Scribd
Upload
17 views9 pages

Guide for the development of the practical component and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Phase 2 - Educational and Pedagogical Practice

The document outlines the guidelines for the practical component of the Educational Research course at Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, focusing on research-based learning and participatory action research techniques. Students are required to plan and execute individual research activities, including designing surveys or interviews, analyzing qualitative papers, and participating in webinars and forums. Evaluation criteria are provided, detailing performance levels and scoring for various aspects of the practical component.

Uploaded by

Carolina Torres
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
17 views9 pages

Guide for the development of the practical component and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Phase 2 - Educational and Pedagogical Practice

The document outlines the guidelines for the practical component of the Educational Research course at Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, focusing on research-based learning and participatory action research techniques. Students are required to plan and execute individual research activities, including designing surveys or interviews, analyzing qualitative papers, and participating in webinars and forums. Evaluation criteria are provided, detailing performance levels and scoring for various aspects of the practical component.

Uploaded by

Carolina Torres
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


General Guide for the Development of the Practical Component of the Course:
Educational Research 518024

1. General Information of the Practical Component

Learning strategy: Research-based Learning


Course type: Methodological
Evaluation moment: Intermediate
Highest score of the component: 130 points
Number of activities of the practical component registered in this guide: 2
With the development of this component students are expected to achieve
the following learning outcome:

Plan the phases based on the participatory action research techniques.

2. General Activity Description of the Practical Component.

Scenarios of the practical component: In situ (practice)


Activity type: Individual
Activity number: 2
Highest score of the activity: 130 points
The activity starts on: Monday, February The activity ends on: Thursday, March
17, 2025 20, 2025
The resources required for the development of this activity are the
following:

• Virtual campus.
• Google Form for survey design.
• Forms of the traceability of pedagogical and educational practice.
• Classrooms or scenarios for the application of the designed tests.

The activity consists of planning your practice: individual

1
Step 1:

You must focus on the research experience (problem statement) taken from the course
Technology in Foreign Language Teaching.

Step 2:

Regarding this research experience, you must design of data collection instruments:
surveys, interviews, choosing and designing one according to the context of the
practice using IA tools:

2.1 If you chose to design one (1) survey with Likert scale in two directions of
values or Bipolar. Keep in mind, this survey must have ten (10) questions and be
written:
• In affirmative way.
• In accordance with the deficiencies described in the diagnosis.

This survey must be designed with Google Forms. When you finish designing the
survey, a link is generated and you must save it to send it to your students to
apply the survey.

2.2 If you chose to design one (1) interview. This interview must have ten (10)
questions using Wh-questions for collecting the data regarding the course Technology
in Foreign Language Teaching. This interview must be applied to students, teachers,
headmaster, institution’s staff.

2
Step 3:
You must analyze three qualitative-approached papers sent by your tutor by following
these points:
Title:
Abstract:
Main variables:
How is it correlated with your research:
What didactic recommendations would you
make to the author of the document:

Step 4:
You must complete Anexo 1 - Asistencia and Anexo 2 - Plan de Trabajo (Both, you can
download here). Please, include only the dates of the activities.

Step 5:
Active involvement in the Webinar and the first EPICA strategy.

Step 6:
Students must take part at forum arguing critically and proactively with respect to the subject
matter covered in EPICA.

Step 7:
The student creates a folder on drive to upload all forms of practice:

You can see the instructions on how to create a folder on drive from the
institutional mail. Please, verify that the link is public so that both the course
director and the teachers of the network can access the information registered

3
in this, and share the link with your UNAD’s teacher.

Step 8:
The student must share the drive with all these separate files in PDF: ARL, Practice
Letter, Anexo 1 - Asistencia and Anexo 2 - Plan de Trabajo with 12 hours signed
physically by the supervisor.

For this Phase 2, the student must complete a total of 12 hours divided as chart:

Description of hours for this phase.


Practice setting 12 Hours

TOTAL 12 Hours

For the development of the practical component consider that:


In the Initial Information Environment, you must:
▪ Check the Course Agenda to organize your time.
▪ Check all available forums.
▪ Verify your tutors’ synchronous attention by TEAMS.

