TOPIC 5-Monopolistic Competition (A)
TOPIC 5-Monopolistic Competition (A)
Topic 4: Monopolistic
Competition (A)
(Market Structure 1)
Mr. Chizonde, B.
Department of Economics
University of Zambia
©2017
Outline
• 1. Introduction to Market
Structures
• 2. Product differentiation
• 3. Approaches to Preferences
• 4. Equilibrium solutions
1. Introduction to Market Structures
• There are basically Four (4) Main market
structures. These are:
• (a) Perfect Competition
• (b) Pure Monopoly
• (c) Monopolistic Competition
• (d) Oligopoly
• Let us consider their main characteristics.
1. Introduction to Market Structures
• A: Perfect Competition
• Many sellers of homogenous product
• Price-taking behavior and Free-entry and exit
• Key Concept: Efficiency
• Example: Chicken producer in Zambia
• B: Pure Monopoly
• A single seller of unique product
• Price-making behavior and no-entry or exit
• Example: Electricity supply in Zambia
• Key concept: Price discrimination
1. Introduction to Market Structures
• C: Monopolistic competition
• A lot of sellers of differentiable product
• Strategic behavior and easy entry and exit
• Key concepts: Product differentiation and
advertisement
• Example: Phone producers in the world
• D: Oligopoly
• Few large sellers of homogenous product
• Strategic behavior and entry is hard
• Key concept: Advertisement
• Example: Telecommunications in Zambia
(Market Structure 1)
Monopolistic Competition
2. Product differentiation
• 1. What is product differentiation?
• There are two types of product differentiation:
• (a) Products are horizontally differentiated if
consumers have heterogeneous (different)
preferences regarding which product is the best.
• This is termed preference based differentiation.
• It occurs when products are close substitutes and
prices are almost identical.
• Example: Coke and Pepsi
2. Product differentiation
• (b) Products are vertically differentiated if
consumers unanimously agree on which
product is preferred.
• If all products had the same prices, consumers
would all purchase the same product.
• They agree on a quality index and this type of
product differentiation is quality based.
• Example: Phones (High grade and low grade)
3. Approaches to Preferences
• There are two common approaches to modeling
consumer preferences when products are horizontally
differentiated:
• (a) Address approach: Assumes that consumers have
preferences over the characteristics of products (You
buy cause you like its characteristics)
• (b) Goods approach: Assumes that consumers have
preferences over goods and tastes for variety. (You buy
because you like the characteristics or because you just
want to change)
3. Approaches to Preferences
• Monopolistic competition uses the goods approach to
modeling preferences over horizontally differentiated
products.
• This approach assumes the following:
• (a) A large set of differentiable products over which
preferences are defined (products are imperfect
substitutes)
• (b) Preferences are symmetric (products are close
substitutes)
• (c) Preferences can be aggregated and represented by a
single ‘representative consumer’
• (d) Technology is characterized by economies of scale.
4. Equilibrium solutions
• The Demand Curve
• The firm’s demand curve is highly elastic, but
not perfectly elastic.
• It is more elastic than the monopoly’s demand
curve because the seller has many rivals
producing close substitutes; it is less elastic
than pure competition, because the seller’s
product is differentiated from its rivals.
4. Equilibrium solutions
• Maximization Condition (short-run)
• The MR = MC rule will give the firms the profit –
maximizing output. The price they charge would
be on the demand curve.
• In the long run, the situation will tend to be
breaking even for firms. Firms can enter the
industry easily and will if the existing firms are
making an economic profit.
• If the demand shifts below the break-even point,
some firms will leave the industry in the long run.
4. Equilibrium solutions
• Long-run Equilibrium
• Therefore, most monopolistic competitive firms
should experience break-even in the long run
theoretically.
• In reality, some firms experience profit as they
are able to distinguish themselves from the
others and build a loyal customer base.
• Some firms experience loses in long run but may
continue the business as they are still earning
normal profit.
4. Equilibrium solutions
• Social Outcomes
Pmc MC mc
AC mc AC pc