An Examination of the Impact of Computer
An Examination of the Impact of Computer
Hicham Laabidi
Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fes, Morocco
e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of computer skills on the
successful integration of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in
Moroccan higher education institutions. Actually, the survival of these institutions in
the expansion of modern technologies depends on their readiness to qualify
professors and students to implement ICTs for educational objectives. Because of
the significant role that computer technologies play in today’s job markets, higher
education institutions are required to provide the most appropriate learning and
teaching conditions for both professors and students to make effective use of these
new technologies within classroom practices. The findings revealed that teachers
consider ICTs very essential in their teaching. However, there are low levels of
computer technology integration in teaching processes. This lack of computer
technology use in instruction is attributed to several factors. One of these various
factors is teachers’ computer skills. It has been found that there are statistically
significant differences between professors’ use of ICT with respect to their computer
skills, F (4,158) = 32.776, p<0.05.
Keywords : computer skills, Information and Communication Technologies, higher
education institutions, classroom practices
1. INTRODUCTION
It is apparent that computer technology has become an important part of our daily
lives. “Whether or not we touch a computer, it is almost impossible to escape its
daily influence on us; from speedy information transmittal, printouts, and receipts, to
control of lights and temperature of our workplaces” (Deaton, 1990,p.1). If schools
and universities tend to prepare learners for today’s job market, they should
encourage the integration of computer technologies into the curriculum (Soine,
1996). If these educational institutions are not utilizing ICT, they are neglecting a
significant portion of their learners’ environment (Cummings, 1998). In fact ,“
convergence of the economic necessities called into question the effectiveness of the
educational system to prepare the future workforce with adequate amounts of human
capital ( knowledge, skills, and dispositions) to compete in world markets and
economies” (Hornbeck & Salamon, 1991,p.65)
Therefore; teachers, in this information technological age, should know both the
subject matter they instruct and the different effective ways this subject matter may
be changed using computer technologies (Misha & Koehler, 2006). They are
required to develop sufficient knowledge about technologies such as computers, the
Internet and digital videos. This knowledge should incorporate how to install and
remove several significant software programmes. In other words, they are required
to master the necessary skills to operate different software tools especially word
processors, Internet browsers, spreadsheets, and email (Mishra & Koehler, 2006).
This is due to the fact that there has been a shift from a focus on information
transmission through books and chalk to a concentration on information processing
via computers and the internet (Barker, 1994).
Numerous studies have indicated that there is a strong positive correlation between
students’ achievements and the use of ICT in the classroom. Schacter (1999) carried
out a meta-analysis of more than 700 research studies done within the state of West
Virginia with samples of learners who had access to several kinds of technologies in
their learning. He claimed that the targeted students showed “positive gains in
achievement on research constructed tests, standard tests, and national tests” (p.9).
Schacter’s feedback reinforced the necessity for instructors to include technology
into the educational environment. Similarly, Waxman, Connell, and Gray (2002)
conducted a research study which reviewed both quantitative and quasi-experimental
research publications from 1997 to 2002 related to the influence of computer
technology on learners’ achievement. They found that the implementation of ICT
within classroom practices has positive effects on students’ learning.
Prensky (2001) stated that technology has changed education especially the learner.
The student of the 21st century has directly been affected since “ they are used to
the instantaneity of hypertext, download music, phones in their pockets, a library on
their laptops, beamed messages and instant messaging” (Presnsky, 2001, p.4).
According to Matusevich (1995), technology has restructured the whole process of
learning and teaching in the sense that it has helped students to reshape their
learning strategies.
Bull (2005) stated that computer technology integration could help learners develop
their thinking skills and creative abilities in the sense that they have access to more
technological tools outside of educational institutions than inside schools. This shift
“is largely occurring outside of schools, however with little integration in the
curriculum within school walls. Despite progress, use of these technologies by
students within schools remains limited, largely confined to visits to school
laboratories on special occasions” (Bull, 2005, p.11). Actually, there is an increasing
tendency among students to make use of several different technological devices to
generate content (Lenhart, Simpson and Graziano, 2001). So, educators cannot
overlook the imperative necessity to integrate these technologies within their
classrooms (Bates, 2006; Chamblis, 2003; Fox, 2007; Obler & Schiorring, 2002;
Falmer, 2012; Thang, et al., 2016; Ganapathy, et al., 2017).
