21CS735_Internet of Things

MODULE 3
Chapter 6
IoT Processing Topologies and Types
After reading this chapter, the reader will be able to:

• List common data types in IoT applications

• Understand the importance of processing
• Explain the various processing topologies in IoT
• Understand the importance of processing off-loading toward achieving scalability
and cost-effectiveness of IoT solutions
• Determine the importance of choosing the right processing topologies and
associated considerations while designing IoT applications
• Determine the requirements that are associated with IoT-based processing of
sensed and communicated data.

6.1 Data Format

The Internet is a vast space where huge quantities and varieties of data are generated
regularly and flow freely. As of January 2018, there are a reported 4.021 billion Internet
users worldwide. The massive volume of data generated by this huge number of users
is further enhanced by the multiple devices utilized by most users. In addition to these
data-generating sources, non-human data generation sources such as sensor nodes
and automated monitoring systems further add to the data load on the Internet. This
huge data volume is composed of a variety of data such as e-mails, text documents
(Word docs, PDFs, and others), social media posts, videos, audio files, and images,
as shown in Figure 6.1. However, these data can be broadly grouped into two types

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 116 Introduction to Internet of Things

21CS735_Internet of Things

based on how they can be accessed and stored: 1) Structured data and 2) unstructured
data.

Industry Transport Buildings Traffic Transaction Human

Figure 6.1 The various data generating and storage sources connected to the Internet and the
plethora of data types contained within it

6.1.1 Structured data

These are typically text data that have a pre-defined structure [1]. Structured data
are associated with relational database management systems (RDBMS). These are
primarily created by using length-limited data fields such as phone numbers, social
security numbers, and other such information. Even if the data is human or machine-
generated, these data are easily searchable by querying algorithms as well as human-
generated queries. Common usage of this type of data is associated with flight or
train reservation systems, banking systems, inventory controls, and other similar
systems. Established languages such as Structured Query Language (SQL) are used
for accessing these data in RDBMS. However, in the context of IoT, structured data
holds a minor share of the total generated data over the Internet.

6.1.2 Unstructured data

In simple words, all the data on the Internet, which is not structured, is categorized as
unstructured. These data types have no pre-defined structure and can vary according

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 IoT Processing Topologies and Types 117

21CS735_Internet of Things
to applications and data-generating sources. Some of the common examples of
human-generated unstructured data include text, e-mails, videos, images, phone
recordings, chats, and others [2]. Some common examples of machine-generated
unstructured data include sensor data from traffic, buildings, industries, satellite
imagery, surveillance videos, and others. As already evident from its examples, this
data type does not have fixed formats associated with it, which makes it very difficult
for querying algorithms to perform a look-up. Querying languages such as NoSQL
are generally used for this data type.

6.2 Importance of Processing in IoT

The vast amount and types of data flowing through the Internet necessitate the need
for intelligent and resourceful processing techniques. This necessity has become even
more crucial with the rapid advancements in IoT, which is laying enormous pressure
on the existing network infrastructure globally. Given these urgencies, it is important
to decide—when to process and what to process? Before deciding upon the processing to
pursue, we first divide the data to be processed into three types based on the urgency
of processing: 1) Very time critical, 2) time critical, and 3) normal. Data from sources
such as flight control systems [3], healthcare, and other such sources, which need
immediate decision support, are deemed as very critical. These data have a very low
threshold of processing latency, typically in the range of a few milliseconds.
Data from sources that can tolerate normal processing latency are deemed as time-
critical data. These data, generally associated with sources such as vehicles, traffic,
machine systems, smart home systems, surveillance systems, and others, which can
tolerate a latency of a few seconds fall in this category. Finally, the last category of
data, normal data,can tolerate a processing latency of a few minutes to a few hours
and are typically associated with less data-sensitive domains such as agriculture,
environmental monitoring, and others.
Considering the requirements of data processing, the processing requirements
of data from very time-critical sources are exceptionally high. Here, the need for
processing the data in place or almost nearer to the source is crucial in achieving
the deployment success of such domains. Similarly, considering the requirements of
processing from category 2 data sources (time-critical), the processing requirements
allow for the transmission of data to be processed to remote locations/processors such
as clouds or through collaborative processing. Finally, the last category of data sources
(normal) typically have no particular time requirements for processing urgently and
are pursued leisurely as such.

