Download Primary Science Teaching Theory and Practice 4th Edition Achieving Qts John Sharp ebook file with all chapters
Download Primary Science Teaching Theory and Practice 4th Edition Achieving Qts John Sharp ebook file with all chapters
https://ebookultra.com/download/primary-science-for-teaching-
assistants-1st-edition-rosemar-feasey/
https://ebookultra.com/download/good-pharmaceutical-manufacturing-
practice-rationale-and-compliance-1st-edition-john-sharp/
https://ebookultra.com/download/primary-health-care-theory-and-
practice-1st-edition-trisha-greenhalgh/
https://ebookultra.com/download/primary-ict-extending-knowledge-in-
practice-1st-edition-john-duffty/
Cryptography Theory and Practice 4th Edition Douglas
Robert Stinson
https://ebookultra.com/download/cryptography-theory-and-practice-4th-
edition-douglas-robert-stinson/
https://ebookultra.com/download/software-engineering-theory-and-
practice-4th-ed-edition-s-pfleeger/
https://ebookultra.com/download/software-engineering-theory-and-
practice-4th-edition-shari-lawrence-pfleeger/
https://ebookultra.com/download/engineering-noise-control-theory-and-
practice-4th-edition-david-bies/
https://ebookultra.com/download/skilled-interpersonal-communication-
research-theory-and-practice-4th-edition-owen-hargie/
Primary Science Teaching Theory and Practice 4th
Edition Achieving Qts John Sharp Digital Instant
Download
Author(s): John Sharp, Graham Peacock, Rob Johnsey, Shirley Simon, Robin
Smith
ISBN(s): 9781844452798, 1844452794
Edition: 4
File Details: PDF, 1.45 MB
Year: 2009
Language: english
Achieving QTS
Meeting the Professional Standards Framework
Primary
Science
Teaching Theory and Practice
Achieving QTS
Meeting the Professional Standards Framework
Primary
Science
Teaching Theory and Practice
Fourth edition
www.learningmatters.co.uk
Achieving QTS
Meeting the Professional Standards Framework
Primary
Science
Teaching Theory and Practice
Fourth edition
www.learningmatters.co.uk
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Jill Jesson for her work on updating Chapter 10 on
Using ICT in science for the 4th edition.
# 2009 John Sharp, Graham Peacock, Rob Johnsey, Shirley Simon, Robin Smith,
Alan Cross and Diane Harris.
The right of John Sharp, Graham Peacock, Rob Johnsey, Shirley Simon, Robin
Smith, Alan Cross and Diane Harris to be identified as the Authors of this work
has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act 1988.
Learning Matters
33 Southernhay East
Exeter EX1 1NX
Tel: 01392 215560
[email protected]
www.learningmatters.co.uk
Contents
1 Introduction 1
4 Children’s ideas 24
6 Teaching strategies 51
7 Planning 64
Glossary 137
Index 141
v
1
Introduction
1
Introduction
. the reasons why it is important for all children to learn science and the value of engaging all
children’s interest in science;
. the nature of scientific understanding;
. key aspects of science underpinning children’s progress in acquiring scientific knowledge,
understanding and skills and how progress is recognised and encouraged;
. methods of developing children’s scientific knowledge, understanding and skills;
. ways of organising and managing science in the classroom;
. assessing and evaluating science teaching and learning;
. the importance of health and safety;
. the benefits of using ICT in science.
2
Introduction
Science in the National Curriculum also presents some information on the contexts
in which primary science should be taught, links to other subjects, technological
application, health and safety and the use of ICT.
The Teacher’s Guide which accompanies the Scheme of Work indicates that, in
their long- and medium-term planning, schools may wish to consider alternative
sequences of Units. This is, indeed, sound advice!
3
Introduction
Key Stage 1
Year 1 Units Year 2 Units
1A Ourselves 2A Health and growth
1B Growing plants 2B Plants and animals in the local
1C Sorting and using materials environment
1D Light and dark 2C Variation
1E Pushes and pulls 2D Grouping and changing materials
1F Sound and hearing 2E Forces and movement
2F Using electricity
Key Stage 2
Year 3 Units Year 4 Units
3A Teeth and eating 4A Moving and growing
3B Helping plants grow well 4B Habitats
3C Characteristics of materials 4C Keeping warm
3D Rocks and soils 4D Solids, liquids and how they can be
3E Magnets and springs separated
3F Light and shadows 4E Friction
4F Circuits and conductors
Year 5 Units Year 6 Units
5A Keeping healthy 6A Interdependence and adaptation
5B Life cycles 6B Micro-organisms
5C Gases around us 6C More about dissolving
5D Changing state 6D Reversible and irreversible reactions
5E Earth, Sun and Moon 6E Forces in action
5F Changing sounds 6F How we see things
6G Changing circuits
5/6H Enquiry in environmental/technological
contexts
4
2
The nature of scientific understanding
Professional attributes
Q4 Communicate effectively with children, young people, colleagues, parents
and carers.
Introduction
This chapter discusses the very nature of scientific understanding and explores the
implications for teaching science in schools. All of us behave in different ways as
we learn more about the world around us. Often, however, how and what we learn
leads to our own ‘personal’ understanding rather than that shared and accepted by
the scientific community. While not everyone will become a professional scientist,
those who use more scientific methods are more likely to have a more realistic
understanding of how things are, unlike those who depend on hearsay or make
inaccurate observations and poor interpretations.
It is easy to see why science has gained the reputation it has in the past. In order to
survive an often hostile world, it has been very important to establish how that
world behaves and to predict what will happen next. The notion that science can
provide watertight explanations and reasons is one we would like to believe in.
Unfortunately science cannot always provide clear-cut answers to everything
although many would like to believe so. In fact, the methods employed in science,
and the body of knowledge which has been accumulated, provide only the best
5
The nature of scientific understanding
explanations we have so far, based on the evidence gathered and the interpreta-
tions put on that evidence.
