2021, Talaat M., Co2+in Cu Fe2 O4
2021, Talaat M., Co2+in Cu Fe2 O4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-020-00556-z
RESEARCH
Received: 2 May 2020 / Revised: 24 November 2020 / Accepted: 10 December 2020 / Published online: 14 January 2021
# Australian Ceramic Society 2021
Abstract
Nanoparticles of undoped and cobalt-doped copper ferrite Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0) were successfully
synthesized by a co-precipitation method. The influence of Co2+ substitutions on the structure, morphological, optical, and
magnetic properties of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 nanoferrites was studied. The crystallite size found by XRD increased from ∼ 10 to∼
25 nm. The lattice parameter increased from 8.332 to 8.371 Å with increasing the Co2+ content. The FTIR spectra of Cu1-
−1
xCoxFe2O4 display two strong absorption bands in the range of 400–200 cm . The band gap energy of nanoferrites is found to
2+
decrease from 3.65 to 3.20 eV with an increase in the content of Co ions. It has been observed that the luminescence intensity
decreases in copper ferrite matrices with an increase in the ratio of Co2+. The results show the magnetic properties of copper
ferrite are significantly affected by the doping amount of Co2+ ions. The saturation magnetization increases with increasing cobalt
ion concentration as indicated in the M-H loops.
although the magnetic moment and ionic radius of Cu2+ are technique. Nevertheless, there is no comprehensive study
different from Co2+ ions [20, 21]. The introduction of Co in done on the optical and magnetic properties of Cu 1-
CuFe2O4 can produce distorted spinel structures depending xCoxFe2 O 4 nanoferrites. In our present work, Co doped
upon the concentration of the precursor solutions. Since the copper ferrite nanoparticles with composition.
magnetic properties and ionic radius of Cu2+ (3d9) are differ- Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0) have been
ent from Co2+ (3d7), some improvements in the magnetic and synthesized using precipitation method. The influence of co-
structural properties of mixed ferrites were anticipated upon balt ion substitution on the structural, magnetic, and optical
substitution of Co in CuFe2O4. The magnetic properties of properties of copper ferrite nanoparticles has been explored.
copper ferrite nanoparticles should be improved due to high
anisotropy (Ka = 3 × 105 J m−3), a high saturation magnetiza-
tion, and coercivity of CoFe2O4 ferrite [21]. Experimental
Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles are considered a
good candidate for potential applications such as pharma- Materials and methods
ceutical drug delivery and microwave, switching, and
memory devices [22, 23]. Many techniques [6, 23–28] Nanoferrites having the general formula Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 (x =
were used to prepare the mixed copper-cobalt ferrites. 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0) were synthesized by precipitation
Such techniques include the microwave-assisted sol–gel technique [48]. Figure 1 shows the synthesis scheme for nano-
[29], co-precipitation [24, 27], sol–gel [22, 23], ceramic particles production. Preferred stoichiometric percentage
[26], microemulsion [28], and soft chemistry methods quantities of high purity cobalt sulfate monohydrate, CoSO4
[30]. Co-precipitation was preferred among all of these 7H2O; copper sulfate pentahydrate CuSO4.5H2O; and ferrous
methods. The co-precipitation method showed to be the ammonium sulfate hexahydrate, (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2.6H2O were
most effective appropriate system for Cu-Co nanoferrites subsequently dissolved in 25 mL of deionized water. The
preparation [31]. Compared to other approaches, it offers reaction mixtures were stirred vigorously and continuously
many advantages such as better distribution of the constit- for 60 min using magnetic stirring. Twenty millimoles of
uents in the resulting ferrites, low operating temperature, oxalic acid dissolved in an equal extent of deionized water
low cost, and good control of stoichiometry [27, 32]. and dropwise introduced to metal salts answer beneath mag-
Several studies [22, 24, 33] recorded high levels of substi- netic stirring for 60 min. The collected precipitates are washed
tution, where a rise in Cu content in CoFe2O4 resulted in a a number of times followed by drying at 373 K in an oven.
