12416
12416
com
https://ebookluna.com/product/ebook-pdf-biology-of-the-
invertebrates-7th-edition/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD EBOOK
https://ebookluna.com/product/original-pdf-molecular-biology-of-the-
gene-7th-edition/
ebookluna.com
https://ebookluna.com/product/ebook-pdf-invertebrates-3rd-edition-by-
richard-c-brusca/
ebookluna.com
https://ebookluna.com/download/essentials-of-biology-2023-ebook-pdf/
ebookluna.com
https://ebookluna.com/product/ebook-pdf-cognitive-neuroscience-the-
biology-of-the-mind-5th-edition/
ebookluna.com
(eBook PDF) Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the
Mind 5th Edition
https://ebookluna.com/product/ebook-pdf-cognitive-neuroscience-the-
biology-of-the-mind-5th-edition-2/
ebookluna.com
https://ebookluna.com/product/life-the-science-of-biology-10th-
edition-ebook-pdf/
ebookluna.com
https://ebookluna.com/product/ebook-pdf-life-the-science-of-biology-
twelfth-edition/
ebookluna.com
https://ebookluna.com/download/progress-in-heterocyclic-chemistry-
ebook-pdf/
ebookluna.com
https://ebookluna.com/product/ebook-pdf-molecular-cell-biology-7th-
edition/
ebookluna.com
Expanded Contents vii
4 7
The Poriferans The Ctenophores 135
and Placozoans 77 Introduction and General Characteristics 135
Phylum Porifera 77 Ctenophore Diversity 141
Introduction 77 Class Tentaculata 142
General Characteristics 79 Class Nuda 144
Poriferan Diversity 84
Class Calcarea 86
Class Demospongiae 86
Class Hexactinellida 87
8
Other Features of Poriferan Biology: Reproduction The Platyhelminths 147
and Development 88 Introduction and General Characteristics 147
Phylum Placozoa 89 Class Turbellaria 149
Introduction 89 Class Cestoda 156
General Characteristics 89 Class Monogenea 158
Class Trematoda 159
The Digeneans 159
Getting to a New Host 167
5 The Aspidogastreans (= Aspidobothreans) 169
Introduction to the
Hydrostatic Skeleton 95 9
The Mesozoans: Possible
Flatworm Relatives 179
6 The Mesozoans 179
Class Orthonectida 180
The Cnidarians 99 Class Rhombozoa 181
Introduction and General
Characteristics 99
Subphylum Medusozoa 102
Class Scyphozoa 102
10
Class Cubozoa 107 The Gnathifera: Rotifers,
Class Hydrozoa 109
Subclass Hydroidolina 109
Acanthocephalans, and
Order Siphonophora 112 Two Smaller Groups 183
The Hydrocorals 114 Introduction 183
An Unusual Group of Likely Medusozoans: Phylum Rotifera 184
the Myxozoa 115 Introduction and General Characteristics 184
A Medusozoan Sister Group? 116 Class Seisonidea 188
Class Staurozoa 116 Class Bdelloidea 191
Subphylum Anthozoa 117 Class Monogononta 191
Subclass Hexacorallia Other Features of Rotifer Biology 194
(= Zoantharia) 120 Digestive System 194
Subclass Octocorallia Nervous and Sensory Systems 195
(= Alcyonaria) 124 Excretion and Water Balance 195
viii Expanded Contents
21 24
The Hemichordates 529 Invertebrate Reproduction
Introduction and General Characteristics 529 and Development—
Class Enteropneusta 530
Class Pterobranchia 534
An Overview 555
Introduction 555
Asexual Reproduction 556
22 Sexual Reproduction 558
Patterns of Sexuality 558
The Xenoturbellids: Gamete Diversity 560
Deuterostomes at Last? 537 Getting the Gametes Together 561
Larval Forms 565
Phylum Xenoturbellida 537
Dispersal as a Component of the Life-History
Pattern 577
xi
xii Preface
memorizing predigested summaries of the primary lit- session; it is always easier to assign additional sections of
erature; they gain much by reading and discussing that a text than to tell students what not to read within a larger
literature. Similarly, I have again decided against adding section. I find that periodic scheduled quizzes, designed
“end-of-chapter summaries,” arguing that students will to reward students for doing the assigned reading, pro-
learn far more of lasting value by writing and discussing vide excellent motivation. The final chapter (Chapter 24)
their own summaries than by memorizing mine. brings together all of the major phyla by considering
The excitement of invertebrate biology is found in the general principles of invertebrate reproduction and devel-
primary research literature, and a major goal of this book opment, providing students an opportunity to reminisce
is to motivate and prepare students to read that literature— about all the animals that they have encountered during
both the recent literature and that of past decades, before the the term and to begin moving beyond phylum-by-phylum
words “synapomorphy” and “Lophotrochozoa” were com- compartmentalization toward synthesis.