It is true to say that there is some science that we are very sure about, largely
because all the evidence collected over a long time points towards its validity. Thus
we are fairly sure that a force due to gravity will always pull an object which is close
to the Earth downwards, and plants need a source of light in order to grow health-
ily. However, a scientist would say that if one day we found evidence that things do
not always fall towards the Earth, we should then be prepared to change our views
about how gravity works.
The ideas that are commonly accepted by the scientific community form the knowl-
edge and understanding part of any educational curriculum and provide the ideas
that scientists use to build new concepts and theories. While we should be ready to
consider and reinterpret new evidence, we have to believe in some things or we
may never leave our own homes for fear of floating off into outer space! At the
same time, however, we must realise (and make others realise, too) that many
ideas in science can never actually be proven but they can certainly be falsified.
IN THE CLASSROOM
Some teachers in a primary school noticed that often their children would be
noisier and more agitated on windy days. The children came to school across
a windy playground where the leaves themselves seemed to be swept up in
frenzied excitement. Over a period of time other teachers in the school made
the same observation. Some teachers in the school claimed that their own
classrooms were always calm despite the weather conditions outside.
Observations at playtime on windy days, however, showed that the children
from these classes were also particularly excited outside of their own
classroom.
Over a period the group of teachers talked to colleagues from other schools
and also read articles which supported their ideas about children’s behaviour
on windy days. The teachers formed a theory concerning the children’s
behaviour which was supported by keen observation and the collection of a
range of evidence. The theory built up over a period of time and in some
teachers’ minds became fact.
There are a number of points about the nature of scientific understanding which
this story can illustrate.
. The teachers had clarified their ideas about children’s behaviour and windy days by making a
general statement based on their initial experiences. Scientific understanding is based on
previously accumulated knowledge which may be expressed in terms of generalisations.
. Over a period of time they checked their ideas against new evidence and found them to be
consistent with this evidence. The more evidence that supports an idea, the more we might
accept it as valid.
. However, even now, they cannot be sure that their ideas provide the best explanation because
future observations may disprove them (in which case new, modified ideas may emerge).
Scientific ideas are often tentative.
. As the teachers made more observations and developed ideas about why the children behaved
6
The nature of scientific understanding
as they did, a theory emerged which could be tested. As long as the theory was supported by
evidence it could be usefully employed by some teachers to predict their children’s behaviour and
adapt the day’s work to suit this. A successful theory will enable successful predictions to be
made.
. An educational researcher might have been able to take a more scientific approach to testing
this theory by making more reliable, consistent and repeated observations. Interpretation of this
evidence might have produced a more sophisticated theory which linked weather conditions to
the general behaviour of the children, or disproved the theory altogether. The quality of
scientific knowledge and understanding is dependent on the quality of the scientific skills used
to gather evidence and interpret it.
The tentative nature of all scientific ideas can be illustrated by putting ourselves in
the place of those who believed the earth was flat. This view of the world made a
great deal of sense to most people who very rarely ventured far from home and
could see with their own eyes an approximately flat landscape. This view of the
world was acceptable and worked for those people on a day-to-day basis. Only
when travellers and explorers confirmed that there was no ‘edge’ to the world and
people began to notice that the masts of ships appeared first over the horizon was
this view challenged. The evidence simply did not fit. Nowadays we have even
more evidence that the Earth is almost spherical in photographs from outer space.
If, however, new photographs began to show that the Earth was doughnut shaped
(unlikely of course), we would have to change our minds on the subject and
develop new ideas!
7
The nature of scientific understanding
the Church for suggesting a theory which put the Sun at the centre of our solar
system with our rather insignificant earth orbiting it. The Church had taught an
Earth-centred view of the Universe and felt compelled to suppress the scientific
evidence that Galileo produced. Modern debates over scientific developments can
be influenced as much by politics and prejudice as by hard scientific evidence.
Interpretations of evidence can be purposely or inadvertently misleading as a result
of the interpreter’s moral or ethical stance. Commercial pressures can encourage
unscrupulous groups to misconstrue evidence or even falsify it. In short, scientific
progress can be hindered and distorted in a variety of ways.
8
The nature of scientific understanding
McCormick concluded that the information needed in the practical context was subtly different
to that gained in the more theoretical science lesson. He called this knowledge ‘device knowl-
edge’. This suggests something about the nature of science knowledge as taught in schools
and points towards a need for greater links to be made between this type of knowledge and
the device knowledge often used in the practical world.
The National Curriculum for science in primary schools appears to be set out
largely in terms of science facts and concepts (Sc2, 3 and 4). These are the ‘big’
science ideas about which we are fairly certain and which are deemed appropriate
for primary-age children to understand. It is right that teachers teach these ideas as
firmly held concepts but this should be done alongside stories about the some-
times tentative nature of modern science and about how some old ideas have been
modified or replaced throughout history. At the same time teachers will want to
teach the skills described in Sc1 – Science enquiry – to illustrate the way in which
scientific ideas have been arrived at in the past and are arrived at today.
MOVING ON > > > > > > MOVING ON > > > > > > MOVING ON
During your Induction year you will be expected to develop a secure knowledge and under-
standing of the subject areas you teach (Professional Standards for Teachers, I 15). Use the
Further Reading section which follows to discover what others believe about the nature of
science.
9
The nature of scientific understanding
Peacock, G. A. (2002) Teaching Science in Primary Schools. London: Letts. A clear but brief
introduction to the intricacies of teaching science in the primary school.
10
3
Processes and methods of scientific
enquiry
Professional attributes
Q4 Communicate effectively with children, young people, colleagues, parents
and carers.
Q7(a) Reflect on and improve their practice, and take responsibility for iden-
tifying and meeting their developing professional needs.
Professional skills
Q22 Plan for progression across the age and ability range for which they are
trained, designing effective learning sequences within lessons and across
series of lessons and demonstrating secure subject/curriculum knowledge.
Q25 Teach lessons and sequences of lessons across the age and ability range
for which they are trained in which they:
(a) use a range of teaching strategies and resources, including e-learning,
taking practical account of diversity and promoting equality and inclusion;
(b) build on prior knowledge, develop concepts and processes, enable lear-
ners to apply new knowledge, understanding and skills, and meet learning
objectives.