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Firstly, it is must be admitted that there is little agreement among researchers on an
exact definition of computer experience (Thompson et al., 2006). Thompson et al.
(2006) stated that computer experience refers to the habit of making use of
technological instruments and the development of “the skills and abilities that one
gains through using a technology” (p.43). Individuals’ experience with computers
can be measured based on some important criteria such as ownership of a computer,
type of computer training, years of use and the frequency of utilizing computer
technology (Potosky & Bobko, 1998). In this context, it is vital to note that Marquie,
Thon & Baracat (1994) conducted a study to investigate the relationship between
computer attitudes, computer experience and the quality of computer training they
received. The researchers revealed that the most influential variable that has a great
impact on attitudes was computer experience. So, teachers’ use of computer
technology in their teaching may be affected by the level and the kind of experience
with computers they have received (Woods et al., 2004; Christensen, 2002).
Despite the accessibility of computer technologies in various educational
institutions, many college professors are hesitant to integrate ICT and modify their
way of teaching (Dusick, 1998; Hunt & Bohlin, 1995; Yildirim, 2000) and the
teachers of English do not integrate ICT tools on a regular basis due to the existence
of several barriers related to teachers as well as the institutions (Laabidi & Laabidi,
2016; Chouit, et al., 2017). Several other teachers, on the other hand, expand efforts
in order to ameliorate their knowledge and experience in the use of educational
technologies (Bai-Chuvessiriporn & Lehmam, 2001). High levels of computer
experience improve individuals’ perceptions of computer competency and computer
importance (Czaja & Sharit ,1998). The level of computer experience has a great
influence over attitudes regarding the use of computer technology (Koohang &
Byrd, 1987) . In fact, the amount of computer experience is thought to have a great
influence over teachers’ attitudes regarding the use of computer technology for
instructional purposes (Koohang & Byrd, 1987) .
Professors with earlier exposure to computer technologies normally demonstrate
more concern in using ICT across the curriculum (Bradley & Russell, 1997).
However, professors who do not have any previous computer experience are
Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, Vol. 2 (1), 2017 55
An Examination of the Impact of Computer Skills on the Effective Use of ICT
a key factor that helps teachers develop favourable attitudes regarding the
integration of ICT in teaching process.
Bradley and Russell (1997) carried out a research study to examine the role of
experience on the growth of computer skills and attitudes. The distinction between
their investigation and the former ones lies in the fact that they established a
difference between quantity and quality of previous experiences. They emphasized
that the better the quality of the training, the more favourable attitudes teachers
develop regarding the adoption of ICT in the classroom. Besides, Levy (2003)
conducted a survey to examine the different factors that should be taken into account
when universities intend to encourage professors to adopt computer technology in
the classrooms. The findings indicated that
Due to the current lack of adequate support at most institutions of higher
education, online distance learning instructors must have adequate technology
skills. They often need to upload their own files, deal with hardware and
software problems, and help students overcome their own problems with the
technology. Instructors must be able to design their courses, making sure they
are accessible to disabled students. (p.4)
Computer experience has been considered as one of the most influential factors
affecting computer usage (Glass & Knight, 1998; Laabidi, 2016). Greater levels of
computer experience means less computer anxiety and higher positive attitudes
toward the use of computer technologies (Howard & Smith, 1986). According to
Glass & Knight (1998), computer experience is a significant predictor of computer
anxiety. Also, they revealed that adequate computer experience means lack of
computer anxiety and higher levels of positive attitudes toward computers. When
teachers receive enough experience working with computers, their computer anxiety
decreases (Anderson & Reed, 1998). Yang, Mohamed and Beyerbach (1999)
undertook their investigation to account for how computer experience influences the
connection of teachers’ computer anxiety and their characteristics namely age,
gender, subject area, kind of institution and educational level. They concluded that
most of participants who were engaged in computer-based training have favourable
attitudes regarding the integration of computer technologies in classroom activities.
Also, Yang et al. found that computer experience affects computer anxiety which is
connected with the teachers’ characteristics of age and subject taught.
