintenance of labour camp).
 The location, layout and basic
facility provision of each labour
camp will be submitted to
Engineer prior to their
construction.
 The construction will commence
only upon the written approval of
the Engineer.
 The contractor will maintain
necessary living accommodation
and ancillary facilities in
functional and hygienic manner
and as approved by the Engineer.
 All temporary accommodation
must be constructed and
maintained in such a fashion that
uncontaminated water is
available for drinking, cooking
and washing. The sewage
system for the camp must be
planned. Adequate health care is
to be provided for the work
force. The layout of the
construction camp and details of
the facilities provided will be
prepared and will be approved by
the Engineer.
 Awareness about HIV/AIDS will
be provided, grievance Redressal
mechanism for the camps.
4 Sewer Limit the sewer depth where During TWAD
network possible Construction
 Sewers shall be laid away from
water supply lines and drains (at
least 1 m, wherever possible);
 In all cases, the sewer line
should be laid deeper than the
water pipeline (the difference
between top of the sewer and
bottom of water pipeline should
be at least 300 mm)
 For shallower sewers and
especially in narrow roads, use
small inspection chambers in
lieu of manholes;

157
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 Design manhole covers to

withstand anticipated loads and
ensure that the covers can be
readily replaced if broken to
minimize silt/garbage entry
 Ensure sufficient hydraulic
capacity to accommodate peak
flows and adequate slope in
gravity mains to prevent buildup
of solids and hydrogen sulfide
generation
5 Pumping  Provision of passive gas During TWAD
stations ventilation arrangement by Construction
providing a take-off vent from
top of well by positioning vent
in such a way that cover slab
fitment / movement / drawl if
required for maintenance
purposes is not compromised.
 Height of vent to be provided
appropriately and a minimum 2
m above the lintel level (top
level) of window(s) /
passageways / doors in the
nearby adjoining buildings.
 Provision of odor control /
mitigation system as per site
conditions / requirements
 Compound wall of 2.0 m height
shall be provided
 Submersible sewage pumps of
suitable rating, minimum
submergence requirements,
open impeller with cutting-
tearing arrangement and high
strength-corrosion resistant
heavy duty construction shall be
proposed.
 Provide training to the staff in
emergency procedures and
Conduct periodic H2S
monitoring.
 Level control sensor will be
provided for the continuous
flow of sewage in pumping
stations.

158
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

6 Sewage lifting  Provide closed wells fitted with During TWAD

stations necessary ventilation and odor Construction
abatement systems such as GAC
air filters fitted to the ventilation
shaft outlet(s).
 Level control sensor will be
provided for the continuous
flow of sewage in lifting
stations.
 Using low-noise and energy
efficient pumping systems
 Efficient Pumping system
operation
 Installation of Variable
Frequency Drives (VFDs)
7 Disposal of A suitable site identified for safe Pre- Contractor
construction disposal, in low lying areas within construction
debris and the project area as approved by the and
excavated Engineer in charge and to other low Construction
materials lying area in consultation with local
body.
8 Protection of The top soil to be protected and During Contractor
top soil compacted after completion of work, construction
where the pipelines run, including
open lands and agricultural lands.
9 Laying of Adequate precautions should be During TWAD/Contractor
sewer system taken while laying the sewer lines to Construction
avoid the possibility of cross
connection with water supply lines.
Pipes should be laid as per IS
specifications and joints leak proof
to prevent seepage. Water Supply
line (bottom of pipe) crossing to be
0.5 m above sewer line.
10 Temporary Proper drainage arrangements to be During TWAD/Contractor
flooding due made in consultation with the Construction
to excavation. Engineer in charge, to avoid the
overflowing of existing drains due to
excavation during the laying of
sewer mains
11 Using of Usage of Modern machineries to During Contractor
modern minimize construction period and its construction
machineries impacts.
12 Laying of Sewer crossing a water line should During Contractor
Pumping main be laid 0.5 m below bottom of WS construction
line. Joining the pipes and pressure
test to ensure strength of pipes to
avoid soil contamination due to

159
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

seepage of sewage. Any shifting of

cable should be attended with
minimum period of disturbance.
Provision of temporary crossings /
bridges across the trench wherever
necessary to facilitate normal life
and business.
13 Planning of The activities are limited to the During Contractor
temporary project sites and right of way. Hence construction
traffic does not require any traffic
arrangements arrangements. In case of any need in
the site, necessary permissions for
temporary diversion will be
obtained. Signings and safety
measures including flagmen are
provided at the site.
14 Barricading The activities would be restricted to During Contractor
site project sites and right of way for construction
alignment. Barricading with
adequate marking, flags, reflectors
etc. will be provided along the
alignment for safety of restricted
traffic movement and pedestrians.
15 Pollution from All waste arising from the project is During Contractor
Construction to be disposed off in the manner in Construction
Wastes consultation with TWAD Engineer
16 Storage of Site identified for safe storage and During Contractor
chemicals and handling of chemicals and other Construction
other hazardous materials provided with
hazardous proper display of requirements and
materials marking as protected area.
17 Informatory The contractor will provide, erect During Contractor
signs and and maintain informatory/ safety Construction
Hoardings signs hoardings written in English
and local language, wherever
required or as suggested by the
Engineer
18 First Aid The contractor will arrange for: During Contractor
 A readily available first aid unit Construction
including an adequate supply of
sterilized dressing materials and
appliances as per the Factories
Rules in every work zone.
 Availability of suitable transport
at all times to take injured or
sick person(s) to the nearest
hospital