mon in the literature, and when most workers still thought This edition has a somewhat greater phylogenetic
that Echiura was a phylum and that myxozoans were mem- orientation than its predecessors, but it still avoids
bers of the Protozoa. The Research Focus Boxes scattered prolonged phylogenetic discussion. There is still no con-
throughout the book are based on individual papers drawn sensus concerning many invertebrate interrelationships:
from the primary literature to illustrate the range of questions Developmental studies, molecular techniques, and cladis-
that biologists have been asking about invertebrates and the tic analyses continue to revolutionize our thinking about
variety of approaches that have been used to address those evolutionary relationships, or at least to challenge many
questions. My goal here is to prepare students to read the treasured assumptions. Annelids and arthropods may or
primary literature by focusing on how questions are formu- may not be closely related, segmentation may be a derived
lated, how data are collected and interpreted, and how each rather than an ancestral character in molluscs, the ances-
study typically leads to further questions. Students inter- tral mollusc may have more closely resembled a bivalve
ested in the topic of a particular Research Focus Box might than a gastropod, nematodes are probably closely related
wish to read the original paper on which that Focus Box was to arthropods than to rotifers, insects may have evolved
based and then use that Focus Box as a model for summariz- from crustacean ancestors, leeches and earthworms may
ing other papers on related topics. For Focus Boxes based be derived polychaetes, and phoronids may be modified
on older research articles, interested students may wish to brachiopods. Similarly, nemertine worms, long consid-
follow the topic forward in time, using an indexing service ered acoelomates, actually may be unusual coelomates
such as the Web of Science. Many instructors now ask their with no direct flatworm affinities. Acoels may be primitive
students to write Research Focus Boxes modeled on the ones but may not belong in the phylum Platyhelminthes.
in this book; such assignments can teach students much of For some workers, even the definition of what it
lasting value, particularly if they include guided revision— means to be a protostome has shifted substantially over
not an onerous chore for either student or instructor since the past few years and now relies less on anatomical and
each Focus Box is only a few pages long. This assignment developmental criteria. Indeed, the usefulness of mor-
allows students to put their growing vocabulary to immedi- phology and ultrastructure in inferring phylogenetic
ate use, and it doesn’t seem to hurt, either, that students feel relationships has been seriously challenged in recent
that they’re learning useful skills in the process. years. “Lophophorates,” for example, appear to be deu-
As further incentive for both instructors and students, terostomes based on morphological and developmental
Bob Podolski at the College of Charleston has created criteria, but group unambiguously with protostomes in
a Research Focus Box (RFB) posting area on the Society most molecular analyses. Similarly, molecular data now
for Integrative and Comparative Biology website (Division align chaetognaths with protostomes, despite their many
of Invertebrate Zoology): http://www.sicb.org/dl/rfb.php. deuterostome developmental characteristics. The rela-
Now students can write for a real audience, not just for tionships between cephalochordates, chordates, and echi-
their instructors. Instructors are encouraged to post their noderms are also uncertain: Some recent molecular data
students’ best RFB’s on the website for others to read. suggest that cephalochordates are more closely related to
As with previous editions, chapters are self-contained echinoderms than to other chordates, implying that some
and can be assigned in whatever order best suits the orga- key chordate features were present in the ancestral deu-
nization of any particular course, once the introductory terostome and later lost in the evolution of echinoderms
chapters have been covered. In my own course, I cover and hemichordates. And molecular analyses, often in
some introductory material (particularly chapters 1 and 5) concert with careful ultrastructural studies, have mostly
and then begin with annelids and other protostomes. destroyed the idea that pseudopodia and flagella inform
Within each chapter, the material has been arranged in us about protozoan relationships.
manageable, readable units for the convenience of both Clearly, invertebrate systematics is a work in progress.
