lead_compensation_MCS1
lead_compensation_MCS1
1. Delay time, td
2. Rise time, tr
3. Peak time, tp
4. Maximum (percent) overshoot, Mp
5. Settling time, ts: the final value (2% or 5%).
Example 1: Obtain the transfer function of the motor.
Example 2:
6) Integral controllers: =
7) Proportional-plus-integral controllers: = Kp
8) Proportional-plus-derivative controllers : = K p + Kd S
9) Proportional-plus-integral-plus-derivative controllers: = Kp
The performance specification for a system are usually based on a desired damping
ratio , undamped natural frequency n , and steady state errors ess. The root locus
diagrams for the system may show that the desired performance cannot be achieved by
adjustment of gain alone. The control engineer must then attempt to reshape the root
locus by introducing dynamic compensator to meet the desired performance
specifications.
Remember that the addition of integral control adds a pole at the origin, thus making the
system less stable. Fig. 1 shows examples of root loci illustrating the effects of the
addition of a pole to a single-pole system and the addition of two poles to a single-pole
system
Adding only zero often problematic because such controller amplifies the high-
frequency noise and more stable.
There are many ways to realize lead compensators and lag compensators, such as
electronic networks using operational amplifiers, electrical RC networks, and mechanical
spring-dashpot systems. Fig.3 shows an electronic circuit using operational amplifiers and
the transfer function for this circuit are:
GC =
Where : , , then
It is a lag network if or