Antibiotic Awareness
Antibiotic Awareness
www.bioinformation.net
Research Article
Volume 20(3)
Received March 1, 2024; Revised March 31, 2024; Accepted March 31, 2024, Published March 31, 2024
DOI: 10.6026/973206300200282
BIOINFORMATION Impact Factor (2023 release) is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 across continents taken for IF calculations.
License statement:
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher
Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory
where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the
Biological/Biomedical domain.
author
282
ISSN 0973-2063 (online) 0973-8894 (print)
Author contacts:
Raid Abdullah Almnea – E-mail: [email protected]; Phone: +966-17541-7960
Siraj DAA Khan – E-mail: [email protected]
Ahmed Ali Alelyani – E-mail: [email protected]
Rizwan Qureshi – E-mail: [email protected]
Ziyad Mohammad Assiri – E-mail: [email protected]
Mansour Hamad Alkorbi – E-mail: [email protected]
Khaled Ahmed Almasabi – E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract:
The knowledge of Dentists and Endodontists in Saudi Arabia regarding antibiotic prescriptions during and after endodontic
treatment is of interest. A self-designed questionnaire survey was utilized to assess the knowledge of dentists across various cities in
Saudi Arabia concerning antibiotic usage guidelines for endodontic purposes. A total of 391 participants were included in the study,
and the questionnaire was distributed through social platforms like WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook Messenger, and email. Results
revealed that over 80% of participants acknowledged the need for antibiotics in cases of acute apical abscess with cellulitis, with
amoxicillin being the most recommended antibiotic by dentists. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant difference in
knowledge based on experience or graduation group. In conclusion, while participants demonstrated adequate knowledge about
antibiotic prescriptions in endodontic cases, continued awareness of updated guidelines, including the WHO's Essential Medicines
List (EML), guidelines by the European Society of Endodontology (ESE) and American Association Endodontists (AAE) is essential
for optimal clinical practice.
283
ISSN 0973-2063 (online) 0973-8894 (print)
awareness regarding adverse reactions, multi-resistant strains, other private information were deliberately omitted from the
and bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis. [12] However, there is no collected data.
data on Saudi dentists and endodontists regarding antibiotic
prescription practices. Evaluating this information is crucial to Statistical analysis:
identifying knowledge gaps, enabling the design of effective The data was analyzed using the SPSS software, and the results
educational campaigns, and addressing the issue of were portrayed using descriptive measures. Correlations among
indiscriminate antibiotic use. Therefore, it is of interest to gather various parameters were determined using χ² tests.
the knowledge of antibiotic prescription during endodontic
treatment among dentists in Saudi Arabia. Ethical approval:
Approval for the ethical considerations of this study was granted
Materials and Methods: by the Deanship of Research, Najran University under the
Study design: reference number 202401-076-017905-040323.
This cross-sectional survey, employing a questionnaire-based
approach, took place from August to December 2023. The survey Results:
aimed to assess the understanding of antibiotic prescriptions for This study encompassed a total of 391 participants, consisting of 55
endodontic cases among dentists and endodontics specialists. females (14.1%) and 336 males (85.9%) who were practicing dentistry.
The majority of participants were distributed across Najran (94), Abha
The questionnaire underwent initial scrutiny in a pilot study,
(68), Jeddah (58), and Riyadh (43). Regarding age distribution, 63.4% fell
with subsequent adjustments made to enhance its validity and within the less than 30 years category, while 36.6% were aged over 30. In
reliability. The questionnaire was prepared based on Antibiotic terms of professional experience, 35% had less than 3 years, 32.5% had 3-
prescription in Endodontic cases according to the ESE 2018 5 years, and more than 5 years of experience. The graduation years 2016-
guidelines. Comprising two segments, Part A encompassed 2020 comprised the majority, accounting for 63.9% of the participants
demographic details such as age, gender, work experience, and (Table 3). The majority of participants across various experience groups,
year of graduation, while Part B focused on queries related to including 123 (89.8%) with less than 3 years of experience, 102 (80.3%)
antibiotic prescription knowledge. These questions were with 3-5 years, and 105 (31.8%) with over 5 years, there was a consensus
that systemic antibiotics were necessary for patients diagnosed with
presented in various formats, including multiple-choice
acute apical abscess with cellulitis in endodontic cases. The preferred
questions, and open-ended questions. The survey delved into first-line antibiotics were Amoxicillin and Metronidazole, with 47.4%,
