Report commissioned by:

Example Individual

Organisation:

Example Organisation

Example Containership

IMO Number: 123456789

INSPECTED IN AUSTRALIA
1st OCTOBER 2022
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

REPORT TERMS OF USE

This report is intended for the sole use of Example Individual and is designed to o er a condition evaluation of the subject
vessel, as found on the day of the survey and in the opinion of the surveyor concerned. The report is subject to any access
restrictions as described herein, and subject always to the level of cooperation a orded to the surveyor during the inspection
itself. All details are given in good faith, and without guarantee.

This report has been prepared and issued by Idwal Marine Services Ltd to its Customer, Example Individual of Example
Organisation, in accordance with, and subject to, the General Terms and Conditions of Idwal Marine Services Ltd, a copy of
which can be obtained at www.idwalmarine.com/terms-conditions. Attention is particularly drawn to restrictions on
reproduction and disclosure of, and limits on reliance on, this Report as more fully set out therein.

To access all documents related to this report, and verify the authenticity of its contents,
please view the full version available here:

customer.idwalmarine.com/0-0000

Pre-sale report reference: 0/0000

Report commissioned for: Example Individual

Organisation: Example Organisation

PDF generated for: [email protected]

Time & date: 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 1
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

CONTENTS

INSPECTION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .SUMMARY
....................................................................................................................................................
3

COMPARE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YOUR
. . . . . . . . . .IDWAL
. . . . . . . . . . .GRADE
5
...................................................................................................................................

KEY
. . . . . . .NOTABLE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ITEMS
..................................................................................................................................................
6

DECARBONISATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .SUMMARY
8
.........................................................................................................................................

GRADING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DATA
.........................................................................................................................................................
9

DESIGN
. . . . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . CONSTRUCTION
10
..............................................................................................................................................

HULL
..................................................................................................................................................................
11

MOORING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .DECKS
12
.................................................................................................................................................

WEATHER
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .DECKS
. . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . .FITTINGS
13
................................................................................................................................

BALLAST
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . TANKS
. . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . SYSTEMS
15
..................................................................................................................................

ACCOMMODATION
..................................................................................................................................................................
16

BRIDGE
. . . . . . . . . . . . AND
. . . . . . . .NAVIGATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EQUIPMENT
17
..........................................................................................................................

ENGINE
. . . . . . . . . . . . .ROOM
. . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . MACHINERY
...................................................................................................................................
18

FIRE
. . . . . . . .FIGHTING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .EQUIPMENT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . SYSTEMS
21
................................................................................................................

LIFESAVING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .APPLIANCES
...............................................................................................................................................
22

SAFE
. . . . . . . . WORKING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENVIRONMENT
23
..........................................................................................................................................

POLLUTION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONTROL
24
...............................................................................................................................................

ONBOARD
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MANAGEMENT
26
.................................................................................................................................................

VESSEL
. . . . . . . . . . . .CAPABILITIES
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . CARGO
. . . . . . . . . . . .SYSTEMS
27
..............................................................................................................

ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

Vessel documents

Vessel photos

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 2
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

INSPECTION SUMMARY
74 GRADE

VESSEL PA R TI C ULA R S

Ship Name Example

Previous Name Example

IMO Number 123456789

Port of Registry Example Port

Ship Type Example Ship Type

Flag Example Flag

Classification Society Example Class

Registered Owner Example Owner

Technical Manager Example Manager

Shipbuilder Example Shipbuilder

01/01/2014
Delivery Date
ExampleMT
Example 1 Oct 2022 Status: 6 Hours Limited Dead Weight
ExampleMT
Australia Loading Aboard documents
Gross Tonnage
provided Example MT
Net Tonnage
Example m
The Example Vessel is an example DWT, example Gross Tonnage, Length Overall
Example flagged, gearless Containership vessel built to a good standard Example m
by Example Shipbuilding, in China under Example Class supervision and Breadth
Examplem
was delivered on the 1st January 2014. The vessel remains Classed with Depth
Example m
Example Class.
Summer Draught
Example
A Pre-purchase Inspection of the vessel was conducted on the 1st TEU
Example MT
October 2022 in Sydney by Idwal under instruction from Example Owner. Lightweight

Good cooperation was provided by the ship’s crew however, no access

was granted to the cargo holds or ballast tanks. Limited documentation
was provided for review, including limited main and auxiliary engine
running hour data.

The vessel was alongside, loading at the time of inspection.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 3
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

The vessel was found to be in good overall condition with an Idwal Grade
above the average for vessels of a similar age, type and size but with a few
notable items found during the inspection. These are reported specifically in
the notable items section of this report.
The onboard management was found to be good with the Safety
Management system found to be well implemented and the vessel generally
found to provide a safe working environment. The Port State Control (PSC)
history was found to be good with 7 deficiencies and 0 detentions in the 5
inspections conducted in the past three years.
The vessel's Attained EEXI was calculated to be between 18.37 and 19.51,
which is above the required EEXI of 17.08, and therefore the vessel will
require the installation of technologies to reduce the EEXI score.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 4
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

COMPARE YOUR IDWAL GRADE

This section of the report allows you to compare your ship's grade with similar ships.

Your Idwal Grade vs other Feeder Container vessels This graph shows the distribution of
Idwal Grades against your ship's
Vessel Grade: 74 sector.

8
Percentage of Total Ships

Average Grade: 73
0
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90

Idwal Grade

Your Idwal Grade vs other Feeder Container vessels, age 5-10 years This graph shows your ship’s Idwal
Grade compared against other ships
inspected in the same sector, within a
90 similar age range, and how it
compares against the average Idwal
Grade for the sector.
80
Idwal Grade

70

60

50

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Ship Age

The ship’s grade may appear different when compared with the average of the two graphs. This is as a result of the second graph
comparing a smaller and more focused sample of ships.

For a more in-depth analysis of where your vessel compares amongst its peers, please contact your Idwal sales rep.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 5
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

KEY NOTABLE ITEMS

Estimated
Description Action / Timeline
Cost [USD]

The vessel does not use Environmentally Various upgrades and modifications $20000 - $50000
Acceptable Lubricants (EALs) in the stern may be required if the vessel wishes
tube or has an airseal and is therefore not to trade in the USA.
VGP compliant in this regard.

The vessel has one Condition of Authority The Condition should be thoroughly $1000 - $5000
as follows: The BWMS has not been addressed to Class satisfaction by the
commissioned at D-2 due date. due date.
Contingency measures according to IMO
Circular BWM.2/Circ.62 will be used for
managing non-compliant ballast water
discharges, until the installation and
commissioning is completed. Agreement
on contingency measures must be
obtained from the Coastal State of
destination before exercised and arrival of
coastal area. Due Date: 06 Dec 2022.

High running hours were noted on To be further investigated and any $20000 - $50000
auxiliary engines 2, 3 and 4 since the last required overhauls carried out as
overhaul. However, no set overhaul soon as practical.
intervals were provided.

Cargo hatch covers were seen to have Remedial cosmetic maintenance to <$1000
moderate scattered spot corrosion to the be carried out as soon as practical.
tops.

Scattered areas of corrosion noted to deck Remedial cosmetic maintenance to <$1000

plating under cross deck lashing walkways. be carried out as soon as practical.

Several draft markings found to be To be renewed as soon as practical. <$1000

covered with corrosion.

Scattered areas of corrosion were noted to Remedial cosmetic maintenance to <$1000

the main deck walkways and cross deck be carried out as soon as practical.
areas.

The boiler circulation pump pressure To be further investigated and <$1000

gauge was found to be damaged. rectified as soon as practical.

Gauges for LT fresh water cooling pump To be further investigated and <$1000
and fresh water heater unit were found to rectified as soon as practical.
be damaged.

