Elect 1 GROUP 4 - Blockchain Use Cases
Elect 1 GROUP 4 - Blockchain Use Cases
Models
● Internal Trade Finance - This model is where an organisation establishes, sets up and manages its own trade
finance process, software system and operating model.
● Externally Outsourced Trade Finance - This model reflects the desire of some buyers to outsource their
procurement.
2|Page
● Ad Hoc or Project- related Trade Finance - As it implies, this model looks at trade finance solutions as project
driven.
● End- User Computing Trade Finance - This is an area of trade finance which is focused on the enterprise.
Figure 7.1 shows the main, high- level stages of a typical trade finance process
Request - The trade finance process begins with a request made within an organisation for materials or goods to be
bought.
Request for Quotation - The next step is for the organisation to process the internal request and publish it as an external-
facing ‘Request for Quotation’, RFQ. The RFQ is usually in the form of a detailed written statement in template form.
Quotation - Following further internal processes, and subject to potentially complex rules within the organisation
concerning price, quality and other attributes of each individual supplier’s offer, the winning supplier quotation will be
selected by the organisation.
PO - A PO sets out the details of the organisation’s confirmed procurement plus price, delivery dates and other
information. Acceptance of a PO by the parties constitutes a legally binding agreement between them.
Goods Receipt - Once the PO has been agreed and executed (i.e. signed), the supplier will – at the specified time and
location – deliver the requested goods and materials to the organisation. This is a critical stage in the trade finance cycle.
Supplier Invoice - Immediately after delivery/ receipt the supplier will issue its invoice and present it for payment by the
organisation, as is its right.
Release Payment - So, following a process of checking and validation of the invoice vs. delivery, the organisation, either
acting alone or via a bank or finance provider, makes cash payment of the invoice to the supplier.
CN/ DN Adjustment - There is then a final stage, if necessary, of credit note (CN) and/ or delivery note (DN, related to
the receipt) adjustment by the organisation and potentially the supplier where there may be final changes made
following reconciliation etc. of the actual delivery vs. PO. At this point the standard trade finance process ends.
The following stresses are among the known issues within typical trade finance models:
● Credit Note/ Delivery Note
● Fraud in Delivery and Payment
● Change of Supplier/ Third Party
Blockchains are already in use in some trade finance solutions as they are perceived to fix existing problems and reduce
risk. Using blockchain technology in trade finance also reduces stack size and means that indirect benefits, such as cash
flow optimisation and faster invoice payments, may be realised.
3|Page
CASELET: ‘Improved Credit Management, Lower Risks and Costs’
Current state: How credit is assessed, calculated and repaid using non-blockchain data and systems.
Buyer issues an RFQ for the next major phase in the Kent bridge building/ civil engineering project to
several suppliers with whom it has worked successfully previously. RFQ responses from suppliers are
received and validated; one winning quotation is selected by the buyer. Buyer and bank agree a line of
credit to cover all the expected POs for the RFQ and deliveries, including a tolerance of x% for contingency.
The bank sets aside the required liquidity and awaits the flow of delivery notes etc. from supplier and
receiver. Each delivery note, once approved, is paid by the bank on behalf of the buyer and, at the end of
the process and following reconciliation; the whole credit facility is repaid to the bank by the buyer.
Buyer issues an RFQ for the next major phase in the Kent bridge/ civil engineering project to several
suppliers with whom it has worked successfully previously. RFQ responses are received and validated; one
winning quotation is selected by the buyer.
Because the bank is a node on the blockchain along with the buyer, each delivery note is paid on a case-
by- case basis and settled by the buyer at the same time, lowering the size of the credit facility, cutting
the total cost of the credit, accelerating the speed of payment for the supplier and reducing the total
liabilities and risk for the bank.
Table 7.3 shows a comparison of example trade finance problem statements and the benefits provided by future- state
blockchains versus current- state technology
In addition, there are other benefits that pertain to the future- state (blockchain- powered) trade finance solution as
follows:
Bank benefits: With a more streamlined ledger offering immutability and transparency, banks benefit from blockchains in
trade finance.
Buyer benefits: Solutions on DLT in general (compared to current- state stacks) offer buyers greater control and
transparency over the whole procurement cycle.
Supplier benefits: DLT trade finance offers the prospect of faster invoice payments, quality assurance, managing the
supplier’s own supply chain and workforce, and better relationships for good suppliers with their customers.