Bradley & Russell (1997) proclaimed that the most influential factor regarding
attitudes toward computer technology is the quality rather than the quantity of
previous computer experiences. In their study of office workers regarding computer
attitudes, computer experience and the level of training, Marquie, Thon, & Baracat
(1994) reported that computer experience is the most significant factor that affects
their attitudes toward computers. Also, they found that computer users who are
highly experienced believe that computers are more useful and more valuable than
those users who possess less computer experience. Rogers (2000) mentioned that
having the required computer skills represent a vital factor which influences
professors’ choice of whether or not to integrate computer technology in their
teaching. Therefore, faculty members are required to develop appropriate
Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, Vol. 2 (1), 2017 57
An Examination of the Impact of Computer Skills on the Effective Use of ICT
Figure 4. Means Plot for computer skills and ICT use in teaching.
As shown in the means plot above, it can be noted that professors who had advanced
or very advanced computer skills are likely to make more use of the new
technologies for instructional objectives. Indeed, respondents who had low or very
low computer skills do not integrate these technologies frequently in their
classrooms.
Table 2 One-way between groups ANOVA for computer skills and ICT use in teaching.
It is clear from table 2 that there are statistically significant differences between
professors’ use of ICT with respect to their computer skills, F(4,158)=
32.776,p<0.05 .The test found that the p value (p =0.000) was smaller than the
significant level set at 0.05 (2-tailed). Therefore, the null hypothesis indicating that
there were no significant differences between the two variables was rejected.
From the results shown above (Table 3), it is clear that group 5 (very advanced) is
statistically different from group 1 (very low) and group 2 ( low) .This difference
indicates that respondents who had very advanced computer skills integrate ICT in
their teaching more frequently than those who had low or very low computer skills.
Indeed, the findings also revealed that very advanced respondents are not
statistically different those who had average or advanced computer skills.
5. DISCUSSION
The findings showed that professors’ computer skill is an important factor in relation
with technology integration in teaching. After reviewing the data analysis for the
research question, the null hypothesis stating that there were not any differences
between teachers’ use of ICT based on computer skills was rejected because
significance differences were found between the independent and dependent
variables, F(4,158)= 32.776,p<0.05. The results revealed that professors who
possessed very advanced computer skills scored the highest mean ( M=2.71,
SD=0.29). However, professors who had low ( M=0.46, SD=0.23) or very low
computer skills ( M=0.64, SD=0.85) obtained the lowest means. This means that
teachers who are very proficient in using ICT gadgets demonstrated high levels of
computer technology implementation than those who have less computer
competency. The more computer proficiency teachers possess, the higher their levels
of ICT integration. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the factor of
computer skills appears to influence professors’ use of computer technology in the
classrooms.
These results support the findings of Wozney et al. (2006) who found that there was
a significant positive correlation between computer proficiency and the actual
integration of ICT for pedagogical purposes, meaning that as computer competency
rises, the levels of computer technology increase as well. Furthermore, Woodrow
(1992) concluded that college professors with high levels of computer skills tend to
show greater interest in utilizing the new innovative technologies into their
curriculum. Similar findings were reported by Yildirim (2000) who conducted a
study including 117 faculty members at California community colleges. The
researcher found that the more computer skills faculty members have, the more
confident they are with computers, and the more they are expected to integrate ICT
in teaching and learning processes.
6. CONCLUSION
Moroccan university English language teachers view information and
communication technology tools as very essential in their teaching practices.
Actually, teachers are aware of the importance of utilizing computer technologies
for pedagogical purposes. However, it was found that there are several barriers that
impede the successful adoption of ICTs in the classroom. In fact, universities must
go beyond the policy of providing more sophisticated technological equipments in
the classrooms. Instead, the designers of professional development plans are
required to provide programs that would help professors acquire suitable
technological skills and thus enhance students’ achievements. When employed
7. REFERENCES
Anderson, D., & Reed, W.(1998). The effects of Internet instruction, prior computer
experience, and learning style on teachers’ Internet attitudes and knowledge.
Journal Educational Computing Research, 19(3), 227-246.
Bai, H., Chuvessiriporn, S., & Lehman, J.(2001). Impact of P3T3 on faculty use of
Web course tool .From http://p3t3.soe.purdue.edu/WebTool.pdf.