ER air vent blower outlet cover, in way of To be further investigated and <$1000
auxiliary engine number 4, was found to rectified as soon as practical.
be missing.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 6
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

Windlass band brakes had only minimal Band brake linings to be renewed <$1000
thicknesses remaining. when possible.

Main and auxiliary engine performance Ensure all future engine performance <$1000
reports were seen to all have been carried tests are carried out at a minimum
out at a low loads. load of 70% as per good marine
practice.

Please note, all costs are estimations only, based on industry averages, and may vary depending on locations and scopes of
work. These costs are provided to assist the reader to consider the potential Capex or Opex impact of the related Notable Item
and should not be used for budgeting purposes without further internal assessment of their accuracy.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 7
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

DECARBONISATION SUMMARY

The vessel was delivered to the market before the EEDI requirements, and therefore has no EEDI score assigned. Based
on information provided by the vessel during the inspection, the Attained EEXI score was calculated to be between 18.37
and 19.51. This Attained EEXI score is above the required EEXI of 17.08, and therefore the vessel will require the
installation of technologies to reduce the EEXI score. For more information about technologies to reduce a vessel's EEXI,
the creation of the EEXI technical file or operational measures to reduce a vessel's Attained CII, please contact your Idwal
sales representative.

EEXI

Required EEXI Attained EEDI/EEXI

17.08 18.37 - 19.51

gCO 2/t.nm gCO 2/t.nm

Vessel does not meet the EEDI/EEXI requirement and requires additional retrofitting of technologies

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 8
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

74
GRADING DATA
GRADE

The Idwal Grade® is an industry recognised measure of asset integrity. Using proprietary algorithms, the Idwal Grade is
programmatically calculated from over 500 individual data points, captured during a rigorous and standardised inspection
process. Our data-driven methodology ensures that our reports are consistent, accurate and free from bias.

SUB GRADES

The methodology used to calculate the Idwal Grade® is also applied to the grading of the different vessel areas and categories.
Two key areas are the overall vessel condition and vessel management:

Condition 74 Management 73

The following are grades representing individual areas of interest of the vessel:

Design and Construction 80 Hull 70

Mooring Decks 80 Weather Decks and Fittings 70

Ballast Tanks and Systems 80 Accommodation 80

Bridge and Navigation Equipment 90 Engine Room and Machinery 60

Fire Fighting Equipment and Systems 80 Lifesaving Appliances 80

Safe Working Environment 80 Pollution Control 60

Onboard Management 70 Vessel Capabilities and Cargo Systems 70

Forthcoming Regulatory Compliance 60 Crew Welfare 80

Crew Performance 80 Safety Management 80

Planned Maintenance System (PMS) 80 Classification and Certification 70

PSC Performance 80

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 9
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

80
The construction and design was found to be hold a Class notation for In Water Surveys. No Cargo Lifting
good overall, with the vessel built to IACS Appliances are fitted. Apart from the equipment required by
standards and Rules in China by Example international rules and regulations, the bridge is also fitted
Shipbuilding with the keel laid in January 2013. The vessel is with integrated bridge system, machinery space control
a Containership, with 5 holds, driven by a xed pitch, direct system repeater panel and differential-GPS and the engine
drive propeller. The Main Engine is a NOx Tier 2, Hyundai room and machinery are fitted with incinerator sludge
Heavy Industries and the vessel has 4 Auxiliary Engines, burning system, UMS capabilities, 2-stroke engine
and no shaft generator. It is not on the Enhanced Survey mechanical lubricator and dual air handling unit
Program or Extended Dry Docking schedule but does refrigeration compressors.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 10
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

HULL

70
The hull was seen to be in a fair to good overall foulings. Areas of abrasions from fenders and tugs were also
condition, primarily due to the levels of corrosion noted. Hull markings were partly obscured, with several
noted, with the hull able to be inspected from the draft markings found to be covered with corrosion, with
port side only. The vessel was found to be free of both minor marine fouling observed. The vessel's last out of
major and minor structural defects and had only minor water bottom survey was carried out on 09-Sept-19, with the
localised spot corrosion, up to approximately 5% of the vessel’s next out of water bottom survey due by 21-Oct-24.
surface area, mainly located to midships boot top and anti-

NOTABLE ITEMS
Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: Several draft markings found to be covered with corrosion.

Corrective Action: To be renewed as soon as practical. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 11
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

MOORING DECKS

80
The Mooring decks were seen to be in a good replacement. Clutching and gearing arrangements were
condition overall with the decks found to be free sufficiently greased. Anchor chains and mooring ropes were
of structural defects and had only minor scattered in a good overall condition. Mooring practices were seen to
spot corrosion, up to approximately 2% of the mooring deck be good and snap-back zone warnings were seen to be
plating total surface area, mainly located to deck plating. posted at the entrances to mooring areas as per industry
Deck fittings were found to be in a good condition with best practice. The Bosun's store was in a fair overall
fairleads and mooring rollers free to turn when tested. All condition with it noted that the housekeeping could be
Electric windlasses and winches were reported to be fully improved upon. The bitter end release arrangements were
operational. Mooring machinery was in good condition seen to be clear and unobstructed and the emergency
however, band brake thicknesses were minimal, and require towing booklet seen to be available near to the Foc'sle.

NOTABLE ITEMS
Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: Windlass band brakes had only minimal thicknesses remaining.

Corrective Action: Band brake linings to be renewed when possible. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 12
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

WEATHER DECKS AND FITTINGS

70
The Weather Decks and Fittings were seen to be in and cross deck areas. Deck fittings were found to be in a
fair to good condition overall, primarily due to the good condition with pipework and fittings free of leakages.
levels of corrosion noted. The were decks found The accommodation ladders and gangways were in a good
to be free of structural defects and had only minor scattered overall condition, with no notable defects found, as were
spot corrosion, up to approximately 5% of the main deck provisions lifting appliances.
plating total surface area, mainly located to deck walkways

NOTABLE ITEMS
Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: Scattered areas of corrosion noted to deck plating under cross deck lashing walkways.

Corrective Action: Remedial cosmetic maintenance to be carried out as soon as practical. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 13
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: Scattered areas of corrosion were noted to the main deck walkways and cross deck areas.

Corrective Action: Remedial cosmetic maintenance to be carried out as soon as practical. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 14
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

BALLAST TANKS AND SYSTEMS

80
Ballast tanks and systems were deemed to be in a spot corrosion, up to approximately 2% of the ballast tanks
good overall condition. No tanks could be entered total surface area, mainly located to edges of supports.
due to however, a very small number of Ballast tank fittings such as ladders and pipework were seen
photographs of previous tank entries in 22-Sept-22 were to be in a good overall condition with Anodes seen to be
provided for review. Due to the small number of previous depleted up to 5%. Tanks were seen to have a minimal
inspection photos provided for review the condition of the amount of mud/sediment accumulation but were free of
tanks is primarily based upon vessels of a similar age, type any signs of staining from sewage or marine fouling. Ballast
and size. From the photographs provided, it was seen that control systems such as valves and gauges were reported to
the ballast tanks were found to be generally free of be fully operational and all ballast pumps were in good
significant structural defects and had only minor localised working order and in good visual condition.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 15
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

ACCOMMODATION

80
The accommodation areas were seen to be in a the galley hoods also found to be kept clean. The vessel's
good condition overall with floor and wall walk-in cold rooms were found to be clean and hygienic
coverings found to be in good condition and with temperatures at the required levels. Provision room
upholstery and furniture found to be free from components were seen to be generally free of frosting and
deterioration and defects. The levels of housekeeping and deterioration. The external superstructure was found to be
cleanliness was found to be good with levels of hygiene also free of structural defects and had only minor localised spot
seen to be good in the sanitary facilities. The hospital was corrosion, up to approximately 2% of the surface area,
seen to be well equipped and ready for use with drugs and mainly located to the edges of port holes and around weld
controlled substances locked away. The associated drugs log seams. The external superstructure fittings were seen to be
was kept up to date. The accommodation was found to be in a good overall condition with all external accommodation
outfitted to an average quality. The Air Handling Unit (AHU) doors in good working order and properly closing. The Crew
was found to be maintaining a comfortable temperature Welfare was found to be in good overall with it noted that
and was seen to be in good condition with no defects. The the vessel is fitted with a paid to access yet unlimited Wi-Fi
galley equipment was deemed to be in a good overall system and crew were reported to have access to a well-
condition with all equipment reportedly in good working stocked bond store.
order. The galley was found to be in a clean condition with