160
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

19 Risk from  The contractor will take all During Contractor

Electrical required precautions to prevent Construction
Equipment danger from electrical equipment
and ensure that- no material will
be so stacked or placed as to
cause danger or inconvenience to
any person or the public
 All necessary fencing and lights
will be provided to protect the
public in construction zones.
 All machines to be used in the
construction will conform to the
relevant Indian Standard (IS)
codes, will be free from patent
defect, will be kept in good
working order, will be regularly
inspected and properly
maintained as per IS provision
and to the satisfaction of the
Engineer
20 Waste  The contractor will provide During Contractor
Disposal garbage bins in the camps and Construction
ensure that these are regularly
emptied and disposed off in a
hygienic manner as per the
Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan approved by
the Engineer.
 Unless otherwise arranged by
local sanitary authority,
arrangements for disposal of
night soils (human excreta)
suitably approved by the local
medical health or municipal
authorities or as directed by
Engineer will have to be
provided by the contractor
21 Clearing of  Contractor to prepare site After Contractor
construction restoration plans, the plan is to completion
camps and be implemented by the of
restoration Construction
contractor prior to
demobilization

161
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 On completion of the works, all

temporary structures will be
cleared away, all rubbish
cleared, excreta or other
disposal pits or trenches filled in
and effectively sealed off and
the site left clean and tidy, at the
contractor’s expenses, to the
entire satisfaction of the
engineer.
22 Pollution from  The contractor will ensure that During Contractor
Fuel and all construction vehicle parking Construction
Lubricants location, fuel / lubricants
storage sites, vehicle, machinery
and equipment maintenance and
re fuelling sites will be located
at least 500m from rivers and
irrigation canal / ponds
 All location and layout plans of
such sites will be submitted by
the Contractor prior to their
establishment and will be
approved by the Engineer
 Contractor will ensure that all
vehicle / machinery and
equipment operation,
maintenance and re fuelling will
be carried out in such a fashion
that spillage of fuels and
lubricants does not contaminate
the ground.
 Contractor will arrange for
collection, storing and disposal
of oily wastes to the pre-
identified disposal sites (list to
be submitted to Engineer) and
approved by the Engineer. All
spills and collected petroleum
products will be disposed off in
accordance with MoEF and state
PCB guidelines.
23 Safety  Adequate precautions will be During Contractor
Aspects construction

162
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

taken to prevent the accidents

and from the machineries. All
machines used will conform to
the relevant Indian standards
Code and will be regularly
inspected by the TWAD.
 Where loose soil is met with,
shoring and strutting will be
provided to avoid collapse of
soil.
 Protective footwear and
protective goggles to all workers
employed on mixing of materials
like cement, concrete etc.
 Welder’s protective eye-shields
will be provided to workers’ who
are engaged in welding works.
 Earplugs will be provided to
workers exposed to loud noise,
and workers working in crushing,
compaction, or concrete mixing
operation
 The contractor will supply all
necessary safety appliances such
as safety goggles, helmets, safety
belts, ear plugs, mask etc to
workers and staffs.
 The contractor will comply with
all the precautions as required for
ensuring the safety of the
workmen as per the International
Labor Organization (ILO)
Convention No.62 as far as those
are applicable to this contract.
 The contractor will make sure
that during the construction work
all relevant provisions of the
Factories Act, 1948 and the
Building and other Construction
Workers (regulation of
Employment and Conditions of
Services) Act, 1996 and adhered

163
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

to.
 The contractor will not employ
any person below the age of 18
years for any work and no
woman will be employed on the
work of painting with products
containing lead in any form.

24 Protection of The STP, and pumping stations are Construction Contractor and
sites provided with compound wall of Phase TWAD
height 2.0m and fencing will be
provided in lifting stations for safety
purpose. .
25 Accessibility Adequate road facilities have been Construction Contractor and
to sites provided in LS, PS and STP for Phase TWAD
movement of vehicle and unloading
of chemicals without disturbing of
existing features and activities.
26 Environmental The water, air, soil and noise quality Pre- TWAD &
Monitoring will be monitored in pre- construction Contractor.
construction and Construction phase &
as detailed in Table 7.2. Construction
Construction of Pumping / Lifting Stations / Sewage Treatment
Plant
27 Protection of The top soil to be protected and During Contractor
top soil compacted after completion of work, construction
where the pipelines run.
28 Storage of Site for storage of construction During Contractor
construction materials to be identified in construction
material consultation with Engineer in
charge, without affecting the nearby
the residents, traffic and other
common utilities
29 Disposal of A suitable site to be identified for During Contractor
silt / sludge safe disposal of silt /sludge construction
generated at the pumping / lifting
station sites, in consultation with the
Engineer.
30 Contamination Groundwater quality may get During Contractor and
of ground contaminated due to leaching of construction TWAD
water waste water. So, the treated water and
quality quality shall comply with the operation
standards laid down by the PCB for
disposal onto land, water body or for
irrigation use.
Regular monitoring is required for
the treated sewage quality and also