student and instructor. For example, a section entitled Although the phylogenetic atmosphere is charged with
“Introduction and General Characteristics” might be excitement, beginning students typically view textbook
assigned prior to a lecture on a particular group of organ- discussion of such controversies as simply another set of
isms, while a section called “Feeding and Digestion” might facts to be memorized. For this reason, such issues are
best be assigned prior to the accompanying laboratory best treated in lecture, where they can be used to animate
Preface xiii
class discussion. Indeed, the controversies surrounding for some other animals, including the tardigrades; indi-
phylogenetic speculation are what make phylogeny inter- cations of an association with nematodes seems to have
esting, and can be used to make the animals themselves resulted from a long-branch attraction problem which,
interesting. Chapter 2 introduces students to the range once resolved, restores the tardigrades to the neighbor-
of approaches used in reconstructing phylogenies, and hood of arthropods and onychophorans. In addition, the
includes substantial discussion of cladistic analysis and the sponges now include 4 classes rather than 3—the Homo-
promise and potential pitfalls associated with the incorpo- scleromorpha have been moved out of the Demospongiae
ration of molecular data. The book provides the founda- to form a class of their own—Velella and Porpita are no
tion upon which instructors and students can build. longer in separate hydrozoan orders, and the Class Poly-
Whenever possible, I provide “Defining Character- chaeta may no longer be a valid taxonomic category. The
istics” as each new animal group is introduced, to help gnathostomulids have come to settle comfortably as close
students keep track of features separating each group of relatives of rotifers and acanthocephalans within the new
animals from other groups at the same taxonomic level. clade Gnathifera, and the xenoturbellids seem to be deu-
In essence, these defining characteristics are synapomor- terostomes, bringing the total number of extant deutero-
phies. For some groups there are no clear defining char- stome phyla to four.
acteristics, or characteristics that have been proposed are Several chapters have been largely rewritten. In
too controversial to be included at the present time. particular, I have reorganized the material on body cav-
Most chapters conclude with a section entitled ities in Chapter 2 to better emphasize the protostome-
“Search the Web,” guiding students to particularly good deuterostome distinction. I also have updated the section
websites associated with the group under discussion. “Inferring Evolutionary Relationships” in that chapter to
I have listed only those sites that speak with verifiable incorporate more of the modern molecular approaches.
authority and that are likely to be around and updated for In addition, I have updated the biological information
a number of years. about many of the animal groups discussed in this book.
For example, I now discuss recent information about the
Changes for the Seventh Edition role of sexual reproduction in the life cycle of cellular
slime molds in Chapter 3. Moreover, it seems clear that
When I finished the second edition of this book in 1984, the definitive host in the myxozoan life cycle is usually
I thought that it might need to be revised perhaps once or an invertebrate, with vertebrates usually serving as inter-
twice in my lifetime. A series of careful developmental stud- mediate hosts—the opposite of what occurs in the trema-
ies in concert with the increasing acceptance and use of tode life cycle. In Chapter 6, I now draw more attention
cladistic methodology and molecular data in phylogenetic to the Staurozoa, given their possible basal position
analyses have made the past 30 years far more exciting than within the Medusozoa. Throughout the book, I have
I had imagined they would be, and the changes to this edi- updated the General References sections and references
tion are substantial, despite the passage of only 4 years since listed in the “Topics for Further Discussion and Inves-
I completed the previous edition. tigation” sections, and have added new topics to several
Most chapters have been revised to reflect new dis- chapters. I also have updated material in the “Taxonomic
coveries and expanding research areas, including research Detail” sections of many chapters. For example, students
of commercial importance and environmental relevance. now can learn about a remarkable crustacean parasite
Remarkably, all of the rather dramatic organizational that destroys the tongue of its fish host and then takes the
changes that I made for the previous editions have held tongue’s place with its own body.
up, and indeed have generally been bolstered by additional The current edition deals somewhat more conspicu-
evidence. The pogonophorans, echiurans, and sipuncu- ously with biomedical relevance, biological invasions,
lans, for example, for many years treated as 3 separate habitat degradation, and other contemporary issues. I
phyla, are all now widely accepted as modified annelids have written several new Research Focus Boxes, added
based upon morphological, developmental, and molecular new “Topics for Further Discussion and Investigation”
data. Support has also generally increased for separating sections to some chapters, and included many new ref-
protostomes into at least two great groups—the Ecdysozoa erences to the recent primary literature, including many
and the Lophotrochozoa—although there is not yet com- published as recently as 2013. I also have added some won-
plete agreement about exactly which animals each group derful new websites to the Search the Web sections that
contains or how the animals within each group are related close each chapter, and have written one new invertebrate
to each other. riddle. In addition, since learning about invertebrates
This edition contains some impressive new changes. requires students to acquire a substantial new vocabulary,
For example, I now discuss the increasingly likely pos- I have added a new online resource to give students some
sibility that insects have evolved directly from crusta- ideas for including that new vocabulary in their everyday
cean ancestors, and that acoel and nemertodermatid conversation: Talking about Invertebrates (See left side
flatworms may belong in a separate phylum, the Acoe- of web page: http://ase.tufts.edu/biology/labs/pechenik/
lomorpha, which may have little relationship with other publications/); send your entries to me and I’ll post them
flatworms. I have also updated phylogenetic relationships for all to see.
