zhang2016
zhang2016
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Hemarthria R. Br. is a genus which includes important forage grasses. However, there is
Received 25 April 2016 currently a lack of data analysis on the chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) of Hemarthria species.
Received in revised form 27 July 2016 This study is to use three cpDNA intergenic spacers (trnL-F, trnC-ycf6 and psbC-trnS) to
Accepted 30 July 2016
obtain phylogenetic information in 36 Hemarthria samples including four Hemarthria
species: Hemarthria altissima (Poir.) Stapf et C. E. Hubb., Hemarthria compressa (L. f.) R. Br.,
Hemarthria uncinata R. Br., and Hemarthria japonica (Hack.) Roshev. Data analysis revealed
Keywords:
that non-significant genetic diversity existed in our samples, which was implied by
Chloroplast DNA
Hemarthria altissima (Poir.) Stapf et C. E.
nucleotide sequences information and the results of haplotypic and nucleotide diversity.
Hubb. The results of phylogenetic trees based on maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian infer-
Hemarthria compressa (L. f.) R. Br. ence (BI) revealed that H. altissima and H. compressa samples were not entirely distinct,
Genetic diversity suggesting that the two species share an intimate genetic relationship. A haplotype
Genetic structure median-joining (MJ) network revealed broadly similar results to those derived from the ML
trnL-F and BI trees and implied that haplotype H3 may represent an ancient haplotype. Analysis
trnC-ycf6 of the population statistic FST revealed little genetic differentiation among the seven
psbC-trnS
populations of H. altissima in Africa.
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The genus Hemarthria R. Br. in the Poaceae family consists of about 20 species that are geographically widely distributed.
Among these species, the two that are the most important agriculturally and widely studied are Hemarthria altissima (Poir.)
* Corresponding author.
** Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (J. Zhang), [email protected] (L.-k. Huang).
1
These authors contributed equally to this work.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2016.07.024
0305-1978/© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
92 J. Zhang et al. / Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 69 (2016) 91e100
Stapf et C. E. Hubb. and Hemarthria compressa (L. f.) R. Br. H. altissima, also known as limpograss, is a warm-season perennial
grass that is native to Africa (Yang et al., 2004; Newman et al., 2011). After being introduced to Florida, limpograss has been
widely used by beef cattle producers as a summer forage plant in the southeastern part of the United States due to its high
forage yield, high quality, and high tolerance of poorly drained soils (Newman et al., 2011). H. compressa (whipgrass), a relative
of limpograss, is another particularly important species of Hemarthria and is mainly found in China. These two species have
been extensively used and commercially grown in subtropical and tropical areas, and made important contributions to agro-
animal husbandry ecosystem development and maintenance (Yang et al., 2004).
Despite their economic and ecological importance, there is a serious lack of genomic information available for H. altissima
and H. compressa. Before the 21th century, studies on H. altissima and H. compressa were mainly focused on naturally
occurring germplasm morphology (Schank et al., 1973), cytology (Quesenberry et al., 1982), stress resistance (Hudson, 1986),
and breeding (Yang et al., 2004). In recent years, molecular studies, including the estimation of genetic diversity, construction
of DNA fingerprints, and association of molecular markers with agronomically important traits, have been conducted on H.
altissima and H. compressa using a variety of molecular markers. However, all of these markers have so far been based on
nuclear DNA (Huang et al., 2008, 2014, 2014a; uang et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2014a, 2014b; Chen et al., 2011). To date, there
have been no molecular research studies based on analysis of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) in Hemarthria.