4|Page
Project management benefits: Blockchains provide potential trade finance benefits in respect of the risks facing project
managers in delivery, potential errors in reconciliation and the task of reporting back to both buyer and supplier. DLT
offers potential solutions with accuracy, transparency, immutability and portability.
The Role of Pharmaceutical, Diagnosis and Testing and Records in Healthcare Software
Clinical research, diagnosis, testing and records. The role played by this group is that of non-primary care and
engagement: making sure that the data and outcomes for patients, as managed by physicians and nurses, is progressed,
audited and accessed in the right way at the right time and can be used for clinical research to design and develop new
and better drugs, for example.
Healthtech is defined as the forward-looking group of software applications and services designed and built for specific
use by physicians/ doctors, nurses, patients, hospitals, surgeries and pharmaceutical, diagnosis, testing and record-
keeping companies.
5|Page
· Applications - Applications (not phone apps) are service and functional layers in the healthcare stack and are
deployed on a case-by-case basis.
· Operating Systems - A single operating system would create a common platform for support and enterprise cost
control but, equally, a single point of failure from a commercial, security and control risk standpoint.
Healthcare Data
Healthcare data isn’t only medical records. There is a huge range of static, dynamic and transactional data that is
exchanged between parties, data for archive and data for clinical analysis.
· Privacy - Privacy of data is often cited (by patients) as the most important requirement of any healthcare system.
· Security - Security of data, alongside the issue of privacy, is a key requirement of all primary care users regarding
healthcare data.
· Trust - The question of trust is connected to security and privacy. If these two attributes are present, it is likely
that trust in the healthcare system will be earned by the software provider and granted ‘on licence’ from the users.
· Access- Equitable access to data is a cornerstone of user satisfaction.
6|Page
Wrong Diagnosis. It is rare, but serious misdiagnosis is potentially a significant error in primary care environments. Second
opinions are vital. Their use is manifestly obvious and in this regard healthcare software and data are ready (and non-
judgmental) allies in the cause.
Lost Data. ‘Lost’ data is a seemingly innocuous phrase that can, in healthcare terms, have serious consequences for
patients and sometimes for primary caregivers too. Having made a diagnosis and prescription, for example, a physician
needs continuing access to that information in order to help the patient reach their good outcome.
Wrong Prescription. It’s hard to measure the impact of a wrong or inaccurate prescription on patients: much depends on
the severity or otherwise of their disease.
Healthcare Software Demonstration Problems and Use Case
Physician/doctor benefits: Blockchains assist with trust, meaning that the doctor–patient relationship, based on trust, is
enhanced.
7|Page
Patient benefits: Blockchains provide a decentralised store of immutable, trustworthy and transparent data for better
outcomes.
Supplier benefits: Blockchains provide hospitals, clinics, pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers and suppliers with
reliable, decentralised data that can be used equitably for better non-primary care outcomes.
Healthcare industry benefits: Blockchains provide planning accuracy, transparency and security of data.
Retail investments is the activity of buying and selling financial instruments, for example, mutual funds, equities/ shares
and fixed income bonds. Investments are usually held in an electronic portfolio and the investor usually has access to
advice and an ongoing portfolio management. service.
How Retail Investments Work in the Real World
Retail investments, in the real world, operates in a mixture of mechanical and human processes. Advice and professional
support for investors.
The following activities are typical (but not exhaustive) of a professional retail investments service:
■ Investor onboarding
■ Portfolio construction
■ Portfolio maintenance
■ Investor maintenance
Land Registry: is a public institution that maintains, securely and equitably, the paper and digital records of local real
estate and as much as possible of the legal, taxation and ownership data attributes that pertain to each plot or parcel of
land.
Cadastre: (land registry’s sister word) is normally a parcel-based and up-to-date land information system containing a
record of interests in land (rights, restrictions and responsibilities). It usually includes a geometric description of land
parcels linked to other records describing the nature of the interests, the ownership or control of those interests, and
often the value of the parcel and its improvements.
Land registries and cadastres perform very similar functions, they both provide a secure and validated store of property
and ownership data for use by buyers, sellers, lawyers, surveyors and governments in the administration and management
of real estate.
Legal Entities:
1. Land Registry: The key legal entity in the land registry is the land registry itself. The land registry entity
has an agency that has the power and capacity to act on its own behalf and is usually operating under
charter or instruction from the local democratic institution that established it and oversees it.