Q28 Support and guide learners to reflect on their learning, identify the
progress they have made and identify their emerging learning needs.
11
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
Introduction
IN THE CLASSROOM
A class of six- and seven-year-olds were working in the small garden the
school had created. The tasks for the day were planting and weeding but
several children had become fascinated by the small creatures they found as
they worked. One group looked under stones and discovered more. Some
children had names for creatures they saw. Others pointed out how they
moved. Their teacher had not planned for this to be the focus of the science
but it fitted the school scheme of work well, since they were studying the
variety of life and conditions for living things. She recognised its potential to
develop scientific enquiry from the children’s curiosity and interest. Before
they went any further she talked with them about being careful not to harm
any creatures. Some children wanted to make homes for the ones they had
found. The teacher asked what they thought these would have to be like in
order to start them thinking about the types of environment which different
animals needed. She anticipated helping them investigate the conditions
which the small animals preferred, working with them to devise simple tests
of light/dark, damp/dry.
The class had already been shown how to use a magnifying glass and
viewers, so they would be able to make closer observations to check the
claims they were making about how many legs each creature had. The
teacher thought that drawing and maybe modelling might improve the
observations. That would also help them compare different animals with
pictures in books and she could introduce simple keys and some software the
school had. Grouping pictures, sorting activities and games might help
children get an idea of a simple classification. At present some of them were
using terms like worm and insect but there were lots of disagreements over
what to call each new find. The teacher could see opportunities for language
work in these debates, and there would be maths to apply in drawing charts
or graphs if they found lots of things. She could also see some challenges in
organising all this – not least with the two children who didn’t want to have
anything to do with ’creepy-crawlies’.
During Key Stage 1 pupils observe, explore and ask questions about living
things, materials and phenomena. They begin to work together to collect
evidence to help them answer questions and to link this to simple scientific
ideas. They evaluate evidence and consider whether tests or comparisons are
fair. They use reference materials to find out more about scientific ideas. They
share their ideas and communicate them in language, drawing, charts and
tables. (p. 78)
12
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
When they build on this during Key Stage 2 one sign of progress is that children
carry out more scientific investigations.
Investigations are not simply practical work. Practical activities may be used for
various reasons, for instance to illustrate a scientific concept, to teach a specific skill
or to foster observation. These are all worthwhile. However, it is important to be
clear about the purpose of any activity – for example, giving children a detailed set
of instructions to follow so they reach a predetermined result may be appropriate if
we are aiming to teach skills or to reinforce ideas. But this is not the same as
children carrying out investigations where the aim is to allow them to use and to
develop concepts, skills and procedural understanding. When they are investigat-
ing, children have some responsibility for deciding what to do and how to do it.
They should be encouraged to think for themselves, to use their knowledge and
skills, and to extend their understanding.
. raising questions;
. identifying and controlling variables;
. planning;
. observing/measuring;
. analysing data;
. interpreting results;
. deciding how far their findings answer their original question;
. evaluating their work.
A whole investigation may include all these features. However, we often support
children by organising investigations so that they can concentrate on a few aspects.
We also have to teach them the skills and knowledge that they need in order to
carry out investigations. Although children are taking responsibility for their inves-
tigation, teachers have an active part to play – they are not simply providing hands-
on experiences nor adopting a discovery approach to science learning.
13
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
2. How might you organise the activity if you want to ensure all the children get a good set
of results that can be used to see patterns in results and a relationship between the height
of drop and height bounced?
3. How might you organise the activity if you want to extend children’s skills at planning a
fair test where the key variables are tested and others are controlled?
4. How might you organise the activity if you want children to carry out an investigation of
their own?
Make notes or draft a lesson plan for each of these different objectives.
. Are they making use of what they already know to pose their question and predict what might
happen?
. Have they thought about different ways their question could be investigated?
. What skills have they learned already that would help them with the investigation?
14
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
are going to control, i.e. keep the same, and which they will change. By trying out
their ideas practically they may find other things which affect the results. Teachers
need a good understanding themselves of the skills and ideas that the tasks may
demand – for instance, being able to use a thermometer, knowing the difference
between heat and temperature. They have to be aware of practical difficulties and
safety issues – can the water be hot enough for the children to get good results?
And they also need to be alert to what the children are thinking – for example, do
they expect water to go on cooling to zero rather than room temperature? Do they
interpret ‘fair’ as meaning everybody has a go?
Planning investigations
In order to plan their own investigations, children need to be able to think ahead,
anticipating what they will do and what equipment they will need, how they will
record their findings and what they will do with the results. This is demanding and
they will need a lot of help. In the early stages teachers will do most of the planning
for the children but should aim to involve them and make them aware of the
process. Even young children can be given responsibility for planning part of an
investigation. In their play they imagine and organise their activities. As they colla-
borate in groups and extend their communication skills children become able to
take on more of the planning themselves. For teachers in primary schools nowa-
days there is a tension between fostering this independence and following the
prescribed curriculum. Rachel Sparks Linfield (2007) draws on her experience
across the age range in describing how the National Curriculum, and particularly
SATs, have restricted opportunities for children to pursue extended investigations.
15
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
She makes the argument for regaining time to enable them to investigate their
questions.
When they have had some experience of science activities children can do more
systematic planning of their investigations. Many teachers have found planning
sheets helpful to structure this and to support children. These can be provided
through a computer, on paper or on a larger-scale board. A few key headings or
questions direct children’s attention to things they should think about before they
start. For instance, for a ‘fair test’ kind of investigation.
The headings should prompt children to think through the stages of an investiga-
tion one at a time. They can help them focus their attention, be organised and think
ahead to consider alternatives or problems. They might be referred to as a remin-
der during their investigation. The structure can also reinforce children’s
understanding of the procedures involved in an investigation. However, we
should beware that such aids do not become straitjackets. Planning sheets usually
emphasise one sort of investigation, the fair test. They may also become a routine
or even a ritual, taking time and attention away from the investigation itself.
So we need to be clear about our purpose for requiring the children to plan – and to
share the purpose with them.
. Is it so they are more likely to do an appropriate investigation for the question they posed?
. Because they might miss important observations?