Difference between microprocessors and microcontrollers, network bandwidth,

network latency

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 118 Introduction to Internet of Things

21CS735_Internet of Things

6.3 Processing Topologies

The identification and intelligent selection of processing requirement of an IoT
application are one of the crucial steps in deciding the architecture of the deployment.
A properly designed IoT architecture would result in massive savings in network
bandwidth and conserve significant amounts of overall energy in the architecture
while providing the proper and allowable processing latencies for the solutions
associated with the architecture. Regarding the importance of processing in IoT as
outlined in Section 6.2, we can divide the various processing solutions into two large
topologies: 1) On-site and 2) Off-site. The off-site processing topology can be further
divided into the following: 1) Remote processing and 2) Collaborative processing.

6.3.1 On-site processing

As evident from the name, the on-site processing topology signifies that the data is
processed at the source itself. This is crucial in applications that have a very low
tolerance for latencies. These latencies may result from the processing hardware or
the network (during transmission of the data for processing away from the processor).
Applications such as those associated with healthcare and flight control systems (real-
time systems) have a breakneck data generation rate. These additionally show rapid
temporal changes that can be missed (leading to catastrophic damages) unless the
processing infrastructure is fast and robust enough to handle such data. Figure 6.2
shows the on-site processing topology, where an event (here, fire) is detected utilizing
a temperature sensor connected to a sensor node. The sensor node processes the
information from the sensed event and generates an alert. The node additionally has
the option of forwarding the data to a remote infrastructure for further analysis and
storage.

Environment Sensing Processing

On-site
processing

Temperature Sensor node

sensor

Figure 6.2 Event detection using an on-site processing topology

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 IoT Processing Topologies and Types 119

21CS735_Internet of Things

6.3.2 Off-site processing

The off-site processing paradigm, as opposed to the on-site processing paradigms,
allows for latencies (due to processing or network latencies); it is significantly cheaper
than on-site processing topologies. This difference in cost is mainly due to the low
demands and requirements of processing at the source itself. Often, the sensor
nodes are not required to process data on an urgent basis, so having a dedicated
and expensive on-site processing infrastructure is not sustainable for large-scale
deployments typical of IoT deployments. In the off-site processing topology, the
sensor node is responsible for the collection and framing of data that is eventually
to be transmitted to another location for processing. Unlike the on-site processing
topology, the off-site topology has a few dedicated high-processing enabled devices,
which can be borrowed by multiple simpler sensor nodes to accomplish their tasks. At
the same time, this arrangement keeps the costs of large-scale deployments extremely
manageable [5]. In the off-site topology, the data from these sensor nodes (data
generating sources) is transmitted either to a remote location (which can either be a
server or a cloud) or to multiple processing nodes. Multiple nodes can come together
to share their processing power in order to collaboratively process the data (which
is important in case a feasible communication pathway or connection to a remote
location cannot be established by a single node).

Remote processing
This is one of the most common processing topologies prevalent in present-day IoT
solutions. It encompasses sensing of data by various sensor nodes; the data is then
forwarded to a remote server or a cloud-based infrastructure for further processing
and analytics. The processing of data from hundreds and thousands of sensor nodes
can be simultaneously offloaded to a single, powerful computing platform; this results
in massive cost and energy savings by enabling the reuse and reallocation of the
same processing resource while also enabling the deployment of smaller and simpler
processing nodes at the site of deployment [4]. This setup also ensures massive
scalability of solutions, without significantly affecting the cost of the deployment.
Figure 6.3 shows the outline of one such paradigm, where the sensing of an event is
performed locally, and the decision making is outsourced to a remote processor (here,
cloud). However, this paradigm tends to use up a lot of network bandwidth and relies
heavily on the presence of network connectivity between the sensor nodes and the
remote processing infrastructure.