xiv Preface
The paradigm shifts that have occurred over the past Miller, for updates on tardigrade species numbers; and
25 years or so have been truly remarkable, and there is no end Jens Høeg and Gonzalo Giribet, for their helpful com-
in sight. If insects really evolved from crustacean ancestors, ments on the arthropod material.
for example, as recent molecular and morphological studies I would also like to thank the many people who con-
indicate, that will require a substantial redefinition of what tributed their expertise to previous editons of the text:
it means to be a crustacean. Similarly, there is now substan-
tial molecular evidence that oligochaetes and leeches evolved Frank E. Anderson, Southern Illinois University;
from polychaete ancestors, which would essentially make Christopher J. Bayne, Oregon State University; John
the Polychaeta the equivalent of the Annelida, and a study in F. Belshe, Central Missouri State University; Yehuda
2007 using expressed sequence tags has supported the inclu- Benayahu, Tel Aviv University; Bill Biggers, Wilkes
sion of Ectoprocta and Entoprocta within a single phylum, University; Robert Bieri, Antioch University; Chip
the Bryozoa, bringing us back to a classification established Biernbaum, College of Charleston; Brian L. Bingham,
over 100 years ago. Finally, although recent molecular stud- Western Washington University; Susan Bornstein-Forst,
ies using individual molecules continue to add support for Marian College; Kenneth J. Boss, Harvard University;
the Ecdysozoa-Lophotrochozoa dichotomy, as noted earlier, Barbara C. Boyer, Union College; Robert H. Brewer,
a recently reported whole-genome study of nine eukary- Trinity College; Maria Byrne, University of Sydney
otic species does not support that arrangement, but favors C. Bradford Calloway, Harvard University; Ron
instead the older Articulata hypothesis in which arthropods Campbell, University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth;
are more closely related to annelids than to nematodes. John C. Clamp, North Carolina Central University;
As more molecular data from more species and more Clayton B. Cook, Bermuda Biological Station for Research;
genes from each species are collected, we should see John O. Corliss, University of Maryland; Bruce Coull,
increasing stability in the accepted arrangements. There University of South Carolina
is good reason to hope. Ferenc A. deSzalay, Kent State University; Don Diebei,
As always, I welcome constructive criticism from all Memorial University of Newfoundland; Ronald V. Dimock,
readers, both instructors and students. Jr., Wake Forest University; William G. Dyer, Southern
[email protected] Illinois University, Carbondale
David A. Evans, Kalamazoo College
Daphne G. Fautin, University of Kansas; Paul Fell,
Acknowledgments Connecticut College; Ben Foote, Kent State University;
Bernard Fried, Lafayette College; Peter Funch, University
It is a great pleasure to thank the reviewers who have of Århus
helped to make this a better text. Audrey Gabel, Black Hills State University; James R.
Garey, University of South Florida; Ann Grens, Indiana
Douglas Lipka
University, South Bend
William Carey University
Kenneth M. Halanych, Woods Hole Oceanographic In-
John Lugthart stitution; G. Richard Harbison, Woods Hole Oceanographic
Dalton State University Institution; Norman Hecht, Tufts University; Gordon
Hendler, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County;
Joshua Mackie
Anson H. Hines, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center;
San Jose State University
Edward S. Hodgson, Tufts University; Alan R. Holyoak,
Brian Steinmiller Manchester College; Duane Hope, Smithsonian Institution;
Waynesburg University William D. Hummon, Ohio University, Athens
William W. Kirby-Smith, Duke University; Robert E.