. So they think about the variables that need to be controlled?
. Because they have to plan what measurements to take and get the equipment?
. Is our aim to increase their understanding of the scientific procedures in a whole investigation?
Science investigations can also serve a broader purpose across the curriculum: fostering
children’s creativity and their thinking skills.
Think about investigations you have done with or might plan to do with children.
1. What can a teacher do in order to encourage children to generate lots of possible ways of
investigating a question?
2. How might children be helped to discuss one another’s ideas and decide on the most
appropriate ways?
3. How confident would you be at letting children follow up their own ideas even if they
looked like being unsuccessful? How do you decide whether to intervene?
For ideas look at articles on creativity in issue 81 of Primary Science Review, and articles on
questions in issues 83, 90 and 105.
16
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
The questions and problems that lead to investigations are often the result of
observations, especially of noticing surprising features or unusual events.
Observing is not simply looking or listening but is a deliberate act influenced by
our expectations and experience. As children gain more scientific knowledge they
can be asked to use that to inform their observations. In investigations they should
be drawing upon their scientific ideas from the start. Observation features at later
stages as well. Some kinds of investigation depend on lots of carefully recorded
observations to see if there are any patterns, for example if they want to investigate
food preferences of birds visiting a school bird table. Children have to be prepared
to make these – they may have to get equipment, practise using it, and decide
when to make and how to record their observations. Some investigations combine
qualitative records and measurement, for instance if they trace the germination and
growth of plants under various conditions or keep a record of the weather.
Measuring is a key feature of science, although not all scientific work by children
will involve measurement. Children need to see the purpose for measuring in their
investigations. They should be helped to think about what they are going to
measure and how they can do so. If they are going to need to use measuring
instruments do they already know how to? Have they been taught how to use them
appropriately? Are they seeking to be accurate and are they aware of errors?
Consider, for instance, children carrying out a very common activity, rolling vehi-
cles they have made down slopes to see which runs fastest. Children often opt to
time these using a digital watch or stopclock and report their results. However, the
error in switching the clock on and off can be considerable, and they need to realise
this and to consider what else they might measure.
In tests like this children are often expected to make repeated measurements. This
is good practice but once again we have to be careful that they learn to do it with
understanding.
Some of the equipment they will use during investigations may be met first in
maths when they measure time, length, weight and volume. As they progress
through simple comparison, use of non-standard measurements to standard
measures they acquire skills that they can use in science. They are also learning
about accuracy and choice of the appropriate scale. Other equipment such as
spring balances to measure forces or thermometers may be introduced in science
lessons. They will need to be taught how to use these with skill and understanding,
for example beginning with learning to read a simple scale on sturdy thermo-
meters, progressing to recognising the range they can measure using more
sensitive instruments, handling them carefully, and reducing errors by waiting
17
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
for the instruments to reach a steady reading. At level 3 they are expected to be
able to use a range of simple equipment to measure quantities like mass and
length; by level 5 they should be selecting apparatus, planning how to use it,
making a series of measurements with appropriate precision, and beginning to
repeat measurements.
ICT (Information and Communication Technology) has brought new aids such as
dataloggers with sensors that children can use to make and record measurements
(see p. 112). These devices and software can help them handle the data they
produce, see patterns and relationships and communicate it. The links between
the maths, science and ICT curricula are most obvious in the area of data handling.
18
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
lot of help but they only made one measurement for each, using a metre rule. This
sort of graph was familiar to them. The second graph was drawn by the most able
children in the class who practised first in order to measure the height of bounce as
accurately as possible. Then they fixed a scale on the wall, dropped the ball at 10
cm intervals, made three readings for each and took the median value. They
realised that a line graph could be drawn to show the relationship between the
two heights. In a previous investigation of cooling they had plotted points for
temperatures and had learnt to draw a line of best fit. When they drew this one
they decided after discussion that they could take the line back to zero, even though
when they had dropped the ball from less than 40 cm they had not got reliable
measurements.
19
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
As well as acquiring these skills and the procedural understanding to apply them,
children at level 5 and above should be using their data to draw conclusions which
are based on evidence and which relate to scientific ideas. This is the purpose of
doing whole investigations. But the skills to enable this sometimes have to be
taught separately and then put together. In some ways interpreting results is the
hardest of these. It requires the child to scrutinise data for patterns, to relate the
findings to their predictions yet be open to unexpected results, and to draw on
scientific ideas while their understanding is limited. There is plenty that teachers
can do to help children with this as they progress through the primary school.
. Talk about patterns and regularities in everyday events, for example daily cycles or shadow
lengths.
. Draw attention to phenomena which indicate relationships, for example how seedlings grow
towards a window or how many snails are about on wet days.
. Display children’s work so that patterns are apparent and discuss them, for example the
shadows cast by a puppet figure at different distances from a lamp or the order in which
parachutes of different sizes fell. Include questions in displays.
. Ask them to refer back to their predictions when they discuss the results of a test they did.
. Organise activities where measurement reveals relationships, for example between pulse rates
and exercise.
. Provide tables or graphs with results for children to analyse and discuss, for example elastic
bands stretched by loading masses. Introduce some with less tidy sets of results and ask for
their explanations, for example the distance travelled by cotton reels powered by turns of
elastic band or the readings on a spring balance pulling increasing loads.
. When they report their findings ask children to provide explanations and suggest reasons if
any of their results do not fit the pattern.
. Encourage them to give reasons based on their science studies when they predict and offer
explanations.
. Establish a climate where children challenge one another’s explanations and offer alternative
interpretations and listen to one another.
Evaluating
Evaluating is valuable for improving investigations and developing procedural
understanding. However, it should not become a ritual or a chore. Nor do we want
children to feel defensive about their work. Specific, focused questions will be
more helpful at first rather than general enquiries about how they could make it
better. For example, if children were recording something changing over time, ask
how they decided when to take measurements, whether any measurements
needed to be checked, what was difficult, what worked well. As children become
more capable at planning investigations they can look back at their plan to see how
closely they followed it, what adjustments they had to make as they went and how
they would advise another group to tackle the same question. If several groups
investigate similar questions they can compare their findings and discuss why they
may not have the same results. The time available for repeating and refining
investigations is limited so we need to make the best use of any opportunities.