Collaborative processing
This processing topology typically finds use in scenarios with limited or no network
connectivity, especially systems lacking a backbone network. Additionally, this
topology can be quite economical for large-scale deployments spread over vast areas,
where providing networked access to a remote infrastructure is not viable. In such

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 120 Introduction to Internet of Things

21CS735_Internet of Things
scenarios, the simplest solution is to club together the processing power of nearby
Environment Sensing Network Remote
processing

Event: Fire Temperature Sensor node Internet

sensor

Figure 6.3 Event detection using an off-site remote processing topology

processing nodes and collaboratively process the data in the vicinity of the data
source itself. This approach also reduces latencies due to the transfer of data over
the network. Additionally, it conserves bandwidth of the network, especially ones
connecting to the Internet. Figure 6.4 shows the collaborative processing topology
for collaboratively processing data locally. This topology can be quite beneficial for
applications such as agriculture, where an intense and temporally high frequency
of data processing is not required as agricultural data is generally logged after
significantly long intervals (in the range of hours). One important point to mention
about this topology is the preference of mesh networks for easy implementation of
this topology.

Environment Sensing

Collaborative
network/mesh

Event: Fire Temperature Sensor

sensor node

Figure 6.4 Event detection using a collaborative processing topology

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 IoT Processing Topologies and Types 121

21CS735_Internet of Things

6.4 IoT Device Design and Selection Considerations

The main consideration of minutely defining an IoT solution is the selection of the
processor for developing the sensing solution (i.e., the sensor node). This selection is
governed by many parameters that affect the usability, design, and affordability of the
designed IoT sensing and processing solution. In this chapter, we mainly focus on the
deciding factors for selecting a processor for the design of a sensor node. The main
factor governing the IoT device design and selection for various applications is the
processor. However, the other important considerations are as follows.

• Size: This is one of the crucial factors for deciding the form factor and the
energy consumption of a sensor node. It has been observed that larger the form
factor, larger is the energy consumption of the hardware. Additionally, large form
factors are not suitable for a significant bulk of IoT applications, which rely on
minimal form factor solutions (e.g., wearables).
• Energy: The energy requirements of a processor is the most important
deciding factor in designing IoT-based sensing solutions. Higher the energy
requirements, higher is the energy source (battery) replacement frequency. This
principle automatically lowers the long-term sustainability of sensing hardware,
especially for IoT-based applications.
• Cost: The cost of a processor, besides the cost of sensors, is the driving force
in deciding the density of deployment of sensor nodes for IoT-based solutions.
Cheaper cost of the hardware enables a much higher density of hardware
deployment by users of an IoT solution. For example, cheaper gas and fire
detection solutions would enable users to include much more sensing hardware
for a lesser cost.
• Memory: The memory requirements (both volatile and non-volatile memory) of
IoT devices determines the capabilities the device can be armed with. Features
such as local data processing, data storage, data filtering, data formatting, and
a host of other features rely heavily on the memory capabilities of devices.
However, devices with higher memory tend to be costlier for obvious reasons.
• Processing power: As covered in earlier sections, processing power is vital
(comparable to memory) in deciding what type of sensors can be accommodated
with the IoT device/node, and what processing features can integrate on-site
with the IoT device. The processing power also decides the type of applications
the device can be associated with. Typically, applications that handle video and
image data require IoT devices with higher processing power as compared to
applications requiring simple sensing of the environment.

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 122 Introduction to Internet of Things

21CS735_Internet of Things

• I/O rating: The input–output (I/O) rating of IoT device, primarily the processor,
is the deciding factor in determining the circuit complexity, energy usage, and
requirements for support of various sensing solutions and sensor types. Newer
processors have a meager I/O voltage rating of 3.3 V, as compared to 5 V for the
somewhat older processors. This translates to requiring additional voltage and
logic conversion circuitry to interface legacy technologies and sensors with the
newer processors. Despite low power consumption due to reduced I/O voltage
levels, this additional voltage and circuitry not only affects the complexity of the
circuits but also affects the costs.

• Add-ons: The support of various add-ons a processor or for that matter, an IoT
device provides, such as analog to digital conversion (ADC) units, in-built clock
circuits, connections to USB and ethernet, inbuilt wireless access capabilities, and
others helps in defining the robustness and usability of a processor or IoT device
in various application scenarios. Additionally, the provision for these add-ons
also decides how fast a solution can be developed, especially the hardware part
of the whole IoT application. As interfacing and integration of systems at the
circuit level can be daunting to the uninitiated, the prior presence of these options
with the processor makes the processor or device highly lucrative to the users/
developers.