reduction in the magnetization. For example, Jnaneshwara The dried precipitates are milled to powdered form using mor-
et al. [22] prepared Co1-xCuxFe2O4 by using the solution tar and pestle. The crushed powder is sintered at 500 °C for 3 h
combustion process and stated that the magnetization re- in muffle furnace to form the nanostructure of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4.
duced from 38.5 to 26.7 emug−1 as the concentration of
Cu2+ increased. On the other hand, Balavijayalakshmi Characterization
et al. [24] prepared Co1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles with a
coprecipitation method followed by sintering at 900 °C, The UV-vis absorption spectroscopy (Hewlett Packard 8453)
while Samavati et al. [33] obtained the same material by was employed for the determination of optical absorption
using the method at 800 °C. Their findings showed that the properties and band gap energy. Photoluminescent properties
saturation magnetization (M s) decreased from 72.06 to of nanoferrites were examined using a spectrofluorometer
21.11 emug−1 when concentrations of copper increased, Perkin-Elmer LS 50B at a wavelength range of 240–
although a little work done on Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 ferrites is 700 cm−1, with excitation wavelength at 400 nm. The mor-
reported in literature. Tailhades et al. [34] prepared Cu1- phological studies of prepared nanoparticles were investigated
xCoxFe2O4 spinel ferrites from oxalate precursors were in- via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by a Tecnai
vestigated by different techniques to link the coercivity F300. X-ray diffractometer XDS 2000, Scintac Inc., USA
with structure. However, Imran et al. prepared Cu 1- equipped with CuKα radiation of wavelength (λ =
xCoxFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles by sol–gel process [35], 1.5406 Å) was used to characterize the crystal structure. The
and he found the obtained samples are spinel cubic struc- mean particle sizes of these samples were calculated using
ture with particle size varied from 14.8 to 34.0 nm. Their Scherrer formula from the line width of the most intense and
findings showed that with increased cobalt content, the well-resolved diffraction peaks. FT-IR (Frontier (Perkin
saturation magnetization (M s ) and coercivity (H c ) in- Elmer)) spectrophotometer in frequency range of 400–
creased. In our previous studies, we documented [36] the 200 cm−1 was used for the chemical analysis to confirm the
impact of zinc substituted on the structural, morphological, chemical bonds present in the sample. A Superconductive
optical, and magnetic properties of copper ferrite nanopar- Quantum Interferometer System (SQUID) Quantum Model
ticles organized with the aid of co-precipitation chemical MPMS XL-7 magnetometer in RSO mode was used for
J Aust Ceram Soc (2021) 57:543–553 545
Slow Addion
Precipitate formaon
(Cu1-xCoxFe2O4)
FTIR XRD
Powder
TEM SQUID
Lattice constant (Ǻ) ± 0.002 8.332 8.339 8.346 8.352 8.363 8.371
Particle size (nm) ± 0.01 10 13.5 16.7 18.5 21 25
546 J Aust Ceram Soc (2021) 57:543–553
(311)
(440)
(511)
(220)
(400)
(422)
x = 0.0 x=0.0
x = 0.2 x=0.2
Transmittance %
Intensity (a.u.)
x = 0.4 x=0.4
x=0.6
x = 0.6
x=0.8
x = 0.8 x=1.0
x =1.0
Fig. 2 XRD analysis of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 nanoferrites Fig. 4 FT-IR spectra of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 (x = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and
1.0) nanoferrites
24 8.37
Morphology and histograms of the Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 (x = 0, 0.2,
22
0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1) nanoferrite are shown in Figs. 5 and 6.
8.36 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Cu-Co sam-
Particle size (nm)
20
ples (Fig. 5a–f) show that all samples exhibit as spherical shaped
18 particles in agglomeration. Figure 5a shows the existence of pure
8.35
CuFe2O4 nanoparticles, and Fig. 5b–f displays the images of
a (Å )
16
the Co-doped CuFe2O4 nanoparticles, but having ag-
14 8.34 glomeration to some extent, due to the relative higher
12
annealing temperature and interaction between magnetic
8.33
particles. The agglomeration is due to the Van der
10 Waals force between the particles [45]. Figure 6a–f rep-
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 resents the histograms of the samples and their average
Cobalt content (x) particle size ranging from 10 to 27.8 nm for Co-doped
Fig. 3 Variation of particle size and Lattice parameter as a function of Co CuFe2O4 samples. The sizes agree well with sizes of
content crystallite obtained from XRD data.