Outside of the cell nucleus, the cpDNA of higher plants represents an additional source of genetic information. The
chloroplast genomes of most angiosperms exhibit a simple, circular structure with a low substitution rates and high con-
servation, and they are inherited in a non-Mendelian, uniparental fashion (Clegg et al., 1994). Currently, cpDNA sequence data
is widely used to study the origin, evolution, and genetic diversity of natural populations of the majority of important plant
species (Juszczak et al., 2012). Although cpDNA is conserved in plants, non-coding and coding regions differ greatly in the
evolution rate (Yan et al., 2015). The non-coding regions are more hypervariable and are richer in variations such as sub-
stitutions, translocations, inversions, insertions, and deletions (Katayama et al., 2012). These represent ideal segments for
interspecific phylogenetic studies at low taxonomic levels, such as hybrid cultivar identification, reconstruction of genetic
relationships of plants species, and intraspecific phylogeographic studies (Bakker et al., 1999; Kimura et al., 2003).
Previous molecular research on Hemarthria based on DNAmarkers revealed distinctive genetic differences and extensive
genetic diversity in wild plant resources. These studies also suggested a close genetic relationship between H. altissima and H.
compressa. However, in-depth analysis of the relationship between these two significant Hemarthria species is lacking.
Therefore, in this study, we sought to take advantage of the virtues of cpDNA non-coding regions by assessing three cpDNA
intergenic spacers (trnL-F, trnC-ycf6, and psbC-trnS) in 36 Hemarthria germplasm resources (including 26 H. altissima, 8 H.
compressa, 1 Hemarthria uncinata R. Br., and 1 Hemarthria japonica (Hack.) Roshev.). Our aims were mainly to (1) estimate the
genetic diversity of the 36 Hemarthria samples based on cpDNA sequence variation, (2) explore phylogenetic relationships
between H. altissima and H. compressa, and (3) reveal the genetic structure of African H. altissima. Our results serve to enrich
the existing knowledge on the genetic diversity of H. altissima and H. compressa, providing useful information for the
development of conservation strategies for Hemarthria and for future phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies of
Hemarthria species.
In this study, 26 H. altissima samples, one H. compressa, and one H. uncinata included, were collected from the USDA
Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) program in October 2012 (Huang et al., 2014). Another seven H. compressa
samples and one H. japonica sample were obtained from the Sichuan Agricultural University (Yaan), Sichuan, China. Detailed
information on these 36 Hemarthria samples is summarized in Table 1. Unfortunately, records of two samples were ambig-
uous. One sample was described as deriving from ‘South Africa’, which could refer to either the Limpopo or KwaZulu-Nata
region. Another source was recorded as simply ‘Japan’, which may refer to the city of Yokohama. All plant samples were
maintained as rhizomes. Fresh and young leaf tissues from each sampled individual clone were harvested and dried at room
temperature in collection bags with color silica gel.
Dry and young leaf tissues were first ground by a Tissue Lyser (Grinder, Beijing, China) and were later used to be extracted
genomic DNA using a Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) in accordance with the manufacturer's directions. DNA
quality was analyzed by 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis, and DNA concentration was quantified by NanoDrop 2000
spectrophotometer (Thermo, USA). The DNA stock was diluted to a working concentration of 20 ng/mL and stored at 20 C.
A set of universal cpDNA primers were used to amplify the target regions of trnL-F (50 -CGAAATCGGTAGACGCTACG-30 , 50 -
ATTTGAACTGGTGACACGAG-30 ), trnC-ycf6 (50 -CCAGTTCAAATCTGGGTGTC-30 ,50 -CATTAAAGCAGCCCAAGC-30 ) (Demesure et al.,
1995) and psbC-trnS (50 -GGTCGTGACCAAGAAACCAC-30 , 50 -GGTTCGAATCCCTCTCTCTC-30 ) (Murakami et al., 2006). PCR was
J. Zhang et al. / Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 69 (2016) 91e100 93
Table 1
Sources of the 36 Hemarthria samples.
carried out in a total volume of 50 mL, containing 6 mL DNA template (20 ng/mL), 2 mL each forward and reverse primers
(10 pmol/mL), 25 mL Premix Taq (TakaRa Taq Version 2.0 plus dye; TakaRa Bio Inc., China), and 15 mL distilled water. PCR cycling
conditions observed the following settings: 5 min pre-denaturation at 94 C; 35 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 94 C, 1 min
annealing at 62e65 C, and 1 min extension at 72 C; and a final 10 min extension at 72 C. PCR products were detected on
1.5% agarose gels at 130 V for 30 min and visualized under UV light. Appropriately sized PCR products were then purified by
gel extraction and sent to the Beijing Genomics Institute for bi-directional gene sequencing.