Barker, F. (1994). Integrating computer usage in the classroom curriculum through
teacher training. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 751)
Bates, A. W. (2006). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and
university leaders. Retrieved June 17th, 2015 from http://media.wiley.com
Bates, T., & Epper, R.M. (2001). Teaching faculty how to use technology: Best
practice from leading institutions. The American Council on Education and
The Oryx Press. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San
Francisco, California 94104.
Bradley, G., & Russell, G. (1997). Computer experience, school support, and
computer anxiety. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 267-284.
Bull, G. (2005). Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Contemporary Issues in
Technology and Teacher Education, 5, (3/4).
Chamblis, C. (2003). Managing academic departments: Protecting productivity in
the face of staffing and technology changes. Retrieved from ERIC.
Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes
of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,
34(4), 411-433.
Chouit, D., Nfissi, A., Laabidi, H. (2017). Exploring the Correlation between
Professors’ Use of ICT in Teaching and the Levels of Institutional Support.
JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics), 2(1), 2017.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v2i1.39
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Cumminngs, C. A. (1998). Teacher attitudes and effective computer integration.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 419 512).
Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (1998). Age differences in attitudes toward computers.
Journal of Gerontology, 53B, 329-340.
Davidson, J. ( 1989). Children and computers together in the early childhood
classroom. Albany, NY : Delmar Publishers.
Deaton, M. P. (1990). Computer integration in the primary grades. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Services No. ED 337 137).
DuPagne, M., & Krendl, K.A. ( 1992). Teachers’ attitudes toward computers : A
review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24,
420-429.
Dusick, D. M., & Yildirim, S. (2000). Faculty computer use and training:
Identifying distinct needs for different populations. Community College
Review, 27(4), 33-45.
Dusick, D.M. ( 1998).What social factors influence faculty members’ use of
computers for teaching? A literature review. Journal of Research on
Computing Education, 3(20), 123-137.
Dyck, J. L., & Smither, J. A. (1994). Age differences in computer anxiety: The role
of computer experience, gender, and education. Journal of Educational
Computing Research, 10, 239-247.
Falmer, Roger. (2012). A Third Way: Online Labs Integrated With Print Materials.
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 2012. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v2i1.660
Fox, B. (2007). Teaching through technology: Changing practices in two
universities. International Journal on E-learning, 6 (2), 187-203.
Ganapathy, M., et al. (2017). Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills via Teaching
Practices. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 23(1), 2017. DOI:
http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-06
Glass, C., & Luanne, K.(1998). Cognitive Factors in Computer Anxiety. Cognitive
Therapy and Research, 12, 351-366.
Hornbeck, David A. & Salamon, Lester M. (1991). Human capital andamerica's
future. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hunt, N.P., & Bohlin, R.M. ( 1995). Events and practices that promote positive
attitudes and emotions in computing courses. Journal of Research on
Computing in Teacher Education, 11(3), 21-23.
Jay, G., & Willis, S. (1992). Influence of direct computer experience on older adults
attitudes toward computers. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Science,
47, 250-257.
Kagima, L. K. & Hausafus, O. (2000). Integration of electronic communication in
higher education: contributions of faculty computer self-efficacy. The internet
and Higher Education, 2(4), 221-235.
Kay, R. (1999). Understanding gender differences in computer attitudes, aptitude
and use: An innovation to computers. The computer Attitude Measure (CAM),
Computer in Human Behavior, 9, 31-386.
Koohang, A., & Byrd, D. (1987). A study of selected variables and further study.
Library and Information Science Research, 9(1), 105-111.
Krauss, I., & Hoyer, W. ( 1984). Technology and the older person: Age, sex, and
experience as moderators of attitudes towards computers. New York: Plenum
Press.
Laabidi, Hicham. (2016). The Effect of Age on English Professors’ Integration of
the New Technologies in Teaching. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English
Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 1(1), 2016
Laabidi, Youssouf & Laabidi, Hicham. (2016). Barriers Affecting Successful
Integration of ICT in Moroccan Universities. JELTL (Journal of English
Language Teaching and Linguistics), 1(3), 2016
Lee, D. (1997). Factors influencing the cuss of computer skill learning among in-
service teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 139-141.