J Aust Ceram Soc (2021) 57:543–553 547
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis 8. The optical band gap energy (Eg) for prepared nanoferrites
which was calculated from the extrapolation of linear part of
Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy is an analytical Tauc’s relation is given [46] as:
instrument used to determine the sample composition. The 1=2
elemental evaluation of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 nanoferrites had been A h v−Eg
h υ¼ ð3Þ
confirmed by energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) evaluation, and α
therefore, the results are seen in Fig. 7a,f. The EDX spectrum
where α, h, ν, Eg, and A are the absorption coefficient,
just indicated the existence of iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), copper
Plank’s constant, light frequency, band gap, and propor-
(Cu), and oxygen (O), which proves the high purity of the
tionality constant, respectively. For the estimation of Eg
synthesized powders. EDX results were in an excellent match
for direct electronic transition in Cu 1 - x Co x Fe 2 O 4
with XRD data.
nanoferrites, (αhν)2 is plotted as a function of energy
(hν) in Fig. 9. The calculated values of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4
UV-vis absorption studies
band gap energies were 3.65, 3.55, 3.51, 3.48, 3.42, and
3.2 eV, respectively (Fig. 9). It clearly shows that there
The UV-vis optical spectra of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 nanoferrites re-
is a decrease in the band gap of the Co-doped CuFe2O4
corded in the wavelength range 240–700 nm are shown in Fig.
548 J Aust Ceram Soc (2021) 57:543–553
c d
e f
samples compared to the pure CuFe2O4. The UV-vis and green emissions at 505, 506, 507, 508, 510, and
absorption spectrum reveals an excessive red shift in 512 nm respectively. The first peak is the blue emission,
band gap with increasing concentration of cobalt, which due to the radiative defects associated with the interface
is due to quantum size effects. It is noticed here that the traps existing at the grain boundaries [50, 51]. The second
band gap values were obtained considerably as the par- peak is assigned to the green emissions. The oxygen va-
ticle size increases. Dhiwahar et al. [47], Wang et al. cancies can be attributed to the green emission [52]. The
[48], and Chen et al. [49] observed the same effect. green emission peak is generally referred to as deep or
trap-state emission and single-ionized vacancy of oxygen
Photoluminescence studies [53]. This behavior can be due to the existence of new
electronic levels between the conductive band and the
Figure 10 displays the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of valence band, which may be due to increased intrinsic
Cu1- xCoxFe2O4 samples recorded at room temperature. defects. The emission characteristics in copper ferrites
The excitation was recorded at a wavelength 400 nm. are therefore regulated by the processes, which are influ-
The present study indicates two peaks corresponding to enced by defects. It is also found that Co doping in copper
blue emissions at 455, 456, 458, 460, 462, and 463 nm ferrite matrices increases the strength of the luminescence
J Aust Ceram Soc (2021) 57:543–553 549
a b
c d
e f
Fig. 7 EDX spectrum of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 a x = 0.0, b x = 0.2, c x = 0.4, d x = 0.6, e x = 0.8, and f x = 1.0
600
x= 0.0
x= 0.2 x=1.0
x= 0.4 x=0.8
500
x= 0.6 x=0.6
x= 0.8 x=0.4
Absorption (a.u.)
