Neural recording and stimulation using wireless networks of microimplants(科研通-ablesci.com)
Neural recording and stimulation using wireless networks of microimplants(科研通-ablesci.com)
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-021-00631-8
Multichannel electrophysiological sensors and stimulators—particularly those used to study the nervous system—are usually
based on monolithic microelectrode arrays. However, the architecture of such arrays limits flexibility in electrode placement
and scaling to a large number of nodes, especially across non-contiguous locations. Here we report wirelessly networked and
powered electronic microchips that can autonomously perform neural sensing and electrical microstimulation. The microchips,
which we term neurograins, have an ~1 GHz electromagnetic transcutaneous link to an external telecom hub, providing bidirec-
tional communication and control at the individual device level. To illustrate the potential of the approach, we show that 48 neu-
rograins can be individually addressed on a rat cortical surface and used for the acute recording of neural activity. Theoretical
calculations and experimental measurements show that the link configuration could potentially be scaled to 770 neurograins
using a customized time-division multiple access protocol.
D
etecting and stimulating physiological electrical activity at Furthermore, microdevices that provide electrical recording and
multiple points can provide insights into the operation of microstimulation in small animals have been demonstrated24–26.
targeted biological circuits such as those in the brain cor- A missing element is, however, an ability to network ensembles
tex. Current high-performance brain–machine cortical interfaces of microimplant nodes via a communication scheme that is scalable
are based on micromachined silicon-based ‘beds of needles’ or to large numbers. We recently proposed a wireless power and com-
electrocorticography (ECoG) planar electrode arrays connected munication approach, as well as mixed-signal integrated circuits,
to external active electronics, with tissue contact points number- for neural recording and stimulation, which could be used as build-
ing on the scale of hundreds1–6. Scaling up the number of channels ing blocks in the development of wirelessly networked microchip
to many thousands is expected to provide considerable perfor- ensembles27–30. In this Article, we report the development of a com-
mance benefits. However, achieving this with current technology plete wireless network of microimplants—termed neurograins—
creates challenges in terms of tethering architecture, data transfer and illustrate its capabilities via neural recording and stimulation
and implantability. One approach to scaling is to use the vertical in the rat cortex.
dimension, with multiple multiplexed probe sites microfabricated
along rigid penetrating silicon shanks (for example, the Neuropixels Wireless neurograin system
approach7). Techniques for high-throughput electrode implanta- Figure 1 summarizes the main features of the neurograin sys-
tion along with wireless brain implants are also being explored (for tem, reported here for epicortical ECoG recording use, where
example, the Neuralink approach8), in addition to wireless methods wireless-communication-compatible microcircuits (application-
that entirely eliminate the tethering of monolithic implants to exter- specific integrated circuits (ASICs)) are realized in a 65 nm RF
nal electronics9–16. complementary metal–oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process, each
An alternative approach to fabricate microscale sensor archi- chiplet occupying a total volume of ~0.1 mm3 (Fig. 1b). The electro-
tectures is to use multichannel implant ensembles that consist of magnetic interface for communication and near-field power har-
individual stand-alone microdevices. For example, piezoelectric vesting between an external hub and the ensemble of neurograins is
materials have been integrated into implants for energy harvesting conceptualized in Fig. 1a, which also shows the additional subcuta-
and data transmission using ultrasound as the intermediary modal- neous resonant co-planar relay coil designed to improve the WPT
ity17; the neural signal recording and stimulation capabilities of these efficiency. A block-diagram-level description of the key electronic
devices have also been tested in vivo18,19. Purely electromagnetic functions including the dedicated telemetry blocks is shown in
wireless power transfer (WPT) and communication in the near field Fig. 1c for the recording and stimulating versions of the
(inductive) have also been studied in millimetre-sized devices20–22. neurograin system.
