The Juridical Act A Study of The Theoretical Concept of An Act That Aims To Create New Legal Facts H. D. S. Van Der Kaaij
The Juridical Act A Study of The Theoretical Concept of An Act That Aims To Create New Legal Facts H. D. S. Van Der Kaaij
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-juridical-act-a-study-
of-the-theoretical-concept-of-an-act-that-aims-to-create-
new-legal-facts-h-d-s-van-der-kaaij/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD EBOOK
https://textbookfull.com/product/international-and-comparative-legal-
study-on-big-data-bart-van-der-sloot/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-college-panda-s-act-math-1st-
edition-nielson-phu/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/incapacity-to-act-of-natural-persons-
contemporary-challenges-stoyan-stavru/
textbookfull.com
Putin s Wars The Rise of Russia s New Imperialism 3rd
Edition Marcel H Van Herpen
https://textbookfull.com/product/putin-s-wars-the-rise-of-russia-s-
new-imperialism-3rd-edition-marcel-h-van-herpen/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/see-sooner-act-faster-how-vigilant-
leaders-thrive-in-an-era-of-digital-turbulence-george-s-day/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/travel-as-a-political-act-rick-
steves/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/terrorism-in-the-classroom-security-
surveillance-and-a-public-duty-to-act-imran-awan/
textbookfull.com
Law and Philosophy Library 129
The
Juridical
Act
A Study of the Theoretical Concept of an
Act that aims to create new Legal Facts
Law and Philosophy Library
Volume 129
Series editors
Francisco J. Laporta, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain
Frederick Schauer, University of Virginia, USA
Torben Spaak, Stockholm University, Sweden
Editorial Board
Aulis Aarnio, Secretary General of the Tampere Club, Tampere, Finland
Humberto Ávila, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Zenon Bankowski, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Paolo Comanducci, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
Hugh Corder, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
David Dyzenhaus, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Ernesto Garzón Valdés, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
Riccaro Guastini, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
Ho Hock Lai, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
John Kleinig, City University of New York, New York City, USA
Claudio Michelon, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Patricia Mindus, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Yasutomo Morigiwa, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan
Giovanni Battista Ratti, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
Wojchiech Sadurski, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Horacio Spector, University of San Diego, San Diego, USA
Michel Troper, Paris Nanterre University, Nanterre, France
Carl Wellman, Washington University, St. Louis, USA
The Law and Philosophy Library, which has been in existence since 1985, aims to
publish cutting edge works in the philosophy of law, and has a special history of
publishing books that focus on legal reasoning and argumentation, including those
that may involve somewhat formal methodologies. The series has published
numerous important books on law and logic, law and artificial intelligence, law and
language, and law and rhetoric. While continuing to stress these areas, the series has
more recently expanded to include books on the intersection between law and the
Continental philosophical tradition, consistent with the traditional openness of the
series to books in the Continental jurisprudential tradition. The series is proud of the
geographic diversity of its authors, and many have come from Latin America, Spain,
Italy, the Netherlands, Germany, and Eastern Europe, as well, more obviously for an
English-language series, from the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia and
Canada.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
For Jasper
Contents
vii
viii Contents
1.1 Introduction
It is generally accepted that within Western legal systems there needs to be a pos-
sibility to perform an act which has the purpose of changing the set of legal facts.
Not only can an act have that purpose, but also, because it has that purpose, the act
can change the set of legal facts. Some examples of this type of act are: the possibil-
ity for an agent to intentionally enter into a contract, to make a statutory law, to
transfer ownership of his property, to grant a licence, or to start a limited liability
company. It is this group of acts that are the focus of this work.
The possibility to intentionally create legal consequences is deeply rooted in the
Western legal tradition.1 In most civil law systems, these acts by a (legal) person are
classified as ‘juridical acts’. In Germany, although it is restricted to private law, the
concept of the ‘Rechtsgeschäft’ is used.2 In France, the concept of the ‘acte juridique’
is hardly codified, but it plays a role in legal private law discourse.3 In the Netherlands
the ‘rechtshandeling’ is codified and deemed to be present in both private and
administrative law.4 Some countries have not codified the juridical act at all, even
though the concept plays a role in legal doctrine. This is the case, for example, in
Italy, where the ‘negozio giuridico’ is a central concept in legal doctrine.5 In com-
mon law systems, like England, the concept of a juridical act as such is not used or
accepted, but juridical acts can be compared to the ‘exercise of a Hohfeldian p ower’6
1
The western legal tradition includes but is not limited to continental Europe, the Nordic countries,
Latin-America and the Anglo-American legal systems.
2
See e.g.: Flume (1979), pp. 1–363; von Savigny (1840), pp. 1–7, 98–306.
3
See e.g. Lokin (2004), pp. 63–83.
4
Title 3.2 Dutch Civil Code and art. 1:3 of the General Administrative Law Act.
5
Schmidt (2012).
6
Halpin (1996), pp. 129–152.
or Harts ‘acts-in-the-law’.7 The English term ‘juridical act’8 is used in the Principles,
Definitions and Model Rules of European Law, the Draft Common Frame of
Reference, where the act is defined in DCFR art. II. – 1:101(2). This article reads:
‘A juridical act is any statement, whether express or implied from conduct, which is
intended to have legal effect as such.’9 If the term ‘juridical act’ is used in the DCFR
it is limited to the concept as it can be found in the DCFR. For the general readabil-
ity, it is necessary to use a single term for the type of acts described above. These
acts are most often referred to as ‘juridical acts’ in the English language, I will also
use the term ‘juridical act’ for the acts addressed in this work.10 Other terms used are
‘legal act’ or ‘legal transaction’, the last of these brings to mind mostly sales trans-
actions, whereas the first is also used as a contradiction to an ‘illegal’ act. For those
reasons I felt they were less suitable terms, this in combination with the fact that in
Europe, on the basis of the DCFR, the term ‘juridical act’ has become the most
prevailing term used. Therefore I have decided to use the term ‘juridical act’.11
However, it is important to note that I do not refer to the juridical act as can be found
in the DCFR or any other pre-existing concept of a juridical act. The goal is to craft
a new (theoretical) concept of a juridical act, and it is to that act, the one I will craft,
that I refer to when I use the term ‘juridical act’.
This juridical act is an act:
–– which aims to create new legal facts,
–– the legal consequences of which, the new legal facts, are at least partially repre-
sented in the content of the act, and
–– the legal consequences of which come about because the act was performed with
the aim of creating exactly those consequences.