x=1.0 x=0.2
PL intensity
400
x=0.0
300
200
100
240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600
Wavelength (nm)
observe that the Ms increases from 35.5 to 54.6 emug−1 as x resulting in an overall increasing in the magnetic moment of
increases from 0 to 1.0 (see Fig. 12). The magnetization var- the Co2+ ion doping samples [57]. Similar results for doped
iation with Co content is very well in agreement with the one copper ferrite were also reported recently [35]. It is evident
reported by Amran et al. [35] on Cu-Co ferrite prepared by from the results presented in Table 2 that the coercivity (Hc)
sol-gel method. The increase in Ms with Co2+ content can be significantly decreased from 1344 to 760 Oe for the samples
clarified by the possible replacement of Cu2+ by Co2+ at the CuFe2O4 and CoFe2O4, respectively (see Fig. 12). The de-
tetrahedral sites of the spinel ferrite lattice. These found trends crease in coercivity with rise in cobalt concentration may be
in the variant of Ms can be justified by means of Neel’s two due to a decrease in anisotropy field, which in turn decreases
sub-lattice magnetization model [28, 55, 56]. This model is energy of the domain wall. This, in turn, is answerable for the
based on, magnetization (in μB) is given by means of M excessive magneto-crystalline anisotropy of cobalt ferrite, in
(μB) = MB − MA, where MA and MB are the net magnetic which the coercivity is associated with the anisotropy constant
moments of A (tetrahedral) and B (octahedral) sites, respec- via the relation Hc = 2 K/μoMs [28]. The excessive magnetic
tively. The increase in the saturation magnetization was due to anisotropy of Co2+ ions increases the anisotropy constant of
that the magnetic moment of Co2+ (3 μB) is higher than Cu2+ Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 nanoferrites [58, 59]. Amran et al. [35] report-
(1 μB). Therefore, the magnetic moment in the B-sub lattice ed that the coercivity will increases with increasing the doping
was sequentially increased with an increase in cobalt doping concentration of Co2+. However, Briceño et al. [60] have re-
ported opposite trends, which are agreed with our present
observation. It can be therefore be inferred that there is some
link between the magnetic properties and the Cu1-xCoxFe2O4
system’s structural performance. Co doping increases the lat-
tice parameter from 8.332 to 8.371 Å, resulting in the expan-
sion of the unit cell volume and increases the inter-atomic
distances among the divalent and trivalent ions, affecting the
magnetic properties successively. By using the following re-
lationship to calculate the magnetic moment of each formula
in Bohr magnetron units (μB) ηB of the experimental value
[61] and is represented in Table 2.
M Ms
ηB ¼ ð4Þ
5585
where the molecular weight is denoted by “M” and saturation
magnetization by “Ms.” The increase in ηB values resulting
from the strength of the super-exchange interactions among
Fig. 9 Energy gap spectra of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 nanoferrite
the various sites led to an increase in the ηB values. In our case,
J Aust Ceram Soc (2021) 57:543–553 551
70 1400
Table 2 The values of magnetic parameters, Ms, Mr, Hc, Mr/Ms, and ηB
of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 nanoparticles at x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.0 65
1300
X Saturation Remanent Coercivity Mr/ Magnetic 60
magnetization magnetization Hc (Oe) Ms moment ηB 1200
Coercivity (Oe)
Ms (emu/g) Mr (emu/g) (μB) 55
Ms(emu/g)
0 35.5 20.3 1344 0.57 1.52 50 1100
26
60 x=0.0
Remanent magnetization (emu/g)
x=0.2 25
x=0.4
40
Magnetisation Ms(emu/g)
x=0.6
24
x=0.8
20 x=1.0
23
0
22
-20
-40
21
-60 20
-30000 -20000 -10000 0 10000 20000 30000 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
H (Oe) Cobalt content x)
Fig. 11 Magnetic hysteresis loops of Cu1-xCoxFe2O4 (x = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, Fig. 13 Remanent magnetization versus cobalt content x in Cu1-
0.6, and 0.8) system xCoxFe2O4
552 J Aust Ceram Soc (2021) 57:543–553
outcomes for the obtained modification and tunable magnetic 21. Hashim, M., Shirsath, S.E.: Meena, Study of structural and mag-
netic properties of (Co–Cu)Fe2O4/PANI composites. Mater. Chem.
properties of the synthesized nanoparticles may be recom-
Phys. 141, 406–415 (2013)
mended for future applications. 22. Jnaneshwara, D.M., Avadhani, D.N., Daruka Prasad, B.,
Nagabhushana, H., Nagabhushana, B.M., Sharma, S.C.,
Prashantha, S.C., Shivakumara, C.: Spectrochim. Acta, Part A.