Obtained sequences of the 25 African H. altissima samples or all samples pertaining to the three cpDNA intergenic spacers
were respectively spliced using DNASTAR SeqMan and then manually adjusted (Swindell and Plasterer, 1997). The multiple
splice sites of each cpDNA intergenic spacer sequence were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm in MEGA 5.0 and improved
by visual inspection (Yan et al., 2015). A BLASTN search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) was then performed using default
settings in order to identify homologous sequences in other plants. To assess levels of genetic variation, we estimated the
number of haplotypes (h), haplotype diversity (Hd), and nucleotide diversity (p) of each cpDNA intergenic spacer in the 36
Hemarthria samples using DnaSP 5.1 software (Librado and Rozas, 2009).
To determine whether the aligned sequences of each cpDNA intergenic spacer evolved neutrally in the 25 African H.
altissima, we performed neutrality tests, calculating Tajima's D, Fu and Li's F*, and Fu and Li's D* using DnaSP 5.1 following the
method published by Batnini et al. (2014). Next, mismatch distribution was assessed to identify historical processes such as
population equilibrium and recent demographic expansion, which are characterized by a multimodal distribution and
unimodal distribution, respectively (Hu et al., 2011). These were implemented in DnaSP 5.1 and Arlequin 3.1, respectively
(D'Aloia et al., 2015). These two programs were used to draw plots of mismatch distribution based on different theories.
Since a single cpDNA intergenic spacer sequence does not provide sufficient phylogenetic information, we decided to
combine the three cpDNA sequence data sets using SequenceMatrix 1.7 software for subsequent phylogenetic analysis
(Vaidya et al., 2011). Before doing this, we investigated whether the three cpDNA sequence data sets were appropriate for
pooling based on congruence between sequence datasets (Dolphin et al., 2000). The incongruence length difference (ILD) test
94 J. Zhang et al. / Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 69 (2016) 91e100
was implemented by PAUP 4.0 (Swofford, 1998). The likelihood heterogeneity values in this study were not significant at
P ¼ 0.10, indicating no conflicting phylogenetic signals among the three cpDNA intergenic spacers. Hence, we combined the
data from the trnL-F, trnC-ycf6, and psbC-trnS regions.
Combined data were then tested for substitutional saturation in order to detect whether the sequence data were suited for
phylogenetic reconstruction. We applied Xia's test by calculating the saturation parameters Iss and Iss.c using DAMBE 4.5 (Xia
and Lemey, 2009). In order to provide a more intuitive assessment, substitution saturation was also investigated by plotting
the observed divergence against the corrected pairwise divergence calculated by applying the evolutionary model (GTR)
using DAMBE 4.5 (Xia and Lemey, 2009).
Phylogenetic analyses on the combined data of all materials were performed according to the Maximum likelihood (ML)
approach using PhyML 3.1 (Guindon et al., 2009) and the Bayesian inference (BI) approach with MrBayes 3.2 (Huelsenbeck
and Ronquist, 2001). The best-fitting nucleotide substitution models of sequence evolution with the lowest Akaike infor-
mation criterion (AIC) scores were determined by jModelTest 2.1 (Posada, 2008). Clade credibility of the ML phylogram was
assessed with 100 bootstrap replicates. For BI analysis, default priors were applied to each analysis using four Markov chain
Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains that were run for 2,000,000 generations with sampling frequency assigned at every 100 trees.
Node support was evaluated with posterior probabilities of the tree topology, and parameter values were summarized from
20,000 trees (burn-in of 5000 trees).