Much of the evaluation can occur as children talk about the work they are doing.
We also have to bear in mind that children often find science stimulating because
they are actively engaged in practical work and trying out their own ideas. Teachers
need to listen and watch them at work in order to judge whether a question will
20
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
Moving up the age range Stephen Lunn (2006) reports how a teacher with 4–6 year olds and
later with 7–9 year olds built on their ideas and fostered imagination by using charts of ’what
do we know’ and ’what do we wonder’; these stimulated questioning, developed the children’s
confidence to offer ideas, and modelled scientific thinking.
At the top of Key Stage 2 Richard Watkins (2005) researched the scientific reasoning of the
children in his Year 6 class. He gave them statements reflecting either inductive or deductive
reasoning to discuss in small groups. Most children could identify limitations of inductive
reasoning as a basis for making predictions about objects not yet examined on the basis of
information from those already examined.
Watkins teaches Sc1 across the curriculum and also dedicates lessons specifically to teaching
investigative skills, including questions of reliability and accuracy. Children are encouraged to
think aloud and explain their reasoning. His account illustrates both the creation of a climate
to foster children’s own ideas and the rigorous teaching of skills enabling them to make
progression in their scientific thinking.
MOVING ON > > > > > > MOVING ON > > > > > > MOVING ON
As you become more familiar with children in your class during your Induction year you will be able
to plan to assess individual needs and abilities in the context of investigations. This information
should be used to set individual targets and assist children to reflect on their own learning.
21
Processes and methods of scientific enquiry
22
4
Children’s ideas
Professional attributes
Q4 Communicate effectively with children, young people, colleagues, parents
and carers.
Q6 Have a commitment to collaboration and co-operative working.
Professional skills
Q22 Plan for progression across the age and ability range for which they are
trained, designing effective learning sequences within lessons and across
series of lessons and demonstrating secure subject/curriculum knowledge.
Q25 Teach lessons and sequences of lessons across the age and ability range
for which they are trained in which they:
(a) use a range of teaching strategies and resources, including e-learning,
taking practical account of diversity and promoting equality and inclusion;
(b) build on prior knowledge, develop concepts and processes, enable lear-
ners to apply new knowledge, understanding and skills and meet learning
objectives;
(c) adapt their language to suit the learners they teach, introducing new ideas
and concepts clearly, and using explanations, questions, discussions and
plenaries effectively;
(d) manage the learning of individuals, groups and whole classes, modifying
their teaching to suit the stage of the lesson.
Q29 Evaluate the impact of their teaching on the progress of all learners, and
modify their planning and classroom practice where necessary.
23
Children’s ideas
Introduction
Children’s learning
To understand how children learn science, and the importance of children’s ideas
in the learning process, teachers need to have some knowledge of the nature of
children’s learning.
Many developments in science education in the past 25 years have been influenced
by constructivist and social constructivist theories of learning. In essence, a
constructivist view of learning suggests that learning involves an active process
in which each learner is engaged in constructing meanings, whether from physical
experiences, dialogue or texts. A constructivist perspective has underpinned many
studies into children’s ideas undertaken in different parts of the world. Highly
influential projects include the New Zealand Learning in Science Project (LISP),
the Children’s Learning in Science Project (CLISP) and the primary Science
Process and Concepts Exploration (SPACE) project. The following Research
Summary provides an overview of some of this work.
Studying the characteristics and limitations of children’s ideas gives us clues as to how to
help children change their ideas to come closer to the scientific ones. (Harlen, 2007, p. 14)
Some more recent research has examined how children’s ideas may change over several
years, questioning the stability of individual’s ideas and the assumption that there is an
24
Children’s ideas
orderly, sequential growth of concepts (Tytler and Peterson, 2005). In one study the research-
ers worked with and interviewed 12 primary school pupils each year from the age of 5. They
studied children’s understanding of a number of topics, e.g. changes to materials and evapora-
tion. They found that:
. children’s explanations were very context dependent, and there was no simple pathway
which children followed as their understanding progressed;
. even where children seemed to be voicing the same conception they differed in how they
represented it and what they meant;
. each child had a relatively coherent way of approaching learning and knowledge, linked with
the ways they saw themselves as learners and school children;
Overall the research indicates how we not only need to take account of the ideas children bring
to their science learning but also the wider agenda they bring to activities which we as
teachers may introduce.
The research into children’s ideas has shown several features which will now be
considered separately in order to emphasise their importance in the teaching and
learning of science. The way in which children’s ideas can be addressed in teaching
is referred to in later sections, which include reference to constructivist teaching
approaches.
Without further discussion with the children it is difficult to tell what they mean by
short statements such as these.
25
Children’s ideas
The SPACE project also found that some children expressed ideas which are more
closely related to scientific views than those shown above.
A further feature of children’s ideas is that they can be very specific to particular
contexts. A study exploring children’s understanding of balanced forces demon-
strated the way in which children’s explanations of the same underlying principle
can be different in different contexts. In the study children were presented with two
different situations involving balanced forces, a box suspended from a piece of
elastic and a box supported on a bendy bridge. Children were often inconsistent in
the way they identified downward and upward forces acting on the box, though the
same principle applied in each case (the upward force of the distorted material
balancing the downward force of gravity). Children tend to see different situations
as instances of different phenomena, so much so that they may switch from one
explanation to a contradictory one.
26
Children’s ideas
27
Children’s ideas
Over the five weeks that children were learning about living things Venville found various types
of change in their ideas but the predominant pattern of learning was the assimilation of facts
and information into the children’s preferred theory. Children with non-scientific theories of
living things were identified as being least able to benefit from socially constructed, scientific
knowledge.
Children – and indeed many adults – find that many scientific ideas are counter-
intuitive, in that they seem contrary to everyday experience. A typical example that
is difficult for many people to understand is that heavy objects fall through the air at
the same rate as lighter objects unless the lighter objects are slowed by air resis-
tance. Because so many objects, like feathers, are slowed by air resistance,
people’s experience tells them that heavy objects, like hammers, must fall more
quickly.