practitioners' comprehension of the indications for prescribing 53.5%, and 38.4% agreement from those with less than 3 years, 3-5 years,
antibiotics concerning systemic clinical signs associated with and more than 5 years of experience, respectively. This choice was
endodontic cases. Participants were queried about the necessity particularly favoured for patients in good health without documented
of antibiotics for specific clinical conditions, including acute allergies. Only 3 (2.2%) participants with less than 3 years of experience
pulpitis, acute apical abscess, chronic apical abscess with sinus opted for clindamycin in such cases. In instances where patients were
tract, and chronic apical periodontitis, and their preferred allergic to penicillin or amoxicillin, the majority across all experience
groups recommended Clindamycin, comprising 118 (86.1%) with less
treatment choices. Additionally, the survey explored various
than 3 years of experience, 110 (86.6%) with 3-5 years, and 110 (86.6%)
factors influencing antibiotic prescriptions. with more than 5 years of experience. Ciprofloxacin and a combination
of clindamycin and ciprofloxacin were the least preferred antibiotics. For
Sample size: patients with a localized swelling and draining sinus, the majority across
In total, 500 dentists were enlisted for this investigation, and a experience groups (56.2%, 55.9%, and 66.9% for less than 3 years, 3-5
questionnaire was distributed to them. Out of the total, 410 years, and more than 5 years of experience, respectively) recommended a
participants actively responded and submitted their completed combination of antibiotics (Table 2). The recommended dosage which
questionnaires. To maintain data quality, questionnaires with is chose by 50% participants was Penicillin VKa loading dose 1000
mg with a maintenance dose of 500 mg q4-6h 5-7 days followed by
less than 30% of questions answered were excluded, resulting in
Amoxicillin loading dose 1000 mg with a maintenance dose of 500
391 questionnaires being available for subsequent analysis. mg q4-6h 5-7 days by 32% participants (Figure 1). A total of 36%
participants were agreed that Patients with previous history of
Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Infective Endocarditis need antibiotic prescription while only 5%
The inclusion criteria for this study involved general dentists agree that Patients with primary Endodontic lesions with secondary
and endo-dontists practicing in Saudi Arabia. Exclusions periodontal involvement need prescription of antibiotics (Figure 2). A
comprised practitioners who declined participation and those large number of dentists across different graduation groups, including
not involved in performing endodontic procedures. Participation 57 (83.8%) from the 1st group (before 2015), 209 (83.6%) from the 2nd
group (2016-2020), and 64 (87.7%) from the 3rd group (after 2020), there
was entirely voluntary, with participants retaining the right to
was consensus that systemic antibiotics were necessary for patients
withdraw from the study at any point without facing any diagnosed with acute apical abscess with cellulitis in endodontic cases.
consequences. The questionnaire's outset included a cover letter Notably, 10.3% of participants from the 1st group opted for irreversible
elucidating the survey's purpose and guaranteeing data pulpitis, and 9.6% from the 3rd group chose symptomatic apical
confidentiality. Respondents signalled their consent to periodontitis instead. Amoxicillin and Metronidazole were considered
participate and were subsequently directed to complete the the primary antibiotics by most participants (55.9%, 58.8%, and 42.5%
questionnaire. Personal identifiers such as names, emails, or any from the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd groups, respectively) for prescribing in
endodontic cases requiring antibiotic treatment, particularly for patients
in good health without documented allergies. Amoxicillin and
284
ISSN 0973-2063 (online) 0973-8894 (print)
Clavulanic acid emerged as the second most preferred antibiotics for suggested that their members forward this information to
these patients. For individuals allergic to penicillin or amoxicillin, dentists in their respective countries. [8] In the investigation
Clindamycin was the top-recommended antibiotic by the majority of conducted by Abdulhai et al. a significant majority of
participants across all groups (58 (85.3%), 218 (87.2%), and 62 (85.0%)
participants (75.3%) selected amoxicillin 500 mg, three times a
from the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd groups, respectively). In cases involving
localized swelling with a draining sinus, a combination of antibiotics was day, as their primary choice for therapeutic antibiotics. [19]
recommended by most participants (67.6%, 59.2%, and 53.4% from each Similarly, in our study, Amoxicillin and Metronidazole were the
group, respectively) (Table 3). The recommended dosage and regimen first choice by 216 (55.2%) dentists. This percentage stands
for patients requiring prophylactic antibiotics in the context of notably higher than what was reported in a prior local study
endodontic treatment in an adult according to the 56% participants was (18.3% and 33.7%) and various international studies (34-47%).