To evaluate which ML and BI tree topologies were optimal, several testing procedures were performed, including observed
log-likelihood difference (Obs), approximately unbiased (AU), bootstrap probability (BP), approximate Bayesian posterior
probability (PP), Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) test, Kishino-Hasegawa (KH) test, weighted Kishino-Hasegawa (WKH), and
weighted Shimodaira-Hasegawa (WSH) test using CONSEL 0.20 with default settings (Shimodaira and Hasegawa, 2001).
CONSEL calculated p-values from the output (the site-wise log-likelihoods for the trees) of the software package TREE-PUZZLE
(Schmidt et al., 2002).
To infer relationships among haplotypes of the 36 Hemarthria samples, the phylogenetic median-joining (MJ) network
algorithm based on parsimony criteria was performed by Network 4.6 software (Forster et al., 2004). The contribution to
genetic variation and parameter of genetic differentiation (FST) of populations of the 25 African H. altissima samples based on
chloroplast sequences were computed in Arlequin 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010).
3. Results
Table 2
Chloroplast DNA sequence polymorphisms in the 36 Hemarthria samples.
Note: NS ¼ number of sites; IS ¼ invariable sites; VS ¼ variable sites (no insertions/deletions); PIS ¼ parsimony informative sites; GCc ¼ GC content;
h ¼ number of haplotypes; Hd ¼ haplotype diversity; p ¼ nucleotide diversity.
J. Zhang et al. / Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 69 (2016) 91e100 95
diversity (0.579) and nucleotide diversity (0.00151). The incomplete psbC-trnS sequence exhibited the lowest rate pf poly-
morphism (1.30%) with the fewest haplotypes (7), the lowest haplotype diversity (0.354), and the lowest nucleotide diversity
(0.00092). All haplotype sequences had been submitted to NCBI's GenBank, the accession numbers were from KX599423 to
KX599454 (Supplementary Table 1).
According to the ILD test, no conflicting phylogenetic signal was discovered among the three cpDNA intergenic spacers, so
we combined the three sequence datasets for follow-up analyses. The total sequence length of the aligned, combined data was
2204 bp, including 2166 invariable sites and 38 variable sites. Among these variable sites, we explore nine parsimony-
informative sites, including eight sites with two variants and one site with five variants. The overall GC content was 0.362,
and a total of 21 haplotypes were presented. The average values of haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (p) were
0.851 and 0.00129, respectively (Table 2).
Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on the combined sequences of three cpDNA intergenic spacers (trnL-F, trnC-ycf6, and psbC-trnS) in 36 Hemarthria
samples. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values, which were computed based upon 100 replicates. A: Africa; Au: Australia; SA: South Africa; EA: East
Africa; C: China; SAM: South America; J: Japan.
(Supplementary Table 3). Statistical neutrality tests (Tajima's D, Fu and Li's F*, and Fu and Li's D*) of trnC-ycf6 and the
combined sequence data yielded highly significant (P < 0.05) negative values, but only the observed mismatch distribution of
the combined sequence data was unimodal (Supplementary Fig. 2), closely fitting the expected distribution under a model of
sudden expansion. For trnL-F and psbC-trnS, no distinct signal of population equilibrium or expansion was observed, as the
neutrality tests were not significant and the mismatch distribution did not reflect multimodal or unimodal distributions
(Supplementary Table 3, Supplementary Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed from the combined data sequences of three cpDNA intergenic spacers (trnL-F, trnC-ycf6, and psbC-trnS) in 36 Hemarthria
samples using Bayesian inference (BI). Numbers above branches are Bayesian posterior probability values. A: Africa; Au: Australia; SA: South Africa; EA: East
Africa; C: China; SAM: South America; J: Japan.
disperse, which could lead to high gene flow between populations, generating genetic relatedness between samples with
further geographic distant.