In the Learning Environment, you must:


▪ Check the Course Contents and Bibliographic References for Unit 1.
▪ Go to the discussion forum for the step and get familiar with your
collaborative group.
▪ Participate in the forum to get feedback from e-mates and tutor.

In the Evaluation Environment, you must:


Submit the final ZIP document identifying your file as follows:
Phase_2_518024_Group_Full Name.

4
Evidence of individual work:
The individual evidence to be submitted is:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:


A ZIP file named Phase 2_518024_Group_Full Name with the following files:

▪ Your Anexo 2 - Plan de Trabajo


▪ Attendance to practice setting Anexo 1 - Asistencia physically signed by
supervisor
▪ Design of one survey or interview (Please, do not add screenshots).
▪ The analysis of three qualitative-approached papers (Please, do not add
screenshots).
▪ This ZIP file must be submitted by Evaluation Environment. Each file must be
delivered separately.

Evidence of collaborative work:


No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

3. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidence

For Individual evidence, consider the following:

▪ Check all the references before starting the activity.

▪ Be sure to revise content, structure, and mechanics in everything you post in


the forums and/or sent for evaluation.

▪ Before submitting the requested product, student should check that it meets
all the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.

5
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:


a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

4. Evaluation Rubric Template

Activity type: Individual


Activity number: 2
Evaluation moment: Intermediate
The highest score possible is 130 points
Criteria Performance levels
First evaluation
criterion: High Level: The student designs the data collection
instrument applying the appropriate conventions and structures
The design of the for qualitative research.
data collection If your work is at this level, you can get between 40
instrument. points and 70 points
This criterion Average Level: The student designs the data collection
represents 70 instrument but he does not apply the appropriate conventions
points of the total and structures for qualitative research.
of 130 points of
the activity.

6
If your work is at this level, you can get between 10
points and 39 points

Low level: The student does not design the data collection
instrument.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 9 points

Second evaluation High Level: The data collection instrument adequately


criterion: promotes the identification of the research variables in
accordance with your problem statement.
The relashionship
between data If your work is at this level, you can get between 16
collection points and 10 points
instrument and the
main variables. Average Level: The data collection instrument moderately
promotes the identification of the research variables in
This criterion accordance with its stated problem.
represents 10
If your work is at this level, you can get between 8
points of the total
points and 10 points
of 130 points of
the activity.
Low level: The students does not design the data collection
instrument or he designes it with another problem statement.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 7 points

Third evaluation High Level: The student analyzes the three qualitative-
criterion: approached papers with critical thinking in accordance with the
conventions and structures appropriate for qualitative research.
The analysis the
qualitative- If your work is at this level, you can get between 6
approached papers points and 10 points
with critical
thinking.
Average Level: The student moderately analyzes the three
qualitative-approached papers with critical thinking in
This criterion
represents 10 accordance with the conventions and structures appropriate for
points of the total qualitative research.

7
of 130 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 3
the activity. points and 5 points

Low level: The student does not analyze the three qualitative-
approached papers with critical thinking in accordance with the
conventions and structures appropriate for qualitative research.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0


points and 2 points
Fourth evaluation High level: The student significantly appropriates the concepts
criterion: and contributions made in the course’s webinar through his or
her participation.
The meaningful
comprehension of If your work is at this level, you can get between 20
the educational points and 30 points
research concepts.
Average level: The student moderately appropriates the
This criterion concepts and contributions made in the course’s webinar
represents 30 through his or her participation.
points of the total
of 130 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 10
the activity. points and 19 points

Low level: The student does not attend to the course’s


webinar.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0


points and 9 points

Fifth evaluation High level: The student completes all the pedagogical
criterion: practices traceability forms required in phase 2.

The practice forms If your work is at this level, you can get between 6
requested points and 10 points.

This criterion Average level: The student partially completes all the practice
represents 10 forms required for phase 2.
points of the total
of 130 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 3
the activity. points and 5 points

8
Low level: The student hardly completes all the practice forms
required for phase 2, or didn´t send them.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0


points and 2 points

You might also like