Scribd
Upload
19 views1 page

RUBRICS FOR FIELD STUDY PORTFOLIO

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating FS portfolios across five categories: Observation/Documentation, Analysis, Reflection, Portfolio organization, and Submission timing. Each category is rated on a scale from 1.0 to 4.0, with specific criteria detailing the quality of work expected at each level. The rubric emphasizes the importance of completeness, clarity, depth of analysis, and timely submission.

Uploaded by

MsDonna Arellano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
19 views1 page

RUBRICS FOR FIELD STUDY PORTFOLIO

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating FS portfolios across five categories: Observation/Documentation, Analysis, Reflection, Portfolio organization, and Submission timing. Each category is rated on a scale from 1.0 to 4.0, with specific criteria detailing the quality of work expected at each level. The rubric emphasizes the importance of completeness, clarity, depth of analysis, and timely submission.

Uploaded by

MsDonna Arellano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

RUBRICS FOR FS PORTFOLIO

1.75 2.50 4.0


1.0

Observation/ Has 100% of the needed content with All or nearly all were done with high Nearly all tasks were done Fewer than half of tasks were
Documentation outstanding quality quality with acceptable quality done with poor quality

Analysis Analysis questions were answered Analysis questions were answered Analysis answers were of Analysis questions were not
completely; in depth answers, best completely ; of better quality; acceptable quality; some answered.
quality, well selected and very were well selected and
substantial; grounded on theories substantial

Reflection Reflection statements are profound, Reflection statements are clear but not Reflection statements are Reflection statements are
clear and supported by experiences clearly supported by experiences from shallow; supported by unclear and shallow and are
from the episode the episodes experiences from the not supported by experiences
episode from the episode

Portfolio Portfolio is complete, clear, well- Portfolio is complete, clear, well- Portfolio is incomplete; Portfolio has many lacking
organized and all supporting organized and most supporting supporting documentation is components; is unorganized
documentation are located in sections documentation are available and /or in organized but is lacking. and unclear.
clearly designated. logical and clearly marked locations.

Submission Before deadline On the deadline A day after the deadline 2 days or more after the
deadline

RUBRICS FOR FS PORTFOLIO

1.75 2.50 4.0


1.0

Observation/ Has 100% of the needed content with All or nearly all were done with high Nearly all tasks were done Fewer than half of tasks were
Documentation outstanding quality quality with acceptable quality done with poor quality

Analysis Analysis questions were answered Analysis questions were answered Analysis answers were of Analysis questions were not
completely; in depth answers, best completely ; of better quality; acceptable quality; some answered.
quality, well selected and very were well selected and
substantial; grounded on theories substantial

Reflection Reflection statements are profound, Reflection statements are clear but not Reflection statements are Reflection statements are
clear and supported by experiences clearly supported by experiences from shallow; supported by unclear and shallow and are
from the episode the episodes experiences from the not supported by experiences
episode from the episode

Portfolio Portfolio is complete, clear, well- Portfolio is complete, clear, well- Portfolio is incomplete; Portfolio has many lacking
organized and all supporting organized and most supporting supporting documentation is components; is unorganized
documentation are located in sections documentation are available and /or in organized but is lacking. and unclear.
clearly designated. logical and clearly marked locations.

Submission Before deadline On the deadline A day after the deadline 2 days or more after the
deadline

You might also like