164
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

the ground water quality in the

nearby areas and ensures compliance
with PCB standards.
31 Water The Contractor shall take all During Contractor and
Pollution precautionary measures to prevent construction TWAD
From the wastewater generated during
Construction construction from entering into
Wastes streams, water bodies or the
irrigation system.
All waste arising from the project is
to be disposed off in the manner that
is acceptable by the Engineer.
32 Impact of To avoid the problems of foul smell During Contractor and
Surrounding polluted air, insects, noise pollution construction TWAD
areas and other problems buffer zones to
be provided in the form of green belt
around the STP site, has to be
strictly ensured.
33 Disposal of  The treated water quality shall During Contractor and
treated waste comply with the standards of construction TWAD
water. TNPCB before let out into the and
operation
stream / nallah /open land
/irrigation purposes, and
necessary permission to be
obtained from the concerned
department.
 Ensure efficient working
condition of treatment plant.
 Prevent the pollution of stream
water and other water bodies
receiving STP discharge.
Operation Phase
1 Noise  The pumps will adhere to the During Contractor /TWAD
Management standards of noise. Regular operation
maintenance will be carried out
to restrict the noise levels.
 Provided noise control measures
and Staffs entering the pump
room will be provided with
PPEs.
 Noise monitoring will be carried
out at treatment plant and
Pumping / lifting stations.
 Acoustic enclosure D.G set will
be provided for reduction of

165
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

noise.
 Green belt is provided in STP for
reduction of noise level.
2 Air  Diesel generators will be During Contractor /TWAD
Management operated only for emergency operation
power backup. The emission
source diesel generators will
have adequate stack height as
per the norms of CPCB and
regular maintenance of diesel
engines has to be ensured in
the Treatment Plant.
 Three chlorine cylinder per
month will be used for
disinfection process in STP
plant. Automatic chlorine
leak detection and related
alarm equipment to be
installed at chlorine storage
room in STP Plant, It is
connected to a remote
audible and visual alarm
system and checked on a
regular basis to verify proper
operation.
 Chlorination room will be
constructed separately (3.00
m x 3.00 m x 3.50 m) and
full, partial, or empty
chlorine cylinders will be
stored in separate area in
chlorination room.
 Ventilation and duct work
within a chlorine storage
room shall be separated from
domestic building ventilation
systems. All chlorine room
duct work should be gas tight
and not pass through other
rooms or areas of the
building.
 Chlorine room location will
be on the prevailing
downwind side of the
building, away from
entrances, windows, louvers,
walkways, etc.

166
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 Tree plantation would be

provided to control and
reduce odour in STP, Lifting
& Pumping station and
nearby localities.
 Deodorizer (odour control
chemicals) is the alternative
method for control of odour
problem, which will be used
only during odour generation
at the STP and all Pumping
stations.
 Lifting and Pumping stations
sumps will be closed by lid
and vent pipe will be
provided for 1 m height for
gas ability to move gases and
air out of the tank when it
fills up with waste and liquid
volume.
3 Sludge  The centrifuged sludge will be During Contractor/TWAD
Management stored in the premises of the operation
Sewage Treatment Plant then
used for agricultural purposes.
 Sludge will be monitoring twice
in a year.
 Conduct periodic testing of dried
sludge /compost to check
presence of heavy metals and
confirming the concentrations to
use as compost.
4 Transportation Guidelines and procedures in Motor During Contractor
and storage of vehicle Act 1986 for transportation; operation
hazardous Manufacture, Storage and import of
chemicals Hazardous Chemicals Rules 1989 to
be followed for storage and handling
of Hazardous chemicals: Insurance
covers to be taken for accidents and
cost of clean-up operations.
5 Other  Providing equipment like ear During TWAD &
Management plugs to workers near the noise operation Contractor
measures at source.
Sites  Providing PPEs for safe working
of personnel in critical areas like
chlorination plant will be
ensured.

