Computational Techniques for Process Simulation and Analysis Using MATLAB® 1st Edition Niket S. Kaisare - The complete ebook set is ready for download today
Computational Techniques for Process Simulation and Analysis Using MATLAB® 1st Edition Niket S. Kaisare - The complete ebook set is ready for download today
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/computational-techniques-
for-process-simulation-and-analysis-using-matlab-1st-
edition-niket-s-kaisare/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD EBOOK
https://textbookfull.com/product/numerical-methods-for-engineers-and-
scientists-using-matlab-ramin-s-esfandiari/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/network-modeling-simulation-and-
analysis-in-matlab-theory-and-practices-dac-nhuong-le/
textbookfull.com
Chemical thermodynamics for process simulation Gmehling
https://textbookfull.com/product/chemical-thermodynamics-for-process-
simulation-gmehling/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/signals-and-systems-analysis-using-
transform-methods-and-matlab-third-edition-michael-j-roberts/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/power-system-transient-analysis-
theory-and-practice-using-simulation-programs-atp-emtp-1st-edition-
arai/
textbookfull.com
Computational Techniques for
Process Simulation and Analysis
Using MATLAB®
Computational Techniques for
Process Simulation and Analysis
Using MATLAB®
Niket S. Kaisare
MATLAB ® is a trademark of The MathWorks, Inc. and is used with permission. The MathWorks does not warrant the accuracy
of the text or exercises in this book. This book’s use or discussion of MATLAB ® software or related products does not constitute
endorsement or sponsorship by The MathWorks of a particular pedagogical approach or particular use of the MATLAB ® software.
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group,
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300,
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to pub-
lish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the
consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in
this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright
material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any
form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming,
and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.
copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400.
CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been
granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification
and explanation without intent to infringe.
Preface, xix
Author, xxiii
vii
viii ◾ Contents
Chapter 7 ◾ Special Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations 273
7.1 GENERAL SETUP 273
7.1.1 Ordinary Differential Equation–Boundary Value Problems 274
7.1.2 Elliptic PDEs 274
7.1.3 Outlook of This Chapter 275
7.2 TRIDIAGONAL AND BANDED SYSTEMS 275
7.2.1 What Is a Banded System? 275
7.2.1.1 Tridiagonal Matrix 276
7.2.2 Thomas Algorithm a.k.a TDMA 276
7.2.2.1 Heat Conduction Problem 277
7.2.2.2 Thomas Algorithm 281
7.2.3 ODE-BVP with Flux Specified at Boundary 285
7.2.4 Extension to Banded Systems 288
7.2.5 Elliptic PDEs in Two Dimensions 289
7.3 ITERATIVE METHODS 290
7.3.1 Gauss-Siedel Method 291
7.3.2 Iterative Method with Under-Relaxation 295
7.4 NONLINEAR BANDED SYSTEMS 296
7.4.1 Nonlinear ODE-BVP Example 296
7.4.1.1 Heat Conduction with Radiative Heat Loss 297
7.4.2 Modified Successive Linearization–Based Approach 298
7.4.3 Gauss-Siedel with Linearization of Source Term 302
7.4.4 Using fsolve with Sparse Systems 304
7.5 EXAMPLES 304
7.5.1 Heat Conduction with Convective or Radiative Losses 304
7.5.2 Diffusion and Reaction in a Catalyst Pellet 305
xiv ◾ Contents
BIBLIOGRAPHY, 527
INDEX, 529
Preface
S tudents today are expected to know one or more of the several computing or simu-
lation tools as part of their curriculum, due to their widespread use in the industry.
MATLAB® has become one of the prominent languages used in research and industry.
MATLAB is a numerical computing environment that is based on a MATLAB scripting
language. MathWorks, the makers of MATLAB, describe it as “the language of technical
computing.” The focus of this book will be to highlight the use of MATLAB in technical
computing or, more specifically, in solving problems in the analysis and simulation of pro-
cesses of interest to engineers.
This is intended to be an intermediate-level book, geared toward postgraduate students,
practicing engineers, and researchers who use MATLAB. It provides advanced treatment
of topics relevant to modeling, simulation, and analysis of dynamical systems. Although
this is not an introductory MATLAB or numerical techniques textbook, it may however
be used as a companion book for introductory courses. For the sake of completeness, a
primer on MATLAB as well as introduction to some numerical techniques is provided in
the Appendices. Since mid-2000s,we have always used MATLAB in electives in IIT Madras.