4. Discussion
This is the first report analyzing the genetic diversity of Hemarthria species using cpDNA molecular markers. Although
cpDNA non-coding regions are generally hypervariable and rich in variation, the 36 Hemarthria samples exhibited relatively
low genetic diversity of the cpDNA intergenic spacers trnL-F, trnC-ycf6, and psbC-trnS (Hd ¼ 0.575, 0.522, and 0.354,
respectively; p ¼ 0.00151, 0.00131, and 0.00092, respectively). The combined sequence data also exhibited low haplotype
diversity (Hd ¼ 0.851) and nucleotide diversity (p ¼ 0.129). This low level of genetic diversity resulted in low efficiency of the
cpDNA markers for resolving Hemarthria genotypes or, in other words, poor detection of variable sites (the highest proportion
of variable sites was only 2.0%). The proportion of variable sites is a major index that reflects the level of genetic diversity.
Similar findings were reported previously for trnC-ycf6 (proportion of variable sites ¼ 0.23%) in Anemoclema glaucifolium
(Guan et al., 2013) and for psbC-trnS (0.13%) in pear germplasm resources (Chang et al., 2014) but stood in contrast to results
98 J. Zhang et al. / Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 69 (2016) 91e100
Fig. 3. Median-joining haplotype network based on the combined sequences of three cpDNA intergenic spacers (trnL-F, trnC-ycf6, and psbC-trnS) in 36 Hemarthria
samples. H and mv denote haplotype and median vector, respectively.
Table 3
Molecular variance and FST in populations of H. altissima based on combined sequence data.
Source of population Source of variation d.f. Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation FST
All population Among populations 7 12.357 0.04994 2.98% FST ¼ 0.02980
Within populations 17 27.643 1.62605 97.02% (P ¼ 0.34311)
Total 24 40 1.67599
for trnL-F (44%) in field vittarioid gametophytes (Chen et al., 2013). Moreover, such low genetic diversity in our cpDNA analysis
contradicts previous studies based on nuclear DNA molecular markers (SCoT and EST-SSR markers) with higher levels of
genetic diversity in Hemarthria samples (Huang et al., 2014). A similar situation e low diversity in cpDNA and higher diversity
in nuclear markers e was also found in the Miscanthus sinensis (Yan et al., 2015). Lower genetic diversity in cpDNA non-coding
spacers compared to nuclear genes may be due to the influences of random genetic drift and genetic bottlenecks (Gong et al.,
2011).
Two methods of phylogenetic inference (ML and BI) were applied to group samples to elucidate relationships between
samples. Although the ML and BI trees displayed similar patterns, the hierarchical classification structures were not directly
associated with either the species labels or the geographic distributions of the samples. These results largely conflict with
results from nuclear EST-SSR and SCoT markers (Huang et al., 2014). Samples of the two species H. altissima and H. compressa
could not be clearly distinguished, indicating that they are closely related. This could be explained by the fact that the selected
markers did not cover the entire chloroplast genome, or it could reflect the strong conservation of the trnL-F, trnC-ycf6, and
psbC-trnS regions across plant species. The phylogenetic inferences were found to be consistent with a median-joining
network analysis, which showed that 10 H. altissima samples and 4 H. compressa samples were included together in
Haplotype 3. In addition, the results of the ML and BI analyses showed that some Hemarthria samples that were genetically
divergent were geographically close in proximity, which agrees with the mismatch distribution analysis of the combined data,
the population genetic structure analysis, and previous studies using cpDNA sequences (Batnini et al., 2014). This could be
explained by 1) the strong capacity of Hemarthria individuals to undergo asexual propagation and ecological adaptation,
which may be susceptible to natural factors (e.g., river flow), livestock activity (e.g., foraging), and human activities (e.g.,
domestication and cultivation) resulting in widespread dispersal of Hemarthria clones (Yang et al., 2004); 2) the likely
occurrence of natural hybridization between Hemarthria clones, resulting in the production of new genetic combinations that
may increase the complexity of the genetic and geographic distribution (Wu and Du, 2000); and 3) the probable occurrence of
gene mutations during plant growth.
J. Zhang et al. / Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 69 (2016) 91e100 99
There is a common belief that branch-support values from each partition of a tree can be interpreted as the probability that
the tree is correct or as an indicator of phylogenetic accuracy (Huelsenbeck et al., 2002). However, some believe that this is
misleading and branch-support values should not be interpreted as probabilities that clades are correctly resolved, as the
validity of ML or BI methods depend on the validity of the likelihood model and subsets of data (Simmons et al., 2004).