9|Page
2. Owner/Seller/Landlord and Buyer/Tenant: These entities may be human/natural persons, as in you and
me; or they may equally be legal persons (companies, governments, investors, trustees etc.).
3. Realtor/Real Estate Agent: Help sellers and buyers, landlords and tenants agree terms over buying and
selling property and in renting.
4. Bank or Finance Provider: The legal entity in the context of a land registry and one of its main
users/consumers. They are often the legal ‘owner’ of the title of a piece of real estate.
5. Surveyor: The surveyor, as an independent quality assurance entity, operates as a neutral and expert
actor in the land registry.
6. Local Government: The ultimate owner of the land registry. Without local government involvement, most
land registries would not work properly.
Types of Common or Frequent Real Estate, Land/Property Scenarios that are found in Land Registry:
● Scenario 1: Administering Existing Plots of Land
The majority of land registry scenarios/cases relate to the administration of existing plots of land, property or
real estate. Existing plots of land come with legacy documentation on paper, a potentially detailed transaction,
debt, tenancy and tax history, and a requirement for expert oversight for the resolution of complex updates
and contentious matters.
● Scenario 2: Setting Up and Administering New Builds
Property developers work with land registries for new-build development. Whatever the designs are put
forward, and regardless of the granting of permission by the local authorities and/or the success of the project,
the land registry will keep careful records of the plans proposed in its database for future reference. Should
the new-build project go forward to completion, then the new plots of land will also need to be fully
established in the land registry and maintained.
● Scenario 3: Large-scale Infrastructure Projects
New roads, railways, bridges, airports and urban developments require intensive use of a land registry, not
only for mandatory purchase, clearance and demolition. Major infrastructure work includes redevelopment
of sites, the design and approval of plots of land and (often) disputes.
Models:
1. Land Registry Model
The example here is the United Kingdom’s ‘HM Land Registry’ agency:
HM Land Registry registers the ownership of property. It guarantees title to registered estates and
interests in land. It records the ownership rights of freehold properties, and leasehold properties where the
lease has been granted for a term exceeding seven years.
The definition of land can include the buildings situated upon the land, particularly where parts of
buildings at different levels are in different ownership. It is also possible to register the ownership of the mines
and minerals which lie within the ground, as well as airspace above property where this is in separate
ownership.
2. Federal Cadastre Model
The example here is the German cadastral system:
10 | P a g e
This land registration system contains all rights of ownership and other rights on land and buildings. By
establishing this system, the importance of a good working cadastral system grew very fast. The description
of the land parcels became the official and legal register of parcels as a part of the land register. Cadastre
developed from a system for taxation of land to a register that gives guarantee to the right of land tenure.
Central Bank - A national bank that provides financial and banking services for its country’s government and commercial
banking system, as well as implementing the government’s monetary policy and issuing currency.
Central Bank Functional Areas:
1. Treasury - formal department of government that deals with national, federal, devolved/state and regional
financial policy and economic strategy.
2. The Mint - central bank entity tasked with the responsibility of printing and managing the national currency.
3. The Banking Regulator - delegated to the central bank given its proximity to the banking activity in general and
its direct/market relationship with the participant banks themselves.
11 | P a g e
4. Payment Processing and Settlement - core responsibility of central banking, both in terms of domestic
payments/settlement and foreign exchange and international settlement.
5. Access to Central Bank - focused on wholesale actors. In a decentralized world, such as blockchain-powered
(tokenized) fiat currencies, there is the further potential to offer all currency holders a permissioned central bank
account.
Key Principal Legal Entities
1. Central Bank
2. Payment Clearance
3. Economic Oversight
4. Banking System Regulator
5. Government
Actors In the Central Bank Stack
1. Central Banker
2. Regulator
3. Cashier
4. Auditor
Central Bank Software
Real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems are specialist funds [cash] transfer systems where the transfer of money or
securities takes place from one bank to any other bank on a ‘real time’ and on a ‘gross’ basis.
● Settlement in ‘real time’ means a payment transaction is not subjected to any waiting period, with transactions
being settled as soon as they are processed.