The popularity of MATLAB among students led us to start a core undergraduate (sopho-
more) and a postgraduate (first-year masters) laboratory. Since 2016, I have started teach-
ing a massive open online course (MOOC) on MATLAB programming on the NPTEL
platform.* The first two years of this course had over 10,000 enrolled students. Needless to
say, MATLAB has become an important tool in teaching and research. The focus of all the
above courses is to introduce students to MATLAB as a numerical methods tool. Some of
the students who complete these courses inquire about the next-level courses that would
help them apply MATLAB skills to solve engineering problems. This book may also be used
for this purpose. In introductory courses, a significant amount of time is spent in develop-
ing the background for numerical methods itself. In our effort to make the treatment gen-
eral and at a beginner’s level, we eschew real-world examples in favor of abstracted ones.
For example, we would often introduce a second-order ODE using a generic formulation,
such as y″ + ay′ + b(y − c) = 0. A sophomore who hasn’t taken a heat transfer course may
not yet appreciate a “heating in a rod” problem. An intermediate-level text means that it
is more valuable to use a real example, such as T″ + r−1T′ + β(T − Ta) = 0. The utility of such
* NPTEL stands for National Programme for Technology Enhanced Learning and is a Government of India−funded initiative
to bring high-quality engineering and science courses on an online (MOOC) platform to enhance students’ learning.
xix
xx ◾ Preface
an approach cannot be understated, since it allows the freedom to introduce some of the
complexity that engineers, scientists, and researchers face in their work.
The value of using real-world examples was highlighted during my experience in indus-
trial R&D, where we used MATLAB extensively. We needed to interface with cross-func-
tional teams: engineering, implementation, and software development teams. Individuals
came from a wide range of backgrounds. These interactions exposed me to a new experi-
ence: Your work must be understood by people with very different backgrounds, who may
not speak the same technical language. The codes had to bridge the “language barrier”
spoken in different teams, and the codes were to be combined with a reasonably intuitive
interface. I have tried to adopt some of these principles in this book, without moving too far
from the more common pedagogy in creating such a book.
Thus, a practically oriented text that caters to an intermediate-level audience is my objec-
tive in writing this book.
systems. The “process” is the focus. Numerical methods are introduced insofar as is essen-
tial to make a judicious choice of algorithms for simulation and analysis.
PREREQUISITES
Since this is a postgraduate-level text, some familiarity with an undergraduate-level
numerical techniques or an equivalent course is assumed, though we will review all the
relevant concepts at the appropriate stage. So, the students are not expected to remem-
ber the details or nuances of “Newton-Raphson” or “Runge-Kutta” methods, but this
book is not the first time they hear these terms.
Some familiarity with coding (MATLAB, Fortran, C++, Python, or any language)
will be useful, but not a prerequisite. MATLAB primer is provided in the Appendix for
first-time users of MATLAB. Finally, with respect to writing MATLAB code, I focus on
“doing it right the first time” approach—by bringing in good programming practices
that I have learnt over the years. Things like commenting and structuring your code,
scoping of variables, etc., are also covered, not as an afterthought but as an integral part
of the discussion. However, these are dealt with more informally than a “programming
language” course.
xxiii
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
1.1 OVERVIEW
1.1.1 A General Model
This book is targeted toward postgraduate students, senior undergraduates, researchers, and
practicing engineers to provide them with a practical guide for using MATLAB® for process
simulation and numerical analysis. MATLAB was listed among the top ten programming
languages by the IEEE Spectrum magazine in 2015 (a list that was topped by Java, followed by
C and C++). While the basics of MATLAB can be learnt through various sources, the focus
of this book is on the analysis and simulation of processes of interest to engineers.
The terms “analysis” and “simulation” are generic terms that define a rather broad spectrum
of problems and solution techniques. Engineering is a discipline that deals with the transfor-
mation of raw material, momentum, or energy. Thus, this book will focus on those process
examples where the variables of interest vary with time and/or space, including the relationship
of these state variables with their properties. I will use an example of a reactor-separator process
in Section 1.1.2 to illustrate this. While this is a chemical engineering example, the treatment in
this book is general enough for other engineering and science disciplines to also find it useful.
The problems mentioned above that are considered in this book include ordinary and
partial differential equations (ODEs and PDEs), algebraic equations (either linear or non-
linear), or combinations thereof. The three sections of this book are organized based on the
computational methodology and analysis tools that will be used for the respective problems.
Section I of this book includes Chapters 2 through 5 and deals with ODE-IVPs (initial
value problems) as well as the problems that can be converted into a standard form that can
be solved with ODE-IVP tools. A generic ODE-IVP is of the type
dy
= f ( t ,y ;f
f) (1.1)
dt
where
t is an independent variable
y ∈ R n is a vector of dependent variables
ϕ represents parameters
1
2 ◾ Computational Techniques for Process Simulation and Analysis Using MATLAB®
0 = g ( x;f
f) (1.2)
where
x ∈ R m is a vector of dependent variables
ϕ represents parameters
Nonlinear algebraic equations, such as Equation 1.2, fall under this category. Moreover,
ODE-BVPs (boundary value problems) and several PDEs are also converted into the form
of Equation 1.2. Section II will not only cover techniques to solve algebraic equations but
also expound methods to convert ODEs/PDEs to this form. A combination of Equations 1.1
and 1.2, called differential algebraic equations (DAEs), is covered in Chapter 8. Chapters 5
and 9 are the concluding chapters of the first two sections. They build on the concepts from
the preceding chapters in the respective sections for the analysis of dynamical systems and
provide an introduction to advanced topics in simulations.