By creating new legal consequences one can influence one’s own legal status, but
also the status of someone else, or even the legal status of a whole group of people.
For example: when Jasper sends in his resignation, he changes his own legal status,
simply put, from being employed to being unemployed (including the myriad of
legal changes that this new status brings about). On the other hand, when the legisla-
tor changes the law on the legal age for drinking alcohol from sixteen to eighteen
years old, it creates a new valid law. This law changes the legal status of large
groups of people, most notably the sixteen and seventeen-year olds, who will go
from being ‘allowed to drink alcohol’ to ‘not allowed to drink alcohol’. Both Jasper
and the legislator performed a juridical act in order to create these legal changes.
7
See a.o.: Hart (1983), pp. 88–120, 265–277.
8
I will use single quotation marks (‘…’) for terms, both to denote that it is a term and when an
unusual term is used, for concepts and quotes and I will use, what I call, square quotation marks
(˹…˺) for facts.
9
DCFR 2009 art II. – 1:101.
10
Schmidt (2012).
11
Obviously this is a personal choice, the connotations people have with words are highly colored
by their use and experience of the words in combination with their legal culture. However, a choice
had to be made, and therefore it became ‘the juridical act’ for the reasons stated.
1.2 Concepts in Law 3
The goal is to develop a new concept of a ‘juridical act’, a concept which is not
a part of any existing national legal system, but that represents commonalities and
ideas that stem from the Western legal tradition. The definition given above is a
mere starting point for the research into this concept.
I will first give some insight into different types and functions of concepts, and
thereby I will explain in Sect. 1.2 exactly the scope of the concept researched. In
Sect. 1.3 it is explained that a working knowledge will be tried to be amassed. After
that, in Sect. 1.4, I will discuss the method used. Then in Sect. 1.5 I will introduce
the two main theoretical stepping stones for the research done. In Sect. 1.6 I will
give a short overview of the theoretical concept as it is developed in this work and
finally, in Sect. 1.7, I will briefly introduce some of the arguments why the work
done is valuable.12
In the introduction it was stated that the goal is to craft a new (theoretical) concept
of a juridical act. However, before a concept can be crafted, it is important to address
concepts, what they are and the roles they can play in law and legal research.
Many terms in legal rules and legal doctrine, such as contract, licence, owner-
ship, judgment, tort, juridical act, jurisdiction, and thief, express concepts. Concepts
play an important role in law; they are used in various functions, both practical and
theoretical. In legal practice, discussions often involve the question whether a cer-
tain state of affairs is an instantiation of a legal concept, for example: ‘Is this man a
thief’? However, concepts often play a role in theories about the law too.13 I will
elaborate: for the physical world, natural sciences develop theories that describe and
explain this world. For example, part of biological theory is concerned with the
inner workings of the human body. In the same vein, the world of law14 and its facts
and objects are the subject matter of legal doctrine and legal theory and possibly
other forms of legal science.15 This can be represented schematically in Fig. 1.1.
Concepts can also play a role in legal theory, for example, in order to classify and
describe the objects in the world of law.
An example of a concept that is used in legal theory is Kelsen’s concept of the
Grundnorm, which is used as part of his (pure) theory of law.16 Because legal
12
I will argue this point more extensively later, in Chap. 4.
13
Both in practice and in theory, concepts are used in many ways. These are just examples.
14
The term ‘the world of law’ will be explained more fully later. For now I will give Hage’s defini-
tion of the world of law: ‘the world of law in a broad sense consists out of everything the existence
of which is based on the application of legal rules. This includes real estate, mayors, cars, but also
certain kinds of events, acts, states of affairs and rules.’ See: Hage (2011).
15
There also exist forms of legal science that are not concerned with the world of law as their
object, but they have a different object, such as e.g. legal psychology and legal sociology.
16
Kelsen (1960) (2009), pp. 193–220.
4 1 Introduction and Method
c oncepts can serve different functions it is necessary to establish the function and
goal of the concept that is the subject of this research. For that reason, this section
will include a classification of concepts in law. When that classification has been
carried out, the type of concept that will be researched can be understood as one of
the types of concepts that can be found in law and legal discourse.
Legal concepts can have various functions, for example: concepts can be used to
state the law, but they can also be used to help to formulate theories about the law.17
A distinction can be made between three types of concepts based on two factors: the
first factor concerns the function of the concept, its role in law and legal theory and
the second concerns whether a concept is dependent on a specific legal system or
not. Regarding the first factor, the function of the concept, a division can be made
between concepts that either state the law, the concept is used in a law-stating func-
tion, and concepts that are used to formulate theories about the law, the concept is
used in order to be juridical-operative.18 This division has to do with the manner in
which a certain concept is used. It is important to note that these characteristics are
functions of, possibly, one and the same concept. For example, the concept ‘tort’
can be used as a law-stating concept: when a judge rules that a specific action was a
tort. However, the same concept ‘tort’ can also be used in a more descriptive func-
tion, for example when a British lawyer formulates theories about the differences
between tort (English law) and delict (Scots law). In both cases the concept is used
in a different function.
A second division can be made between concepts that are based completely on
the laws or rules of one system—such as, for example, a national legal system or the
17
The fact that a concept can be used with different ‘meanings’ dependent on what its function is
can be compared to Wittgenstein’s later ideas concerning how the meaning is dependent on ‘gram-
matic rules’. For an overview of Wittgenstein and his importance for legal concepts and meaning
see: Fleuren (2015).
18
This distinction comes from the work of Frändberg on concepts: Frändberg (2009).
1.2 Concepts in Law 5
laws of the European Union—and concepts that are independent of any specific set
of rules. This division concerns different concepts. Even though the terminology
may be the same, the concept is different. For example, in English law the term
‘claim’ is used to denote a system-dependent concept, which concerns demanding
or asserting a right (in court). Hohfeld, in his work on fundamental legal concepts,
also used the term ‘claim’ for one of his concepts and here the concept ‘claim’ cor-
relates to his concept of ‘duty’.19 A Hohfeldian duty is something which ought or
ought not to be done. The claim correlates with this duty: if a claim is violated a
duty is violated. For example, if Annie has a claim that Jan stays off her land, Jan
has the corresponding duty towards Annie to stay off her land.20 This Hohfeldian
concept is system-independent; it is not based on the specific legal rules of a certain
system, as opposed to the term ‘claim’ as used in English law.21 The same term
‘claim’ here denotes two different concepts: the English claim, which is system-
dependent and the Hohfeldian claim, which is system-independent. On the other
hand, in the first example the term ‘tort’ referred to the same concept twice, but the
concept was used in a different function in each situation.
