The document provides detailed comments and suggestions for improving a research paper, covering various chapters including the background, literature review, methodology, and findings. Key points include the necessity of citations, proper formatting, and specific content requirements for each section. It emphasizes the importance of clarity, organization, and adherence to academic standards throughout the research document.
The document provides detailed comments and suggestions for improving a research paper, covering various chapters including the background, literature review, methodology, and findings. Key points include the necessity of citations, proper formatting, and specific content requirements for each section. It emphasizes the importance of clarity, organization, and adherence to academic standards throughout the research document.
CHAPTER I DONE BACKGROUND AND ITS SETTING Introduction • THERE SHOULD BE CITATIONS! • Citations should not include initials of authors. Example, Herrera, C.D. (2016) is wrong. It should be Herrera (2016) • In the last paragraphs of the introduction, you should be able to discuss: o Justification or reason about the need to conduct the research o Purpose of the study • Introduction should cover at least 5 pages. Statement of the • This should already be in past tense. Problem Assumptions • This is dependent on the number of SOPs. If there are 4 SOPs (excluding the question like: Is there a significant…), there should also be 4 assumptions. • This is presented in numbered format. Hypothesis • This is based on the SOP that states: Is there a significant… • This should be written as NULL. Meaning, it should be: There is no significant… Scope and Delimitation • At least 2 paragraphs • This should be written in past tense. Significance of the Study • Can should be written as may, will as may. • There should be at least 6 individuals or groups identified, including the future researchers. Notes • Should be hanging indent • Arranged alphabetically CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES Related Literature • This is not divided into foreign and local. If your paper still has foreign and local, remove those subsections and name them as one as Related Literature. • THERE SHOULD BE CITATIONS! • Citations should not include initials of authors. Example, Herrera, C.D. (2016) is wrong. It should be Herrera (2016) • There should be explanation of the relevance of the considered literatures and it should be done by theme. Related Studies • This is not divided into foreign and local. If your paper still has foreign and local, remove those subsections and name them as one as Related Studies. • THERE SHOULD BE CITATIONS! • Citations should not include initials of authors. Example, Herrera, C.D. (2016) is wrong. It should be Herrera (2016) • There should be explanation of the relevance of the considered studies and it should be done by theme. Synthesis of the State-of- • Remove year, only authors’ surname should appear here. the-Art Gap Bridged by the Study • Discuss in at least two sentences. Conceptual Framework • Paradigm should be labeled as Figure 1. Conceptual and Paradigm Paradigm. • Conceptual Framework should be discussed in at least 3 paragraphs. Theoretical Framework • Paradigm should be labeled as Figure 2. Theoretical and Paradigm Paradigm. • Under paradigm (figure), the theories should be stated first as – Theory of Relativity by Einstein (1948). Then below it, a short description of the theory. • Theoretical Framework should be discussed in at least 3 paragraphs. Definition of Terms • Terms are taken from your Research Title and Statement of the Problem • Define conceptually and operationally • Conceptual definitions are sourced out from dictionaries, online thesaurus, books, etc. Therefore, if you present this definition, it should have CITATIONS! • Operational definitions are definitions of the terms as used in the study. It usually starts with phrases like: “Operationally,…” or “As used in the study…” Notes • Should be hanging indent • Arranged alphabetically CHAPTER III RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY Research Design • This should be written in past tense. • This should explicitly mention your research design and should be defined using a definition from a source. Therefore, there should be CITATION! • Discuss this in at least 2 paragraphs. The Respondents • This should be written in past tense. • This should contain your first table, if applicable and is titled as: Table 1. The Respondents. • Discuss here your respondents in general or as what is appearing in the table. • Discuss this in at least 2 paragraphs. Sampling Design • This should be written in past tense. • This should