● ‘Gross settlement’ means the transaction is settled on a one-to-one basis without bundling or netting with any
other transaction. ‘
● In the United Kingdom, for example, the RTGS system is further defined by the two main functional or payment
‘pipes’ travelling through it:
o CHAPS (Clearing House Automated Payment System) - cash-to-cash and the UK’s high-value settlement
system
o CREST (Certificateless Registry for Electronic Share Transfer) - cash-to-equity, the UK’s securities
settlement system
Central Bank Challenges
Challenge 1: Less Cash, But More Digital Cash
How will central banks deploy ‘stable coins’ in a way that fits consumer requirements without sacrificing control
over currency and economic targets and policy, for example.
Challenge 2: Financial Inclusion
If a central bank currency is only available digitally, and/ or via a phone, then those vulnerable or already- excluded
consumers might suffer again from lack of access and see a second, more serious, financial exclusion.
Challenge 3: Tokenization
The challenge for central banks will be to maintain their ability to oversee and regulate these tokenized markets.
On one hand, for example, there is the likelihood that central banks themselves will continue in their role of ‘platform’ for
payment, settlement and reconciliation.
Caselet 1: ‘A Day in the Life of Pounds Sterling’
12 | P a g e
Benefits of Blockchain in Central Bank:
● Less liquidity required to be held internally by ‘retail banks’
● Less capital adequacy required to be held at the central bank by participating banks and other financial
institutions
● Immediate reporting and money supply updates by the central bank
● Greater transparency between payment counterparties and faster gross settlement.
I. Chapter Overview
The Mutual Fund
● A mutual fund is a legal vehicle for pooled investments, from a range of subscribers, managed by a professional
fund manager and whose stated goal is to grow the capital and income offered by the fund for the benefit of its
subscribers
● Mutual funds may be either ‘active’ or ‘passive’. An active fund is typically more expensive than a passive fund as
it is looked after dynamically by a professional human fund manager who is qualified as a professional investor. A
passive fund also sometimes referred to as an ‘index’ fund is algorithmic in design and tends to ‘track’ a specific
market or sector of one or more global economies.
● There is significant debate over the merits and demerits of active vs. passive funds:
In 2007, Warren Buffett made a bet against hedge-fund manager Ted Seides that a simple S&P 500 index (passive
fund) would outperform a basket of at least five hedge (active funds) over the course of a decade. The bet’s time frame
started in January 2008 and concluded at the end of 2017. In 2018 Buffett is the winner.
Mutual fund management is a service industry dedicated to investing, managing and administering the life savings and
retirement investments of the world’s consumers and savers.
13 | P a g e
● Fund management is a narrow and deep practice, meaning that a fund will typically restrict itself to a certain range
of underlying investments or to seeking a specific outcome for its subscribers.
14 | P a g e
● Money-market mutual fund transactions follow special rules. That allows shareholders to use money-market
mutual funds as sweep options for brokerage accounts without having to wait an extra day to clear purchases and
sales.
Key Fund Management Concepts. Including Legal Entities, Actors, Types, Model, Stress, and Challenges
1. Legal Entities
The Fund Manager- managing a fund vehicle and the professional human being who is employed by that firm to specifically
manage an individual fund.
The Fund- A fund is a limited liability company.
The Fund Shareholder/Unitholder- are entitled to share in the profits of the fund and their rights and responsibilities are
usually set out in the fund’s various legal documents.
The Underlying - The range of securities is collectively referred to as the ‘underlying investments’.
The Investment Manager- oversees the selection, distribution, risk assessment and portfolio construction of the
underlying investments in the fund.
The Custodian- The role of the custodian is to hold the underlying investments, in electronic form, in the event that the
fund and/or the fund manager becomes insolvent.
The Bank- Banks are the custodians of the cash in the fund (mirroring the role of the custodian, which has custody of the
securities in the fund).
3. Types
Scenario 1 – Net Asset Value (NAV)
Most funds calculate and publish a daily net asset value (NAV) valuation of their combined cash and underlying
investments, and use this NAV to further calculate the number of shares or units in issue and their (daily) price.
NAVs can be both time-consuming and complex to administer and calculate.
Scenario 2 – Fund Rebalancing
Fund rebalancing is the process of administering the make-up of a fund’s underlying investments, based on factors such
as risk, market volatility, in-house investment philosophy and analysis.
Fund rebalancing can be fraught with challenges, such as in-flight share and unit transactions (and underlying transactions)
and transfers, market volatility, fees and charges, and liquidity.