With the help of these distinctions it is possible to draft a matrix, as shown in
Table 1.1, in which we can find three types of concepts.
System-dependent concepts can be both law-stating and juridical-operative in
function, while system-independent concepts are by nature juridical-operative.
After all, if the concept does not belong to a specific system or set of legal rules, it
cannot state the law, but it can only be used to formulate theories about the law in
general. On the other hand, law-stating concepts are always system-dependent: in
order to be law-stating they need to function within a certain system.
In order to facilitate easy reference to the different kinds of concepts, I will use
the following terminology: A constitutive concept is defined by the rules of a spe-
cific legal system and plays a law-stating role within that system. An example of
such a concept is the German concept of ‘Mörder’,22 as (partially) defined by art.
211 Strafgesetzbuch.23 The concept of Mörder determines which states of affairs are
19
Hohfeld (1913); in his earliest work he still used the term ‘right’.
20
Hohfeld (1913).
21
Hohfeld does not make a distinction between system-dependent and system-independent
concepts.
22
Comparable to murder.
23
211 StGB: (1) Der Mörder wird mit lebenslanger Freiheitsstrafe bestraft. (2) Mörder ist, wer aus
Mordlust, zur Befriedigung des Geschlechtstriebs, aus Habgier oder sonst aus niedrigen
Beweggründen, heimtückisch oder grausam oder mit gemeingefährlichen Mitteln oder um eine
andere Straftat zu ermöglichen oder zu verdecken, einen Menschen tötet. <http://www.gesetze-im-
internet.de/stgb/__211.html> (last checked 20-08-2018).
6 1 Introduction and Method
categorised as murder and what the consequences are. As such, the concept is used
in a law-stating, constitutive function. A different example is the concept of ‘chat-
tel’24 in English law. Even though the definition of the concept is not codified as
such, chattel is used in English law for a category of goods and, in that role, ‘chattel’
is constitutive.25
However, it is also possible to use a concept in order to formulate theories about
the law. If this concept is used purely for the law of one country and bases itself
completely on that set of rules, it could be argued that the resulting concept is
system-dependent and it is a descriptive concept. Its content is determined com-
pletely by the rules and principles of one legal system. It is possible, for example, to
develop an extensive definition of the French concept ‘propriété’,26 based on French
rules and principles concerning propriété and not merely on the codified rule in art.
544 Code Civil.27 This concept would be limited to a description of French law and
could be used to formulate theories about French law, but as such it is not constitu-
tive as it does not state the law. The function of this concept is to describe the French
law. Another example could be the Dutch concept of ‘bestuurlijke boete’.28 When
this concept is used in a discussion of whether it is desirable to have a sanction out-
side of the domain of criminal law, the concept is used in a descriptive function.
Theoretical concepts are used to formulate theories about the law in general.
Theoretical concepts are not limited to the rules and principles of a specific legal
system. Hart, for example, identified ‘rules of adjudication’.29 This concept is used
to formulate theories about law, but, as such, it is not defined by specific legal rules.
It is system-independent in the sense that it is not linked to any specific set of legal
rules or any specific legal system. Another example might be a concept of ‘property’
that is not based on the rules of a specific legal system. Philosophical ideas about
what property is and what can be owned could be the basis for such a theoretical
concept of property.
In order to study a concept, it is important to know the type of the concept that is
under investigation. After all, one term can be used for several types of concept. For
example, the term ‘juridical act’ can be used to stand for a constitutive concept, for
instance when it is used in the DCFR to state law. An enquiry into this concept will
differ from the study of the theoretical concept of a ‘juridical act’, because constitu-
tive concepts only concern the internal legal rules of the system they belong to. The
24
Movable property.
25
E.g. in the Law of Property Act 1925, 87(3): Such declaration shall not affect the priority of the
mortgage or his right to retain possession of the documents, nor affect his title to or right over any
fixtures or chattels personal comprised in the mortgage. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/
Geo5/15-16/20> (last checked 20-08-2018).
26
Comparable to the concept ‘property’.
27
Art 544 Code Civil: ‘La propriété est le droit de jouir et disposer des choses de la manière la plus
absolue pourvu qu’on n’en fasse pas un usage prohibé par la loi ou les règlements’.
28
Literal translation by the author: administrative penalty. It is a pecuniary sanction that can be
executed by a public body such as a.o. the local government. It is therefore a sanction that is not
part of the domain of criminal law.
29
Hart (1961) (2012), pp. 94–99.
1.4 Method: Exchange Between Theory and Practice 7
30
More on the value in Sect. 1.7 and Chap. 4.
31
Most examples will be derived from Dutch law.
8 1 Introduction and Method
these theories makes it possible to gain insights into the concept of a juridical act
that are unrelated to system-dependent legal rules. For example, according to Dutch
legal rules the will is a necessary component of the rechsthandeling, however, in
practice, there is a rise in the incidence of computers who seem to perform recht-
shandelingen, while they lack a will and therefore should be unable to perform these
acts. An example of this, the Dutch student grants32 are issued completely automati-
cally, by computers. It is assumed that computers cannot act intentionally, as they
lack the necessary will to perform a juridical act. Philosophical theories about action
and intention can help in delineating whether or not computers can perform juridi-
cal acts. Thereby a more precise concept of ‘juridical act’ can be extracted.
The goal is to develop a theoretical concept of a ‘juridical act’ that fits within the
Western legal tradition. In order to accomplish that, an exchange between knowl-
edge of system-dependent rules and practices and system-independent legal and
philosophical theories is necessary. Through that exchange a theoretical concept can
be found that is based on the Western legal basic lexical meaning of the term ‘juridi-
cal act’. Due to the different concepts within the Western legal tradition—such as
rechtshandeling, Rechtsgeschäft, acte juridique, etcetera—the lexical meaning of
the term ‘juridical act’ in the Western legal world is vague. For example, the Dutch
concept rechtshandeling is present in both private and administrative law, while the
German concept Rechtsgeschäft is limited to private law. Is the concept ‘juridical
act’ then limited to private law or not? In order to answer that question and develop
a theoretical concept, I will use knowledge from both system-dependent legal rules
and philosophical theories. The resulting definition will thus be rooted in the
Western legal tradition, but it will also be clear and precise.