Janice Voltzow
Knowlton, George Washington University
University of Scranton
John Lawrence, University of South Florida; William
William Woods Layton, Dartmouth Medical School; Herbert W. Levi,
Tufts University Harvard University; Gail M. Lima, Illinois Wesleyan
University; B. Staffan Lindgren, University of Northern
I am also grateful to Gordon Hendler, for detailed advice British Columbia
on all things echinoderm; Tom Cavalier-Smith and Laura Robert Knowlton, Western Illinois University; James
Katz, for suggestions about how to best arrange the proto- McClintock, University of Alabama at Birmingham;
zoans in Chapter 3; Sally Leys, for detailed comments on Rachel Ann Merz, Swarthmore College; Nancy Milburn,
my revision of Chapter 4; Beth Okamura, for her patience Tufts University
in answering all of my questions about myxozoans; Gary Diane R. Nelson, East Tennessee State University; Claus
Rosenberg, for updates on gastropod species numbers; Nielsen, University of Copenhagen; Michele Nishiguchi,
Christer Erséus and Thorten Struck, for updates on an- New Mexico University -Las Cruces; Jon Norenburg, Smith-
nelid systematics and species numbers; William (Randy) sonian Institution
Preface xv
Steve Palumbi, University of Hawaii; Lloyd Peck, Jon D. Witman, Marine Science Institute–Northeastern
British Antarctic Survey; John F. Pilger, Agnes State University; William Woods, Tufts University; Robert
College; William J. Pohley, Franklin College of Indiana; Woollacott, Harvard University
Gary Polis, Vanderbilt University; Rudolph Prins, Russel L. Zimmer, University of Southern California
Western Kentucky University
Mary Rice, Smithsonian Institute; Robert Robertson, I am also indebted to many other colleagues around
The Academy of Natural Sciences; Pamela Roe, California the world who cheerfully provided their stunning photo-
State University, Stanislaus; Frank Romano, Jacksonville graphs for this and previous editions, answered specific
State University queries in person or by telephone and e-mail, or com-
Amelia H. Scheltema, Woods Hole Oceanographic mented on drafts of new Research Focus Boxes that
Institution; J. Malcolm Shick, University of Maine; Owen I based on their original research papers.
D. V. Sholes, Assumption College; Terry Snell, University I am grateful to all of these people: their devotion to,
of Tampa; Eve C. Southward, Plymouth Marine Labora- enthusiasm for, and knowledge about invertebrate biology
tory (U.K.) is both inspiring and humbling.
John Tibbs, University of Montana, Missoula Finally, I am happy to thank Steve Wainwright for
Steve Vogel, Duke University getting me off to a good start. Chapters 1 and 24 of this
J. Evan Ward, Salisbury State University; Daniel book are based on papers I wrote as an undergraduate for
Wickham, University of California–Bodega Marine his Animal Diversity course at Duke University. Students:
Laboratory; Edward O. Wilson, Harvard University; never throw your schoolwork out; you just never know!
Visit https://testbankfan.com
now to explore a rich
collection of testbank or
solution manual and enjoy
exciting offers!
2013 Guide to the Major Animal Groups
(aschelminth groups are shaded blue)
(P = Platyzoa)
Invertebrates Animalia Protostomia Spiralia Lophotrochozoa Panarthropoda Ecdysozoa Cycloneuralia Deuterostomia
Protozoan
Protists
Porifera
Placozoa
Cnidaria
Ctenophora P
Gastrotricha P
Rotifera P
Acanthocephala P
Gnathostomulida P
Platyhelminthes P
Mesozoa P
Nemertinea
Mollusca
Sipuncula
Annelida
Bryozoa
Brachiopoda
Phoronida
Entoprocta
Cycliophora
Arthropoda
Tardigrada
Onychophora
Nematoda
Nematomorpha
Kinorhyncha
Priapulida
Loricifera
Chaetognatha
Echinodermata
Hemichordata
Chordata
Xenoturbellida
The Geologic Time Scale (MYA)
(major global extinctions are shaded blue)
Estimated
% of genera
Eons Eras Periods Epochs going extinct*
Quaternary Holocene
Pleistocene MYA
1.6
Pliocene
5
Miocene
Cenozoic
24
Tertiary Oligocene
37
Eocene
58
MYA Paleocene
66 47% ± 4%
Cretaceous
Mesozoic
190
Jurassic
205 53% ± 4%
Triassic
Phanerozoic
250 82% ± 4%
Permian
290
Pennsylvanian
(Late Carboniferous)
325
Mississippian
Paleozoic
(Early Carboniferous)
355
57% ± 3%
Devonian
410
Silurian
438 60% ± 4%
Ordovician
510
Cambrian
544
Precambrian
*Based on Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1996. In: O. H. Walliser, ed. Global Events and Event Stratigraphy.
Springer: Berlin, pp. 35–51.