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 16
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

BRIDGE AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

90
The Bridge and navigation equipment were found generally up-to-date. The vessel is licensed to cover GMDSS
to be in a good to very good condition overall sea areas A1, A2, and A3 and had a valid shore-servicing
with housekeeping found to be good and with all agreement in place. The radio batteries were seen to be well
bridge equipment reported to be fully operational. The maintained and in good condition and the EPIRB, SART and
vessel's was found to be free from any unanticipated alarms VHF handheld batteries were all in date as required. Berth to
with collection instructions posted nearby and with the berth passage plans were seen on-board and were signed by
Bridge Navigation Watch Alarm System (BNWAS) reported to all navigating officers with nautical publications provided in
be fully operational. The vessel's primary means of Electronic format. Master's standing and night orders were
navigation, as listed on form E of the safety equipment found to be signed by all navigating officers with the bridge
certificate is a dual ECDIS system which were found to be up log book correctly filled in and the GMDSS logbook also up
to date. RADAR blind sectors were seen to be posted near to date and correctly filled in. The Monkey island was found
the RADARs with the compass deviation card up-to-date and to be in a good overall condition with the mast, aerials and
available near to the helm. The compass deviation log was antennas seen to be satisfactory and free of defects.
found to be satisfactory, with no major deviations and

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 17
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

ENGINE ROOM AND MACHINERY

60
The Engine room and machinery were found to be including the Bow thruster were in good working order with
in a fair overall condition, primarily due to the no defects reported or sighted. The 4 Auxiliary Engines were
high running hours since last overhaul for reported to be fully operational and were seen to be in
auxiliary engines 2, 3, and 4. with no significant defects good condition, with no major visible defects. A review of
reported or observed and with the engine room generally the latest Auxiliary engines performance report provided
found to be clean. During the inspection the Auxiliary showed some areas of concern as follows: seen to have
Engines, purifiers, pumps, air compressors and sewage been carried out at a low loads, 60%. Auxiliary engines
treatment plant were seen running. Bilges and tank tops running hour data was provided post inspection with high
were generally free of oil or water. Pipework was seen to be running hours noted on engines 2, 3 and 4 since the last
in good overall condition, free of leaks, temporary repairs overhaul. However, no set overhaul intervals were provided.
and significant corrosion with pipework lagging seen to be The vessel's steam boiler was found to be fully operational
all clean and intact. Housekeeping was seen to be to a good but in fair condition with the circulation pump pressure
overall standard with the vessel found to be equipped with gauge found to be damaged. The boiler safety valves were
adequate critical spares as recommended by the ship seen to be satisfactory and free of tampering. All Auxiliary
manager Safety Management System (SMS) which were seen equipment was found to be fully operational and in good
to be neatly stowed and secured. A review of the latest lube condition barring pumps and fresh water generator, which
oil analysis reports provided showed no areas of concern. were in fair condition with gauges for LT fresh water cooling
The Main Engine was reported to be fully operational and pump and fresh water heater unit were found to be
was seen to be in good condition, with no major visible damaged. The steering gear was seen in good working order,
defects. A review of the latest Main Engine performance free of leakage with emergency steering instructions seen to
report provided showed some areas of concern as follows: be posted nearby. The machinery spaces are operated in
seen to have been carried out at a low load, 45%. A review Unmanned mode and the alarm and control system was
of the latest engine running hours showed that the Bearings seen to be free of any serious alarms. Electrical distribution
and Cylinder Liners overhaul schedules are subject to systems including the main switchboard were in good
Condition Based Monitoring (CBM) and therefore no working order and switchboard insulation readings were
dedicated overhaul intervals are provided. Cylinder heads adequate. However an ER air vent blower outlet cover, in
and Pistons running hour data was not provided for review. way of auxiliary engine number 4, was found to be missing.
Propulsion systems, such as shafts, gearing and bearings

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 18
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

Issue: High running hours were noted on auxiliary engines 2, 3 and 4 since the last overhaul. However,
no set overhaul intervals were provided.
$20000 -
Corrective Action: To be further investigated and any required overhauls carried out as soon as $50000
practical.

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: The boiler circulation pump pressure gauge was found to be damaged.

Corrective Action: To be further investigated and rectified as soon as practical. <$1000

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: Gauges for LT fresh water cooling pump and fresh water heater unit were found to be
damaged.
<$1000
Corrective Action: To be further investigated and rectified as soon as practical.

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 19
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

Issue: ER air vent blower outlet cover, in way of auxiliary engine number 4, was found to be missing.

Corrective Action: To be further investigated and rectified as soon as practical. <$1000

Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: Main and auxiliary engine performance reports were seen to all have been carried out at a low
loads.

Corrective Action: Ensure all future engine performance tests are carried out at a minimum load of <$1000
70% as per good marine practice.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 20
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS

80
Fire Fighting Equipment and Systems were found fire main and ancillaries such as hydrants and valves were in
to be in a good condition overall and generally good overall condition, free of defects. Fire extinguishers
free of fire hazards with all firefighting equipment were all in good condition and all portable equipment were
seen to be regularly serviced and inspected. The fire positioned in accordance with the fire plan. Firefighting
detection and alarm system was found to be fully outfits and associated equipment were all in good condition
operational and was free of signs of tampering and alarms. with BA equipment found fully charged and ready for use.
The vessel is fitted with CO2 and Water Spray fixed The emergency generator was tested during the inspection
firefighting in the engine room, CO2 and Water Spray for the and found to be in good working order and in a good
cargo areas and no fittings in the accommodation. Fixed overall condition. Remote shutdown emergency devices
firefighting systems were all reported to be in good working such as quick closing valves, machinery stops and
condition with operating instructions clearly posted. The ventilation dampers were deemed to be in a good overall
main and emergency fire pumps were reportedly fully condition with no defective shut down equipment. The fire
operational and both were found to be in a good condition, doors were found to be in good condition, closing
free of leakages. A fire pump was tested during the effectively and free from any unauthorised 'hold-open'
inspection and was found to deliver adequate pressure. The arrangements.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 21
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

LIFESAVING APPLIANCES

80
Lifesaving appliances were seen to be in a good arrangements were found to be in good condition overall
overall condition with all equipment regularly with evidence of regular maintenance, servicing and
serviced and inspected as required. The vessel is inspection sighted and evident. Ancillary lifesaving
fitted with 1 free-fall lifeboat, which was seen to be in good equipment such as lifejackets, immersion suits and EEBD's
overall condition externally and internally. The lifeboat etc. were found to be in good condition and ready for
engine was tested during the inspection and found to be in immediate use with man overboard smoke and light signals
good working order. The vessel's rescue boat was found to seen to be in date. Embarkation ladders were found to be in
be in a good overall condition and ready for immediate use. a good, well maintained condition and the pyrotechnics and
The vessel is equipped with 5 life rafts, which were found to line throwing apparatus were seen to be appropriately
be in good condition with Hydrostatic Release Units (HRUs) stored and within their expiry dates.
in date and correctly rigged. Davits and lowering

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 22
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