132, 256–262 (2014)
23. Bammannavar, B.K., Naik, L.R., Pujar, R.B.: Prog. Electromagnet.
References Res. Lett. 4, 121–129 (2008)
24. Balavijayalakshmi, J., Suriyanarayanan, N., Jayaprakash, R.,
1. Rodrigues, A.R.O., et al.: Magnetoliposomes based on manganese Gopalakrishnan, V.: Phys. Procedia. 49, 49–57 (2013)
ferrite nanoparticles as nanocarriers for antitumor drugs. RSC Adv. 25. Hashim, M., Alimuddin, S.K., Koo, B.H., Shirsath, S.E.,
6(21), 17302–17313 (2016) Mohammed, E.M., Shah, J., Kotnala, R.K., Choi, H.K., Chung,
2. Gupta, A.K., et al., Recent advances on surface engineering. Future H., Kumar, R.: J. Alloys Compd. 518, 11–18 (2012)
Midicine. 2, 2 (2007) 26. Sanpo, N., Wang, J., Berndt, C.C., Nano, J.: Res. 22, 95–106
3. Mohseni, H., et al.: Magnetic and structural studies of the Mn- (2013)
doped Mg–Zn ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by the glycine ni- 27. Balavijayalakshmi, J., Suriyanarayanan, N., Jayapraksah, R.:
trate process. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324, 3741–3747 (2012) Mater. Lett. 81, 52–54 (2012)
4. Somvanshi, S.B., et al.: Hydrophobic to hydrophilic surface trans- 28. Singh, C., Bansal, S., Kumar, V., Tikoo, K.B., Singhal, S.: RSC
formation of nano-scale zinc ferrite via oleic acid coating: magnetic Adv. 5, 39052–39061 (2015)
hyperthermia study towards biomedical applications. Ceram. Int. 29. Azam, A., Alloys, J.: Compd. 540, 145–153 (2012)
46, 7642–7653 (2020) 30. Carole Villette, A.R., Tailhades, P., Solid State, J.: Chem. 117, 64–
5. Mohapatra, J., et al., Surface controlled synthesis of MFe2O 4 (M= 72 (1995)
Mn, Fe, Co, Ni and Zn) nanoparticles and their magnetic charac- 31. R. L. Fomekong, University catholic of Louvain Belgium/
teristics. Cryst. Eng. Commun., 15 (2013) 524–532 University of Yaounde I Cameroon, Doctorate/PhD thesis, (2016)
6. Patade, S.R., et al.: Preparation and characterizations of magnetic 32. Lontio, R., Kenfack, P., Magnin, D., Hermans, S., Delcorte, A.,
nanofluid of zinc ferrite for hyperthermia application. Nano Energy. Lambi, J., Solid State, J.: Chem. 230, 381–389 (2015)
9, 1–7 (2020) 33. Samavati, A., Mustafa, M.K., Ismail, A.F., Othman, M.H.D.:
7. Kale, S.B., et al.: Enhancement in surface area and magnetization of Mater. Express. 6, 473–482 (2016)
CoFe2O4 nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery application. In: 34. Tailhades, P., Villette, C., Rousset, A., Kulkarni, G.U., Kannan,
AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC (2018) K.R.: J. Solid State Chem. 141, 56–63 (1998)
8. Somvanshi, S.B., et al.: Investigations of structural, magnetic and 35. Ahmad, I., Abbas, T., Islam, M.U., Maqsood, A.: Ceram. Int. 39,
induction heating properties of surface functionalized zinc ferrite 6735–6741 (2013)
nanoparticles for hyperthermia applications. In: AIP Conference 36. Hammad, T.M., Salem, J.K., Amsha, A.A., Hejazy, N.K.: Optical
Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC (2019) and magnetic characterizations of zinc substituted copper ferrite
9. Somvanshi, S.B., et al.: Influential diamagnetic magnesium (Mg2+) synthesized by a co-precipitation chemical method. J. Alloys
ion substitution in nano-spinel zinc ferrite (ZnFe2O4): thermal, Compd. 741, 123–130 (2018)
structural, spectral, optical and physisorption analysis. Ceram. Int. 37. Kambale, R.C., Shaikh, P.A., Harale, N.S., Bilur, V.A., Kolekar,
46, 8640–8650 (2020) Y.D., Bhosale, C.H., Rajpure, K.Y.: Structural and magnetic prop-
10. Bharati, V., et al.: Influence of trivalent Al–Cr co-substitution on erties of Co1-xMnxFe2O4 spinel ferrites synthesized by combustion
the structural, morphological and Mössbauer properties of nickel route. J. Alloys Compd. 490, 568–571 (2010)
ferrite nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 821, 153501 (2020) 38. Hammad, T.M., Salem, J.K., Harrison, R.G.: The influence of an-
11. Manikandan, A., Judith Vijaya, J., John Kennedy, L.: Phys. E. 49, nealing temperature on the structure, morphologies and optical
117–123 (2013) properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Superlattice. Microst. 47, 335–
12. Maruthamani, D., Vadivel, S., Kumaravel, M., Saravanakumar, B., 340 (2010)
Bappi, P., Sankar Dhar, S., Habibi-Yangjeh, A., Manikandan, A., 39. Pan, W., Gu, F., Qi, K., Liu, Q., Wang, J.: Effect of Zn substitution
Ramadoss, G.: J. Colloid Interface Sci. 498, 449–459 (2017) on morphology and magnetic properties of CuFe2O4 nanofibers. J.