MYA = Millions of years ago
This page intentionally left blank
1
Introduction and Environmental
Considerations
Introduction: The Importance
of Research on Invertebrates
“We need invertebrates, but they don’t need us.”
E. O. Wilson. 1987. The little things that run the
world (the importance and conservation of
invertebrates).
Conservation Biology 1:344–346
understanding of the genetic basis for evolutionary shifts This book, together with lectures and laboratory
in morphology and life history, including the possible role sessions, opens the door to the great and growing litera-
of horizontal gene transfer, in which sets of genes may be ture of invertebrate biology.
transferred intact from one species to another, and the
role that such transfer may play in evolution. Certain in- Environmental Considerations
vertebrate species recently have become key models for
understanding the evolution of the vertebrate brain. The organisms considered in this book are grouped into
In addition, modern research on invertebrates is more than 30 phyla. The members of almost half of these
helping to unravel the story of how immune recognition phyla are entirely marine, and the members of the remain-
systems evolved and how they work. Interest in certain ing phyla are found primarily in marine and, to a lesser
invertebrates as biological agents for controlling various extent, freshwater habitats. Excluding the arthropods,
agricultural pests and as sources of unique chemicals of invertebrates generally have been far less successful in in-
potential biomedical and commercial importance also is vading terrestrial environments. Even those invertebrate
increasing. Some of the substances isolated from marine species that are terrestrial as adults often have aquatic
sponges, for example, promise to be potent antitumor developmental stages. It is worthwhile, therefore, to con-
agents, and others isolated from certain spiders and ven- sider some of the physical properties of water—both fresh
omous snails are providing neurobiologists with highly and salt—to discover why so many species are aquatic for
specific chemical probes for studying key aspects of all or part of their lives. The physical properties of salt
nerve and muscle function, such as how ion channels are water, freshwater, and air play major roles in determining
opened and closed. Still other substances derived from the structural, physiological, and behavioral characteris-
invertebrates show considerable promise as instant ad- tics displayed by animals living in various habitats.
hesives (glues produced by onychophorans and barnacles
and by some spider and bivalve species, for example) and Air Is Dry, Water Is Wet
anticorrosion agents (e.g., barnacle cements). Detailed
studies of crustacean and insect navigation and locomo- Air is dry, whereas water is wet. As trivial as this statement
tion, and how that locomotion is controlled and coordi- may seem, the repercussions with respect to morphology,
nated, may lead to the design of new robots, both flying respiratory physiology, nitrogen metabolism, and repro-
and crawling, macro and micro; studies on the optical ductive biology are tremendous, as seen in Table 1.1.
properties of certain sponge fibers may lead to the manu- Because aquatic organisms are in no danger of dry-
facture of more effective fiber optic cables; and detailed ing out, gas exchange can be accomplished across the
studies of how echinoderms form their remarkable cal- general body surface. Thus, the body walls of aquatic in-
cite crystals may have similarly sophisticated engineering vertebrates are generally thin and water permeable, and
applications. any specialized respiratory structures that exist may be
Invertebrates also have become widely used to evalu- external and in direct contact with the surrounding me-
ate and monitor pollutant stress in aquatic environments, dium. Gills, which can be structurally quite complex, are
and the rapid loss of invertebrate species from both terres- simply vascularized extensions of the outer body wall.
trial and aquatic habitats is gaining increasing attention in These extensions increase the surface area available for
biodiversity studies. gas exchange and, if they are especially thin walled, may
The recently documented phenomenon Colony also increase the efficiency of respiration (measured as
Collapse Disorder, in which hundreds of thousands of the volume of gas exchanged per unit time per unit area).
honeybees simply abandon their hives and disappear, is In contrast to the minimal complexity required for
worrisome: apples, almonds, and approximately 90 other aquatic respiratory systems, terrestrial organisms must cope
crops in the United States depend on honeybees for pollina- with potential desiccation (dehydration). Terrestrial species
tion, accounting for some $15 billion in annual sales. Bum- relying on simple diffusion of gases through unspecialized
blebees, which pollinate some 15% of commercial crops in body surfaces must have some means of maintaining a
the U.S., are also in serious decline. Similarly ominous is moist outer body surface, as by the secretion of mucus in
the recently documented increase in the acidity of seawater earthworms. Truly terrestrial invertebrates generally have a
in the world’s oceans, as discussed in the next section. water-impermeable outer body covering that prevents rapid
Finally, there is a growing concern about the increased dehydration. Gas exchange in such species must be accom-
spread of various invertebrate species into nonnative habi- plished through specialized, internal respiratory structures.