SAFE WORKING ENVIRONMENT

80
Safe working was deemed to be good overall with were seen to be up to date and satisfactory with enclosed
no unsafe practices observed during the space entry procedures followed and an effective Permit To
inspection and the vessel presenting a generally Work (PTW) system in place. Main and emergency exits were
safe working environment. Hazards were seen to be clearly clearly identified and unobstructed with all IMO signage
marked and external walkways adequately coated with non- seen to be satisfactory. Pilot ladders and boarding
slip paint and free of trip hazards. Adequate PPE was seen arrangements were seen to be in a good safe condition with
to be worn by crew at all times and portable gas detection clear pilot boarding instructions posted. Regular drills were
meters were provided and calibrated. Hazardous substances conducted on board with the last drill conducted on the 15-
were seen to be generally safely managed with appropriate Sept-22, which was a Boat and Fire drill.
Material Safety Data Sheets provided. Risk Assessments (RA)

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 23
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

POLLUTION CONTROL

60
Pollution control was deemed to be fair overall, in good condition as observed. The vessel's ballast record
primarily due to the open Condition of Authority. book was seen to be up to date and correctly filled in. The
Pollution control was generally found to be well vessel was not found to be Vessel General Permit (VGP)
implemented on board with the vessel free of pollution compliant, as the vessel had no valid oil-to-water interface
hazards. The vessel holds a Class-approved Inventory of controls such as Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants
Hazardous Materials, which is required for entry into EU (EALs) or an Airseal, with no documentation provided to
ports. The vessel's Oily Water Separator (OWS) was found to verify otherwise. The vessel's sewage treatment plant was
be fully operational and in good overall condition, with no found to be fully operational and in good overall condition,
obvious defects. The OWS was simulation tested during the with no obvious defects. Garbage segregation was found to
inspection and the 15ppm Oil Content Meter (OCM) was be good, with adequate, labelled containers and garbage
seen to be calibrated. The bilge overboard was seen to be seen to be well sorted and containers seen to be made of
sealed and locked against unauthorised opening and the approved non-combustible materials. The Garbage Record
oily water treatment system as a whole was seen to be free Book (GRB) was seen to be well-maintained and up-to-date,
from signs of tampering or unauthorised modification. The with the last entry on the 28-Sept-22. The Emission Control
SOPEP locker was found to be well stocked with SOPEP Area (ECA) change-over logbook was reviewed and found to
equipment in good condition and an accurate list of be satisfactory with the date of last entry on undefined. The
equipment posted nearby. The Oil Record Book (ORB) was vessel's incinerator was found to be fully operational and in
seen to be well-maintained and up-to-date, with the last good overall condition, with no obvious defects. The vessel
entry on the 26-Sept-22. An IMO approved Ballast Water complies with IMO 2020 regulations by employing the use of
Treatment System (BWTS) is fitted but was found not to be Very Low Sulphur Fuels Oils (VLSFO) with a sulphur content
fully operational as the system was yet to be commissioned of less than 0.5%.
for use as per relevant Condition of Authority, though was

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: The vessel does not use Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants (EALs) in the stern tube or has an
airseal and is therefore not VGP compliant in this regard.
$20000 -
Corrective Action: Various upgrades and modifications may be required if the vessel wishes to trade $50000
in the USA.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 24
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: The vessel has one Condition of Authority as follows: The BWMS has not been commissioned at
D-2 due date. Contingency measures according to IMO Circular BWM.2/Circ.62 will be used for
managing non-compliant ballast water discharges, until the installation and commissioning is
completed. Agreement on contingency measures must be obtained from the Coastal State of $1000 -
destination before exercised and arrival of coastal area. Due Date: 06 Dec 2022.
$5000
Corrective Action: The Condition should be thoroughly addressed to Class satisfaction by the due
date.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 25
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

ONBOARD MANAGEMENT

70
Onboard management was found to be fair to up to date with no critical overdue work orders. The Class-
good overall, primarily due to the issues noted approved system-based Planned Maintenance System (PMS)
with the auxiliary engine running hours. The was fully integrated with the SMS for ordering of spares and
computer-based Safety Management System (SMS) was general vessel management. The Port State Control (PSC)
deemed to be functioning and well implemented in general, history was found to be good with 7 deficiencies and 0
with Permits to Work (PTW), risk assessments and detentions in the 5 inspections conducted in the past three
procedures understood and followed. Onboard years. The vessel's flag is not targeted by any Memorandum
management was found to deal with accidents, near misses of Understanding (MoU) or the USCG. Security access
and deficiencies in an effective manner and regular safety controls were deemed to be satisfactory with the vessel
committee meetings were carried out on board. The vessel's conforming to International Ship and Port Security (ISPS)
MLC certificate was valid with records of hours of rest (ILO) standards. The Master and crew were prepared for the
correct and up to date and maximum work hours not inspection and provided good cooperation but with limited
regularly exceeded. The PMS system was found to be kept documents provided.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 26
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

VESSEL CAPABILITIES AND CARGO SYSTEMS

70
Vessel capabilities and cargo systems were corrosion, up to approximately 15% of the surface area,
deemed to be in a fair to good overall condition, mainly located to tops and edges. Hatch coamings were
primarily due to the level of corrosion noted on found to be free of structural defects and had only minor
the hatch covers. No cargo holds could be entered due to localised spot corrosion, up to approximately 5% of the
operational limitations and no photographs of previous surface area, mainly located to edges. Compression
hold entries were provided for review. Inspection reports bars/strips were not applicable due to . Hatch coaming drain
were provided for review. In the absence of photographic channels were free of corrosion, scaling and debris and the
support the condition of the holds is primarily based upon coaming non-return valves were clear and operational.
vessels of a similar age, type and size. The inspected cargo Cargo securing fittings such as container sockets, pad-eyes
hold structural members were reported to be free of damage and D-rings etc. were in good condition. Cargo securing
and had only minor scattered spot corrosion, up to equipment was plentiful with inspection records maintained
approximately 10% of the surface area, mainly located to and securing equipment in good condition as observed.
tanks tops and bulkheads, as well as to cell guides. Cell Stability calculations were seen to be carried out and the
guides were reported to be free of damage and vessel holds a Document of Compliance (DOC) for the
deformation. Cargo hold fittings such as ladders, handrail, carriage of Dangerous Goods (DG). The vessel is equipped to
ventilation ducts, light fixtures and pipe guards etc. were carry 536 Reefer containers whose temperatures were
reported to be generally free of damage and all cargo effectively monitored. Reefer sockets were seen in good
monitoring systems were fully operational. The cargo holds condition with switchboards free of low insulation or earth
were reported to be free of signs of water ingress both from faults. The vessel uses it's own power for all Reefer
internal and external sources. Mechanical ventilation containers, without the need for an additional auxiliary
systems were in good working order. The vessel is fitted power unit. The vessel was reported to have 2,546 TEU
with pontoon hatch covers. Hatch covers were found to be capacity, however limited documentation was provided to
free of structural defects but had moderate scattered spot verify a full breakdown.

NOTABLE ITEMS
Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: Cargo hatch covers were seen to have moderate scattered spot corrosion to the tops.

Corrective Action: Remedial cosmetic maintenance to be carried out as soon as practical. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 27
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example Vessel 0/0000 October 1 2022

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: Scattered areas of corrosion noted to deck plating under cross deck lashing walkways.

Corrective Action: Remedial cosmetic maintenance to be carried out as soon as practical. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF
generated for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 1st October 2022 Page: 28
REPORT SECURITY I.D. ca9e10ac-b575-3afd-841e-2ff7c46d33ea
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

OPERATIONAL DATA

Operational Data Condition

Does the vessel have an Exhaust Gas Cleaning System No
(EGCS)?

Total High Sulphur Fuel Oil (HSFO) capacity: m3

Total Very and Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (VLSFO and
2,677.5 m3
ULSFO) capacity:

Total Marine Gas Oil (MGO) and Diesel Oil (DO) capacity: 147.6 m3

Total Fresh Water capacity: 199.4 m3

Total Ballast Capacity Excluding Cargo Hold Ballast

9,726.2 m3
Capacity:

Total Bilge water capacity: 24.2 m3

Total sludge and residues capacity: 139.8 m3

What fuel type does the vessel run on for the majority
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO)
of the time?