The aim is to create a reflective equilibrium,33 where the concept is formed partly
by ‘intuitions’, ideas from theory, and partly by knowledge of what acts are in legal
practice indeed classified as juridical act, and what legal consequences acts can have
in practice. To bring about this result, there will be an exchange between theoretical
ideas and knowledge gained from legal practice in different existing legal systems.
Both intuitions should reach equilibrium; they should be balanced. This is shown
schematically in Fig. 1.2.
In the section above, the use of philosophical theories was mentioned as an impor-
tant part of the method for creating a clear theoretical concept of ‘juridical act’.
Much of the theoretical framework relies on two theories that form the foundation.
32
Studiefinanciëring, I have translated this as student grants. DUO (the institution that grants these)
uses ‘student finances’, but I believe ‘students grants’ is a better translation. <https://duo.nl/par-
ticulieren/international-student/student-finance/how-does-it-work.asp> (last checked
20-08-2018).
33
See a.o.: Daniels (2013); Rawls (1971), pp. 17–22, 46–53.
1.5 Two Theoretical Stepping Stones 9
T heoretical
concept
The views represented in these theories can be found as a common theme all through
this work. Hereafter I will introduce these two stepping stones.
The first stepping stone concerns the view of the law that is adopted for this research.
There are different views on the law, and the view on the law which is held influ-
ences the research and thereby the opinions formed on the law and its concepts. For
that reason, I will explicitly express what my view of the law is, since it is of great
influence in developing the theoretical concept. I will distinguish between two dif-
ferent views that are diametrical opposites, even if in legal practice they often seem
to overlap in our reasoning.34 I believe the views generally put forward make up the
two main views and most other views consist of derivatives of these two views. This
opinion is in line with the work of Hage; the law can be seen either as an institu-
tional fact or as a discursive practice.35 I will shortly address these two differing
notions and reveal that I rest my theory on the view that the law is institutional.
34
Hage (2011), in order to see how differences that are close to this distinction can create differ-
ences in legal discourse see Smith (2014).
35
Hage (2011).
10 1 Introduction and Method
In the section above the parallel was drawn between the discovery of legal facts and
the discovery of so-called ‘brute’ or ‘physical’ facts. At first this may seem strange,
since the fact that there are three children in the playground is physical, a brute fact,
and legal facts are not.40 However, when the law is viewed as institutional, both the
fact: ˹there are three children in the playground˺ and legal facts are, prior to their
‘discovery’, existing facts. There are differences between both facts, but they share
similarities. However, as opposed to the fact ˹there are three children in the play-
ground˺, legal facts are not brute, but institutional. I will explain shortly.
36
Dworkin (1986), pp. 52, 90; Asser-Scholten (algemeen deel) (1974), pp. 1–129; van Dunné
(1971).
37
Smith (2014).
38
Hage (2011).
39
These ‘square’ quotation marks are used to denote facts.
40
For this work, I accept that there is such a thing as a physical world existing independently of
human influence and I do not entertain any other ontological notions.
1.5 Two Theoretical Stepping Stones 11
For facts in the physical world, such as the number of children present, it can be
assumed that they, for a large part, exist independently of their observation by
human beings. Even if there are no human beings counting, or no one will ever
discover the number of children, there will still be a certain number of children pres-
ent. The existence of a fact about the number of children in the playground can
therefore be seen as a ‘brute fact’. However, in the world there exist also many facts
that are dependent on human beings. Certain facts are based on beliefs people have.
These types of facts are ‘social facts’, such as the fact that: ˹diamonds are valuable˺.
As a special category of social facts there are institutional facts, which are depen-
dent on human beliefs, but they come into being on the basis of a rule. Legal facts
can be an example of institutional facts. Because legal rules—which are dependent
on human beings; humans created them and believe in their power—exist, it can be
a fact that ˹Jaap owns this watch˺. This legal fact then is an institutional fact, as it
came into being because certain conditions of certain legal rules were fulfilled. If a
judge then has to determine whether or not Jaap is the owner of the watch, the judge
merely needs to discover a pre-existing fact, which came about on the basis of
rules.41
This is a very short and simple explanation of social facts and institutional facts
and rules. Institutional theories of law—that conceptualise the law as rule-based—
emphasise the role of rules in creating legal facts. This view corresponds with the
views of Hart, and MacCormick & Weinberger.42
Institutional theories of law, as a group of theories on law, were put on the map
by MacCormick and Weinberger, and the extensive foundations upon which they
built their theory can be found in their work.43 I will not discuss all of those founda-
tions. However, I will discuss one of the more important aspects: the difference
between so-called ‘brute’ and ‘institutional’ facts, which was mostly taken from the
analytical work of Anscombe and Searle.44 Hereafter the concept of a social reality
next to a physical reality and the different types of facts—brute (or physical), social,
and institutional—one can then distinguish will be introduced. It will be argued that
the law is a part of social reality and that it is ultimately based on social recognition
and acceptance. For that reason, the notion of the ‘world of law’ will be introduced
in Sect. 1.5.1.3.
41
Hage (2011).
42
Hart (1961) (2012); MacCormick and Weinberger (1986).
43
MacCormick and Weinberger (1986), pp. 1–30. A good introduction to institutional theories of
law can be found in: Hage (1998).
44
Anscombe (1958); Searle (1969), pp. 33–37, and in later work from Searle: Searle (1996),
pp. 31–57; Searle (2010), pp. 42–123.
12 1 Introduction and Method
45
In all future cases I will use the term ‘reality’ instead of ‘world’. The only exception is the
expression ‘world of law’, since this is an existing term. There is no difference between ‘reality’
and ‘world’ in this sense; the terms can be used interchangeably.
46
For more on social reality see e.g. Searle (1996, 2010), Tuomela (2002) and Gilbert (1992).
47
Facts can be denoted by a descriptive sentence. For example, the descriptive sentence: the dog is
barking, describes a certain state of affairs in the world. If that state of affairs exists, the sentence
is true, then it is a fact. If the state of affairs does not exist (the dog is not barking but silent), the
sentence is false, and it is a non-fact. Terms in sentences (such as ‘dog’) can denote an object, I use
the term ‘object’ for anything that is an entity; that exists by itself, an object however does not need
to be material.
48
Anscombe (1958).
49
With physical properties I mean all properties that are part of a physical reality that exists inde-
pendent from human acceptance, they can usually be determined through sensory perception.