Finally, Chapter 10, included in Section III, deals with the parameter estimation prob-
lem, that is, to compute the parameter vector, ϕ, that best fits the experimental data.
dx A
F = -r ( x A ) , x A V =0 = xin (1.3)
dV
Ffeed Fr, xr P, xp
D, xD Purge
Fin, xin
F, xf
F, xf
B, xB
FIGURE 1.1 A typical process consisting of a reactor and a separator, with a recycle.
Introduction ◾ 3
The reactor outlet conditions are obtained by solving the ODE-IVP above. ODE-IVP prob-
lems are covered in Chapter 3 of this book. If a dynamic response of the PFR is required,
the resulting model is a PDE, where the state variable of interest varies in both space and
time. Solutions to transient PDEs are covered in Chapter 4. Advanced topics in simulation
are presented in Chapter 5, for example, when the inlet conditions or model parameters
vary with time and/or space.
The distillation column consists of N nonlinear algebraic equations in N unknowns (mole
fractions on each tray). For example, one of the model equations for the kth tray is given by
ax i
0 = ( Li -1 xi -1 - Li xi ) + (Vi +1 yi +1 - Vi yi ) where yi = (1.4)
1 + ( a - 1) xi
Such balance equations are written for each ideal stage of the distillation column, resulting
in N nonlinear algebraic equations that need to be solved simultaneously to obtain N vari-
ables. These are further discussed in Chapter 6.
Axial dispersion is neglected while deriving the model (Equation 1.3). Inclusion of the
axial dispersion term converts this IVP to a BVP, which is covered in Chapter 7. Discretizing
the ODE-BVP results in a set of equations with a special matrix structure. Mass transfer
limitations result in DAEs, which are covered in Chapter 8.
MATLAB is instead provided in Appendix A. This book follows the principle of “learn it
right the first time.” Good programming hygiene, in writing MATLAB codes, is evange-
lized and implemented right from the first example. The book follows another principle
that the best way to learn programming is through extensive practice. MathWorks, the
parent company that develops MATLAB, has good introductory video tutorials, available
at: http://in.mathworks.com/products/matlab/videos.html.* A beginner may want to start
with their “Getting Started” videos.† I also have an introductory MOOC course on using
MATLAB for numerical computations on National Programme for Technology Enhanced
Learning.‡
Figure 1.2 shows a screenshot of MATLAB window. The main section contains two
windows: MATLAB editor at the top and MATLAB command window at the bottom. The
MATLAB editor currently shows the MATLAB file firstFlowSheet.m, which is a
“driver script” to simulate the reactor-separator flow sheet described above. Line number
13 shows the following statement:
[F,x,err] = solveFlowSheet(Ffeed,Vpfr,purge,initVal);
Language: English
BY
REV. EDWARD HOARE,
INCUMBENT OF TRINITY CHURCH, TUNBRIDGE WELLS.
LONDON:
HATCHARD AND CO. 187 PICCADILLY,
Booksellers to H. R. H. the Princess of Wales
and the Royal Family.
1866.
LONDON:
Strangeways and Walden, Printers,
28 Castle St. Leicester Sq.
TRANSUBSTANTIATION.
Heb. x. 12.
“But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for
ever, sat down on the right hand of God.”
Heb. x. 12.
“But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for
ever, sat down on the right hand of God.”
When I drew your attention to this text on Sunday last, I pointed out
the two great subjects contained in it, viz. the work of atonement
completed by our blessed Lord on earth, and His present session at
the right hand of God. The latter of these we studied on Sunday
last, but the former is of such vast importance to every one of us
that it would be wrong to leave the passage without devoting this
morning to the careful examination of it.
The text stands very near the conclusion of a most important
argument, in which the Apostle has been drawing the contrast
between the Jewish sacrifices under the ceremonial law and the one
perfect sacrifice wrought out for us by the Son of God on the cross.
The contrast commences with the 25th verse of the 9th chapter, and
extends to the 14th verse of the 10th; after which we are led to the
practical application of the whole epistle. Let us, then, first, carefully
study the point of contrast, and then the reason of it.
I. The contrast.
The one point brought out in these eighteen verses is, that in the
case of the Jewish sacrifices there was unceasing repetition; and in
the case of our blessed Lord, His one offering was once and for ever.
It is scarcely needful to point out the unceasing repetition of the
Jewish sacrifices. Not only were they offered on the occasion of
every special fault, but every period of time was marked by them.
