0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views4 pages

academic audit final 2023

The document is an academic audit sheet for SRM Dental College and Hospital's Department of Orthodontics covering the period from July 2017 to June 2022. It includes various criteria for evaluation such as curricular aspects, teaching and learning evaluation, research and innovations, and student support, with specific metrics and weightage assigned to each criterion. The final score awarded is 2.8 on a 4-point scale, resulting in a 3-star grade.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views4 pages

academic audit final 2023

The document is an academic audit sheet for SRM Dental College and Hospital's Department of Orthodontics covering the period from July 2017 to June 2022. It includes various criteria for evaluation such as curricular aspects, teaching and learning evaluation, research and innovations, and student support, with specific metrics and weightage assigned to each criterion. The final score awarded is 2.8 on a 4-point scale, resulting in a 3-star grade.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

SRM Dental College and Hospital,

Ramapuram Department of orthodontics


ACADEMIC AUDIT SHEET FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 2017- JUNE
2022
Sl. NAAC Ref. no. - Key Indicators Documents to be submitted during audit or Metrics Self Evaluation Assessment by Audit team (pl enter ONLY (Weightage x Rubrics
No. (KIs) to be followed by dept. on a 4- ONE suitable point in the corresponding Point awarded
point scale column on a 4-point scale)

Weightage

0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

Criteria 1 : Curricular Aspects (Weightage: 45) 170


1.2.1 Number of Inter-disciplinary / inter- 4 1
1 departmental / training courses offered during the 10 40 <5 5-10 10-15 15-20 >=20
last five years
1.2 Academic Flexibility
1.2.2 Number of subject related Certificate / 4 1
2 Diploma / Add-on courses enrolled by students 10 40 <5 5-10 10-15 15-20 >=20
during the last 5 years.
1.3.3 Number of certificate / value-added courses / 4 1
Diploma Programme/ online courses like MOOCs/
3 SWAYAM / e_Pathshala/ NPTEL etc. where the 5 20 <5 5-10 10-15 15-20 >=25
students of the institution have enrolled and
1.3 Curriculum Enrichment benefitted
1.3.4 Percentage of Programs that has components 4
4 of field viits/projects / research projects / 1 10 40 <20 20-40 40-60 60-80 >=80
internships/community postings
1.4.2 Structured feedback for curriculum and its B
transactions is obtained regularly from stakeholders
like Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni,
Academic peers etc., and Feedback processes of the
institution may be classified as follows:
A. Feedback collected, analysed, action taken &
communicated to relevant body and feedback
5 1.4 Feedback System hosted on the institutional website 3 10 30 E D C B A
B. Feedback collected, analysed, action has been
taken and communicated to the relevant body
C. Feedback collected and analysed
D. Feedback collected
E. Feedback not collected

Criteria 2 : Teaching Learning and Evaluation (Weightage: 120) 400


2.1 Student Enrolment and 2.1.2 Enrollment Percentage 3
6 3 10 30 <50 50-70 70-80 80-90 >=90
Profile
2.2 Catering to Student 2.2.2 Student - Full time teacher ratio (Data for the 4 50:1 – 30:1 – 20:1-
7 latest completed academic year) 4 5 20 >60:1 <=20:1
Diversity 60:1 50:1 30:1
2.3.2 Institute facilitates the use of Clinical Skills 3
Laboratory / Simulation Based Learning The
Institution:
1. has Basic Clinical Skills / Simulation Training
Models and Trainers for skills in the relevant
disciplines.
2. has advanced simulators for simulation-based
Any Any
8 2.3 Teaching Learning Process training 3 10 30 None Any one All four
two three
3. has structured programs for training and
assessment of students in Clinical Skills Lab /
Simulation based learning.
4. Conducts training programs for the faculty in the
use of clinical skills lab and simulation methods of
teaching-learning.

2.4.1 Percentage of full time teachers appointed 4


9 against the number of sanctioned posts during the 4 10 40 <50 50-70 70-80 80-90 >=90
last five years
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality 2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time 2
10 teachers (Data to be provided only for the latest 2 10 20 <6 6-9 9-12 12-15 >=15
completed academic year, in number of years)
2.6.2 Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog 4
2.6 Student Performance and students) (Data to be provided only for the latest
11 4 15 60 <60 60-70 70-80 80-90 >=90
Learning Outcomes completed academic year)
2.7.1 Online student satisfaction survey regarding
2.7 Students satisfaction
12 teaching learning process (percentage of students 50 200 <60 60-70 70-80 80-90 >=90
survey surveyed during last 5 years) 4 4

Criteria 3 : Research and Innovations and Extension (Weightage: 55) 45


3.1.2 Percentage of teachers receiving national/ 0
international fellowship/financial support by various
13 agencies for advanced studies/ research during the 0 5 0 <5 5-10 10-15 15-20 >=20
last five years
3.1 Resource mobilization for
research 3.1.3 Number of research projects per teacher 0
funded by government, non-government , industry,
14 corporate houses, international bodies during last 5 0 5 0 <0.1 0.1-0.2 0.2-0.3 0.3-0.4 >=0.5
years