50
Tuomela (2002), pp. 122–155.
51
I will hereafter not extensively argue and explain these different theories, since that it outside the
scope of this work. For a good overview see: Epstein (2018).
1.5 Two Theoretical Stepping Stones 13
believes can then lead to the existence of certain social facts within that group. It can
also be argued that certain practices can manifest themselves within a social group.
For example, it can be argued that Hart in his work on the concept of law put a large
emphasis on these legal practices that exist within a certain social group and that put
his ultimate ‘rule of recognition’ in place.52 It can be argued then that, from a social
ontological perspective, these practices ‘ground’, or ultimately form the ‘anchors’
for the social facts.53 In such a way it is possible to metaphysically ground social
facts in brute facts, since the existence of certain (outward) practices of the group
can be described in the form of brute facts. A combination of these theories is also
possible, where one argues that it is on the basis of social acceptance and recogni-
tion, social believes, within a group that certain practices come into being.54 It is
outside the scope of this work to fully consider and justify whether social facts need
to be metaphysically grounded in brute facts, in practices, or whether the collective
social acceptance and recognition within a group is ‘enough’ for their existence. I
merely am trying to show that either way, the end result is the same: it is possible
that within a certain social group social facts come into existence. I personally feel
that in order for a certain practice to exist in a social group, there need to exist cer-
tain social believes as well, concerning that exact practice. Without a common set of
believes, there can never be a social practice. For that reason I will in this work refer
to social acceptance and recognition as the reason for the existence of social facts.
It is furthermore possible through social acceptance and recognition to attribute
a particular social status to objects.55 Such a status is usually represented by a label
which is attached to these objects. The ‘brute’ object now has an extra social layer,
as it were. For example, a piece of paper, a brute object, is regarded as a piece of
money. Similarly, Barack Obama was the President of the United States of America,
‘President of the USA’ was the label that was attributed to him. It is therefore a
social fact that ˹Barack Obama was the president of the USA˺. It is also possible that
powers, rights and duties are attached to such a status. For example, the President of
the USA has the power to nominate federal judges.56 Attribution of the status of
President therefore also involves the attribution of the power to nominate federal
judges.
52
Hart (1961) (2012), pp. 100–110.
53
For such a study that focuses on Hart’s theory see: Epstein (2015), pp. 88–100.
54
I personally feel that this is what Hart was aiming at, he seems to put an emphasis on the recogni-
tion of certain practices and rules (by the officials of a system): Hart (1961) (2012), pp. 100–110.
55
Moreover, objects themselves can be social (or institutional). Rules for example are objects and
they can be social in nature.
56
For more on labels and statuses see e.g. Searle (1996), pp. 13–23, 31–126; Searle (2010),
pp. 58–60.
14 1 Introduction and Method
57
In the case of MacCormick, he explicitly means institutive, consequential and terminative rules.
MacCormick and Weinberger (1986), pp. 53–54. I will hereafter adapt his taxonomy of rules in
Sect. 3.2.
58
Not only is the existence of the rule an institutional fact, the rule itself is an institutional object.
1.5 Two Theoretical Stepping Stones 15
As this example of Dutch law illustrates, rules can either be directly or indirectly
based on social acceptance and recognition. In the latter case, the rules that are
based on other rules, which are possibly based on again other rules, are, at the end
of the chain, based on social acceptance and recognition. Institutional facts, includ-
ing facts of the type that a rule is valid, therefore ultimately derive their existence
from social acceptance and recognition.59
Law as a whole can be seen as a part of social reality. Its existence ultimately
depends on social acceptance and recognition. One way to look at the law is as a
system, a network of rules and facts connected by legal rules. Viewed in this way,
we can call this network ‘the world of law’. The world of law is a termed coined by
Hage; he uses it to denote an institutional legal reality:
the world of law in a broad sense consists out of everything the existence of which is based
on the application of legal rules. This includes real estate, mayors, cars, but also certain
kinds of events, acts, states of affairs and rules.60
The world of law is then a view of the law as an institutional, rule-based part of
social reality.
The operation of rules in the world of law is in a sense ‘autonomous’; legal rules
can create new institutional facts without being applied by human beings. It is even
possible that legal facts come into existence while no man knows about them (yet).
The reason that this is possible is because it is accepted and recognised that the law
is capable of functioning ‘autonomously’ in this manner.61
Assume for example, that Marleen and Nicoline are two sisters. Marleen is a
wealthy and eccentric lady who hardly ever speaks to anyone. In order to be sure
that her house will go to Nicoline when she dies, she transfers the ownership of the
house to Nicoline, but reserves a usufruct for herself. For the rest of her life Marleen
can enjoy and live in her house, but the house is formally owned by Nicoline. If
Marleen dies, the usufruct will end and Nicoline will be able to fully possess her
property. The sad day arrives when Marleen actually passes away. However, due to
the fact that she has had barely any contact with other people, her body is not dis-
covered until a week later. Since the usufruct ended at the moment Marleen died,
during that week, the usufruct did not exist anymore and Nicoline was already the
full owner of the property. This is the case even though nobody was aware of the
fact. This means that the law created new legal facts, even before there was knowl-
edge of these facts. The facts did not become known until Marleen’s body was
59
This idea of law as a system that contains rules and is ultimately based on social recognition and
acceptance stems from Hart’s work. Hart described the law as ultimately resting on the ‘rule of
recognition’, the rule that states what is the law, which is accepted by officials. Hart (1961) (2012),
pp. 100–123.
60
Hage (2011).
61
Hart (1961) (2012), pp. 79–123.
16 1 Introduction and Method
d iscovered. Even though it was unknown to Nicoline or anyone else in the world,
Nicoline would be liable for the real estate taxes incurred during that time and
would bear all other legal responsibilities that are attached to ownership.62
When I refer to the law I will hereafter refer to the world of law: the world of law
is rule-based, it comprises all objects, facts and rules that are rule-based themselves.
Ultimately the world of law is a part of social reality; it owes its existence to the
collective acceptance and recognition by people. As such, rules can, autonomously,
create new institutional facts.