Achieving good electromagnetic coupling is inherently challeng- Standard amplitude-shift keying (ASK), frequency-shift keying,
ing for small-area chip-scale antennas17,23, but radio-frequency load-shift keying or infrared–ultrawideband modulation schemes
(RF) techniques can—if properly optimized—provide an efficient have been used to communicate with microimplants, demonstrated
approach for wireless energy harvesting and telecommunication. so far in limited channel bandwidth systems, typically below 1 Mbps
School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 2Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA. 3Graduate
1
School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. 4Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of
California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. 5Qualcomm Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. 6Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
✉e-mail: [email protected]
a b
Wireless Tx coil RF power/downlink 2 mm
RF link
Uplink
Coaxial
cable
Cortex
Neurograin
Portable
transceiver Relay coil 10 mm
1 mm
c
Tissue (for
example, skin, Power
management Amp
External wireless hub skull, dura)
Chip controller
On-chip coil
Neurograin
recording
Software-defined radio BPSK modulation
Uplink Logic ‘0’ Logic ‘1’
(10 Mbps)
FPGA ADC
Amp
Transceiver
Relay coil
Tx coil
Power
management
Chip controller
On-chip coil
stimulation
Neurograin
Processor
Duplexer
Power/
downlink ASK-PWM demodulation
(1 Mbps) Logic ‘1’ Logic ‘0’
2T T T 2T
To PC
Neurograin
array
Fig. 1 | Wireless neurograin system for distributed autonomous networking. a, Concept of a transcutaneous RF power and data link for a neurograin array.
b, Handful of chiplets (size, 650 μm × 650 μm × 250 μm) present on a United States dime (the inset shows an optional post-process-integrated microwire for
intracortical access, which has been used to demonstrate microstimulation in this paper). c, Block diagram of the overall electronic system, consisting of the
external RF hub, inductive coupling link and key features of the neurograins for recording and stimulation, respectively. FPGA, field-programmable gate array;
Amp, amplifier; PC, personal computer; T, time interval.
(refs. 25,31,32). For large ensembles of spatially distributed implants, a stimulation site operates as a microminiaturized autonomous sensor
more versatile networking protocol with larger data bandwidth is node with its own independent wireless telemetry channel. For com-
needed. Multichannel techniques such as frequency-division mul- parison with the work presented here, Supplementary Table 1 lists
tiple access (FDMA) and code-division multiple access (CDMA) examples of other state-of-the-art microdevices.
are well established in cellular networks33. However, when consid-
ering their adaptation to microimplants, the FDMA approach can System-on-chip microimplant
encounter channel size restrictions as well as challenges with indi- Individual microchips operating as a part of wirelessly networked
vidual band tuning34. CDMA implementation requires fine timing ensembles need to incorporate multiple functions from energy
calibration and has been demonstrated only as a two-channel sys- harvesting to bidirectional data communication as well as neural
tem so far35 (Supplementary Information provides a more detailed recording and/or stimulation. The neurograins shown in Fig. 1
comparison in ‘Comparison of possible TDMA, FDMA and CDMA are submillimetre-sized system-on-chip (SoC) systems designed
approaches for neurograins’). as ASICs, which must be tightly constrained for ultralow-power
In light of these considerations, in our neural implants, we have operation. In this work, we have designed ASICs using the TSMC
opted to implement a specific power-efficient time-division multiple 65 nm mixed-signal/RF low-power CMOS foundry process, with
access (TDMA) network strategy for communication and the active no off-chip components. The photomicrograph shown in Fig. 2a
management of system latency, which provides the necessary scalabil- indicates the overall footprint and main functional circuit areas of a
ity as well as power and size efficiency in our neurograin multi-user neurograin chip specifically fabricated for electrical microstimula-
network. The key accomplishment in this paper is the integration of tion according to the block diagram shown in Fig. 2b. The corre-
ECoG-type neural recording, intracortical stimulation and telecom- sponding block diagram and footprint for a recording neurograin
munication functions on a single submillimetre microchip and the are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.