Lenhart, H., Simpson, M., & Graziano, M. (2001). The Internet and Education:
Findings of the Pew Internet and American life project. Retrieved August 11th,
2015 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Schools_Report.pdf
Levy, S. (2003). Six factors to consider when planning online distance learning
programs in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning
Administration, 6(1). Retrieved October 2nd , 2015, from
http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring61/levy61.htm.
Marquie, J., Thon, B., & Baracat, B.(1994). Age influence on attitudes of office
workers faced with new computerized technology. Applied Ergonomics, 25,
130-142.
Matusevich, M. (1995, May). School reform: What role can technology play in a
constructivist setting? Retrieved from
http://delta.cs.vt.edu/edu/fis/techcons.html
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge:
A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-
1054.
O’Quinn, L. & Corry, M. (2002). Factors that deter faculty from participating in
distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(4).
Retrieved September 2nd , 2014, from
http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/winter54/winter54.htm
Obler, S., & Schiorring, E. (2002). Ethnographic study: Technology training project
study. Retrieved from ERIC.
Oppenheimer, T. (1999). The computer delusion. In D.fallon (Ed.), Technology and
society: Perspectives (pp.69-81). Madison, WI: Course wise.
Panda, S. & Mishra, S (2007). E-Learning in a mega open university: Faculty
attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International, 44(4), 323-
338
Poole, M., & Jackson, M. (1993). Communication Theory and Group Support
Systems. New Perspectives, 281-293.
Potosky, D., & Bobko, P. (1998). The computer understanding and experience scale:
A self-report measure of computer experience. Computers in Human
Behavior, 14(2), 337-348.
Prensky, M. (2001, October). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9
(5), 1-6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
Rogers, P. L. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 455-472.
Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement:
What the most current research has to say. Retrieved June 3rd, 2014 from
http://www.mff.org/pbs/ME 161.pdf
Sigurdsson.J. (1991). Computer experience, attitudes toward computers and
personality characteristics in psychology undergraduates. Personality and
individual Differences, 12, 617-624.
Soine, R. M. (1996). Require students to gain computer skills – now what? Teaching
for Success, 8(2), 7.
Thang, SM., et al. (2016). ICT Tools Patterns of Use among Malaysian ESL
Undergraduates. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 16(1), 2016
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience.
MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
Thompson, R., Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (2006). Intentions to use information
technologies: An integrative model. Journal of Organizational and End User
Computing, 18(3), 25-47.
Vakalis, M.P. (1991). Attitudes of faculty towards computing: an investigation and
analysis of related variables. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on
Computer Science ( San Antonio, Texas, United States). CSC’91.ACM Press,
New York, NY, 694. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/327164.328861
Valentine. D. (2002). Distance learning: Promises, problems, and possibilities. The
Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5 (3). Retrieved October
15th , 2014, from
http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/valentine53.html.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance
of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-
478.
Waxman, H., Connell, M., & Gray, J. (2002, December). A quantitative synthesis of
recent research. Retrieved December 23rd, 2014 from
http://www.coe.ufl.edu/Courses/eme5054/Foundations/ Articles/waxman.pdf
Woodrow, J. E. (1992), The influence of programming training on the computer
literacy and attitudes of pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on
Computing in Education, 25(2), 200-218.
Woods, R., Baker, J. D., & Hopper, D. (2004). Hybrid structures: Instructors use and
perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face
instruction. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 281-297.
Woods, R., Baker, J. D., & Hopper, D. (2004). Hybrid structures: Instructors use and
perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face
instruction. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 281-297.
Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Implementing computer
technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and
Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.
Yang, H. H., Mohamed, D. A., & Beyerbach, B. A. (1999). An investigation of
computer anxiety among vocational-technical teachers. Journal of Industrial
Teacher Education, 37(1), 64-82.
Yildirim, S. ( 2000). Effects of an educational computing course on pre-service and
in-service teachers: A discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of
Research on Computing in Education, 32, 479-495.
Yildirim, S. ( 2000). Effects of an educational computing course on pre-service and
in-service teachers: A discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of
Research on Computing in Education, 32, 479-495.