13. Asiri, S., Sertkol, M., Guner, S., Gungunes, H., Batoo, K.M., Saleh, Mater. Chem. Phys. 134, 1097 (2012)
T.A., Sozeri, H., Almessiere, M.A., Manikandan, A., Baykal, A.: 40. Kalai Selvan, R., Augustin, C.O., John Berchmans, L., Saraswathi,
Ceram. Int. 44, 5751–5759 (2018) R.: Combustion synthesis of CuFe2O4. Mater. Res. Bull. 38, 41
14. Mathubala, G., Manikandan, A., Arul Antony, S., Ramar, P.: (2003)
Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 8, 375–381 (2016) 41. Tan, X., Li, G., Zhao, Y., Hu, C.: The effect of Cu content on the
15. W. Bayoumi, J. Mater. Sci., 2007, 42, 8254–8261. 18 N. M. Deraz structure of Ni1−xCuxFe2O4 spinels. Mater. Res. Bull. 44, 2160
and A. Alari, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 94 (2012) 41–47 (2009)
16. Silambarasu, A., Manikandan, A., Balakrishman, K., Supercond, J.: 42. Kaiser, M.: Effect of nickel substitutions on some properties of cu–
Novel Magn. 30, 2631–2640 (2017) Zn ferrites. J. Alloys Compd. 468, 15 (2009)
17. Ravichandran, A.T., Srinivas, J., Karthick, R., Manikandan, A., 43. Murthy, S.R., Citra, S.S., Reddy, K.V., Sobanadri, J.: Indian J. Pure
Baykal, A.: Ceram. Int. 44, 13247–13252 (2018) Appl. Phys. 16, 79 (1978)
18. Rajmohan, S., Jeseentharani, V., Manikandan, A., Pragasam, J.: 44. Mazen, S.A., Abdallah, M.H., Sabrah, B.A., Hashem, H.A.M.: The
Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 8, 393–398 (2016) effect of titanium on some physical properties of CuFe2O4. Phys.
19. Schmitz-Antoniak, C., et al.: Electric in-plane polarization in Status Solidi A. 134, 263 (1992)
multiferroic CoFe2O4/BaTiO3 nanocomposite tuned by magnetic 45. Maaz, K., et al.: Synthesis and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite
fields. Nat. Commun. 4, 2051 (2013) (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles prepared by wet chemical route. J. Magn.
20. Mathew, D.S.: Juang, An overview of the structure and magnetism Magn. Mater. 308, 289–295 (2007)
of spinel ferrite nanoparticles and their synthesis in microemulsions. 46. Azam, A., Jawad, A., Ahmed, A.S., Chaman, M., Naqvi, A.H.:
Chem. Eng. J. 129, 51–65 (2007) Structural, optical and transport properties of Al3+ doped BiFeO3
J Aust Ceram Soc (2021) 57:543–553 553
nanopowder synthesized by solution combustion method. J. Alloys MnFe2O4 particles/sheets/flakes-like nanostructures. Ceram. Int.