167
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 Display boards on safety

measures and emergency
measures to be installed.
 Regular training for the staffs
operating the LS, PS and STP
with various aspects of
maintaining sewage quality and
safety.
 PPEs for the workers exposed to
high noise.
 The odour produced from STP,
Pumping and Lifting Stations,
Level control sensor will be
provided for the continuous flow
of sewage in pumping and lifting
stations.
 Regular maintenance of the
greenbelt and landscaping made
at the project sites with watering,
manuring, pruning etc.
6 Training for Periodical training would be During TWAD/Contractor.
staff provided to the staffs and operators Operation
involved in the project O&M for
chemical handling, emergency, line
maintenance, valve operations,
electrical & mechanical operations,
7 Sewage  Adequate road facility has been During TWAD/Contractor
Treatment provided inside of treatment Operation
Plant plant for movement vehicles and
heavy vehicles for unloading of
chemical.
 Rain water harvesting will be
provided for recharging of
ground water through pit.
 Display boards on safety
measures and emergency
measures to be installed.
 Regular training for the staffs
operating the units of PS and
STP with various aspects of
maintaining safety.
 Providing equipment’s like ear
plugs to workers near the noise
source.
 Provide flow measurement
devises at inlet and outlet, and
maintain flow records
 Provision of appropriate training
and personal protection

168
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

equipment to the workers and

staff.
 Conduct periodic testing of
dried sludge /compost to check
presence of heavy metals and
confirming the concentrations to
use as compost.
 Monitor regularly and ensure
that there is no illegal discharge
through manholes or inspection
chambers; conduct public
awareness programs; in
coordination with TNPCB. No
wastewater from industrial
premises (including domestic
wastewater) shall be allowed to
dispose into municipal sewers
8 Environmental  The water, air noise and soil During TWAD/Contractor
Monitoring quality will be monitored Operation
periodically.
 The treated sewage effluent
quality will be monitored at
various points at STP, Disposal
point etc.,
 Monitoring of noise levels will be
carried out at, Pumping/ Lifting
station and STP.
 Detailed monitoring record will
be maintained. Periodical report
will be send to the Engineer. The
frequency and parameters for
Environmental Monitoring detail
is given in Table 7.3 of the EIA
report.
9 Disposal of  STP operations shall take place During TWAD/Contractor
treated waste only after Consent to Operate Operation
water certificate is accorded by the
TNPCB and treated water quality
shall be meet the CPCB
discharge standards
 Performance standards shall
always be maintained, ensuring
efficient working condition of
treatment plant.
10 Odour  Tree plantation would be During TWAD/Contractor
Management provided in STP and Main Operation
pumping station to control and

169
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

reduce odour in nearby localities.

 The odour produced from STP,
Pumping and Lifting Stations,
Level control sensor will be
provided for the continuous flow
of sewage in pumping and lifting
stations.
 Inlet sump, primary treatment
units in STP, Lifting & pumping
stations would be maintained
clean by suitably disposing off
all generated grit waste on daily
basis.
 Tree plantation would be
provided to control and reduce
odour in STP, Lifting &
Pumping station and nearby
localities.
 Deodorizer (odour control
chemicals) is the alternative
method for control of odour
problem, which will be used only
during odour generation at the
STP and all Pumping stations.
 Lifting and Pumping stations
sumps will be closed by lid and
vent pipe will be provided for 1
m height for gas ability to move
gases and air out of the tank
when it fills up with waste and
liquid volume.
 The odour produced from STP,
Pumping and Lifting Stations,
Level control sensor will be
provided for the continuous flow
of sewage in pumping and lifting
stations.
11 Handling of  The unit will be provided During TWAD/Contractor
Chemicals necessary safety measures for the operation
storage of coagulant (Alum or
polyelectrolyte) & Chlorine
cylinders and provide emergency
repair kit and personal safety kit

170
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

like full body cover, face mask,

body and eye shower etc. at the
site.
 Eye showers one number each
will be provided in chlorine
cylinder storage place of STP
plant (total of 2 Nos). The unit
will install Chlorine gas leak
detector system (Chlorine Gas
Sensor) at the site.
12 Disposal of  Treated sludge will be used for During TWAD/Contractor
Sludge agricultural purposes. operation
 Contractor shall be prepare a
sludge management plan and
adhere to the same.
 Sludge will be monitoring twice
in a year.
 Conduct periodic testing of dried
sludge /compost to check
presence of heavy metals and
confirming the concentrations to
use as compost.
13 Safety  The STP, and pumping stations During TWAD/Contractor
Aspects of are provided with compound Operation
O&M wall of height 3.0m and fencing
will be provided in lifting
stations for safety purpose.
 The structures will be provided
with easy access ladders, and
handrails, interconnections
between all units with proper
safe walkway platforms for
movement to avoid falling of
human and materials. Electrical
cables are laid in cable trenches.
Open spaces at height will be
covered with parapet walls and
handrails.
 Educate local communities to
report immediately to
municipality whenever they
notice any malfunction of the
sewerage system
 Regular inspection of the entire

171
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

sewer system to check for

blockages/vandalism etc. This
should be followed by regular
repairs and servicing of the
plant whilst addressing cause of
failure.
 Label all inflammable materials
and store them appropriately
 Provision of adequate
firefighting equipment capable
of fighting all classes of fire
 Put “ No Smoking Signs” in
areas where inflammables are
stored
 Train workers on the use of
firefighting equipment.