Scenario 3 – Corporate Action
A fund corporate action requires approval and legal consensus to be achieved by the fund manager from the various share-
and unitholders of the fund.
Collecting and validating the approval or rejection for a specific corporate action from the share- and unitholders in the
fund is a formal requirement for fund managers and takes significant time, effort, resources and costs to complete.
4. Models
Model 1 – Active Fund Management
15 | P a g e
Active fund managers predominate in part due to the desire of fund share- or unitholders to ‘delegate’ the management
of the underlying and the overall investment strategy to a professionally qualified and regulated fund manager.
Model 2 – Passive Fund Management
Passive fund management, by and large, is more mechanically simple and less complex than the people, processes and
technology required for active fund management. Retail consumers, in particular, feel an affinity with passive funds as
they are transparent and easy to understand.
6. Challenges
Challenge 1
● ‘Cost-to-serve’ ratios, i.e. the costs faced by financial advisers who typically recommend and therefore distribute
mutual funds to their wealthy clients, are relatively high.
✔ This is a function of the underlying lack of process automation in financial and wealth advisory firms, which can
often see the most expensive and time-poor staff, the qualified and regulated advisers themselves, occupied with
more mundane tasks such as assisting prospective and existing clients with onerous paperwork.
✔ The obvious solution to the problem (process automation) looks some way off as the main platforms supporting
the distribution of financial advice and fund portfolios are expensive, cumbersome and in a dominant position due
to immature competition and regulatory pressures.
Challenge 2
● Fund management is a highly regulated industry with a range of evergreen and new regulatory and thematic
reviews constantly threatening the more profitable parts of the fund management business.
✔ Commission, high annual management charges, opaque ‘platform’ charges and recurring ancillary revenues
have all either been reduced or are in review by national and supranational government agencies and
regulators.
Challenge 3
● Incumbents in the fund management industry appear, in the minds of challenger entrepreneurs and investors, to
be complacent, inefficient and ripe for disruption.
✔ Not all traditional fund managers are dinosaurs; and not all new entrants are nimble and profitable either.
With the arrival of fashionable financial technology entrants, fund management seems to be seeing a real
wave of change with optionality for retail and institutional clients alike.
USE CASES
Caselet 1: ‘The NAV is Wrong – Often’
Current state: In the current state, Hardwood Funds are struggling to get the NAV for its funds accurate on a monthly
basis, meaning, on certain days in the month, the fund failed to publish the required NAV by the published time each day,
in this case, 12 noon. The share and unitholder must wait until the next working day for the correct price and NAV to be
disseminated. This causes non-trivial issues such as performance calculation issues, reconciliation breaches and client care
and conduct issues for distributors.
Future state: Hardwood models a new Ethereum-powered decentralized ledger as the new core database and smart
contract of the fund’s NAV and other administration functions. By the use of blockchain all data derived from daily
calculation of new cash and instrument holdings within the fund are recorded within the Hardwood nodes. The outcome
16 | P a g e
of this work is to streamline the Hardwood fund NAV calculation in a smart-contract framework. The new NAV process is
fast, efficient and mechanical, and is derived from immutable data from the previous cumulative periods.
CHALLENGES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK OF SUPPLY CHAIN WITH BLOCKCHAIN AND ERP
● ERP and blockchain can be integrated to connect individual ERP systems to the blockchain for better supply
chain management.
● The future of the supply chain is one where blockchain can track activity beyond an enterprise's boundaries.
● Challenges in adopting blockchain for supply chains include infrastructure and network, interoperability, on-
boarding and maintenance costs, data storage costs on blockchain, data validation latency, payload size
restriction, regulatory and legal acceptance, and trust.
● Cost, network infrastructure, and legal aspects are the key challenges.
● Data security is also a concern as data is shared outside the enterprise.
● Challenges may change over time as technology and laws evolve, and new challenges may arise.
Private Blockchains on the other hand are trusted (meaning that users need to know and trust the human-based network
provider and counterparties (individuals, companies, and governments)), and permissioned (meaning that users are
known and credentialed)
18 | P a g e
These two factors, the real-time transactability of all assets on Blockchain systems and the real-time information climate
about network activity (magnitude and type, not specific details), work together to produce a new class of trust which we
term algorithmic trust.
Algorithmic trust is not the computerized instantiation of trust between human parties, but a new concept of trust that
emanates from the use of the computational system as a replacement for traditional mechanisms of governance, control,
and interaction.