Although the bootstrap support values of the ML tree and the Bayesian posterior probability values of the BI tree were quite
weak for most of the clades in this study, we used normative processes to simulate the phylogenetic trees. Our low branch-
support values may be due to the restricted genetic background of the tested samples, as branch-support values are poor
when taxon sampling increases without an increase in genetic diversity (Simmons et al., 2004).
The ML and BI methods have been shown to be accurate in numerous simulation studies (Gill and Fast, 2006) and are now
broadly recognized as better approaches than the neighbor-joining (NJ) or maximum parsimony (MP) methods (Guindon
et al., 2010). In the case that an explicit evolutionary model was fitted for ML or BI, Huang (2012) held the ML method
was more consistent with evolutionary fact. By testing a variety of conditions, Hall (2005) reported that the BI method was the
more accurate. Negrisolo et al. (2004) believed that the ML method was very flexible due to its plasticity, and was theoretically
sound and statistically consistent. For this study, we employed the CONSEL program, which calculates probability values (i.e.,
p-values), to assess the tree topologies of the ML and BI trees in order to reveal which method was better suited to our data.
The results demonstrated that the ML tree exhibited a better topological structure, which may indicate that the ML method is
better suited at illustrating genetic relationships between samples with a narrow genetic background than the BI method.
FST is the most commonly reported statistic for the assessment of genetic differentiation (Balloux and Lugon-Moulin,
2002). The FST value reflects the amount of genetic differentiation between populations. An FST value between 0 and 0.05
indicates little genetic differentiation, from 0.05 to 0.15 suggests moderate differentiation, from 0.15 to 0.25 indicates strong
differentiation, and over 0.25 reflects very strong genetic differentiation (Curnw and Wright, 1979). Our FST of 0.0298
calculated for the seven African populations of H. altissima is generally considered to imply low genetic differentiation;
however, such a low FST value may actually indicate important genetic differentiation that is by no means negligible (Curnw
and Wright, 1979).
Author contributions
Lin-kai Huang and Jian Zhang conceived and designed the experiments; Xiu Huang and Lu Lu performed the experiments;
Xiu Huang, De-jun Huang, Lu Lu, and Han-dong Yan analyzed the data; Jian Zhang, Xiu Huang, De-jun Huang, Yu Zhang, Lin-
kai Huang, Lu Lu, and Han-dong Yan contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Jian Zhang and Xiu Huang wrote the
paper.
Conflicts of interest
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by Strategic Planning and Management Innovation of Science and Technology Support
Demonstration Project of Chongqing Modern Cattle and Sheep Industry (cstc2014zktjccxbx0021), and Modern Agro-industry
Technology Research System (CARS-35-05). We thank Dr. Fang-luan Gao (Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University) for
comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript.
References
Bakker, F.T., Culham, A., Daugherty, L.C., Gibby, M., 1999. A trnL-F based phylogeny for species of Pelargonium (Geraniaceae) with small chromosomes. Plant
Syst. Evol. 216, 309e324.
Balloux, F., Lugon-Moulin, N., 2002. The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Mol. Ecol. 11, 155e165.
Batnini, M.A., Bourguiba, H., Trifi-Farah, N., Krichen, L., 2014. Chloroplast DNA sequence data provides new insights into genetic diversity and phylogenetic
relationships of Tunisian apricot germplasm. Sci. Hortic. 178, 241e247.
Chang, Y.J., Cao, Y.F., Zhang, J.M., Tian, L.M., Dong, X.G., Zhang, Y., Qi, D., Zheng, Y.C., 2014. Studies on genetic diversity of pear germplasm resources in
Liaoning province of China based on chloroplast DNA analysis. Acta Hortic. Sin. 41, 1307e1316.