172
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

7.3 Environmental Monitoring Plan

Environmental Monitoring Plan of construction and operation phase is given in Table 7.2 & 7.3.
Table 7-2 Environmental Monitoring Plan Pre-Construction & Construction Phase
Responsible
Attributes Parameters Frequency Location
Agency
Pre-Construction & Construction Phase
Air Quality PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO and Seasonal Sampling Sewage Treatment Plant, Pipe Contractor through
Pb (standards as per CPCB) laying work, pumping / lifting approved
station locations and other places
monitoring
of work agencies
Water Quality Treated Water standards as Seasonal Sampling Sewage Treatment Plant, pumping Contractor through
per CPCB. / lifting station locations and approved
other places of work monitoring
agencies
Noise Level Noise level on dB (A) scale Seasonal Sampling Sewage Treatment Plant, Pumping Contractor through
noise levels on dB (A) scale (as /Lifting stations approved
per MoEF Noise Rulers, 2000) monitoring
agencies
Soil Quality Monitoring of Pb, SAR and Oil Seasonal Sampling Sewage Treatment Plant, Pumping Contractor
& Grease (standards as per /Lifting stations
TNPCB)
Health All relevant Regular check-ups as --- Contractor
parameters including HIV per Factories
Act

173
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Table 7- 3 Environmental Monitoring Plan Operation Phase

Responsible
Attributes Parameters Frequency Location
Agency
Operation Phase
Air & Odour Emissions PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO,H2S Seasonal Sampling Sewage Treatment Plant, Pipe TWAD
and Pb (standards as per (3 times a year) laying work, pumping / lifting
CPCB) station locations
Stack monitoring for D.G.Sets
Stack Monitoring for D.G.Sets
Water Quality Seasonal Sampling STP - Inlet, Outlet and point TWAD
Treated Effluent COD, BOD, pH, NH4-N, N-total (4 times a year) of disposal/ receiving water
and Total Suspended Solids, body.
Coliform, etc. (standards as
per CPCB)
Surface Water As Per CPCB (Standard Indian
Standard (IS : 2296 – 1982))
Ground Water Drinking water standards as Ground water samples from
per IS 10500:2012. surrounding STP and disposal
point.
Noise Level Noise level on dB (A) scale Seasonal Sampling Sewage Treatment Plant, Pipe TWAD
noise levels on dB (A) scale (4 times a year) laying work, pumping / lifting
(as per MoEF Noise Rules, station locations
2000)

174
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Soil quality Monitoring of Pb, SAR and Oil Seasonal Sampling Sewage Treatment Plant, Pipe TWAD
& Grease (4 times a year) laying work, pumping / lifting
station locations
Health All relevant parameters Regular checkups as --- TWAD
(BP, Sugar, chest X-ray, per factories act.
Eye vision, etc.)
Safety Monitoring First Aid, replacement of PPE Yearly Sewage Treatment Plant TWAD
Green Belt Development No. of plants, species, survival Half yearly Sewage Treatment Plant TWAD
status
Sludge NPK values and Heavy metal Half yearly Sewage Treatment Plant TWAD
traces

175
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

7.4 Budgetary Allocation For Implemetation Of Environmental Aspects During The

Construction & Operation Phase Of The Project

The environmental monitoring and other mitigation measures as proposed in the

above sections shall be implemented during the construction and operation period. For
the same budget has been allocated. A cost break up which will be required to be
included in the project cost towards the environmental protection, control & mitigation
measures and implementation of the EMP given in Table 7-4.

The cost to be incurred for various activities for the proposed project to
safeguard the environment is detailed below.

Table 7-4: EMP Cost of the Project

S Description Amount In Lakhs Remarks
No
1 Sewage Treatment Plant
a Provision for landscaping and 3.52 Included in BOQ
greenbelt
b Development of green belt 1.40 Included in BOQ
c Construction of Compound Wall 17.87 Included in BOQ
d Pipe connection works 26.88 Included in BOQ
e Formation of internal road 14.42 Included in BOQ
f Sludge Management Included in O&M cost
2 Collection System, Pumping
Station and others
a) Provision for shifting of utilities 15.83 Included in project estimate
b) Disposal of excavated excess earth 28.75 Included in BOQ
and construction debris
3 Monitoring as per Table 6.2 & 6.3 3.0 Included in O&M cost estimate
4 Energy Efficient Lightings 2.8 Included in O&M cost estimate
5 Odour Control 30 Will be analysed at each
locations and suggest for
provision wherever required
and cost may be met out from
general savings
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Environmental screening Form

PART A (to be prepared by Urban Local Body for each sub – project loan)

Name of the applying urban local body : Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board
Project location : Perundurai
Sub project :UGSS to Perundurai Town panchayat with 3.14 MLD
sewerage treatment plant

Project Components

S.No Component Remarks

Name of the Project : Conducting
1
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
Study and submitting report for the UGSS
to Perundurai Town panchayat with
construction of 3.14 MLD Sewerage
Treatment Plant with FAB Technology for
in Erode District, Tamilnadu.
Brief description of the project proposal
Project Town :Perundurai Town, Erode
District, Tamil Nadu.
STP Capacity :3.14 MLD
Technology used :Fluidizes Aerobic Bio
Reactor Technology (FAB)
Project cost: INR. 5478 lakhs