explicitly mention your sampling design and should be defined using a definition from a source. Therefore, there should be CITATION! • Discuss this in at least 2 paragraphs. Research Instrument • This should be written in past tense. • Discuss here your instrument, the parts of your instrument, discuss each part. • Discuss this in at least 3 paragraphs. Data Gathering • This should be written in past tense. Procedures • Discuss here the steps which you have done up to gathering, tallying and analyzing results. • Discuss this in at least 3 paragraphs. Statistical Treatment • This should be written in past tense. • Discuss here the statistical tools which you have used. • Do not present the formula for percentage and general weighted mean anymore. • Present the formula for inferential statistics like chi- square, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, etc. • Discuss this in at least 3 paragraphs. Notes • Should be hanging indent • Arranged alphabetically CHAPTER IV TITLE OF YOUR RESEARCH SOP 1 • Subsection should be titled based on SOP 1. Example, if your SOP 1 is What is the profile of the respondents in terms of age and gender? Then it should be titled as: 1. Profile of the Respondents. • Table # and title should appear at the TOP of the table. • Interpretation should be done per table. • Interpretation should contain the following: Findings as explicitly presented in the data, Implications based on the data, and Support to the Implications. SOP 2 • Subsection should be titled based on SOP 2. Example, if your SOP 2 is What is the level of time management skills of students? Then it should be titled as: 2. Time Management Skills of the Students. • Table # and title should appear at the TOP of the table. • Interpretation should be done per table. • Interpretation should contain the following: Findings as explicitly presented in the data, Implications based on the data, and Support to the Implications. SOP 3 • Subsection should be titled based on SOP 3. Example, if your SOP 3 is What is the level of academic performance of students? Then it should be titled as: 3. Academic Performance of the Students. • Table # and title should appear at the TOP of the table. • Interpretation should be done per table. • Interpretation should contain the following: Findings as explicitly presented in the data, Implications based on the data, and Support to the Implications. SOP 4 • Subsection should be titled based on SOP 4. Example, if your SOP 4 is Is there a significant difference in the time management skills along academic performance? Then it should be titled as: 4. Statistical Difference in the Time Management Skills Along Performance. • Table # and title should appear at the TOP of the table. • Interpretation should be done per table. • Interpretation should contain the following: Findings as explicitly presented in the data, Implications based on the data, and Support to the Implications. SOP 5 • Subsection should be titled based on SOP 5. Example, if your SOP 1 is What may be proposed based on the results? Then it should be titled as: 5. Proposed Output • Before presenting the actual output, there should be an introductory part (at least 3 paragraphs) describing your proposed output. Then present your output. Notes • Should be hanging indent • Arranged alphabetically CHAPTER V SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Summary • This should discuss in the following: o 1st paragraph: aims/purpose of the study, research design, respondents, sampling instrument, etc. o 2nd paragraph: brief findings, conclusion o 3rd paragraph: mention main recommendations and/or proposed output. Explain briefly • This should also be in past tense Findings • Number dependent on how many the number of SOPs are. • This should reveal results using quantitative (numerical) data. Conclusions ❖ Number dependent on how many the findings are. Recommendations ❖ Number should be at least the number of conclusions. ❖ Last recommendation is for future researchers.
❖ THERE SHOULD BE TITLE PAGE. BE REMINDED TO CHANGE PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 TO INQUIRIES,
INVESTIGATIONS AND IMMERSION ❖ NAME OF RESEARCHERS SHOULD FOLLOW THE FORMAT: FN, MI, LN. LEADER SHOULD BE LISTED FIRST, FOLLOWED BY THE MEMBERS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER. ❖ THERE SHOULD BE PAGE NUMBERS. ❖ MARGINS SHOULD BE 1 INCH FOR TOP, RIGHT AND BOTTOM. 1.5 INCHES FOR LEFT. ❖ PRINT IN 3 COPIES IN A4 SIZED BOND PAPER. YOU MAY USE RECYCLED PAPERS (THOSE WITH PRINTOUT ON ONE SIDE ONLY) ❖ USE CLAMP PER MANUSCRIPT.
Balabac Bastion Designing A Multi Functional Naval Training Facility and Forward Operating Base For Enhanced Defense and Deterrence in The Disputed Spratly Islands