The day, the week, the month, the year—each had its appointed
sacrifice. Not a day, nor even a night, passed without sin, and
therefore there was a sacrifice each morning for the sins of the
night, and another each evening for those of the day. (Exod. xxix.
38–40.) Not a week passed without adding its quota to the
accumulating guilt of the sinner, and, therefore, notwithstanding the
daily sacrifices, there was another burnt-offering in the morning of
every sabbath. (Num. xxviii. 9, 10.) But, notwithstanding all this,
sin, and the guilt of it, still gathered around the people, so that at
the beginning of each month there was, in addition, a monthly
burnt-offering unto the Lord: “the burnt-offering of every month
through the months of the year.” (Ibid. 11, 14.) But sin gathered
still. Lamb after lamb was brought to the altar, but it seemed as
though nothing could satisfy: for every year, on the tenth day of the
seventh month, there was the great day of atonement for sin; and of
the solemn sacrifices of that great day it was said, “This shall be an
everlasting statute unto you, to make an atonement for the children
of Israel for all their sins once a-year.” (Lev. xvi. 34.) Thus, day
after day, week after week, month after month, year after year,
there was an unceasing system of perpetual sacrifice. There was no
end to the unceasing shedding of blood. Sometimes the victim was
a bullock, sometimes a ram, sometimes a goat, sometimes a lamb,
and sometimes a pair of turtle-doves. But there was always a
sacrifice. There were two every day, and sometimes many more,
besides those which were offered for special sins.
With all this the Apostle contrasts the one perfect sacrifice of our
blessed Lord, made on the cross once and for ever. There are no
less than six places in which he brings out this one point, and brings
it out with such clearness that it really seems as if the whole
passage was written as a prophetic safeguard against the doctrine of
the mass. In Heb. ix. 25, 26, he says: “Nor yet that he should offer
himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every
year with blood of others; for then must he often have suffered
since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the
world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.”
So in vv. 27, 28, he draws a comparison between the death of the
Lord Jesus and the natural death of man, and says: “As it is
appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: so
Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them
that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto
salvation.” So that it would be just as absurd to expect men to die
twice, as to believe that there can be any second offering of the
Lord Jesus Christ for sin. The one death throughout mankind is the
type or pattern of the one Sacrifice once made for sin. So, again, in
x. 10, we read,—“By the which will we are sanctified through the
offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” And again, in vv,
11, 12, St. Paul returns to the contrast between our Lord and the
Jewish priest, and says, “Every priest standeth daily ministering and
offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away
sins: but this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for
ever, sat down on the right hand of God.” And once more, in ver. 14,
he sums up all by saying, “By one offering He hath perfected for
ever them that are sanctified.” It would be a matter of deep interest
to study carefully the meaning of the word “perfected” in this most
important text. It does not mean perfect in personal holiness, i.e. in
the inward work of the Spirit on the soul; but perfect in justification:
perfect, because the curse was perfectly blotted out, the law being
perfectly satisfied, and the sinner, after propitiation, perfectly free.
But we must not stop to dwell on that now, our one point at present
is that the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus was once, and for ever; and
this is most remarkably brought out in the words,—“By one offering
He hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.”
The point of contrast, therefore, is this, that in the ceremonial law
there was a multitude of sacrifices day by day, and year by year,
repeated; whereas in the new covenant there was but one, and that
one effectual for ever. In the one there was multiplicity, in the other
oneness; in the one unceasing repetition, in the other one final act,
which set the whole at rest for ever. The contrast stands out so
plainly that he may run that readeth it. Nay, more, it is written with
that perfect clearness, and often-repeated statement, that I confess
myself perfectly unable to comprehend how any person, reading
these two chapters, with a real desire to discover the mind of the
Spirit, can arrive at the conclusion that there can be any repetition of
the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ under any form whatever, or
any supplementary work of any kind whatever to complete or fill up
His one perfect sacrifice for sin.
II. Such, then, is the contrast; and now let us turn, in the second
place, to the reason of it. Why were those ancient sacrifices so
often repeated? and why was ours once and for ever? The same
passage that brings out the contrast explains the reason of it; and
the reason is that, in themselves, they have no saving power, and
that ours has. They were ineffectual for the blotting out of sin, but
the one offering of our Blessed Lord was perfectly effectual in the
very point where they failed. There was as great a contrast in
respect of efficiency as there was in respect of frequency; and, in
fact, the repetition was the result of weakness, as the oneness was
the result of complete sufficiency. This insufficiency is placed in two
points of view in the chapter, for we are there taught, first, that
these sacrifices could not take away sin, and, secondly, that they
could not satisfy the conscience.