tats, and increasing attention is being paid to the mecha- The union of sperm and egg, and the subsequent de-
nisms of transport and to the ecological impact of such velopment of a zygote, can be achieved far more simply by
biological invasions. Of course, nobody yet knows the aquatic invertebrates than by terrestrial species. Marine
consequences of continued pollution, biological invasions, organisms, in particular, may shed sperm and eggs freely
and global climate change on food web function, in either into the environment. Because the gametes, embryos, and
aquatic or terrestrial food-webs; probably there is only larvae of marine species are not subject to dehydration
one way to do the experiment, and we’re all participating. or to osmotic stress, fertilization and development can
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
Why, then, without doubt
It was Vivien! But yet do you know
‘Tis the Eve of Saint John, and here, last night,
I dreamed that I saw my dream again!
The Marquise
Ah!
The Marquise
De Vardes
You shudder!
The Marquise
De Vardes
No!
‘Twas an air from the Forest of Paimpont
Came over me!
De L’Orient
The Marquise
Ah—h—h!
Yvette
Oh!—
[She sits in the great chair and waves the fan slowly
to and fro.
Enter Grégoire.
Yvette
Peace, peace!
Grégoire
Yvette
A fan.
So long I’ve wanted one!
Grégoire
A fan, forsooth!
You cannot eat a fan, drink it, wear it!
Yvette
Grégoire
The price
Would keep a peasant from starvation!
And belike it fell from the lifted hand
Of Madame la Marquise de Blanchefôret!
Thou evil-starred!
Yvette
Grégoire
Diantre!
Now you will be beaten as well as hanged!
Yvette
Enter De Vardes.
Séraphine
Grégoire
Monseigneur?
De Vardes
Grégoire
Monseigneur?
Séraphine
Grégoire
Séraphine
No, faith!
Yvette
It was so beautiful,
The fan—I took it in my hand—it broke!
Séraphine
Yvette
Oh, monseigneur!
Last Eve of Saint John, by the Druid Stone!
De Vardes
Ah!—
[He takes the fan from Yvette’s hand and examines it.
Yvette
I tremble not!
Enter Lalain.
Yvette
I care not, I!
De Vardes
Ah,
Rémond Lalain!
Lalain (stiffly)
Monsieur—
De Vardes
A moment, pray,
Until I’ve spoken with these worthy folk!
Lalain (coldly)
Yvette! Yvette!
Yvette
Lalain
Yvette
I know.
Lalain
Yvette
I know.
De Vardes (to Séraphine)
Séraphine (stammering)
De Vardes
The pullet?
Yvette
Lalain
Séraphine
De Vardes
Lisette?
Yvette
Lalain
Séraphine
Yvette
She followed me
Through the green lanes, and o’er the meadows salt.
Her breath was sweet as May!
De Vardes
Yvette
Oh, monseigneur!
Monseigneur, I’m the herd girl of Morbec!
Lalain (aside)
What is
Thy name?
Yvette
Yvette.
Séraphine
De Vardes
Séraphine (nodding)
Just so.
Lalain (aside)
Recall
Just one of a great seigneur’s privileges!
Baiser des mariées, in short, my friend!
Séraphine
O holy Saints! the night that she was born!
The thunder pealed, the sea gave forth a cry,
The forked lightnings played, the winds were out
And in the hut her mother lay and wailed,
And called on all the saints, the while Jehan
(That was her mother’s husband, monseigneur),
He stood and struck his heel against the logs.
Up flew the sparks, for all the wood was drift,
Salt with the sea, and every flame was blue.
I held the babe—Yvette, show monseigneur
The mark beneath the ear!
Yvette
No!
Séraphine
Stubbornness!
‘Tis there!
Lalain
De Vardes
Ah!
Séraphine
Ay! a little mark.—Jehan Charruel!
He was a violent man,—the sea breeds such!
He cursed Yvonne upon her pallet there,
So pale she was, and dying with the tide!
He cursed the saints, the purple mark, the babe,
And some one else I dare not name—
Lalain
I dare!
Henri-Etienne-Amaury de Vardes,
Late Baron of Morbec!
Séraphine
Then out he goes,
A-weeping hard—Jehan—into the night.
Ouf! how it blew!—
The sea ran high, he met it in the dark,
Was drowned! Yvonne went with the ebb. Behold
Yvette!
De Vardes
Yvette
De Vardes
Yvette
Monseigneur!