2 Project Site- 1
&
Project Components:
1. House connections and local
Number of project sites and Project
sewerage.
components
2. Main and trunk sewers.
3. Pumping station.
4. Pumping main.
5. Sewage Treatment plant
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

3 The scheme contains provisions for

Alignment length sewer line laying for a total length of
47.497k m
4 1. Perundurai Town, Erode District,
Tamil Nadu
Location of the Project Sites & Current Use
2. Government Poramboke.
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

5 Schools & Colleges

 Sri Durga matriculation higher
Nearby landuses and distance – residences, school≈3.06Km towards SSW
 Kongu Polytechnic college≈1.55km
schools, hospitals, drinking water source, towards NE
 Kongu Velalar Polytechnic College
upstream and downstream uses of rivers etc
≈6.69km towards WNW
 Kongu Engineering College≈1.93 Km
towards NE
 M.P Nachimuthuu M.Jaganathan
Engineering College≈8.88Km towards
SSE
 Maharaja college for women ≈2.95km
towards NE
 Nandha Engineering College ≈4.04Km
towards NE
 National Management College≈5.68Km
towards NW
 Palaniswamy College of Art≈2.9 Km
towards NNE
 Perundurai Medical College≈3.65km
towards NW
 Vidhya Mandhir Institute of
Technology ≈ 5.44 km towards SSW
Religious Places
 Chennimalai Lord Murugan Temple ≈
11.23 Km towards S
Hospital
 Shree Shanti Hospital ≈ 2.04 km
towards NNW
 MNP Nursing Home ≈ 3.17 Km towards
NW
Tourist Places
 Vellode Bird
 Sanctuary≈6.08Km towards E
Others
 SIDCO ≈ 4.36 Km towards WSW
 Perundurai Railway Station ≈ 3.89 Km
towards E

Proximityof theSitetoWaterBodies

S.No Component Remarks

 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

 Bay of Bengal ≈ 246.63 km towards E

6 DistanceofsitesfromSea
 Arabian Sea ≈ 192.00 km towards W

7 MSLofProjectSites ≈278 m aprox

8 DistancefromnearestWaterBody(River, Noyyal River ≈14.98 km towards SSE

Canal,Lake,Streamsetc.,)

9 MFLoftheProjectSites Nill

10 Distanceofnearestdrinkingwatersource Noyyal River ≈14.98 km towards SSE

ClimateChangerelatedParameters(General)

S.No Component Remarks

29.5 0C
10 MeanTemperatureintheprojecttown

11 AnnualRainfallintheprojecttown 606 mm

Project Components

S.No Component Remarks

June - August
12 MonsoonPeriodintheprojecttown

13 NearestWeatherWarningSystem Pelamedu

Biological Environment
S.No Components Yes No Remarks / Identified
Problems
Are there according to background No Nill
1
research / observations any
threatened / endemic species in the
project area that could be affected by
the project?
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Will the project directly or indirectly

2
affect: Nill
1.1 Natural forest types?
1.2 Mangroves / wetlands / No
Estuaries No
1.3 Other SEC’s as Listed in
ECSMF
No

Will the project involve tree cutting? No Nill

3
Will there be any potential risk of No Nill
4
habitat fragmentation due to the
clearing activities? (eg. Hindrance to
the local bio diversity like disturbing
the migratory path of animals/ birds

Physical Environment
S.No Components Yes No Remarks / Identified
Problems
Yes 4.618 MLD
5 Waterquantity?Estimatedusageof
waterquantityfortheproject

Directimpactsarethosewhichareinduceddirectlybytheproject(e.g.Impactonwaterquality,airandnoiseetc…)whereastheIndirectimpactsaretho
sewhichareindirectlyinducedbytheproject(e.g.Trafficdiversionduringprojectconstructionetc…)

Project Components

S.No Component Remarks

No Nill
6 Will theprojectaffectstheRiver
flowpattern,streampatternorany
otherirrigationcanal?
No Nill
7 Istheprojectareais freefromflood
pronearea/low-lyingarea,ifyes
whatistheaveragefloodlevel
recordedforrecentyears?
Geology / Soils
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

S.No Components Yes No Remarks / Identified

Problems

Does the project activity involve No Nill

8
cutting and filling/ blasting etc…?
Will the project cause physical Yes Since the underground
structure will be
9 changes in the project area (e.g.,
constructed so there
changes to the topography) due to will be change in
topography .
excavation, earthwork etc…?
Will local resources, such as rocks, Nill
10 sand, gravel, or groundwater be
used? Estimated quantity of
materials required?
Pollution
S.No Components Yes No Remarks / Identified
Problems

Will the project use or store No Less quantity (20 litres

11 aprox) of diesel will be
dangerous substances (e.g., large
used only during power
quantities of hazardous materials failure.
like Diesel, Petroleum products
etc…)?
Will the project produce solid or Yes Solid waste and sludge
12
will be generated
liquid wastes?
during treatment of
waste water but it will
be taken to municipal
solid waste dump yard
and composting site.
Will the project cause air pollution? Yes Since it is an STP, no
13
major air pollutions
will be occur. But Only
during power failure 20
KVA DG set will be
operated, however 5m
stack height will be
provided as per CPCB
norms to combat the
effect on the air quality.
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Will the project generate noise? Yes

14 1. By incorporating
low-noise equipment in
the design and/or
locating such
mechanical equipment
in properly acoustically
lined buildings or
enclosures.
2. Acoustic enclosures
will be provided for DG.
3.Greenbelt is proposed
along the periphery of
the site which helps in
reducing the noise.
levels.