demonstration of a multinode wireless microsensor system includ- Both recording and stimulating the neurograin chiplets share a
ing the initial application in vivo. In this approach, each recording or common ‘RF interface’ (microcircuits indicated by the blue arrow
–21.8
VDD Comp
ASK- –31.8
Tx tone
Stim BPSK data
PWM Downlink
–41.8
Pad 1 Pad 2
Rectifier
data
–51.8
Vsw
Downlink Mod data Stim –102
d 0 e 0.4 f
Duplexer
0.2
density (dB Hz–1)
–20
Power spectral
Voltage (V)
0
–40
PA
–0.2
–60 SDR
–0.4 To coil
100 101 102 0 1 2 2 cm
Frequency (Hz) Time (ms)
Fig. 2 | Design of neurograin chip and wireless power and data link. a, A photomicrograph of the stimulating neurograin (outer dimensions, 500 μm × 500 μm)
comprising a three-turn microcoil (identical for each neurograin), rectifier, downlink decoder and device ID. A pair of contact electrode pads forming the
physiological interface with tissue is also identified. b, Block diagram of the ASIC circuit. The blue arrow highlights the RF interface (circuits common to the
neurograins of different modalities), and the red arrow points to blocks dedicated to particular physiological interfaces (recording, stimulation, and so on).
Stim, stimulation; VDD, voltage supply; VSW, switching voltage; Osc, oscillator; Clk, clock; Comp, comparator; Addr, address; LFSR, linear-feedback shift register.
c, RF spectrum showing the baseband Tx tone and BPSK-modulated backscattered data lobe of the receiving channel. d, Normalized power spectral density of
a recording neurograin detecting 40 Hz, 2 mV peak-to-peak sinusoids injected into the surrounding saline. e, Biphasic current stimulation voltage waveforms
generated by the stimulating neurograin for three different pulse widths per phase (100, 200 and 400 μs). A 20 kΩ load was used. f, Photograph of the
benchtop external RF telecom hub consisting of a software-defined radio (SDR), a power amplifier (PA) and a duplexer.
in Fig. 2b, while the red arrow indicates the purpose-specific sub- Supplementary Fig. 3a. The network architecture and data rates
circuit for microstimulation in this case). This common RF inter- highlighted herein allow the incorporation of downlink commu-
face includes an efficient power-harvesting circuit feeding off a nication around the Tx tone to complete a real-time bidirectional
three-turn on-chip coil (Fig. 2b) and utilizing a three-stage, low communication loop, as described in the next section. For neural
turn-on, deep n-well n-type metal–oxide–semiconductor transistor stimulation applications, we choose a 1 Mbps downlink rate, suf-
rectifier circuit with a low transistor threshold36. Up to 48.5% recti- ficient to include a range of command signals for commonly used
fication efficiency at −10 dBm input is achieved—a critical feature electrical microstimulation protocols for the mammalian brain.
for the feasibility of neurograin microimplants—through the avoid- A particular challenge for designing a communication proto-
ance of body effects in the n-type metal–oxide–semiconductor col for ensembles of neurograins is the inherent variance in the
transistors in this design37. An RF backscattering data uplink chan- on-chip-generated clock frequency and phase, which arises from the
nel operates at a rate of 10 Mbps near the ~1 GHz baseband wireless finite variation in the power harvested by each chip. This variation
powering link and is enabled through a modulator (‘Mod’ in Fig. 2b). makes synchronization difficult to achieve under usual protocols.
The specific choice of wireless frequency near 1 GHz, based on We tackled this challenge by using a custom ASK and pulse width
electromagnetic simulations, represents our compromise between modulation (ASK-PWM) scheme to implement the 1 Mbps down-
trade-offs to achieve an acceptable cross-section of the near-field link, as demonstrated by the circuit shown in Fig. 2b. This modula-
microantenna while minimizing the penalty by absorptive losses tion approach provides network synchronicity and is robust across
due to body tissue (‘The rationale for the 1 GHz range frequency the measured range of chip clock rates. The ASK-PWM approach,
selection’ in Supplementary Information). which is compatible with our proposed networking architecture
We use binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) modulation for uplink (outlined in the next section), encodes each bit as a combination
communications. The modulator operates by toggling a tuning of high- and low-power (amplitude) pulses of variable duration.
capacitor to enable RF backscattering. While ensuring that the mag- The received data on individual neurograins may thus be decoded
nitude of its input impedance is maintained at a constant value, the using only the relative durations between the high and low states,
phase modulation is maximized by selecting the value of the tog- independent of the internal clock frequency. Supplementary Fig. 2
gling capacitor to maintain a stable power supply to the chip37. Data illustrates the principle of the ASK-PWM scheme and the decoding
are upconverted before backscatter using an on-chip, free-running circuit implemented in this work.
