1 WWQ Standard_Comparative Chart_2013-9-1
1 WWQ Standard_Comparative Chart_2013-9-1
Standards Practiced in
India Bangladesh Sri Lanka Jordan Kuwait Oman Tunisia Nepal
S.N. Parameters Unit
Disposal to Disposal Disposal to Disposal to To Inland To Land To Public Ground Reuse and Reuse and Reuse and WW into Effluent to Effluent to Ammend
To
Inland Surface to Public Land for Marine Coastal Surface for Sewers Water Inland S Inland S Public ment
Streams Recharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Water (ISW) Sewer Irrigation Areas Water Irrigation with CETP Water Water Sewers ?
All efforts should be made
All efforts should be made All efforts should be made to remove colour and
to remove colour and to remove colour and
1 Colour and odour unpleasant odour as far as - unpleasant odour as far as
unpleasant odour as far as practicable.
practicable. practicable.
4 pH - 5.5 to 9 5.5 to 9 5.5 to 9 5.5 to 9 6 to 9 - 5.5 to 10 6 to 9 6 to 9 6.5 to 8.5 6 to 9 6.5 to 8.5 5.5 to 9 5.5 to 9 5.5 to 9
Shall not exceed 5 0C Shall not exceed 5°C summer-40, summer-40,
5 Temperature °C, max. above the receiving - - above the receiving water
winter-45 winter-45 45 40 40 45
water temperature temperature
Radioactive –
alpha emitters - - - - - - -
Radioactive –
- - - - - - -
beta emitters
Bioassay - - - - - - -
C/N Ratio - - - - - - -
Source: Adopted from Andrew C. C., Albert L. P., Asano T., and Hesphanhol I., “Developing human health related chemical guidelines for recla
ountries for
India India
All soil Leachate
6.5-8.5 5.5-9.0
- 2100
20030 -
-2000 600
- -
100- 100
-90 -
- -
200100 200
-3000 -
- -
-10 -
-100 -
-100 -
-500 -
-5000 -
1000 -
-500 -
-1 -
- -
-200 -
-50 -
-5000 -
200 200
10000 5000
- -
10 -8
7-Oct -
90% fish
survival in 96 -
hrs
- -
ated chemical guidelines for reclaimed wastewater irrigation,” Water Science & Technology, 33(10–11), 463–472
Annexure 3: Standards for compost quality notified under MSW
Rules 2000
Parameters Concentration not to exceed * (mg/kg dry basis , except pH value and C/N ratio)
Arsenic 10
Cadmium 5
Chromium 50
Copper 300
Lead 100
Mercury 0.15
Nickel 50
Zinc 1000
PH 5.5-8.5
Annexure 4: Standards for Leachate Quality from solid wastes dump sites as notified
under MSW Rules 2000
Land disposal
200
2100
5.5 to 9.0
100
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.2
600
-
-
Annexure 5: Comparative analysis of various technologies
Process technology type Land requirement Operation and maintenance cost Energy requirement
Activated Sludge
0.15 to 0.25 hectares / MLD installed Rs 0.3 to 0.5 million / year/
180 to 225 Kwh/ ML treated
capacity MLD installed capacity
Process
treated
Energy required for the
Waste Stabilization
0.8 to 2.3 hectares/ MLD installed Rs 0.06 to 0.1 million/year/ operation of screen and
capacity MLD installed capacity grit chamber, negligible as
Ponds (WSP)
compared to ASP
Upflow anaerobic sludge 0.2 to 0.3 hectares/MLD installed Rs 0.08 to 0.17 million/ year / 10 to 15 KWh / ML sewage
blanket (UASB) capacity MLD installed capacity treated
Rotating 1biological
NA NA Very low as compared to ASP
contractor (RBC)
Fluidized Aerobic 0.06 Hectares / MLD installed 0.5 – 0.75 million/year/ MLD 99-170 KWh / ML
capacity installed capacity
Bed (FAB) sewage treated
Submerged Aerobic Fixed 0.05 hectares / MLD installed 1.14 million/ year /MLD 390 KWh /ML
Film (SAFF) reactor capacity installed capacity
treated
Membrane bioreactor
0.035 hectares / MLD installed Rs 0.6 to 0.75 million/ year /
180 to 220 KWh/ ML treated
capacity MLD installed capacity
(MBR)
Process technology type Land requirement Operation and maintenance cost Energy requirement
Septic tank with soak pit 0.2 hectares / MLD installed capacity NA Very low power required
Duckweed pond system 2-6 hectares / MLD installed Rs 0.18 million/ year / MLD It is much less as compared to
(DPS) capacity installed capacity ASP
Duckweed pond system 2-6 hectares / MLD installed Rs 0.18 million/ year / MLD It is much less as compared to
(DPS) capacity installed capacity ASP
Root zone treatment system 0.1 to 0.2 hectares /MLD installed Rs 0.05 million/ year /MLD
Energy requirement is very low
(RZT) capacity installed capacity
Source: 1. Compendium of Sewage Treatment Technologies by Vinod Tare and Purnendu Bose
Capital cost Effluent quality Distinct advantage
100 mg/L
Ease of installation and commissioning. Simple
NA Comparable to ASP
to operate and maintain
BOD< 5 mg/L Total Suspended
Higher than
solids (TSS): The process is time controlled and flexible
ASP <10mg/L
BOD < 10mg/L Suspended
3-5 million/ MLD installed solids(SS): No sludge recycling and monitoring of MLSS
capacity required
<20mg/L
BOD < 10mg/L Suspended
Rs 7 million / MLD installed solids(SS): More compact than the conventional STP’s
capacity
<20mg/L
BOD < 5 mg/L Suspended
Rs 3-5 million/ MLD installed solids(SS): Highest effluent quality for reuse and very
capacity <10mg/L colorless water is high life cycle cost
obtained