Does the vessel have any energy efficiency No

technologies installed?

Page: 1
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Engines Table

Main
Main Engine Aux Engine Aux Engine Aux Engine Aux Engine
Engine
1 1 2 3 4
2

Hyundai
Designer Heavy N/A Daihatsu Daihatsu Daihatsu Daihatsu
Industries

Model Wartsila 6DK-26e 6DK-26e 6DK-26e 6DK-26e

Mark/Series/Revision AA4,776 DKN626Z DKN626Z DKN626Z DKN626Z

Number of Cylinders 7 6 6 6 6

Speed (RPM) 95 720 720 720 720

Bore (mm) 680 260 260 260 260

Stroke (mm) 2 4 4 4 4

Specific Fuel Oil Consumption (SFOC)

(g/kWhr) At 75% load for ME and 50% load
172.7 198.5 198.5 198.5 198.5
for AEs, corrected to ISO conditions, as
stated on Nox technical files

Nox Tier 2 2 2 2 2

Fuel Oil Consumption at full load

66.8 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
(tonnes/day)

Cylinder Oil Consumption (litres/day) 380

System Oil Consumption (litres/day) 20 30 30 30 30

Page: 2
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Vessel Speed (knots) Consumption (t/day)

Loaded Eco 15 38

Loaded Service 16 42

Ballast Eco 14 34

Ballast Service 17 42

Main Engine Maintenance

Component Condition Based Monitoring? Overhaul Interval

Bearings Yes

Cylinder Liners Yes

Main Engine No.1 Unit Running Hours

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Bearings 48,512 48,512 48,512 48,512 48.512 48,512 48,512

Cylinder Liners 48,512 48,512 48,512 48,512 48,512 48,512 48,512

Class Surveys
Were all Class and Statutory certificates valid? Yes

Is the vessel on the Extended Dry Docking (EDD) No

program?

Is the vessel on the Enhanced Survey Program (ESP)? No

Page: 3
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Does the vessel have an In Water Survey Class Yes

notation?

Is the vessel ice classed? No

Survey Date Last Completed Date Next Due

Main / Special / Renewal 09-Sept-19 21-Oct-24

Intermediate 04-Dec-17 21-Oct-22

Annual 25-Aug-21 21-Oct-22

Bottom In Water 26-Mar-22

Bottom in dry dock 09-Sept-19 21-Oct-24

What was the location of the last out-of-water docking? Example Location

Is the vessels last dry dock report provided and No

attached?

Provide details of works done in last dry dock not provided for review

Does the vessel intend to dry dock before the next No

scheduled bottom survey?

Has the vessel remained with the same flag since No

build?

Please provide details of previous flags Example Flag

Has the vessel remained with the same Class since Yes
build?

Page: 4
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Does the vessel have any Conditions of Class or Yes

Recommendations of Class?

The BWMS has not been commissioned at D-2 due date.

Contingency measures according to IMO Circular BWM.2/Circ.62
will be used for managing non-compliant ballast water discharges,
Please provide further details until the installation and commissioning is completed. Agreement
on contingency measures must be obtained from the Coastal State
of destination before exercised and arrival of coastal area. Due
Date: 06 Dec 2,022.

Does the vessel have any Class Memos, Observations Yes

or Additional Requirements?

Based on the owner request and as a deviation from applicable

DNV Rules, new anchor certified with IACS reference LR: QDO
2,110,150/245 has been installed. Owners confirmed that a
Please provide further details procedure for regular / periodical monitoring for early
identification of product damages, defects and deterioration has
been established. Owners obliged to inform DNV without delay, if
deviations of normal operation of the products are discovered.

The cost for the next out of water bottom survey or dry
docking based on a far eastern shipyard and includes all
800,000
survey and normal maintenance costs is approximately
estimated at:

What was the status of the vessel at the time of

Loading
inspection?

Page: 5
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

HULL

Hull Condition

What sections of the hull were inspected? Port side

Was the vessel free of any major structural damage or Yes

indentations?

Was the vessel free of any minor structural damage or Yes

indentations?

What was the level of Hull coating breakdown and

Minor
corrosion?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to midships boot top and anti-foulings
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

5%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Localised Spot

What was the condition of the hull markings? Partly obscured

What type of anti-fouling coating was applied? Choguku Marine Paint

What level of marine fouling was seen? Minor

Were fenders installed on the hull? No

Page: 6
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What were the vessels draughts?

Fwd: (m) 8.70

Aft: (m) 10.30

Was the upper sections of the rudder visible? No

Page: 7
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

MOORING DECKS

Mooring Decks Condition

Were the decks free of any structural damage or Yes
deformations?

What was the level of coating breakdown and corrosion

Minor
observed on the decks?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to deck plating
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

2%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Scattered Spot

What was the general condition of the deck fittings? Good

Were fairleads and mooring rollers free to move when Yes

tested?

Were all mooring machinery reported to be fully Yes

operational?

What type of windlass(es) and winches were fitted? Electric

What was the condition of the mooring machinery? Good

What amount of band brake lining was seen to be

Minimal, requiring change
remaining?

Please provide further details Windlass band brakes had only minimal thicknesses remaining

Page: 8
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Were clutching and gearing arrangements sufficiently Yes

greased?

What condition were the visible sections of the anchor

Good
chains seen to be in?

What type of mooring lines did the vessel have? Rope

What was the condition of the mooring ropes / wires? Good

Were safe mooring practices observed? i.e. no Yes

overlapping turns on split drum, chafing of lines or
unsafe leading.

Was the last brake test seen to be stencilled on the Yes

mooring winches?

What type of snap back warning signs/zones were

Signs at the entrance to the mooring decks
posted?

Was the Bosun's / Foc'sle store available for Yes

inspection?

What was the condition of the bosun's store structure? Structurally sound with no visible damage

What was the condition of the bosun's store coatings? Coatings fully intact with no corrosion

Was the condition of the bosun's store housekeeping? Fairly neat with some scattered equipment

Were the bitter end release arrangements seen to be Yes

clear and unobstructed?

Was an 'emergency towing booklets/procedures' Yes

available near to the foc'sle?

Page: 9
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

WEATHER DECKS AND FITTINGS

Weather Decks and Fittings Condition

Were the decks free of any structural damage or Yes
deformations?

What was the level of coating breakdown and corrosion

Minor
observed on the decks?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to deck walkways and cross deck areas
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

5%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Scattered Spot

What was the general condition of the deck fittings e.g

Good
handrails, brackets, vent heads, walkways, lighting etc.?

Does the vessel have mooring winches fitted on the No

main deck?

Were deck equipment and pipework free of leakages? Yes

What was the condition of the accommodation ladders

Good
or gangways?

Was the vessel fitted with a provision lifting Yes

appliance(s)?

What was the condition of the provision lifting

Good
appliance(s)?

Does the vessel carry any major spares on external No

decks e.g. propeller blades, anchor etc.

Page: 10
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

BALLAST TANKS AND SYSTEMS

Ballast Tanks and Systems Condition

Were ballast tanks entered? No

Were recent (last 12 months) ballast tank inspection Yes

photographs provided?

Date photos were provided: 22-Sept-22

Were inspection reports or reports of the tanks Yes

condition provided?

Were the tanks free of any structural damage or Yes

indentations?

What was the level of Ballast Tank coating breakdown

Minor
and corrosion?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to edges of supports
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

2%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Localised Spot

Were ballast tanks coatings certified to PSPC Yes

standards?

What was the condition of ballast tank fittings (e.g.

Good
ladders, handrails, pipes & manhole seals)?

Were the ballast tanks fitted with sacrificial anodes? Yes

Anode depletion: 5%

Page: 11
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

How much mud/sediment was seen inside the ballast

Minimal
tanks?