relaxation oscillator with an operational frequency near 30 MHz; A unique device identifier (ID) is imperative for the functional
the latter enables spectral isolation of the BPSK-modulated signal implementation of an addressable wireless network. For the neu-
from the transmitted RF powering (Tx) tone, as shown in Fig. 2c. rograin microimplants, we have successfully tested two different
High-fidelity isolation of the backscattered data facilitates their ID approaches: (1) a physical digital address, engraved on-chip by
low-noise demodulation and recovery at the external hub (Fig. 2f) laser ablation38, and (2) an addressing scheme based on physically
for online or offline analysis (Methods). An example of the demod- unclonable functions (PUF)39,40; the latter approach is discussed
ulation of the BPSK-modulated backscattered signal is shown in below in a neural recording example. In the case of the laser ablation
approach (an example is demonstrated below for microstimulation and transmitted over 82 µs (10 Mbps rate) in a pseudo-randomly
(‘device ID’ in Fig. 2a)), a user-selectable 10-bit address is physi- determined time slot. This hardware-efficient approach, however,
cally imprinted onto an array of ten metal interconnect traces on the has a network capacity for ~100 nodes, beyond which the possibility
top aluminium metal layer of the chip by selectively ablating a spe- of packet collisions (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4a) increases
cific number of traces with a 532 nm pulsed laser. By contrast, the for an ensemble of free-floating microimplants due to unscheduled
address circuits using the PUF approach take advantage of intrin- backscattering and chip-clock frequency variations.
sic 65 nm CMOS fabrication process variations to generate unique, In principle, an externally commanded, programmable, synchro-
randomized bit patterns. The number of bits in a PUF address has to nized ‘call-and-respond’ network offers a considerable enhance-
be carefully considered to minimize the chance for address overlap ment in both network efficiency and adaptive channel selectivity
for a given population of networked nodes. In our case, we have compared with ‘autonomous’ operation, but at the cost of integrat-
implemented 16–20-bit PUFs, anticipating an insignificant address ing downlink communication circuits on the microdevices. In an
collision rate for ensembles of up to 1,000 nodes. In general, the exploratory investigation of this architecture, integrated onto the
PUF approach offers distinct advantages in scalability due to the neurograin SoCs, we have found a capability to bidirectionally com-
compact footprint and absence of labour-intensive post-processing; municate with 425 microdevices within a 100 ms period, theoreti-
however, the unique address needs to be ‘discovered’ for every neu- cally extendable up to 770 microdevices through the integration of
rograin. For the discovery of the PUF address, each neurograin has a shorter ‘call’ downlink (ongoing research), which would be the
to be individually tested before the experiments as they transmit likely eventual choice for truly large-scale multinode communica-
their PUF address through the uplink. tion for distributed microsensor networks. A detailed discussion
The front end of a neurograin SoC integrates high-fidelity physi- for TDMA scalability is provided in Supplementary Information
ological sensing (recording) and actuating (stimulation) circuits with (‘Scalability of the neurograin TDMA network’). To validate and
a special focus on ultraminiaturization and extremely low power compare the two communication protocols, benchtop experiments
operation. To this end, we have designed an analogue front end (AFE) were performed in air using a three-coil wireless system with 8 mm
for recording, a version of which is shown here for the acquisition separation between the Tx and relay coil.
of ECoG signals using a d.c.-coupled voltage-to-current converter The ‘autonomous’ TDMA protocol relies on the chip’s unique
merged with an analogue-to-digital converter via an area-efficient device ID, and as the chip only uses the uplink in its transmitting
capacitor-less approach41. The AFE directly senses neural poten- path, this built-in prefabricated PUF ID probabilistically determines
tials (without the need for bulky a.c.-coupling capacitors) with the device’s initial communication time slot in the network queue.