S.No Componen Remarks

t
No This is the Sewage
Will Treatment Plant, so no
15 theprojectgeneratewater water pollution will be
pollution(waterbodies/ generate.
groundwater)?
Yes The environmental
Will theprojectcauseconstruction
impact during the
16 Hazardtoworkers/residents
construction phase will
be of short term and
reversible nature and
will gradually eliminate
after the construction
activity is over. Further
the area of the unit is
small in size.
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Anyotherfeaturesoftheprojectsthat couldinfluenceambientenvironment:
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

HasanyEnvironmentalAssessment(EA)beencarriedout(ifyes,pleaseprovidetheEA
doctheform)

Date
nameoftheofficerres
ponsible
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Note:
1. Environmental Screening sheet must be completed by all Urban Local Bodies/
GovernmentDepartment applying for a loan from Tamil Nadu Urban Development Fund
(TNUDF).
2. Provide maps with the geographical location of the project; and an appropriately-scaled
map clearly showing the project area and project sites with land use, existing buildings,
infrastructure, vegetation, adjacent land use, utility lines, access roads and any planned
construction.
Screening Form

PART A (to be prepared by Urban Local Body for each sub – project loan)

NameofApplyingUrban LocalBody: Perundurai Taluk

NameoftheSub-component: Perundurai Taluk
NameofSub-project:3.14 MLD sewerage treatment plant
GeographicalareascoveredbySubProject:- Perundurai
ImplementingAgency:Tamil Nadu Water Supplyand Drainage Board
NameandaddressofOfficerresponsible:

LandUse,Resettlement,and/orLandAcquisition
S.No Components Yes No If Yesprovidedetails
1 Does the sub-project No
involveacquisitionofprivateland?
2 Alienationofany typeofGovernment Yes
landincludingthat ownedbyUrban
LocalBody?
3 Clearance of encroachment from No
Government/Urban LocalbodyLand?
4 Clearance of squatting from No
Government/Urban LocalBodyLand?
5 Numberofstructures, bothauthorized No
and/orunauthorized tobeacquired/
cleared/
6 Numberofhouseholdtobedisplaced? No
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

7 Detailsofvillagecommonproperties No
tobealienatedPasture Land(acres)
Cremation/burialground andothers
specify?
8 Describeexisting landusesonand Yes 1. Agricultural property
around theprojectarea(e.g., 2. Industrial property
community facilities,agriculture, 3. Residential property
tourism,privateproperty)?
9 Willtheprojectresult in construction Yes The construction workers
workersorotherpeoplemovinginto are basically migrant
orhaving accesstothearea(foralong workers involving different
timeperiodandinlarge numbers type of skill required for
comparedtopermanentresidents)? each of the stage of the
project.

10 Arefinancialcompensationmeasures No
expectedtobeneeded?
Lossof Crops,FruitTrees,HouseholdInfrastructureandlivelihood
S.No Components Yes No If Yesprovidedetails
11 Will the project result in the
permanentortemporarylossof
11.1 Crops? No

11.2 Fruittrees /coconutpalms? Specify No

withnumbers
11.4 Loss of Agriculture Land? Specify with No
numbers
11.5 PettyShops No

11.6 Vegetable/Fish/Meatvending No

11.7 Cyclerepairshop No

11.8 Garage No

11.9 Teastalls No

11.10 LossofGrazing No

11.11 Lossofaccessto forestproduce No

(NTFP)
11.12 Anyothers-specify No
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Note:
1. Socialscreeningsheetmustbecompletedby
allurbanlocalbodies/governmentdepartment
applyingforaloanfromTamilNaduUrbanDevelopmentFund(TNUDF) forany sub-
projects involving land alienation of any Government land under different
tenure including “Poramboke”land“owned”by theUrbanLocalBody
oranyotherGovernment institution/department/organizationwhich are
alienated in favour of project activity, when encroachments/encroachers
areclearedandwhencommunityassetssuchasplacesofworship,
burial/cremationgroundsetc.,
arerequiredtobeclearedfromtheexecutionofprojectactivity.