Amoxicillin, oral route, 1 g , 1 hour before procedure (Figure 3). For the [13, 21, 22] However, it is lower than the reported preferences of
patients who have allergy to amoxicillin in endodontic cases, the Brazilian endodontists (90.2%) and Spanish dental students
recommended dosage according to 63% participants was Clindamycin,
(100%). [23] According to ESE antibiotics guidelines in
oral route, 600 mg ,1 h before procedure (Figure 4).
endodontics, Beta-lactam antibiotics (penicillin V and
amoxicillin) are recommended for the treatment of endodontic
Discussion:
infections. Recommended loading doses are 1000 mg of
This cross-sectional study, conducted through a questionnaire,
penicillin V administered orally followed by 500 mg every 4–6 h
aimed to evaluate the knowledge of antibiotic prescription
or 1000 mg of amoxicillin, with or without clavulanic acid,
practices among dentists and endodontists in Saudi Arabia
followed by 500 mg every 8 h. [8, 24] Penicillin VK, being
during endodontic treatments. The findings revealed sufficient
bactericidal, exhibits high effectiveness, low toxicity, and cost-
knowledge among participants regarding the prescription of
effectiveness. [25] Notably, penicillin has a relatively narrow
antibiotics in endodontic therapy. It is worth noting that the
spectrum, while amoxicillin boasts a broader spectrum of
present survey boasted a larger sample size (n=319) compared to
antibiotic activity. [24, 25]
a 2015 local study by Iqbal (n=157), demonstrating a notable
strength. [13] Furthermore, the current study included
Table 1: Demographic Details of Participants
participants from various cities and institutes in Saudi Arabia, Gender
distinguishing it from the single-institute study conducted by Female 55 14.1
Iqbal et al. in 2015, which adds another layer of strength. [13] Male 336 85.9
Total 391 100.0
According to the British Society for Antimicrobial
Area of Practice
Chemotherapy, improper prescription of antibacterial drugs by Abha 68 17.4
dental practitioners significantly contributes to the emergence of Al Madina 33 8.4
drug-resistant strains. Factors such as inappropriate dosing, Al-Ahsa 2 0.5
Aljouf 3 0.8
duration, and prophylaxis play a role in the development of Bisha 3 0.8
resistant strains. [14] Various factors, including the improper Buraidah 2 0.5
prescription of antibiotics by medical or dental practitioners, Dammam 7 1.8
Hail 5 1.3
contribute to Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). [8] Once
Jazan 23 5.9
resistance occurs, reversing it becomes impossible, emphasizing Jeddah 58 14.8
the importance of minimizing the development of new resistant Khamis Mushait 5 1.3
strains through the judicious use of antibiotics. [15] As per a Khobar 4 1.0
Makkah 18 4.6
systematic review conducted by James et al. antibiotics were Najran 94 24.0
deemed non-essential for providing relief in cases of irreversible Riyadh 43 11.0
pulpitis. [16,17] Consistent with this, the research conducted by Sharurah 11 2.8
Tabuk 7 1.8
Vengidesh et al. identified a certain degree of antibiotic misuse,
Taif 5 1.3
with prescriptions given for pain relief, reversible pulpitis, Total 391 100.0
irreversible pulpitis, and endodontic flare-ups (84.1%). [18] In Age
the current study, 330 (84.4%) dentists agreed that the Less than 30 years 248 63.4
More than 30 years 143 36.6
prescription of antibiotics was deemed necessary in the Total 391 100.0
condition of acute apical abscess with Cellulitis. Similarly, Experience
another study indicated that the highest percentage of antibiotic Less than 3 years 137 35.0
3 to 5 years 127 32.5
prescriptions was observed in cases of acute apical abscess with
More than 5 years 127 32.5
diffuse intraoral swelling, accompanied by fever and trismus Total 391 100.0
(83.4%), as well as in cases of acute apical abscess with diffuse Graduation Group
intra- and extra-oral swelling, fever, and trismus (81%). [19] Before 2015 68 17.4
2016-2020 250 63.9
These percentages align with the findings of a Brazilian survey, After 2020 73 18.7
reporting figures of 88.1% and 90.1%, respectively. [20] To Total 391 100.0
prevent antibiotic overuse, in 2018, the European Society of
Endodontology (ESE) issued the most recent recommendations
for prescribing practices related to endodontic infections and
285
ISSN 0973-2063 (online) 0973-8894 (print)
286
ISSN 0973-2063 (online) 0973-8894 (print)