De Vardes
Yvette
De Vardes
Yvette
De Vardes
Yvette
De Vardes
De Vardes
Ah—
Yvette
The summer fled, the light, the warmth did go,
The winter came that was so cruel cold,
Cold as the dead! And hunger, monseigneur,
With bread at the château!—Died Baron Henri.—
The summer came again, the roses bloomed,
The roses bloomed, but they were not for us!
For us the dank seaweed, the thorny furze.
The lark sang well, but ah, it sang too high!
We could not lift our hearts to heaven’s gate;
We only heard the wind moan at our door.
We cried to the saints, but they took no heed!
One told us what they did at Goy and Vannes,
At Goy and Vannes, pardieu! they helped themselves!
We heard there had come a new lord to Morbec,
A soldier and a stranger to us all!
Three days have gone since I did sit alone
Upon the cliff edge in the waving grass;
The mew and curlew cried, the night wind blew,
And in the sunset glow red turned Morbec!
I thought of my mother, I thought of France,
I looked at the château cruel and high,
And as I was hungry I ate my black bread!—
I think, monseigneur, that I am nineteen.
De Vardes
Pauvre petite!
Yvette
De Vardes
How dark
Thine eyes!
Yvette
De Vardes
Yvette
De Vardes
Yvette
Monseigneur?
De Vardes
Pauvre petite!
Yvette
O Our Lady!
The roses smell so sweet—
Lalain
I pardon crave,
But I must sup to-night at Rennes. Please you,
Release this peasant girl! Affairs there are
Of which I’d speak—
De Vardes
Ay, presently!
Lalain
Now!
De Vardes
Monsieur!
Lalain
De Vardes
Monsieur
The Baron of Morbec!
De Vardes (bowing)
Monsieur
The Deputy for Vannes!
De L’Orient (sings)
The Marquise
Monsieur le Baron,
My lost fan!
Yvette (aside)
Oh me!
De Vardes
Madame la Marquise,
I will give you a fan that’s to my taste;
By Watteau painted, mounted by Laudet,
Fragile and fine, an Adonis of fans!
This that I broke I will keep for myself.
Yvette
Ah!
Ah—h—h!
Lalain (aside)
Gods!
If I forgive!
The Marquise
At Blanchefôret, monsieur,
The Watteau, Laudet, Adonis of fans,
I’ll take from your hand—
De Vardes
The Marquise
Come soon,
My garden is sweetest in June.
De L’Orient (sings)
Lalain
Yvette
So generous
He was!
Lalain
Yvette (passionately)
Lalain
Yvette
Oh!
Lalain
So quick to forget—
Yvette
Oh!
Lalain
La patrie—
Sworn oaths—the tricolour—
Yvette
Anger me not!
Lalain
Yvette
‘Tis false!
Lalain
Yvette
Lalain
You gaze at that man! I tell you he wooes
Madame la Marquise de Blanchefôret!
Madame!
I broke the fan! I would pay if I might.
I would keep your cows, or spin your flax—
The Marquise
The fan!
You broke the fan—not monsieur there!
Yvette
No, I!
The Marquise
Sainte Geneviève!
Séraphine
Yvette!
Count Louis
La belle Marquise!
[Séraphine draws Yvette back to the base of the
statue. Count Louis, The Marquise, and the
guests talk together. Lalain crosses to De Vardes.
Lalain
René de Vardes!
De Vardes
Rémond Lalain!
Lalain
De Vardes
So!
Lalain
De Vardes
I doubt it not.
Lalain
De Vardes
At last the heart of the matter! I see
You have been through the Forest of Paimpont.
Lalain
De Vardes
Monsieur!
Lalain
Oh, if
You lay your hand upon your sword, monsieur,
I’m for you there!
De Vardes
Lalain
De Vardes
Indeed!
Sergeant!
The Sergeant
My Colonel!
De Vardes
The Sergeant
Séraphine
O Saint Thégonnec!
Saint Guirec! Saint Servan!
Yvette
O Our Lady!
The Abbé
Yvette
Oh!—
Mme. de Vaucourt
The Egyptian!
Séraphine
Mlle. de Château-Gui
Séraphine
Ah, mademoiselle, it is
The innocentest creature!
Good-morning,
My dear!
Count Louis
Hm—m—m!—pretty!
The Vidame
Count Louis
Lalain
Diable!
The Sergeant
My Colonel,
I have them safely here! Ha! you within!
Mme. de Vaucourt
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookluna.com