(4th) Additional Handout
(4th) Additional Handout
Understanding nationalism as a notion has always been difficult. Its definition varies in complexity
among scholars striving to convey its development, relevance, and evolution. The true challenge,
however, is determining how to make the underlying concept of this applicable to the traditional majority
as well as the Filipino identity itself. To begin with, according to Anderson (2003), nation is an imagined
political community and imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign. It is imagined because
members of even the smallest nation may never know, meet, or even hear most of their fellow members,
but the idea of their relationship lives on in each of their thoughts. However, it is limited since even the
largest of them, encompassing maybe a billion living human beings, has finite, if elastic, borders beyond
which other nations were. The notion is thus considered to be sovereign since it was born during a period
when the Enlightenment and Revolution were eroding the legitimacy of the divinely ordained, hierarchal
dynastic world. Finally, it is an imagined community because the nation is always viewed as a deep,
horizontal solidarity, whatever the actual inequality and exploitation that may exist in each. He added
that nationalism is not the awakening of nations to self-consciousness: it invents nations where they do
not exist. Hence, this ‘invention’ can only materialize when group of people finally realized they share
common feelings and history. Thus, this definition by Agoncillo (1977) is used—Nationalism is a
feeling developed in a people living within a contiguous geographic area, a sentiment forged by a
common history, language and literature, customs, and traditions and even by a common religion.
To put it simply, a nation is a group of people who share a language, history, culture, and (typically)
geographic region. A state, on the other hand, is a group of people distinguished by formal institutions
of government, such as laws, permanent territorial boundaries, and sovereignty (political independence).
(Brittanica) Therefore a fusion of both is what we call as nation-states today. However, this concept of
nation and nationalism existed in the Philippines prior to the arrival of conquerors. According to Salah
Jubair (1999), the Moro nation was born centuries before the Filipinos in the north. Thus the Moro Wars
were the indicator of the Moro people's nationalistic feelings demonstrated against the Spaniards.
Though it only reasserted its identity after the arrival of the Americans, it clearly exhibited national
identity and the establishment of Bangsa (Malay word means nation). Hence the beginnings of the
Bangsamoro that we know today has long existed either as a social construct or as a political entity.
On the other hand, it took about 300 years for converted Filipinos to develop their nationalistic
views and ideals. It was during the nineteenth century Philippines' fundamental transformations that
caused Filipinos to develop a feeling of national consciousness, which ultimately transformed Philippine
history.
Social Stratification
The Philippine society felt the impact of the developing economy. As a result, social
relations underwent redefinitions and the changing dynamics brought about a renegotiation of
social stratification. With the growing relevance of the mestizo population, new lines were drawn
with the following social strata.
Peninsulares Pure-blooded Spaniards born in the Iberian Peninsula (Spain)
As the Spaniards lost economic power in the nineteenth century, they asserted dominance
by virtue of their race. This issue brought complications with the rising principalia and mestizo
populations who realized their indispensable position in society as movers and facilitators of the
economy. The renegotiation continued throughout the century as the mestizos and principalia
elite eventually demanded social recognition that the pure-blooded Spaniards had consistently
denied them.
These wealthy mestizos and members of the principalia continued to amass economic and
cultural capital. They also availed themselves of the opportunity to obtain higher degrees of
education not only in the Philippines but also in Europe. These activities augmented their
relevance in society as it was from these ranks that articulation of nationalism would emergence.
Political Strata
April 9, 1942- the Fall of Bataan and the start of the “Death March”
Death March- from April 9-17, 1942, more than 70,000 USAFFE (United States Arm Forces of the Far
East ) soldiers forced to walk for more than 100 kilometers from Bataan-Tarlac and killing more or less
20,000 soldiers due to act of brutalities of the Japanese Imperial Army. This was considered as one of
the major atrocities in mankind’s history.
Masaharu Homma- Japanese Commander in the Philippines. He was executed because of his war crimes
on 1946.
Comfort Women- sex slaves of the Japanese soldiers during the World War II.
HUKBALAHAP- Hukbo ng Bayan Laban sa Hapon is a guerilla group that fought against the Japanese
from 1942-1945
October 20, 1944- Douglas McArthur returned to the Philippines
August 6 and 9, 1945- Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki forced Japan to surrender
September 2, 1945- official liberation of the Philippines from Japan
Philippine Presidents
1. Emilio Aguinaldo (1869-1964-)- January 1899- April 1901
Notable Facts:
First and last president of the 1st Republic under the Malolos Constitution of 1899.
Youngest president at age 28
Fought during the 1896 Revolution and Filipino-American War
David, P. A. (1975). Technical choice innovation and economic growth: essays on American
and British experience in the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press.
De Viana, A.V. et al. (2011). Jose Rizal:
Social Reformer and Patriot. Rex
Bookstore. De Viana, A.V. (2011). The
Philippines: A Story of a Nation. Rex
Bookstore.
Drezner, D. W., & Wolf, M. (2005). Why Globalization Works. International Journal,
60(2), 586. doi:10.2307/40204315 Obias, R.W. et al. (2018). The Life and Works of
Jose Rizal. C&E Publishing, Inc.
Pudney, J. (1969). Suez; De Lesseps' Canal. Praeger.
Tan, A. S. (1986). The Chinese mestizos and the formation of the Filipino nationality. Archipel,
32(1), 141-162.
John Schumacher, A New Approach. Philippine Studies, Vol 48, No.4 (4th Quarter 2000) Ateneo
de Manila University Press
Floro Quiboyen, Rizal and Filipino Nationalism: Critical Issues, Philippine Studies, Vol 50. N.o.2
(2nd Quarter 2002), pp. 193-229. Ateneo de Manila University Press
Agoncillo, Teodoro. History of the Filipino People. Eight Edition. Quezon City, C and E
Publishing, 1990 (pp. 184-185)
Anderson, Benedict. 2003. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread
of Nationalism. Pasig: Anvil Publishing, Inc.