Compd. 509, 2909 (2011) 41, 15–26 (2015)
47. Tony Dhiwahar, A., Sundararajan, M., Sakthivel, P., Dash, C.S., 55. Manikandan, A., Judith Vijaya, J., John Kennedy, L., Bououdina,
Yuvaraj, S.: Microwave-assisted combustion synthesis of pure and M.: Structural, optical and magnetic properties of Zn1-xCuxFe2O4
zinc-doped copper ferrite nanoparticles: structural, morphological, nanoparticles prepared by microwave combustion method. J. Mol.
optical, vibrational, and magnetic behavior. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. Struct. 1035, 332–340 (2013)
138, 109257 (2020) 56. Bhasker, S.U., Reddy, M.V.R., Sol-Gel Sci, J.: Technol. 73, 396–
48. Wang, Y.S., Thomas, P.J., Brien, P.: Optical properties of ZnO 402 (2015)
nanocrystals doped with Cd, mg, Mn, and Fe ions. J. Phys. 57. Bhukal, S., Namgyal, T., Mor, S., Bansal, S., Singhal, S.: J. Mol.
Chem. B. 110, 21412 (2006) Struct. 1012, 162–167 (2012)
49. Chen, Z.C., Zhuge, L.J., Wu, X.M., Meng, Y.D.: Initial study on 58. Baldi, G., Bonacchi, D., Innocenti, C., Lorenzi, G., Sangregorio, C.:
the structure and optical properties of Zn1−xFexO films. Thin Solid J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 311, 10–16 (2007)
Films. 515, 5462–5465 (2007) 59. Ammar, S., Helfen, A., Jouini, N., Fiévet, F., Rosenman, I., Villain,
50. Zang, C.H., Zhang, D.M., Tang, C.J., Fang, S.J., Zong, Z.J., Yang, F., Molinie, P., Danot, M.: J. Mater. Chem. 111, 86–192 (2001)
Y.X., Zhao, C.H., Zhang, Y.S.: Optical properties of a ZnO/P nano-
60. Briceño, S., Del Castillo, H., Sagredo, V., Bramer-Escamilla, W.,
structure fabricated by a chemical vapor deposition method. J. Phys.
Silva, P.: Appl. Surf. Sci. 263, 100–103 (2012)
Chem. C113, 18527 (2009)
61. Moradmard, H., Farjami Shayesteh, S., Tohidi, P., Abbas, Z.,
51. Zhuge, L.J., Wu, X.M., Wu, Z.F., Yang, X.M., Chen, X.M., Chen,
Khaleghi, M.: The variation of magnetic properties of nickel ferrite
Q.: Structure and deep ultraviolet emission of Co-doped ZnO films
by annealing. J. Alloys Compd. 650, 116–122 (2015)
with Co3O4 nano-clusters. J. Mater. Chem. Phys. 120, 480 (2010)
52. Bhargava, R., Sharma, P.K., Dutta, R.K., Kumar, S., Pandey, A.C., 62. Gopalan, E.V., Joy, P.A., Al-omari, I.A., Kumar, D.S., Yoshida, Y.,
Kumar, N.: Influence of Co-doping on the thermal, structural, and Anantharaman, M.R.: On the structural, magnetic and electrical
optical properties of sol–gel derived ZnO nanoparticles. J. Mater. properties of sol-gel derived nanosized cobalt ferrite. J. Alloys
Chem. Phys. 120, 393 (2010) Compd. 485, 711–717 (2009)
53. Anh, L.N., Loan, T.T., Duong, N.P., Soontaranon, S., Viet Nga, 63. Ayyappan, S., Mahadevan, S., Chandramohan, P., Srinivasan,
T.T., Hien, T.D.: Influence of Y and La substitution on particle size, M.P., Philip, J., Raj, B.: Influence of Co2+ ion concentration on
structural and magnetic properties of nanosized nickel ferrite pre- the size, magnetic properties, and purity of CoFe2O4 spinel ferrite
pared by using citrate precursor method. J. Alloys Compd. 647, 419 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C114, 6334–6341 (2010)
(2015)
54. Judith Vijaya, J., Sekaran, G., Bououdin, M.: Effect of Cu2+ doping Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdic-
on structural , morphological, optical and magnetic properties of tional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.