For the creation of the theoretical concept of a juridical act, one of the founda-
tions is the view of the law as an institutional fact. I choose to study the law as an
institutional fact. If one views the law as constructive, the possible existence of any
and all new facts would have to be argued. This would leave little room for juridical
acts as tools to create new facts.63 The creation of a theoretical concept of a juridical
act makes more sense when the law is viewed as an institutional fact. Furthermore,
the law does not only play a role when it comes to settling disputes. It enables and
guides many aspects of our lives that do not involve a court of law. For example the
existence of a new company, a house that has a new owner, a licence that has been
granted, all these new facts can be established through legal rules. The fact that all
that is possible without needing a court of law to ‘construct’ for example the exis-
tence of the company is another reason why the law is best studied as institutional.
Moreover, institutional theories of law seem better equipped to explain those occur-
rences where the law acts ‘autonomously’.
The second foundation of the theoretical concept is speech act theory. For the cre-
ation of the theoretical concept of a juridical act, it is of importance to realise that it
is indeed an act. To be more precise, it is not just any act but an act that is used to
communicate a certain goal to the outside world. As such, it can be argued that all
juridical acts are acts of communication, or as they are more commonly called,
‘speech acts’.64
The possibility to act through the use of communication, to use language to act,
is explored in speech act theories. These theories are concerned with the different
uses of language, for instance with the difference between describing something,
62
This example closely resembles and is inspired by the example that can be found in: Hage (2013),
pp. 277–304.
63
This might explain Van Dunné’s theory, where juridical acts are all acts that are, by a judge,
normatively interpreted as having legal consequences. This means that all acts that have legal
consequences are juridical acts, and whether they have legal consequences or not is dependent on
normative interpretation. See Van Dunné (1971).
64
This is indeed a commonly held belief, see a.o.: Nieuwenhuis (1979), pp. 23–32; Hage (2011);
Ruiter (1992, 1993); Tiersma (1986); Schane (2012); Trosborg (1991); Hart (1983), p. 276; Kurzon
(1986); Hogg (2011); Charnock (2009).
1.5 Two Theoretical Stepping Stones 17
e.g. ‘the table is white’, and performing other acts with language, e.g. ‘congratula-
tions on your birthday’. In the second example, communication is used to act, to
congratulate someone. This possibility to act with language is an essential precondi-
tion for the performance of a juridical act. All juridical acts need to be communi-
cated. After all, if the juridical act does not reach at least one other person, at any
given point in time, its effects will never be noticed by anybody and could just as
well not have existed at all.65
Communication is possible both through language utterings, which are most
readily associated with communication, and by means of other meaningful acts. For
example, through the wave of a hand we can communicate various things. Depending
on the situation, it can be a greeting (e.g. while walking along the street when one
meets an acquaintance), a bid at an auction (e.g. when in an auction room during
bidding), or a plea for help (e.g. when one is drowning).
Apart from the simple fact that communication is necessary for a juridical act, it
is important to note that the juridical act is an act, aimed at creating legal conse-
quences. Speech act theory, a branch of philosophy of language, is concerned with
the use of language as a means to act. One of the main observations that started
speech act theory is, roughly speaking, that a speech act can either be used to
describe the world or as a means to bring about a change in the world. For example,
when a couple says ‘I do’66 when they marry, they change their legal and marital
status by means of that speech act. However, when at the wedding it is said that ‘the
wedding dress is white’ this speech act describes the existing set of facts in the
world.67 As will be shown, speech act theory can give many insights into the com-
munication that takes place when a juridical act is performed.
The idea that juridical acts are speech acts is well established in legal science.
Many authors have used insights from speech act theory to gain a better understand-
ing of how the law and juridical acts operate.68 In the Netherlands, for example,
Nieuwenhuis recognised juridical acts as speech acts in his thesis on principles of
contract law.69 In addition, it has been studied how contract, and offer and acceptance
65
I explicitly say ‘could just as well not have existed’, since it seems possible in law that the legal
consequences can come into existence even if they do not reach anybody. If for example Ivo offers
his car for sale on his website, this would seem to be a valid offer, even if nobody ever visits his
website (it therefore seems to be the case that in law communication can be successful when
uptake is theoretically possible). However, the offer will not be very effective if it never reaches
anybody. I would like to thank Prof. Mr. I. Giesen for this example.
66
I use ‘I do’ here as an example. In reality couples rarely say ‘I do’, often they have lengthy vows
or they simply say ‘yes’. However, due to pop culture the sentence ‘I do’ has become the standard
expression when one talks about people marrying. For the simplicity of the examples I will use the
term ‘I do’ hereafter when I refer to the speech act that is used to marry.
67
What a speech act does and means is always dependent on the situation and the circumstances in
which it is performed.
68
The following examples are only the tip of the iceberg. For our present purpose it is not useful to
give a comprehensive overview of all work on speech acts in legal science.
69
Nieuwenhuis (1979), pp. 23–32.
18 1 Introduction and Method
in particular, are speech acts.70 Speech act theory has not only been used to study
juridical acts in private law. Among others, the creation of laws and the passing of
judicial verdicts have been studied from the perspective that speech acts are
involved.71 Ruiter has studied various public and administrative law juridical acts
extensively from a speech act perspective.72 On a more general level, speech act
theory can be used to highlight the difference between rules and the acts that create
rules.73 Law has its own language, the use of which can be studied with the help of
speech act theory, so that more can be learned about complex judgments and the
constitutive nature of language in law.74 The exchange works both ways: legal
examples are very common in speech act theory, due to the special place that legal
language has within our communicative discourse. Austin, in particular, seems to
have been inspired by legal examples in his famous work ‘How to do things with
words’.75
However, as far this author is aware, none of this work has aimed at developing
a theoretical concept of a juridical act, nor has it focused upon the perspective that
speech act theory offers on juridical acts and the conditions under which a juridical
act does indeed change the set of facts in the world of law.
Speech act theory, and theory of language in general, is quite vast. I will, in this
work, mostly use the work of Austin and Searle, two of the most authoritative
authors with regard to speech acts.
In Sect. 1.3 it was stated that in order to gain a working knowledge of the theoretical
concept of the juridical act it is possible to denote common characteristics of this
group of acts and to look at the relationship between the act and its consequences.
When the theoretical stepping stones, as introduced above, are combined with the
intuitions gained from legal practice one will come to the theoretical concept of a
juridical act that will follow hereafter in this book. As an introduction I will provide
a quick overview of what the common characteristics of the juridical act are and
present the schematic overview that is the end-result of the research conducted.
70
A.o. Tiersma (1986), Schane (2012), Trosborg (1991) and Rijgersberg and van der Kaaij (2013).