Chen, C.W., Huang, Y.M., Kuo, L.Y., Nguyen, Q.D., Luu, H.T., Callado, J.R., Farrar, D.R., Chiou, W.L., 2013. trnL-F is a powerful marker for DNA identification of
field vittarioid gametophytes (Pteridaceae). Ann. Bot. 111, 663e673.
Chen, Y.X., Zhang, X.Q., Ma, X., Xie, W.G., 2011. Association analysis between SSR molecular markers and agronomic characters of Hemarthria compressa.
Hubei Agric. Sci. 7, 059.
Clegg, M.T., Gaut, B.S., Learn, G.H., Morton, B.R., 1994. Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91, 6795e6801.
Curnw, R.N., Wright, S., 1979. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 4: Variability within and among Natural Populations. Biometrics 35, 359.
Demesure, B., Sodzi, N., Petit, R.J., 1995. A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast
DNA in plants. Mol. Ecol. 4, 129e134.
100 J. Zhang et al. / Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 69 (2016) 91e100
Dolphin, K., Belshaw, R., Orme, C.D.L., Quicke, D.L.J., 2000. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Mol.
Phylogenet. Evol. 17, 401e406.
D'Aloia, C.C., Azodi, C.B., Sheldon, S.P., Trombulak, S.C., Ardren, W.R., 2015. Genetic models reveal historical patterns of sea lamprey population fluctuations
within Lake Champlain. PeerJ 3, e1369.
Excoffier, L., Lischer, H.E.L., 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol.
Ecol. Resour. 10 (3), 564e567.
€hl, A., 2004. Network 4.2. 0.1. Fluxus Technology Ltda. Software available free at www. fluxus-engineering. com.
Forster, P., Bandelt, H.J., Ro
Gill, E.E., Fast, N.M., 2006. Assessing the microsporidia-fungi relationship: combined phylogenetic analysis of eight genes. Gene 375, 103e109.
Gong, X., Luan, S.S., Hung, K.H., Hwang, C.C., Lin, C.J., Chiang, Y.C., Chiang, T.Y., 2011. Population structure of Nouelia insignis (Asteraceae), an endangered
species in southwestern China, based on chloroplast DNA sequences: recent demographic shrinking. J. Plant Res. 124, 221e230.
Guan, M.M., Ma, R., Gong, X., 2013. Conservation genetics of and endemic plant, Anemoclema glaucifolium, in the Jinsha river valley. Plant Divers. Resour. 35,
555e562.
Guindon, S., Delsuc, F., Dufayard, J.F., Gascuel, O., 2009. Estimating Maximum Likelihood Phylogenies with PhyML. Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence
Analysis. Springer, pp. 113e137.
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., Gascuel, O., 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phy-
logenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307e321.
Hall, B.G., 2005. Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 792e802.
Hu, Z.M., Uwai, S., Yu, S.H., Komatsu, T., Ajisaka, T., Duan, D.L., 2011. Phylogeographic heterogeneity of the brown macroalga Sargassum horneri (Fucaceae) in
the northwestern Pacific in relation to late Pleistocene glaciation and tectonic configurations. Mol. Ecol. 20, 3894e3909.
Huang, L.K., Huang, X., Yan, H.D., Yin, G.H., Zhang, X.Q., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y., Jiang, X.M., Yan, Y.H., Ma, X., 2014a. Constructing DNA fingerprinting of Hemarthria
cultivars using EST-SSR and SCoT markers. Genet. Resour. crop Evol. 61, 1047e1055.
Huang, L.K., Zhang, X.Q., Ma, X., Liu, W., Li, F., Zeng, B., 2008. Genetic differentiation among Hemarthria compressa populations in south China and its genetic
relationship with H. japonica. Hereditas 145, 84e91.
Huang, L.K., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, X.Q., Xie, W.G., Jiang, X.M., Peng, F., Yan, Y.H., Ma, X., Liu, W., et al., 2014b. Genetic stability and DNA fingerprinting of
the Hemarthria compressa cultivar “Guangyi”. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 55, 310e316.