Think of an idea that you have had which you found hard to change to a more scientific view.
Write down your idea and an explanation for why you found it so resistant. In a small group
compare and discuss the difficulties that you and your colleagues experienced.
Having described some of the features of children’s ideas in this and the previous
section, the following sections focus on ways in which children’s ideas can be
elicited and their misconceptions addressed during teaching.
There are various methods that can be used for finding out about children’s ideas
which have been adopted in research and are used in teaching. The SPACE project
used informal classroom techniques for eliciting children’s ideas. The techniques
included the following.
28
Children’s ideas
. Using log-books – children could make drawings or do writing over a period of time, to
provide a record of long-term changes.
. Structured writing or drawing – children could write or draw responses to particular questions
from the teacher. Sometimes drawings could be annotated to clarify explanations.
. Completing a picture – children could be asked to add relevant points to a picture.
. Individual discussion – teachers could ask open questions and listen to children talking about
their ideas.
These techniques can be used in the classroom for exploring children’s ideas in a
range of science topics. In addition, the SPACE team used exploratory activities to
find out about children’s ideas. For example, in the topic of electricity, children
were provided with simple electrical materials, i.e. light bulbs, wires and batteries,
and then asked to draw the connections that would be needed to light a bulb on a
pre-drawn diagram of a bulb and battery. The drawing illustrates an example from
a nine-year-old child.
Finding out about children’s ideas requires a learning environment in which chil-
dren feel free to express their views. Some children require more confidence than
others to contribute their ideas, particularly if they feel that the teacher wants the
‘right answer’. Work undertaken by Keogh and Naylor over many years has
addressed this issue. Their highly successful concept cartoons were designed to
help children talk about ’other’ children’s ideas. More recently, Keogh and Naylor
have launched a major initiative to use large puppets to enhance children’s engage-
ment and talk in science. Research into the use of puppets has shown these to be a
useful teaching strategy for eliciting children’s ideas.
29
Children’s ideas
engagement and talk in science. In this project primary teachers used large hand-held puppets
to create characters that would express alternative ideas, so that children would more readily
respond and express their own ideas. The research has shown that children are not only keen
to tell the puppet what they know, but also listen more attentively when the puppets are used.
Children are more motivated to ask or answer questions and join in discussion.
Analysis of classroom talk before and after using puppets has shown that children are found to
use more reasoning when they talk in response to the puppets, justifying their ideas about
scientific concepts. Moreover, puppets have been shown to engage children who are usually
reluctant to contribute. Puppets have now been used successfully across the range of 4–11
years.
The research with puppets has helped to confirm the recent emphasis on the importance of
talk and social constructivist ideas in primary education. A useful booklet by Alexander (2004)
discusses the issue of talk in UK primary schools, where he raises the question:
Do we provide and promote the right kind of talk; and how can we strengthen its power to
help children think and learn more effectively than they do?
The theme of different kinds of talk in science classrooms is also usefully discussed by Asoko
and Scott (2006), and by Mercer et al. (2004) in their research, which has shown that children
using ’exploratory talk’ are able to achieve a better understanding of science.
30
Children’s ideas
example, to help children understand the idea that light travels in straight lines, they were
given the problem: ‘How could they make the light go round every side of the table?’ A strong
torch, mirrors and plasticene were provided and the children had to discuss a preliminary
solution before attempting the activity. The drawings they produced were used for discussion
with the teacher.
The techniques developed in the SPACE project characterise a constructivist teaching
approach. These include:
. building on children’s ideas through investigation, posing questions for children to consider
and providing opportunities to test ideas;
. testing the ‘right’ idea alongside the children’s ideas;
. making imperceptible changes perceptible, for example using evidence such as videos of
time-lapse photography of plant growth;
. helping children to generalise from one specific context to others;
. refining children’s use of vocabulary.
The potential of drawing is explored in a recent article by Brook (2007):
Drawing and visualisation can assist young children in their shift from everyday, or
spontaneous concepts, to more scientific concepts. When young children are able to
create visual representations of their ideas they are then more able to work at a
metacognitive level. When children are encouraged to revisit, revise and dialogue
through and with their drawing they are able to represent and explore increasingly
complex ideas. (p. 319)
Refer back to Anna’s ideas about living things. Discuss with a colleague different ways in
which Anna’s teacher could help her to change her ideas.
IN THE CLASSROOM
Fiona and the little black dot
Fiona asked the children to draw how they see a book. She then asked the
children to think about their drawings and to tell the whole class how they
thought they see things. Some children said ’eyes’ and ’light’, which Fiona
acknowledged, then one child said ’you need that little black dot in front of
your eye’. Fiona asked the children if they knew what this black dot was
called. One child gave ’pupil’, so Fiona then asked the children if they knew
what the pupil was. They could not answer this other than suggest ’to make
you see’, so Fiona used this idea of the pupil to provide the children with a
31
Children’s ideas
useful analogy which would help them to understand how light enters the
eye. She said:
It’s actually a hole. If you imagine your eyeballs are ping pong balls?
You’ve got a hole in the front and a cover on it so things don’t get in, what
you can see there is actually a hole. How many of you have been to the
doctor’s or been to see a nurse and they’ve looked into your eyes? The
thing is they are actually looking inside the hole at the back of your eyeball.
(Adapted from Simon, 2007)
Though analogies are useful, they can have limitations and children may take them
too far. A commonly used analogy when teaching about electric current is that the
current is like water flowing around a circuit. However, if the circuit is broken,
electric current does not leak out in a puddle, as water would. The same caution
applies to the use of physical models, though these are essential in science teach-
ing. Models are used to represent phenomena which are too large, too small or
difficult or impossible to see; a globe can be used to represent the Earth; marbles
can be used to show the arrangement of particles in solids, liquids and gases; a
model torso can show the organs of the body. When concrete models are used
teachers need to point out their limitations.