In x. 3, 4, we are distinctly taught that the one reason why these
sacrifices were repeated was, that it was impossible for them to be
effectual in removing guilt. “In those sacrifices there is a
remembrance again made of sins every year. For it is not possible
that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.” The
dark stain of sin is far too dreadful a thing to be blotted out by the
blood of any animal. Those sacrifices did very well as
remembrancers. They were daily reminders, and daily
acknowledgments of guilt; but as for putting it away, they had no
virtue in them, and they were powerless. They were most important
likewise as types; as helping believers, with the eye of faith, to look
on and trust to the one sufficient sacrifice of the Lord; and so
believers, looking to Christ as represented in the slain lamb, could,
through faith in Him, find pardon and peace to their souls. But in
themselves they were utterly powerless, for nothing short of the
perfect sacrifice of the Son of God could ever really take away sin.
They could never, therefore, satisfy the conscience; as you read,
Heb; x. 1, 2:—“For the law, having a shadow of good things to
come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those
sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the
comers thereunto perfect. For then would they not have ceased to
be offered? because that the worshippers once purged shall have
had no more conscience of sins.”
A man might bring any number of lambs, goats, and bullocks, and
lay them all on the altar; but, unless by the eye of faith he looked to
Christ, he would, after all, carry guilt with him in his conscience; and
the still small voice within would bring him in guilty before God. The
sense of guilt demanded repetition; but unless the heart looked
forward, through that sacrifice, to the coming Christ, no offering,
however often repeated, was sufficient: the conscience remained
uneasy still, and the sense of guilt clung to the soul.
How gloriously different is the one sacrifice of the Son of God! It,
and it alone, was sufficient for all the sins of the whole world. The
substitution of the Son of God for the sinner satisfied the whole law,
and cleared away the whole curse. It not only in God’s counsels
removed the guilt, but it reaches the very depths of the human
heart, and gives peace to the conscience wounded for sin. Observe
the words in ix. 13, 14, as contrasted with those in x. 2. In x. 2 we
are taught, that if those sacrifices could have purged the conscience,
they would have ceased. But in ix. 14 we read, that through the
sacrifice of our blessed Lord, this very thing is done; for the Apostle
says:—“How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the
Eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, purge your
conscience from dead works to serve the living God?” The one
sacrifice was effective to purge the conscience; while all the whole
multitude of often-repeated offerings left the conscience just where
it was; without rest, without peace, without any real satisfaction,
under the painful pressure of a deeply-felt sin. Let us never forget
this great result; for it shows that we have that which the Jew, in his
sacrifices taken alone, could never have—a conscience at rest, a
conscience set free, because all sin is blotted out for ever; a
conscience released from its burden, because the Lord Jesus Christ,
the Son of God, was a divinely-appointed substitute for guilt.
Such, then, is the contrast, and such the reason for it. What, then,
are we to think of the teaching of the Church of Rome when it says,
—“In this divine sacrifice which is performed in the Mass, that same
Christ is contained, and sacrificed without blood, who once, with
blood, offered Himself upon the altar of the Cross?” [27] And again:
—“If any man shall say that the sacrifice is not propitiatory, and
profits the receiver only, and ought not to be offered for the living
and the dead, for sins, punishments, satisfaction, and other
necessities, let him be anathema?” Now, what do these passages
teach?
1. That the sacramental bread is changed into the Lord Jesus Christ,
the Living Saviour, God and man.
2. That whenever the Mass is administered, He, the living Saviour, is
again sacrificed and put to death.
3. That this sacrifice is a sacrifice of propitiation for sin. There is a
sacrifice of self-dedication, which every loving heart is required to
offer: as in the words after the Lord’s Supper,—“Here we offer and
present unto Thee ourselves, out souls and bodies, to be a
reasonable, holy, and lively sacrifice unto Thee.” But in that case the
offering is ourselves, and the motive is not propitiation, but
dedication. According to the teaching of Rome the offering is the
Lord Jesus Christ, and the object is to make a propitiation for sin.
Now, this is the doctrine that persons are striving to reintroduce into
our land and church. The real object of this modern movement is to
re-establish the belief in transubstantiation and propitiatory
sacrifice. Those vestments of which we have heard so much are not
introduced simply from a love of ornament and decoration, but they
are folds in which to wrap the doctrine of the Mass; and that
doctrine, as I have just stated it, is, that the bread is first changed
into a living Saviour, and then the living Saviour offered afresh as a
propitiation for sin. [29]
Now, such a doctrine seems to me so utterly contrary to all that we
are taught in the Scriptures respecting the perfection and
consequent oneness of the one offering of our Blessed Lord upon
the Cross, that I am utterly unable to comprehend how any person
who takes the Scriptures as their authority can, by any process of
mind, be brought to believe it. As I have already said, these
chapters seem to have been written with a prophetic reference to it;
and I do not hesitate to express my firm and fixed conviction, that if
we mean to abide by God’s word as our guide, we must protest
against the whole movement. Nor must we allow ourselves to be
led away by the religious feelings of pious and earnest men; or
permit the holy reverence with which, as believing communicants,
we regard the holy communion of the body and blood of Christ, to
induce us to think lightly of a deadly error, even though men make
use of it in order, apparently, to exalt the peculiar sanctity of the
sacrament. We must stand firm to the great principle of Scripture;
the principle for which our martyred Reformers did not hesitate to
shed their life-blood, that the bread is bread, and the wine wine,
after consecration, just as they were before it; that neither the one
nor the other is changed into the Lord Jesus Christ; that the Lord
Jesus Christ is not sacrificed in the sacrament; and that there never
can be, so long as the world lasts, any further sacrifice for sin.