input-referred noise of 2.2 µV and 500 Hz bandwidth, and it occupies Data are periodically backscattered at the predesigned network
an overall footprint of 100 μm × 100 μm while recording at a 1 kHz latency (nominally, 100 ms). The on-chip clocks are designed to be
sampling rate and 8-bit resolution. Benchtop characterization mea- free running at 30 MHz with a variation of ±12.3%; this variation is
surements are summarized in Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 3b. due to the spatial dependence of the magnetic coupling strength and
Electrical microstimulation, on the other hand, is facilitated the resulting variation in the received RF power. Figure 3b shows the
through circuits designed to deliver biphasic current pulses with measured transient data received at the external hub from a network
programmable pulse widths (here 100, 200 and 400 μs) as com- of 64 chips. The ‘pulses’ indicate periodic data packets sent by the
manded by the external wireless hub through the downlink (Fig. nodes. For each data packet, the decoded bits are compared with the
2e,f). At present, the maximum level of current stimulation depends predefined sequence to determine the bit error rate (BER). Due to
on the chip power level and can range up to 25 μA, as shown in the randomized time slots, among the 1,160 data packets detected,
Supplementary Fig. 3c; future work will incorporate stimulation 128 packets showed effects by packet collisions, that is, the simulta-
amplitude regulation across the network. We implemented pro- neous transmission of data, which checks with the simulation of the
grammable stimulation control to include both single-shot and packet success rate (no collisions) shown in Supplementary Fig. 5b.
100 Hz pulse train paradigms, the latter mitigating the data bur- Since a collision only affects portions of a given packet, demodula-
den on the downlink. The single-shot mode is capable of trigger- tion of the remainder of the data within the collided packets was
ing burst stimulation at rates faster than 500 Hz using the recursive still possible, where data was recovered with an average BER of
downlink, which is above the frequency commonly used for electri- 1.82%. When entirely excluding the collided packets, the average
cal microstimulation in the cortex. BER was 0.007%, showing that packet collision was the dominant
factor for bit errors in autonomous TDMA. The signal-to-noise
Networking of neurograin ensembles ratio (SNR) and BER for 1,160 packets are shown in Supplementary
We employed a TDMA-based networking architecture using a sin- Fig. 4b. An example of the characterization of the long-term stabil-
gle carrier frequency to enable periodic, scheduled communication ity of WPT and data telemetry scheme is shown in Fig. 3c. When
to and from the ensembles of implanted devices. The efficient use 1,800 data packets are subsampled from 64 neurograins over 30 min,
of finite channel bandwidth while maximizing the networked node the spread of their relative pulse powers mapped the harvested vari-
count is of utmost importance in a neural prosthesis application, able energy as a function of the chip’s spatial location. Packet RF
which also demands low-latency data-streaming capabilities. In this power and recovered chip clock frequency are plotted in Fig. 3c,
paper, we compare two different TDMA-based schemes: ‘autono- with each colour representing an individual neurograin, while the
mous’ and ‘call-and-respond’ approach. k-mean clustering into 64 groups shows a well-isolated, stable clock
The key trade-off in large-scale network design is the balance frequency over time.
between hardware complexity and networking efficiency: the former As noted, to avoid packet collision inherent in the autonomous
defines stringent power and area constraints for the microdevices, TDMA mode, we also explored a ‘call-and-respond’ TDMA net-
while the latter is critical for scalability. In recognition of these con- work, where the ASK-PWM protocol for downlink communication
siderations, the neurograin SoC network was initially realized using is integrated in the microdevices. The unique device IDs (16-bit PUF
unidirectional ‘autonomous’ TDMA since this is a simple, compact address), implemented on-chip, are recovered from the ensemble
and low-power approach for early ensemble testing at the benchtop through an automatic start-up communication. The IDs are subse-
and in rodents where channel counts are limited by the anatomy. quently used to externally command individual devices through the
In the autonomous mode, there is no synchronization between the ASK-PWM link. Each downlink command is received and down-
nodes. Each microdevice needs to buffer and store up to 100 ms of link codes are deciphered across the ensemble in a synchronized
data (820 bits, PUF address and recording); these data are packetized manner. If the received downlink code matches a given device’s
0.8
Amplitude (a.u.)