Please provide further details %

Were the tanks seen to be free from any signs of Yes

staining from oil, sewage or marine fouling?

Were ballast tank manhole covers seen to be in good Yes

condition?

Were the remote ballast control systems fully Yes

operational (e.g. valves, gauging etc)?

Were the ballast and/or anti-heeling pumps reported Yes

to be fully operational?

What condition were the ballast and/or anti-heeling

Good
pumps in?

Page: 12
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

ACCOMODATION

Internal Accomodation Condition

Were accommodation spaces used for their assigned Yes
purposes?

What was the condition of the flooring and wall

Good
coverings?

What was the condition of the upholstery and

Good
furniture?

What were the general levels of housekeeping and

Good
cleanliness?

What was the level of hygiene of the sanitary facilities? Good

Was all laundry equipment in good working order? Yes

Was the Hospital well equipped and ready for use? Yes

Were the drugs controlled and substances seen to be Yes

locked away?

Was the associated drugs log kept up to date? Yes

What was the quality of accommodation outfitting? Average quality of outfitting

Did the Air Handling Unit (AHU) maintain a Yes

comfortable temperature?

What was the condition of the AHU? Good

Page: 13
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Galley Condition

What was the level of cleanliness in the Galley? Clean

Was all galley equipment operational? Yes

What was the general condition of galley equipment? Good

Were the insides of Galley hoods clean? Yes

What type of cold provisions stores does the vessel

Walk-in stores / Cold rooms
have?

Were provisions stores well organised with no Yes

provisions stored directly on the deck?

Were provisions stores clean and hygienic? Yes

Were provisions stores at the required temperatures? Yes

Were provision stores temperatures recorded and Yes

records kept nearby?

Were provisions machinery, pipework and door seals Yes

free of frosting and deterioration?

Were lock-in alarms or handles in good working Yes

condition?

External Areas Condition

Was the external Superstructure / Accommodation Yes
Block found to be free from damages?

Were accommodation external doors found to be in Yes

good condition and providing an adequate seal?

Page: 14
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What was the level of external accommodation

Minor
superstructure coating breakdown and corrosion?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to the edges of port holes and around weld seams
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

2%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Localised Spot

What was the general condition of external

Good
superstructure fittings?

Crew Welfare

What is the average contract length for crew members?

Officers: 4 Months

Crew: 6 Months

Was Wi-Fi provided on-board? Yes Paid, Unlimited

Average (Able to access social media apps and

What is the approximate average internet speed?
websites with ease)

Is access provided to catering facilities or food at all Yes

times?

What Public Recreation equipment did the crew have Free Weights Fixed weight machine
access to?
Treadmill Cycling Machine

Swimming Pool Television

Games console Karaoke

Musical Instruments Barbecue

En-suite facilities for all
Public Computer
crew members

Page: 15
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What was the quality of crew recreation facilities? Good

Are crew given time and resources to celebrate Yes

religious or cultural events (i.e. Christmas,
Independence days etc.)?

What facilities were provided in crew cabins? Off Double bed

Sofa Desk

Ample storage

Does the vessel have any onboard training facilities? Yes

Is there a crew suggestion policy in place? Yes

Does the crew have access to a bonded store? Yes, well stocked

Are the crew given additional periods of rest

Yes
throughout the working week (e.g Sunday off)?

Page: 16
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

BRIDGE AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

General Condition
Was all the bridge equipment reported to be fully Yes
operational?

Was the bridge found to be clean and well maintained Yes

with good housekeeping?

Was the view from the bridge clear and unobstructed? Yes

Were all required bridge equipment annual Yes

performance tests (e.g. VDR and AIS) completed in the
last 12 months?

Was the vessel fitted with a Voyage Data Recorder Yes

(VDR)?

Was the VDR seen to be free from any unanticipated Yes

alarms?

Were the VDR collection instructions posted and Yes

known to the Master?

Was the vessels Bridge Navigation and Watch Alarm Yes

System (BNWAS) fully operational, and turned on
when at sea?

Normal time setting at sea 12 mins

Navigation Condition

Primary Secondary

What was the vessels primary & secondary means of

ECDIS ECDIS
navigation as listed on Form E?

Were the primary & secondary means of navigation Yes

found to be up to date?

Was the Echo Sounder fully operational? Yes

Page: 17
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Were the RADARs fully operational? Yes

Were the "blind sectors" posted near to the RADARs? Yes

Does the vessel receive up to date weather Yes

information?

What type of weather updating service does the vessel

Digital subscription
use?

Was an in-date compass deviation card posted near Yes

to the helm?

Was a compass deviation log kept, up to date and free Yes

of any major deviations?

Were azimuth rings (bearing diopters) found to be Yes

available on the bridge?

Communication Condition
What GMDSS sea areas was the vessel licensed to A1 A2 A3 A4
cover?

Were the radio batteries seen to be in good Yes

condition?

Were the EPIRBs, SARTs and Emergency Hand Held Yes

VHF Batteries within their expiry dates?

Was a valid GMDSS shore servicing certificate seen to Yes

be posted near to radio equipment?

Documentation Condition

Were berth to berth passage plans seen on-board? Yes

Were passage plans signed by all navigating officers? Yes

What format were nautical publications provided in? Electronic

Were the Master's standing orders and night orders Yes

found to be signed by all navigating officers?

Page: 18
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Was the bridge log book up to date and correctly filled Yes
in?

Was the GMDSS log book up-to-date and correctly Yes

filled in?

External Condition
Was the Monkey Island found to be in good, well Yes
maintained condition?

Were the main mast, aerials and antennas seen to be Yes

in good condition and free from damage?

Were bridge wing manoeuvring controls fitted? Yes

Were the bridge wing manoeuvring controls reported Yes

to be fully operational and free from signs of water
ingress?

Were bridge wing engine speed and compass Yes

repeaters seen to be in good working condition?

Page: 19
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

ENGINE ROOM AND MACHINERY

General Condition
What equipment was seen running? Auxiliary Engines Purifiers

Pumps Air compressors

Sewage treatment
Auxiliary Boiler
plant
Refrigeration
Compressor

Was the engine room free of any significant defects, Yes

either reported by crew or observed?

What was the general cleanliness of the Engine Room? Clean

Were bilges and tank tops free of oil and water? Yes

Was housekeeping to a good overall standard? Yes

Was the vessel equipped with adequate critical spares Yes

as recommended by the ship manager Safety
Management System (SMS)?

Were spares neatly stowed and correctly secured? Yes

Were all sounding pipe self-closing devices in good Yes

working order and sounding pipes capped?

Were recent copies of lube oil analysis reports Yes

provided for review?

Were any caution (amber) or action (red) alerts seen No

on the lube oil analysis reports?

Was the NOx Technical file kept up to date? Yes

Were Chief Engineer Standing Orders clearly posted Yes

and signed by all engineers?

Were all machinery special tools provided and in good Yes

condition?

Page: 20
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Main Engine Condition

Was the main engine in good working condition? Yes

What condition did the Main Engine appear to be in? Good

Were Main Engine performance reports provided for Yes

review?

Were the performance reports satisfactory? No seen to have been carried out at a low
load, 45%

Was there any overdue maintenance on the Main No

Engine Turbochargers?

Propulsion

What type of propulsion does the vessel have? Fixed Pitch Propeller (FPP)

Were the Propulsion systems, including shafts, Yes

machinery and electric motors, if relevant, in good
working condition?

What type of thruster systems does the vessel have? Bow Thruster

Was the thruster(s) in good working condition? Yes

What condition did the thruster(s) appear to be in? Good

Power Generation

How many Auxiliary Engines does the vessel have? 4

Were the auxiliary engines in good working condition? Yes

Page: 21
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What condition did the Auxiliary Engines appear to be

Good
in?