Reinach, in his work on social acts in private law, seems to anticipate speech act theory while
describing similar ideas, Reinach (1913) (1983); see Crosby for a discussion on speech act theory
and Reinach’s social acts: Crosby (1983).
71
Kurzon (1986).
72
Ruiter (1992, 1993).
73
Matczak (2013).
74
A whole journal has been dedicated to these lines of enquiry: Journal of Pragmatics 41 2009.
75
Austin (1955) (2009), a.o. pp. 5, 22, 137.
1.6 The Theoretical Concept of a Juridical Act 19
Speech act
Reality
World of law
Contract
Juridical act Leads-to rule
Contractual Contractual
appointment obligation
To contract
B (legally)
A (legally) ought to be
is done
Attached-to rule
Secondary
legal consequence
Contractual obligation
C (legally) ought to
be done
Fig. 1.3 Schematic overview of a juridical act that has both primary and secondary legal
consequences
leads-to rule reads as follows: if the juridical act exists it will lead to primary legal
consequences of the type (illocutionary force of the juridical act) with the content
(propositional content of the juridical act). It is thus the meaning, defined as both
illocutionary force and propositional content, that determines the primary legal con-
sequences of the juridical act. Apart from that attention will be given to the fact that
legal consequences can, in my opinion, inherently be a ‘legal is’ or a ‘legal ought’
and, in conjunction with that, on what this ‘legal is’ or ‘legal ought’ is based.
It will also be studied how the juridical act can lead to legal consequences that
are not represented in the meaning of the act. These legal consequences are what I
will call the ‘secondary legal consequences’. As opposed to primary legal conse-
quences, secondary legal consequences are not based on the meaning of the juridical
Another Random Scribd Document
with Unrelated Content
intestines were found closely adherent together. Another
monomaniac thought the devil had stretched a cord across her
stomach;—her heart was adherent to its bag. Another believed that
her body was stolen by the devil;—she was in reality paralytic, and
insensible to blows or pricking.
To explain some of these illusions, Jason Pratensis very gravely
asserts, that “the devil being a slender incomprehensible spirit, can
easily insinuate and wind himself into human bodies, and, cunningly
couched in our bowels, terrify our souls with fearful dreams.”
I may add that we see, in some, a delirious transmigration of
sensation. Parkinson relates these cases. One referred his own
sensation to others, telling his nurse that his visitors were hungry,
while his own voracity plainly indicated that the hunger was in
himself. Another, in a fit of intoxication, insisted on undressing all his
family, as they were drunk, and could not do it themselves.
Now we certainly move ourselves unconsciously in our sleep as a
relief from painful positions. If, however, these uneasy sensations
are increased from stagnant blood about the heart and lungs, the
oppression is extreme, and loads the moving powers; producing a
transient agony and an intense effort. If this were unsuccessful on
the limbs and speech, the result would be often destructive.
The night-mare dreamers are usually lethargic, and their ideas
are often wild and visionary.
Polidori, the author of the “Vampire,” was a prey to night-mare;
he died with a laudanum bottle in his bed. And Coleridge might have
thus left a sad and pointed moral; blazoning his wretched suicide to
that world, which unconsciously has pored with a thrill of admiration
over those fruits of his delinquency, the romantic and unearthly
stories of Christabel and the Ancient Mariner.
The grand feature of night-mare, then, is impediment: but how
can I record all its varieties of miserable struggles; of attacks and
manglings from wild monsters: of the rolling of mountains on the
heart: or the unhallowed embraces of a witch?
The young lady who reads mythology, will fancy herself a syrinx,
and struggle to escape from the amorous clutches of Pan. If we
have been thinking of Chamouni and her giant peaks of snow, we
may be overwhelmed in our sleep by the fall of an avalanche; or we
may be dashed off a precipice, and feel ourselves falling into
interminable space without a hope of resting.
A lady whom I know, and who is a frequent subject of night-
mare, is very uniform in this dreamy occupation. She is shaken to
and fro in her bed by fiends, and the process seems to her to occupy
considerable time. And there are many who are tortured by the
feeling that they are buried alive, and attempt to cry out, and beat
against their coffin-lid in vain. Aurelian writes, that the epidemics in
Rome were premonished by incubus.
These, and thousands of a similar kind, might be cited; but a
vivid imagination, with a hint or two, will readily create them at its
pleasure.
“A battalion of French soldiers, during the toils and dangers of a
campaign, were marching on a certain point on a most oppressive
day, and at double the usual speed; their strength was eight
hundred men, all hardy, seasoned, and courageous; careless of
danger, despising the devil, and little occupied with the thoughts of
ghosts and phantasmagoria. On the night of the occurrence in
question, the battalion was forced to occupy a narrow and low
building at Tropœa, barely calculated to accommodate three
hundred persons. Nevertheless, they slept; but, at midnight, one and
all were roused by frightful screams issuing from all quarters of the
house; and to the eyes of the astonished and affrighted soldiers
appeared the vision of a huge dog, which bounded in through the
window, and rushed with extraordinary heaviness and speed over
the breasts of the spectators. The soldiers quitted the building in
terror. Next night, by the solicitations of the surgeon and chef-de-
bataillon, who accompanied them, they again resumed their previous
quarters. ‘We saw,’ says the narrator, ‘that they slept. We watched
the arrival of the hour of the preceding panic, and midnight had
scarcely struck when the veteran soldiers, for the second time,
started to their feet. Again they had heard the supernatural voices,
again the visionary hound had bestrode them to suffocation. The
chef-de-bataillon and myself heard or saw nothing of these events.’ ”
The superstitious thought this spectre to be the devil; but the
heat and carbonic acid gas were, I believe, enough for the
excitement of the phantasm and the feeling.
There can scarcely be imagined a more terrific feeling than this
sense of extreme danger, or difficulty, this intense impediment,
without a power to avert it. The constant labour of Sisyphus, with
his rolling-down stone, and the punishment of Tantalus, would yield
in severity to the agony of night-mare, but for its transient existence.
It seems to me, that this want of balance between will and
power influences human nature so much, that life itself may be
termed one long and painful incubus. The actions we perform
seldom reach the perfection which the will desires. Hence arises that
constant dissatisfaction, which even the close approach to perfection
of some of the most accomplished professors of art and science
cannot avert.
