CASE STUDY THEORIES
CASE STUDY THEORIES
BSBA MM 2-C
Prof. Jhon Ven Saint Pasahol
Consumer Behavior
OBJECTIVES
Cognitive psychology is about how we know, understand, and think about the
world around us. Jean Piaget, a psychologist in his year 1936, was responsible for the
development of Cognitive Learning Theory (CLT) He discovered how our minds develop
and how we acquire language.
To understand Cognitive Learning Theory, it’s vital to understand two key terms:
cognition and metacognition.
Cognition simply refers to thinking. It is the “mental action or process of acquiring
knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses. In contrast,
metacognition means thinking about thinking. Doing so helps us understand how our
thought processes influence our learning. Mastering metacognition means gaining a
deeper understanding of your thoughts and mental processes.
In other words, Cognitive Learning Theory focuses less on what you’re learning
and more on how you’re learning, it’s the difference between mindlessly memorizing
facts to pass a test and building sustainable, repeatable, and substantive learning
patterns that allow for long-term growth. By understanding how to learn, learners can
confidently approach new tasks while also boosting their comprehension and problem-
solving skills.
Cognitive learning promotes a love of learning by making the process of
acquiring new knowledge fun and exciting. Rather than passively listening to new
information, cognitive learning allows you to apply what you've learned and connect the
dots between what you're learning and what you already know.
The Cognitive Learning Theory invites us to consider how our ability to think can
be influenced by both internal and external factors. Examples of these external factors
include whether or not our community values the knowledge we are gaining and
whether or not we receive praise from others for learning new things.
Schema theory proposes that all of our knowledge is organized into mental
frames. Schemas are higher-level cognitive functions that organise memories
maintained in long-term memory. They serve as reference templates when
encountering fresh knowledge.
The Information Processing Theory is made easier by comparing the human
brain to a computer or basic processor. The brain, like a computer, is thought to operate
in a predetermined order. The sequence is as follows: "receives input, processes the
information, and delivers an output".
Information processing theory is currently being used in various industries, areas of
study, and technology careers. Beyond the individual, the concepts, models, and ideas
in information processing are being applied to various entities such as:
Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) is an instructional design theory that deals with how
the human brain processes and stores information. Teachers should be familiar with the
basic principles of CLT as it helps educators consider how learners process knowledge
Cognitive Load Theory helps you design training or learning materials that
reduce the demands on learners' working memory, so that they learn more effectively.
Using of Visual Aids Graphic organizers, pictures, and charts can all serve as
scaffolding tools. Graphic organizers are very specific in that they help kids. Showing
students how to do something and teaching them how to do it can be an effective way
to support learning. Try to solve the problem by walking students through the steps or
explaining the process. You can also assign some students as models for their
classmates.
Typical strategies include trial and error, applying algorithms, and using
heuristics. To solve a large, complex problems, it is often helpful to break the problem
into smaller steps that can be taken individually to arrive at an overall solution.
The goal of cognitive apprentices is to address the problem of idle knowledge
and make the thought process of learning activities visible to both students and
teachers. Cognitive and metacognitive components of learning are concerned with
problem-solving processes and strategies and are used in situations where learners
need to extend their knowledge to new or complex situations outside the classroom.
Cognitive education focuses on revealing internal thought processes for students
to observe and learn. Cognitive apprenticeship theory emphasizes knowledge that can
be applied to real-world settings.
One useful tool in this context is “Technology Enhanced Learning” (TEL). These
are systems based on the use of technology to support and improve the learning
process. The TEL environment provides the opportunity to access a wide range of
materials, content, and information and encourage students to actively participate in
constructing their own knowledge. TEL systems offer valuable opportunities and
alternatives to classical learning methods. Therefore, the use of technology and the
associated flexibility and interactivity are described as leading to improved constructivist
learning environments. By transforming the experience into a learner-centered
approach.
How learning occurs remains a confusing topic for educators and learning
facilitators. Much has been written about learning theories that explain the complex
learning process in all its intricacies. Among the various learning models, behaviorism,
cognitivist, and constructivism have received significant interest in higher education
(Cicciarelli, 2007; Hemming, 2012; Warin, Kolski & Sagar, 2011). These models form
the basis of learning behavior understanding and educational guidance (Yilmaz, 2011).
The Case Study Experience. The faculty at a college of nursing in the United Arab
Emirates embarked on a curriculum transformation exercise; a shift from the traditional
curriculum to the case-based pedagogy. The idea of changing the curriculum was not
met with a great deal of enthusiasm by most of the faculty and students
simultaneously. .