Were Auxiliary Engines performance reports provided Yes

for review?

Were the performance reports satisfactory? No seen to have been carried out at a low
loads, 60%

Does the vessel have a shaft generator? No

Does the vessel have a shaft motor (Power Take-In)? No

Auxiliary Machinery
Does the vessel have an Auxiliary Boiler? Yes

What type of boiler is fitted? Steam

Was the boiler in good working condition? Yes

What condition did the Boiler appear to be in? Fair

Please provide further details circulation pump pressure gauge found to be damaged

Were boiler safety valves in satisfactory condition? Yes

Page: 22
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Equipment Fully operational? Condition

Purifiers Yes Good

Pumps Yes Fair

Coolers Yes Good

Air Compressors Yes Good

Fresh Water Generator Yes Fair

Filters Yes Good

Fans Yes Good

Refrigeration Systems Yes Good

gauges for LT fresh water cooling pump and fresh water heater unit
Why was 'No', 'Fair' or 'Poor' selected above?
were found to be damaged

Was all engine room pipework free of leakages? Yes

Was all pipework free of temporary repairs? Yes

Was all pipework free of corrosion or soft patches? Yes

What condition was pipework lagging in? Clean

Please provide further details Severely deteriorated and dirty

Was the steering gear in good working condition? Yes

Was the steering gear free of leakages? Yes

Was the emergency steering communication Yes

equipment and gyro repeater working as required?

Page: 23
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Were emergency steering instructions posted nearby? Yes

Was the Engine workshop clean and tidy? Yes

ECR and Electrical

Was the Engine Control Room clean and tidy? Yes

Was the Engine Control and Alarm system free of any Yes
serious alarms?

Does the vessel have an Unmanned Machinery Space Yes

(UMS) notation?

Does the machinery space operate in UMS mode? Yes

Were all Electrical distribution systems in good Yes

working condition?

Were Main Switchboard Insulation readings Yes

adequate?

Were distribution and switchboard panels protected Yes

with approved rubber matting?

Page: 24
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

LIFESAVING APPLIANCES

Lifsaving Appliances Condition

Were all Lifesaving Appliances regularly serviced? Yes

Date of last service: 21-Jan-22

How many lifeboats is the vessel equipped with? 1

What type of lifeboat is the vessel fitted with? Free-fall

What was the external condition of the lifeboat(s)? Good

What was the internal condition of the lifeboat(s)? Good

Were Lifeboat Engines able to be tested? Yes

Were lifeboat engines in good working order? Yes

What was the condition of the rescue boat? Good

How many life rafts does the vessel have? 05

What was the condition of the life rafts? Good

Were Liferaft Hydrostatic Release Units (HRU) in date Yes

and correctly rigged?

Page: 25
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What was the condition of the Davits and lowering

arrangements for the lifeboat(s), rescue boat and Good
liferafts?

What Date is the next Davit wire due for change? 13-Jun-23

Were legible launching/recovery instructions posted Yes

near to survival craft?

Was evidence of regular maintenance, service and Yes

inspection of the launching appliances sighted and
evident?

What was the date of the last abandon ship drill? 15-Sept-22

Were all lifejackets, immersion suits, EEBDs and other Yes

lifesaving ancillary equipment in good condition and
ready for use?

Were Man Overboard Buoy (MOB) smoke and light Yes

signals in date?

Were the embarkation ladders in a good, well Yes

maintained condition?

Were pyrotechnics and line throwing apparatus Yes

available, stored in an appropriate container and
within their expiry dates?

Page: 26
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

SAFE WORKING ENVIRONMENT

Safe Working Environment Condition

Were any unsafe practices observed during the No

inspection?

Did the vessel provide a safe working environment? Yes

Were all hazard markings clear? Yes

Were external walkways adequately coated with anti- Yes

slip paint and free of trip hazards?

Are all hazardous substances including safely Yes

managed and stored with relevant Material Safety
Data Sheets (MSDS)?

Is Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) provided and Yes

worn by crew?

Are 'Enclosed Space Entry' procedures implemented? Yes

Is an effective Permit To Work (PTW) process Yes

implemented?

Date of last PTW: 26-Sept-22

Is an effective Risk Assessment (RA) process in place? Yes

Was evidence of the annual and 5-yearly inspections Yes

of both fixed and portable lifting equipment and
appliances sighted?

Are main and emergency exits clearly identified and Yes

unobstructed?

Are sufficient portable oxygen and gas detection Yes

meters provided and regularly calibrated?

Date of last calibration: 26-Sept-22

Page: 27
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What is the working language of the vessel? English

Are standing orders, procedures, instructions and Yes

manufacturers' manuals written in a language which
can be understood by the crew?

Are all IMO signs correctly placed, and compliant with Yes
IMO requirements?

Does the vessel have an adverse history of accidents No

and near-misses?

Is the vessel equipped with an approved SOLAS Yes

training manual?

Were the pilot ladders and boarding arrangements in Yes

a good, safe condition?

Does the vessel have clear pilot boarding instructions Yes

posted?

Are regular drills conducted on board? Yes

Last drill date 15-Sept-22

Last drill type Boat and Fire

Page: 28
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

POLLUTION CONTROL

General Condition
Was Pollution Control well implemented within the on Yes
board Safety Management System (SMS)?

Is the vessel free of pollution hazards? Yes, with no hazards

Were scuppers plugged in port as required? Yes

Does the vessel have a Class approved Inventory of Yes The vessel holds a Class approved
Hazardous Materials (IHM)? Inventory of Hazardous Material (IHM)

Oil - Marpol Annex I

Is an Oily Water Separator (OWS) fitted? Yes

Was the OWS reportedly operational? Yes

What was the condition of the OWS? Good

Was the OWS Tested? Yes

Means of testing Simulated

Was the 15ppm meter calibrated? Yes

Was the Bilge Overboard valve secured against Yes

unauthorised opening with adequate signage and
warnings posted?

Means of securing Sealed

Locked

Page: 29
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Was the oily water treatment system including valves Yes

and pipework free of any signs of tampering, bypass,
or modifications?

Was the SOPEP locker or box well stocked? Yes

What was the condition of the SOPEP equipment? Good

Was a list of SOPEP equipment posted and accurate? Yes

Was the Oil Record Book (ORB) up to date and Yes

correctly filled in?

Date of last entry 26-Sept-22

Category of last entry D

Were previous bunkering checklists correctly filled Yes

out?

Date of last bunkering 24-Aug-22

Were bunker samples correctly stored? Yes

Does the vessel have a Ballast Water Treatment Yes

System (BWTS) fitted?

Ballast Water Treatment System

Manufacturer: Example Manufacturer

Type: UV

What regulation is listed on the Ballast Water

D-2
Management Certificate?

Type of BWTS approval: IMO approval

Page: 30
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Was the BWTS operational? No system yet to be commissioned as per

relevant Condition of Authority

What was the condition of the BWTS? Good

Was the Ballast Record Book up to date and correctly Yes

filled in?

Date of last entry 22-Sept-22

Is the Vessel General Permit (VGP) compliant? No The vessel does not use Environmentally
Acceptable Lubricants (EALs) in the stern
tube or has an airseal and is therefore
not VGP compliant in this regard

Sewage - Marpol Annex IV

Was a Sewage Treatment Plant fitted? Yes

Was the Sewage Treatment Plant operational? Yes

What was the condition of the Sewage Treatment

Good
Plant?

Does the vessel have a sewage holding tank? Yes

What was the condition of the Sewage Holding Tank? Good

Garbage - Marpol Annex V

Does the vessel have a garbage management plan? Yes

How was the condition of Garbage segregation? Good

Were Garbage containers of approved, non- Yes

combustible type?

Page: 31
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Was the Garbage Record Book (GRB) up to date and Yes

correctly filled in?