Working from children’s ideas can be challenging. Once a teacher has elicited
children’s ideas, decisions have to be made about how to respond to and value
these ideas. Also, there are management decisions about how to group children for
the purpose of testing out their ideas. Should children with the same ideas be
grouped, or is it better for children with different ideas to work together? It may
be that disagreement between children enables them to develop their ideas further.
There are other issues to be considered relating to the status of knowledge in the
classroom. For example, making children’s ideas the centre of attention by asking
for and accepting them may serve to reinforce them. In addition, a constructivist
approach may not result in children reaching a more scientific view, in which case
the children may be in the process of guessing the right answer in order to produce
it in a test. Teachers need clear objectives for learning within a constructivist
approach, and strategies for differentiation which enable children to learn through
appropriate discussion and activity.
32
Children’s ideas
MOVING ON > > > > > > MOVING ON > > > > > > MOVING ON
As you move into your induction year you will have opportunities to explore the children’s ideas in
more detail. You will begin to perceive patterns and commonly held beliefs about the physical world
and to experiment with approaches which challenge children’s ideas.
33
Children’s ideas
34
5
Science in the Foundation Stage
Professional attributes
Professional skills
Q23 Design opportunities for learners to develop their literacy, numeracy and
ICT skills.
Q24 Plan homework or other out-of-class work to sustain learners’ progress
and to extend and consolidate their learning.
Q25 Teach lessons and sequences of lessons across the age and ability range
for which they are trained in which they:
35
Science in the Foundation Stage
(b) build on prior knowledge, develop concepts and processes, enable lear-
ners to apply new knowledge, understanding and skills and meet learning
objectives;
(c) adapt their language to suit the learners they teach, introducing new ideas
and concepts clearly, and using explanations, questions, discussions and
plenaries effectively.
Introduction
By Early Years in England we mean from the child’s third birthday to the end of the
Reception year (a period of two to three years), a period which covers what is
known as the Foundation Stage. The Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) (DCSF,
2008a, b) sets the expectations for learning, development and care for children
from birth until the end of the August following the child’s fifth birthday (for
most children this is the end of the Reception year in primary school). The new
Practice Guidance for the EYFS splits the ages: birth–11 months, 8–20 months, 16–
26 months, 22–36 months, 30–50 months and 40–60+ months (which contains the
objectives for the Foundation Stage – the Early Learning Goals). We will follow
accepted practice here when we refer to practitioners rather than teachers as we
include any adult who works in ’out-of-home’ provision for Early Years children (i.e.
child minders, playgroups, pre-schools, school Nursery and Reception classes,
private day nurseries, family centres and independent schools).
A number of principles lie behind what we call Early Years education, these relate
to its active, experiential nature and that it promotes play and an increasing will-
ingness on the part of youngsters to participate, trial and explore alone and in social
groups. These principles include:
. a unique child;
. positive relationships;
. enabling environments;
. learning and development.
(DCSF, 2008)
36
Science in the Foundation Stage
There is a great tradition of science in Early Years education in which children have
been encouraged to take an interest in the natural world, to explore it and to
engage with appropriate questions. Almost two hundred years ago, Froebel
(1782–1852) recommended that structured play was essential for children’s cogni-
tive and social development but that this should be enhanced by access to a wide
variety of experiences to increase children’s understanding of both themselves and
the world around them (Bruce et al., 2004). More recently, Montessori (1870–1952)
suggested a different child-centred approach where learning is encouraged by
having a planned environment which has been tailored to the needs of young
children and where there is no time limit on exploration (Pound, 2005).
The most easily recognised science within the EYFS is ‘Exploration and
Investigation’ which is part of ’Knowledge and understanding of the world’.
’Exploration and Investigation’ is not taught in isolation from the other topics
contained within ‘Knowledge and understanding of the world’ or indeed any of
the other five areas of learning. Connections can be readily made between science,
literacy and numeracy and all three areas of learning can be developed very effec-
tively alongside one another. It is beneficial, however, that links are utilised and
made clear between all the areas of learning in the example below.
You might have included references to learning about: habitats; making an ideal home for a
snail; moving like animals; snail songs; caring for others, a snail trail poem; and other ideas.
While not always referred to as science, the experience and learning of young
children is recognisable to the science educator. For example:
. children bouncing balls on different surfaces to see which is the best surface for bouncing balls;
37
Another Random Scribd Document
with Unrelated Content
Rokitansky has traced respectively the development of the two
arterial trunks from the common trunk and of the septum
ventriculorum. He considers that the partitioning of the arterial
trunks is the governing factor in their formation, and that the
ventricular septum is arranged in conformity with the septum of
arterial trunks. In tracing the development of the circulatory
apparatus in man there seems to be no doubt that the heart
develops exactly like that of other vertebrates.
The foetal heart from the fourth week onward becomes more and
more rounded in outline, and finally more or less rectangular. The
auricular appendages become conspicuous and overhang the
ventricles. The future left ventricle appears larger than the right, and
the former projects notably leftward and downward. The aortic bulb
or common trunk appears to arise wholly from the right ventricle,
although the vessel communicates with both cavities, since at this
period the cavities are undivided. The furrow which marks the line of
the future septum ventriculorum runs to the left of the root of the
common trunk; and until at least as late as the sixth week this trunk
appears from the exterior to be in connection only with the future
right ventricle.
In seven cases the duration of life varied from four days to nine
months.
When the stenosis does not reach a high grade, positive clinical
signs are often wanting for the determination of its existence, and
the difficulty becomes greater as the age of the person advances.
In all cases the aorta arose from both ventricles. The right side of
heart was dilated, and the right ventricular wall hypertrophied. The
foramen ovale remained open. The ductus arteriosus Botalli has
been found absent or closed, and the collateral circulation effected
by anomalous communications, oftentimes duplicate or manifold; in
most cases the ductus remains open. The oldest patient in which
this form of heart has been found was twenty-five years.