When the Lord Jesus Christ died on the cross, to use the language
of our Church, He “made there (by His one oblation of Himself once
offered) a full, perfect, and sufficient sacrifice, oblation, and
satisfaction, for the sins of the whole world:” and, unless we are
prepared to deny the sufficiency of the one complete atonement, we
must set our face with a holy determination against all ideas of
repetition, or perpetuation, of any propitiatory sacrifice for sin.
But we must not leave the matter there, for it is not enough for us
to be deeply convinced that the doctrine of the Mass is opposed to
the whole truth of God, for such a conviction, though it may keep us
clear of Rome, will not, if it be all, bring us to God. What we want is
not merely a conviction of the truth, but a personal appropriation of
it in our own hearts. It is a blessed thing to know that a perfect
sacrifice has been offered, and that no further sacrifice is either
necessary or possible; but that knowledge, blessed as it is, may
leave the heart dissatisfied, and the conscience ill at ease. When
that is the case, we cannot be surprised at persons restlessly feeling
after anything that promises peace; and I believe there is no state of
mind in which persons are so liable to be led away by Rome, as
when the conscience is awakened, but the heart not at rest in Christ
the Saviour. It is when we can look to that cross of Christ, assured
that the atonement there made was sufficient even for us, and when
we can rest in the conviction that, because the atonement was
sufficient, we, even we, are free; and when we learn to rest, not on
feelings, not on sacraments, not on our doings of any kind whatever,
but simply on the great, grand, glorious fact, that a full propitiation
has been made even for the chief of sinners, so that we, though the
chief of sinners, are no longer under the guilt of sin; then it is that
we discover the strength of the rock under our feet, and, resting on
it, we need no other stay. It is enough, for Christ hath died, and
through Him God is reconciled. Blessed! oh, blessed that Christian
believer, who can thus rest in a perfect Saviour; and be kept in
perfect peace through the Saviour’s perfect work!
SELF-SACRIFICE.
Rom. xii. 1.
“I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that
ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto
God, which is your reasonable service.”
We studied last Sunday the one perfect and final sacrifice made for
the sins of the whole world, when our Lord Jesus Christ completed
our propitiation on the cross. We found that that sacrifice differed
from those of the ceremonial law, in the great fact that it was once
and for ever; that it was so perfect, so complete, so fully sufficient to
satisfy the whole claim of the law, that when it was once offered
there was no place left for repetition, perpetuation, or addition. The
veil of the temple was then rent from the top to the bottom, and
there was no space left for any further rending. The Lord himself
said, “It is finished;” so the whole was done, and done for ever.
But still we read in Scripture of another sacrifice—a sacrifice which
Christian people are called to offer. Thus in this text St. Paul says, “I
beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye
present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable unto God,
which is your reasonable service.” To this appeal the words in our
Communion Service are the Christian’s reply:—“And here we offer
and present unto thee ourselves, our souls and bodies, to be a
reasonable, holy, and living sacrifice unto thee.” It clearly remains,
therefore, for us to examine the character of this second sacrifice,
and also its relationship to the great and perfect sacrifice completed
on the cross for sin. This, then, if God permit, shall be our subject
this morning. May the Lord dispose our hearts to bring to Him this
holy sacrifice, that we, if we live, may live not unto ourselves, but
unto Him “that died for us, and rose again!”
I. What, then, is the nature of the sacrifice? or, What is it we are to
offer? It is not a lamb, or a goat, or a bullock, but, according to the
language of our Communion Service, the offering which we are to
render is ourselves. “Here we offer and present unto thee ourselves,
our souls and bodies.” Just so we read of the churches of
Macedonia, “that they first gave their own selves unto the Lord.” A
moment’s thought will suffice to show that such a sacrifice as this is
much more costly than any other. It would be a light matter to
sacrifice a bullock, but it is a very costly one to sacrifice Self—an
easy thing for the wealthy prince to bring a thousand lambs to the
altar, but a hard thing for either rich or poor to bring his own will to
be crucified with Christ.