We must confess, with Socrates, that the extent of our
knowledge is indeed but a conviction of our ignorance. The
metaphor of Sir Isaac Newton, on the insignificance of his own
scientific attainments, is well known. Sir Joshua Reynolds so highly
appreciated perfection in his art, that he was ever discontented with
his own paintings; and frequently, as I have heard, by repeated
touches, destroyed the effect of a picture, which had been in its
early stages beautiful. And Dr. Johnson, after astonishing the world
with his perfect specimen of lexicographical composition, confessed
that he “had not satisfied his own expectations.” May I add to these
the frequent discontent of the unrivalled Paganini?
Ida. The desire of the mind is, indeed, unlimited; and when this is
intense, it wishes to appropriate to itself all which it can
comprehend. But disappointment must ensue; for all wish to be the
whole, when they form but a part. Thus will ever be proved the
futility of worldly ambition,—it is never satisfied. But the desires of
religion are not a phantom, or an incubus. True devotion, which
aspires to heaven, as the hart panteth for the water-brooks, will
never fail. Its fervent hopes and devout prayers, we believe, will be
blessed by their accomplishment.
Cast. Then the visitations of the incomparable Mab are nought
but the infliction of the night-mare? Gentle Master Evelyn, how
should I be aweary of your philosophy, but that I am half won over
to believe it true? In good faith,
Ev. Then, I pray you, let me counsel you not to court such visits,
dear Castaly. There is some peril in the touch both of Mab and Mara;
for although rare and transient cases of night-mare excite no alarm,
yet its repetition, in a severe form, is not to be slighted. It
sometimes has been the forerunner of epilepsy; its immediate cause
being obstruction to the course of the blood by which the brain
especially is surcharged, and the action of the lungs and heart
impeded, as we prove by the extreme labour of breathing at the
time we awake.
I believe that there is usually a fulness of blood, also, in the
vessels of the spinal marrow; as, although nightmare may occur in
the sitting, it is far more frequent in the recumbent position. Thus
the marrow is oppressed, and there is then no force transmitted by
the nerves to put the muscles into action.
Distention of the stomach should be prevented, as the diaphragm
is thus pushed up against the lungs, and the gas is accumulated in
the cavity. All these conditions often occur in our waking moods, but
then our judgment tells us how to relieve them speedily; whereas, in
sleep, the load accumulates. All indigestible substances, therefore,
should be avoided, as nuts, cucumbers, shell-fish, &c.
Early and light suppers we advise to those whom Madame Mara
so unmercifully overlies. A mattress should be our couch, and we
should endeavour to compose ourselves on one side, having,
previous to our rest, taken gentle exercise.
SOMNILOQUENCE.—SOMNAMBULISM.
“Doct. A great perturbation in nature. To receive at once the benefit of sleep, and
do the effect of watching.”
Macbeth.
Ev. In the common dream, ideas float through the mind, but the
body is passive. When the power of expressing these ideas by
speech is added, it is somniloquence. When there is the conscious,
yet powerless, will to move, it is incubus. When the unconscious
power of moving in accordance with the ideas or wishes of the
dream exists, it is somnambulism.
The common dreams of sleep are not unfolded to us until the
waking recollections of the dreamer relate them; but the matter of a
dream may be half developed during its existence, by the curious
propensity to unconscious talking and walking in the sleep.
Sleep-talking is the slightest of these phenomena, and, indeed,
closely resembles the speaking reveries of some absent people, and
the raving of a maniac. The sleep is, at this time, little deeper than a
reverie.
The voice of the somniloquist is usually natural, but as again, in
the cases of mania and of delirious excitement, a common voice may
become sweetly melodious, and there will be an imparted fluency
allied to the inspiration of the improvisatore.
Indeed, in some young ladies, subject to hysteria, I have known,
at certain periods as it were, a new accomplishment—a style of
singing which was far beyond their power in waking moments. Dr.
Dewar relates a case of a girl who, when awake, discovered no
knowledge of astronomy or the sciences in any way; but when she
was asleep she would define the rotations of the seasons, using
expressions the most apt to the subject, such as “the globe is now
set agee.” It is probable that this was the memory in slumber of
some geographical lesson which she had heard, but did not
remember while her senses were active, that is, in her waking
moments. And an American lady, during a fever, commenced a
course of nocturnal prating, composing most eloquent sermons,
chiefly made up, however, of remembered texts of Scripture.
I am informed, too, that a lady of Edinburgh, during her
somnolent attacks, recited somewhat lengthy poems; and it was
curious to notice that each line commenced with the final letter of
the preceding.
These sleep-talkings are sometimes the mere lispings of an idiot;
although Astrophel, perchance, may contend that the following,
written down from the lips of a servant-maid, is a proof of special
inspiration, converting a rustic girl into an improvisatrice.
Ev. Yet if you analyze their nature you will find them even proofs
of derangement; for you thus see that the faculty of memory is
changed according to the state of mind. In the following case, by Dr.
Abercrombie, we shall find the same variation in impression and
taste. A girl, in her early youth, expressed her abhorrence of tunes
played on the violin, which she termed a discordant fiddle. She was
after this introduced into more refined society, and became a
somnambulist. During her paroxysm she imitated the beautiful airs
which she said she had formerly heard on this same violin.
Lieutenant C—— was once my patient, and died a maniac. The
insanity arose from thwarted ambition, and was confirmed by his
notion that he had seen his death-fetch. For some time he walked
and talked in his sleep; subsequently he would walk for an hour
round the table unconsciously. In him, too, was this change of
feeling. He once talked little, and cared less for his child; but now he
would caress it fondly, and expressed the deepest anxiety for it. It
was difficult to decide, at times, whether this gentleman was awake
or not; indeed, these states of mania, which have been termed
“melancholia errabunda” by Bellini and Montalti, are closely allied to
somnambulism, for the walker is absorbed in deep thought, and
totally unconscious of his actions. And the analogy appears to have
been recognised by the law. It is well known that the brother of Lord
Colepeper, who was a great dreamer and somnambulist, shot a
guardsman and his horse. He was found guilty; but he was pardoned
on the ground of his complete unconsciousness in his
somnambulism.
We do not wonder more to see the perfection with which these
unconscious labours of the somnambulist are performed, than at the
ease and power which is evinced, and the very slight fatigue which
ensues; although the occupation might have been most laborious.
As in chorea the most delicate girls will dance incessantly for
twenty-four hours, resting merely for one sole hour; and yet they
will sit down perfectly cool and free from fatigue.
Ida. Is it not wonderful that the somnambulist will incur great
dangers with complete sang-froid? They will walk over
“Who e’en for change of scene wou’d seek the shades below,”
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com