Reviewer
Reviewer
Numerous uprisings against foreign rule mark the history of the Philippines during
the Spanish colonial period. Various socio-economic grievances, cultural
oppression, and a burgeoning national identity fueled these early revolts.
One significant revolt was the Magalat Revolt in 1896, led by Juan Magalat. This
uprising occurred during a heightened revolutionary sentiment against Spanish
colonial rule. The primary causes included widespread discontent with oppressive
taxation and forced labor, as revolutionary ideas began to spread throughout the
archipelago. Although the revolt was quickly suppressed, it contributed to
Filipinos' growing fervor for independence.
Similarly, the Igorot Revolt represented the resistance of the Igorot tribes against
Spanish attempts to control their territories. Local leaders organized this revolt,
which stemmed from grievances related to the tribute system and the
infringement on their customs and land rights. Despite the eventual suppression
of this rebellion, it highlighted the determination of indigenous groups to resist
colonial oppression.
In the 18th century, the Gaddang Revolt emerged as local leaders in the Cagayan
Valley fought against the heavy demands for tribute and labor imposed by
Spanish authorities. This revolt, though ultimately quelled, served as a significant
assertion of identity among the Gaddang people and reflected the widespread
dissatisfaction with colonial rule.
The Sumuroy Revolt in 1649, led by Juan Sumuroy, took place in Samar as a
reaction to the imposition of the Polo y Servicio, which required local men to
work on government projects. This revolt gained initial support but was ultimately
suppressed by Spanish forces. It underscored the harsh realities of colonial
policies and the desire for autonomy among the local populace.
In Pampanga, the Maniago Revolt occurred in 1762 under the leadership of
Manuel Maniago. This uprising was fueled by resentment against the bandala
system, which forced farmers to sell their crops at low prices to the government.
Although the revolt was eventually suppressed, it demonstrated the potential for
organized resistance and highlighted the economic grievances faced by many
Filipinos under colonial rule.
The Hermano Pule revolt of the 1840s, led by Apolinario de la Cruz, was rooted
in religious discontent. De la Cruz, a religious leader, founded the Confradia de
San Jose, advocating for religious reform and local governance. His movement
aimed to address the Spanish clergy's control over Filipino religious practices. The
revolt, while ultimately crushed, raised awareness of the need for social and
religious reforms and influenced later movements.
Another notable uprising was the Diego Silang Revolt in 1762, which occurred
during the British occupation of Manila. Led by Diego Silang, this revolt took
advantage of the political turmoil and was motivated by economic hardship,
heavy taxation, and a desire for independence from Spanish rule. Silang's
movement inspired many and is remembered as a significant early nationalistic
effort against colonialism.
The Dagohoy Revolt, lasting from 1744 to 1829, stands out as the longest revolt
in Philippine history. Led by Francisco Dagohoy, this uprising in Bohol was
sparked by the refusal of a priest to provide a proper burial for Dagohoy’s
brother, illustrating broader issues of clerical abuse and local governance. The
revolt lasted for an impressive 85 years, showing the deep-rooted resistance to
Spanish authority and fostering a growing sense of nationalism among Filipinos.
During the Tapar Revolt, Tapar, a native of Panay, aimed to create a new religious
cult in Oton due to the misconduct of Spanish friars. He gained many followers
but was ultimately killed in a violent clash with the Spaniards, with his body and
those of his men displayed on stakes.
the Maharlika Conspiracy involved a group of local elites and nobles who aimed
to overthrow Spanish rule and reclaim political power for themselves. Driven by
political disenfranchisement and resentment towards colonial policies, this
conspiracy was uncovered before it could be executed, yet it highlighted the
aspirations of local elites for greater autonomy.
H istorical context:
•Date and place
•Who is the author? (not just name, but position and
nationality/ethnicity/gender)
•What events were going on at the time or right before this document was
written?
•Is the document a primary or secondary source?
I ntended Audience:
•For whom (specifically, generally) was the document intended?
•What details in this document help you identify the audience? How do you know
who it was written for?
P urpose:
•Why was this document created? What was its goal?
•What was the author trying to accomplish?
•What elements in the doc help you to determine its purpose?
P oint of View:
•Who (specifically, generally) wrote/produced the document?
•What details reflect the author’s POV? (Look at profession, race, gender, class,
location, etc)
•Ulterior (meaning “main”) or secondary motive or purpose? How is this
topic/subject personal or how does it apply to the author?
Laguna Copperplate
Discovered in the 1980s in Lumban, Laguna, this 9th-century copperplate
contains inscriptions deciphered by Antoon Postma. It documents the release
from debt of a chieftain and his family, featuring a mix of old Malay, Sanskrit,
Javanese, and Tagalog terms. This artifact represents one of the earliest written
records in the Philippines.
Motives of Colonization
The motives for colonization included the pursuit of economic gain through
resource extraction, the desire for political power and territorial expansion, the
aim of spreading Christianity, and strategic interests in establishing military bases.
Together, these factors shaped the complex legacy of colonialism