6.5 Processing Offloading

The processing offloading paradigm is important for the development of densely
deployable, energy-conserving, miniaturized, and cheap IoT-based solutions for
sensing tasks. Building upon the basics of the off-site processing topology covered
in the previous sections in this chapter, we delve a bit further into the various nuances
of processing offloading in IoT.
Figure 6.5 shows the typical outline of an IoT deployment with the various layers of
processing that are encountered spanning vastly different application domains—from
as near as sensing the environment to as far as cloud-based infrastructure. Starting
from the primary layer of sensing, we can have multiple sensing types tasked with
detecting an environment (fire, surveillance, and others). The sensors enabling these
sensing types are integrated with a processor using wired or wireless connections
(mostly, wired). In the event that certain applications require immediate processing of

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 IoT Processing Topologies and Types 123

21CS735_Internet of Things
the sensed data, an on-site processing topology is followed, similar to the one in Figure
6.2. However, for the majority of IoT applications, the bulk of the processing is carried
out remotely in order to keep the on-site devices simple, small, and economical.
Typically, for off-site processing, data from the sensing layer can be forwarded to
the fog or cloud or can be contained within the edge layer [6]. The edge layer makes
use of devices within the local network to process data that which is similar to the
collaborative processing topology shown in Figure 6.4. The devices within the local
network, till the fog, generally communicate using short-range wireless connections.
In case the data needs to be sent further up the chain to the cloud, long-range wireless
connection enabling access to a backbone network is essential. Fog-based processing is
still considered local because the fog nodes are typically localized within a geographic
area and serve the IoT nodes within a much smaller coverage area as compared to the
cloud. Fog nodes, which are at the level of gateways, may or may not be accessed by
the IoT devices through the Internet.

On-site Local Local Global

Environment

Temperature
sensor Database
Server

Cloud processing
Local processing

Edge processing

Event: Fire
Fog processing

Local
Sensing

network
clusters
Camera
Environment sensor Sensor Internet Server
node

Event: Surveillance
Temperature Server
sensor Database

Wired/
Communication

wireless Short
range
wireless Long range wireless/backbone

Backbone

Long range wireless/backbone

Long range wireless/backbone

Figure 6.5 The various data generating and storage sources connected to the Internet and the
plethora of data types contained within it

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 124 Introduction to Internet of Things

21CS735_Internet of Things

Finally, the approach of forwarding data to a cloud or a remote server, as shown

in the topology in Figure 6.3, requires the devices to be connected to the Internet
through long-range wireless/wired networks, which eventually connect to a backbone
network. This approach is generally costly concerning network bandwidth, latency, as
well as the complexity of the devices and the network infrastructure involved.
This section on data offloading is divided into three parts: 1) offload location
(which outlines where all the processing can be offloaded in the IoT architecture), 2)
offload decision making (how to choose where to offload the processing to and by how
much), and finally 3) offloading considerations (deciding when to offload).

6.5.1 Offload location

The choice of offload location decides the applicability, cost, and sustainability of the
IoT application and deployment. We distinguish the offload location into four types:

• Edge: Offloading processing to the edge implies that the data processing is
facilitated to a location at or near the source of data generation itself. Offloading
to the edge is done to achieve aggregation, manipulation, bandwidth reduction,
and other data operations directly on an IoT device [7].
• Fog: Fog computing is a decentralized computing infrastructure that is utilized
to conserve network bandwidth, reduce latencies, restrict the amount of data
unnecessarily flowing through the Internet, and enable rapid mobility support
for IoT devices. The data, computing, storage and applications are shifted to a
place between the data source and the cloud resulting in significantly reduced
latencies and network bandwidth usage [8].
• Remote Server: A simple remote server with good processing power may
be used with IoT-based applications to offload the processing from resource-
constrained IoT devices. Rapid scalability may be an issue with remote servers,
and they may be costlier and hard to maintain in comparison to solutions such
as the cloud [4].
• Cloud: Cloud computing is a configurable computer system, which can get
access to configurable resources, platforms, and high-level services through a
shared pool hosted remotely. A cloud is provisioned for processing offloading
so that processing resources can be rapidly provisioned with minimal effort over
the Internet, which can be accessed globally. Cloud enables massive scalability of
solutions as they can enable resource enhancement allocated to a user or solution
in an on-demand manner, without the user having to go through the pains of
acquiring and configuring new and costly hardware [9].