0.6
28
0.4
26
0.2
0 24
0 20 40 60 80 100 1.0 1.5 2.0
Time (ms) Backscattering amplitude (a.u.)
d e f
DL UL DL UL DL UL 12
BER
1.0 10–1 SNR 11
10
0.8
SNR (dB)
9
0.6
8
0.4 –2
10 7
0.2 6
0 5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 10 20 30
Time (ms) Number of chips
Fig. 3 | Data communication demonstration on the benchtop with 8 mm separation between the Tx and relay coil in air. a, Sixty-four autonomous TDMA
chips, with placement within a relay coil having an area of 20.4 mm × 20.4 mm. b, A transient recording on the uplink data packets from multiple chips
under ‘autonomous’ TDMA. c, Recovered clock frequencies and backscattering amplitudes of 1,800 data packets sampled for over 30 min from 64 chips.
d, A 32-node call-and-respond network within a relay coil. e, A transient recording on the downlink (DL) and uplink (UL) under ‘call-and-respond’ TDMA.
f, Average BER from 1,000 uplinked bits versus data packet SNR of 947 data packets from 32 chips individually identified by PUF addresses.
address, it transmits a data packet (‘respond’). Figure 3e shows a This approach is not only able to achieve electrode impedances suit-
snapshot of the transient received signal at the external hub with a able for epicortical ECoG recording (Fig. 4b, left) but also suitable
strong downlink call of 40 μs and weak, uplink backscattered data for the attachment of microwires (a 50-μm-diameter tungsten wire
of 100 μs for a network of 32 neurograins. Successful communica- (Fig. 4b, right)) for use as intracortical electrodes such as that in
tions, measured by the response rate to the downlink, occur with an the microstimulation experiments below. For long-term chronic
average efficacy of 94.7% across this network, and we were also able device implantation (not the goal of this paper), we have reported
to identify three other devices with <90% efficacy (Supplementary elsewhere the development of ultrathin dielectric coatings, applied
Fig. 7a). This can be possibly due to CMOS fabrication and dic- by atomic vapour deposition, to obtain biocompatible, hermetically
ing process variations since all the available chips were tested and sealed neurograins42.
no prior screening was done. The uplinked 967 data packets from While each modality (recording and stimulation) is anticipated
these chips, comprising 1,000-bit predefined sequences, yielded an to ultimately integrate into a single, bidirectional TDMA link, we are
average BER of 0.004%, as shown in Fig. 3f (Supplementary Fig. 7c currently able to leverage this protocol to fulfil the specific needs of
for each packet), validating the ability of the downlink/uplink and each separate function across neurograin ensembles. The recording
the network to withstand variations in SNR and on-chip power. chip reported here generates the uplink under autonomous TDMA
Further work on the ‘call-and-respond’ approach is subject to ongo- (see the previous section). Since the head/skull size of a rat and the
ing research. associated craniotomy limits the number of practically implantable
neurograins (here N = 48), the probability of data packet collision is
Wireless recording and microstimulation by neurograins low. As examples of recordings in saline (Supplementary Fig. 8a),
We have built and assessed a fully functional system (as shown in various current waveforms were injected from a nearby microwire
Fig. 1), both on a benchtop (saline solution) and in an in vivo rat either as proxy neural signals (Fig. 4c) or sinusoids at 200 and 40 Hz
model for neural recording as well as electrical microstimulation, (Supplementary Fig. 8b,c), and the recordings by the neurograins
focusing on the ‘autonomous’ TDMA network implementation. For are qualitatively compared with those acquired by a commercial
multichannel, ensemble neural recording, the external wireless hub wired neural recording system (using the multichannel neural
receives neural data as TDMA digital streams. In the stimulation signal processor ‘Nomad’ by Ripple Neuro). A quantitative com-
mode, the hub coordinates the ASK-PWM downlink for space– parison is difficult with a large rack-mounted commercial system,
time-specific microstimulation. but the results show how further improvement is needed for neu-
Converting fabricated microchips into functional microsensors/ rograins (recorded signal quality) even if they capture the low- and
stimulators requires further post-processing after their dicing from high-frequency feature of local field potentials quite well.