Which antibiotic is the optimal choice when a patient Ciprofloxacin 1 7 1 9 8.081 0.779
exhibits an allergy 1.5% 2.8% 1.4% 2.3%
to penicillin or amoxicillin in the context of Clarithromycin 2 11 3 16
endodontic treatment? 2.9% 4.4% 4.1% 4.1%
Clindamycin 58 218 62 338
85.3% 87.2% 85.0% 86.5%
Clindamycin, Ciprofloxacin 2 5 2 9
2.9% 2.0% 2.7% 2.3%
Minocycline 3 5 3 11
4.4% 2.0% 4.1% 2.8%
Minocycline, Clindamycin 2 4 2 8
0.5% 1.6% 2.7% 2.0%
Under what circumstances should a combination of Patients having a localised swelling with draining sinus 46 148 39 233 6.709 0.349
antibiotics, such as 67.6% 59.2% 53.4% 59.6%
Amoxicillin and metronidazole, be considered in Patients showing no improvement in symptoms with previous medication of 16 68 20 104
endodontic treatment? Amoxicillin alone 23.5% 27.2% 27.4% 26.6%
Patients with allergy to Penicillin VK 2 17 4 23
2.9% 6.8% 5.5% 5.9%
Patients with sharp and shooting pain and tooth tender on percussion 4 17 10 31
5.9% 6.8% 13.7% 7.9%
In which clinical scenario antibiotic prescription is a Acute Apical Abscess with localised fluctuant swellings, elevated body temperature 58 200 43 301 24.359 0.000
consideration for >38°C, malaise, lymphadenopathy, trismu 85.3% 80.0% 58.9% 77.0%
Preventing post-treatment flare-ups / Post treatment Irreversible Pulpitis with Condensing Osteitis 5 20 10 35
pain in endodontic cases? 7.4% 8.0% 13.7% 9.0%
Necrotic pulp with Periapical Radiolucency 5 20 18 43
7.4% 8.0% 24.7% 11.0%
Patients with tooth fractures, concussion, subluxation, luxation injuries and extrusion 0 10 2 12
injury 0.0% 4.0% 2.7% 3.1%
Is antibiotic prescription advisable in cases where a No , not indicated in healthy patients 37 137 34 208 3.678 0.451
radiograph reveals a 54.4% 54.8% 46.6% 53.2%
Substantial periapical radiolucency associated with a Yes , in retreatment cases to prevent post operative pain 1 13 5 19
draining sinus/ 1.5% 5.2% 6.8% 4.9%
purulent discharge in endodontic patients? Yes, for better treatment outcomes 30 100 34 164
44.1% 40.0% 46.6% 41.9%
Should antibiotics be prescribed for patients who No , not indicated in healthy patients 39 156 47 242 0.869 0.929
present with severe pain 57.4% 64.5% 64.4% 61.9%
in response to hot and cold stimuli, along with Yes , in retreatment cases to prevent post operative painYes , in retreatment cases to 13 41 12 66
clinical signs of percussion prevent post operative pain 19.1% 16.4% 16.4% 16.9%
Tenderness, to expedite symptom relief in endodontic Yes, for better treatment outcomes 16 53 14 83
cases? 23.5% 21.2% 19.2% 21.2%
287
ISSN 0973-2063 (online) 0973-8894 (print)
Figure 1: Recommended dosage and prescription for penicillin VKa /Amoxicillin in endodontic cases
Figure 2: In what clinical scenario is the prophylactic prescription of antibiotics deemed necessary in endodontics?
288
ISSN 0973-2063 (online) 0973-8894 (print)
Figure 3: Recommended dosage and regimen for patients requiring prophylactic antibiotics in the context of endodontic treatment in
an adult.
Figure 4: What is the recommended dosage and regimen for patients requiring prophylactic antibiotics who have and allergy to
amoxicillin in endodontic cases?
289
ISSN 0973-2063 (online) 0973-8894 (print)
290
ISSN 0973-2063 (online) 0973-8894 (print)
[21] Deniz-Sungur D et al. Int Endod J. 2020 53:1715. [29] Ismail F et al. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2018 38:79.
[PMID: 32805741] [30] Yousufi S et al. Int J Dent Oral Health. 2019 5:68.
[22] Epstein JB et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 131:1600 [31] Baumgartner JC et al. J Endod. 2003 29:44
[PMID: 11103580]. [PMID: 12540219].
[23] Martin-Jimenez M et al. Int Endod J. 2018 51:118 [32] Rodriguez-Nunez A et al. J Endod. 2009 35:1198
[PMID: 28375572]. [PMID: 19720216].
[24] Segura-Egea JJ et al. Int Endod J. 2017 50:1169 [33] Segura-Egea JJ et al. Int Endod J. 2010 43:342
[PMID: 28005295]. [PMID: 20487455].
[25] Ahmadi H et al. Int J Dent. 2021 2021:6667624 [PMID: [34] AlRahabi MK et al. Saudi Med J. 2017 38:852
33574843]. [PMID: 28762439].
[26] Slots J. J Periodontal Res. 2002 37:389 [PMID: 12366863]. [35] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28844223/
[27] Maslamani M et al. Med Princ Pract. 2018 27:66 [36] Aminoshariae A et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 147:186
[PMID: 29262417]. [PMID: 26724957].
[28] Hyder M et al. PJMHS. 2021 15:2901.
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2115112901
291