Internet addiction is characterized by excessive online usage, often leading to disrupted sleep patterns and impaired academic or occupational performance. The Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire (IADQ) assesses dependency through a series of questions, with individuals considered dependent if they affirm five or more. Cultural norms may mask the negative impacts of excessive Internet use, making it crucial to evaluate the detrimental effects rather than just the amount of time spent online.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
0 views
2
Internet addiction is characterized by excessive online usage, often leading to disrupted sleep patterns and impaired academic or occupational performance. The Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire (IADQ) assesses dependency through a series of questions, with individuals considered dependent if they affirm five or more. Cultural norms may mask the negative impacts of excessive Internet use, making it crucial to evaluate the detrimental effects rather than just the amount of time spent online.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
While diagnosing Internet addiction is not a direct function of time spent using the
Internet, early studies suggested that those classified as dependent or addicted
online users were generally excessive about their online usage, spending anywhere from forty to eighty hours per week using the Internet, with sessions that could last up to twenty hours (Young, 1998, Greenfield 1999). Sleep patterns were disrupted due to late night log-ins; addicts generally stayed up surfing until late in the night, with the reality of having to wake up early for work or school. In extreme cases, caffeine pills were used to facilitate longer Internet sessions. Such sleep deprivation caused excessive fatigue, impairing academic or occupational performance that also increased the risk of poor diet and exercise. Researchers have likened Internet addiction to addictive syndromes similar to impulse-control disorders on the Axis I Scale in the DSM and utilized various forms of DSM-IV based criteria to define Internet addiction. Of all the references in the DSM, Pathological Gambling was viewed as most akin to this phenomenon. The Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire (IADQ) was developed as an initial screening instrument utilized for diagnosis (Young, 1998). The following questionnaire conceptualized patterns associated with Internet Addiction Disorder: Young- Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire 1. Do you feel preoccupied with the Internet (think about previous online activity or anticipate next online session)? 2. Do you feel the need to use the Internet with increasing amounts of time in order to achieve satisfaction? 3. Have you repeatedly made unsuccessful efforts to control, cut back, or stop Internet use? 4. Do you feel restless, moody, depressed, or irritable when attempting to cut down or stop Internet use? 5. Do you stay online longer than originally intended? 6. Have you jeopardized or risked the loss of significant relationship, job, educational or career opportunity because of the Internet? 7. Have you lied to family members, therapist, or others to conceal the extent of involvement with the Internet? 8. Do you use the Internet as a way of escaping from problems or of relieving a dysphoric mood (e.g., feelings of helplessness, guilt, anxiety, depression)? Figure 1 Young- Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire Test-takers were to consider non-essential computer/Internet usage, such as for non-business or non-academically related use, over a six-month period. Subjects were considered ‘dependent’ when endorsing five or more of the questions and at-risk for dependence when endorsing 3 – 4 questions (Durkee et al., 2012). The IADQ was used in research examining prevalence of Internet addiction across cultures. Researchers found The Internet Addiction Test 9 Cronbach alpha measures of internal consistency of between .60 (Li, O’Brien, Snyder, & Howard, 2001) and .72 (Dowling & Quirk, 2009) Associated features of Internet addiction, beyond those included in the IADQ, include regular excessive Internet use, neglect of routine duties or life responsibilities, social isolation, and being secretive about online activities, or suddenly demanding privacy from friends or family when online. While the IADQ provides a means to conceptualize pathological or addictive use of the Internet, these warning signs can often be masked by cultural norms that encourage and reinforce online use. Even if a client meets all the criteria, signs of abuse can be rationalized as, “I need this for my job” or “It’s just a machine” when in reality the Internet is causing significant problems in a user’s life. Thus, evaluations which focus on the negative impact Internet use is causing to the user are more indicative of problematic use than those that focus strictly on overall Internet use.