But here a question will arise in the minds of all those who really
desire to make this sacrifice to the Lord, viz. What does it practically
involve? What is the real meaning of it? What will be the practical
result of such a sacrifice in our own life and character? Some will
tell us that it involves the necessity of conventual life, a separation
from common duties, and the seclusion of a nunnery, or the vows of
a sisterhood. Let any one read this chapter through, and he will see
at a glance that this is not the meaning of the Apostle. There are no
rules there for a monastic order, but there are very full directions for
common business, and common life. All such ideas, therefore, may
be dismissed at once. That is not the meaning of the sacrifice.
Then, what is? What is the sacrifice which we, living at home, are to
offer to God?
1. There must be the sacrifice of our sins.
In this present world we are in a mixed condition, and however truly
we may be walking with God, there is the old man and the old
nature left. It is just the same with us as it was of old with Canaan.
Israel had taken possession, but the Canaanites were still in the
land. So, even when the Lord Jesus has taken possession of the
heart, there are sins still abiding there—tempers, lusts,
covetousness, selfishness, pride, and a thousand others—some
prevailing in one character and some in another. Now of all these
the Christian man must be prepared to make a sacrifice—his temper,
his pride, his ambition, his covetousness, his self-love; he must be
prepared to bring all to the altar, without mercy and without
reserve. Thus, in Col. iii. 5, St. Paul addresses those who are risen
with Christ, and says, “Mortify therefore,” or put to death, or
sacrifice, “your members which are of the flesh: fornication,
uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and
covetousness, which is idolatry.” There is no occasion to be shut up
within the walls of a nunnery for this; nor will the walls of a nunnery
in the least help us to it, for they are just as effectual in shutting sin
in as in shutting it out. Here is work for home life, and for all classes
in home life—for husbands and wives, parents and children, masters
and servants: we all have our great temptations, so we all have to
throw ourselves heart and soul into the great struggle, and with an
unsparing hand deal resolutely with besetting sin.
2. But the sacrifice goes farther, and involves the dedication of our
powers to the Lord’s most sacred service. The text implies this when
it says, “Present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable
unto God, which is your reasonable service.” There is clearly,
therefore, to be service,—a service involving the active use of human
powers. In some cases the body has been actually surrendered to
bleed, or burn, in martyrdom. Many a noble man of God has given
his body to be burnt rather than acknowledge the doctrine of the
Mass. To this, however, we are not called. But still there may be
sacrifice without martyrdom, dedication without death, and such a
surrender of the living powers as may correspond to the description,
“That they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves,
but unto Him that died for them, and rose again.” This is the secret
of the missionary spirit; this it is which has led some of the noblest
young men in our Universities to abandon all home prospects, and to
devote their whole lives to the great work of proclaiming Christ in
distant lands. This, again, is the spirit that at this present time is
stirring thousands of our own people at home, devoted men and
devoted women, to spend their lives labouring for God, helping the
poor, comforting the afflicted, nursing the sick, and striving in every
possible way to make known the sweetness of the sacred Name
which has brought life and peace to their own souls.
3. Once more: the sacrifice involves the free gift of money. Money
with most men lies very near the heart. Open the heart, and you
open the purse. Let the heart become dull, lifeless, cold, and
unfeeling, and the purse soon closes. Thus the sacrifice of Self is
almost sure to lead to the offering of money. Cold hearts give little;
but when the heart is full the offerings flow freely. The men of
Macedonia were poor people, but no sooner had they given their
own selves to the Lord than “the abundance of their joy, and their
deep poverty, abounded unto the riches of their liberality.” Now
these offerings are described in the Scriptures as a sacrifice to God.
St. Paul alludes to them, in Philip, iv. 18. It is not perfectly clear
whether he alludes to a contribution towards his own maintenance,
or to the collection in which he took so deep an interest for the poor
saints in Jerusalem; but, either way, he describes the offerings as an
odour of a sweet smell, a “sacrifice acceptable, well pleasing to
God.” This gives a delightful view of contributions in a right spirit for
the service of the Lord. It shows that the free and generous giver
thereby offers a sacrifice well pleasing to God. It rebukes at the
same time the niggardly and parsimonious spirit, the spirit that gives
reluctantly, and complains of many calls. Yet I verily believe that to
give freely can scarcely be called a sacrifice, for no money gives so
much pleasure as that freely offered to the Lord’s service; and no
people enjoy property so much as they do who are free and open-
hearted givers. I have not the slightest hesitation, therefore, in
appealing to you for free and generous offerings, for I can say as St.
Paul said (Philip, iv. 17), “I desire fruit that may abound to your
account;” and I am thoroughly persuaded, that no person who is
induced to give freely will ever repent of “a sacrifice acceptable and
well pleasing to God.”
II. We may turn, then, to our second subject, the relationship of
this sacrifice to the great and perfect sacrifice offered once and for
ever on the cross.
One thing is perfectly clear, that these sacrifices are not a
supplement to the one great sacrifice for sin. They are not intended
to supply any deficiency in the great work of our Blessed Lord.