The overarching goal of case-based teaching is developing learners’ higher order
thinking dispositions such as conceptualizing the significance of the data, interpreting
the information, and creating ideas. Through discussion, learners are prompted to find
solutions and determine the best means of implementing the solutions. While learners
voice their thinking, teachers can assess learners’ thinking processes (Facione,
Facione, & Giancarlo, 1997). In this regard, assessment may be geared toward
capturing learner's “orderliness” in working with the problem, “diligence” in searching for
relevant data, “reasonableness” in the selection of the actions, “persistence” through
encountered difficulties, and “precision” in implementing the actions (Facione et al.,
1997). Therefore, it is essential that discussion be structured and skillfully led. Real-life
situations provide the context for learning. The format used to structure the situations in
this case study experience is known as ‘ground breaking’, which, according to Harling
and Akridge (1998), such type of cases have an exploratory nature. The focus is
analysis rather than problem-solving. Each case study introduces the content to be
learned using behavioral terms. Integrated in each case are fundamental concepts such
as pathophysiology, pharmacology, professional practice, and social behavior. To
promote learning with cases, students must be responsible and self-directed and must
value cooperation and collaboration in learning (Barnes et al., 1994). Students develop
these attributes as soon as they take part in the educational process. In their search,
students either work individually or in groups. The effectiveness of case-based teaching
is highly contingent on the educator’s knowledge and skills in leading discussions and
fostering engagement (Barnes et al., 1994). Apart from drafting the cases, educators
decide on groups, determine learning activities, monitor group interaction, guide and
lead the discussion, and assess and evaluate the learning process. Without seeking
insights into issues and concerns of case-based learning, application and effectiveness
of the approach will remain unclear (Lauver, West, Campbell, Herrold, & Wood, 2009;
Tanner, 2009), and curriculum transformation will be an ordeal.
References:
Benjamin & Main (2022). Cognitive Load Theory: A teacher's guide. Retrieved
from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/cognitive-load-theory-a-teachers-guide
Bruin, L. R. (2019). The use of cognitive apprenticeship in the learning and
teaching improvisation: Teacher and Students perspective. Retrieved from
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1321103X18773110
Cherry, K. (2022). What is Cognitive Psychology? The Science of How We Think.
Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/cognitive-psychology-4157181
Cherry, K. (2023). Jean Piaget Biography (1896-1980). Retrieved from
https://www.verywellmind.com/jean-piaget-biography-1896-1980-2795549
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper experiment:
An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology
Research and Development, 40, 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296707
Cuncic, A. (2023). Information Processing Theory in Psychology. Retrieved from
https://www.verywellmind.com/information-processing-theory-in-psychology-7503601
Imiere, E. (2019). An Application of Cognitive Apprenticeship to Philosophy
Instruction. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED613714.pdf
Kok, A. (2009). Understanding the Technology Enhanced Learning Environments
from A Cognitive Perspective. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42386204_Understanding_the_Technology_E
nhanced_Learning_Environments_from_A_Cognitive_Perspective
Lina, K. D. (2013). Demystifying instructional innovation: The case of teaching
with case studies. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1011686.pdf
Main, P (2023). Information Processing Theory. Retrieved from
https://www.structural-learning.com/post/information-processing-theory
Malmstrom, H. (2023). Cognitive Learning Theory: History, Examples, &
Strategies. Retrieved from https://www.edapp.com/blog/cognitive-learning-theory/
Morrison, D. (2013). How course design puts the focus on learning not teaching.
Retrieved from https://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/how-couse-
design-puts-the-focus-on-learning-not-teaching/
Murray, D. (2022). Cognitive learning theory: benefits and examples. Retrieved
from https://www.go1.com/blog/cognitive-learning-theory
Pankin, J. (2013). Schema Theory. Retrieved from
https://web.mit.edu/pankin/www/Schema_Theory_and_Concept_Formation.pdf
Paris et al., (2021). Cognitive Theorists- Piaget, Elkind, Kohlberg and Gilligan.
Retrieved from
https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Early_Childhood_Education/Book
%3A_Child_Growth_and_Development_(Paris_Ricardo_Rymond_and_Johnson)/
14%3A_Adolescence_-_Cognitive_Development/14.03%3A_Cognitive_Theorists-
_Piaget_Elkind_Kohlberg_and_Gilligan
Savage, M. (2008). The Role of Memory in Learning: How Important Is It?
Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/role-of-memory-in-learning