The foramen ovale has been found open in 39 cases out of 53. Its
condition in this respect shows very great proportional variation in
the different collections of cases. The open or closed condition of the
foramen does not seem to depend on the degree of stenosis of the
pulmonary artery itself. It depends, probably, more on the freedom
of escape for the blood from both the ventricles through the aorta—
probably also on the condition of the ductus arteriosus Botalli. The
foramen ovale and ductus art. Bot. have been found closed much
more frequently in stenosis than in atresia of the pulmonary artery,
and the ductus is deficient or absent oftener in stenosis than in
atresia. This absence of the ductus occurs in 13 per cent. of the
cases, and tends to support Peacock's theory that narrowing of the
pulmonary artery is the consequence of the defective development
of that branchial arch out of which the ductus art. Botalli is formed.
Primary defects of the systemic side of the heart are, for the reasons
already given, very much more rarely seen than those of the
pulmonary heart. In such cases the aortic conus and its orifice are
found more frequently affected than the mitral orifice; both of these
orifices, however, may be congenitally altered without foetal
malformations at other parts of the heart being present; such cases
are on record, though only sparsely scattered through the literature
of cardiac diseases. Dilg8 has recently made an important addition to
this subject. He proposes a classification on a new basis for all forms
of cardiac malformation; to these classes he makes conform the
malformations of the left side of the heart. In the first class he
places all cases dependent on an inflammatory process occurring in
the foetal heart after its normal development is completed; in the
second, those cases of malformation in which the deviation from the
normal consists in defects of formation; in the third, those which
present a combination of endo-myocarditis with defective
development.
8 Virch. Arch., Bd. xci., S. 193–259, 1883: "Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss seltener
Herzanomalien in Anschluss an einem Fall von angeborner linksseitiger
Conusstenose."
In the second group there are eight cases in which the defective
condition of the aortic conus caused malformation of other parts of
the heart. Here the conus stenosis occurred at an early period of
foetal development, before the permanent structures of the heart
were fully formed. The conus stenosis is to be considered as
primary, the other defects as secondary. As we have already seen,
the left side of the heart is much less liable to deforming causes, and
when such do occur the secondary defects are less conspicuous.
Thus, in only four of these cases were there such malformations of
other parts of the heart as openings in the septa of the ventricles or
auricles, patency of the ductus arteriosus Botalli. The defects consist
more usually in what were formerly called excesses of development,
such as the formation of bands below the aortic orifice; or of
deficiencies of development, such as only two aortic valves. These
conditions are very doubtfully due to formative excesses or
deficiencies, but rather to intense inflammatory processes or other
morbid conditions which have resulted in the formation of excessive
cicatrices or the removal of normal parts.
If the child passes beyond the first weeks of life without exhibiting
cyanosis, the subsequent occurrence of the condition becomes
almost a pathognomonic symptom of cardiac or vascular
malformation, unless it can be shown that the coloration is
dependent on some acute disease, especially acquired valvular
disease: in this connection collapse of the lung (post-natal
atelectasis), too, must be remembered.
It is during the first week of life that cyanosis makes its appearance
in the great majority of cases of malformation of the heart, in the
proportion of more than two to one of the cases. The coloration,
once developed, may remain permanent and of equal intensity until
death, but as less than 8 per cent. of infants with malformation die
within the first week, and only 36 per cent. within the first year, this
symptom usually remits. It may wholly disappear, to return on very
slight provocation, such as excitement, or on exertion, on the advent
of acute disease, or without apparent cause. Probably about one-
fourth of those who die in infancy perish in paroxysms of dyspnoea,
another quarter of acute disease, and the remaining half of
convulsions; and toward death the cyanosis generally becomes very
intense.
Cyanosis.
Gintrac defended the admixture theory for cyanosis, and his views
became so well known that a large majority of persons conformed
their belief to his teachings. This author distinguished four varieties
of blue coloration: first, that due to some malformation of the heart
or great vessels, by which the blood of the right side of the heart
enters the systemic arterial circulation; second, likewise due to
intermixture of the blood, but produced by conditions developed
after birth through the re-establishment of the passages of
communication or other changes in the circulation; third, where the
coloration appears without direct admixture of the blood, but from
organic disease of the heart; fourth, cases without malformation,
from a suppression of the menses. Before the time of Gintrac,
cyanosis had a very indefinite signification, and the condition was
looked upon, and was classed by very many, as one of the
cachexiæ, and was often spoken of as a form of icterus. He,
however, held that the organic lesions of the heart and great vessels
were the necessary conditions of its production, and that the mixture
of the red and black blood, and the distribution of the mixed fluid by
means of the arteries to all parts of the body, determined its
essential character. He showed, too, that all communications
between the right and left heart were not followed by cyanosis; the
explanation of the absence of the blue color was that from the
simultaneous contraction of the auricles and ventricles of the two
sides of the heart an equilibrium was produced, and the blood did
not deviate from its normal course. This result followed only when
the normal exits of the blood were unobstructed. This supposition,
as is apparent, is not in accord with the facts. During the filling of
the ventricles, before the muscular contraction of the walls occurs,
the blood has the opportunity of freely mingling if the opening
between the cavities is sufficiently large: that the blood will not thus
mingle when the muscular contraction acts remains to be proved.
Cases of open septum ventriculorum, as an isolated defect, without
obstruction of the great vascular trunks (a rare condition), are not
attended with cyanosis: the absence of this symptom, as will be
shown later, is readily to be explained on other grounds than those
supposed by Gintrac. The normal outlets of the blood are, however,
almost always obstructed to a greater or less degree; and here the
explanation of the absence of the cyanosis fails. In the delayed
appearance of cyanosis Gintrac considered the reason to be that the
venous blood differed less from the arterial in the young subject
than in those of more advanced age, because, on the one hand, the
aëration was more active, and, on the other hand, the deterioration
of arterial blood was less marked. In other cases he points to an
increase of the obstruction, through inflammatory changes, as the
probable reason for the delayed appearance of the blue color; in still
other cases it was supposed to be due to a disturbance of the
equilibrium of the pulmonary and systemic circulation from an
increase in the blood-mass. In cases of unilocular and bilocular
hearts, of which the author speaks, his explanation completely fails,
for here the admixture of the blood within the heart is very marked;
yet such cases have been reported without cyanosis. He further
believed that openings in the ventricular septum, as well as between
the auricles, were effected after birth as the results of acquired
cardiac disease.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookultra.com