Huang, X., Zhang, X.Q., Huang, L.K., Ma, Y.M., Yin, G.H., Lee, S., Zeng, J., Liu, H., 2014. Genetic diversity of Hemarthria altissima and its related species by EST-
SSR and SCoT markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 57, 338e344.
Huang, Y., 2012. Molecular Phylogenetics. Science Press, Beijing.
Hudson, W.G., 1986. Mole cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) damage to Hemarthria altissima: resistance or nonpreference? J. Econ. Entomol. 79, 961e963.
Huelsenbeck, J.P., Larget, B., Miller, R.E., Ronquist, F., 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51, 673e688.
Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754e755.
Juszczak, I., Rudnik, R., Pietzenuk, B., Baier, M., 2012. Natural genetic variation in the expression regulation of the chloroplast antioxidant system among
Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Physiol. Plant. 146, 53e70.
Katayama, H., Tachibana, M., Iketani, H., Zhang, S.L., Uematsu, C., 2012. Phylogenetic utility of structural alterations found in the chloroplast genome of pear:
hypervariable regions in a highly conserved genome. Tree Genet. Genomes 8, 313e326.
Kimura, T., Iketani, H., Kotobuki, K., Matsuta, N., Ban, Y., Hayashi, T., Yamamoto, T., 2003. Genetic characterization of pear varieties revealed by chloroplast
DNA sequences. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 78, 241e247.
Librado, P., Rozas, J., 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451e1452.
Murakami, A., Darby, P., Javornik, B., Pais, M.S.S., Seigner, E., Lutz, A., Svoboda, P., 2006. Molecular phylogeny of wild hops, Humulus lupulus L. Heredity 97,
66e74.
Negrisolo, E., Minelli, A., Valle, G., 2004. The mitochondrial genome of the house centipede Scutigera and the monophyly versus paraphyly of myriapods.
Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 770e780.
Newman, Y., Vendramini, J., Sollenberger, L.E., Quesenberry, K., 2011. Limpograss (Hemarthria Altissima): Overview and Management. EDIS Publication. SS-
AGR-320. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
Posada, D., 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1253e1256.
Quesenberry, K.H., Oakes, A.J., Jessop, D.S., 1982. Cytological and geographical characterizations of Hemarthria. Euphytica 31, 409e416.
Schank, S.C., Klock, M.A., Moore, J.E., 1973. Laboratory evaluation of quality in subtropical grasses: II. Genetic variation among Hemarthrias in in vitro
digestion and stem morphology. Agron. J. 65, 256e258.
Schmidt, H.A., Strimmer, K., Vingron, M., von Haeseler, A., 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel
computing. Bioinformatics 18, 502e504.
Shimodaira, H., Hasegawa, M., 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17, 1246e1247.
Simmons, M.P., Pickett, K.M., Miya, M., 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 188e199.
Swindell, S.R., Plasterer, T.N., 1997. Seqman. Methods in Molecular Biology, pp. 75e89.
Swofford, D., 1998. PAUP 4.0: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Informatics, p. 1455.
Vaidya, G., Lohman, D.J., Meier, R., 2011. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon
information. Cladistics 27, 171e180.
Wu, Y.Q., Du, Y., 2000. Some reproductive characteristics of Hemarthria compressa. J. Sichuan Agric. Univ. 18, 262e264.
Xia, X.H., Lemey, P., 2009. Assessing Substitution Saturation with DAMBE. The Phylogenetic Handbook: a Practical Approach to DNA and Protein Phylogeny,
2, pp. 615e630.
Yan, H.D., Zhang, X.Q., Fu, C., Huang, L.K., Yin, G.H., Nie, G., Xu, W.Z., Liu, X.C., Chen, T., Lee, S., et al., 2015. Chloroplast DNA variation and genetic structure of
Miscanthus sinensis in southwest China. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 58, 132e138.
Yang, C.H., Zhang, X.Q., Li, X.L., Du, Y., Wu, Y.Q., 2004. Hemarthria germplasm resources and breeding. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 13, 7e12.