Cryptographic Identities
The users of Blockchain transaction networks are cryptographic identities, a notion which is conceptually analogous to an
email address. For email, you have your address, and to access it you need a password. Similarly, with a cryptographic
identity, your public key is like your email address and your private key is like your password. The cryptographic identity
means that only you can make and sign transactions, which is how your account is kept secure on the public ledger and
cannot be accessed and controlled by other parties.
In Blockchain networks, the three main kinds of consensus algorithms for arriving at consensus in a distributed manner
are Proof of Work (POW), Proof of Stake (POS), and Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT).
In POW consensus, the algorithms that operate the distributed system reward miners (client machines on the system)
who solve mathematical problems.
In POS, the consensus algorithm is instead based on owning a stake in the network. In POS systems, the creator of a new
block is chosen in a deterministic way, depending on its stake, or degree of commitment (wealth) in the network.
PFBTis the ability of a distributed computing system to operate irrespective of faulty nodes (malicious or otherwise). PBFT
relies on there being a diversity of participants on the distributed system (a few hundred). For each block of transactions,
algorithms randomly select a small, one-time group of users in a safe and fair way. To protect them from attackers, the
identities of these users are usually hidden until the block is confirmed. The size of this group typically remains constant
as the network grows.
Corda From R3
On the Corda platform, the ledger is distributed on a need-to-know basis, as opposed to a global broadcast method. This
means that only the parties involved in transactions have visibility into these transaction details. The Corda platform
enables businesses to reduce friction, costs and risks in their interactions with other parties, particularly in complex multi-
party transactions such as those found in finance, healthcare and supply chain management.
20 | P a g e
Ethereum Quorum
Quorum is an enterprise-focused version of Ethereum. Quorum is a private Blockchain enterprise-ready distributed ledger
and smart contract platform. Quorum is good for any application requiring high speed and high throughput for the
processing of private transactions within a permissioned group of known participants (for example, a group of investment
banks). It was developed by J.P. Morgan. Quorum has several features: privacy, scalability, and modular.
Hyperledger Fabric
Hyperledger Fabric is a Blockchain framework implementation hosted by the Linux Foundation. Hyperledger Fabric is
designed for use in enterprise-level applications, and it is characterized by its modular architecture, permissioned network,
and smart contract functionality, known as “chaincode”. The platform provides a high degree of security, privacy, and
scalability, and it supports the development of custom blockchain solutions for various use cases across industries such as
finance, supply chain, and healthcare.
Ripple
Ripple is a technology company that provides a global payment network and a cryptocurrency called XRP. Ripple's
blockchain technology is designed to facilitate fast, secure, and low-cost transactions between financial institutions.
Ripple's private blockchain is a closed, permissioned blockchain that is designed for use by financial institutions and
payment providers. In Ripple's private blockchain, only approved parties are allowed to validate transactions and add
blocks to the chain. This creates a more centralized system, which allows for faster transaction times and lower costs
compared to public blockchains.
4.5 Ripple
The name Ripple refers to rippling, the idea that transactions ripple, or flow automatically across open nodes in the
network to their destination. A central premise of Ripple is that transactions can automatically ripple across the
network, crediting and debiting intermediary wallet nodes without requiring human intervention.
o Ripple is a real-time gross settlement system, currency exchange, and remittance network initially released in
2012. Ripple is a payment protocol that uses blockchain technology to process international money transfers. It
offers low transaction fees and extremely fast processing times, and it has partnered with hundreds of financial
institutions that use its technology.
o It handles both immediate cash payments and credit transactions over time.
o Its main goal is to eliminate the need for older systems like Western Union or Swift. Ripple is different from
other cryptocurrency projects such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Monero in that it targets financial institutions, and
might possibly be a successor to SWIFT.
22 | P a g e
idea of contractually obligating an asset tracking consumption of a resource against the escrow, and then settling on a
net basis in one transaction at the end of the period.
6.8 Use Case: Higher Education and the Scientific Research Process
The lengthy processes of preparing, submitting, and approving grants could be streamlined with digital identity
confirmation and smart contract orchestration by Blockchains. In academia there is considerable interest in using
Blockchain technologies in the context of higher education and research institutions. Blockchain technologies might be
used to improve and reinvest how universities conduct their operations, and themselves be the object of study, both in
scientific and humanities fields.
23 | P a g e