3.2.2 Number of workshops/seminars conducted on 3 0


IPR, Research methodology, Good clinical,
15 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem 5 15 <5 5-9 10-19 20-29 >=30
Laboratory, Pharmacy and collection practicesduring
the last five years
3.3.2 Number of Ph.Ds awarded per recognized 0
16 guide during the last five years 0 5 0 <1 1-2 2-4 4-5 >=5

3.3.3 Number of research papers published per 3 0


17 3.3 Research Publications and teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC website 10 30 <2 2-3 3-4 4-5 >=5
Awards during the last five years
3.3.4 Number of books and chapters in edited 0
18 volumes published per teacher during the last five 0 5 0 <1 1-4 4-7 7-10 >=10
years
3.4.1 Number of extension and outreach programs 1
19 3.4 Extension Activities conducted by the institution during the last five 1 10 10 <40 40-59 60-79 80-99 >=100
years
3.5.2 Number of functional MoUs /linkage with 1
institutions/ industries in India and abroad for
20 3.5 Collaboration internship, on-the-job training, project work, student 1 10 10 <5 5-9 10-29 30-39 >=40
/ faculty exchange and collaborative research during
last 5 years

Criteria 4 : Infrastructure and Learning Resources (Weightage : 16) 64


4.2.4 Availability of infrastructe for community A
based learning. Institution has: A. Attached
4.2 Clinical, equipment and satellite primary health centre. B. Attached rural
21 health centre with residential facility for students 4 6 24 E D C B A
Laboratory learning resources
C. Attached rural health centre D. Mobile clinical
service facility E.None of the facility
4.3.4 Percentage expenditure for purchase of books/ 4
4.3 Library as a Learning e-books and subscription to journals/e-journals
22 4 5 20 <2 2-6 6-8 8-10 >=10
Resource during the last five years
4.4.1 Percentage of classrooms, seminar halls and 4
23 4.4 IT Infrastructure demonstration rooms linked with internet/Wifi 4 5 20 <40 40-50 50-60 60-70 >=70
enabled ICT facilities

Criteria 5 : Student support and progression (Weightage: 63) 222


5.1.5 Institution has a transparent mechanism for
timely redressal of student grivances / prevention of
sexual harassmant / prevention of ragging. A.
Record of action taken B. Periodic meetings of the
24 5.1 Student support 4 13 52 E D C B A
committee with minutes C. Presence of committee
and mechanism for receiving student grievances
(onine/offline) D. Adoption of guidelines of
regulatory bodies E. None A
5.2.1 Percentage of students qualifying in 4
25 state/National/International level Examination 4 10 40 <0.4 0.4-0.6 0.6-0.8 0.8-1.0 >=1.0
during last five years (eg. NEET-PG, UPSC etc)
5.2.2 Percentage of placement/self employment of 4
26 5.2 Student Progression outgoing students during the last five years 4 15 60 <40 40-50 50-60 60-70 >=70

5.2.3 Percentage of graduated students who have 4


27 progressed to higher education year-wise during last 4 15 60 <5 5-20 20-30 30-40 >=40
five years
5.3.1 Number of awards/medals won by students for 1
outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities
5.3 Student Participation and
28 at inter-university/state/national/ international 1 10 10 <10 10-19 20-49 50-79 >=80
Activities events (award for a team event should be counted as
one) during the last five years)

Criteria 6 : Governance, Leadership and Management (Weightage : 18) 52


6.3.2 Percentage of teachers provided with financial 4
support to attend conferences / workshops and
29 towards membership fee of professional bodies 4 7 28 <10 10-25 25-40 40-60 >=60
during the last 5 years
6.3.4 Percentage of teachers undergoing online/ 4
6.3 Faculty Empowerment
face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes
Strategies
(FDP)/Management Development
30 Programs(MDP))during the last five years 4 6 24 <10 10-25 25-40 40-60 >=60
(Professional Development Programmes,
Orientation/Induction Programmes, Refresher
Course, Short Term Course )
6.4.3 Funds / Grants received from government 0
bodies/non government during the last five years for
6.4 Financial Management and development and maintenance of infrastructure (not
31 0 5 0 <30 30-60 60-80 80-100 >=100
Resource Mobilization covered under Criteria III and V ) (INR in Lakhs)

Criteria 7 : Institutional Values and Best practices (Weightage : 5) 5


7.1.1 Number of gender equity sensitization 1
7.1 Institutional values and
32 programs organised by the institution during the last 1 5 5 <4 4-6 6-8 8-10 >=10
social responsibilities five years

Final score awarded (on a 4-point scale) = 2.8 Total 312 888
Star Grades : 5-star for 3.5-4, 4-star for 3.0-3.4, 3-star for 2.5-2.9, 2-star for2.0-2.4, 1-star for 1.5-1.9, 0-star for 0-1.4 (all values rounded off to nearest
integer) Star Grade: 3 - Star
Date of Audit conducted : Signature(s) of Audit Member(s)

You might also like