There is no deficiency there; and if there were, nothing that we
could do would supply it. There is no deficiency, for by the “one
offering He hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.” And if
there were deficiency, how could man supply it? Is there not
something dreadful in the thought of a patchwork atonement, partly
by the Son of God and partly by man; partly perfect, and partly
imperfect; partly pure in all the infinite purity of God, and partly
defiled with all the defilements of a fallen and sinful manhood? No!
the propitiation is perfect, unmixed, and undefiled for ever. It is the
sacrifice of the Son of God, and it stands alone for all eternity.
Nor, again, is this sacrifice the means whereby the great sacrifice is
applied to the soul. This is a more common idea than the other, and
one prevailing among many who are thoroughly opposed to Popery.
It is in harmony with human nature to suppose that we must make
our sacrifice in order to gain a share of the blessings of His. Thus
people will sometimes give up, first one thing, and then another,
hoping by these sacrifices to find peace through the blood of
atonement of the Lord Jesus Christ. They have no idea of being
saved through anything but the great sacrifice of the Lord Jesus
Christ; but they consider that they must make their sacrifice in order
to secure the application of his work to themselves. This is the
principle of almost all self-imposed mortifications. People hope
through them to be partakers of reconciliation through the great
atonement. Yet none of these things satisfy the soul. I have myself
known persons who have resolutely made the effort, but utterly
failed. They have become anxious about their soul, and set to work
to reach the cross of Christ by personal self-denial. They have given
up their different pursuits one by one; but at length they have found
that nothing has done them any good. They have been just as far
from the peace of reconciliation as they were the day they began.
None of these sacrifices had helped them in the least. No, and none
could help them. Nothing could help them but a free justification
through faith, and faith alone; and that, thank God! at last they have
found sufficient. And so will every other guilty sinner who throws
himself in utter helplessness, to be freely forgiven, and freely saved,
by the great grace of God in Christ Jesus. Let none suppose, then,
that any sacrifice which we can render can ever make us partakers
of the great salvation once purchased by the one sacrifice of the
Lord Jesus Christ. This salvation is given on altogether different
terms. It is given as a free gift to those who can produce nothing; a
gift bestowed in unfettered mercy on those who can only say, in the
language of the hymn:—
What, then, is the relationship between our sacrifice and His? and
how are they connected? There can be no doubt on this subject if
we turn to the text, where we read, “I beseech you therefore, by the
mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice.” It is,
therefore, the deep sense of unmerited mercy that is to call out the
willing sacrifice from a saved and thankful people. This is just how it
stands in our Communion Service. We first come with the
confession of sin; we then partake of the sacred feast; and seek, by
God’s grace, to realise in living faith the body broken and the blood
shed for our sins; after which, but not before, we “offer and present
to Him ourselves, our souls and our bodies, to be a reasonable, holy,
and lively sacrifice unto Him.” Our sacrifice, therefore, is the result
of our deep sense of unmerited mercy shown in His perfect sacrifice
on the cross. It is a sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving. It is the
willing offering of those who have found mercy, and are most deeply
and humbly thankful for it.
This, then, being the case, we see at once why there is not more
self-sacrifice for God. The reason clearly is, that there is a want of
the deep sense of mercy. The sacrifice of Christ is not sufficiently
realised, and the result is that the self-sacrifice is withheld. I fear
there is a great want of self-sacrifice even among those who hold
the truth. Surely there are many whose religion never costs them
any real personal self-denial. They pass through life easily and
respectably, but refer matters more to their own inclination than to
the call of God. They are more ready to pay others to work than to
work themselves, and are prone to stand aloof from distasteful
service, if, as they say, it does not suit them; or, as they might say,
they do not like it. So, again, but few deny themselves in giving,
and though many are liberal, there are few whose personal comforts
are really diminished by their liberality. Now, why is this? and how is
it that the great salvation has not more power over us? Is it not that
the salvation itself is not enough felt and appreciated? It is true of
us, as it was of the Corinthians, that “we know the grace of our Lord
Jesus Christ, who, though He was rich, yet for our sakes became
poor, that we through His poverty might be rich.” But though we
know it, we do not deeply feel it. It is like paint lying on the surface,
but it is not burnt into us, so as to become part and parcel of
ourselves. Everything may be correct; our doctrine scriptural, and
our principles sound: but neither one nor the other has gone home
to the inmost soul with such power that we have learned to “count
all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus
our Lord.” What is it, then, that we want? What must lie at the root
of all? A more powerful sense of mercy, a deeper conviction of
need, a clearer perception of what Christ has done for us, a more
thorough appreciation of His perfect sacrifice; and when that is
given, we shall be better able to understand the appeal,—“I beseech
you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your
bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your
reasonable service.”
THE MINISTRY OF
RECONCILIATION.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com