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 IoT Processing Topologies and Types 125

21CS735_Internet of Things
6.5.2 Offload decision making
The choice of where to offload and how much to offload is one of the major deciding
factors in the deployment of an offsite-processing topology-based IoT deployment
architecture. The decision making is generally addressed considering data generation
rate, network bandwidth, the criticality of applications, processing resource available
at the offload site, and other factors. Some of these approaches are as follows.
• Naive Approach: This approach is typically a hard approach, without too much
decision making. It can be considered as a rule-based approach in which the data
from IoT devices are offloaded to the nearest location based on the achievement
of certain offload criteria. Although easy to implement, this approach is never
recommended, especially for dense deployments, or deployments where the
data generation rate is high or the data being offloaded in complex to handle
(multimedia or hybrid data types). Generally, statistical measures are consulted
for generating the rules for offload decision making.
• Bargaining based approach: This approach, although a bit processing-intensive
during the decision making stages, enables the alleviation of network traffic
congestion, enhances service QoS (quality of service) parameters such as
bandwidth, latencies, and others. At times, while trying to maximize multiple
parameters for the whole IoT implementation, in order to provide the most
optimal solution or QoS, not all parameters can be treated with equal importance.
Bargaining based solutions try to maximize the QoS by trying to reach a point
where the qualities of certain parameters are reduced, while the others are
enhanced. This measure is undertaken so that the achieved QoS is collaboratively
better for the full implementation rather than a select few devices enjoying very
high QoS. Game theory is a common example of the bargaining based approach.
This approach does not need to depend on historical data for decision making
purposes.
• Learning based approach: Unlike the bargaining based approaches, the learning
based approaches generally rely on past behavior and trends of data flow
through the IoT architecture. The optimization of QoS parameters is pursued by
learning from historical trends and trying to optimize previous solutions further
and enhance the collective behavior of the IoT implementation. The memory
requirements and processing requirements are high during the decision making
stages. The most common example of a learning based approach is machine
learning.

6.5.3 Offloading considerations

There are a few offloading parameters which need to be considered while deciding
upon the offloading type to choose. These considerations typically arise from the
nature of the IoT application and the hardware being used to interact with the
application. Some of these parameters are as follows.

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE

 126 Introduction to Internet of Things

21CS735_Internet of Things
• Bandwidth: The maximum amount of data that can be simultaneously
transmitted over the network between two points is the bandwidth of that
network. The bandwidth of a wired or wireless network is also considered to
be its data-carrying capacity and often used to describe the data rate of that
network.
• Latency: It is the time delay incurred between the start and completion of an
operation. In the present context, latency can be due to the network (network
latency) or the processor (processing latency). In either case, latency arises due
to the physical limitations of the infrastructure, which is associated with an
operation. The operation can be data transfer over a network or processing of
a data at a processor.
• Criticality: It defines the importance of a task being pursued by an IoT
application. The more critical a task is, the lesser latency is expected from the
IoT solution. For example, detection of fires using an IoT solution has higher
criticality than detection of agricultural field parameters. The former requires a
response time in the tune of milliseconds, whereas the latter can be addressed
within hours or even days.

• Resources: It signifies the actual capabilities of an offload location. These

capabilities may be the processing power, the suite of analytical algorithms, and
others. For example, it is futile and wasteful to allocate processing resources
reserved for real-time multimedia processing (which are highly energy-intensive
and can process and analyze huge volumes of data in a short duration) to scalar
data (which can be addressed using nominal resources without wasting much
energy).
• Data volume: The amount of data generated by a source or sources that can be
simultaneously handled by the offload location is referred to as its data volume
handling capacity. Typically, for large and dense IoT deployments, the offload
location should be robust enough to address the processing issues related to
massive data volumes.

Prepared by :Prof.Suguna.A/Prof.Abirami.P ,Dept of CSE,SSCE