the wafer. For a fast turnaround, we have developed a polymer-based In the initial in vivo assessment, we were able to deploy neu-
microfabrication technique38 to deposit planar gold microelectrodes rograin ensembles while identifying 48 unique PUF addresses
(60 μm pad size) atop the aluminium input contact pads of the chip. (‘In vivo data analysis: role of the PUF address’ in Supplementary
a b
Neurograin
array
Tx coil
100 µm 1 mm
c d e 400
Neurograin 1
Voltage (µV)
1.0 Neurograins 125
200
0 0
0.5
Voltage (mV)
Neurograin 1
–200 Ketamine
–100
0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000
75 Neurograin 2
Time (ms)
Voltage (µV)
–0.5 0
200
–1.0 –75 0
–200 Isoflurane
Voltage (µV)
1 2 3 4 5 6 Neurograin 3
100
Time (s) 0 200 400 600 800 1,000
0 Time (ms)
Voltage (µV)
Reference –100 400
200
Neurograin 4 0
Voltage (mV)
2 100
Neurograin 2
–200
–400 Ketamine
0
0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000
–100 Time (ms)
Neurograin 5
Voltage (µV)
125
–2 200
0 0
–200 Isoflurane
1 2 3 4 5 6 –175
Time (s) 1s 0 200 400 600 800 1,000
Time (ms)
f g h Chip a
Downlink 180 180 Stim
Time (ms) Chip b
0.5
Firing rate (spikes per second)
Ch 1
–0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 140 140 80
Voltage (mV)
0.5
Ch 16
0 120 120 60
–0.5
100 100 40
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
0.5 80 80
Ch 44
0 20
–0.5 60 60 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 200 400 200 400 200 400 600
Time (s)
Pulse width (µs) Pulse width (µs) Time (ms)
Fig. 4 | Neurograin recording and stimulation in saline and in vivo acute rat model. a, Photographs of the in vivo implant and head-mounted components
(left) and an array of recording neurograin encapsulated by polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) along with the relay coil on a polyimide board (right). b,
Photomicrographs of gold electrodes fabricated on a chip (left) and microstimulator with intracortical tungsten electrodes (right). c, Injected ECoG signal
recordings from neurograins (top) and a commercial device (Ripple Neuro ‘Nomad’) (bottom) in saline. Distance difference between the signal source and
the recording site resulted in a difference in the signal amplitude. The Nomad system used a distal ground electrode, whereas neurograins measured the
differential between the two on-chip gold electrodes. d, Multichannel neurograin recordings on a spontaneous low-frequency oscillatory wave from the
anaesthetized rat. e, Recorded raw signals on 5 Hz electrical stimulation (blue dots) and the evoked neural response under ketamine and 3% isoflurane
using a recording neurograin array. Stimulation was intracortically delivered while the ECoG recording was performed in the epicortical region. f, Electrical
stimulation trains at 100 Hz from the stimulated neurograin array in saline with downlink artefacts indicated by blue arrows. g, Amplitudes of post-stimulus
LFP response depending on the stimulation pulse width (per phase) from two chips (left and right). Up to 25 μA current was delivered to the tissue from
each device. Error bars are presented as mean values ± s.d. (each consisting of 40 trials). h, Sum of the firing rate from three recording channels before and
after 400 Hz burst stimulation from a neurograin, showing increased post-stimulus firing rates (averaged over five trials with a bin size of 10 ms).
Information and results shown in Supplementary Fig. 9). The skin thickness of a rat (a maximum of 2.5 mm for each tissue layer),
unique address on each chip ensures continuously identifiable the associated RF attenuation is of the order of 2.5 dB, a minor effect
neural data flow from each recording neurograin, showing that on total losses (Supplementary Fig. 15d).
communication with 48 channels was established. For the in vivo The geometry for testing the neurograin system in the in vivo
experiments, the skull was not replaced, in part because of the large rat model (acute) involved a six-channel commercial intracortical
craniotomy required to accommodate at least 48 neurograins made stimulation device using tungsten microwire electrodes, while the
this impractical in acute experiments. However, given the skull and epicortical neurograins recorded the evoked neural activity (‘In vivo
a b
Tx coil Tx coil
Cross-section Cross-section
Skin
8 mm Skin
5 mm
Skull Skull
Relay Relay
coil Grey matter coil Grey matter
5 mm 5 mm
B (a.u.) B (a.u.)