2.
Thelanddetailsfortheprojectcomponentsshallbeannexedwithdetailssuchaslocati
on, survey
numbers,extentavailableandrequired,landuseclassification,currentlanduse,land
ownership, alienation/acquisition
statusalongwithFMBextractswhilesubmittingtheSocial ScreeningForm.
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

8. IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

The proposed project is to provide an Underground Sewerage Supply Scheme to

Perundurai. This project will be implemented by TWAD under the scheme of Tamil
Nadu Sustainable Urban Development Project (TNSUDP) at an estimating cost of
Rs.54.78 Crores.
The project is proposed to be implemented by TWAD through Prospective contractor.
The environmental management plan identified for the construction will be included in
the bid documents for ensuring implementation of the environmental safeguards.
Implementation of the management measures by the contractor will be ensured by
TWAD Board and report on ESMF compliance will be submitted to TNUIFSL
periodically.
The management measures identified for operation phase will be taken up by the
Prospective contractor upto maintenance period and beyond that by TWAD Board.

8.1 Grievance Mechanism

TWAD Board has proposed to provide Underground Sewerage Supply Scheme to
Perundurai town and treat the Sewage in Sewage Treatment Plant of 3.14 MLD using
Fluidized Aerobic Bio-Reactor Technology. The management measures identified for the
operation phase will be taken up by the TWAD Board upon completion of construction
activities. The TWAD Board will have Grievance Redressal mechanisms to handle the
grievances of the project. A project level grievance Redressal committee will be set up
and the members are as follows (preferably one of them as women)
 Executive Engineer (Projects –TWAD Board)
 Executive Officer (Perundurai town panchayat)
 A person who is publicly known in the local area

TWAD Board will submit monthly reports on the status of compliance with the ECSMF
requirements to TNUIFSL.

8.1.1 Grievance Redressal Committee

The GRC shallconvene meetings of the committee as necessary at such place or

places in the Project Implementation Agency as he considers appropriate; and Conduct
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

the proceedings in an informal manner as he considers appropriate with the object to

bring an amicable settlement between the parties.
Step by step approach will be followed for redressing grievances. First, the
aggrieved Project Affected Person to approach the GRC in the first stage and the
grievance committee will look into the grievances and resolve the issues. The
proceedings of GRC will be documented. If not satisfied with the resolution provided by
GRC, then the complainants can appeal to the grievance redressal mechanisms available
at the office of Executive Engineer at Perundurai.
The complaints will be acknowledged to the complainant. Efforts will be made by
TWAD to ensure closure of complaint within a maximum period of 30 days from the
date of its receipt. Serious issues shall be attended as early as possible. If not satisfied
with the resolution provided by GRC, the complaints shall be handled at higher level i.e,
Chief engineer of TWAD.
If there is any grievance, it involves a process of consultation and negotiation with the
committee. The grievances relating to the problem will be recorded and each step in the
resolution process also will be recorded and each step in the resolution process also will
be recorded. The elected representative will be involved in representing the issue and
act as communication link between the persons involved. When the problems are
identified, it will be taken to the personnel who respond and pass the information to the
committee immediately. It is then the role of the committee to investigate and consult
with the persons to evaluate the seriousness of the issues and work with the
management to resolve the problem. TWAD shall submit monthly reports on the status
of compliance with the ECSMF requirements to TNUIFSL.
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

9. PROJECT BENEFITS

The main objective of the project is to provide adequate sewage disposal

facilities to the residents of Perundurai Town. On implementation of the present project,
the health and sanitation situation of the town will be improved significantly thereby
reducing the incidence of water borne diseases and associated medical expenses of the
consumers. Besides, there will also be reduction in loss of productive man – days as a
result of reduced incidence of health problems and subsequent improvement or
economic conditions of Perundurai Town. Due to high ground water table in Perundurai
Town, the provision of an effective sewerage system will have permanent positive
impact on the ground water quality of the town.
 Perundurai Town Hygienic will be improved
 Mixing of Sewage water into Land, Canals, Lakes & Ponds will be reduced
 Ground Water degradation will be reduced
 Soil contamination will be reduced
 Sewage odour can be reduced in the open area Overall Water pollution and soil
pollution due to Sewage will be reduced and the safe environment will be
improved in and around the project area i.e., Perundurai Town.
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

10. CONCLUSION

 The impact on environment will be minimum and can be further reduced by

implementing various mitigating measures and regular monitoring programs.

 The proposed sewage treatment Plant have beneficialimpacts in terms of

hygienic and safe disposal of treated effluent with incidental benefits like
employment opportunities both in the construction stage and operation stage.
Also the modernized installation will facilitate greater level of operating safety.

 Due to the proposed project the socio economic activities will be developed in
and around the project area.

 The monitoring program on various environmental parameters will be

undertaken for the continual improvements towards protecting the
environment to achieve the above requirements.

 Proper methods have been planned to safe and secured disposal of treated
effluent and handling of solid waste. Hence the project has been strongly
recommended.
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Quality Policy of HECS

 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME
CHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

QCI-NABET - EIA Accreditation

UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Annexure - 1
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Annexure -2
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Annexure 3
 UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA

Annexure – 4
UNDERGROUND SEWERAGE SCHEME FOR
PERUNDURAI TOWN PANCHAYAT – EIA