Date of last entry 28-Sept-22

Category of last entry B

Air - Marpol Annex VI

Does the vessel have a valid IAPP certificate? Yes

Is the vessel compliant with IMO 2,020 Sulphur cap Yes

regulations?

How does the vessel comply with IMO 2,020 Use of Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oils (VLSFO), MGO, DO
regulations? etc.

Does the vessel use Ozone Depleting Substances No

(ODS) as Refrigerant Gas?

Was an Incinerator fitted? Yes

Was the Incinerator operational? Yes

What was the condition of the Incinerator? Good

Does the vessel have an Emission Control Area (ECA) Yes

change-over log?

EEXI
Does the vessel have an EEDI score assigned at build? No

What fuel type does the vessel run on for the majority
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO)
of the time?

Does the vessel have any energy efficiency No

technologies installed?

Is the vessel ice classed? No

Page: 32
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Main Engine(s)

Specific Fuel Oil Consumption (SFOC) (g/kWhr): 172.7

Auxiliary Engines

Specific Fuel Oil Consumption (SFOC) (g/kWhr): 198.5

Does the vessel have a shaft motor (Power Take-In)? No

What is the expiry date of the International Air

21-Oct-24
Pollution Prevention (IAPP) certificate?

Page: 33
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

ONBOARD MANAGEMENT

Onboard Management Condition

Does the vessel have a functioning Safety Yes
Management System (SMS)?

How was the SMS Implemented? Software / Electronic System

Were the officers familiar with, and allowed easy Yes

access to, the SMS?

Was the SMS well implemented on board, with Yes

Permits to Work, Risk Assessments and Safety
procedures understood and followed?

Is the SMS system regularly reviewed by the Master? Yes

Date of last review 01-Aug-22

Does the vessel management deal with accidents, Yes

near-misses and deficiencies in an effective manner?

Are regular safety committee and management Yes

meetings carried out on board?

Does the vessel have a valid MLC certificate? Yes

Were Hours of Rest (ILO) records correct and up to Yes

date?

Last updated 28-Sept-22

Are hours of maximum permissible work regularly No

exceeded?

Is an effective Planned Maintenance System (PMS) Yes

implemented and kept up to date?

Page: 34
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What type of Planned Maintenance System (PMS) does

Class-approved system
the vessel have?

Name of PMS Cloud Ship Managment

Was the PMS a fully integrated type system? (i.e. has Yes
integration with the SMS, spares ordering and is
accessible by shore side management)

Were there any critical overdue PMS work orders? No

Port State Control (PSC) inspection history

No. of Inspections in Past three years: 5

No. of Deficiencies in Past three years: 7

No. of Detentions in Past three years: 0

Is the vessel flag targeted by Port State Authorities? No

Is an effective system of security access control, Yes

conforming to ISPS standards, in place upon boarding
the vessel?

Type of access control Gangway access.

Do the Master and Chief Engineer have an effective Yes

hand over procedures?

Are random or specific drug and alcohol testing Yes

carried out?

Tests Carried out by Onboard by Master External Company

Were the Master and crew prepared for the Yes

Inspection?

Page: 35
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What level of cooperation was provided by the crew and

Good
Master?

Were documents provided as requested? Limited documents provided

What was the overall impression of the general

Well managed
management of the vessel?

Page: 36
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

VESSEL CAPABILITIES AND CARGO

SYSTEMS - CONTAINERSHIPS

Vessel Capabilities and Cargo Systems - Containerships Condition

Cargo hold Capacity in hold (TEU) Capacity on deck (TEU) Total (TEU)

Cargo Hold No.1 96 174 270

Cargo Hold No.2 202 240 442

Cargo Hold No.3 236 264 500

Cargo Hold No.4 236 288 524

Cargo Hold No.5 214 320 534

Cargo Hold No.6 0

Cargo Hold No.7 0

Cargo Hold No.8 0

Cargo Hold No.9 0

Additional Deck Stowage 0

Total 984 1,286 2,270

How many cargo holds does the vessel have? 5

Page: 37
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Were the cargo holds able to be entered and No operational limitations

inspected?

Were recent vessel cargo hold inspection No

photographs provided?

Date photographs were taken: 04-Aug-22

Were recent inspection reports provided? Yes

Date of inspection reports: 04-Aug-22

Were cargo holds structural members found to be Yes

free from damage (e.g. side plating, tank top and
framing)?

Were the cargo hold fittings such as ladders, hand Yes

rails, and ventilation ducting found to be free from
damage and deterioration?

Were the cell guides free from any significant damage Yes
or significant deformation?

What was the level of coating breakdown and corrosion

Minor
observed in the Cargo Holds?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to tanks tops and bulkheads, as well as to cell guides
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

10%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Scattered Spot

Were all cargo monitoring systems (e.g. bilge alarms, Yes

smoke detection systems etc.) fully operational and
regularly tested?

Were the cargo holds free from signs of significant Yes

water ingress?

Were the cargo holds free from signs of previous Yes

and/or current internal leaks? (e.g. from manholes,
adjacent tanks, pipework and fittings etc.)

Page: 38
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What is the method of cargo hold ventilation? Mechanical

Were cargo hold ventilation systems in good working Yes

order?

Were the cross-deck areas seen to be free from Yes

waving of the deck plates or any signs of torsional
deformation?

Is the fixed firefighting system in cargo spaces in Yes

apparent good condition?

Hatch Covers

What type of hatch covers are fitted? Pontoon

What was the make and model of the Hatch covers?

Make and Model: information not provided

Were the hatch cover found to be free from structural Yes

damage?

What was the level of coating breakdown and corrosion

Moderate
observed on the hatch covers?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to tops and edges
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

15%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Scattered Spot

What was the condition of the hatch cover rubber

N/O
seals/gaskets and retaining channels?

Please provide further details operational limitations

Page: 39
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What was the condition of hatch cover securing

Good
arrangements?

What was the condition of the hatch cover landing

Good
pads?

Hatch Coamings
Were the hatch coamings found to be free from Yes
structural damage?

What was the level of coating breakdown and corrosion

Minor
observed on the hatch coamings?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to edges
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

5%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Localised Spot

Were the compression bars/strips seen to be in good N/A

condition?

Were the hatch coaming drain channels seen to be Yes

free from corrosion, scaling or debris?

Were hatch coaming non-return valves found to be Yes

clear and fully operational?

Cargo Securing

What was the condition of fixed cargo securing fittings,

such as container sockets, pad-eyes, D-rings and fixed Good
stacking cones, etc.?

Was there an up to date Cargo Securing Equipment Yes

inventory?

Were there any shortfalls of cargo securing devices? No

Were cargo securing device inspection records Yes

correctly maintained?

Page: 40
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

What was the condition of Cargo Securing Equipment? Good

Was there an approved Cargo Loading Manual on Yes

board?

Was there an approved stability booklet on board? Yes

Did the vessel use a Class-approved computer based Yes CARGO ASSITANT / II
loading/stability software?

Were previous and current stability calculations seen Yes

to be carried out?

Does the vessel have a Document of Compliance Yes

(DOC) for the carriage of dangerous goods?

Are procedures for safe lashing and securing of Yes

containers being incorporated in the ship's SMS?

Are appropriate securing points being used for cargo Yes

securing?

Reefer Containers
Is the vessel equipped to carry Reefer containers? Yes

Reefer Capacity

On deck 348

In Holds 188

Total 536

What condition were reefer electrical sockets in? Good

Was the reefer switchboard free of any low insulation Yes

or earth faults?

Was the vessel's own electrical supply sufficient for all Yes
reefer containers, without the use of an additional
Power Unit (package generator) ?

Page: 41
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

Is there an effective system for monitoring reefer Yes Automatic remote monitoring
container temperatures?

Page: 42
 Vessel: Ref:
Example Vessel 0/0000

CARGO LIFTING APPLIANCES

Cargo Lifting Appliances Condition

Page: 43