1 1
10 mm
–1 –1
e f
Efficiency (dB)
–14
(0.8 mm unit)
Simulation Measurement 1
Simulation
–31
Y grid
8 –22 8 –16
2
–18
Y grid (1.0 mm unit)
–32 3
–24
Efficiency (dB)
6 6 Efficiency (dB)
–33 2 4 6 8 10
–26 –34 X grid (1.0 mm unit)
4 4
Efficiency (dB)
Measurement –25
(0.8 mm unit)
–35 1
–28 Y grid –26
2 2 2 –27
–36
–30 3 –28
2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 10
X grid (1.0 mm unit) X grid (1.0 mm unit) X grid (1.0 mm unit)
Amplitude (a.u.)
26
BER (%)
0.6 0.6
0
10 24
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2 22
0 0 10–1 20
0 200 0 200 In Out of In Out of
Time (µs) Time (µs) phase phase phase phase
Fig. 5 | Wireless efficiency characterization. a, WPT system proposed for a primate model consists of the transmitting (Tx) coil, relay coil and receiver
(Rx) microcoils targeting 8 mm separation (4 mm skin and 4 mm skull). b, Coils for the rodent model targeting 5 mm separation (2.5 mm skin and 2.5 mm
skull). c, Photographs of the packaged Tx and relay coil for the primate and rodent model with an embedded chip array. d, Magnetic flux (B) generated
by the relay coil design that shows alternating fluxes of subunit coils (the direction of flux is shown as red or blue). e,f, Maps of simulated (left, top) and
measured (right, bottom) wireless transfer efficiency with regard to the spatial location inside one of the subunit relay coil for the primate and rodent
model, respectively. The X grid size is 1.0 mm for both cases and the Y grid size is 1.0 mm for the primate model coil and 0.8 mm for the rodent model coil.
The magnetic field distribution of one subcoil is shown for the symmetrical structure. g, Parallel-relay scheme with 69 chips activated through two adjacent
relay coils with 8 mm separation. In the current coil design, multiple relay coils placed in proximity to each other do not destructively interfere, allowing
scalability of the wireless power and data communication area. h, Received RF data packet shapes using shared RF carrier sources in phase (left) or
two separate RF carrier sources out of phase (right). The out-of-phase condition simulates the interference of two regular coils under non-ideal phase
shifting. i, BER (left) and clock frequency (right) of n = 865 and n = 733 data packets (in phase and out of phase, respectively). Bar charts show the average
values and the error bars are presented as mean values ± s.e.m.
of the neurograin system, we used the strength of the backscat- ple of such scalability, Fig. 5g demonstrates a dual Tx and dual Rx
tered RF signal as the guide to optimally align the Tx coil with channel, 69-node system using autonomous TDMA chips. When
submillimetre accuracy. the dual Tx coils are in phase, implemented simply through sharing
This wireless powering and data transmission scheme is intrinsi- the RF source in our WPT design, each subunit coil drives the cur-
cally designed to be parallel-extendable to cover multiple cortical rent in a direction opposite to that of the adjacent coils. Therefore,
areas and increase the channel capacity in the future. As an exam- their respective magnetic fluxes do not destructively co-interfere,
Reporting Summary
Nature Research wishes to improve the reproducibility of the work that we publish. This form provides structure for consistency and transparency
in reporting. For further information on Nature Research policies, see our Editorial Policies and the Editorial Policy Checklist.
Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement
A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly
The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one- or two-sided
Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted
Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.
For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes
Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated
Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.
Data analysis Data analysis and plotting was executed with MATLAB (version R2019b).
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors and
reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.
Data
Policy information about availability of data
All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable:
- Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets
- A list of figures that have associated raw data
April 2020
Codes and the dataset that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available in the supplementary file and from the corresponding
author upon reasonable request.
1
nature research | reporting summary
Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.
Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf
Replication All experiments has been performed in tissue-proxy (saline) condition or the animal independently and replication of system interface was
successful. Also, multiple data points have been collected in the case of biology studies.
Randomization This study focuses on the hardware system validation and no randomization study was needed.
Blinding This study focuses on the hardware system validation and no binding study was needed.
Ethics oversight All research protocols were approved and monitored by the Brown University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.
April 2020